Slashdot Mirror


Lithuania Calls On EU To Stop Adjusting Clocks For Daylight Savings (theguardian.com)

AmiMoJo shares a report from The Guardian: Lithuania has said that it would push the European Union to abolish its law on daylight saving time, claiming that most people find it annoying to have to adjust their clocks twice a year. An opinion poll published this year showed that 79% of people in the nation of 2.8 million were against the annual ritual of adjusting clocks forward by one hour in the spring and then back an hour in the autumn. Proponents of daylight saving time, adopted at the beginning of the 20th century, say the longer evening daylight hours in the summer help save energy and bolster productivity. The European Commission said it was "currently examining the summertime question based on all available evidence."

170 comments

  1. Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by crow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Daylight Saving Time is a great idea. Ditching it in the winter is the problem. Just keep it year round and eliminate the stupid changing.

    1. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      OR we could have everyone keep time on their phones and have the phones automatically change the time by a few seconds every day!

      This is probably my greatest idea ever.

    2. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      Daylight Saving Time is a great idea. Ditching it in the winter is the problem. Just keep it year round and eliminate the stupid changing.

      Why do you think it matters if we call a certain time of day "8 A.M." or "9 A.M."?

      I mean, I'm all for not changing times, and I don't really care what arbitrary point you set to be your "noon", but I can't see that it makes any difference. It's not like your body cares about how we define what hour it is.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason to shift local noon that far away from solar noon.

    4. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you work until 5pm, and it gets dark at 5:10pm, you've swepnt all your daylight inside. If it gets dark at 6:10pm, at least you have a bit of daylight.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local noon should be close to solar noon, which is when the sun is highest in the sky. There's no reason to skew the time zones two hours or more, in some cases.

    6. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, what you're saying is that your employer doesn't realize that "4PM with daylight savings time" and "5PM with daylight savings time" are the exact same time?

      I don't think "because people are complete and utter morons" is a good reason to keep doing DST.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    7. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm very concerned about the environment. Gaining an extra hour of daylight during the rest of year will heat the Earth up even more. I'd prefer we do away with daylight saving time altogether. Let's not add to global warming even more. We should reject making daylight saving time a year round thing.

    8. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      That should have been "4PM without DST", of course.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    9. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, so the old "it doesn't matter if the official time moves around, everyone will just have different office hours during daylight savings time, all move in unison (as companies have to work together) change signs/automated messages/websites and have Google recrawl the web" answer that ignores that the way we coordinate changes like that is... by having customary start/end times for businesses and shifting the clocks until we like where we end up.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    10. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      disruptions to human circadian rhythm mean it increases the risk of death

    11. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      by having customary start/end times for businesses and shifting the clocks until we like where we end up.

      You realize that the whole point of this article is that tons of people don't like where we end up with shifting clocks and DST, right?

      Somehow, astoundingly, the world doesn't end in places that don't have DST.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    12. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, once again, the jobless autists with no concept of social skills are talking about how everyone should just adjust their clock based on sunrise and sunset times instead of rolling with something that works perfectly fine

    13. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by mretondo · · Score: 1

      Ditto!

    14. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by mretondo · · Score: 1

      Yeah why do I want it to be dark by 8:00pm instead of 9:00 in the summer.

    15. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wat?

    16. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      I don't like shifting the clocks. I'm responding (in a hypersarcastic tone) to your dumb idea that 5pm DST = 4pm non-DST is relevant, when I'm talking about people working until 5, and the sun going down at 5:15, as though people will all univerally adjust their hours to make sense.

      By all means, let's choose one time that works. I don't see why we wouldn't. But it has to take into account that most people will work 9-5, whenever we decide that the clocks should read 9-5. So it fucking matters.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    17. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm of the opposite opinion. Keep standard time year round. Leave the meridian at noon. Otherwise AM and PM have no meaning.

    18. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      move to the western edge of your TZ.

    19. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      79% of europeans don't like adjusting their clocks twice a year. That's not the same as 79% of europeans want to stay on standard time year round. The article doesn't say if people prefer DST year round or Standard Time year round.

    20. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... Autistics who don't go outside... like the entire populations of Saskatchewan, Arizona, Hawaii, Guam, and Peurto Rico, as well as most of South America, Africa, and Asia (including Russia).

      Frankly, the outdoorsman in me is why I much prefer using Standard Time year round. If it wasn't an absolute mess, I'd rather go back to solar clocks. It's healthier to set ones schedule based on the sun. But commerce is difficult if every city and suburb has their own official time, so timezones are a sensible compromise.

    21. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      Daylight Saving Time is a great idea. Ditching it in the winter is the problem. Just keep it year round and eliminate the stupid changing.

      Why do you think it matters if we call a certain time of day "8 A.M." or "9 A.M."?

      I mean, I'm all for not changing times, and I don't really care what arbitrary point you set to be your "noon", but I can't see that it makes any difference. It's not like your body cares about how we define what hour it is.

      People used to think like you. Then trains came along. Then more trains. Then came the eventual collisions, deaths, and other big bummers. Collisions were stopped by more accurately syncing up times across ever wider areas. Unfathomable numbers of people's lives were saved.

      With more and more accurate and more closely synced clocks in the world, there many other cascading benefits. Like some dude named Albert thought up some pretty weird shit on the now safe trains. Super duper uber accurate clocks also gave us some snazzy things like the internets and GPS navigation.

      If we wanna just go all postmodernist and be like, "what is time, reeeeally...?" then you overdosed on glaucoma medication. Being punctilious* with regards to time is a very important thing. Making it a free-for-all with regards to time in the EU is the exact opposite of progress. Our modern society relies on it. Making things more predictable by removing biannual, unnecessary edge cases can only help us in the long term.

      *punctilious sounds like a way to describe oral sex with punctuation. Learning this word recently has made my life glorious.

    22. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by fox171171 · · Score: 0

      Daylight Saving Time is a great idea. Ditching it in the winter is the problem. Just keep it year round and eliminate the stupid changing.

      This. "Spring Forward", then leave it there. No further changes. (Except for the occasional leap seconds.)

