Slashdot Mirror


MoviePass Adds a Million Subscribers, Even if Theaters Aren't Sold on It (nytimes.com)

From a report: As streaming services like Netflix and Hulu surge in popularity, movie theaters have been trying to compete by rethinking the concession counter and installing seats that resemble beds. Yet attendance was flat at North American cinemas in 2016, and analysts are predicting a 4 percent decline in 2017, bringing ticket sales to a 22-year low. Perhaps something more radical is necessary. Mitch Lowe, a Netflix co-founder, certainly thought so when he took over a ticketing firm called MoviePass in June 2016. By August of this year, when MoviePass introduced a cut-rate, subscription-based plan -- go to the movies 365 times a year for $9.95 a month -- Mr. Lowe had been declared an enemy of the state. "Not welcome here," AMC Entertainment, the largest multiplex operator in North America, said in an indignant August news release that threatened legal action. It may be time to get on board: MoviePass said this month that it had signed up more than one million subscribers in just four months (Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source). It took Netflix more than three years to reach that level when it started selling low-priced subscriptions for DVD rentals in 1999. Spotify was relatively quick, at five months in 2011. It took Hulu 10 months to reach one million later that year. "We're actually shocked," Mr. Lowe said. "We seem to have hit a nerve in America."

122 comments

  1. I don't get it by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    If the theaters like AMC don't support it, how am I supposed to go to the movies?

    I would totally be in if this becomes as easy as Netflix though.

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    1. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's really insane is the theaters not realizing small income from tickets will likely translate to people spending more at concessions. So they're turning their noses up at more customers spending more money they actually get to keep versus the current shrinking ticket sales and concessions.

    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      AMC may not be supportive of it, but I use mine at my local AMC theater all the time. You check in with the app, go to the counter then use it like any other MasterCard. Unless the theater specifically tells employees to look at people's cards and then tell them they won't accept a MoviePass branded Mastercard, I don't see how they can prevent it.

      It'll also never be AS easy as Netflix just because it requires a smartphone with a GPS signal and good data reception. I frequently have to go stand outside our theater to get it to log in then go back and stand in line because our ticketbooth is on the bottom floor of a large building.

    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMC doesn't necessarily *like* it, but I'm still able to use MoviePass at their theaters. They grumbled loudly but never actually shut MoviePass out.

    4. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMC actually accepts MoviePass. They just no longer give you Stubs points when you use it.

      MoviePass is actually a MasterCard that you use to pay for the movie. The only requirement is that you have to reserve the movie ticket on the MP app before the purchase (and you must be within 100 yards of the theater to do the reservation)

    5. Re:I don't get it by Jaime2 · · Score: 2

      MoviePass issues you a debit card. You use the debit card to buy a ticket. They can't refuse the card without violating their agreement with MasterCard. In my area, not one theatre has an arrangement for direct electronic payment with MoviePass, so I always use it as a debit card.

    6. Re:I don't get it by registrations_suck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't get it either.

      1). The movie theater "experience" still sucks - mostly due to the audience. Loud sound systems and small screens don't help. If they don't fix that, even going to the movies for FREE isn't much of a value proposition as far as I am concerned.

      2). The content itself largely sucks. There's only maybe a maximum of 3 movies/year I want to see anyway. This year I saw three, and only TWO of those three I liked (++ to Planet of the Apes and Rouge One, -- to The Last Jedi). There is no way there is enough interesting content for me to go 365 times/year, or even once per month. Once again, if they don't fix that, even going to the movies for FREE isn't much of a value proposition as far as I am concerned.

      3). I don't even bother going to the movies anymore unless I can get reserved seats where I want to be (not well-supported by MoviePass) - AND I tend to buy my tickets (on Fandango) LONG ahead of time too. MoviePass can only be used to buy same-day tickets. So, fuck that.

      4). Apparently, can only be used to buy one ticket. So if you go with your wife, you both have to have MoviePass, and do two separate purchases...so you may or may not be able to get two reserved seats next to each other....in addition to having to do everything twice. So once again, fuck that.

      Final analysis: for me, this is a completely useless product...even if it were available for free.

    7. Re:I don't get it by gnick · · Score: 1

      This year I saw three, and only TWO of those three I liked (++ to Planet of the Apes and Rouge One, -- to The Last Jedi).

      Blade Runner 2049. You didn't see Blade Runner 2049. Go see Blade Runner 2049. If you liked the original, you'll like 2049. If you didn't like the original, watch it again until you do.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    8. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This year I saw three, and only TWO of those three I liked (++ to Planet of the Apes and Rouge One, -- to The Last Jedi).

      What was "Rouge One" about?

    9. Re:I don't get it by Vairon · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, if the theater does not support it then there's a movie pass debit card that you can swipe at the box office. It activates to allow the purchase of 1 ticket after you tell the moviepass app that you plan to see that movie at that theater.

