Slashdot Mirror


It's So Cold Outside That Sharks Are Actually Freezing to Death (vice.com)

An anonymous reader writes: As climate change ushers in another year of extreme global temperatures -- a phenomenon President Trump seems a little confused about -- cities up and down the East Coast are facing record-breaking snowfall and subzero temperatures. But while city dwellers might be able to hide indoors and crank up the heat, some animals aren't so lucky. According to the Cape Cod-based Atlantic White Shark Conservancy, it's gotten so cold that sharks in the area have been washing up on the shore and essentially freezing to death. This week, the organization responded to three thresher sharks that likely suffered "cold shock" in the surrounding waters. Organisms suffer cold shock when they're exposed to extreme dips in temperature and can sometimes experience muscle spasms or cardiac arrest. Scientists believe the sharks swimming off the coast of Cape Cod -- where temperatures have dropped to 6 degrees -- suffered cold shock in the water, and then wound up getting stranded on the shore, where they likely suffocated. "If you've got cold air, that'll freeze their gills up very quickly," Greg Skomal, a marine scientist, told the New York Times. "Those gill filaments are very sensitive and it wouldn't take long for the shark to die."

11 of 424 comments (clear)

  1. Oceans getting colder? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought the missing heat (that which caused the pause for most of the first part of this millennia) was accumulating in the ocean...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  2. It's the environmentalists fault by ilsaloving · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's all the environmentalists fault. If they had simply stuck with global warming, we wouldn't be having this problem. But nooooo, they had to change it to "Climate Change", which opened us up to wild swings in temperature in both directions.

    I considered overly hot summers to be an acceptable tradeoff for having mild or almost non-existent winters. But now we have to deal with stupidly hot summers AND stupidly cold winters.

    Go back to global warming!

  3. Not a climate change article by unixcorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I read the first paragraph of the article - right up to where it berated our President and then I stopped. If this is about real science, and I don't deny climate change, keep the politics out of it and just state the facts. We have plenty of time to do politics here or at the bar or wherever. Also, are these temperatures really record breaking or is that just more hype?

    1. Re:Not a climate change article by Lucas123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If this is about real science, and I don't deny climate change, keep the politics out of it and just state the facts."

      This is the problem. You have armchair climatologists ridiculing the president or anyone who dares to deny climate change based on regional weather patterns, while at the same time these pseudo intellectuals likely don't know the first fact about how climate change can cause more severe weather patterns. My guess is most of them couldn't begin to explain why winters can continue to be cold, and even colder than in years past, while global warming continues to increase.

      But, sarcasm is the cheapest form of intellectualism. It requires no real knowledge while attempting to shame those with whom you disagree.

      Stick to the facts. If you disagree with someone, make a solid argument to prove your point.

    2. Re:Not a climate change article by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the problem is, most "climate change denial" is politically based. Everyone knows that climate change is real, certain people just choose to pretend it isn't real because it fits their politics to do so (and yes, some people deliberately exaggerate it greatly because it fits their politics).

      It would be nice if the issue were not politicized and we just dealt with facts., but there is a lot of attack on the science from some of a certain political persuasion, that an issue that SHOULD BE non-political, has become VERY political unfortunately. You can't detangle politics from climate change now, some people are too invested in it being political.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:Not a climate change article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't "berating the president" - it's that such a stupid, irrelevant editorial gets shoehorned into a categorically unrelated topic.

      Honestly, what is the first thing that springs to mind when you hear "sharks are freezing"? Is it Donald Trump ? Congratulations. You have an autistic fixation and your associative thinking is so broken that all thoughts invariably lead to your stupid, frustrated partisan faggot feelings.

    4. Re:Not a climate change article by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You phrased it better than I did. It was pretty awkward and shows how much free real estate he has in some people's minds.

    5. Re:Not a climate change article by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Historic averages for Boston. No it is not record lows, but maybe close. The only facts in this article is three sharks froze to death after beaching themselves for still as yet undetermined reasons. All the rest is speculation, they couldn't even be bothered to specify if it was 6 Fahrenheit or Celsius, or what the water temps are vs normal.

      The rest reads like a social media blog, news reporting is a lost art.

  4. Re:And? by dlleigh · · Score: 5, Funny

    The lasers have gotten too efficient. There used to be enough waste heat to keep the sharks from freezing, but not anymore.

    This is another unintended consequence of the environmental movement demanding energy efficiency, but not considering everyone who would be affected by their policies.

  5. Re:Two sides to that coin by Strider- · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lots of cooking of data

    Except that recalabration of data points based on new knowledge isn't cooking data, but rather valid adjustments.

    The one that many of the doubters trot out is the adjustment that was made to the global seawater temperature data sets. For decades, sea surface temperatures were measured by ships, using a temperature sensor on the seawater intake used to cool the engines. As ships crisscrossed the ocean, they would record the temperature and location as part of their normal record keeping, and these have been compiled into large data sets.

    In more modern times, the sea water temperature measurement has been supplemented by data recorded by buoys, which in turn report their data automatically. The trouble is that the two data sets didn't jive. The buoy data was showing things were slightly cooler (I think on the order of 0.25 to 0.5C) than what the data from the ships showed. If you took the temperatures at face values, it would make it appear that there had been a slight global cooling of the oceans rather than an ongoing increase, the so-called "Pause."

    So what happened? Well, the scientists went back and looked at how the data was collected on ships, and realized that even with properly calibrated thermometers, they would read slightly high due to factors from the ship itself as it travels through the water. The ship's hull, engine room, plumbing, etc... slightly warms the water before it hits the temperature sensor, causing them to read high.

    Once these factors were calibrated out, the "pause" largely disappeared. Is this cooking the books? I don't think so, but many people claimed it was.

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  6. Re:Same Ol' Argument... by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Meanwhile in Europe we have been having much too warm temperatures for this time of year. Last week it was 15C (59 F) in central Europe where I live, which is practically spring temperature today it was 8C (46F) when it should be around the freezing point.
    It's not the first time that Northern America receives all the dose of winter cold from from Europe. A couple of years ago we had the same situation - record lows in the US, much too high temperatures across Europe and Eurasia.

    Nevertheless, global warming is a scientifically proven fact regardless what happens in Northern America, which is only a relatively small area of our globe. The oceans which cover two-thirds of our planet are warming, this is fact. The polar ice caps are melting, also fact. The glaciers are retreating, another fact.

    Please just check this website of one very credible, US agency for the details if you still feel like denying it because Trump says so:
    https://climate.nasa.gov/