    23. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That's fine except for the more northern areas... where the sun already stays out later in the summer anyways. Keeping it year 'round would mean that the sun wouldn't even rise until after 9am in the winter in the areas that are further north.

      And of course, places as far north as Alaska wouldn't even need the sun to be out an extra hour in the summer anyways.

      I'd rather it be standard time year 'round, personally, but I'd settle for splitting the difference.

    24. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I am the opposite, ditch daylight saving time and stay on standard year round. If we were on daylight saving time right now, sunrise would be at 9:50 am here.

    25. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Or, we could just fall back and leave it there. In terms of our body clocks, it's not going to be any difference, and it would still achieve the desired ends of DST not costing any more lives every spring and autumn.

      Further north, the days are already plenty long enough in the summer without pushing sunset even an hour later than it already is, and in the winter, if the clocks were still pushed ahead, the sun wouldn't even be up in these places until after 9am. Sure, the extra hour of daylight in the winter evenings would be a nice to have, there is a rather large problem that arises with taking that hour from the morning:

      I realize that a lot of people drive their kids to school these days anyways, but there's still a heckuva lot that walk in the morning, and it's ultimately safer for them to do so when the sun is out than when it is still dark.

      What we *COULD* do is have everyone south of about 45 degrees on DST year 'round, and everyone north of it on standard time year 'round. That way everybody could be happy, right?

    26. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Imrik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about we get rid of the notion that people work 9-5 while we're at it. This would help reduce congestion on the roads and make it more likely that people will be able to take care of errands before or after work instead of having to use their lunch break.

    27. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Imrik · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between caring what a particular time is called and caring that everyone agrees on what time it is. As long as there's no confusion, it doesn't matter if the sun is at its peak at 12 or 6.

    28. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by crow · · Score: 0

      Obviously our world is full of clocks that can't handle that now, but it did occur to me that it would be cool to just say something like, Sunset is always at 8:00pm in the center of the timezone. Clocks shift at 3am to make that work for the next day. Sure, that means sunrise at 1:30pm in the winter, but at least we can still enjoy our evenings. Who cares if it's dark out when we're at work?

      Maybe in a few decades, all our clocks will use NTP, and something like this could really be done (though I don't see people going for it).

    29. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local noon should be close to solar noon, which is when the sun is highest in the sky. There's no reason to skew the time zones two hours or more, in some cases.

      Except the social and commercial ones that are the cause of/reason for the irregularities from nice straight, 15 degree of longitude wide, time zones, we have today.

    30. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

      OR we could have everyone keep time on their phones and have the phones automatically change the time by a few seconds every day!

      This is probably my greatest idea ever.

      Please don't tell us any of your other ideas.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    31. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I've noticed that switching to GMT from BST (summer time) in the UK has a great effect on my body clock. In winter I can get up at 6am, in summer I seriously struggle to get up before 7am

    32. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Makes sense to me, it's not really convenient to switch forth and back all the time.

      But I will still get up at 05:00 in the morning to avoid traffic congestion when getting to work.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    33. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you work until 5pm, and it gets dark at 5:10pm, you've swepnt all your daylight inside.

      With DST the solution is to shift your work day one hour earlier.

      Without DST the solution is to shift your work day one hour earlier.

      DST achieves nothing useful whatsoever.

    34. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      If you don't like setting your clocks you could just buy clocks that operate on a LW radio clock. Oh look the German government operates one that covers most of Europe, and in the NW corner the British government operates one too. The only clock I need to change is my watch which invariably needs correcting a bit anyway and my oven clock because nobody does an oven with a radio clock dam it. I carefully chose my microwave to not have a clock. Well OK it does have a clock but if you don't set it then it does not display the time.

      The other thing to do is stop running on brain dead OS's that run the hardware clock on the computer in local time; here's looking at you Microsoft.

    35. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same time zone is used from Spain to poland. That's way more difference than 1 hour DST. I'd say UTC everywhere.

    36. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the feeling that if we get rid of it, it will only be in favor of people working more hours a day?

    37. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by markdavis · · Score: 2

      >"Daylight Saving Time is a great idea. Ditching it in the winter is the problem. Just keep it year round and eliminate the stupid changing."

      +1000

      This. It should just never stop being summer time. Problem solved.

    38. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR we could have everyone keep time on their phones and have the phones automatically change the time by a few seconds every day!

      This is probably my greatest idea ever.

      I suggested it last time DST was under discussion on Slashdot.

      It is not even close to being my greatest idea ever.

    39. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      79% of Lithuanians. That's an irrelevant percentage of Europeans

    40. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Kjella · · Score: 1

      How about we get rid of the notion that people work 9-5 while we're at it. This would help reduce congestion on the roads and make it more likely that people will be able to take care of errands before or after work instead of having to use their lunch break.

      It's easy to say when you write code and it doesn't really matter if it happens at 3PM or 3AM. But stores have opening hours, public transport runs on a schedule, nurses work shifts, in all sorts of production facilities you need a whole staff to run the machinery. Or they're done just in time, like when a bakery makes fresh bread or you order a pizza. Some types of work are inherently done in teams or done better by teams or you need to talk to a particular person to make progress. The idea that work in general could ever become random hours the employees choose to put in is simply not realistic. Those who can be flexible and don't have bosses that are asshats usually let you come in early or work late to compensate.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    41. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local noon should be close to solar noon

      Why? What is the goal here?

      First we don't want to change the clock, because we know that a steady sleep schedule is important for health reasons.
      We have also seen that changing the clock causes more accidents.
      Now this doesn't necessarily mean that the clock must be fixed, but we should probably avoid changes that are larger than a few minutes.

      But then what? Why would you want to local noon to be close to the solar one?
      Wouldn't it be nice to make sure that we get sunlight during one of the commuting periods?
      Perhaps we should center solar noon at the latter one to give people sunlight at the end of their working day and beginning of their spare time?
      This is shown to lead to people investing more of their spare time for physical activities which gives us a healthier population.

    42. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      OR we could have everyone keep time on their phones and have the phones automatically change the time by a few seconds every day!

      This is probably my greatest idea ever.

      Please don't tell us any of your other ideas.

