Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Pulls Out of Deal To Sell China's Huawei Phones In the US (phonedog.com)

According to the Wall Street Journal, AT&T has walked away from a deal to sell China's Huawei smartphones in the U.S. Neither AT&T nor Huawei have commented on the matter, but the news is certainly going to disappoint those of you who were looking forward to picking up Huawei's flagship Mate 10. Prior to this report, Huawei was expected to announce that its flagship Mate 10 will launch on AT&T in 2018. PhoneDog reports: Huawei has a major presence internationally, with recent reports saying that it's the No. 3 smartphone brand in the world behind Apple and Samsung. The company hasn't made much of a dent in the U.S., though, despite the fact that it's been selling its phones unlocked in the U.S. for awhile now. This AT&T deal would've been big for Huawei, helping it to get its phones inside carrier stores and in front of U.S. consumers, the majority of which still buy their phones from their carriers. Now we'll have to wait and see if Huawei can strike a deal with another carrier or if it'll have to continue on in the unlocked market. A Huawei spokesperson only said "Huawei has proven itself by delivering premium devices with integrity globally and in the U.S. market."

63 comments

  1. going out on a limb... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 2

    I'm going to say that there were probably some "just because" terms in the agreement that made it too onerous or unprofitable for ATT to sign off on the deal. Folks accustomed to doing business with some of these Chinese firms that are private (but everyone knows there is a huge government interest) will recognize this for what it is. They wanted very rich terms and aren't accustomed to being told NO.

    1. Re:going out on a limb... by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      AT&T probably couldn't get favorable terms where they wouldn't be stuck with excess inventory of unsellable Huawei phones.

      The poorly received Amazon Fire phone is probably still fresh in their minds. A $199 Fire phone that sold for $0.99 two months later.

    2. Re:going out on a limb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ill go out on another limb and assume ATT pull out because apple pressured them to. It just fits in with apples anti competitive DNA.

  2. Wut? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why on Earth do I need AT&T to sell me a Huawei phone?

    What is so hard about buying an unlocked phone? What is it about buying from a carrier that is preferable - in my experience it's horrible. They are slow and will give you a locked phone when you've paid for an unlocked phone, which you then spend countless hours getting them to fix.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Wut? by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      I guess it's cultural, people in 'Murica are used to buying "subsidized" phones from carriers. It is ultimately far more expensive than paying upfront, but paying in installments makes it less obvious if you're not paying attention.

    2. Re: Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously this.
      I walked into a Best buy and bought an unlocked honor 8 last year, went back to my car, popped in an AT&T sim and had it up and running before I left the parking lot, like 10 minutes after I walked in the door. The carrier phone deals all suck now anyways, just buy unlocked. Faster updates, better resale value

    3. Re:Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I hate to respond to a person with such extreme mental problems that he says "circumcision is child rape," but US carriers moved away from that model years ago.

    4. Re: Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I bought a phone direct from the manufacturer (Not Huawei) a few years ago, it broke and was very difficult to get serviced. Of course it had to be shipped because they had no local presence, it had to be shipped via the one shipping company that has no presence locally, it could not be shipped by a third party shipper that handled some of that shipping company's business in the region because they couldn't scan the carrier specific code, it took several days after having been confirmed as arriving via the package delivery people (Who I spent all day finding a place to ship it from) for the repair facility to acknowledge they got it, they then tried to blame me for their product's defect and demanded $200 to fix it and I refused, then they notified me a few days they had just received it as though the previous discussion had never happened, then they demanded $200 again and I refused, then I spoke with over 10 different people, then they denied me again and I said "Fine, ship it back as-is. I'll never buy another one of your phones again and I will make sure people know how you treat you customers who cut your overhead and buy from you directly" (I had dissuaded 4 people who had previously bought that brand's phones and switched to another brand based on hearing what I was going through at that point). Then they refused to send me back my broken phone (Even though I clearly owned it) and acted incredulous that anyone would refuse their repairs. Weeks passed and they finally sent it back still broken. I then filed a complaint with the Better Business Burearu and we went back and forth on there and they refused to respond coherently to my points and marked it resolved in their favor anyway.

