Slashdot Mirror
Tim Cook Says Power Management Feature In Older iPhones Will Be Able To Be Turned Off In Future Update (macrumors.com)
In an interview with Rebecca Jarvis of ABC News, Apple CEO Tim Cook touched on the ongoing controversy over power management features in older iPhones. He says that a future update will allow customers to turn off the power management feature that has caused older iPhones to slow down. Mac Rumors reports: According to Cook, when the power management features were first introduced in iOS 10.2.1, Apple did explain what was going on, but following the controversy, he believes Apple should have been clearer. The company did indeed mention that the shutdown issue was caused by uneven power delivery and explained that its power management system had been tweaked, but there was no clear notice that it could cause devices to operate more slowly at times. Cook says Apple "deeply apologizes" to customers who thought the company had other motivations. Apple is introducing better battery monitoring features in a future iOS update, and Cook says Apple will also allow customers to turn off the power management feature, which is new information that the company has not previously shared. The majority of the interview was focused on the announcements that Apple made today. The company plans to contribute $350 billion in the U.S. economy over the next five years, as well as issue employees a bonus of $2,500 of restricted stock units following the introduction of the new U.S. tax law.
Tim Cook says...
Frosty Piss says he doesn't give a shit about this tempest in a tea pot spun up by Apple haters, lawyers looking for a buck, and people that get OUTRAGED at any and everything. Folks, step back from the Internet. But I will be taking my iPhone 5s in to have an Amazing Genius(TM) replace the battery for cheap...
If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
What Apple did is a very useful feature. I would rather have my iOS device slow down than crash because the battery is over taxed by surging processor power needs. Empowering the user is even better so that people who want their devices to crash can be satisfied too. All for that!
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Bugs are features.
(Ancient saying from the Internets.)
All this time Apple has been gaslighting us....yes, boys and girls, the update DOES slow down your igadger....
This is something that could be solved if the phone was made marginally thicker to support a slightly higher voltage battery.
Where is the outrage over something that is literally "defective by design"? Cell phone manufactures fucked up big time here. Apple is getting away with this because they're pushing it as some unavoidable thing, and their software patches are here to save the day. This is 100% irrelevant and they know it. There should have been a recall over all the handhelds sold in this state. They knew what would happen, and they chose to ignore it because "OMG MAH THIN DEEEVICES". You can't tell me that a company with > $200B in the bank didn't know how their batteries would react with age and how this would cause the CPU to brown out and automatically reset itself.
They're scrambling now to produce a software patch because it's clear this is a huge PR issue for them **AND** they know users are falling for the whole "it's a software issue, sorry" thing when the actual hardware design is borked. Yes, this can be mitigated by software. Doesn't change the fact that the design is bad, and Apple willingly sold these devices knowing full well what would happen to them as they aged.
That's what people should be outraged about. Buying a premium device for a premium price and getting something that Apple knew would fail in N years and would require silicon throttling just to prevent the issue from rebooting the phone. It may not have been willful planned obsolescence, but Apple damned well knew what they were doing when they sold these devices and continued to sell them without a full recall.
Not what I needed. What I needed to know was you were doing it in the first place before I replace two iPhones due to performance issues instead of buying new batteries.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
And that is exactly what Apple has done; provided a toggle so people can turn this off if they like phones that do not last as long on battery when the batteries age.
Why would anyone flip that switch? I'm personally not sure, but that's how every other phone in the world works today so...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
apples continual lying and screwing over of the tech industry or the mindless sheep that cheer them on.
Apple has been forgetting to pay their taxes in Europe... yet, they seem happy to pay taxes in the US... It's time to pay up !
What is phase 2?
The real issue is that the computing and display hardware of modern smartphones have a much longer serviceable lifespan than the battery. Many users could easily use the same phone for 3 - 5 years before feeling there's value in upgrading. But the battery is nearly always the first component to go (unless you break the display).
So, the decision to make the phone virtually impossible for the average user to open, to make the battery as difficult as possible to replace, cannot be seen as anything but an attempt to force users to upgrade more frequently and increase revenue. And this is where the problem really lies--the planned obsolescence propped up by the myth that these devices get slower or perform poorly after a few years.