      Hey - he's got a great newsletter. And T-Shirts!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    43. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that your employer doesn't realize that "4PM with daylight savings time" and "5PM with daylight savings time" are the exact same time?

      I don't think "because people are complete and utter morons" is a good reason to keep doing DST.

      Perhaps you are an apartment dweller who never sees the outside except during waiting for a bus or train. But there are a lot of us who have not only our jobs, but outside work to do as well. And those extra hours of daylight during the summer are a godsend.

      Where I'm at, it is getting daylight at 4 AM in the summer. Pretty much hard to take advantage of that unless we shift it a little. Work is 8-5, so if I can have that extra daylight at a useful time, its all good. I'd take a 2 hour shift, but that's pushing what the people who don't have any need for DST will accept.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    44. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think it matters if we call a certain time of day "8 A.M." or "9 A.M."?

      Try telling your boss that you are on time when what he calls 9am, you call 8am, and let us know how that pans out for you.

    45. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by djinn6 · · Score: 2

      But stores have opening hours, public transport runs on a schedule, nurses work shifts, in all sorts of production facilities you need a whole staff to run the machinery. Or they're done just in time, like when a bakery makes fresh bread or you order a pizza.

      Literally none of those operate on a 9-5 schedule! My local bakery opens from 8 AM to 8 PM. The light rail runs from 5 AM to 1 AM the next day. The hospital opens 24/7 so it literally doesn't matter when their shifts change.

      Yes, the whole staff need to get there at the same time, but it really doesn't matter whether other businesses operate with the exact same schedule. In fact, most don't!

    46. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, we could just fall back and leave it there. In terms of our body clocks, it's not going to be any difference, and it would still achieve the desired ends of DST not costing any more lives every spring and autumn.

      We could, except the argument always seems to settle around "but DST gives more evening daylight in Summer!". I don't think I've ever heard anyone argue about why DST time in Winter would be a bad thing. But I also never actively seek out arguments on either side.

    47. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with having just your business shift their schedule?

      What's wrong with shifting your own schedule? If it's bright out at 4 AM, maybe you should just get up at 4 AM and do your yard work or TV-watching then. Think of work as an afternoon thing.

    48. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      What we *COULD* do is have everyone south of about 45 degrees on DST year 'round, and everyone north of it on standard time year 'round.

      Or just redraw the time zones so they include more northwest areas and less northeast areas.

    49. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      The sun is setting at 3.50 or so here at the moment. So it'll be dark at the end of the day regardless. The hour of light in the morning is useful in the winter, else it'd be rising at 9.10 and setting at 4.50 with winter 'summer time' (I'm British, it's British Summer Time not DST for us). I understand for those at lower latitudes it isn't obviously good. It's light 'til after 9pm in the summer with BST too. So I personally like the change.

    50. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity all the Godless communist hippy snowflakes who hate long, warm evenings in the spring and summer.

    51. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Point is they run to a schedule, usually the same throughout the year. Without the adjustment for summer time you would have different schedules if you wanted the benefit that summer time brings. Then people might change schedules at different times and it all gets very confusing. There is little economic or energy benefit but at 52 degrees north it does feel necessary.

      Schools are also an issue, people tend to have to fit work around children. There are a bunch of good economic reasons why keeping to roughly the same clock is useful to many industries and personal schedules.

      The sun rising after 9 here in a winter summer time is problematic, it would also set before 5. In the summer it would rise at 3.30 on GMT and set at 8.30. It makes sense here. It may not be saving any daylight but it does make it more available in summer and possible to see in the winter.

    52. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      People used to think like you. Then trains came along. Then more trains. Then came the eventual collisions, deaths, and other big bummers. Collisions were stopped by more accurately syncing up times across ever wider areas. Unfathomable numbers of people's lives were saved.

      You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. Of course we need a time standard. It's just that what label you give to the hours doesn't matter, as long as people agree on what those labels are. "Year-round DST" (what poster I responded to was proposing) is identical to "year-round standard time", except you have a different name for what you call the hours. Calling a particular time of day "8AM" or "9AM" shouldn't make a difference to anyone.

      In any case, it should be obvious that the result of year-round DST probably won't have the effect that its supporters think it will. It's not like God came down and said "thou shalt work from 9 to 5;" it's a consequence of the schedule when the majority of people are waking up and going to sleep. If you go to year-round summer time, people's schedules may move earlier in the short term, but eventually they will start adjusting their schedule later. And then someone will propose the bright idea of moving the clocks forward an hour during the summer...

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    53. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      The idea of ditching it int he winter is to return some daylight to the morning. I think it was originally for farmers, but nowadays I'd rather they had light for the morning commute rather than the evening one - drowsy, miserable morning drivers going to work in the dark... what could go wrong?!

      So yes, but keep the standard time all year round instead. So what if we turn the lights on instead of having daylight at 10pm? Lighting today is a lot more energy efficient than the past.

    54. Re: Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vote for splitting the difference and call it a day.

    55. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      The sun rising after 9 here in a winter summer time is problematic, it would also set before 5. In the summer it would rise at 3.30 on GMT and set at 8.30.

      No matter how you shift that clock in the winter you're not going to be able to get up at sunrise and still have any sunlight after work. Actually, I'm pretty sure if you go any further north, you're just not going to have daylight in the winter, period.

      Also, why is that problematic in the first place? If you actually do any work that requires daylight, your schedule is going to be following the sunrise anyways, and not DST. The DST would need to shift 6 hours each year (at your latitude) if it needs to follow the sunrise. For everything else, we have LED lights.

    56. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Being a SAD person it being light in the mornings I find helpful. It gets light at 7.30/8 at the moment and I ride to work without needing lights which is nice. For that very reason I wouldn't move much further north...

    57. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Daylight Saving Time is a great idea.

      Do it yourself, pal. Don't impose it on others. DST means more time for leisure, in increases energy spending (because woken people spend more energy).

      We could just as well make a voting among smokers about reducing cigarette prices.

      > Ditching it in the winter is the problem. Just keep it year round and eliminate the stupid changing.