      So, having gone through all this for a month and a half, I bought a phone from another manufacturer through my carrier at a carrier store. Like a week after that, I get an email from the first company saying they'd changed their mind and would send me a replacement phone. So, I sold the new replacement to a relative at half retail value (He knew the story and I warned him it would have no warranty- so he went in eyes open, but did so to get a much better phone than he could normally afford), as I liked my new phone better and was locked into an installment plan in any event.

      The only reason I am not naming the manufacturer that put me through all this is because they did *eventually* ship me a brand new phone. Eventually. I figured that bought them that much. But I would never buy another phone direct from that company again.

      You know what happens when I have a problem with a phone purchased through my carrier? I go to any one of 3 or 4 local stores they have and we work something out. They have an incentive to keep me happy because they make money off me every month through the cell plan as well as a payment plan for the phone when applicable. They treat me poorly and they lose thousands of dollars over however many years when I switch carriers. Also, there is always the whole unhappy customer loudly being unhappy in a store full of prospective buyers- they want to resolve that fast, typically, for obvious reasons.

      Obviously, it depends on the manufacturer, but it is much easier for them to mistreat you if a customer service thing arises when they had no local presence and no monetary relationship with you beyond a one-time purchase that may or may not repeat in a few years. I guess one could mitigate that somewhat by buying through a company with a good reputation for siding with customers like Amazon, but that would primarily be for problems that happen in the first month or something- I would imagine as time goes by, you're eventually just dealing with a manufacter directly again.

      As to why a payment plan versus paying in full: Some people do not have the money to pay for a nice phone all in one go. So, its either they pay with a credit card and then pay interest on the balance until its paid off, or they get what is in essence an interest-free installment loan from the carrier. I would imag

    5. Re:Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Locked phones still exist? I thought they stopped doing that ten years ago.

    6. Re:Wut? by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Indeed, its entirely cultural. Americans apparently want to pay premium prices only for those smartphones that are locked to one carrier, feature the carrier logo on the back cover and on the boot screen (see, we have brand loyalty, to our carrier), and which even in their unlocked state have no support for radio bands to use the device efficiently with any other carrier. We also love having long waiting times for OTA ROM updates, and we like having dozens upon dozens of apps and services that the carrier built into the ROM and which are impossible to uninstall. These phones are just great. So why would I want to walk into Best Buy and buy something like Huawei Mate 9 without any of those carrier "benefits". No wonder Mate 9, while having flagship class hardware does not sell well, even though now normally priced 400-500USD.

    7. Re:Wut? by Dare978Devil · · Score: 1

      You don't, but 90% of phones sold are sold by an ISP as part of a subsidized contract-based deal. Hey, pay 900 dollars for that phone at Best Buy with no contract, or get it from us for only 360 (with a 3 year contract)!

    8. Re:Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We really don't. This is something forced on us. There is a reason why people pay the price premium for an iPhone, and that is because there is no carrier crapware, the device can be moved between networks, you have updates for years, and premium security (iOS has never had a rogue malware app in the wild, which is pretty good.)

    9. Re:Wut? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      How about: it's a package of child rape, torture, mayhem, endangerment, organ theft, and medical fraud.

    10. Re:Wut? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Evidently not. I was presented with a locked phone purchased brand new from an AT&T store as an unlocked phone 3 years ago.
      The hapless user (who travels) found the phone wouldn't work with alternative carrier SIM.

      Getting AT&T to unlock it was a major undertaking. This is one of many reasons to hate AT&T.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  3. Win! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Another win for consumer choice! Thanks capitalism!

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  4. Not MediaTek? by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

    I can't immediately tell, but these Phones seem to have some variant that looks really similar to the MediaTek chips that BLU sells, only they seem to be called the Kirin. (Its like they made extremely high Quality MediaTek CPUs and Mali GPUs. Can anyone speak to the quality and build of these devices? AT&T Has a history of wanting Custom locked down builds of Android Roms on Phones they sell, loaded up with garbage. I'm sure the idea of selling some MediaTek relative with ADUPS is a non-starter for any US Carrier.

    1. Re:Not MediaTek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kirin is made by Hisilicon, Huawei's subsidiary which designs ARM chips, and it has nothing to do with MediaTek from Taiwan.