      IOW, the theaters don't have to support it in order for you to use it.

    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jedi makeovers.

    11. Re:I don't get it by tsqr · · Score: 1

      This year I saw three, and only TWO of those three I liked (++ to Planet of the Apes and Rouge One, -- to The Last Jedi).

      What was "Rouge One" about?

      A plucky band of rebellious cosmetics makers on a secret mission to steal the Empire's plans for a planet-destroying mascara brush.

    12. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the original, didn't care for the 2049 one all that much. And yes, I did follow all the intricies and things in it that only someone who really knew the original well would have caught.
      Sometimes the writers attempt to be so unpredictable, it becomes painfully obvious. Just listen to the "lawyer" words the girl uses and you figure it out near the beginning of the movie.

    13. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MoviePass only has to partner with the theaters to support eTickets. If you buy the tickets in person, it is just another MasterCard to them.

    14. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to do it as two separate purchases, you just pay separately for now. Ring it up as one and have them split the purchase. They charge half to each Debit card and you sit together. It's not too complicated for them, groups often pay separately.

    15. Re:I don't get it by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Blade Runner 2049 and Wonder Woman were both visual feasts, but they were both also guilty of committing audio assault, as their effects track battled to be louder than the score.

    16. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the same as episode 4? Got it.

    17. Re:I don't get it by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      I thought the original Blade Runner sucked. I doubt I will watch the new one for free on Amazon Prime if/when it appears. I certainly wouldn't pay to go watch it in the theater.

    18. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw it. It was crap. I watched the original to purge the shit 2049 out of my memory.

      2049 was a shit sequel to blade runner and left more questions at the end. also there are massive plot holes and the evil guy, wallce, was a total fucking douche who made no sense. luv sucked too.

    19. Re:I don't get it by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      AMC may not be supportive of it, but I use mine at my local AMC theater all the time. You check in with the app, go to the counter then use it like any other MasterCard. Unless the theater specifically tells employees to look at people's cards and then tell them they won't accept a MoviePass branded Mastercard, I don't see how they can prevent it.

      I would guess that refusing a specific legitimate MasterCard would violate their merchant agreement and tehy probably don't want to mess with masterCard. If they are so worried about MoviePass devaluing the movie experience then use the added attendance to show people that going to a movie can be worthwhile so tehy comeback when MoviePass goes bust. Use this as away to build some interest while you take MoviePass' money.

      If I were at AMC I'd tray to track the added revenue from MoviePass in terms of concessions, etc bu getting people to link the AMC rewards to their MoviePass card, and then see if the added marginal revenue makes it worthwhile to cut a deal with MoviePass to keep people coming more often.

      I can studios being worried if it cuts into the box office and thus their revenue and blockbuster box office PR.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    20. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ++ to Planet of the Apes and Rouge One, -- to The Last Jedi

      It's hard to tell these days if anything is good or bad. I thought Rogue One was okay (it has problems), but a damned sight better than The Force Awakens, which was actually worse than the Prequels.

      I'm still waiting to see Last Jedi. I can't imagine it's worse than Force Awakens.

    21. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even seen episode? No, in episode 4 they USED the plans stolen in Rogue One. Not the same.

      Rogue One is a rather decent movie

    22. Re:I don't get it by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      ooh, #3 and #4 are deal killers for me as well...
      #3: I'm a single dad, I plan my outings days in advance at least, this includes buying the tix.
      #4 I have kids (in light of above statement Duh!), no way we're all risking sitting apart from each other.
      #4a, perhaps you can just use multiple cards in one transaction? Given the other limitations, I'm not sure this would work though.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    23. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had moviepass, you wouldn't have to pay... Checkmate :P~~~~

    24. Re:I don't get it by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      it requires a smartphone with a GPS signal and good data reception.

      Why in the world does it need to know your physical location?

    25. Re:I don't get it by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      If you didn't like the original, watch it again until you do.

      How many times does it take? I've seen it three or four, and still hate it.

    26. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Concession prices are a ripoff. I'll sneak my concessions in, thanks.

    27. Re:I don't get it by gnick · · Score: 1

      I saw it when I was like 8 and it was the greatest thing in the world. I wasn't even focused on the 2 seconds of boob, it was just the best thing I'd seen up until that point. That stuck with me. I'm biased. Watching 'The Last Cut' still feels hollow to me because the first time I saw it there was a voice-over.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    28. Re:I don't get it by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's my problem. I was too old (about 14) when I first saw it...

      (Note to fans of the movie -- I'm in no way saying it's not a good movie. It's just not a movie I personally enjoy.)

