Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Is There a Useful Voice-Activated PC? (dailycaring.com)

An anonymous reader writes: My elderly monther-in-law misses her computer. Her mind is okay, but she cannot use a computer because of her Parkinson's disease.

I am not all that impressed with Amazon Echo. Seems you can ask the Echo for the time of day, or the weather outside, but it will not do anything useful -- like send an email. A voice controlled PC would be great, even if it only did a few simple tasks.

The original submission ends with a question: "Is there such a thing?" So leave your best thoughts and suggestions in the comments. Is there a useful voice-activated PC?

56 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by damnbunni · · Score: 4, Informative

    Windows since XP and MacOS since like... 9.0 have included voice assistive technologies.

    You just have to turn them on.

    If the OS's built in speech recognition and control don't do what you want, buy a copy of Dragon NaturallySpeaking.

    1. Re:Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      Indeed. As a proof of concept, about ten years ago I hooked up a pair of VHF radios to my computer's sound card and used the built in voice rec in Windows to set up a bunch of commands. Music, video, etc. I had at one time envisioned coming home.and putting on a little wireless mic (stage production kind of thing) and being able to control things. The proof of concept was a resounding success - I was able to train it to understand me perfectly. In the end I just found it less useful than doing things myself.

      This is one of the reasons why I won't use the current tech. There is zero reason why it has to call home every time I use it to send my voice to their servers for interpretation. If I was, ten years ago, able to have it recognize my voice perfectly well (with surprisingly little training) through the poor audio of a cheap radio, then there is even less reason why it's required today. Setting this precedent is dangerous. I'll be willing to bet the first androids we get will be centrally controlled. Why make their processing self contained when they can use the excuse that they need the processing power only available in their servers to control them.

    2. Re:Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by Master+Moose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll be willing to bet the first androids we get will be centrally controlled. Why make their processing self contained when they can use the excuse that they need the processing power only available in their servers to control them.

      I'll be willing to bet that very soon most "personal" computing will be centrally controlled with very little processing happening on a users device and most of it being pumped from the vendors servers.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    3. Re:Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by scdeimos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is people in general are lazy and do not want to spend the time needed to train the system for each person so we need the raw power of powerful servers to do general voice processing.

      We actually don't, you know.

      Anyone using Siri can tell you that the local phone screen already displays the text of your query while it's going off to ask Apple's servers what to do, and still displays it when it comes back with "Oops, we seem to be having communication problems. Please try again later."

      In other words the speech-to-text conversion has already happened on the phone. Apple's servers are just applying Natural Language Processing techniques on the text to figure out what the request means. This is also something that could happen on the phone, Apple just wants a view into everyone's lives.

    4. Re:Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I'll be willing to bet that very soon most "personal" computing will be centrally controlled with very little processing happening on a users device and most of it being pumped from the vendors servers.

      Not bloody likely.

      It's been tried -- several times -- and except in specific corporate use-cases is just not very feasible.

      Over the years, as networking and local compute power have vied for "usefulness", different combinations of local computing versus "thin clients" have been tried. None really caught on except in narrow niches.

      Ultimately, people do not -- and should not -- want to be tied to some third party to do what can be done in their own home. Most people aren't that stupid.

    5. Re:Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Clarification:

      "None really caught on except in narrow niches." should have been "None of the thin client solutions really caught on..."

    6. Re:Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by dkman · · Score: 1

      Most people aren't that stupid.

      Citation please?

      I was with you until that last statement.

      --
      I refuse to sign
    7. Re:Any PC or Mac with a microphone. by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, people do not -- and should not -- want to be tied to some third party to do what can be done in their own home.

      Yes, agree that we should not want this. However, in the current app driven, always connected "Cloud' world, I am not convinced that many of the big tech companies would not be angling or this as much as possible.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
  2. iPad, Siri and accessibility features by k2r · · Score: 4, Informative

    An iPad with proper accessibility settings and Siri voice recognition.
    Iâ(TM)m not a native speaker and Siri does understand me well enough to write proper emails and messages.

    https://www.abilitynet.org.uk/...

