Slashdot Mirror


1.7-Billion-Year-Old Chunk of North America Found Sticking To Australia (livescience.com)

walterbyrd shares a report from Live Science: Geologists matching rocks from opposite sides of the globe have found that part of Australia was once attached to North America 1.7 billion years ago. Researchers from Curtin University in Australia examined rocks from the Georgetown region of northern Queensland. The rocks -- sandstone sedimentary rocks that formed in a shallow sea -- had signatures that were unknown in Australia but strongly resembled rocks that can be seen in present-day Canada. The researchers, who described their findings online Jan. 17 in the journal Geology, concluded that the Georgetown area broke away from North America 1.7 billion years ago. Then, 100 million years later, this landmass collided with what is now northern Australia, at the Mount Isa region.

"This was a critical part of global continental reorganization when almost all continents on Earth assembled to form the supercontinent called Nuna," Adam Nordsvan, Curtin University doctoral student and lead author of the study, said in a statement. Nordsvan added that Nuna then broke apart some 300 million years later, with the Georgetown area stuck to Australia as the North American landmass drifted away.

122 comments

  1. Theft and larceny by TimothyHollins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that why we sent the Australians over there in the first place?

    1. Re: Theft and larceny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, first we sent americans

    2. Re:Theft and larceny by Ian+A.+Shill · · Score: 1

      How do they sleep at night?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      For hire.
    3. Re:Theft and larceny by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Isn't that why we sent the Australians over there in the first place?

      Actually the reason that convicts were transported to Australia is because the Brits could no longer dump them in North America due to that pesky revolution thingy.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re: Theft and larceny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No-one loves you. Sorry.

    5. Re:Theft and larceny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean the damn Aussie convicts.

    6. Re:Theft and larceny by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh come on now. That's just because they couldn't dump them in the colonies anymore, they were still doing that in Upper and Lower Canada and the colonial state of Newfoundland. Despite what the wikipedia article says, the crown was still shipping them to north america until the very late 1700's(round about 1795ish), but only into lands "just far enough" to not make it an issue for the newly founded US. See there was even a trick to it, they would declare the prisoners being sent to an "unknown location" and then basically dump them in the territory or colonial state. Who'd then be responsible for well...everything, from feeding to housing, and so on while it "was in dispute with the crown." And that could take years, and in the mean time the prisoners would/could be forced onto a plantation while arguing with the crown over it.

      Lot's of bits of history like that which really doesn't get fully covered. Here's an example from 1789, also covers some other stuff but worth the reading.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re: Theft and larceny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the Russian

    8. Re: Theft and larceny by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Trump will get it back. There is already a petition started.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    9. Re:Theft and larceny by mysidia · · Score: 1

      You cant "steal" land by moving it. he property just moves with you.

      Now we have learned something new.... a portion of southern Australia is actually part of Canada.

      Better get ready to start paying your backtaxes, folks.

    10. Re: Theft and larceny by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
      Well, since the article says that the chunk broke off what is now Canada, it should be entertaining* to watch Trump try come up with an even half way plausible basis for a US claim on that rock.

      *problem is, world leaders, elected officials and the like aren't supposed to be entertaining, they're supposed to be competent. Picking a leader on the basis of who might provide the most lulz strikes me as a Bad Thing.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    11. Re:Theft and larceny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. You should write about it in the article on wikipedia.

    12. Re:Theft and larceny by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Researchers from Curtin University in Australia examined rocks from the Georgetown region of northern Queensland.

      Now we have learned something new.... a portion of southern Australia is actually part of Canada.

      I see by your grasp of geography that you hail from the land of Canada's southern neighbors.

    13. Re: Theft and larceny by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      Actually he will make the Mexicans get it back. All that rock will make a damned big wall.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    14. Re:Theft and larceny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he shouldn't. The only reason he "knows" so much about that particular time and imprisonment practices is because it's one of his "they enslaved white people too" memes. Mashiki is a vehement racist, particularly funny since he rocks that Japanese name.

    15. Re:Theft and larceny by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I see by your grasp of geography that you hail from the land of Canada's southern neighbors.

      Nooooo.... How dare you imply I have something to do with those filthy renegade colonists.

    16. Re:Theft and larceny by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      No he shouldn't. The only reason he "knows" so much about that particular time and imprisonment practices is because it's one of his "they enslaved white people too" memes. Mashiki is a vehement racist, particularly funny since he rocks that Japanese name.