    29. Re:I don't get it by porges · · Score: 1

      You're entitled to your taste, but if the only movies you were interested in seeing -- for an entire year -- were 2 Star Wars movies and 1 Planet of the Apes movies, I would describe your position not so much as "The content itself largely sucks" but more as "I'm not interested in theatrical movies." You're a HUGE outlier.

      (with you on 3 and 4, though.)

    30. Re:I don't get it by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Something smells here.. im guessing the theater AMC will just charge the card full price. Moviepass is taking a full hit. that wont happen for very long im guessing. Sense they wont get reimbursed by AMC. I cant see Moviepass staying in business for very long. Subscribers are going to loose, MP will just go bankrupt paying full movie prices at chains who wont deal. So they had a substandard year "Theaters" they still made billions in profits lol

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    31. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It needs your physical location so it can put the right amount of money on the card for the movie that you're seeing. They may also do a merchant check to make sure that you don't "check in" and then spend the money at a nearby store.

    32. Re:I don't get it by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Because the real money is when they start to sell all the data they collect on the open market. At least that's what they're selling the investors.

      Personally I think this is a failed endeavor. I can easily see them bleeding 10s of millions a month at current movie prices.

    33. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be within 100 yards of the theater to load the ticket to your MoviePass MasterCard. This deters you from sharing your MoviePass and giving a friend a ticket while you are at home. (They figure you aren't likely to loan your personal phone to someone for 3-4 hours.) It also prevents you from purchasing a ticket in advance. You have to go to the theater. The movie you want to see could be sold out. Each MoviePass is tied to one individual.

    34. Re:I don't get it by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      You're entitled to your taste, but if the only movies you were interested in seeing -- for an entire year -- were 2 Star Wars movies and 1 Planet of the Apes movies, I would describe your position not so much as "The content itself largely sucks" but more as "I'm not interested in theatrical movies." You're a HUGE outlier.

      I will clarify my position. There were only 3 movies in 2017 that I was interested in seeing *enough to drag ass to the theater and put up with the shitty movie theater experience*, rather than just wait to see it at home on Amazon Prime or whatever. If the content were MORE COMPELLING (i.e. sucked less), I would be more inclined to go put up with the shitty movie theater experience. I watch plenty of movies at home. And yes, I know I'm a huge outlier. I get that (:

      You don't have to do it as two separate purchases, you just pay separately for now. Ring it up as one and have them split the purchase. They charge half to each Debit card and you sit together. It's not too complicated for them, groups often pay separately.

      According to MoviePass, each "user" needs to use their own phone. Multiple purchases with the same phone on the same day violate the ToS.

    35. Re:I don't get it by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yes, this was my suspicion. I did a little research, and it's clear that data mining is pretty much the entire purpose for MoviePass.

      Sounds like a terrific reason to avoid the "service" to me.

    36. Re:I don't get it by geoscodin · · Score: 1

      You can still buy a ticket in advance. I've gone to the theatre, bought my ticket, then gone to lunch or whatever, and then come back for my showtime. No problem.

    37. Re:I don't get it by geoscodin · · Score: 1

      I use mine at AMC all the time and they've never so much as frowned about it. I'm also a Stubbs member so I bring my $4.49 popcorn bucket and get my free drink upgrade. I've seen 8 movies in the past 2 months and bought some kind of concessions each time. When I pay full price for a ticket, I go to the movies much more seldom and sometimes skip the concession line altogether. So the theatre is making money on me that they would otherwise never see.

    38. Re: I don't get it by geoscodin · · Score: 1

      AMC gives me Stubbs points at the ticket booth and concessions. Regal gives me Crown Club points for both too.

    39. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would work fine, it's just a MasterCard. Have the theater split the transaction like any group would do.

      Technically there is nothing preventing you from purchasing a ticket for another day or showing, as long as the price is the same.

    40. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Costco can sell a Snickers for $0.48/ea and still make a profit, why can't the theater?

    41. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last Jedi had a lot of "feel good" moments, distracting cute creatures, and loads of fighting. It was enjoyable. But it wasn't a good movie, Disney movies are never actually good movies they're just nonsense emotional distraction.

      You can't expect Casablanca from everyone, and emotional trash still has it's place

    42. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who go to the movies three times a year are not worried about assigned seats, so your argument makes no sense.

  2. Theaters should be thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the money they make is on concessions anyway.

    1. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not wrong, but that isn't exactly the whole picture. If it were, then ticket prices should be dirt cheap. I suspect that the studios demand a certain amount per ticket regardless of how much the theater chooses to sell a ticket for, meaning if tickets are priced too low, they end up paying the studios more than they took in.

    2. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That still doesn't quite explain their disinterest in allowing MoviePass though as MoviePass pays the full ticket price from what I understand. I suppose it's possible that they're afraid that in the future as MoviePass grows it will begin demanding special rates, at which point it could very well begin cutting into their cashflow, but the simple solution to that would be to start their own subscription service and limit MoviePasses market share. In any case theaters need to innovate somehow or they're going to end up going the way of drive-ins.