    1. Re:iPad, Siri and accessibility features by Brulath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My dad is in aged care with fairly advanced Parkinson's disease and finds Siri to be entirely unusable due to the tremor in his voice (a common symptom). He uses an iPad to check emails and facebook, send messages, and call people on Skype. I've tried turning Siri off, as he tends to hold the home button long enough to activate it frequently, but pressing the home button just asks you to turn Siri on again (which is not helpful at all). I recently activated the accessibility settings which require him to press longer to "tap" and ignore secondary taps (from shaking hands), which appears to have helped.

      She may be able to use her computer with some modifications to the peripherals. There are large keyboards, like this one, which have a perspex shield above them to rest your hands on. To press a key you have to put your finger through the holes in the thick plastic cover, which prevents a shaking arm from accidentally pressing the wrong keys. A trackball mouse is another improvement, as it doesn't require the arm to move precisely and, at least in my dad's case, the fingers are a bit more stable. I was planning to get both for dad, but he doesn't currently have space for them.

      Either way, I'd recommend trying to see if Siri or similar can actually understand her consistently before investing in voice technology. You can get a fair way with disability-accessible computer peripherals instead.

  3. Maybe Cortana? by sanf780 · · Score: 1

    I know you need to give access to millions of sensitive data in order to use Cortana (Windows 10). I have not had much success on either Cortana ir OK Google as I am not an English speaker. I know other people had success with Siri.

  4. How angry does she get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because no voice activated PC ever didn't make the user angry by doing the wrong f--king thing at the wrong time. On top of this you're probably going to force windows on her as well.

    At least she'll get a good workout throwing the f.?king thing out of the window when it really gets on her nerves.

  5. Windows has speech options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And I've used them successfully, too. To control the PC and to write documents.

  6. Sure by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    They are called iPads.

  7. Tremor Cancellation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not a direct answer, but perhaps helpful -- there is some promising work being done with tremor compensation/cancellation technology. Strap on a bracelet with a type of vibrator attached and it can stabilize your hand movements, kind of like camera stabilization does for taking pictures.

    https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/projects-backed-by-google-and-microsoft-are-tackling-parkinsons-disease/

    1. Re:Tremor Cancellation by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1

      Same thing, different article. Not available yet, I believe...

      https://blogs.microsoft.com/tr...

      This is a lovely idea. I wonder whether we could also come up with a digital filter that could take out Parkinson's tremors when using an ordinary mouse. I want to work on it.

  8. Dragon NaturallySpeaking by taxman_10m · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think that does what you are looking for.

    1. Re:Dragon NaturallySpeaking by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to sit next to someone who had RSI so used to Dragon Dictate (as it was then) to do a lot of his keyboard work, which included writing code. On bad dates he could use it to control the mouse too. This is not easy, so it depends on how determined your mother-in-law is. If she has computer skills but has just lost the manual control, then a Dragon product may do the job. If she hasn't handled a computer in some time, so she will be getting used to a new computer, a new OS, and everything else being in the wrong place as well as this new tool, all at once; then it is a big ask.

    2. Re:Dragon NaturallySpeaking by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately, This would not be the case. Too much physical interaction is still required for it to be "Truly" useful... Being in IT for 28+ years now, I have several customers who are paraplegic for one reason or another. Some have use of their hands, some only minimally. (Cerebral Palsy) My customers who have minimal use of their hands typically type with a special mouse using the on-screen keyboard. As Dragon makes too many mistakes, has too many bugs, and just can't fit the bill consistently enough to meet their needs. Dragon does do some neat things, but as far as every disabled person I have spoken to, they would say it doesn't work well enough to say it "Does what you are looking for" (No trolling or offense intended, just my2. Peace)

    3. Re:Dragon NaturallySpeaking by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

      EDIT: to clarify, they use the On-Screen keyboard in "conjunction" with something like Dragon, Siri, Google, Alexa, Etc.

    4. Re:Dragon NaturallySpeaking by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      open thunderird
      write now email
      ---dictate to address
      ---dictate message
      send email

      works fine for me

      That "works fine for me" is the problem. What works for one person won't work for another. You're technically savvy, with a mind working well enough to remember those specific commands. Those who would benefit the most from such a system might not be.

      Some won't remember the exact statements, or their order.
      Some won't have a clear enough voice, or one that works in the specific frequency and amplitude range the machine needs[*].
      Some can't put on a headset properly.
      Some can't see the screen well enough to know whether the computer understood.
      Some won't have the patience to go through so many steps.
      Some will say other things in-between which throws the voice recognition off.

