Slashdot Mirror
Top Bug Hunters Make 2.7 Times More Money Than an Average Software Engineer (bleepingcomputer.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: A survey of 1,700 bug bounty hunters registered on the HackerOne platform reveals that top white-hat hackers make on average 2.7 times more money than the average salary of a software engineer in the same country. The reported numbers are different for each country and may depend on a bug bunter's ability to find bugs, but the survey's results highlight the rising popularity of bug hunting as a sustainable profession, especially in less developed countries, where it can help talented programmers live a financially care-free life. According to HackerOne's report, it pays to be a vulnerability researcher in India, where top bug hunters can make 16 times more compared to the average salary of a software engineer. Other countries where bug hunting can assure someone a comfortable living are Argentina (x15.6), Egypt (x8.1), Hong Kong (x7.6), the Philippines (x5.4), and Latvia (x5.2).
Ok, but how much does an average bug hunter make vs a top software engineer? Or an average bug hunter vs an average software engineer?
I mean this is an Apples vs Oranges comparison there.
You can take the top of nearly any (professional) profession and compare it to the average of others and you see that the best of the best makes more then the average guy does.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
To everyone complaining about the comparison between the top of bug hunters and the average software engineer, you are clearly missing the point. They aren't trying to present a meaningful comparison of two fields, they are trying to paint a statistically inaccurate picture of luxury in order to flood the market and drive average wages down. C'mon, is this everybody's first day on /. or something?
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.