      I know you're trolling, but some idiots might make the same proposal. In a word, NO. People have different internal clocks. Having a single time for everyone is already bad, but if need to standardize the hour, we should make it in a way that lessens harm to everyone.

      Of course, we could have asynchronous activities and that would be even better -- but we're not there yet.

      DST is:
      a) favoring people who wake up early (usually lazy ones who leave work from the previous day to be done);
      b) favoring less work (because people are eager to get away from work... because "it's still daytime");
      c) favoring people who want night ones to just "wake up earlier" (is there a limit for human stupidity?)

      So, to sum it up, DST has to die. The sooner, the better. Some people have 25h internal clocks, no "time" will work.

    58. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      I'd definitely recommend installing automatic lights at home if you haven't already, or look into actual light therapy. You can't do much about the earth's tilt anyways so adjusting your own environment is the next best thing.

    59. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      The argument against is more light in the morning - we "fall back" and suddenly it gets dark (round here at least) at 4pm, but... its light at 8am. If we kept DST all year round, it would be light at 5pm, but it would still be dark at 8am.

      Originally the extra light in the morning was to help farmers who get up early (IIRC), but today its more about the commute. the morning commute is already pretty scary, now imagine all those drivers shouting at each other, still drowsy, hung over, etc, but driving along in the dark.

      An extra hour of light in the evening during summer... meh, big deal. An extra hour of light in the morning during Winter... really is a big deal.

    60. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Literally none of those operate on a 9-5 schedule!

      Literally all those things are based on a standard job being 9-5 (with the exception of the hospital.) The bakery opens an hour before iconic work time so people can get breakfast on the way to work, and for a few hours afterwards because that's when people prep for dinner (also, that probably fits two 8 hour shifts, because they clean up in the evening and have to bake in the morning). Light Rail is based on the idea that people are most likely to be sleeping (and least likely to be going to work) between 1am and 5am. The baker, for instance, is on a 5am train to have time to bake to have time to open.

      Here are a few more: Bars tend to have "happy hour" from 5-6 or 6-7, cause that's when people coming home from work will visit them. Most non 24-hour stores are open until 8-10 so people can stop by after work.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    61. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with having just your business shift their schedule? What's wrong with shifting your own schedule? If it's bright out at 4 AM, maybe you should just get up at 4 AM and do your yard work or TV-watching then. Think of work as an afternoon thing.

      So my personal schedule has to be shifted by a couple minutes a day, my business has to be likewise shifted, and the personal and business shifts have to be shifted based upon the latitude of the persons and businesses in question? Then add to that the mix of different places on the globe not being in the same Day/Night state as mine.

      This is like a return to days of youre when most people were subsistance farming, and the limits of commerce were the local horizon. But the qorld is a lot smaller place. Sunrise and sunset in a oblate spheroid that wobbles should not be the determinant of local time, or at least it simply cannot be tied to sunrise/sunset.

      At present, we have Universal Time, which used to be known as Grenwich Mean Time. A slightly different way of calculating the two but more or less the same. Aside from the inevitable arbitrariness of when to set the 0 hour and where to set it, UT works well enough. I know that 0000 UT is 7:00 PM local time, during Eastern Standard time. I simply subtract 5 hours. During DST, I subtract 4 hours.

      I suppose that in the pure Libertarian state, anyone can set their own personal time, because no one tells me what to do, but an arbitrary system of arbitrary hours and arbitrary seconds has to become a standard at some point. Now is it perfect? Hell no, that's why we have things like Daylight savings time.

      Daylight savings time might seem pointless in areas of lower latitude, but at higher latitudes, there is a much larger swing in length of the day. Today in Key West Fl, the daylength is 10 hours, 37 minutes and 2 seconds. Bangor Maine today is 8 hours, 47 minutes and 41 seconds. Anchorage Alaska is 5 hours, 28 minutes, and 20 seconds. Just about half of Key West's daylength.

      Try applying your metric to that range of times. I can imagine someone from Key West trying to communicate with someone on a business or military matter and trying to compute the times they can call based upon the local day/night cycle.

      As another fun issue, I'll note that the Winter Solstice in Anchorage is 5 hours, 27 minutes, and 50 seconds, that is 13 hours and 54 minutes shorter than the June Solstice. That's almost like adjusting to Swing shits - which people don't do very well. As well, the sunrise and sunset times are different depending on the day. The earliest sunset in Anchorage this year was on December 16th, (3:40 PM) and the latest sunrise in on Tuesday december 26th, (10:15 AM) Neither of which are on the shortest day.

      Most cures for Daylight savings time are worse than the problem of daylight savings time. If we try to finesse the whole thing, we either end up with a locally controlled mess, or pick a minute by minute difference - or finer - in microtime zones.

      Good luck.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    62. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I'm of the opposite opinion. Keep standard time year round. Leave the meridian at noon. Otherwise AM and PM have no meaning.

      You are aware that almost nowhere the actual meridian is at 12:00? Abolish time zones altogether!

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    63. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Morlark · · Score: 1

      This hits the nail on the head exactly. In past years, there have been multiple (apparently serious) proposals in the UK to move to year-round DST. People seriously want to change their clocks so that it no longer matches an obvious and unmissable astrological phenomenon that they see every day.

      Nobody ever seems to point out that this is functionally identical to just getting up an hour earlier every day. Instead, it seems that people would genuinely prefer to still get up an hour earlier anyway, but deliberately set their clocks wrong to pretend that they're not getting up earlier. There's some bizarre mental contortions going on there.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    64. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But people would slack off if we did that!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    65. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      If you work until 5pm, and it gets dark at 5:10pm, you've swepnt all your daylight inside. If it gets dark at 6:10pm, at least you have a bit of daylight.

      Here at the leading (left) edge of EST. December 21.2017, daylight arrives at 7:15am. By 16:00 (4pm) its dark.
      I would prefer that the savings time be the time all year around. Thus daylight at 8:15am when the kids are on the way to school, and at 3pm when they leave and have 2 full hours to play outdoors.

      Whoops!! Kids no longer play outdoors. They go home to use their cellphones with texting, facebook, etc. That is why they are so many fat kids.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    66. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by toddestan · · Score: 1

      How about we get rid of the notion that people work 9-5 while we're at it.

