Slashdot Mirror
Calls to Action on the Fifth Anniversary of the Death of Aaron Swartz (eff.org)
On the fifth anniversary of the death of Aaron Swartz, EFF activist Elliot Harmon posted a remembrance:
When you look around the digital rights community, it's easy to find Aaron's fingerprints all over it. He and his organization Demand Progress worked closely with EFF to stop SOPA. Long before that, he played key roles in the development of RSS, RDF, and Creative Commons. He railed hard against the idea of government-funded scientific research being unavailable to the public, and his passion continues to motivate the open access community. Aaron inspired Lawrence Lessig to fight corruption in politics, eventually fueling Lessig's White House run... It's tempting to become pessimistic in the face of countless threats to free speech and privacy. But the story of the SOPA protests demonstrates that we can win in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds.
He shares a link to a video of Aaron's most inspiring talk, "How We Stopped SOPA," writing that "Aaron warned that SOPA wouldn't be the last time Hollywood attempted to use copyright law as an excuse to censor the Internet... 'The enemies of the freedom to connect have not disappeared... We won this fight because everyone made themselves the hero of their own story. Everyone took it as their job to save this crucial freedom. They threw themselves into it. They did whatever they could think of to do.'"
On the anniversary of Aaron's death, his brother Ben Swartz, an engineer at Twitch, wrote about his own efforts to effect change in ways that would've made Aaron proud, while Aaron's mother urged calls to Congress to continue pushing for reform to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
And there were countless other remembrances on Twitter, including one fro Cory Doctorow, who tweeted a link to Lawrence Lessig's analysis of the prosecution. And Lessig himself marked the anniversary with several posts on Twitter. "None should rest," reads one, "for still, there is no peace."
He shares a link to a video of Aaron's most inspiring talk, "How We Stopped SOPA," writing that "Aaron warned that SOPA wouldn't be the last time Hollywood attempted to use copyright law as an excuse to censor the Internet... 'The enemies of the freedom to connect have not disappeared... We won this fight because everyone made themselves the hero of their own story. Everyone took it as their job to save this crucial freedom. They threw themselves into it. They did whatever they could think of to do.'"
On the anniversary of Aaron's death, his brother Ben Swartz, an engineer at Twitch, wrote about his own efforts to effect change in ways that would've made Aaron proud, while Aaron's mother urged calls to Congress to continue pushing for reform to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
And there were countless other remembrances on Twitter, including one fro Cory Doctorow, who tweeted a link to Lawrence Lessig's analysis of the prosecution. And Lessig himself marked the anniversary with several posts on Twitter. "None should rest," reads one, "for still, there is no peace."
...you control the people.
Information wants to be free = people want to be free, this is what we fight for. Those who are in control, wants to have MORE control. You're always guilty unless proven innocent in the eyes of those who have everything to hide fro you. A thief thinks everyone steals.
Once information is free - those in power realize they must abide by those who hired them to do the job of government in the first place - we the people did, we are their entire purpose, not the other way around. Freedom of information means that no one is safe if they do wrong, because it becomes hard to hide from the general population, and that's the way it should me.
Freedom = to be free, free from tyranny and control.
What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
year of the lunix desktop?
Year of suicide prevention. Aaron Schwartz unfortunately committed suicide. People who commit suicide mostly do so in order to end their own suffering. The reality however is that this does not lower the total amount of suffering in the world. Instead, their family and friends will inherent their suffering, thus any suicide will only increase the total amount of suffering in the world. Ergo: the act of suicide is probably the most egoistic act in the world: to end ones own perceived suffering resulting in an increased amount of suffering in others.
Suicide awareness is more important. The national suicide prevention hotline can be found at 1-800-273-8255.
I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
When you think rape tribunals on college campuses are a good idea. Or accusing people of sex assault without trial ruins their careers.
Schwartz would have understood that. Knew what extreme ideology looked like.
Please, you had Google, and other big money do the job. You're like those Taylor Camp hippies living "off the land" in Hawaii. Turns out they were collecting food stamps. You people stopped nothing! Popular movements without huge finance go nowhere. And besides, what have we gained? Sites are still being shut down and owners arrested everywhere. Bittorrent isn't working so well anymore. And Google is a filtering Nazi! Can't even find small clips. No, if you spent your time developing ad hoc real P2P networks, THEN you would be a hero. As it is you died being nothing more than a "merry prankster", a sad "merry prankster"
And Lessig? No thank you! His tirades against free speech* are positively fascist. Don't want... nope... definitely don't want.
*(euphemised as "campaign reform, not understanding the irony that if he were to win, the issue would be moot)
No one really believes he did that giving the continuing pattern of suicide amoung those fighting for privacy causes but good thing you folks at Three Letter stopped by to ambiguate.
Everyone else may have agendas and fail in their full diligence, but Fox fails INTENTIONALLY since its inception
If you claim Fox News is propaganda, without saying CNN is propaganda, MSNBC is propaganda, the NYT is propaganda, then how can we respect your hyper-partisan views?
Here's a hint: It's all propaganda now. Most journalism now is driving you to think a certain way, providing facts that fit a narrative and omitting ones that do not.
Until you realize that you yourself are just another tool of propaganda by denouncing a single source and implying the others are reliable.
P.S. Fox News was not any more designed as propaganda than any of the other news sources, it evolved like the rest of them to where we are now. To claim there is any difference between what Fox is doing and what CNN is doing is what I take exception at. You cannot label them differently.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
>to end ones own perceived suffering resulting in an increased amount of suffering in others.
"perceived?" Are you saying his suffering was not as real as his family's suffering? I am curious as to how you measure suffering, as you assert that the total amount of suffering does not go down. What instruments do you use? How are they calibrated?
Swartz's ideals were right but his methods were pure idiocy. He could have downloaded all those papers at his desk and released them and he would not have faced anywhere near as much trouble. Instead he entered a wiring closet at the university library without permission and did his downloads there. Being as his office was already on the school's wired network it is unlikely he would have obtained the papers much slower from his office than from the wiring closet that he unlawfully entered.
He then made himself into a martyr by taking the coward's way out of the charges that were being brought against him.
The real lesson we should learn here is to watch out for signs of mental health disorders in those close to us. Afterwards people came forward and expressed concerns they had for him, though there was no record of him having sought treatment in his final months. It's a shame that he took his own life, but we really should take a look at the entirety of what he did to get himself into trouble (rather than cherry-picking it like some want us to) before we celebrate him.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
Pls shut the fuck up you and shove your puritanical preaching up your asshole. My grandfather committed suicide after a long cancer bout because he just couldn't take it anymore even though the doctors wanted to keep him alive, to pad tgeir wallets another year or two. His wife and children were sad, but happy for him and relieved. He went through hell.
No one independent of my direct aid, and I mean no one, is entitled to my presence or that I live my life for them. It's my life, not yours.
It doesn't matter to me what the origins may have been; it matters what things are.
I find it pretty stupid to judge the starting point of organizations that were founded decades ago against the more recent Fox News, which was formed when outlets were already turning partisan and was just a bit ahead of the curve.
I'm not dealing in whataboutism; I deal in simple hard truths. And that is that Fox News is no more partisan now than any major news outlet (except possibly the Wall St Journal).
I also find it telling that you hide behind the AC mask to critique others... obviously that makes your opinion on the subject worth quite a bit less than mine.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Your life is not your own but a gift from God whether you choose to believe that or not.
How would that make it not mine? When someone gives me a gift for Christmas, or my birthday, that gift is mine. If I want to pitch it into the fireplace, I'm free to do so. Nobody who gives a gift would insist that they still own it.
If your "god" thinks he still owns the things he gifts, he's a friggin sociopath.
He killed himself over three fucking months in some minimum security camp fed 'prison'? What a fucking PUSSY.
My grandfather committed suicide after a long cancer
Which is sad, and should have been unnecessary. Civilized countries offer alternative solutions in the form of euthanasia.
No one independent of my direct aid, and I mean no one, is entitled to my presence or that I live my life for them. It's my life, not yours.
And that's not what I'm saying. All I am saying is that instead of one person having a bad time, after a suicide a lot of people have to live with losing someone they love.
I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
There are no gods. And if they were they would owe explanations as to why they are such terrible beings.
Aaron Swartz was a crook stealing computer time. He was facing conviction and was too much of a pussy to take it like a man,
So what you're saying is, all real men support coerced false confession and state-sponsored rape?
He was a righteous man, and a hero to many. Whereas you are but a stain on the floor of a public restroom.
Does the NGO pay you $0.25 per moronically racist post? Or have they raised it to $0.30 now?
Wait... "he got what was coming to him"? Are you saying the good people of Boston have errected a heroic statue of Schwartz in front of City Hall? I hadn't heard that, but it's good to know.
Coerced false confessions FTW! Feed the Gulag!
Euthanasia is nothing more than state sponsored suicide. To try to cloak it in anytbing else is to say suicide is ok.
Fun distinction: If this was Reddit, your comment probably would have been removed for being "offensive."
Like how they removed all the comments for blood donation addresses after the Pulse Nightclub massacre. (Nothing says progressive, like censoring help for dying gay people!)
https://motherboard.vice.com/e...
If your "god" thinks he still owns the things he gifts, he's a friggin sociopath.
Was that your first clue?
Politicians, corporate executives, and other dangerous sociopaths are looked upon so favorably in our culture because we have a long history of worshipping dangerous sociopaths.
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
Euthanasia is nothing more than state sponsored suicide. To try to cloak it in anytbing else is to say suicide is ok.
This is not true at all. Euthanasia, by definition, has nothing to do with state sponsorship.
Let's take the human factor out of it. When a vet has to euthanize a dog...is the state paying for it? No. How about a horse? No? Dr. Kevorkian's patients...did the state pay for any of those? No? Hm. But they were all cases of euthanasia. Even if a country were to subsidize it (directly or indirectly) that does not change the meaning of the term, any more than a European country having state-sponsored colleges, free of cost, means that "college" includes "state-sponsored" in its definition.
The word is important because it confers a crucial distinction. Suicide (rightly) carries a stigma of a person in pain that can be escaped via other means. Euthanasia, by it's very definition, relates to death being imminent anyways, and the aversion of pain that is otherwise unavoidable and inescapable. There's a massive difference between a person who is misguided as they end their life when there is another way, and a person who has no other alternative and would prefer to die with dignity than suffer for several months without it and die soon anyways.
For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
Politicians, corporate executives, and other dangerous sociopaths are looked upon so favorably in our culture because we have a long history of worshipping dangerous sociopaths.
No, that's stupid. You could equally argue that The Beatles and Beethoven are looked upon so favourably because we have a long history of worshipping sociopaths. The only difference being that, in that case, you would at least be accurately describing the perception of the vast majority of mankind, whereas in your example you're painting a silly strawman which may apply to some tiny fraxction of humanity. I know far more people who despise or, at best, mildly tolerate politicians and corporate executives than I do folks who "look favourably upon them".
There are always exceptions, of course; most of us look favourably on Elon Musk and Abraham Lincoln, for example. But if you're going to suggest that those of us who appreaciate their contributions are "worshipping sociopaths" then you are clearly far more unhinged than any of the people you're railing against.