      Or...or...it could be that you're an actual racist, since that's what you are focusing on. The reason that I happen to know is because one of my hobbies is the commonweath history of eastern canada.

      To the other AC: I have no interest in writing anything for wikipedia. Even if you can prove something factually correct, they have a much greater desire to present particular narratives. On top of that they've gone from "presenting verifiable fact" to "presenting 2nd and 3rd sources" of any kind as fact. A good example would be the spectre and meltdown articles on there currently.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  2. surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The entire earth is all connected to itself and the planet is not flat after all. This is earth shattering news!

  3. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thatâ(TM)s mine!!! Give it back!!!!

    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 I say we go put a flag on that chunk, also collect back taxes.

    2. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we should charge you taxes for looking after it for you.

  4. Bloody Americans. by mjwx · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dumping their crap on our own fair shores for billions of years... without even a thank you note.

    I hope you Chooks turn into Emus and kick your dunny down.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    1. Re:Bloody Americans. by Holi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Piss off, why you blaming us for some stupid Canadian rock?

      Thing probably already apologized to you.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Bloody Americans. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      As an American who has visited Port Douglas and Cairns (and Heron Island), I can completely understand a piece of America falling in love with, and attaching itself to, God's Own Country.

    3. Re:Bloody Americans. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Piss off, why you blaming us for some stupid Canadian rock? Thing probably already apologized to you.

      Because it's part of Queensland and you gave them extra room to propagate.

      WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!!!!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:Bloody Americans. by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      Did you not read the whole article?
      "Rocks that can be seen in present-day Canada"
      Looks like Hungcouver actually....

      --
      End of Line.
    5. Re: Bloody Americans. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Yes, I saw that. I stand by my statement. :-)

  5. For those of us by TFlan91 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of us that aren't geologists and saw "Nuna", but read/expected "Pangaea":

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:For those of us by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Colombia is part of Texas. And New Mexico, and probably Arizona...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:For those of us by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For most of us, even the highly educated, We have a High School or Middle School understanding of most topics. When we furthered our education, it for the most part had became specialized in particular areas, But for those who didn't specialize in that area, we have a limited understanding, in the topic. (Thank you for the link for additional information) Pangaea, was the latest Super Continent which we are shown during or basic education, as it is relatively recent enough that we could plainly see how the Continents fit together. "Nuna" had continental plates that do not look like what we know of, hence hard to teach to kids. And once we get older unless we study geology such topics isn't so relevant to other topics we choose to study.

      This brings up the disturbing trends of people not believing the experts in fields, and some of them are in leadership positions who's actions causes change.
      Now a leader may not follow the advice of the expert, because their may be factors beyond that particular field, that need to be weighed in, however these experts should be listened to as you gut instinct and general knowledge in most things are actually at a basic level.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:For those of us by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

    4. Re:For those of us by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      It's comforting that I'm not the only one.

      Thank you for the link.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:For those of us by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      When I was in grade school, Continental Drift was a hot new theory - well, not really new, a revived theory recently given prominence thanks in part due to advances in computer graphics that made it much easier to visualize the moving puzzle-pieces and experiment with differing arrangements.

    6. Re:For those of us by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of this "Nuna" before.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    7. Re:For those of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't believe religious leaders, but you attach "science" and all of the sudden you believe them? Theology has been methodically studied for two millenia longer than geology.

    8. Re:For those of us by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The speculation that continents might have 'drifted' was first put forward by Abraham Ortelius in 1596. The concept was independently and more fully developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912

      You should have a lower user ID if you're that old.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    9. Re:For those of us by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      The concept was independently and more fully developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912

      See Krakatoa by Simon Winchester for an excellent description of Wegener's continental drift concept. Winchester can be long winded and a bit full of himself, but he's an excellent researcher and I'm thoroughly enjoying the book.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    10. Re:For those of us by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

      scientists are fallible like anyone else, no reason to trust any one of them

      The system of science however has been reliably self-correcting for centuries now. Whether driven by self interest, curiosity or a sense of duty, scientist have a stake in exposing mistakes and correcting them. So yes, I trust that any big thing would be addressed and resolved and even small things get cleared up eventually

      --
      Nullius in verba
    11. Re:For those of us by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      You don't believe religious leaders, but you attach "science" and all of the sudden you believe them? Theology has been methodically studied for two millenia longer than geology.

      What predictions has that knowledge allowed humans to make? What in religion is falsifiable? Repeatable?

