Slashdot Mirror


Apple Gives Employees $2,500 Bonuses After New Tax Law (bloomberg.com)

Apple told employees that it's issuing a bonus of $2,500 of restricted stock units, following the introduction of the new U.S. tax law. "The iPhone maker will begin issuing grants to most employees worldwide in the coming months," reports Bloomberg. Apple also announced today that it would bring back most of its cash from overseas and spend $30 billion in the U.S. over the next five years. From the report: Apple confirmed the bonuses in response to a Bloomberg inquiry Wednesday. The Cupertino, California-based company joins a growing list of American businesses that have celebrated the introduction of corporate-friendly tax law with one-time bonuses for staff. AT&T, Comcast, JetBlue, and Wal-Mart also said they were giving bonuses.

20 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Why? by Lynal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can any corporate finance experts explain why companies would do this? Should we buy that they're just being generous/trying to foster goodwill?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It gives the politicians who give away massive amounts of wealth to the corporations a simple talking point.

    2. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More deficits? What the hell do you think Obama did doubling the national debt in 8 years?

      BTW, The CBO used 3% growth in their assumed GDP growth. IF we exceed this by about 1/2% (and we currently ARE) or more, the total tax receipts will actually go UP due to the tax cut.

    3. Re: Why? by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BINGO! Precisely it. This is about employee retention above all else. Those of us of a certain age have seen this in the IT industry prior to Y2K. Back then we were seeing bonuses randomly throughout the year several times more than Apple is giving here, and it was a check instead of stock.

    4. Re:Why? by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can any corporate finance experts explain why companies would do this? Should we buy that they're just being generous/trying to foster goodwill?

      Why they'd give employees bonuses? Retention, mostly. This is obvious, isn't it?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Why? by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bonuses are the new raise. Because they can get immediate recognition for it, and then conveniently forget to give it ever again.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. The debt nearly doubled under Obama, but it would have been worse without him. Just because in his eight years it increased almost as much as it did the prior 232 years doesn't mean it's his fault.

    7. Re:Why? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It gives the politicians who give away massive amounts of wealth to the corporations a simple talking point.

      That's why this move makes very little sense. I've never thought of anybody in Apple's upper echelons as being a Trump supporter by any stretch of the imagination.

      There must be some tax advantage to doing this. Either that or they're bleeding people to Tesla, Google, and Facebook. Or both.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It gives the politicians who give away massive amounts of wealth to the corporations a simple talking point.

      WTF?!?!!?

      NOT TAKING from the people being governed is now "giv[ing] away massive amounts of wealth"?

      So if I don't rob you at gunpoint, I gave you the contents of your wallet?

      What the fuck is wrong with you?

    9. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      #taxationistheft

      In many ways, it is.

      And if you don't think it's by coercion, try not paying any taxes as an experiment.

      Just see how long it takes for the government to send out guys with guns to haul in away in chains - literally.

    10. Re:Why? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It gives the politicians who give away massive amounts of wealth to the corporations a simple talking point.

      That's why this move makes very little sense. I've never thought of anybody in Apple's upper echelons as being a Trump supporter by any stretch of the imagination.

      Quite right, they aren't. Puzzling, isn't it?

      Maybe ... just maybe ... a better tax environment is better for business, which is better for paid non-governmental employment. Maybe wascally wepubwicans aren't as awful as you thought.

    11. Re:Why? by Morky · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What the fuck is wrong with YOU? Please describe your alternate utopian society where there is no taxation.

  2. bloody hell...just how neo-con is this site now? by dAzED1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The combined income of the employees walmart has laid off since that announcement substantially dwarfs the "bonus" offered. The "bonus" was to people who had worked for Walmart for at least 20 years, btw. A pretty sad group.

  3. Re:bloody hell...just how neo-con is this site now by jwhyche · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Calling Bullshit on this. Bullshit!

    Of course you could cite credible sources and prove your case.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  4. Why WOULDN'T they? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are a million reasons I can think of.

    If all you can do is ascribe selfish reasons to any action, then here is one for you - with some many companies having more money to spend, there were be a lot more poaching of workers going on, and companies are trying to head defection off at the pass by fostering goodwill among employees.

    But again only for absolutely selfish reasons, could not be they are just passing along some good fortune to those that helped them get where they are.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. You've gone mental Mr Huffpo by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ask me how I know you've gone mental with liberal hate.

    Ok, here's how I know - because the story is about APPLE. not WALMART.

    APPLE just announced they are hiring 200k employees over the next five years and spending tens of billions more in the US, since they can finally bring money back from overseas. There are no layoffs.

    Meanwhile in completely unrelated news WALMART is just one of many companies giving out bonuses, that just happens to also be laying off some workers. That does not change the benefit of what they are doing for the workers. Nor even does it recognize the reality of a company like Walmart being so large they have different cost centers...

    There are many, many companies giving out bonuses and most of them are not doing layoffs. That they are giving out bonuses is mostly a good sign they will be hiring soon.

    You seriously need to re-think your life at this point, four more years of good news will literally eat your brain and leave you destitute and unable to cope with life. Why would good news do that to anyone? Don't let it happen to you man.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  6. "After" is carrying a lot of water here by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I read the linked article, and I couldn't help but notice that the only thing joining the tax law and Apple's bonuses was temporal proximity. The author conspicuously chooses to use words like "after" and "following the introduction of," assiduously avoiding the more concrete "because of." The author also doesn't attribute anything the company actually stated to the tax law, citing instead some phoney-baloney hogwash about "confidence in Apple’s future."

    In fact, if you read the text of the email sent by Tim Cook to Apple employees, you don't see mention of tax policy anywhere--which is weird, seeing as Bloomberg puts "New Tax Law" right in the headline.

    It's almost as if Bloomberg.com were blowing smoke up our collective asses and calling it an invigorating Goop.com vapor colonic.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  7. Re:Impossible. RUSSIANS. by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More probably than not they're just trying to get all the EU profits they didn't pay any taxes on back home as quickly as possible on now after the EU knows about this after someone blew the whistle on their illegal and secret deal with the Irish.

    --
    "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
  8. Bonuses are much cheaper than pay raises by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you're a big company, and you don't want trouble from the government. Of course you're going to do something, if you can, to make yourself look good!

    But notice how all these announcements are about bonuses, not pay raises. A bonus is just a one-time event, pay raises keep on giving, month after month. These companies aren't really putting their money where their mouth is, they just want to make a splash in the news.

  9. Restricted stock units? by mark_reh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And they call that a bonus?

    I'll bet the execs get unrestricted stock.

    Same BS, different decade.

    I was an engineer in the 90s and got stock options the day my company went public. The tee shirt I got on that day ended up worth more than the stock.

    If it isn't cash, it's worthless. Don't accept this BS in lieu of money or even actual stock. It's a PR gimmick.