If Apple and other smartphone manufacturers were truly sincere about doing the right thing, they would make models with user replaceable batteries. Rather than shaving off another 0.5 mm from an already thin device (after all, has anyone actually complained that their device is too thick?); rather than fucking around with software that tells you when your battery is failing (you don't need the phone to tell you what you already figured out from using it); rather than offering discounted battery replacements, which only serves to deflect from the truth--they just need to give the user the ability to do what they used to be able to do with mobile phones.
To those manufacturers who do offer smartphones with user replaceable batteries, kudos. Sadly, you are at a competitive disadvantage for your customer-friendly decision.
I went in and said I wanted a replacement battery. This lousy hipster tried to guilt trip me by saying I should "consider the ecological impact" of taking advantage of the offer. I said okay...I still want the replacement.
I didn't cause this problem; Apple did. I don't need some tree hugger trying to guilt trip me. Apple can recycle my old battery. Just replace the battery and fix the problem YOUR company caused without the Greenpeace pitch.
Then he asked for my passcode so they could run diagnostics. I said no, you're not getting my passcode.
Needless to say he and I didn't get along.
This is fantastic news!
Everyone who is upset about the phone shutting down when it's in danger of simply shutting of on over-current, and destroying their filesystem, rather than showing down, can turn it off.
And then their iPhones, instead of slowing down, will shut off and destroy their filesystems.
And then they won't be able to call anyone to bitch about it, because they will have bricked their iPhones.
Genius!
appler: It's just that we'll make sure that the update will be in the future, long future.
I cant think anyone buys in to that lame ass excuse. This should be investigated same as Wolksvagen dieselgate cos Apple seems to have made more money than germany tricking people to buy new phones.
Even i was avare of this fact with no way to prove it with the first 3 gen iphones when a new one came out. Go Android with manual poversave switch..
only some true evangelists can beleive this garbage.
This entire problem pretty much boils down to the obsessive need to make the next slimmest phone on the marked, while still being more powerful then the last model. And while mobile processing technology is improving, we are still using and demanding more and more from the the same decades old Lithium battery technology.
A apologize is done when you have done a person or person's wrong. Really difficult to defend Apple anymore, they make bad decisions that at least look on the surface not to benefit customers, but to benefit Apple.
It's not sufficient to allow users to toggle the slowdown without also informing them that the battery is in a state where the OS is likely decide to throttle the device. Apple's way doesn't allow the users to make an informed decision on either the toggle ir in replacing the battery.
But if Apple did that the right way, users would know how long Apple batteries last. And that would be bad for business, especially ehen customers compare it to the competition...
"it's called hobbling Paul...."
Last time I checked modern cars still used internal combustion engines. Other than programming the ECU all the mechanical parts are serviceable. You think only the flunkees at the stealership are capable of changing brake rotors or an mass air flow sensor? Your car battery comment is equally dumb. Car batteries have a core charge, they pay YOU for the old one.
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
I would like to personally thank Tim Cook for allowing me to control power management on my own phone. It saves me the bother of downloading and running Open Source software.
Apple is making america great again.
The power management features being quietly turned on/off is really missing the mark here. Even when relatively new, iPhone 6/6s tend to shut down randomly, presumably due to voltage, even if the battery is sufficiently charged. This is especially true in cold weather. The battery simply isn't sufficiently paired for the hardware. These devices need batteries that can handle a higher maximum load. Replacing the battery with a newer one of the same specification only solves half the problem.
just let end users replace the battery when in gets old.
What this shows is that user pressure works (sometimes at least). A relatively minor problem (IMO) turned huge and then was all over the media. It even got Apple, a company with a known attitude of "We know what's best for you" to add an option to disable the controversial feature.
The sad part (IMO) is that this hasn't happened for some basic freedoms and features that one would've taken for granted of computers only a few years ago like being able to install software not approved by nanny Apple, or having administrator rights over a device you supposedly own.
In an era in which software and hardware companies are adding more and more anti user features this proves that we can force them to change
You can already find reports of people with iPhones that do this... or other smartphones...
You just need to look. Most people on Slashdot either get phones often enough or replace batteries in a few years, which means they would not encounter this. But there are a world of people with old phones and old batteries that have this happen - Apple was trying to help them and paid the usual price for good deeds.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion