Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Get Closer To Replicating Human Sperm (engadget.com)

Rachel England reports via Engadget: Scientists have taken an important step forward in recreating the way the human body makes sperm, which could one day mean creating artificial sperm and eggs for infertility treatment. The researchers, from the University of Cambridge's Gurdon Institute, are thought to be the first team to have reached the "halfway point" -- a significant milestone -- on the path between stem cells and immature sperm. This pathway -- which the team are attempting to track and understand -- involves embryonic cells turning into immature sperm via a series of complex steps known as meiosis. Cells follow the same journey for around eight weeks, before taking different directions depending on whether they're to be sperm or eggs. Previously, the team had managed to track this pathway to the four-week mark. Now, using new technology in the form of miniature artificial testicles (called "gonadal organoids"), it's on track to pass this point and gain new, deep insight into the process of sperm creation. Further reading: The Guardian

224 comments

  1. open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feminists celebrate! We don't need men anymore!

    1. Re:open a box of chocolates by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It would all go terribly wrong when there were no more men, and women realized they had nobody to blame for their failures.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re: open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon we can destroy all the men! And all the faggots too. We won't have to pretend we like homo pigmen anymore just because they pretend to be like us! Girls all around!

    3. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, most women actually blame themselves, even if they're blaming themselves for following the male patriarchy.

    4. Re:open a box of chocolates by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's pretty obvious you haven't met my ex.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    5. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or my ex's "psychotherapist". No license, no training, no college degree, no clinical experience, no supervision, changed gender 4 times in 3 years, and spewing nonsense into my wife's head about the "male patriarchy" even after several attempts to join it.

    6. Re: open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon we can destroy all the men! And all the faggots too. We won't have to pretend we like homo pigmen anymore just because they pretend to be like us! Girls all around!

      Be grateful for the fags; they're the main reason why a lot of you Real Men are still getting laid instead of your lady friends trying their fingers in other boxes and they've taught a lot of your faithful women how to suck cock

    7. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might have their chocolates, but they'll never be able to open another jar of pickles!

    8. Re:open a box of chocolates by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, for instance?

      Here's the thing: everything you've ever heard about feminists is true... of some feminist somewhere. It's also false. Just like everything you've ever heard about Trump voters is true ... of some Trump voter somewhere. It's also false.

      Some mens-rights advocates have, in response to the whole sexual harassment thing, pointed out that women sometimes sexually harass men too. They were roundly mocked by feminists, but it turns out those mens-rights types have a surprising ally in their point of view: other feminists. The jargon those feminists use might sound foreign (essentialism) but they're making exactly the same point: being a woman shouldn't automatically make you a victim and being a man shouldn't automatically make you a victimizer.

      That's because any large group of people (like "all men" or "all women") is bound to have people who aren't very much alike. That's even true of people who identify with some kind of ideological label like "conservative" or "environmentalist". If there's enough of them it's always easy to cherry pick viewpoints to suit your purpose.

      People across the political spectrum love them their stereotypes and straw men, because it makes it easy to feel like you're right all the time. But this violates the most basic principle of civilized behavior: the golden rule. That's not how you want your views to be treated.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and no one to open their stuck Jar lids

    10. Re: open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary opened a jar of pickles on live TV. That's one of the constitutional tests to be President.

    11. Re:open a box of chocolates by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Holy crappe!!!

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    12. Re:open a box of chocolates by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Jeez! She's better off going to a psychic!

    13. Re:open a box of chocolates by novakyu · · Score: 1

      That's what everyone would worry about, until it actually happens and they realize that men were really the source of all the societal problems.

    14. Re:open a box of chocolates by buss_error · · Score: 1

      you haven't met my ex

      I was pretty sure you have an "ex".

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    15. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spewing nonsense into my wife's head about the "male patriarchy" even after several attempts to join it.

      Sounds like she's jealous of men, for some reason.

    16. Re:open a box of chocolates by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      I lie awake at night worrying that a vibrator and a jar lid wrench is all you need to replace men.

    17. Re:open a box of chocolates by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Also a current...who's a sweetie!

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    18. Re:open a box of chocolates by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Maggie Thatcher might disagree with you. Certainly all the people she harmed would.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    19. Re:open a box of chocolates by burtosis · · Score: 1

      I watched the Star Trek where Riker gets horribly raped by a woman. But it's ok he was raped because all men want it (Though he specifically says no just before the rape) and we all know women can't commit sexual crimes. Even afterward on the show, everyone is just fine and happy whereas if you reversed the gender roles it's textbook rape. We aren't going to get anything fixed while male rape is so funny victims can't even go to the police because thier ass will be laughed out to the curb. The golden rule only works if you use it uniformly.

    20. Re:open a box of chocolates by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Never understood this easy replacement of only males. From a technical standpoint, if you can replace one gender in replicating natural pregnancy you are pretty close to both. And after seeing several women go through pregnancy, the artificial option sure seems like it would be better for everyone.

    21. Re:open a box of chocolates by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious you haven't met my ex.

      And you picked her. Every man that has had this experience needs to read up on psychology especially Histrionic Personality Disorder. No matter how tantalizing and mesmerizing they are, RUN AWAY!

      --
      We'll make great pets
    22. Re:open a box of chocolates by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      I hear such a process is happening in Japan. Women deciding they don't need men in their lives.

    23. Re:open a box of chocolates by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      It will go even more wrong when there are no more men and women need a spider to be killed.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    24. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, no, it's not one of those poison mushroom bullshit deals about feminists. They really are that dangerous, it's just that the window has been shifted so far in the feminist direction that people no longer notice. There is no such thing as a benign feminist. And they sure as hell don't care about what happens to men.

      As far as MRAs go, feminists are definitely not on the same page there. The vast majority of the support from outside of the MRA movement from women is from anti-feminists because MRAs are more or less the main source of pushback against feminist beliefs. You can't claim that a small number of people that are only partially supporting the abuse and subjugation of men are allies because they partially support us. They don't, it's just that they're less psychopathic than their peers.