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    12. Re:For those of us by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      You don't believe religious leaders, but you attach "science" and all of the sudden you believe them? Theology has been methodically studied for two millenia longer than geology.

      I do believe geology was studied far earlier than theology, in that mining for gemstones and various ores predates almost all known religions and certainly all modern ones.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    13. Re:For those of us by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of this "Nuna" before.

      Thank you for your participation. Here's a trophy.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    14. Re:For those of us by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I thank you for the link as I curse you for the link. Now I have added yet another tab to the hundred that I have open, to look at when I quit wasting time on /..

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    15. Re: For those of us by DutchUncle · · Score: 2

      :-) I think it was 1968 or 1970 when the idea was revived with more support from new ground penetrating radar and other new geophysical information gathering techniques. Computer graphics helped make illustrative animations that sold the idea.

    16. Re:For those of us by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Continents fit together. "Nuna" had continental plates that do not look like what we know of, hence hard to teach to kids

      Considering the long age of the earth; it's ridiculous for almost anyone to think they have information on a significant fraction of the geologic history,
      but just because someone heard of Pangea or Nuna or whatever doesn't mean there weren't other supercontinents at different times.

      This brings up the disturbing trends of people not believing the experts in fields, and some of them are in leadership positions who's actions causes change.

      In reality all the extra education in specializations is for added skill and efficiency --- that doesn't mean what experts say should be yielded as dogma or instantly accepted.

      On trivial matters where stakes are low - the expert in the field might deserve a benefit of the doubt, BUT there are plenty of times people should not believe experts in the fields ---- before they are to be believed, they have a burden of explanation and proof that they should be equipped to handle as an expert.... even the best experts make mistakes often, and you should ALWAYS question and confirm information before you spread it or make an important decision off of it --- for example: The Geoligical history person would not be an expert in leadership or decisionmaking or publication or education, and not necessarily the true impact of what they found (Their story or views may simply be wrong), and if you fail to find overwhelming confirming support or you find contrary information an expert wasn't able to explain, then, well, that could be a legit reason not to believe said expert.

    17. Re:For those of us by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This brings up the disturbing trends of people not believing the experts in fields, and some of them are in leadership positions who's actions causes change. Now a leader may not follow the advice of the expert, because their may be factors beyond that particular field, that need to be weighed in, however these experts should be listened to as you gut instinct and general knowledge in most things are actually at a basic level.

      The trouble is in deconstructing knowledge from perspective and agenda. For example take the war on drugs, there's plenty of experts and organizations on both sides of the fence. If you ask a rehab clinic drugs leads to addicts, because the drug users they see are those who became addicted. The police will see criminal drug users. The psychologist will see drug users with psychological problems. On the other hand a medical marijuana shop may stand to make a huge profit if it's legalized for recreational use, they're not exactly neutral either. It's hard to find people that are highly knowledgeable about a topic and not deeply invested or biased in some way. I mean it works for Donald Knuth and CS, but in more practical matters it's not that easy to know who to believe. And people like to believe that the "experts" that agree with them are those that are right.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:For those of us by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I believe Religious leaders, in term of their view on religion. So if I have an issue in terms of faith, or making a moral choice, then a Religious Leader who has dedicated their lives to the religion.
      However their view on science, isn't that well respected, because of the lack of time they had individually studied it. There is also a lot of Bad Science reporting,
      Calling a new Hypothesis a Theory, Jumping the gun to a conclusion, people jumping on the band wagon of a popular idea without looking at the data. However Science works itself out over time. However if you want to disprove a scientific principal all you need to do is offer a new Hypothesis, Figure out what measurements would you'd see if you are right, take such measurements, compare them to your guess. If they are right, bring them to someone else to double check and verify.

      In my opinion if your Religion key points are about explaining the natural world, then it is sadly a very poor religion to follow.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:For those of us by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Awesome! This is exactly what I was fishing for. Now I'm going to track every post you make and make sure I put my two cents in, so when I collect enough trophies I can melt them down and get money for the scrap. Who the fuck was talking to you again?
      I was underscoring, along with others here, how esoteric this supercontinent is. Almost everyone is familiar with Pangaea. Nuna? Not so much.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    20. Re:For those of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was expecting it to be Gondwanaland.

    21. Re:For those of us by youngone · · Score: 1

      Theology has probably been "studied" since the first priest caste formed maybe 10,000 years ago when the species began forming structured societies.
      That really does not make theology anything other than arguments about what to believe.