    3. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMC stated their objection very clearly. They said that the business model wasn't sustainable, and worried that when MoviePass went under consumers would be used to $9 a month unlimited and would be unwilling to pay the normal price for a ticket.

    4. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about their business model is overly unsustainable? Despite the hype your average person isn't going to go to a movie every day throughout the year. I would guess their average "customer" (see product) will go to 2-5 movies per month, and while that is more money than they will get in revenue from their customers directly that will likely be far from their only revenue stream. They pretty much certainly intend to sell their customers usage data to various concerns (advertisers, movie studios, etc), I also would bet on addons/"services" in the near future that they will use to extract more money from their customers than the advertised $9.95.

    5. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Not really, I seldom see people spending $12-15 per person on food. Ticket prices bring in the most cash. And people who go to matinees are cheap bastards.

      That's not to say the food is super over priced, but it's not the lions share of revenue.

    6. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      2-5 movies a month is $10-50+ dollars out of investors pockets each month. 4+ times revenue! How is that sustainable?

    7. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Not really, I seldom see people spending $12-15 per person on food. Ticket prices bring in the most cash. And people who go to matinees are cheap bastards.

      That's not to say the food is super over priced, but it's not the lions share of revenue.

      I know I'm an outlier....but....

      We saw The Last Jedi over the weekend. We (2 of us) saw it at Alamo Drafthouse. Besides the $20 we spent on tickets, plus the $3 (or whatever) Fandango fee, We spend $60 on dinner at the theater, plus another $15 or so on beer after the movie started. Plus tip. Overall, that is about $100.

    8. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Ya, most people don't go to dinner theaters and it is hardly considered a concession. When you start adding that in the movies are no longer just the movies. And you likely don't do that for every movie you go see, or 2-4 times a month like many movie pass people do going to the traditional movie theater.

      Or if you do you have enough money to really not care too much about the ticket price either way.

    9. Re:Theaters should be thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically the ticket price more or less goes straight to the studio. The money from the concessions go to the theater.

      Different studios do demand different amounts, but theaters usually don't charge different amounts depending on the movie. So for some movies the theaters will be able to keep some of the ticket, and others may be at a loss, but it averages out. One thing the theaters are worried about with the Disney/Fox merger is that Disney will throw its weight around (as it likes to do) even more and really put the squeeze on the theater.

  3. The real money is in pop corn by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    In theatres they make more money in pop corn soda candy sales than ticket sales.

    I am sure lots of theaters will sign up for this plan.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re: The real money is in pop corn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They lose nothing and actually make money.

      MoviePass actually feels like watching the movie for free (one movie a month is enough to cover the investment), which in turn means people are more likely to spend money on the concession stands.

    2. Re:The real money is in pop corn by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      I think they don't want this to get traction and wide acceptance. Right now, MoviePass is low-friction, allows you to go to any(?) theater, and no one is the wiser. In a year, when 5 million people are using MoviePass and MP shows up at AMC and says, "You need to give us a discount, or we're going to block your chain." then AMC is in a bad position, because it will be the only chain not supported by MP. Chains don't want to be commoditized because they lose a lot of say over how they run and price their businesses.

  4. Theaters shouldn't care... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the theaters perspective, it's just a debt card. They get the full ticket price. What people should be asking is how MovePass plans on even breaking even, much less making any money. It seems like they're doing the "I'll sell you this crummy quarter for that shiny dime" thing...

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they make money on people who forget they are signed up for it. My parents had the same Netflix disks for a year before they returned them.

    2. Re: Theaters shouldn't care... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Not quite that bad, but movie pass once they get subscribers up can. Then negotaite with theaters to $7.99 a ticket and while one person may go 3 times a month on average over a year the average person will only go once every two months and the whole thing breaks even.

      Very small percentage of people stay on top of their monthly subscriptions well enough to get full value from them.

      Me I pay for Amazon prime, and I probably barely just break even on it over the course of a year. Bonus since I signed my fiancee onto the family share plan she gets my prime account too. So it is slowly moving into solid black for us.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just in the short term though. The venture capitalists are losing money right now paying full price for everyone's ticket, with the intention of collective bargaining in the future. Once they have a large enough userbase they'll be able to go to theaters and say hey, we're only gonna pay you X amount per ticket you sell through MoviePass, but they'll have so many subscribers by that point theaters will agree to it to get butts in the seats and buy concessions. That's the plan, anyway. Theaters can resist it if they want but only time will tell if movies theaters turn into a F2P game with popcorn as the microtransactions.

    4. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rarely watch movies.
      But If you watch movies, you should get in before the inevitable MoviePass bankruptcy. Though I would not buy any year subscription...