    2. Re:Not MediaTek? by guacamole · · Score: 1

      The HiSicon Kirin SoCs are basically flagship level. They pretty much match the top Qualcomm SoCs in terms of CPU performance, but lose a bit in terms of GPU (who cares anyways?). As for Huawei Mate series, these are pretty much flagship level smartphones. The year old Mate 9 is a great phone even today, and the greatest thing is that it was not attached to any carrier (I avoid carried branded phones like a plague).

      https://www.anandtech.com/show...

  5. Intriguging by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

    Earlier in the day I saw an a US ad for Huawei. It was the first time I've ever seen such a thing. It was also very strange. I am going to walk out on a limb and sound racist. Slashdot can make of it what it will. It was a very American ad in terms of dramatizing how super cool their tech is and the general way it was scripted and shot. It was also presented as a "here we come" kind of commercial. It was also very Asian as all the actors had were Chinese (or looked kinda like it) had heavy Asian accents, and was obviously shot in China, yet they were acting like Americans. It was about the Mate 10 being the end all be all. I think perhaps I saw it on YouTube which is strange as I only saw it the one time. I wish I had a link. Did anyone else see it?

    Dissect this as you wish. I could have given a better commentary but I've been drinking. It was rather striking and unusual though.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Intriguging by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

      Want to see something just as weird? Go to China and watch American commercials for Chinese stuff. They have American's with American accents. Some were obviously shot in America.

      --
      Doh' - H. Simpson

    2. Re:Intriguging by jrumney · · Score: 1

      yet they were acting like Americans.

      Or maybe they're just acting like human beings, and your perception of how foreigners should act is being shattered.

    3. Re:Intriguging by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you don't think Americans have a distinctive personality? Especially in advertisements? They sure do. Chinese have a distinct personality, too, especially in Chinese-made advertisements.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Intriguging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't act like human beings.

    5. Re:Intriguging by dj245 · · Score: 2

      Earlier in the day I saw an a US ad for Huawei. It was the first time I've ever seen such a thing. It was also very strange. I am going to walk out on a limb and sound racist. Slashdot can make of it what it will. It was a very American ad in terms of dramatizing how super cool their tech is and the general way it was scripted and shot. It was also presented as a "here we come" kind of commercial. It was also very Asian as all the actors had were Chinese (or looked kinda like it) had heavy Asian accents, and was obviously shot in China, yet they were acting like Americans. It was about the Mate 10 being the end all be all. I think perhaps I saw it on YouTube which is strange as I only saw it the one time. I wish I had a link. Did anyone else see it? Dissect this as you wish. I could have given a better commentary but I've been drinking. It was rather striking and unusual though.

      Foreign companies sometimes have to walk a fine line that can be difficult to follow. Many American chains in Japan have failed. Some didn't offer enough "Japanized" menu options (Wendy's). Others went in the other direction and failed because they catered 100% to Japanese tastes, and didn't offer any American menu items for customers who were seeking American-style food (Krispy Kreme).

      Marketing and branding are also very important. The foreign company has to find some niche or market that domestic companies fail to deliver on. As example, KFC has somehow convinced many Japanese people that Christmas = Fried Chicken. This was probably helped by the fact that Christmas in Japan is not the huge tradition it is in the USA, and turkey is very uncommon in Japan. KFC manufactured a tradition where none existed.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  6. However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA... by Nova+Express · · Score: 1

    ...I trust the Chinese government even less, and will avoid entrusting my data to a Chinese-made phone.

    (Yes, I know a lot of lower-level chips used in phones are fabbed in China. I trust Apple more to detect embedded spyware than I do Chinese manufacturers not to put it there...)

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  7. Not disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is plenty of other Chinese junk on the market if you want something that's going to be buggy af.

  8. Never again! by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm on replacement Nexus 6P #2 due to fucking batteries that lose 60% of their capacity within a few months. Google & Huawei blame each other, I get stuck eating $79 deductibles each time to exchange it, and the replacement phone's battery is ultimately shit, too... new, but ultimately as flawed as the last.

    It'll be a very, very long time before I buy another Huawei phone... if ever.

    1. Re:Never again! by iamr00t · · Score: 1

      +1
      "delivering premium devices with integrity" - thousands of customers would disagree...

      https://issuetracker.google.co...