      This whole business of "not all" is a load of crap. I'm not personally a fan of post-modernism because you can't say anything at all as there's always some sort of exception to the rule. Just because there's a couple feminists somewhere that are somewhat less full of themselves, doesn't mean that we can't blame feminism for all the things that it's doing. By using the term feminist to describe themselves, they're supporting a system that uses and abuses men for female benefit.

      If it's not a large enough group of people that you can point to, it's just a way of squirming out of responsibility without having to actually do anything to fix the situation.

    25. Re: open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the only one she passed, it looks like.

    26. Re:open a box of chocolates by fredrated · · Score: 1

      What a disgusting statement.

    27. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with HPD have a high need for attention, make loud and inappropriate appearances, exaggerate their behaviors and emotions, and crave stimulation.[3] They may exhibit sexually provocative behavior, express strong emotions with an impressionistic style, and can be easily influenced by others. Associated features include egocentrism, self-indulgence, continuous longing for appreciation, and persistent manipulative behavior to achieve their own needs.

      Sounds like Trump.

    28. Re:open a box of chocolates by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Trust me, when the sex bots are nearly indistinguishable from humans, and artificial wombs and blank eggs are cheap, many men won't hesitate to remove all women from thier lives as well. I'm assuming this will probably start in Japan, they seem to be leading the way in sex robots already.

    29. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prease phone carr Miss Creo now! She answer all you prayers.
      $5.77 each minute, hold music onry $99 each minute.

      See I get you bargain.

    30. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, this is so zany that I believe you!
          Sounds like the psychotherapist is the one needing support & affirmation, and successfully gets it through clients. No one should be influenced so greatly by those in authoritative positions who need the same help in the first place.

    31. Re:open a box of chocolates by swillden · · Score: 1

      False equivalency. Oh, sure, rape of a man is equally bad as rape of a woman, but on a societal scale rape of women is much worse than rape of men because it's much, much more common. Women are raped far more often than men, so it makes sense to focus primarily on female rape. And, actually, there's every reason to expect that putting a lot of effort into addressing rape in general will help reduce both male and female rape, even if nearly all of the effort is applied to the largest part of the problem (female rape)

      Also, it should be pointed out that the reason male rape is often not taken seriously is because we're still carrying old, patriarchal gender stereotypes, which are exactly what feminists wish to erase. When women and gay men have as much social power as straight men do today, then accusations of male rape will be taken as seriously as accusations of female rape are today.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    32. Re:open a box of chocolates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to laugh at reading the first paragraph. A better, more apt term might well be Attention Whore Disorder.

    33. Re:open a box of chocolates by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was only one part of me that picked her. Unfortunately, it was getting about 90% of my blood supply at the time, leaving my brain starved for oxygen.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    34. Re:open a box of chocolates by burtosis · · Score: 1

      It's sadly not a false equivalency. Yes, it's far more common, but when you ignore these "smaller slights against humanity" you are stoking discontent and dischord among the majority in control because this affects them directly, is obviously wrong, and people use words like yours to dismiss them, building up to the division and tribalism we see today. At the proverbial psychology circle of patients, you don't laugh at someone just because thier problems aren't the worst in the room, nor do you try to make them feel bad because they had it easier than some others, nor do you bake in some kind of psuedo Christian born guilty crap. Entitlement should be referred to more often as the common decency everyone deserves, and me too will succeed when me==everyone.

  2. Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only a matter of time.
    Besides sperm, we serve no purpose.

    1. Re:Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You couldn't be more wrong. Only techbros can code apps.

    2. Re:Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I take the garbage out.

    3. Re: Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOT obsolete: men will be erased from the surface of earth !

    4. Re:Men will become obsolete by erice · · Score: 2

      It's only a matter of time.
      Besides sperm, we serve no purpose.

      By that logic, women will serve no purpose either, given artificially created eggs (which the article suggests they are just as close to replicating as sperm) and an artificial womb, which is much further along.

    5. Re:Men will become obsolete by novakyu · · Score: 1

      The key difference is this: the way X and Y chromosomes work, some of the children artificially produced from two men will be girls (and some---those with two Y chromosomes that survive---will be homicidal maniacs). But none of the children artificially produced from two women will be boys.

      So, yes, I agree with OP. This could make men obsolete---but it won't quite ever make women obsolete.

    6. Re:Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC Men, or men in general?

    7. Re:Men will become obsolete by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think it's the other way around. Men's genetic material can clone both boys and girls without a woman, because men have both X and Y chromosomes. Eradicate the Y and duplicate the X, and you get a female.
      But a woman can never clone a boy from her own genetic material.

      Similar for gay couples - once technology allows it, two men can sire both boys and girls from their combined DNA, but two women can only ever have girls. Given that more women want boys than girls, men will still be needed as donors.

    8. Re:Men will become obsolete by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      It's only a matter of time.
      Besides sperm, we serve no purpose.

      By that logic, women will serve no purpose either, given artificially created eggs (which the article suggests they are just as close to replicating as sperm) and an artificial womb, which is much further along.

      Of course women will still serve a purpose! How else will the dishes and laundry get done? /s

    9. Re:Men will become obsolete by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase it: you will never get the "woman" out of men---no matter how technologically advanced, our society will always have women; that's literally in our DNA. But you can get the "man" out of society. Barring some unforeseen catastrophe (the stuff of sci-fi), it is possible to have a technologically advanced society that only has women and no men anywhere---the structure of human DNA allows for that.

      You are presuming that men are somehow necessary (so the ability to produce a boy is a good thing). I am challenging that presumption and instead think in this direction: which gender can be eliminated? Men can be; women cannot be.

      P.S. I don't know if more women actually want boys. But preferences can change over time, and in any case, you can imagine a small society of women (again, the stuff of sci-fi) with ideological hatred of the male gender.

    10. Re:Men will become obsolete by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Wait. You define your existence by your ability to serve up sperm?

    11. Re:Men will become obsolete by gweihir · · Score: 0

      Ah, have you ever observed where a certain type of women gets their spending money from? Sure, "feminists" want men to pay for that without any compensation in the form of, say, sex or bearing children, but men are very much needed as work-slaves for these women.