      All those "somes" add up, and it won't work for a large portion of those who would be the most helped if it worked.

      [*]: I give up on most voice controlled phone and car systems. My voice is very deep and very soft, and what little makes it past the high-pass filter is frequently misunderstood. It gets really frustrating when the systems have an option to say "human" to speak to a human, but the systems can't even understand that you say "human". Especially if it then tries to throw up a simplified yes/no guessing game, but can't even understand when you say "yes" or "no".

      In short, expert systems in general and voice recognition in particular is today a "works for most" that creates an even bigger divide between conformant majorities and minorities that actually need more help.

  9. Best suggest would be to work with Blind organizat by oxnyx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having spent a certain amount of time with disability offices I suggest that you go and find a local Blind Association and see if they can allow her to test out some of the software written for blind people. Jaws is a software that allows you too hear in one ear what's on the screen and what you're typing in the other ear might be more difficult than your mother-in-law can manage. The other thing is that this will probably help her get access two other entertainments such as audio books and people in a similar condition to commiserate. What you're looking for is probably not an out-of-the-box solution sold at the General Market but something you're going to find it's a little more expensive but there's probably a grant for it.

    --
    Life is like untied shoe laces; it always tripping you up and getting in your way.
  10. I would suggest a disability support group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Obviously setting up these devices can take some customization, and bringing up the Amazon Echo, a device not meant to be a computer, while appearing ignorant of the existing voice-assistance technologies in actual computer OSes is a warning sign that you may need real hands-on help.

    Not that we won't try here, but I've got to get that advice out of the way.

  11. It has to work OFFLINE to make sense. by xxxLCxxx · · Score: 1

    The answer is simple: The technology has to BE ON YOUR COMPUTER. It has to work offline as well. Otherwise this is just the usual "giving away your most private information for free".

    1. Re:It has to work OFFLINE to make sense. by Mascot · · Score: 2

      How is "it has to work offline" an answer to the question of whether there are functional solutions for voice controlling things like sending emails and other basic PC usage scenarios?

      I don't know the elderly woman in question, but my bet would be that she cares _a lot_ more about whether or not she can make the solution do what she needs, than whether or not it is offline or online. Either way, that's her call.

    2. Re:It has to work OFFLINE to make sense. by davidwr · · Score: 1

      How is "it has to work offline" an answer to the question of whether there are functional solutions for voice controlling things like sending emails and other basic PC usage scenarios?

      1) You cannot depend on being online 24/7.

      2) Some people reasonably consider "online only" to be such an invasion of privacy that it's fundamentally broken. That is, by definition, it "does not work" even if it appears to work. Granted, that's a philosophical rather than a technical argument, but it is an argument nonetheless.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    3. Re:It has to work OFFLINE to make sense. by Mascot · · Score: 1

      My point was that it did not answer the question. We know nothing of the woman's connectivity, or whether she cares about privacy issues. The "answer" offered no actual suggestions for solutions, just some related personal opinions phrased as absolutes.

    4. Re: It has to work OFFLINE to make sense. by xxxLCxxx · · Score: 1

      "simply to Superior" indeed. Good work Google.

  12. Of course by quonset · · Score: 1

    It comes from the same people who make automated lawn mowers.

    They're called children.

  13. Would need to use command words more accurately. by deviated_prevert · · Score: 2
    The problem with voice activated commands to effectively use web sites like facebook, is that there is no web specific way of selecting functions on standard web page even with HTML5. However I am sure that they are working on it at facebook. If they do release a facebook specific browser with a function audio command structure for a front end that remains static then it may become entirely possible to surf the site. Google chrome does surf by audio and is operating system agnostic unlike Siri which is apples pie in the sky attempt at market dominance or Cortana which is Microsoft's answer to Google chrome and Siri.

    The overwhelming problem with all of these speech recognition interfaces is that web sites are not coded for key word searches and every website on the planet would most likely screw up the idea of using a keyword search structure. Again it all comes down to language and the fact that the complexity involved in obtaining fine grained results from key words in combinations interpolated by a computer is an enormous task that is fraught with the possibility of error.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  14. Dragon by Humbubba · · Score: 1

    Nuance's Dragon NaturallySpeaking is advertised as such an accessibility solution. IMO, a programmer might be helpful in case a little coding and registry manipulation is needed.