    5. Re: Theaters shouldn't care... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They don't need to bargain with theaters. If they bargain with the studios, the studios will dictate terms to the theaters. Whether they bargain with theaters in the short term, I suspect the goal is to deal with the studios, who get most of the ticket revenue anyway.

    6. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably the plan is to fill seats. If movie theaters are typically full, in theory it should be possible to charge less and make more.

      Of course this also invites the airline problem. If the only way to make more money is to have more people in the theater, the move towards large recliner seats will be quickly reversed. All the movies you want for $10/month so long as you don't mind seating like a budget airline.

    7. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the movie industry should stop charging 12+ bucks a ticket.

      Price elasticity, and all that.

    8. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think analytics are part of it. Movepass knows you. How old you are, gender, geographical location, etc. Every time you go see a movie using MoviePass, they add to a profile. From there, they can use those stats to sell to producers, studios, advertisers, etc.

    9. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by gnick · · Score: 1

      I think they make money on people who forget they are signed up for it.

      And gifts. I never would have bought a subscription for myself; I don't frequent the theater nearly enough to justify it. But I have one for a year because my brother dropped $90 at Costco. I intend to see more movies in 2018 than I did this year, but MoviePass'll probably still come out ahead. This year I saw Blade Runner & Flatliners. Flatliners was just because I had a buddy with a pass. Blade Runner did justice to the original. Flatliners did not.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    10. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind paying $50 per movie, if the movie theatre had the same rules as an acting theatre, i.e. only numbered seats, no eating and drinking inside the auditorium, and ushers that remove people who pull up cell phones or otherwise distract others.

      Going to the movies is not an experience anymore.

    11. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wouldn't mind paying $50 per movie"

      Lemme guess, you only want to watch the artsy movies, and don't give a shit about the action movie tentpoles.

      "Going to the movies is not an experience anymore."

      What's next - the damn teenagers need to get off your lawn?

    12. Re: Theaters shouldn't care... by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Me I pay for Amazon prime, and I probably barely just break even on it over the course of a year.

      It isn't easy to compare Prime with MoviePass.

      Prime includes benefits in shipping, on-demand video, music streaming, and more. It's hard to compare (even in retrospect) exactly how much is saved with prime, since people often won't pay separately for those things, and when they do the cost savings isn't always the same each time (e.g. expedited shipping).

      For something like MoviePass, it's much easier to ensure you go to the movies enough to get your money's worth. Just make sure it's greater than ($9.95 * 12) / TICKET_PRICE.

      For my theater that means I need to see 11 movies a year to break even. That's more than I care to see, so I'll pass. Pun intended.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    13. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess, you only want to watch the artsy movies, and don't give a shit about the action movie tentpoles.

      You guessed wrong. I like action movies. And I like watching them without being disturbed by those who don't give a shit about others. I wouldn't mind if there were separate $5 showings for the plebs, and $50 showings for those of us who want to enjoy movies without uncouth interruptions, whether visible, audible or olfactory.

    14. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what it is. Helios and Matheson analytics bought a majority stake in MoviePass, the same month the price dropped.

      I don't get the "what people should be asking" bit to this. As a consumer, I don't care if they are unprofitable and eventually go out of business. Assuming I've watched at least one movie a month while paying for the subscription, it's not throwing away money.

    15. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately economics is against you. If standard price is say, $10 and they offer this $50 "VIP" showing that means they have to bring in 20% of the audience size to break even. I'm pretty sure there is less than 20% of the population is willing to spend 5x the price for a movie simply to avoid the crowds.

      That is, they're willing to forego your $50 if it means 6 people who are happy to pay $10 will show up instead.

    16. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately economics is against you. If standard price is say, $10 and they offer this $50 "VIP" showing that means they have to bring in 20% of the audience size to break even. I'm pretty sure there is less than 20% of the population is willing to spend 5x the price for a movie simply to avoid the crowds.

      Most theatres these days are multiplex theatres and show several shows at the same time. If they put up their biggest hit as a reserved $50 movie too, instead of their least successful movie, they only need to bring in more money than their least successful movie did with people paying a fifth as much.
      Say their least successful movie played for an audience of 20 paying $10. If showing their biggest blockbuster instead for $50 a ticket, they only need five guests to make it a win.

    17. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla lose $600,000,000 in a quarter making cars, something that plenty of companies make considerable profits on. The justification is that the losses now are establishing a business that will be profitable in future. Obviously it is impossible to know whether it will work out. The logic here is almost certainly the same, grow your customer base while accepting you will need to take a hit for things like this. Once you have an established base you start making more favourable deals with chains or even distributors and/or competing with chains that won't do deals.