      With apologies to all women that do work to earn their living and that, unlike "feminists", do support equality.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:Men will become obsolete by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I think it depends also a lot on the hormones.
      So with enough artificial testosterone even a XX whole "female" embryo should develop to a male. Not 100% sure. Definitely a "male" XY embryo will develop to a most of the time fertile woman.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re:Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only a matter of time. Besides sperm, we serve no purpose.

      By that logic, women will serve no purpose either, given artificially created eggs (which the article suggests they are just as close to replicating as sperm) and an artificial womb, which is much further along.

      Of course women will still serve a purpose! How else will the dishes and laundry get done? /s

      Robots

    14. Re:Men will become obsolete by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Of all the things to be worried about, lab grown sperm that takes over 8 weeks to produce is the least of my worries. I've got it beat by several orders of magnitude, and while my wife might wish it would take me longer, I don't think she wants it to take that long.

    15. Re:Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An women only society seems the stuff of nightmares. Not even they would want that. Interestingly enough, the better gf I had did not want to have female friends in large groups....

    16. Re:Men will become obsolete by burtosis · · Score: 1

      The DNA also allows for a male only culture since we are talking artificial births. It's just as stupid as all female. Why does everyone think that this tech is going to turn the world into a monoculture? It's far more likely to do the opposite, but at least furries will be easy to spot when they are sporting real fur.

    17. Re:Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh is THAT what you call that shit? "apps"?

    18. Re:Men will become obsolete by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Houston, Houston, Do You Read?

      (by James Tiptree, Jr. - btw, a woman who used a man's name as a pseudonym, in order to get published)

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    19. Re:Men will become obsolete by novakyu · · Score: 1

      But eliminating women takes the artificialness of the approach to the next level. Either you have to eliminate all X-chromosome-carrying sperms (and I guess somehow you made sure your artificial eggs only carried X chromosome, unless it's somehow O.K. for an artificial egg to have Y chromosome), or you perform sex-selective abortions where all girls are killed at early age. All these are active measures that need to be taken to keep eliminating women from each generation. In any generation you stop taking these measures, women are re-introduced into your male-only society.

      Eliminating men is marginally more natural. Once you have eliminated the Y chromosome, like eliminating polio, it does not get re-introduced into the society absent some overt effort by some group that regrets elimination of men.

      P.S. I'm not saying eliminating either gender is good. I am just pointing out that the situation is not symmetric. It is objectively easier to eliminate men than women.

    20. Re:Men will become obsolete by burtosis · · Score: 1

      You are thinking in 1980s terms. You simply grow eggs and replace the DNA with the donor male artificially and ideally once. Want a female (not sure why in this case)? Simply use two copies of the X. Want a male? Use both. Want some randomness thrown in from samples of your family tree? Add designer genes from popular lines to enable desirable traits. Natural will again be seen as it was in the 16th century, brutal, random and uncaring. But it gets better, tired of being a white male and want to be a full female Pacific Islander instead? Simply upgrade all your cells DNA and supplement it with a few basic nanotechnology innovations and it can be a reality on an accurate cellular level. id be quite supried if this even took 150 years, probably doable in 100 or less.

    21. Re:Men will become obsolete by tattood · · Score: 1

      I don't know, the Amazonians seem to do fairly well.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    22. Re:Men will become obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are perfectly normal men with XX, other than a few missing genes to make their sperm viable. Copy those genes over and all humans could be XX. The only real difference between men and women is gestational testosterone levels deciding how the brain structures form and how the gonads are developed.

      The more I think about the differences between genders and sexes, the more I realize there is little difference and how irrational people are. "Male" and "Female" is becoming meaningless to me outside of science, and even then is more of an abstract concept than a concrete difference.

  3. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your testicles crushed underfoot.

  4. Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1, Funny

    We need the MRA douchebags to come out and march against the elimination of the male sex! Just think....in 50 years a woman can create sperm from her own cells or the cells of a partner and when enough of them do that the male sex will end...........

    1. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. Men aren't all rape monsters as the worst feminist propaganda claims, but neither are all women man-haters.

      Just like men, women are social primates who require social connections with the sex to which they're attracted... and with 90% of the population being heterosexual, men aren't in any danger of being replaced by a lab and a Hitachi wand any time soon.

    2. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by mentil · · Score: 1

      However, the procedure is so complex, only a handful of scientists would be able to perform it. So what would really be needed is a way to automate artificial sperm production; let's call it an 'organ'. Going to a special facility that seeds the organ with source cells to create the artificial sperm would be a hassle, so why not embed this organ inside the human body? Not everyone would need these sperm-creating organs, since some would only utilize their eggs; so, only about half of the females would need these artificial 'sperm-production organs'. Now, there would need to be a convenient way to harvest these artificial sperm and get them to the target egg, since they're now produced inside a human body, and surgery is a drag. Perhaps the artificial sperm can be propelled out of the body with some force, so they can be harvested? Better yet, they can be expelled out of a probe that can be inserted into the uterus, or nearabouts, for better chances of conception.
      Of course, the sperm-bearing females should look different for optimal mate selection purposes, for those looking to reproduce, and it'd similarly be more efficient for people to prefer a mate of opposite appearance. Medical probe insertion is boring, so maybe the probe should have nerve endings so its stimulation provides interesting feelings?

      I hereby patent the above, and call it 'sex'. Any reproduction (ha!) of this idea is forbidden for the next 20 years. Pray I don't get an extension.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    3. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      An alternate prediction: both sexes will continue indefinitely, but the differences between them will be significantly attenuated over time. With most of the traditionally sex-linked tasks (brute manual labor, combat, conception, carrying fetuses to term, etc) readily outsourced to machines, a person's sex will become a minor detail, similar in importance to, say, hair-color or eye-color. i.e. mostly a matter of aesthetics, and modifiable without too much difficulty or controversy, if what you were born with is not to your liking.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With P.R. like this. Can't imagine why anyone would think that.