    2. Re:Never again! by guacamole · · Score: 1

      To be honest, nearly every 2015 Android smartphone was garbage thanks to those Snapdragon 808/810 SoCs which were using those garbage A57 cores. Anandtech did a test that showed that most of 2015 phones throttled their "fast" A57 cores within seconds, and then switched to the efficient but slow A54 cores. You experience with Nexus 6P may have been bad, but I can guarantee that the experience of LG Nexus 5X users was a lot worse (draconian CPU throttling, poor multitasking, and destined to eventually bootloop).

    3. Re:Never again! by Shompol · · Score: 1

      I used Huawei Honor Note 8 for a year and the quality is awesome, especially the battery. Both capacity of 4500 mAh and power management is outstanding. I am never going back to Samsung with self-combusting 3000 mAh.

  9. AT&T did good? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Deathstar Co has been on my "Do not do business with" list for a long time (90's?). This is the first time I've seen them do something right. China is pure evil. There are some really cool people there, making some really inexpensive electronics -- Anker, LED Lights (too many manufacturers to list), etc. -- however, I would not trust any "smart" device that comes from a county that supports N. Korea, thwarts (actively ignores) legitimate patents and generally supports Communist Dictatorships.

    Just my $0.02. YMMV, IANAL, YCFOIYANO (That last one might be new... You can fuck off if you are now offended)

  10. Re:However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

    I agree. After all the software I've seen, I'd have to think that there was some piece of software that was reporting back to Huawei that they wouldn't or couldn't have gotten rid of.

    --
    Ditto - Patrick Swayze

  11. Bullshit. You are talking out your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You have no idea what you are talking about. You flat out made that up. Chinese firms make it very easy to go into business together. Very easy. Very very easy. Their negotiations go like this: "Yes. Yes. We can do that. Yes. Yes. Yes."

    That's why China has done so well in attracting business and outperforming India and Africa who can offer cheaper labor. Chinese companies keep as much distance from the ruling communist party as they legally can. Most of them are in southern china far from the seat of power. You think they've going to invite communists into their factories for advice on running the place? Fuck no. Read "Poorly made in China". You are welcome you brainwashed imperialist capitalist pig. :-)

    1. Re:Bullshit. You are talking out your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chinese companies keep as much distance from the ruling communist party as they legally can."
      Chinese companies pay on average a 40% tax to the government for every medium to large sized companies. And this doesn't even count the bribes to government officials with a vested interest in the company. They also have a fulltime government "minder" on the staff. Every media outlet in China have government censors on staff with the power to decide what gets published. And all of the economic statistics published about China are hard if not impossible for an outsider to verify and any Chinese citizen who attempts to contradict the state are harshly dealt with. And China is not a communist state. How does a communist state produce some of the richest people on the planet? There has never been a successful communist state. Communism is just a cover story used by the dictators and sociopaths to justify their actions. They are cut throat capitalists with the "Party" playing the China Inc. board of directors. China is the most successful regime change operation the US has ever attempted. Trade is good and ushering China into the international trading and financial systems. All the US had to do was show the individuals in power how wealthy they would be becoming a supplier and a consumer of international trade products. And there is no reason for the level of animosity between both countries. Hell China is probably the only country on the planet that the US has not invaded. China is just a economic competitor which is a natural state of affairs. The Chinese military doesn't come close to matching the power of the US military. And just like Russia they do not have the means to deploy any significant military assets any where in the world. China has been hesitant to applying pressure NK over their nuclear program because they do not want to look powerless when NK tell them to pound stand.

    2. Re:Bullshit. You are talking out your ass by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      China is achieving socialism by the capitalist road. No wonder people are shouting "that's not real socialism", that's what they always do. Socialism has to win the prize for most distant, unachievable goal right next to me getting to bang a Hollywood starlet. Well, unless I was in charge of a production company.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Bullshit. You are talking out your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is largely on the money tho: "Hell China is probably the only country on the planet that the US has not invaded" During the colonial era America invaded China with the other colonial powers - funny what they forget to tell you in history class - and China still smarts over it: https://www.quora.com/Has-the-US-ever-invaded-China

      "Chinese companies pay on average a 40% tax to the government for every medium to large sized companies." Of what is on their books ;-)

      "They also have a fulltime government "minder" on the staff." For certain not the case at the smaller factories.