    18. Re:Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The economics isn't as simple as that. The cost of showing a film can be fixed, but is more often a percentage of revenue, and can even be a combination. For major releases the % of revenue that has to be paid for screening can be very high. This is where the slightly overstated argument that cinemas make their money from drinks and food comes from; and although it is over stated it is a big consideration. Thus a screen with 300 people spending $3,000 on tickets and $3,000 on drinks and food is vastly more profitable to a cinema than a screen with 60 people spending $3,000 on tickets and $600 on food. A screen with limited seating, even at high prices, with restrictions on food and drink is completely useless to a cinema chain.

    19. Re: Theaters shouldn't care... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      the average person will only go once every two months and the whole thing breaks even.

      If you're going to the movies that infrequently, then why would you sign up for MoviePass? It would cost you more than just paying like a normal person.

    20. Re: Theaters shouldn't care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they are counting on people using it a lot less than they think they will. As well as putting it on auto-bill and forgetting about it. I would also guess that making it really hard to cancel once signed up is also part of their business model.

  5. but at say -$5-15 per person with this by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    but at say -$5-15 per person with this at the gate maybe not. At least with cash sales they give out 95%-99% of the gate at least they get to keep a bit to cover CC costs.

    1. Re:but at say -$5-15 per person with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The theatre gets exactly the same $ from a MoviePass customer and any credit card customer. Full price. It's the MoviePass company that is eating the loss, by burning up investor money.

    2. Re:but at say -$5-15 per person with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're hoping customers in Nebraska lower cost of living states will help offset the prices for those in high cost states. They also plan on selling your data, since unlike YouTube or Facebook that know you watched a trailer, they know that you actually went to the movie.

    3. Re:but at say -$5-15 per person with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie theatres worry that once people get used to paying 10 for all the movies they want, they will not go back to paying 15 dollars/movie when MoviePass goes bankrupt. Once a habit is broken, it is hard to reestablish it. And there is no way consumer data is worth enough to subsidize tickets. And I doubt many people that watch 4 movies/year are buying this pass. The gym model is based on people changing behavior (i.e. going from sloth to working out). The movie pass is people doing what they have been doing (i.e. seeing movies). The big problem is the moviepass probably isn't going to drive new traffic (i.e. people that wouldn't watch movies because of price but who will go and buy popcorn now that the cost of the ticket is say 1/8th of what it is) as much as cannibalize it (i.e. I go from paying 60/month for tickets down to 10).

      And yes the profit in movie theaters is in popcorn. But that is because tickets pay for the overhead (salaries, movie rental costs, and the rest). You can't reduce the ticket income and expect to stick around.

  6. Not for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh. I only go to the theater that also has meals. I spend 3x ~ 5x the ticket price on food (but not on popcorn/soda/candy). This 9.99 plan wont save me anything on tickets. $10x2x12=240$. I spend around $120/yr on tickets. For others I am sure it would be a great deal.

  7. It's not a nerve by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    You're selling a gift card. With a lot of publicity. It's a good deal (if you believe the company can honor its plans). That's why. With Netflix or Hulu, you had to sell a new experience/good. That meant convincing people why they want it.

    I bet I could get over 1M customers real quickly with a $10/mo gets you all the fast food you can eat. It would literally be people who spend $10+ a month opting for a cheaper option.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re: It's not a nerve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Obamacare and Medicaid.

  8. This would fill theaters.... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ... with noisy, distracted fuckwits who didn't really value the experience. It'd also become 2 hour daycare.

    1. Re:This would fill theaters.... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      ... with noisy, distracted fuckwits who didn't really value the experience. It'd also become 2 hour daycare.

      So... nothing will change, in other words.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  9. Fix Hollywood.... by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet attendance was flat at North American cinemas in 2016, and analysts are predicting a 4 percent decline in 2017, bringing ticket sales to a 22-year low. Perhaps something more radical is necessary.

    How about good movies - that aren't reboot #13 of some long worn out franchise that you are squeezing for every last penny, licensing fee and take-down notice you can wring out of it?

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Fix Hollywood.... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Add to that the number of Hollywood stars who think their opinion is more important than mine, to the point that they choose to insult half the country who don't think like they do.

      I'm fine with Susan Sarandon being a left wing liberal. It's not my business that she has other opinions than mine. It's fine that I think she is factually incorrect on certain topics. As long as she says what she believes, and lets others do the same, I have no issues with her. Hell, we even voted for the same candidate* last year. :^)

      But for all the ones that want to insult the large portions of the country that don't agree with them, I have made the decision I am not paying my hard earned dollars to pay for their next mansion, or trip to Tahiti, or diamonds and pearls. I saw three movies in the theater this year, Rogue One, Guardians/Galaxy 2, and Moana. I plan on seeing the remaining Star Wars 2 or 3 movies (haven't seen Last Jedi yet), and then maybe never going to the theater ever again.