    5. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you go for a patent instead of a copyright? Your process includes 'creative processes', 'control over derivative works' and ''distribution' correct? With copyright, the term should extend to 90 years after your death according to current law rather than a mere 25 correct?

      Ignore the normal fertility period of a human female for a moment (man behind the curtain kind nonsense), look here instead! Its the the lead-in plot of 'Children of Men'! Civilization collapsing while the conception of a child was considered 'piracy' for ONLY 18 years!

      Only at the end did the 'pirate' save the species.

    6. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you met any of the millennials, or current college graduates? There are whole clusters of them busy attending feminist rallies, in search of female contact even if they won't admit that's why they're there, who've been "snowflaked" out of any remnant of masculinity. My daughter has worked her way through four of them, liking the sjw propaganda they spew but turning, inevitably, to boys who actually stand up for themselves. Oh, and one bull dyke, who was so aggressive *I* had to take her aside without my daughter's knowledge and explain that if she continued to be a pest, she'd answer to *me*. My daughter tried to hide the other boys: I found them anyway. and had that pleasant little talk with them that every boy needs from his girlfriend's family.

    7. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Men aren't all rape monsters as the worst feminist propaganda claims"

      Perhaps not. But the #MeToo movement has shown that there are plenty of wealthy, well-connected, educated, successful vindictive horndog scumbags in every industry.
      I saw it many times when I waited tables many years ago. Managers treated the female staff as sex slaves. One manager cheated on his pregnant wife by offering choice tables & shifts in exchange for sex. Those who refused got cut early or worked the slow days.
      Good thing for most of them that we were so busy back in the day, you could always make 1/2 decent money, even if it was only 1/3 - 1/2 of the norm.

    8. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be a piece of work, sir. I have lived with several women, and only actually one had the talk with me. But she is quite a piece of work, the family is whole nuts. No, I did not welcome the "talk" with others, and fortunately they had more sense.

    9. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Men aren't all rape monsters as the worst feminist propaganda claims"

      Perhaps not. But the #MeToo movement has shown that there are plenty of wealthy, well-connected, educated, successful vindictive horndog scumbags in every industry.
      I saw it many times when I waited tables many years ago. Managers treated the female staff as sex slaves. One manager cheated on his pregnant wife by offering choice tables & shifts in exchange for sex. Those who refused got cut early or worked the slow days.
      Good thing for most of them that we were so busy back in the day, you could always make 1/2 decent money, even if it was only 1/3 - 1/2 of the norm.

      perhaps not? perhaps not ALL men are rape monsters? Wtf are you babbling on about you fucking moron
      a handful of people in positions of Power abused their Power. Gosh, who knew. I doubt any women in similar positions do anything untoward

    10. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by swb · · Score: 1

      I think it's unlikely but not impossible to imagine some kind of synthetic sperm further altering the male/female dynamic in Western countries where women have a significant amount of economic parity.

      It's been hypothesized by many that the increasing economic independence of women has significantly altered the social landscape. Women marry later if at all due to well-paying careers. I even think the whole #metoo movement is something of a byproduct of increasing female financial power and a rejection of historical patterns of transactional sex to obtain economic or other influence.

      What does a society look like where some significant minority of women simply decide they want to live a maternal family role without involving men at all? It's only an instinct, but I suspect there is a certain proportion of non-lesbian professional women who might find this tidy and efficient, especially with the burdens and obligations of a career.

      I suspect that the impulses of evolutionary biology and a certain amount of existing social structure will keep the majority of women from completely eliminating men from their lives, but I also think it's possible men could become increasingly marginalized from women, occasional accessories rather than fixed partners.

      It also makes me wonder if there would be a counter-reaction -- is there some portion of the female population that would see a kind of social power vacuum and become more interested in men as the more aggressive and competitive women split off? We might end up with two classes of men and women -- independent women and their male supplicants, and traditional men with women who are their supplicants?

      How will it affect lesbianism? Will fewer women choose to live in long-term lesbian relationships if economic independence and free sexual choice are more easily available? This assumes that some proportion of lesbians are motivated by disdain of men rather than attraction to women.

    11. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ... group A calls for all men to be rounded up and shot (or, in some cases, tortured to death), while group B says that this is kind of mean ... and you think that group B are douchebags?

    12. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know what the #MeToo movement shows?

      That when you give women the ability to ruin men with anonymous allegations, they will use it.

      All #MeToo has done is prove to men who run businesses that hiring a women is bringing a ticking time bomb into your business.

      If you must hire a women, on the rare occasion that one has unique skills, then you need to understand what an enormous risk you are taking. Do one thing to piss her off - like tell her she actually HAS to be at work on time - and you can lose your business, your career and your reputation.

      You must treat her like an infectious disease... keep her quarantined and record every encounter you have with her. For evidence in the inevitable false allegation.

    13. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      in a polygamous species the female and males have completely different strategies though, studies have shown women rate 80%+ of men to be below average and unworthy of mating, the majority of men can drop dead as far they are concerned

    14. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      1) We're not a polygamous species, we generally engage in serial monogamy with a percentage of 'cheaters'. Polygamy results when there is an extreme power distribution issue combined with a cultural view of women as property.

      2) 99% of men rate 99% of women as 'unworthy of mating' yet there's a lot more than 1% of the species having sex and/or long term relationships. Just like men, women adjust their standards to their environment (and don't call it 'lowering', because the typical 'standards' are extremely superficial and most people mature out of them).

    15. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Men aren't all rape monsters as the worst feminist propaganda claims"

      Perhaps not. But the #MeToo movement has shown that there are plenty of wealthy, well-connected, educated, successful vindictive horndog scumbags in every industry

      And despicable behaviour of a couple of scumbags is the fault of all men because?

    16. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      ha, in an all out fight between men and women, I wouldn't bet on the women. Or, wake me up when women are winning martial arts tournaments (they won't, ever)

    17. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by swb · · Score: 1

      That's the thing. All out physical combat no longer underscores much of "winning" and "losing" in modern civilizations and women have been gradually gaining the financial independence necessary to remove their dependence on and subservience to men in our new, combat-free environment.