  15. Had the same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem with an aging parent with RA that was so bad she could not type. I asked her what she wanted the computer to do for her. She gave me a list of 7-8 things (search the web, write an email, open her facebook page and weather were the top ones) so I downloaded https://mega-voice-command.com/ and went to work. It took about an hour to set it up and get it to respond to her the way she wanted. That was 8 months ago and now we have about 80 custom commands in it and I just put another mic in her living area so she doesn't have to get up to use it. It even works if the 'net is down because it is a local DB and not an online one like Alexa and it takes up little room, unlike Dragon.

    I get a LOT of emails and facebook posts from gams now!

  16. Switch Control, or similar by gkearney · · Score: 1

    On the MacOS, iOS and tvOS, all from Apple, there is an accessibility service called Switch Control. Similar software exists for other operating systems. Switch Control along with the built in dictation service provides a means for those with very limited mobility to operate a computer or similar device.

    When connected to a bluetooth switch such as those made by Ablenet (www.ablenetinc.com) the whole interface can be control from a single button which can be bushed by the disabled person. Other switches work by means of puffing into a tube or tracking head movements. People with very limited movement are able to employ this to use computers and there are a number of videos of such use on YouTube. Dictation, now built into Windows and MacOS, iOS, tvOS and Android could be used to provide easy text entry. Combining these and the voice control functions of modern operating system should provide her with the tools needed to again access her computer.

  17. Get back to what is needed by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    X10 (industry standard) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    With a home computer, the home automation kit and no internet many tasks can be automated using voice.
    Generations of people in the USA used their DOS and Windows voice control to automate their lights, thermostats, alarms, some appliances.
    Such systems did the task asked for when told. No need for a robot buddy or todays ad and internet connected systems.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. The emperor has no clothes by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    The big tech companies are pushing the digital assistant technology hard, but the truth is that, as things currently stand, the usefulness of such assistants is extremely limited. They are able to answer very specific, domain-limited questions which, for the most part, you could answer yourself probably just as quickly, if not more so, from your keyboard. Other than that, they do very little that is really useful. My Alexa device can turn lights on and off - which I can do faster by throwing a switch. I guess it is useful when you want to do it remotely. OK. As for the weather, both Alexa and Google (whatever it is called today) tell you the weather forecast all right - but their understanding is nonexistent. Tell them explicitly NOT to give you the weather forecast, and they will give you the weather forecast. Or say some nonsense that includes the word "weather", and they will give you the weather forecast. Try to get them to do something slightly complicated or ambiguous, the kind of thing that a child would accomplish without any problems, and they will consistently fail. Are they useful? In very, very limited ways. Are they worth the while? For grins and giggles, yes. For just about anything serious, what you would expect from a human assistant, no. Maybe in 10 years time. However, bearing in mind the track record of the AI community, whereby they have consistently gotten carried away in their projections, I remain skeptical.

  19. Not to shill for Apple, but... by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    Mac OS X has had this feature for nearly 20 years.

  20. No by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    No

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  21. Several are useful. by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 1

    Several are useful (saving time or complexity), but mostly in very limited spaces. Google's is useful when you don't want or have the free hands for typing a query into your phone. Echo is useful for playing background music. Even Kinect's can be useful for commands on a TV. If you want a fully functioning assistant, hire one; AI isn't there yet.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
    1. Re:Several are useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are still issues with voice recognition unless you train it, all too often.

      "Google, I'd like to order some hot meals"

      "Did you mean 'My Hovercraft is full of eels'"?

    2. Re:Several are useful. by VanessaE · · Score: 2

      Benny: Please disable the shield systems.
      Computer: Of course. There are no movies in your area with that title.

      [... a few minutes and many comparable misunderstandings later ...]

      Benny: Disable the shield! Come on! You are undermining me!
      Computer: Which phrase would you like me to underline?
      Benny: Disable the shield!
      Metal Beard: Let me try.
      Metal Beard: Be ye disabling of yond shield.
      Computer: Disabling shield.
      Benny: What?!

    3. Re:Several are useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Siri is the worst...

      "Hey Siri, play music by The Corrs."

      "Coming right up, Rock The Casbah by The Clash."