      " The Chinese military doesn't come close to matching the power of the US military." I think you are right but military history is full of upset victories.

      "And just like Russia they do not have the means to deploy any significant military assets any where in the world." They don't need to. It's cheaper to buy influence than force it down the barrel of a gun.

      "And China is not a communist state. How does a communist state produce some of the richest people on the planet?" The US is more communist than China is these days

    4. Re:Bullshit. You are talking out your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that any foreign ventures on their soil have to be 51% owned by Chinese interests.

      They play the game well, and have evolved from a struggling military power fresh from a purge of intellectuals to arguably the strongest economy worldwide by some metrics.

      What scares me is when they decide that they don't need to pay ball anymore and start using their military might. In 24 hours, Korea would be a crater by conventional artillery, Taiwan overrun, Japan EMP-ed or otherwise nuked, and other nations, like Australia, Signapore and other PacRim neighbors be brought to heel. This is trivial, and the US could do nothing to stop it.

  12. Re:However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA......I trust the Chinese government even less, and will avoid entrusting my data to a Chinese-made phone.

    I'd rather have the Chinese spying on me than my own government. The former's ability to fuck with your life is much more limited.

  13. Re:However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

    >I trust the Chinese government even less, and will avoid entrusting my data to a Chinese-made phone.

    1) As a Canadian, I'm less likely to have trouble from the Chinese looking at my phone contents than the Americans (who share with Canada).

    2) The phone I bought has been dissected by non-Chinese hackers who found nothing unusual or scary on it.

    3) Unfortunately, countering point 1, it is an Android phone so in reality Google probably owns it. :(

    4) I got a great (in my opinion) phone for a lot less than I'd pay if I'd bought a similarly-featured domestically available phone.

  14. Re:AT&T did good? WTF? by lucm · · Score: 1

    thwarts (actively ignores) legitimate patents

    One thing that can be confusing about China is that people over there tend to value pragmatism and do not see contracts as a thing that should shackle someone in a business partnership if it's no longer profitable. This may sound horrible to some westerners who see contracts (or patents) as set in stone, but that's just a cultural thing, it's not "evil". And it's not one-way either.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  15. Spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of choices between phones that run spyware android OS, and phones that run spyware androidOS+backdoor China firmware/hardware, and phones with call-home Siri.

    Then again, why would anyone want to carry with them an always-on GPS device.

  16. Re:However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    How did that "trust" the consumer had work out over the years and years of PRISM?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    That was US and UK backed collect it all on networks and OS. The product line was the collection method.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. Re:However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    China has a few limited areas of direct internet interest.
    People using a VPN the Communist party in China has not been given a backdoor to in China.
    If the VPN works well all over China, some deal to report users is in place.
    CIA, MI6 funded and supported protesters in China.
    Wealthy people who have escaped China and who are now supporting protesters in China.
    The creation of new network to try and support protesters in China.
    To probe dual use mil/gov/comsumer telco networks that collect to on mil. air force, navy, army, special forces bases globally.
    Was a nation foolish and trusted another nations consumer telco products expect them to probe your secret mil infrastructure thats on the wide open "internet".
    Connect your most sensitive sites to the open "web" and other nations will take a look.
    The rest of the spying is done by humans loyal to the Communist party all over the world in academia, business, civil society. No internet is risked as the FBI, MI5, GCHA, NSA can discover entire spy networks who chat too much on the "net"

    vs. the NSA and GCHQ 5 hops of global collect it all efforts.
    The West collects it all online. Other nations use their own trusted humans to spy globally for generations. The West has Prism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    China has human spies. From the average US consumer, the junk NSA encryption sold in tame US OS, hardware, software is a real problem.
    That has reduced the protection of working encryption and replaced it with backdoors, trapdoors, no encryption.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. Xiaomi ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm the one i have heard about being "groundbreaking " is Xiaomi

  19. Huawei U8150 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Removable battery (still not replaced) had it since 2009 or 2010, and it is still in use 7-8 years later, despite constant dropping, spilling alcohol on it (which dissolved some of the capacitive gel under the protective cover) and regular use that entire time.

    It's been upgraded once unofficially to Android 4, but otherwise has had no modding, gets used strictly as a phone, and only has f-droid supplied apps installed on it.