      They're actually more similar to female royalty in older monarchies, using wealth and power to get men to perform combat on their behalf, like mercenaries.

    18. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1 for this.

      We are at a crossroads. Either we maintain the rule of law, where men are innocent until proven guilty, and sometimes the guilty go free; or we throw out the rule of law for the sake of victim's rights, we start believing every accusation, and sometimes a false accusation punishes the innocent. The latter leads to the mob, to the mindless crowd with pitchforks and torches.

      But unlike in the past, this time the mob is spreading through the internet. The rule of law can't compete with the voices of ten thousand lying victims.

    19. Re:Quick! Call the MRA brigade! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      That's good in places where that is true,

      however your view of the world is of a subset of western cultures. And those have negative population growth, so those won't endure sad to say.

      the positive population growth is among people with more brutish treatment of women. That's whom evolution will favor. The male chauvinist pigs shall inherit the earth.

  5. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by oldgraybeard · · Score: 2

    Men are in trouble if this succeeds. Feminists are not all welcoming, open, forgiving or tolerant ;) lol

  6. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well... one man in particular. We all know who. Grabs ladies right on their fee-fee.

  7. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there some shortage? Was that in the news???

    1. Re:Why? by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      This is more of a Science win (Why did we do it? Because we could!) being dressed up in FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt). The scientists involved did it because it sounded need (make germ cells from proto-germ cells? has anyone done this? why not?), probably tacked on with some "for the people reasoning" to get the necessary funding ("Umm, it could eventually allow couples lacking reproductive organs to reproduce?? At some point, several decades in the future, after many more grants...plz...").

      Anyway, since it's not AI / Robot uprising week, or the NSA is out to get you week (and they really are), it must be Gender Wars week. So this piece of research gets politicized because le grand conspiracy of women everywhere to throw off their male oppressors using unproven technology (with the real results only coming to light 30-40 years later, when that 'tweaked' generation grows up), and that's how we got here.

    2. Re:Why? by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      "neat" not "need"

      And we can't cure cancer or AIDS, let alone create designer babies. We have nothing to fear. Unless it's idiots in backwoods garages offering 'super-baby' sperm which at best will be regular sperm, at worst someone playing mad gene splicer with human sperm (with predictably bad side effects).

  8. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PopeRatzo's comment is dripping with autism, but what else is new?

  9. 3 MORE steps before manpocalypse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 step: create a virus which kill all men on earth.
    2 step: spread it
    3 step: Amazon sells sperm on demand.

    And then, only girls are allowed to be born, with a transgenic sperm with only XX

  10. Gattaca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  11. And when they can replicate the egg.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... the continuous line of humanity will come to an end.

    Just think... in the future, generations may be born that don't have any ancestors at all.

    1. Re:And when they can replicate the egg.... by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

      So, let me get this straight. Your mom is Jeremy's fathers mitochondrial what? I thought you had his features.

      --
      "Nice Ear's" - Mr. Potato head

  12. Well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bukkake for all

  13. Bringing coal to Newcastle by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Of all the things humanity doesn't have a shortage of, spermatozoa have got to be right up near the top of the list :)

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Of all the things humanity doesn't have a shortage of, spermatozoa have got to be right up near the top of the list :)

      Really. A normal ejaculation has enough live sperm to impregnate every fertile woman on the continent.
      Even those with really really bad sperm count, you'll probably never find one that only has one live wriggler, thus requiring it to be cloned.

    2. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Of all the things humanity doesn't have a shortage of, spermatozoa have got to be right up near the top of the list

      Indeed. Males are basically ejaculation machines. If you want to "fix" something with technology that needs fixing, make hornier females.

    3. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't understand how horny women are all the time, you need to check out some David Shade, my friend.

    4. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... how horny women are, all the time ...

      I'm sure he meant "make females more desperate". IE, like men.

    5. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      In vitro yes.
      Via intercourse not so much.
      Fertilization is (un?)fortunately not as easy as sperm meets egg.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Even so, the fact that guys who can't procreate naturally are willing to spend large amounts of money on the problem drives research like this. Apparently having children that are genetically related to them is really important.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      You might even consider it a biological imperative... that is the root cause for the hormones that make men decide that having a fertile woman around is desirable in the first place.

    8. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by burtosis · · Score: 1

      I thought you were going to say "then try getting married"

    9. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      True. They chase billionaires and Beatles. If you are not a billionaire or a Beatle, they run right past you. Perhaps "make them less selective".

    10. Re:Bringing coal to Newcastle by arth1 · · Score: 1

      In vitro yes.
      Via intercourse not so much.

      Since we're talking cloning sperm, I would presume that intercourse does not come into play anyhow?

  14. Just one question by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    Are the 'Gonadal Organoids' brass? Do they come (sorry, couldn't resist) in sizes?

  15. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Feminists are not at all welcoming, open, forgiving or tolerant

    FTFY

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. Because there aren't enough humans by bruce_the_moose · · Score: 1

    This is sooooo necessary because 7.5 billion humans infesting this globe is nowhere near enough.

    --
    To reduce crime, make fewer things against the law.
    1. Re:Because there aren't enough humans by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

      Well, of course it is. As everybody knows, the 7.5 billion on the planet aren't the right ones.

      --
      And then there were two

    2. Re:Because there aren't enough humans by CaffeinatedTech · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of other planets and systems for us to infest yet I bet.

      An automated 'seed' ship could grow new humans at the right time to raise and train them before reaching a good looking planet. Assuming the ship-board AI doesn't go Skynet on the way.

    3. Re:Because there aren't enough humans by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the number of people on the planet?
      Get rid of CO2 pollution and we have no problem.

      I'm tired about idiots throwing the "over population mantra" who live in countries that clearly has no overpopulation.

      Hint: most first nations have problems with sustaining their population size, birth rates far below 2.0 kids per couple, or woman. And for some strange reason (actually not so strange if you dig into it) they have the highest rates of infertile men, too.