    22. Re:For those of us by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The study of religion (theology) is actually something quite recent. After all, even today you run the risk of execution for questioning religion in certain religious societies. They practice their religion, not theology.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    23. Re:For those of us by mixed_signal · · Score: 1

      It's even easier to disprove a scientific principle: One well thought out counter example will do it. (Well thought out meaning it doesn't have some misunderstanding or poorly constructed part making it incorrect.)

    24. Re:For those of us by mixed_signal · · Score: 1

      Yes. Humans are fallible. Hence, Science.

    25. Re:For those of us by mixed_signal · · Score: 1

      I remember as a kid (in the 1970s) playing with a globe noticing that South America would fit rather nicely into Africa. Some things are just kind of obvious on inspection. Perhaps many geologists noticed things like that and started looking for similar strata, etc. in locations that would have been nearby.

    26. Re:For those of us by youngone · · Score: 1

      Well, if by quite recent you mean a thousand years or so, you might be right (in the Christian context). After all the University of Bologna has been handing out theology degrees since about 1088.
      However, if I was a priest telling the villagers that thy needed to give me some of their harvest and pray to this statue over here to ensure another one next year, then I had better have a pretty good justification for it.
      I imagine that's a possible basis for theology.

    27. Re:For those of us by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      You're the one that blurted out your ignorance like it was some point of pride.

      Suck it up, buttercup.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    28. Re:For those of us by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The University of Bologna has been handing out law degrees since that time. While its founding was for studying Roman law, it is debatable when the study of canon was introduced and if it met the definition of theology.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    29. Re:For those of us by careysub · · Score: 2

      The speculation that continents might have 'drifted' was first put forward by Abraham Ortelius in 1596. The concept was independently and more fully developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912

      You should have a lower user ID if you're that old.

      Kids daydreaming in school and looking at the world map hanging on the wall will on occasion notice that the margins of Eurasia-Africa fit into the Americas. Ortelius gets the credit for making this observation because it was incidental to the main reason history remembers him - he was the leading cartographer and atlas publisher of his age. He had in this hands the first good set of maps of the margins of the two continent systems anyone had ever prepared, so he was the first to be able to notice this readily apparent fact.

      Wegener's contribution was on another level entirely. He studied the geology and fossils along the margins of both continental systems and showed the same geology and fossil species are found along the margin of the divide from one end to the other. And plainly species distributions look nothing like that at any recent time (recent here means the last 150 million years). Wegener also identified the strata, and thus time were the similarities end and divergence begins.

      He did not have theory about how it moved, which was what kept the idea from being take seriously. But the evidence for the fact that they were joined 175 million years ago that Wegener compiled is overwhelming. Even without a plausible explanation for how they managed to move apart the fact that did had such an astonishing body of evidence supporting it geology should have accepted that fact as it stood, and start thinking about how to uncover a mechanism by which it occurred, and developing theories to test through field research. As it was sea floor spreading was discovered serendipitously, through anomalies in other more general oceanographic studies.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    30. Re:For those of us by careysub · · Score: 1

      Yep, that is exactly what happened. People were constantly noticing this plainly evident margin alignment. Wegener reasoned that if the two continent systems once were joined, then the geology and fossils on either side the split at the time it occurred must be the same everywhere, not just here and there. Wegener showed that this was the case. If he had been able to show the opposite he would have decisively disproved the idea.

      Once he had convincing evidence that this was true geologists should have believed it, and then gone to work on thinking about how it happened.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    31. Re:For those of us by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      How did that come across as a "point of pride", tough guy? Maybe the word you're looking for is honesty.. What a concept.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    32. Re:For those of us by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's studying people's religious beliefs and their causes and consequences, and there's trying to figure out what one's own religion really means. The latter is usually called "theology", and it is not in general based on empirical observations. It's been around for a long, long time.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    33. Re:For those of us by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's hard to find convincing evidence for something that's considered impossible. Without some sort of idea as to how continents can drift, Wegener's work was interesting but not conclusive.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    34. Re:For those of us by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Well, like someone said, "'Tis best to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt".