    Not necessarily secure, but the operating system itself doesn't appear to be leaking anything so the only backdoors are in the baseband firmware, or clicking links/installing software that could backdoor it. But thanks to firewalling even that is pretty unlikely.

    As far as blaming the batteries: That is mostly the attempts to make them less than a 1/4" thick, 1/4-1/2" thick batteries tend to be pretty reliable unless you drop, puncture, or overheat them, but anything thinner just doesn't have the room for a proper shell around it to protect the cells.

    1. Re:Huawei U8150 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily secure, but the operating system itself doesn't appear to be leaking anything so the only backdoors are in the baseband firmware, or clicking links/installing software that could backdoor it.

      Better keep the WiFi and Bluetooth turned off on that baby.

    2. Re:Huawei U8150 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandpa and his rotary phone doesn't have problems with batteries either.

  20. Have to play to the stereotype by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Damn, there's goes most of Slashdot's best chance to ever get a Mate.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  21. US government pressure? by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Could the US government have pressured AT&T to drop the deal with Huawei on spying concerns same as they did in regards to Huawei cellular networking backend gear?

    1. Re:US government pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might be scared Huawei would build something into their hardware like Intel did with their CPUs: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/hardware/intels-secret-cpu-on-chip-management-engine-me-runs-on-minix-os/

    2. Re:US government pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand the current corporate-government dynamic. The US no longer pressures business... business now pressures the US. Look at the FCC crap.

  22. Re: AT&T did good? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The notion that you would dishonor a contract (relationship) whenever it was convenient seems pretty evil to me and a moral failing that transcends culture.

  23. Re: However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Avast inside the "Optimiser" apps came preinstalled with most Chinese phones. The default keyboard constantly connecting to the some servers. Doesn't sound very good does it? Well those are just some of the oddities I observed in our home network with the few Chinese phones we have. On top of that is the usual Android crap

  24. Re: AT&T did good? WTF? by lucm · · Score: 1

    then you don't understand evil and you don't understand cultural differences.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  25. 50 is limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Communist Party requires a representative in every company with more than 50 employees. https://hbr.org/2014/03/why-china-cant-innovate

  26. Re:However little I trust Apple, AT&T, and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. If we have this or any other brand of phone for sale where the NSA doesn't have direct control over the manufacturer, well, that's just a bad thing for too many people who are into illegal spying. I'm sure somebody had words with AT&T about that.

  27. Re: AT&T did good? WTF? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    you don't understand evil

    So sayeth the cultural relativist.

    There are several cultures known for lying casually; it varies from the passive-aggressive "polite" way Nihonjin do it to the fear-based way Okies do it (one of the few ways in which they tend to be rather Texans) to the practical way Somalis do it (you generally can't trust a word out of their mouths). Is it cultural? Sure. Is that an excuse?? Fuck, no... and fuck cultural relativity.

  28. Re: AT&T did good? WTF? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    That should have read "...unlike Texans."

  29. Re:AT&T did good? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: "quality fade."

    When it is in their favor, they will honor a contract. When not... well... they don't. Simple as that.

    Americans may be asses, but they honor their part of the deal, even when the Chinese use their IP for "third shift" products.

  30. Re: AT&T did good? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Texas, being called a liar used to be fighting words. Now, with how morals have changed, the person that swallowed someone's BS is considered the dumb one, not the one whose morals are lacking.

    This only will come back to haunt us. You may see fear based lying from Okies, but there is a reason why people from other areas just avoid them, and already, we are seeing this with Americans in general.

    Maybe there might be a a tipping point, where someone's word may mean something again. Who knows.

  31. had one - went dead just after warranty expired by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

    As in the subject. It is true that the sample is too small to be valid, however it has never happened before with any phone I owned. Usually they far outlive they usefulness. In case of this brand however, just about a month or two after its warranty expired the phone went dead, no warnings, no errors, did not fall, was taken good care of, yet still just gone, and it was a top of the line Nexus 6P. The previous one Samsung S4 (no affiliation with the company whatsoever) fell on the concrete, corner first, screen cover cracked (just in the corner, which hit the ground) - still working.

    So, no thank you.

  32. A while or awhile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-while-vs-awhile/