      Why do you want to punish an Japanese or German man for overpopulation in Bangladesh?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Because there aren't enough humans by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Typically, the body eliminates immune cells that see itself as a target. Seems it missed one here.

    5. Re:Because there aren't enough humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men are essentially disposable.

      Titanic? Men die in greater numbers.
      War? Men die in greater numbers.
      HIgher education? Men left out in higher numbers.
      Any situation where men are successful? Men can be swapped out for any reason.

      In fact whenever a sacrifice is to be made it is usually men who are forced by society to make it first. And yes, plenty of men will throw other men under a bus for an advantage over other disposable men.

      Have a nice day.

  17. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

    Most of the women I know prefer the old fashioned way too. I'm not worried.

    --
    "Well, time to hit the hay... oh I forgot, I ate it!" - Mr. Ed

  18. If you would have bothered to read the article.. by zawarski · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...you would have seen it's only meant for drinking.

  19. Half-way Point by neoRUR · · Score: 2

    I thought someone by now would have posted a joke about only reaching the half-way point.

    1. Re:Half-way Point by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok, here it goes:

      The North Korean committee to produce butter from shit has reached the halfway point. The taste is still off, but it already spreads pretty well.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this necessary when creimer's mom swallowed millions of my sperm just last night?

  21. "Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Babel-17 · · Score: 1

    All kidding aside, this sounds like an important development. SF authors will have fun with it. Though all along it's been pretty easy for them to just talk about people being constructed from high tech goop/whatever, this will make "Hard SF" more plausible if they need to use constructs of humans as a plot point. An AI with a starship could go into the planet populating business even easier now, and to whatever spec it can program in. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "293 college women were surveyed" doesn't really prove anything...it's scientific-y speculation, not science.

    2. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychology Today has the best SF.

    3. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not SF, either, it's just some guy talking out of his ass.

    4. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning! One of my leg humping trolls hacked my account! Until I get it back don't click on any cdreimer links!
      Slashdot management has been notified!

    5. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lameness Alert!

    6. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why some of the better SF out there is written by women.

    7. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How very dare you!"

      Huh? Is that creimer English?

    8. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you stopped raping your neighbors' goats?

    9. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best way of getting a better word of a man who is the man who is a lord who can make me feel like I should be able at times to be a little bit of the best in my opinion .

    10. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must hurt like hell to be ignored by creimer.

    11. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, creimer is ignoring you. Fucking a goat doesn't change that.

    12. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More. Sel-justified. Bullshit.

    13. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Self justified bullshit"
      Lmao what does that even mean. I'm so happy that FCLM keep up the fight modding you down to nothing every day. You can be assured that if he wasn't here making sure nobody accidentally mod's up your shitposting that others would be doing it for him.

    14. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think every AC is Chris. Therefore you're justified in posting the same bullshit every day. All you're doing is annoying everyone else in the Slashdot community. Meanwhile, Chris is posting on topic comments and is less annoying than you.

    15. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you seriously believe that creimer reads about your imaginary conversations with him?

    16. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Chris, I do. No one else would care, and your malignant ego drives you here.

    17. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Point to a logged-in post asking for your input.
      2) Find a logged-in comment from anyone complaining about me

    18. Re:"Peak Sperm" shortage of the future averted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About mod points, I don't actually mod Chris down, other people do that. But as you can see, myself I need modding up.

      When I have mod points I'll let you know and then you can make an actual high quality post somewhere for me to mod up without getting clobbered by m2

  22. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just that tape of the man himself, bragging about it... Dipshit.

  23. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight guy here. My first experience with a girl, I was a teenager and she grabbed my dick and held a knife to my throat. Not all guys want it. She was an ugly bitch too. #metoo

  24. WHY? Did I miss something? by CFD339 · · Score: 2

    Is there suddenly a world wide shortage of human sperm? This seems the height of waste.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  25. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    youll be surprised how hard the door hits you on your way out when theres a more attractive alternative present

  26. IDIOCRACY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Why are we WASTING a second of time on this non-problem!!

    The only benefit is that maybe we can finally serialize all men at birth! If you want to reproduce, you'll have to intentionally go thru a process... hopefully with some paperwork so the morons are at least delayed.

    So, will we outlaw self-procreation as the most extreme kind of incest? (it's similar to cloning but not enough it should be allowed.)

  27. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if there is some type of shortage?

    1. Re:huh? by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      If we have a nuclear war, there might be.

    2. Re:huh? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      If we have a nuclear war, it's more likely you find a functioning male than a functioning lab.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. We are being replaced guys! by iamacat · · Score: 1

    I knew it, I JUST knew it!

    1. Re:We are being replaced guys! by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      I knew it, I JUST knew it!

      Honestly, I'm all for it. The women who want to get pregnant in this way, go right ahead. No child support that way.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    2. Re:We are being replaced guys! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      they'll steal cells from you, impregnate themselves with derived sperm, and then get your money

  29. Re:WHY? Did I miss something? by shanen · · Score: 1

    Exactly my question, but I'll never see a mod point to give you.

    Looked like a surprisingly active topic, so I stopped by in my usual futile quest for "Funny" or "Insightful" comments. I guess that means I actually square or cube your "WHY?" Not only 'why do this' but 'why were so many people on Slashdot interested enough to comment on it' (without generating any "Funny" or "Insightful" mods (to date)).

    As regards your sig I've heard that Honest Abe is the most frequently used source for bogus quotes. However I wonder if his strong reputation can survive what today's so-called Republicans and their ignominious leader have been doing. Maybe you'll feel obliged to change your sig to say it was Shakespeare?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  30. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by aussie_a · · Score: 0

    So how many people did Trump kill when standing out on the street with a gun? Because he bragged about being able to do that too.

    Face it. Trump has been nothing but lies for a long time. Him saying something is no more proof that he did it than some random whackjob claiming to be the son of God actually being the son of God.

  31. Hey guys - game over! by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 1

    Next: artificial wombs and synthetic eggs impregnated by synthetic sperm. Welcome all ye drones, to our new AI overlords.