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    35. Re:For those of us by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      OMG, stop the presses, I've never heard of supercontinent "Nuna" before, like 95% of the rest of the human population.. ..so that makes me a fool.
      It must be nice to be among the elite. If you admitted to something I knew that you didn't, I wouldn't be such a dickwad about it, but then I'm a decent human being.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  6. Oblig PBF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's how the continental drift *really* went: http://pbfcomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/PBF260-The_Drift.png

    1. Re:Oblig PBF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think pbf is popular enough to get an "oblig"

  7. Re: Glboal Warming by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Which book? I couldn't find any reference of this in the Bible.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. I claim this in the name of Canada... by grub · · Score: 1

    ... and propose drilling for oil by summer!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  9. Good deed by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    So in a way Great Britain joined long lost siblings under the Commonwealth? Isn't that nice of them?

  10. Fake News Ticker reports by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 3, Funny

    President Trump demands immediate return of American property. Unnamed private investor will be building a golf resort on it.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    1. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      If it aint got no oil we dont want it.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      It said parts of Canada, not the US. Good reading comprehension.
      Justin Trudeau apologized for the inconvenience to the Ozzies and offered to immigrate half of Australia's deadly snakes and spiders to British Colombia as an appeasement

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      On behalf of all Australians we encourage your unnamed investor to build his course and spend as much time playing there as possible. The only things up there are skin cancer, firebombing birds, crocodiles, and the worlds deadliest jellyfish. Think you're safe? Not even Steve Irwin survived up there.

    4. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Combine all golf courses in the U.S. and they equal the area of it's 4 smallest states. It's where old rich white guys go to talk about how to divide up the rest of the world. (Paraphrasing George Carlin)

    5. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even Steve Irwin survived up there.

      Of course not, it was SOOOOOOO DAYNGEROUS!

    6. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by Teun · · Score: 1

      Foreign oil when Trump just stopped import of cheap solar panels?
      No, Trump prefers to keep his USA First billionaire friends make money locally.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It said parts of Canada, not the US. Good reading comprehension.

      Human Nature Rule #73: good jokes override logic and accuracy. (So do some Presidents, but that's another rule.)

    8. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      President Trump demands immediate return of American property.

      Australian leadership replied that Trump can have it if he can haul the chunk away using wind power. At least that's how I'll interpret "blow chunks".

    9. Re:Fake News Ticker reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the poisonous toads and several of the world's deadliest snakes (rattlesnake? ptui - the Inland Taipan's venom is 1000 more effective).

  11. It needs to be said by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    Bad blood. It's thieves and criminals what were sent to Australia. So now they stole a piece of someone else's continent?

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  12. Re:Glboal Warming by Maritz · · Score: 0

    "The thing that I don't like believing in because I'm a pathetic intellectual coward - people keep saying that EVERYTHING ever is down to that thing!! They really do!! This makes it even more certain that it's a big LIE!!!"

    Nope, no-one is, and you're still a stupid cunt.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  13. Re: Glboal Warming by Maritz · · Score: 1

    It's just after the bit where stealing women and raping them is cleared as OK and just before the bit where the she-bears kill 40 kids for making fun of a bald guy.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  14. Learn' som'thin new.... by CyberRacer · · Score: 1

    Who knew the aborigines were canucks?

  15. Thiefs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give it back goddammit!

  16. Chunk of Canada stuck to your ass? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Go see a doctor.

  17. Re: Glboal Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really baldness or does Trump just have a bad hairpiece?

  18. At long last proof! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    I find myself deeply moved in my faith that God would go to all this trouble to mislead idiot atheists into believing the world is more than 6,000 years old.

    I must go at once to donate my children's college fund to Pat Robertson. You go, God!

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:At long last proof! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "athiest".

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    2. Re:At long last proof! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry. My mistkae.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  19. We're So Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the related news, Canada has announced the annexation of the piece of Australian continent. Australian youth prepares for extended conflict in the bush and their parents taken for unannounced purposes. It's the Red-White-Dawn. Where will you be tomorrow when the war began?

  20. Get our land back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Australia! We want our land back!

  21. Canada suing to get it back by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    They filled a international court motion to get their land back.

  22. The Proper Name by dcw3 · · Score: 2

    We call that the "sticky bit"

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  23. Re: Glboal Warming by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    It's just after the bit where stealing women and raping them is cleared as OK and just before the bit where the she-bears kill 40 kids for making fun of a bald guy.

    Well that was the *old testament* real wrath of god type stuff, so you should expect that. Then they got all cranky in Europe, had a reformation(s) and decided it wasn't so great anymore. But it hasn't got that far with Islam, just look at all those people who supported ISIS and whatnot, or tried arguing before the courts that raping women is allowed because their religion says so. Might only take another few hundred years before that's fixed, providing of course they don't change the "this is the true word of god, and questioning it is forbidden" and "changing it makes you an apostate and you need to be put to death" stuff first. Might be sooner, but probably not.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  24. Ob. Star Trek by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Has anyone made a klingon joke yet?