      *See my sig.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    2. Re:Fix Hollywood.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And start the movie on time. No 45 minutes of previews. If you want to watch previews then have a separate "advertizing" theatre that plays them non-stop. And have the theatres buy a sound system that works properly.

    3. Re:Fix Hollywood.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theaters just aren't that good of a user experience. The sound is often distorted as if everything is shouted. The bass is way too loud. Every pin dropping on the floor doesn't need to result in a roll of thunder. Looking at a screen that big at that far of a distance kills emersion because it feels like you're watching video on a giant wall, which you are. They might have been able to reposition it the way the intercontinental passenger ship industry converted to "cruises" marketing at middle income after the 1% all switched to airplanes to cross the ocean. The problem is people with middle class aspirations would rather spend their cash on a nice home theater, rather than go to the mall and rub shoulders with the unwashed. Another problem is the theater industry spent decades promoting going to the movies as a social event. You go the movies on a date, you go to the movies with your kids, etc. but most of the time we consumers just want to watch a movie after work on Tuesday night, but if you stopped at the cinema on your way home from work you would feel stigmatized for going alone, meanwhile there's no shame in coming home, flopping on the couch and loading Netlfix. They need to run a marketing campaign telling consumers it's ok to go to the movies by yourself as an impulse buy, instead of as some planned out date with other people.

    4. Re:Fix Hollywood.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't actually seen a movie with anyone in several years, and most of my watching is "watch a movie after work on Tuesday night" since my local theater does cheap movie Tuesdays. If anything, I haven't seen a direct stigma against solo movie viewing (though usually romcoms are designed for couples), but I have seen stigma for large groups, since they tend to make the most noise/cordon off entire blocks for stragglers.

      If they added an option for $5/month for 2 drinks with each ticket I'd be all over this, since my nearest theater opened a bar inside.

    5. Re:Fix Hollywood.... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Actually making good, original movies would go a long way. Also, find a way to make physically being in the theater actually enjoyable. The "theater experience" often ruins perfectly good movies.

  10. The problem is... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    The problem is that going to the movie theater is a terrible experience (excepting for those small indie theaters -- they've mostly figured out how to make the experience a good one).

    Making a bad experience cheap doesn't actually make it better. If we're talking about the likes of Cinemark, AMC, etc., $10/mo is still overpriced.

  11. Not worth it by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Even at $9.95 a month, MoviePass is still too expensive. I look over movie trailers pretty frequently and it's more of a wasteland than Netflix Streaming or YouTube. There are maybe 3-4 movies in a year now I even care to see at all, much less drive somewhere to see. There are many more Netflix originals now that I am more interested in seeing than almost all movies produced.

    I feel really bad for the theaters as it's not their fault that Hollywood continues to suck harder and harder.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. Yes theatres are dying. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    Saw Star Wars 8 in widescreen 3d opening weekend in a theatre with 20 people. If that can't put butts in the seats...

    On the other hand I dropped $100 for four people with tickets and popcorn, so maybe they only want us to visit once a year - just that empty seat showing could have netted them $2k.

    1. Re:Yes theatres are dying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MoviePass doesn't cover 3D or Imax movies.

    2. Re:Yes theatres are dying. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Saw Star Wars 8 in widescreen 3d

      There's your problem. People have started to figure out that 3D sucks.

    3. Re:Yes theatres are dying. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Saw Star Wars 8 in widescreen 3d opening weekend in a theatre with 20 people. If that can't put butts in the seats...

      Hell, I saw it opening *night*, and there were fewer people than that in attendance.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:Yes theatres are dying. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The theaters need to figure that out too. When I saw Star Wars 8, as you might guess there was only a handful of screens showing the movie in 2D, and a bunch showing the movie in 3D. The 2D screenings were packed. There was plenty of room in the 3D screenings. Which tells me the theaters need to reduce the number of 3D screenings and add more 2D screenings. However, given that the theater gets an extra $3 a ticket (or whatever the 3D surcharge is), I'm sure part of it is the theaters are hoping if the 2D screening is full people will just go to the 3D screening and pay the extra money for something they don't really want.

  13. We have something similar in France by Orphis · · Score: 2

    We have something similar in France. It's about 20 euros per month to get a card that let's you go to the cinema as many times as you want. There's also a 30 euros one for the card holder and a friend (works great for couples).

    Since they started doing that, they fill all the screenings, sell so much more popcorn that they never really considered removing them. It is worth it for them!

    I'm surprised by the low price though, how do they manage with less than $10 per month? From experience, going to the theater once always costed more!

    1. Re:We have something similar in France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much of our country has cheaper ticket prices. I could go see Jumaji for $9 in Omaha, or $12.45 in Portland. Real3D in Omaha is cheaper than the normal ticket in Portland.

      That is one way they're hoping to make money. The other is by selling data. They know about you, and they know your viewing habits better most. Viewing data is valuable, it's one of the reasons most theater chains have a rewards card.