      Sounds like it's doing you a favour.

  22. Dragon/dragonfly by arnott · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can train your PC to do that. I use dragon naturally speaking with dragonfly python scripting. There are many python libraries which are built on dragonfly, which do the job.

    Caster is a good one. Check these tutorials.

    You will need to spend some time to understand how things work and train your mother-in-law to use the customized voice commands.

    Search for "dragon naturally speaking demo" on YouTube to see what others do.

  23. Yes. Try Nuance products (e.g. Dragon, etc.) by aussersterne · · Score: 2

    I have a friend who is a quadriplegic and lives in an electric chair. He is also a software engineer and very active on Facebook. Last time I knew the details of his setup he was using Dragon, I believe. As I understand it, it's fully customizable, i.e. you get to tie particular voice commands that you choose to particular actions, widgets, keystrokes, etc.

    It took him a year or three to get it all customized to his liking for everything, but at this point he basically rolls around and uses the laptop attached to the deck on his chair in front of him nonstop. He's got a bunch of IoT/smart home stuff set up at home and in his office as well, he provided directions and his wife set it all up under his supervision.

    The result is that he basically has a workable voice interface to the Internet, his IDE, Windows, and also most of his immediate physical surroundings, so that he lives a fairly normal life, apart from bodily functions and eating, which he obviously needs help with. But most everything else, from rolling around/chair control to lights and blinds and doors and windows and locks to television and computer and work he does by himself, without any movement in his limbs, using voice.

    All off-the-shelf stuff as far as I know, they're very middle class and bog standard insurance, no huge budget, just a lot of his expertise and his wife's hands to set it all up over the years.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Yes. Try Nuance products (e.g. Dragon, etc.) by theskipper · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who is a quadriplegic and lives in an electric chair.

      Hopefully he's configured the recognition output for "flip switch" to /dev/null ;)

      (Seriously though, his story is both impressive and uplifting. Good on him.)

  24. Try Tazti Speech Recognition Software by aravenwood · · Score: 1

    I sympathize. There aren't a lot of options for people with disability or disease conditions that impair their mobility who still want to interact with their PC. Most speech products are transcription products, and then there's Cortana which I've never really used. But there is one product I can recommend, called "tazti" speech recognition. I know a number of disabled people who use tazti to control their PC and play video games. It's *not* dictation software like Dragon, only command and control for the PC. You create custom speech commands and then specify what they do - Basic PC functions, mouse and keyboard, sending keystrokes, running programs or opening files or bat files etc. It doesn't control mouse movement but it lets you click and double click the mouse. And you can group commands together for profiles - for example you can have a different custom profile for each program or game, and you turn on and off the profiles using your voice. And you can download some pre-build profiles. The other big thing about tazti is that's it highly customizable. You an create Macro commands activated by voice for games or programs as well. And they have good customer support as well. It's really neat, and while it may not provide 100% coverage for your mom, it covers a whole lot of ground and may be really helpful to her, a big improvement over what what she currently has. Anyway, like I said, I know disabled gamers who use it to play games, and people with disabilities who use it to interact with their PC. It's worth checking out. The URL is https://tazti.com/.

  25. Voice dictation would be nice... by rklrkl · · Score: 1

    I was shocked that neither Amazon Echo nor Google Home can take voice dictation! They've got speech recognition, so surely they should be able to at least convert that to text and have it read back in Alexa/Google's voice later on at a bare minimum (this assumes it can't record audio and play it back later...which would be nice too).

    Before you mention EchoScribe, that was a total hack involving an external microphone amongst other kludges (and the website is sneaky not mentioning the kludges up front)!

  26. Google assistant user here by stewski · · Score: 1

    I have to say if google mini is anything to go by, we are at the stage where if you accept account linkage and storing your requests by an ad company, we can reach parity with a bad 80s style text adventure, think "use lock" "turn key" "open the damn door you useless pos"! I use plex with phlex tv written by a single dev afaik which does a better job of finding correct songs from my library than google in google music with the same songs, also google hobble using assistant on tablets and have no viable pc version, also cortana looks as though it wants to key log before operating! I seriously hope mozilla and baidus open source speech recognitions pulls us away from the crap Ive seen so far!

  27. Android? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Android (with Google) has excellent voice control. At least for what I have tried.