  25. #MAWA by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

    Make American Whole Again!

  26. Exotic Terranes by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    These exotic terranes, which are rock that originally were part of other continents, are a pretty common occurrence. Most of the eastern seaboard of the US was once part of Africa or South America. Large parts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachussets, New Hampshire, Maine Nova Scotia and Newfoundland contain African rocks. The contact between African and North American rocks runs through New York, Its called Cameron's Line. A large long piece of Africa called Avalonia broke off, drifted across the ocean and lodged on North America 400 million years ago. Florida and Louisiana was seperately added by the collisions that formed Pangea, it remained on the North American side when the split occured.

    1. Re:Exotic Terranes by Teun · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and most of Italy is still part of the African shelf.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  27. Re: Glboal Warming by Barsteward · · Score: 0

    The christians in trumps government seem to be intent on rolling back as many health reforms for women and removing equality for all because their religion says so to show that some christians still haven't entered the 20th century yet.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  28. Reunite Gondwana! by kybred · · Score: 1

    We want our rocks back!

  29. Natives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, don't tell Native Americans that. They'll be claiming it's theirs.

    1. Re:Natives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll have to fight the Australian Aboriginals for it.

  30. Pretty Sure Computer Graphics Weren't the Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My understanding is that Continental Drift failed to gain acceptance due to a lack of information on what would cause the continents to move. It was based upon surface observations that made sense of the topography but little else.

    When geologists understood the physics of the Earth's core and mantle, that provided the mechanism. It also explained volcanos, earthquakes, and large scale structures like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the Pacific Ring of Fire, and more.

    This got all bundled together into Plate Tectonics and voilà! A successful geophysical theory.

  31. Sorry mate.. we have it to the aborigines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry mate your shit out of luck, you can't have it back we gave it to the aborigines years ago..

  32. Koran repeats itself, predictably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK. I'll feed the troll.

    Look at the Koran, the cook book of Islam. Then look at what they have done throughout history, and continue to do today.

    That is EMINENTLY repeatable. Take any generation of Muslims. Allow them to read the Koran. An unhealthy number will
    take it to heart and actually try to emulate Mohammed.

    Now, for Christianity. I believe most people would find it most agreeable to emulate Jesus. You know, the guy who said
    to love your neighbour, treat others as you wish to be treated, bless those who curse you. That's why Christians have
    been doing a lot of praying lately. They see another encroachment on their lands, and this time it is so insidious as to
    be almost impossible to stop. How can you stop the MSMs brainwashing of the idiot masses who have never read
    enough history to see that yes, time and again, Muslims have adhered to their book of rules which green lights violence,
    rape, and genocide.

    signed,

    The Only Hope for Humanity.

  33. RE: darn hard to read.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when my background is from Korea, 'nuna' means older sister in Korean... and I have an older sister.

  34. Re: Glboal Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thou Shalt Not Kill.

    That's in the Bible, both "testaments".

    Trump doesn't want Christians to be forced to pay for infanticide. Compelling people to do evil
    was condemned in inter-testamental books as well.

    But the poster is correct, nowhere does the Bible give an age of the Earth. Some people have
    made a number of ASSUMPTIONS and tried to extrapolate the age to ~6,000 years. The
    Jewish calendar year is 5778; so it's not just some fringe Christians who tend towards the 6000
    year old thing.

    People hate the Bible because they think that an evil mind will buy their souls some rest.
    (apologies and credit to Triumph).

    I'm truly sorry for trying to interject some rational discourse and truth into Slashdot, a website
    that purports to be a refuge for smart...er..brainwashed people.

    I shall retire for the evening.

  35. Re: Glboal Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Islam had its reformation. It's called Wahbabism; you know, the RADICAL Saudis.

    Wikipedia:

    Wahhabism (Arabic: , al-Wahhbiya(h)) is an Islamic doctrine and religious movement founded by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.[1] It has been variously described as "ultraconservative",[2] "austere",[3] "fundamentalist",[4] or "puritan(ical)";....

