Slashdot Mirror


The Lower Your Social Class, the 'Wiser' You Are, Suggests New Study (sciencemag.org)

Wisdom -- the ability to take the perspectives of others into account and aim for compromise -- comes much more naturally to those who grow up poor or working class, according to a new study by social psychologist Igor Grossman at the University of Waterloo in Canada and his colleagues. Science Magazine reports: To conduct the study, Grossmann and his graduate student Justin Brienza embarked on a two-part experiment. First, they asked 2145 people throughout the United States to take an online survey. Participants were asked to remember a recent conflict they had with someone, such as an argument with a spouse or a fight with a friend. They then answered 20 questions applicable to that or any conflict, including: "Did you ever consider a third-party perspective?" "How much did you try to understand the other person's viewpoint?" and "Did you consider that you might be wrong?" Grossmann and Brienza crunched the data and assigned the participants both a "wise reasoning" score based on the conflict answers and a "social class" score, then plotted the two scores against one another. They found that people with the lowest social class scores -- those with less income, less education, and more worries about money -- scored about twice as high on the wise reasoning scale as those in the highest social class. The income and education levels ranged from working class to upper middle class; neither the very wealthy nor the very poor were well represented in the study.

In the second part of the experiment, the duo recruited 200 people in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, to take a standard IQ test and read three letters to the Dear Abby advice column. One letter, for example, asked about choosing sides in an argument between mutual friends. Each participant then discussed with an interviewer how they thought the situations outlined in the letters would play out. A panel of judges scored their responses according to various measures of wise reasoning. In the example above, thinking about how an outsider might view the conflict would earn points toward wisdom, whereas relying only on one's own perspective would not. As with the first part of the experiment, those in lower social classes consistently had higher wise-reasoning scores than those in higher social classes, the researchers reported today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. IQ scores, however, weren't associated one way or another with wise reasoning.

5 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. Skin in the game by ilguido · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's what N N Thaleb calls skin in the game: https://medium.com/incerto/on-... .

  2. Re:Easy peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I got Obama phone!! Obama gonna pay my mortgage!!

    Keep Obama in president!!

  3. Re:Easy peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why was this modded down?

    That's ***exactly*** what this inarticulate woman said, and was a response to the GP ---

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio

  4. Re:Another "great" article by rjnagle · · Score: 4, Informative

    In a recent feature on This American Life, Betsy DeVos was depicted as being a very compassionate and generous person (she helped individual students to get private schooling), but lacking empathy (she didn't understand the multiple issues with public schools and the diverse population and the regulatory frameworks for the public school system in the US. Also, she didn't appreciate the need for scalable solutions). MORE: https://www.thisamericanlife.o...

    --
    Robert Nagle, Idiotprogrammer, Houston
  5. Re:Easy peasy by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    It might have something to do with the fact that the Lifeline phone program (which the woman called "Obama phone") was started under Ronald Reagan and expanded to mobile phones under George W. Bush. It was already a done deal before Obama became President.