    2. Re:We have something similar in France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for explaining this, I didn't understand how they made money.

  14. installing seats that resemble beds? by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

    They should try Installing seats that resemble flush toilets. This is a no brainer, don't know how this idea won't save movie theters from dying out.

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  15. Re: Important question for the left by Type44Q · · Score: 0

    The statistical fact is that if you stopped persecuting Blacks, they'd stop committing crimes.

    By your "logic," stoners quit smoking weed after it's legalized.

  16. I don't understand the business model by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    How much does the theater get per admission? You can't just flash a card like Dr Who that says let me in. And for AMC you supposedly use it like a credit card which means AMC is charging these people full rate. So go once at ~$15 a ticket and they are under water.

    I can make up lots of good deal plans and likely get 1M customers, but that doesn't mean its business viable.

    1. Re:I don't understand the business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys act like this is such a new strange concept. It's the same idea behind insurance. They've done math that figures at this rate they'll get enough income from subscribers that exceeds what they payout for tickets that people actually do purchase per month with the moviepass debt card.
      Also people are going to treat it like a gym membership. Something they hang onto because they should use it more even though they don't.

    2. Re:I don't understand the business model by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The plan of course is once 90% of the movie going public goes via Moviepass, moviepass negotiates with the movie theaters for a cut or they stop supporting that theater and the theater overnight loses 90% customers. its literally an offer the movie theaters wont be able to refuse. At that point once they have squeezed the theaters for all they can and the theaters are bleeding and in the red, they can pick up the theaters on the cheap and then start squeezing the studios. Once that is done they start increasing the monthly rates a dollar at a time till they are finally making money.
      No wonder the theaters are fighting it as hard as they can. They recognize that this plan is only viable if the end game is to squeeze them.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:I don't understand the business model by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Ya, pretty certain they lose that battle in court just like AMC would lose if they refused mastercards. There's a reason the mafia isn't an actual company, what they do is illegal.

      However, upon further reading it actually appears that the plan they've been pretty forthright on is to sell customer data to everyone under the sun.

    4. Re:I don't understand the business model by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      They might be able to sue under "anti-dumping" regulation if they start trying to negotiate hardball deals with theaters.

    5. Re:I don't understand the business model by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The plan of course is once 90% of the movie going public goes via Moviepass

      If that's the plan, it's a dubious one -- depending on who you consider "the movie-going public". In 2017, only about about 27% of people who see movies in the theaters go at least once a month. If you aren't going at least once per month, MoviePass doesn't really provide any value to you (and if you go less than once per month, it's providing negative value).

    6. Re:I don't understand the business model by ghoul · · Score: 1

      90% of butts in seat not the folks who see a movie once in a while. Moviepass is happy to sell cards to those folks as its a profit to Moviepass but the core target is the folks who buy popcorn at the movies. Once Moviepass owns their loyalty then they can use them as a bargaining chip with the theaters to share some of the popcorn money.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    7. Re:I don't understand the business model by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      90% of butts in seat not the folks who see a movie once in a while.

      The majority of butts-in-seats may very well be those who see a movie once per month or less. I couldn't find numbers about that specifically, but the numbers that are readily available seem to indicate this is a strong possibility.

  17. Dolby Atmos is limmted with Netflix by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Xbox One

            Xbox One S

            Xbox One X

            2017 LG OLED TVs (need an sound system with ARC HDMI to have it work) and the TV is back feeding the sound system

    so I need to have an Xbox with live (added fee) or a very limited list of tv's to get it on nexflix.

  18. Re:Important question for the left by Altrag · · Score: 1

    The statistical fact is that if you stopped persecuting Blacks, they'd stop committing crimes

    Not really true. Crime rates are primarily tied to poverty levels more than anything. We just don't hear as much about all the white trash crime out there because its easier to be racist than to deal with problems.

    since we stopped poisoning Blacks with lead.

    Yeah, that certainly helps too. Though that was a fairly limited sample set and can hardly be applied to the rest of the country.

  19. More vertical integration by DrYak · · Score: 2

    The subtle difference, is that in France (and somewhat in other countries such as Switzerland) a substantial part of the movie theater are own by corporations such as Pathe / Guamont. which are also movie studios and movie distributor (i.e.: the whole thing is a lot more vertically integrated).

    Meaning it's much more easy for them to negociate the price of the movie ticket, because they are also the distributor of the movie.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  20. get the money elsewhere by sad_ · · Score: 1

    theaters make a lot of money on the side by selling other overpriced stuff.
    go to theatre (maybe pay for parking), next to the ticket also buy something to eat/drink.
    i didn't look into moviepass, but i'm guessing those extra's are not included in the subscription.

    you might see something like this in the future:
    drink is $5, or buy a ticket from us for $7 including a drink!

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.