      I agree. Almost no one works 9-5. Possible exception would be first shift for shift work, but that's more commonly something like 7-3. Standard office hours are now 8-5 with an unpaid hour lunch.

    67. Re:Eliminate Daylight Wasting Time by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      But why would we keep the DST? All that other stuff should be rescheduled an hour later. If you want schools to go with the later time, then have them start at 9:30 instead of 8:30, and have kids activities start an hour later. Have businesses start an hour later than they currently do, and have lunch breaks an hour later. You get the same thing without having to lie with clocks.

  2. ok lithuania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what time is it???? its time to see what the ROCK is COOKING

  3. And Heart Attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    say the longer evening daylight hours in the summer help save energy and bolster productivity.

    How much productivity is lost due to the additional cardiac events? Maybe the proponents might consider the dangers of mornings, and Mondays.

  4. Neato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neato

  5. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot readers are pretty educated, if only because we know that's where Lithium batteries come from.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  6. EU law by manu0601 · · Score: 0

    I was not aware there was an EU law on daylight saving.

    1. Re:EU law by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's harmonised to make trade easier. All countries charge on the same day, although they still have their own timezones.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:EU law by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Is it harmonized in the sense that you have to do it? Or in the sense that if you do it you must do it on these dates?

      I can remember when the UK wasn't in alignment, you you'd be on the same time as Paris for a week at one end, and out by two at the other. And now, thanks to Nigel Farage we'll be able to do it again! That'll stick it to the boche!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re: EU law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having read the directive, it only harmonizes the dates and that DLT is offset 60 minutes. Not that member states must have it. However all member states have it and it would be difficult to be the only state not observing it.

    4. Re: EU law by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      it would be difficult to be the only state not observing it.

      Why would it be difficult? More than 150 states are not harmonized with EU and they seem to do fine.

    5. Re: EU law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, Lithuania is part of the EU, so that is not an argument. The amount of complaints that would be generated because of not being synchronised with the rest of the EU members when they have been in sync the last 20 years would be quite a lot.

      As much as I hate DST, this is one question where the whole Union moves together or not at all.

    6. Re: EU law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every person in the EU assumes that DST happens on the same day all over the EU. Currently to schedule a meeting we give the time and time zone if applicable, no one want to deal with discussions on whether or not you are using DST or not.

      This is always a discussion point when we have meetings with non-EU customers (which are a minority). You say it is working fine with all 150 countries having different rules, I would argue it isnâ(TM)t working fine.

    7. Re: EU law by aix+tom · · Score: 2

      At least that should be made simple by software. The meeting time should be UTC in the database, and both the client making, and the client receiving the meeting data should handle the conversions.

      On the other hand, the synchronisation between Outlook and Sharepoint doesn's even handle DST correctly. When we tried that, our team birthdays wound up being from 23:00 to 23:00 in one half of a year.

    8. Re: EU law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it be difficult? More than 150 states are not harmonized with EU and they seem to do fine.

      That is because it mostly only matters when you are dealing with someone close.
      If I order stuff from the US I don't really care what time it is, because I know that they are either asleep or at early morning so they will process my order later on. Delivery times will not change depending on what time I put the order in.
      When I order stuff from China they have already left work so I won't get a response until the next day.

      When I deal with Germany or the UK it is a different matter. Then I known that if I put the order in before 16pm on their time they will have it packed the same day so I can get it delivered to me the next day.
      If I miss that deadline I would have to wait another day.

      With different DST it would be a bit more to keep track of.
      Still manageable but I would probably keep a post-it note on my monitor to remind me of the current deadlines.

    9. Re: EU law by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      that's interesting - because if member states do not have to have it, why is Lithuania not just scrapping it regardless. Having been to Lithuania (great place BTW, go try their beer) they still have more in common with Russia, which has its own ideas about DST, so I doubt it really matters that Lithuania would be disadvantaged by not being compliant.

      maybe its one of those "you don't have to do as we say as long as you do as we say" rules the EU has :-)

    10. Re: EU law by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Why would it be difficult? More than 150 states are not harmonized with EU and they seem to do fine.

      That is because it mostly only matters when you are dealing with someone close.

      ...

      When I deal with Germany or the UK it is a different matter. Then I known that if I put the order in before 16pm on their time they will have it packed the same day so I can get it delivered to me the next day.

      You know what's odd about that story? Germany and the UK are one hour apart.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    11. Re: EU law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are probably interested in having the same time as Estonia, Latvia. Estonia would like also to have the same time as Finland who shares integrated communities at the border to Sweden (and dealing with a fixed 1h offset for these is quite enough) who really like to have the same time as Germany and Denmark, and.... the chain goes on...

      Now, it turns out that there is a quite useful discussion club that all those countries are members of, where they can discuss these issues. Thatâ(TM)s right, the EU.

    12. Re: EU law by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Know what's odd about you? You can't see the phrase "their time".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Oh gezz - not AGAIN by buss_error · · Score: 2

    Remember the Java DST bug?
    How about the SWIFT hiccup when the time change got applied backwards.
    Or how much it costs to update ever single time zone file on every computer in the world.

    I am not advocating for or against DST - I'm advocating for pick you're poison and stick with it. Changing it and mucking around with it is expensive, consumes time I should be spending solving other problems, and is annoying.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re:Oh gezz - not AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think its a good test to show what a pile of shit java has become

    2. Re: Oh gezz - not AGAIN by famebait · · Score: 1

      If you could get all countries to drop it it would save big in software development over time.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    3. Re:Oh gezz - not AGAIN by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't remember that bug but I do remember management making us test everything extensively when DST was changed in the US to a different schedule. And they were right to make us test it too, but everything worked - except for the 3rd party software that was used for timeclocks which fortunately wasn't my problem.

      Somehow telling hourly workers in the fall that they would get repaid for that extra hour when we "sprung forward" in the spring wasn't acceptable. Imagine that.

      But when I think about all the time and effort that goes into implementing and testing DST schemes as well as time zones I can't help but imagine it is a huge drain on the world's economy (not to mention the health effects).