    "Email to {name of my contact}" opens a blank email (in Gmail) and then asks me "what's the message"? Say the message and that becomes the body.

    Then it asks "do you want to send this?" and you answer yes or no. It all works fine.

    Haven't tried too much else, but "play {artist} on Spotify" starts Spotify and plays artist radio for that artist. I would imagine many other apps work similarly.

    1. Re:Android? by stewski · · Score: 1

      On a tablet the google assistant is hobbled from running all times when the screen is on, most likely so they can shift a bunch of crap £35-50 mini speakers that do bizarre things like saying the free version of spotify cant play song requests on them (but can on when sent to my chrome cast). Additionally the eco system (shudders) can't play a movie I have bought on google play movies on my chromecast, but can play things from netflix, utter joke in my opinion. As I said above a single dev for an add on to plex media server (phlex) has done a better job than the multi billion corporate 'competing' with Amazon. Home automation currently reminds me of early networking, full of proprietary islands of poop that needs to be standardised or die.

    2. Re:Android? by shanen · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I'm here because I was asked to metamoderate this comment and wanted more context, but it feels like I'm mostly trying to assess the metamoderation. My legacy sentiment was that the metamoderation is even worse than the moderation, but I don't know that much about it...

      First, as regards your comment, I came to see the context because you didn't mention the Subject: line. I do use Android and Mac dictation quite a bit, but not the way you do, so I don't know that part of it... I basically use the dictation for searches (on Android) and text input of email bodies (on both). Yet you seem to have skipped over the Subject: part, but I don't want to test it right now. (Yeah, now I think I should and probably will try it, but for now I'm just evaluating YOUR comment here.)

      Second, as regards the metamoderation, there was no moderation to meta. After doing several prior comments, I now understand that it will display some moderation tags after I make my + or - choice, but what does that mean? I'm supposed to say whether I think it deserves an actual mod of some kind? If I pick one in the short window, then it will count in some way? (In that case, it's quite unreasonable to ask for mods without context, since context drives meaning.)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  28. Other options by xlsior · · Score: 1

    There are other assistive technologies other than speech control -- e.g. keyboard with keyguards. Essentially a plastic overlay for the keyboard where you can rest your hands directly on the keyboard itself without accidentally pressing any, but it has holes through which to actually reach individual keys.

    Windows itself has accessbility features as well, such as StickyKeys (press modifier keys separately instead of simultaneously) and FilterKeys (ignore rapid succession keypresses)

    There's other assistive technologies for people with Parkinson's and/or tremors as well, quick google search shows dozens of different approaches. Don't ignore voice control of course, but don't think it's the only option.

  29. Natalie Portman naked and petrified by ArthurVandelay9092 · · Score: 1

    Hey Siri, pour hot grits down my pants

  30. Mac must have had voice back in the 80s by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    Voice as an option on Macs must have been around longer than we think. Back in '86 when I was working at Plexicorp, a visiting professor from Edinburgh University tried to use my boss's Mac as if it had a voice interface. He ended up falling back to the keyboard. He seem very bemused to have to use such a primitive interface. The prof seemed to really know about engineering.

  31. PD affects speech in advanced cases. by Anomalous+Co-worker · · Score: 1

    I have Parkinson's disease. It affects people differently. I use speech recognition productively, but in advanced cases, the speech of the person with PD can be adversely affected. If this is the case, computer speech recognition is not going to help.

  32. My Father, Rocket Scientist With Parkinsonâ(T by Nonsanity · · Score: 1

    My father â" a true rocket scientist, programmer, and all-around nerd â" lived with Parkinsonâ(TM)s for 16 years. When typing started to become difficult, he used Dragon, as others here have mentioned. After getting his first Deep Brain Stimulator, his tremors became controlled enough that he could resume almost full normal use of the computer, falling back to voice recognition only when needing to input large quantities of text. Of course, the disease is progressive, and eventually using a computer became too difficult either way, mainly due to difficulty maintaining concentration. A voice interface may make some things easier, but it also makes many things more difficult. As far as I know, there is no comprehensive voice interface system that addresses all the needs of a typical computer user, let alone one suffering from a neuro-degenerative disease.

  33. Let me check by DeVilla · · Score: 1

    I asked my computer. It said "No".