    1. Re:Hey guys - game over! by DivineKnight · · Score: 2

      Hush. Let the genders think they have edged out each other for once. It's fun to watch.

  32. Re:WHY? Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no shortage of sperm in this world. Probably easily triple digit gallons of it a day end up in tissues, towels, down the shower drain, etc. It doesn't matter how much you think you're laying your man, he's still taking care of more ejaculations with his hand than ever end up on you, in your snatch, ass or mouth

  33. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    Please, let them. Playing God with the procreation process is usually a civilization destroying process.

  34. Re:If you would have bothered to read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instructions unclear; half of all readers' necks are now broken.

  35. Bukkake machine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese scientists will be following these developments closely ...

  36. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And still we pray to him 2000 years later.

    All you really need is a good PR machine, reality or truth are secondary.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times has that happened in human history? Or are you counting works of fiction?

  38. *usually* a civilization destroying process ? by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Playing God with the procreation process is usually a civilization destroying process.

    What do you mean by "usually" ?
    You have a long list of civilisations all destroyed by the process of "Playing God" with the procreation process ?
    Like a dozen of such cases, to illustrate that indeed that's the most usual out-come ?

    The only instance of "Playing God with the procreation process" is the development of agriculture over the past couple of millennia (hybridizations, selections of weird nearly-impossible offsprings, agricultural crops being so much different from their nearest natural wild relative to be almost unrecognizable, polypoloidy being common in agricultural crops, etc.) and that has in fac turned out quite successful when you look at the evolution of what meal is in your plate.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  39. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Men will destroy the world before they allow sperm to be made in a lab. Nothing is so fragile as the male ego.

    Your ego[1], certainly. Mine is just fine, you can tell by how little self-loathing I exhibit.

    [1] Assuming you identify as a man. Don't want to trigger you, after all.

    Note: Feminism ends a couple of milliseconds after the first nukes hit the ground.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  40. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, let them. Playing God with the procreation process is usually a civilization destroying process.

    Or civilization is weakened, but not destroyed. Just like the illuminati gave free porn so men could be free from chasing arrogant, beautiful women. They now give women free sperm, so they don't need marriage or demanding men to have children. Or they are lesbians and want children. Marriage is definitely doomed in the future.

  41. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So how many people did Trump kill when standing out on the street with a gun? Because he bragged about being able to do that too.

    Just how stupid are you? He didn't say he had killed anyone. He bragged that he could. He said he had grabbed women. Sounds like a confession to me. With a witness. On tape. Would it stand up in court. Would a jury convict? Deity knows there are plenty of people in prison that a jury convicted. Did they all actually commit the crime for which they were convicted.

    And thus the question is answered. You're pretty goddamn stupid if you're arguing that Twitler didn't grab anyone by the pussy.

    Face it. Trump has been nothing but lies for a long time. Him saying something is no more proof that he did it than some random whackjob claiming to be the son of God actually being the son of God.

    Good that you at least admit he's a serial liar. That's a step in the right direction.

  42. Most important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it vegan?

  43. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    So now what are the chicks going to do when there's a spider in the bathtub?

  44. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously haven't met my wife.

  45. Every sperm is sacred... by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    ...every sperm is great!
    When a sperm is created
    God gets quite irate

    --
    We'll make great pets
  46. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he's a liar when he brags about his billions of dollars and other accomplishments you can't stand, but he's fucking Honest Abe to you when he brags about his accomplishments with women, because you're a puritanical cuckold who thinks alpha males steal all the girls from Good Guys like you? OK.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Ummmm.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    I'll make my own thanks. It's a lot more fun.

    1. Re:Ummmm.... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I'll make my own thanks. It's a lot more fun.

      Actually the fun is all in the dispensing. You're making sperm all the time.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  49. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Playing God with the procreation process is usually a civilization destroying process.

    You're kidding, right? Nevermind modern birth control, synthetic hormones, IVF etc, non-procreative sex has been around since before primates waddled around upright. No civilizations destroyed.

  50. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    Even if that were true, can you blame them, after being oppressed for thousands and thousands of years by men? In general, that Y chromosome definitely imparts asshole-ish qualities to its host.

  51. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a similar case years back in Washington, DC where a single mother with nearly as many kids was told her benefits would be capped after she got pregnant again. She sued and the courts ruled she was entitled to per child benefits regardless of how many kids in her litter.

    I've said for many many years, there should be no public assistance without Norplant or some variant. Unless the goal is to provide a human baby factory with free benefits for life, there is no way they will ever be productive if they are always squirting out new welfare checks. You want a check, you get implanted. Don't want it and can't take care of your meal ticket? Baby goes into foster care and you can try to petition your sperm donor for your three hots and a cot.

    Feel free to mod me down, but my paycheck doesn't come free of attached strings. Public assistance is supposed to be help not a lifestyle. Preventing stupid life choices is a big help.

  52. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    Men are in trouble if this succeeds. Feminists are not all welcoming, open, forgiving or tolerant ;) lol

    Good thing that at best, third wave feminists represent about 10% of women. They're quite a minority and the majority of women disagree with them. If you're really that concerned, don't live in one of the far left states. Personally, I'd never live in a locale where third wave feminists and SJW's are elevated in social status. They're just annoying. Three types of people I can't stand: Third Wave Feminists, SJW's and Bible Thumpers. Do your homework on which state to live in and relocate accordingly and live happy.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  53. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    Please, let them. Playing God with the procreation process is usually a civilization destroying process.

    Really now? Can you present evidence for this claim? Do you have evidence for the following:

    1) There has existed a civilization that advanced science to the point that they could artificially reproduce outside of normal biological processes (assuming that they reproduced sexually)
    2) That this scientific advancement destroyed their civilization?

    Take your religious mysticism and FUD and go home.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  54. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    You obviously haven't met my wife.