      Even when I lived in Arizona I wasn't immune to this nonsense. The mantra was that if people on the East Coast were at their desks by 8 AM (eastern time) I either had to be at the office by 6 AM or 5 AM depending on whether DST was in effect or not.

      You mean I have to get up an hour earlier because THEY changed THEIR clocks? Goddammit.

      TBH, I'm not even sure if DST is during the summer or the winter. Others have suggested it before and I know it sounds radical but I'd be in favor of everyone adopting UTC or Coordinated Universal Time as well as adopting 24 hour clocks. For me, sunrise would be at 14:27 today. I can live with that. Everyone in the whole world could at least agree on the time!

      The sun rising at 14:27 is no more strange a concept than the fact that Australia and other countries in the Southern Hemisphere are going to celebrate Christmas in the middle of summer.

      --

      A couple of years ago I was frustrated because I was doing a phone interview for a position in Central Time being handled by a recruiter in Eastern Time while I live in Mountain Time.

      It's like they had no concept of time zones.

      "Your interview is at 1 PM."

      "Okay, is that my time, your time or the interviewer's time?"

      He seemed annoyed that I asked. Shouldn't it have been obvious? I'm curious what time zone others would guess was right if faced with that.

    4. Re:Oh gezz - not AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      normally when someone says "at 1 pm" they mean at "the more important person's time." if you're calling United's call center in India, that means your time. if you're talking about an interview time, it's the hiring manager's time. of course you need to confirm but better to say "is that 1 pm central time"?

      #ContinuingEducationForAspergers

    5. Re:Oh gezz - not AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow telling hourly workers in the fall that they would get repaid for that extra hour when we "sprung forward" in the spring wasn't acceptable. Imagine that.

      Back when I was hourly and working through the time shift in the fall, we clocked out at 1:59 AM EDT, the clocks were changed and we clocked back in at 1:00 AM EST. Never had an issue.

  8. A small sign of sanity ... by quax · · Score: 0

    ... in an out of control world.

    1. Re:A small sign of sanity ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was just a blip. Won't happen again.

  9. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Slashdot readers are pretty educated" Ha. Generalizations like that are why education won't fix stupid in my lifetime.

  10. Daylight Saving Time in the USA by WindowsStar · · Score: 0

    Yes, leave it on Daylight Saving Time all year round. The long summer nights with the sun out until 10pm is great! Sport Lovers, Campers, and Outdoor People Love it. I like it that way too, you get a lot done in those evening hours.

    1. Re:Daylight Saving Time in the USA by jensend · · Score: 2

      Gee, why not go on quadruple savings time then? You can have the sun out until 1AM!!

      Or you could simply admit that DST is just a silly attempt at self-deception to get ourselves to do things earlier. If we want to do things in the sun after work, we need to go to work early and get out of work early. Lying to ourselves about the time is one of the most ridiculous ways imaginable to try to do this.

      12 noon should be left as close as possible to true solar noon.

      In future years, the idea that the government mandated that people lie to themselves about the time will seem as bizarre as the strangest medieval legal customs seem to us today.

    2. Re:Daylight Saving Time in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody wants the sun in your eye at 1AM after you've been drinking all night

    3. Re:Daylight Saving Time in the USA by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

      Unfortunately, I am somewhat skeptical of most people's ability, particularly those in power that would legislate on the matter, to think rationally enough to come to that conclusion.

      After all, it's so much more fun to make laws based on what "feels right", isn't it?

    4. Re:Daylight Saving Time in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . If we want to do things in the sun after work, we need to go to work early and get out of work early.

      That works for those that can choose their work hours - which, however, is far from all of us ..

    5. Re:Daylight Saving Time in the USA by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Gee, why not go on quadruple savings time then? You can have the sun out until 1AM!!

      Because there are only 24 hours in a day Because that isn't the point of DST.

      Or you could simply admit that DST is just a silly attempt at self-deception to get ourselves to do things earlier

      No, it is an attempt to allow people to have daylight while they are doing work. This requires working within the fact that in most places, daylight is many hours longer in the summer than in the winter. During early spring before we move to DST, it is getting daylight at 4 AM. The concept that we're supposed to adapt to the local day night cycle of every place on earth just substitutes a much more complicated adjustment then thinking of timezones. I deal with East Coast to West Coast communication all the time. I don't call them before 11 AM my time, and they don't call me beyond 2 PM their time.

      Now when tying the whole thing to daylight/darkness in each area, you have a real mess. Even in my case, there is a fair difference between say San Diego and Seattle.

      I had an assistant who couldn't figure that stuff out. When I was on travel to the West coast, he would call me as soon as he got into work at 0730-0800. Nothing like getting woke up in the wee hours. Told him after the tenth time that unless it was an emergency and I had to make the decision, he would either have to make it or wait until 11 AM. Or find a different place to work. . If we want to do things in the sun after work, we need to go to work early and get out of work early. Lying to ourselves about the time is one of the most ridiculous ways imaginable to try to do this.

      12 noon should be left as close as possible to true solar noon.

      In future years, the idea that the government mandated that people lie to themselves about the time will seem as bizarre as the strangest medieval legal customs seem to us today.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  11. Re: Notice the weak winter Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me help you out. Spacetime is flat. The Earth is roughly spherical.

  12. Clearly what we need is a compromise by lazlo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's my proposed compromise: Keep the "fall back", but get rid of the "spring forward". Sure, it might take some getting used to, but I'm sure we'd manage it sometime over the next 24 years or so.

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
    1. Re:Clearly what we need is a compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just add 15 minutes to each day. Then everybody gets to sleep in an extra 15 minutes.

    2. Re:Clearly what we need is a compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's the scoop: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time

    3. Re:Clearly what we need is a compromise by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The usual argument for DST is that we get an extra hour of sunlight. I say we shift the clocks a full 24 hours for a full extra day, and avoid the 1-hour jetlag. OTOH, it would be a bitch if the extra day happened to be a Monday.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  13. Ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's *DAYLIGHT SAVING*, not *DAYLIGHT SAVINGS*. It isn't a bank! Get it right!

  14. If it does save energy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it is the green thing to do. Just PROVE that it does indeed save energy. With everyone now using LED bulbs I bet it does not save as much as it did in the past.

    1. Re: If it does save energy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our energy company claims that the energy savings are minor (I guess it hurts the monopoly they have in my country). Anyway, the trains either wait for an hour or arrive an hour late, you have to add exceptions everywhere and people have hard time adjusting to a new time.
      IMO we should adjust to the changing length of day gradually, which would require bussinesses to gradually change working hours, which isn't under current socioeconomic paradigm practical. So just get rid of it.

    2. Re: If it does save energy... by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      This is a horrible idea. People, pets and farm animals have internal clocks. If we would use your suggested sliding time everybody would all the time try to adjust and never be in sync.

    3. Re: If it does save energy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just suggesting that we work during the daylight and sleep during the night. Adjusting the start of the day by few minutes wouldn't hurt anyone.

      I agree that it is not feasible, though.

    4. Re: If it does save energy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the savings are minor why bother at all, sliding or not? Just stop tinkering with the clocks

    5. Re: If it does save energy... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Probably better to change the time we start work to be an hour after sunrise. Then we've all got an excuse for being late :-)

    6. Re: If it does save energy... by Muros · · Score: 1

      That's crazy. Sunrise time changes by more than 4.5 hours over the course of the year, more for people near the poles.

    7. Re: If it does save energy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if your clock is based on the sunrise, then sunrise happens at the same time every day!

  15. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by quenda · · Score: 2

    If you think slashdot readers are especially stupid (a not unreasonable observation) you have not had much contact with the broader population.

  16. Re:I don't care one way or the other ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > Just please stop bringing up this discussion every couple of months.

    wat?

  17. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jingoists masquerading as nerds.

  18. one hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keep moving ahead one hour, once a year.

  19. Wonderful hatefact from a tribal chief by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    “Only a white man would believe you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket.”

    Daylight saving time does strike you as something that only a progressive era, white intellectual could think of rather than something simpler like changing school schedules.

    1. Re:Wonderful hatefact from a tribal chief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      “Only a white man would believe you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket.”

      The sewing exercise would be pointless, but shifting the blanket could be worthwhile if it reduced heat loss...

  20. Good luck with that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Daylight savings is being kept around because it the extra hour of daylight is an extra hour of shopping. You're going to have a powerful lobby of retail chains fighting against ending it. It's similar to why we can't have good public transport: if you could get around easy you'd be less likely to stop at a restaurant for dinner. In the days before chain stores and restaurants people didn't think this way, but when you do stuff on the scale the chains do then all sorts of silly evils become worthwhile. I remember finding out that my town refused to build an express way to route around a 3 year highway closure because the local fast food owners paid off the city council to stop it. You'd be amazed how much local corruption there is.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Good luck with that by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Ever been in Paris?
      Or Berlin?

      Removing DST will not change a jota on shopping or restaurant habbits.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  21. Status quo bias by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Economical LED lams made Daylight saving time change obsolete.

    It just brings confusion into our lives and adds complexity to computer systems.

    People are obliged to repeat trillions of times "do not forget to change time tomorrow" for no rational reason, but just because populists are afraid to change anything due to the Status quo bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  22. Get rid of wintertime, then by johannesg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find summertime to be much more pleasant anyway. But joke's on them: after the last switch to wintertime I never changed my hours. So now I go to work at 7:30, instead of 8:30. Sure, it's still dark, but at least I get to go home in daylight... Unlike the official time zone, which would have me arrive in the office and go home in the dark.

    1. Re:Get rid of wintertime, then by Max_W · · Score: 1

      I need more light in the morning though. I often wake up at about 5.

    2. Re:Get rid of wintertime, then by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's the problem. I already do this. My partner wishes she could do this. Not all of us can arbitrarily chose our work times.

  23. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by johannesg · · Score: 2

    Shows what you know then. They only have the hottest women of all of Europe.

  24. Changing timetables by romiz · · Score: 1

    We could stop changing clocks. But it won't necessarily change anything to the way we live. For example, the train timetables in France before implementation of summertime changed twice a year, with summer and winter service. The summer service usually ran one hour earlier than the winter service. Of course, this also not limited to trains, so there was already something like a summer time implemented. Note that Lithuanians could use this, changing their schedule around the legal change to keep using the same solar time.

  25. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a new /. poll: Your highest level of education completed? 0. Still in high school, 1. Did not finish high school, 2. high school, 3. associate's, 4. bachelor's, 5. post-graduate certificate, 6. master's/Diplom/similar, 7. Ph.D./D.Phil./other ISCED level 8, 8. professional (M.D., LL.D., etc.), 9. post-doctoral (Habilitation, etc.), 10. trade school, 11. Something I'll explain in the comments. I've submitted a number of polls, but they never get chosen. Maybe someone else will have luck with this!

  26. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    polls require honesty. this is faggot town full of russian spambots paid to suck trump's dick. polls can't work here, we can't have nice things. restrict IP's, then we'll talk.

  27. Policies should be based on evidence by peppepz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are many things that "people" find annoying, and would probably be overwhelming against them in opinion polls: paying taxes certainly, but also dying in car accidents because of working in the dark. Decisions shouldn't be taken by the people's belly; they should be based on rational evidence.

    1. Re:Policies should be based on evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing DST to taxes is pretty far fetched.

      But let us hear it –what are your rational evidence for keeping the current policy?

      You know it is not illegal to start working at 07:00 eat lunch at 11:00 and go home at 16:30. Why not just change the hours we do things at rather than moving the arms of a little device?

    2. Re:Policies should be based on evidence by peppepz · · Score: 1

      We are social animals: our lives are intermingled with the lives of the other persons with whom we interact. In particular, we can't just choose to go to work earlier or later arbitrarily, because our timetables depend on the timetables of others: means of transportation (trains, buses, airplanes), factors of production (markets, banks, factories), people who will be our customers, people who will be our competitors, people whom we will be working for, people who will be working for us, people who will be working with us. So most people have no freedom to decide when to work. On the other hand, governments have neither the power nor any technical means to tell everybody when to work. Even if they could, supposedly in the case of an authoritarian government and a society that is perfectly receptive to its directives, the net result would be the same that we can achieve in the real world by simply shifting the hands of the clock.