  36. The ultimate merchandise return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Return or exchange any unworn, uneroded or defective merchandise by mail or at one of our US or Canada store locations. Returns made within 300 million years of the order shipment date will be issued a full refund to the original form of payment. Returns made after 300 million years of the order shipment date will be refunded via an emailed e-merchandise credit. Made to order items cannot be canceled, exchanged or returned. Get refunded faster with easy online returns and print a FREE pre-paid return label online! Customer must contact customer support to receive a Return Merchandise Authorization (RMA) number prior to return. Write the RMA number on the outside of the box the merchandise is being returned in. (Caution: we recently received an intrastellar merchandise return at our Michigan location that could not be honored as it lacked an RMA number.) See our Returns & Exchange options for details.

  37. Silliness. by NormanHaga2580 · · Score: 0

    Spray sulfur aerosols into the atmosphere?

    Acid rain destroyed many monuments and historic artifacts.

  38. Old Jest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The criminals were sent to Australia and the Religious fanatics sent to the U.S.

  39. Re: Glboal Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that was the *old testament* real wrath of god type stuff

    As opposed to the new testament which is some serious socialist hippie type stuff.

    Last will be first, first will be last

    Harder for the rich to get into heaven than camel through eye of needle

    Render undo Caesar that which is Caesar's

    Free booze and free health care on Jesus if you just believe (replace Jesus with government and you get socialism)

    It's cool boys if the tyrannical government wants to arrest me when I've done nothing wrong, I should just comply and let them kill me, not resist like a free man would.

    Then they got all cranky in Europe, had a reformation(s) and decided it wasn't so great anymore.

    Yeah, but the replacement was progressivism, socialism, communism, feminism, etc.

    But it hasn't got that far with Islam

    Maybe, but what would it take to further Islam without it repeating the same mistakes Christianity did? (as above, paving the road to all that Progressivism and socialism)

  40. Re: Glboal Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump doesn't want Christians to be forced to pay for infanticide.

    That's a violation of the first amendment. First amendment prohibits government from preventing OR helping any particular religion.

    There are other arguments to be made for or against abortion (or gay marriage, or any other hot topic), but religion ain't a valid one.

  41. Re: Glboal Warming by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    The christians in trumps government seem to be intent on rolling back as many health reforms for women and removing equality for all because their religion says so to show that some christians still haven't entered the 20th century yet.

    Repeating that meme doesn't make it true. Seems more like you're happier with the state/religion separation only working one way, where under those guaranteed rights businesses, charities, and so on also have protections. So do the people working for them, and in some cases people work for/volunteer for particular morals. Something that various left-wing progressive groups have been very happy to trample all over.

    Let me know when those gay couples go out of their way to target a christian bakery again, and ignore the muslim ones(who also wouldn't bake them a cake).

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  42. Re: Glboal Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeating that meme doesn't make it true.

    Except it isn't a meme, and it is true. Some Christians haven't entered the 20th century. There's hardly anything controversial about the statement. It's like how Trump said Mexicans bring drugs and crime and rape, but some he assumes are good people.

    Both Trump and GP's statements are politician speak, where they make a statement that is technically true, but doesn't really convey any meaningful information. It just gives the appearance that they did.

    Both Trump and GP could have just said "Mexicans/Christians exist". Yeah, no shit. That doesn't tell us anything useful. It's only useful in the sense of getting people to double down on their preconceived biases, interpreting the vague statements however they like.

    Let me know when those gay couples go out of their way to target a christian bakery again, and ignore the muslim ones(who also wouldn't bake them a cake).

    Dude, that's the left's argument to force that Christian bakery to bake a cake. The left is the one saying the bakery is "ignoring" and discriminating against gays when the bakery choose to not serve a gay couple.

    You said it yourself when it comes to church/state separation: it goes both ways. If you support bakeries having freedom to choose who they serve, gay couples also have the freedom to choose which bakeries they visit (or sue). They aren't obligated to visit and sue every bakery of every religion to fill some kinda quota. You complaining that they "ignore" Muslim bakeries is no different than feminists complaining that companies "ignore" women and minorities by not hiring enough of them to your liking.

  43. Re: Glboal Warming by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    "particular morals." - in the religious case its generally "peculiar morals" - picking and choosing according to their own form of bigotry. keep religion in your own head and out of every other place except a church then we'll have real equality.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  44. Re: Glboal Warming by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    If its too hot in the kitchen then they should get out instead of foisting their dodgy morals on others.
    God also command the total extermination / genocide of the Canaanites, women and children included etc etc so the bible is not a paragon of good words/deeds

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)