    When you think with the wrong head, you reap what you sow.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  55. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

    Tolerance of intolerance is fundamentally implied to not being apart of the meaning. So if someone is being an intolerant and sexist jerk, being opposed to that is not generally considered intolerant. For instance, I'm a very tolerant male feminist (as it falls under egalitarian), but I passively or actively oppose inequality, including gender inequality.

  56. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yup because thats Trumps job as he is such a prick.

  57. More Sperm?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't we have enough of this stuff already?? Any other useless thing you want to spend you scientific mind and money on?

  58. What could possibly go wrong? by cmaurand · · Score: 1

    I won't even get into the ethical dilemma.

  59. Re:WHY? Did I miss something? by wilderg · · Score: 0

    You won't really reach the height of waste until someone describes what it tastes like.

  60. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    > Men will destroy the world before they allow sperm to be made in a lab.


    Wrong. It will be produced in a lab. It will be delivered in convenient "to go" boxes.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  61. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    Tolerance of intolerance should not be tolerated. I absolutely am intolerant of intolerant people.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  62. I can think of a less obvious use for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comes in handy for these situations

  63. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even better. How are they going to get that juicy monthly divorce paycheck?

  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. Re: My Great Big Nuclear Button by naubol · · Score: 2

    Most of the women I know prefer the old fashioned way too. I'm not worried.

    youll be surprised how hard the door hits you on your way out when theres a more attractive alternative present

    I think you were responding to the more attractive alternative.

    --
    Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
  66. Just wait for the porn industry to perfect the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    flavor and texture, and there will be a massive increase in the volume of (artificial) bukkake videos.

  67. Great news by Syphonius · · Score: 1

    It's a brave new world we live in! ...

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. Re:WHY? Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there suddenly a world wide shortage of human sperm? This seems the height of waste.

    As a matter of fact, sperm levels have been dropping worldwide.

  71. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That holds no value really. The women alive today were not oppressed for "thousands and thousands of years" by men. They live in a world where they can do anything, and hold privileges that no man gets. If that whole idea of thousands and thousands of years were true then no group ever would be able to live happily because every group has been oppressed, hunted, disparaged or whatever you choose, for thousands of years (or for at least a large percentage of their existence). At what point do you cut off their leeway? This idea of recompense in perpetuity is merely a modern one. Only in modern times does a country pay descendants of people who were wronged 150 to 200 years ago for things that nobody alive was around to be affected by. Only in modern times are people paid lip service for simply being a part of a group that many years ago had a problem. Yes, in modern times there is discrimination still against women. But you know what? There's the same against men too... worse, it is often perpetrated by other men as well! As long as any group is treated as special or different, there will be no true equality. One group will always feel slighted or experience issues from it.

  72. Re:If you would have bothered to read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For that the researches might have to replicate the rest of the ejaculate. Soon, sex toys that come with a filling ports and capsules with flavors and vintages. Some might even have moisturizer in them to shave of few seconds from a busy morning ritual.

  73. There's nothing you can do about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In general, women lack agency - the ability to get places and do things on their own, without someone cheering them on and forcing them to do stuff. Lack of self-confidence is the defining characteristic. So they end up working for or living with men who - guess what - have agency. Women will by and large do demeaning things for people who have this agency. The wish to belong somewhere is strong in most women, overriding pride in many/most cases.

    You can make high profile noise about this (e.g. Weinstein) and you can have lower level sexual harassment/assault claims, but nothing will ever change about this relationship. It's baked in. Women aren't going to get agency as a default and men aren't going stop taking advantage of power to gratify sexual appetites. In fact, i'd expect the pendulum to swing back to a worse time in the next cycle. It always does.

    And before someone whines about their friend who has what I say women don't have... I said most. There are a tiny minority of women who have agency and have self-confidence. Too bad it's so rare.

    1. Re:There's nothing you can do about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The news is filled with stories of women with agency abusing children. It's very discriminatory of you do demean women by saying they don't have agency. Women are as capable as men of having agency.

      If they have less it is a choice or a position independent of their sexual organs. Sexual organs do not mandate our agency and I call you out for a bigot and a demeanor of women.

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Because if theres ONE thing we need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..its more fucking people to pollute and destroy the fucking planet.

    I hope someone shoots these wastes of science as a warning.

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. Scientists trying to steal my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can replicate sperm, then sperm banks won't buy the real stuff for 50 bucks per pop.

  79. Quantum Desert Vagina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares what the identity of any AC's are in a given creimer comment pit. By design nobody except creimer's trolls will ever see them. I feel sorry for any "chicas" in your future as they have to grow up hearing about your antidepressant sperm and other sophomoric nuggets of disgusting sexual wisdom.

    As soon as I read that in our reality my puss went dry in all alternate realities where I have one. You're 10 levels of ick homey.

  80. Great news for Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally won't look so fake in their porn.

  81. Chinese Knockoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there NOTHING you chinese guys won't make a shitty pirate version of? Ms Cleo was Jamaican, dumbass.

  82. Re:WHY? Did I miss something? by swillden · · Score: 1

    Is there suddenly a world wide shortage of human sperm? This seems the height of waste.

    Can you see no value in understanding the process of how sperm is created than to create sperm?

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  83. Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out I've been a scientist since I was 12.

  84. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Even if that were true, can you blame them

    Yes. First, two wrongs don't make a right. Second, sweeping generalisations are always wrong.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  85. Re:WHY? Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and it would probably make more sense to just address that problem than to create artificial sperm. We know roughly why sperm levels are dropping, it's just bad for businesses to remove all those pollutants from our environment.

  86. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Rolgar · · Score: 1

    +10 Ironic!!!!

  87. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's intolerance all the way down.

  88. Re:My Great Big Nuclear Button by edittard · · Score: 1

    They aren't even tolerant of each other. Maybe they could start by agreeing on what the exact definition of a woman is.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  89. What to do?! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    What am I going to do with all this home made sperm?!
    You know it is better than the fake stuff!

    Two scenarios come to mind:
    1) The Matrix uses this technology to farm their own "battteries", and;
    2) SkyNet uses this technology to make the ultimate Terminator.

    Either way, humans are doomed!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.