  28. Re: Reaction from most slashdot readers by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

    You're showing a complete disregard for the complicated history of the Baltic region. Which has me assuming that your American.

    Yes, the Baltic states were part of the Soviet Union. But not by choice.
    Historically, the Baltic states are closer to central Europe then to Russia, and after the end of the Soviet Union they realigned with western Europe and are members of the EU and NATO.

    So no, they're not "covertly meddling in the affairs of other countries". Quite the opposite. They are in constant danger of Russia meddling with their affairs, as for Putin they are parts of his Russian Empire that he wants back.

  29. So annoying by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ... most people find it annoying to have to adjust their clocks twice a year.

    Set your clocks ahead one hour, then six months later set them back - so annoying.

    Thankfully, there are so many other things we get to do way more often.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  30. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    50%: what, Lithuania is a country? other 50%: what, Lithuania is in Europe?

    No, it was a British ocean liner sunk by q German submarine in World War I.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  31. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My only education is CowboyNeal.

  32. Re:I don't care one way or the other ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then shouldn't you be rooting for abolishing the DST? The discussion ends, when it's done.

    Captcha: lighting

  33. Not for them to decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the great powers of Europe may decide on this and any other important topics. Small nations must only obey. Verstanden, untermensch? Gaszimmer fuer Sie!

  34. They'd be better off by Chrisq · · Score: 0

    They'd be better off keeping summer time all year long. In non agricultural societies more light in the evening is more valuable than light before you get up.

    1. Re:They'd be better off by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      Agricultural societies don't give a damn what the clock says and operate when it gets light out and go home when it's dark.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  35. It was only intoduced again after the oil-crisis by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Because some people claim that there is some vague energy saving aspect to it.... which has never actually materialized.

    France was the first EU country to introduce it in 1976 and Swiss was the last one in 1981. There were earlier attempts at it, but those were luckily only short lived.

  36. Finnish parliament by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    recently voted in favour of the same, after a citizen initiative. For years there has been a general argument that there's nothing Finland can do, since the EU dictates everything, and not following their rules would make us look really bad. But now we're finally pushing the issue via our MEPs.

    I guess it makes it easier to work with timezones when all EU countries switch at the same time. However, to really harmonize things, why not have UTC (or possibly Central European time) across all EU? We only have something like 3 adjacent timezones anyway, and natural solar time has already been ruined by summer time.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Finnish parliament by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      However, to really harmonize things, why not have UTC (or possibly Central European time) across all EU? We only have something like 3 adjacent timezones anyway, and natural solar time has already been ruined by summer time.

      Two clocks are useful to everyone on the planet who goes outside. One is UTC, with no DST. The other is delta from sunrise. A smartphone can give you that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Finnish parliament by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Because it is inconvenient for the people living in the eastern and western zone.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Finnish parliament by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      UTC has no DST anyway.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Finnish parliament by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Because it is inconvenient for the people living in the eastern and western zone.

      Spain lies almost entirely West of Greenwich, yet it uses CET. There are probably other examples, but this one is pretty obvious when you look at maps of Europe.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Finnish parliament by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes, and?
      Portugal uses GMT ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re: Finnish parliament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, blame the EU, standard answer. The EU does have a directive stipulating when summer and winter time takes effect, not that it must be observed. However, Finland would not want to get rid of DST unless Sweden does the same, and Sweden does no want to get rid of it unless Denmark and Germany does it. So, the EU does not decide these things at the moment, but they could possibly add additional legislation that abolishes DST.

  37. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    That's only applicable for US readers. European readers will instead consider other aspects of Lithuania.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  38. Personal time by Rank+Outsider · · Score: 1

    We have the technology for every individual to keep personalised local time, just like we used to with sundials and local time for every village - midday is when the sun is at its highest for me. And we have the technology to make that work and do all the coordination stuff. It just involves some good hard analysis to work it all out to make it work. All of your undoubted objections are just a list of things to analyse and work out. It ca be done!

    And imagine the continuous wave of new year's eve fireworks around the globe.

  39. Re:It was only intoduced again after the oil-crisi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The energy saving aspect is totally gone. Most of the (household) consumption during the day is from air-conditioning, with evening lighting only taking up a small part since the switch to LEDs. DST should now be called DWT.

  40. EU Dictators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only in Fascist EU does an independent nation state have to ask permission to change their own laws.

    1. Re:EU Dictators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This nation proposes that everybody else change theirs as well.

  41. Standard Time all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight Saving Time is a great idea. Ditching it in the winter is the problem. Just keep it year round and eliminate the stupid changing.

    As someone who live in Toronto, Canada, DST in winter would mean sunrise at around 9 AM in the morning. And the places even north of us (i.e., most of the rest of Canada) would have it even later (Edmonton, AB @ 10).

    No thanks.

    Why can't we just have Standard Time year-round? It is after all the time it should be (hence the name).

  42. My cat by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    It was December 17th when my cat finally stopped getting mad that dinner was suddenly an hour later.

  43. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin

  44. Re:Reaction from most slashdot readers by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    you have not had much contact with the broader population.

    Everyone should be required to work in retail, similar to how the Israelis compel military service. Nothing got me through enginerding school like the motivation of my retail experience. ~

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  45. Lets fix the solar calendar while we are at it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    30 days has September, April, June, and November. February has 28, and the rest have 31...Really?

    How about 13 months of 28 days each with one extra - New Years Day.

    Since 28 is divisible by 7, we can assign the weekdays to specific days. The first day of each month will always be Monday.

  46. Lithuanians are smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go Lithuania!

  47. Re:I don't care one way or the other ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So true. This is the lamest argument ever, and Slashdot just loves to rehash it.

  48. Yes, pleeeease. by dddux · · Score: 1

    Scratch that thing and hang the one who pushed for it, please. If he's not already dead. It's annoying and completely stupid. Time is a stupid concept anyway. We all have our own biological clocks and those are most important.

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti