Slashdot Mirror


Fitbit Will End Support For Pebble Smartwatches In June (arstechnica.com)

Today, Fitbit announced that it will extend its support of the Pebble smartwatch ecosystem, including devices, software, and forums, until June 30, 2018. "During this time, we invite the Pebble community to explore how familiar highlights from the Pebble ecosystem are evolving on the Fitbit platform, from apps and clock faces to features and experiences," the company's blog post states. Ars Technica reports: Fitbit's invitation is a hopeful one for the company itself. After the buyout, members of the Pebble team helped Fitbit develop its own smartwatch OS that debuted on the $300 Fitbit Ionic last year. Fitbit is likely hoping that diehard members of the Pebble community, many of which developed apps and programs for the smartwatch platform, will try making similar programs for Fitbit's new wearable operating system. The Fitbit SDK is already quite accessible, allowing developers to sign up and start building programs using all-online tools. But in addition to the accessibility of the SDK, Fitbit wants to entice Pebble users with a discount: users with a valid Pebble device serial number can get $50 off a Fitbit Ionic smartwatch. It's currently the only device that runs Fitbit OS, and it's useful to have if you want to test out any apps made with the SDK. But for those who want nothing to do with Fitbit OS development and only care about how long their Pebbles will last, this news is bittersweet. According to Fitbit's announcement, Pebble devices will continue to work after June 30, but these features will stop working: the Pebble app store, the Pebble forum, voice recognition features, SMS and email replies, timeline pins from third-party apps (although calendar pins will still function), and the CloudPebble development tool.

93 comments

  1. Re:Right around when America gets rid of Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Wish him luck with that. They don't let people "this, that" in prison.

  2. SMS/Email will work for Android still by bongey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just wanted to point out SMS and Email will still work on android, only IOS will stop working. Voice recognition will die for all platforms.

    Kinda stupid in that fitbit could have made a simple subscription model and generate a steady revenue without much effort , instead they are killing pebble.

    1. Re:SMS/Email will work for Android still by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Funny

      They do have a subscription model. It's called "buy a new Fitbit every year". It's about $25/month.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:SMS/Email will work for Android still by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Kinda stupid in that fitbit could have made a simple subscription model and generate a steady revenue without much effort , instead they are killing pebble.

      Have you built an end-end device subscription service, and if so, was it "without much effort"?

  3. Nope - Former Pebble Owner by WoodburyMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had the original Pebble watch from Kickstarter, and Pebble Time Steel from Kickstarter. My favorite watches. I had the Pebble Time Steel 2 on Pre-order on Kickstarter when it was canceled. I will absolutely NEVER buy a Fitbit product again due to the way they ripped apart Pebble.

    Understandably, Pebble was in trouble and was going bankrupt. Legally Fitbit had every right to do what they did, and maximize profits. However the way they bought only Pebble's IP, and hired on it's Developers, not taking on the company itself, was just a dick move. People who bought a BRAND NEW Pebble 2, Pebble Round, or any other pebble the DAY before the announcement LOST their warranty and ALL SUPPORT, despite Fitbit making it seem like they took over the company. I for one had my vibration motor for notifications die just a few days after the announcement, despite being under 1 year old, I was stuck. Likewise Pebble had all the leg work done for the Pebble Time Steel 2 watch, that IS the Fitbit Ionic in 95% of the features, including Tooling, design, software.. they could have just released it. Pebble was also HUGE and had inlays into retail and big online stores. Fitbit could have EASILY utilized the branding and name.. but chose the cheap way out. I feel like another company could have easily come in and actually done right and kept the brand going. Instead they let themselves be cannibalized by Fitbit.

    1. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by wwphx · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that the app store couldn't be released or opened up so people could continue to develop and load apps, unless there's such a method that I'm unaware of. I guess I'm good until my Time Steel needs a reset and then I'll be unable to reload what I need on it and I'll be done with it, which really sucks. I was thinking about buying another Pebble when the company went bust, but then I lost my job and it lost its priority, and now it's kinda too late.

      I'd be willing to pay towards supporting a store via Patreon or something just to keep it going, but I doubt it'll happen. Probably too much IP entanglement.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    2. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2

      https://rebble.io/

      Not yet a fully functioning replacement for the PebbleOS, but it's a project that at least has some legs.

    3. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 Embrace
      20 Extend
      30 Extinguish
      40 goto 10

    4. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      I own a Pebble Time Steel and I love the device. An always-on display and several days worth of charge are requirements and none of the Android watches provide that. iWatches only work with iPhones, so they aren't an option.

      I looked at the FitBit devices and they're all garbage for my purposes. I don't want a fitness tracker, I want a smartwatch! I find it ironic that FitBit kept the Pebble developers since each update to my Pebble seemed to break something important. The fitness tracking features that were added just don't work properly. Sometimes my sleep data is wildly inaccurate, hours of sleep not counted, and there's no way to correct the information. According to the step counter I'm burning more than 4,000 calories a day!

      I just don't understand why Pebble continued creating all of those new devices if they were having financial problems. The Pebble Round I can understand, but why was money spent developing the Time 2 and Core? The cherry on top was Pebble's CEO holding out for less money; he turned down $740 million from Citizen and instead took $35 million from FitBit. WTF?! Did he go to the George Costanza school of business?

      The chances of me buying a FitBit product are 0%.

    5. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by eepok · · Score: 1

      I followed Pebble pretty closely because they had a loyal app developer base and a major focus on battery life. I never did buy one though.

      When the Pebble 2 and Core were announced, I just right on Kickstarter and pledged. The Core itself was an absolutely brilliant idea. It allowed you to get that cellular communication *when you wanted it* in a smaller package than a phone AND it didn't force the watch to become obnoxiously bulky. This was the holy grail solution for runners.

      And then came the Fitbit announcement and refunds. And the sadness.

      I had hoped that Fitbit would have adopted the Core idea at least, but I've seen nothing come if it. I still haven't purchased a smartwatch.

    6. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by phorm · · Score: 1

      Ditto here. Not to mention that the Ionic is a *joke* compared to what Pebble was releasing. Yeah, the early Pebble watches were plasticy, but the Time Steel 2 (which I was also on the kickstarter for) was a nice looking watch and would have had a color screen and approx a week of battery-life. There is *still* no watch that compares.
      I've had a Huawei Fit (the B&W model) which was comparable in battery life but very lacking in features, and gone through various "Android Wear" watches which all have fairly shyte and not-to-mention inconsistent battery life.

      Is it really too much to ask for a watch that looks nice, has decent features (message notifications from all apps, calendar, music control, faces, color), and lasts more than a day or two on battery?

    7. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      However the way they bought only Pebble's IP, and hired on it's Developers, not taking on the company itself, was just a dick move.

      Maybe you should look at Pebble for the dick (or maybe just dumb) moves.

      I feel like another company could have easily come in and actually done right and kept the brand going. Instead they let themselves be cannibalized by Fitbit.

      They sure could have. We've since learned that they had buyout offers from Tag Heur, Intel (for $70m), and Citizen (for $740m). But the chose to grind the company into the dirt and sell for $40m. Fitbit was the only one that was offering at the end.

      Pebble was also HUGE and had inlays into retail and big online stores. Fitbit could have EASILY utilized the branding and name.. but chose the cheap way out.

      I am positive that Fitbit analyzed their business opportunities and made the choice which would net them the most profit (which is all that can be expected). Pebble closed it's doors for a reason. It wasn't profitable and is never going to compete against companies like Apple and Samsung. Fitbit on the other hand is a niche player specializing in activity monitoring / health devices. They have no interest in attempting to compete with a general purpose smartwatch.

    8. Re:Nope - Former Pebble Owner by wwphx · · Score: 1

      About half an hour after my post I was reading Ars Technica and I learned of the Rebble project. I hope they succeed! I wonder what they'll have in terms of an app store, and I hope my watch survives long enough!

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    9. Re: Nope - Former Pebble Owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garmin fenix 3 or 5? Always on display, 1wk charge + apps. Notifications etc.

  4. Android Watches and such. by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 0

    why can these devices not operate like any other Android Product and allow the install of F-Droid like Apps that allow for support for CarDav/CardDav/etc. Or whatever resource they connect to with some other privately owned device/server not controlled by FitBit?

    1. Re:Android Watches and such. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      why can these devices not operate like any other Android Product and allow the install of F-Droid like Apps that allow for support for CarDav/CardDav/etc. Or whatever resource they connect to with some other privately owned device/server not controlled by FitBit?

      Because they're not Android products, dumbass.

    2. Re:Android Watches and such. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or whatever resource they connect to with some other privately owned device/server not controlled by FitBit?

      In other words, why won't Fitbit let users install apps that let the watch connect to servers not controlled by Fitbit? I think the reason is Fitbit would lose control over the device.

  5. Cacelling the Pebble... by pots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They're cancelling the Pebble to try and get people to buy the Ionic. The Pebble cost $150, the Ionic costs $300. The Pebble had a 7-day battery life, the Ionic has a 4-day battery... So what does the Ionic actually do better? Well, it looks like it has a color screen. Also, it has a pedometer and it's spying on you.

    I can see how it's worth the extra money.

    1. Re:Cacelling the Pebble... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, they can't even spell Ironic...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:Cacelling the Pebble... by vivian · · Score: 1

      My watch has a 6 month battery life - if I leave it in a drawer. it's solar powered though so if I wear it normally, it never needs a battery change or manual intervention at all.
      Tells the time great, does the usual stopwatch stuff and looks good on my wrist too.
      I just don't get why you'd want to have all the hassle of having to recharge a watch all the time, for the sake of a few extra functions your phone already does much better than the small watch form factor ever can.

    3. Re: Cacelling the Pebble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you can't imagine doesn't mean valid reasons don't exist, of course.

      I had a Pebble when I was a classroom teacher and my wife was due to have my first child. I'm obviously conducting lectures, working with students, proctoring tests, and so forth throughout the day. If my wife went into labor, I wanted to know so I could haul ass to the hospital. The Pebble had one of the best vibrating motors in a smartwatch I've ever had; I could easily feel when it would vibrate. A quick glance down at my wrist would tell new if that was "the call", and my students weren't interrupted, and I could keep talking about volumes of revolution without breaking stride. A phone couldn't easily do that at all.

    4. Re: Cacelling the Pebble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My pebble:
      -Vibrates my wrist for select notifications and phone calls. I don't wear skinny jeans like a hipster, so my phone is loose in my pocket where I may not feel it vibrate, or hear it if there's ambient noise eg public transport, or forget to turn it off silent.
      -lights up when I flick my wrist, not only convenient for telling time in the dark but also acts as a decent night light.
      -lets me see notifications and callers without taking my phone out of my pocket. Yeah, it's only a second or two, but it adds up, and there are plenty of times where it's inconvenient (eg. hands full) or I'm temporarily away from my phone (eg. it's plugged in charging a fee meters away)
      -lets me set my own silent alarm so I don't wake up my gf
      -shows me time, date and weather on the watch face, correct according to the current location/time zone because it's sourced from the paired phone
      -has a customizable watch face
      -acts as a basic remote for phone music, kodi, smart TV, and other smart home devices

      Maybe the problem is not the lack of usefulness of smart watches, but your lack of imagination.

    5. Re:Cacelling the Pebble... by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 2

      How do you change your watch display to show two time zones at once? Or show Donkey Kong and have him do an animation when you flick your wrist? Can you control your music player with your watch? Can you play Tiny Bird while sitting on the toilet? Can you roll six d20's on your watch?

      I have a watch with a mechanical movement, it will run pretty much forever without needing to be taken off and charged. It's been sitting in my watch winder since I've owned by Pebble Time Steel. My Pebble does need to be charged once a week, but it only takes an hour and I do it while I'm working at my desk.

      Being able to use my watch to perform certain functions is vastly superior to pulling a phone out of my pocket, entering my passphrase and then going into an app to do something. If I get a call or a text message I just have to look at my wrist. I can respond by pushing a few buttons or talking at it. I know it seems really simple, but it's a huge improvement as far as usability goes.

  6. Cute by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now why the hell should I buy anything from you if it's just going to be discontinued?

    1. Re:Cute by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the #1 reason why I won't consider any Apple products.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

    3. Re:Cute by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's a pretty ridiculous statement. Apple, for all its faults, supports its products way longer than just about any other hardware maker you can buy from. There's a lot to criticism Apple for, but this ain't one of them. (Disclosure: Owner of a Series 0 Apple Watch that just got a software update yesterday and can count on continuing to get them for years to come).

    4. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple is also the OS provider. Older devices, including 1st generation Mac Pro are no longer supported at the OS level unlike with MS, where Windows 10 will run on Core2 Duo processors. Apple support really is bad if you compare to MS.

    5. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, though, that you can update the firmware on your Mac manually so it appears to be newer hardware, and suddenly the newer MacOS versions install just fine. Why would the artifically constrain older hardware so it can't run newer OS?

    6. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tell that to any old imac buddy. i had to dig through an entire room looking for a 10.6 DL-DVD in order to fix up a 7,1 or somesuch.

      Then you can look at oh, ipads and phones. Releases just stop at a certain point.

      Apple = forced upgrades for the artificial life of the product, getting people addicted and then they are cut loose and helpless. Thats how they reward loyalty. Time to buy the next model.

      And dont even get me started on their 90 day (1 year if your lucky) warranties!

    7. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're complaining about a 12 year old computer not being supported anymore.

    8. Re: Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 will run on a Pentium 3 if you really want to. As long as it's 1ghz+ with 1gb+ ram.

    9. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7,1 is a mid-2007 model that supports 10.5 through 10.11.

      You could've downloaded 10.9-10.11 for free and created USB install media. Whether or not that would have been more or less time depends on the tidiness in your digging room. :)

    10. Re:Cute by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I got an iPhone and a Nexus tablet at the same time (years ago). The Nexus stopped getting updates years ago. The iPhone just got a new version.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    11. Re:Cute by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Are you one of those who also complain about newer releases slowing down older hardware, or are you at least a tiny bit consistent?

    12. Re: Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the competition permits (aka does not actively screw you over) their OS twenty years later, e.g. AMD Slot A Athlon 64 bit still can run windows, then yeah, 12 is worse than 20.

    13. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Nexus tablet will also receive third party updates from Lineage OS into the foreseeable future regardless of what Google does. Your iPhone will still stop getting updates, just a few years later.

    14. Re: Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be largely unusable ... but interesting experiment ... if you have no life.

    15. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the #1 reason why I won't consider any Apple products.

      Yah that’s why I don’t buy cars too, because they’re always being discontinued.

    16. Re: Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's wrong, Windows 7 will run on that not 10 ; 10 will run on e.g. first gen Atom.

      now, that's just a fucking computer. If you don't even know how to use a Windows PC, bugger off. Go cry to mommy that you only have one core.. sigh.

    17. Re:Cute by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Pity you can't pair an Apple Watch with any non-Apple phone.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    18. Re:Cute by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Correct. Though they still run Linux just fine.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  7. Ah, Fitbit by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah, Fitbit. The company that couldn't even get face rotation for the appropriate wrist done correctly.

    No thank you. I'd rather not deal with outright incompetents.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Ah, Fitbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What kind of stupid problem is that? How did those people manage to live with mechanical watches without their precious "face rotation"?

    2. Re:Ah, Fitbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Fitbit. The company that couldn't even get face rotation for the appropriate wrist done correctly.

      Couldn't? Sounds more like a deliberate decision not to. As Apple might say, they're just wearing it wrong.

      Joking aside, I am having a hard time understanding why someone cannot just rotate the physical watch. Why do they have to wear it with the button on the wrist side?

    3. Re:Ah, Fitbit by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Joking aside, I am having a hard time understanding why someone cannot just rotate the physical watch. Why do they have to wear it with the button on the wrist side?

      Well, since you couldn't be bothered to read the link I provided, here's a for-instance:

      It drives me nuts because this is such a simple little bit of coding, but neglecting it is **ahem**ing for full- and part-time lefties, and people with motor control difficulties.

      I periodically get gangliom cysts in my left wrist (I guess I use my left arm and shoulder more for strength-based things, so there's more strain). This makes wearing the fitbit on the left excruciating (plus it wont exactly fit under/over a brace), and I simply cannot (painlessly) move my wrist to hit the stupid freaking button when it's on the left side of my right wrist.

      There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
      Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  8. No ePaper display by ukoda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as I can tell the Pebble remains the only smart watch with an ePaper display and therefore is always on. The Ionic appears to have a not always on LCD, a fact they don't mention on the product page, so could not match the operation of a Pebble. Ironic might be a better name for it? Smartwatches are not very smart in my option if you have to interact with them to tell the time! A $5 dumb watch is more use for telling the time than any smartwatch if you have to touch the screen, shake your wrist or push a button.

    Until someone can make a slim smartwatch that is on all the time and runs several days on a charge I'm sticking with my Pebble regardless of the software support.

    1. Re: No ePaper display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asus vivo watch has an always on display and lasts a week on a charge.
      It's only semi smart though.

    2. Re:No ePaper display by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The display of an LCD is extremely power-thrifty. The old digital watches (with LCD displays) could run for over the year on a single button cell battery. That corresponds to a power draw of about 0.01 mW.

      It's the backlight which consumes huge amounts of power, not the LCD itself.

      That's not to dismiss ePaper - it doesn't need to be refreshed. It only consumes power when you're changing the image. LCDs need to be refreshed to maintain an image, and when you have pixels arranged in a grid the rows need to be addressed in sequence, which is going to take more power than more limited LCDs like an old digital watch display. But likewise if you're using ePaper to display a clock face, then it too is going to have be refreshed (either once a second or once a minute).

    3. Re:No ePaper display by ukoda · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, I am well versed in LCD technology. The active colour LCDs use more power than the simple black and white LCDs but you are right, it is the backlight that uses the most power. I don't display seconds by default but could flip over to another watch face if I really needed that. My Pebble runs about a week on a charge and is always ready read. No colour LCD can match that.

      My key point is smartwatches are a convenient display alternative to my phone screen but I do not play games or movies or anything else that need 60Hz refresh so ePaper is perfect as it is on 100% of the time. LCDs are the fatal flaw (IMHO) with every other smartwatch.

    4. Re:No ePaper display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazefit Pace function long time on charge. Fitbit sucky sucky.

    5. Re:No ePaper display by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Sony make an ePaper smart watch. The whole band is covered in ePaper in fact, as well as the face. It's kinda expensive, but I probably didn't need to say that given that it's a Sony.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:No ePaper display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garmin watches are not slim, but they are always-on, and some have multi-week battery life in addition to standalone GPS features. They don't have all the fancy features like voice recognition, but they do have notifications and apps. I rather prefer their "semi-connected" nature. I can actually use the watch without the phone and it's not a useless hunk of metal.

    7. Re:No ePaper display by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      LCDs are the fatal flaw (IMHO) with every other smartwatch.

      If you spend a few minutes searching you'll find there's a half-dozen other watches out there that use an ePaper or eInk display. Check out the Sony FES for example. Unfortunately none of them match the feature set of the Pebble Time.

  9. Re:Right when America gets rid of Traitor Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAAAH, Clinton and Obama are going to be golfing every day while Trump rots in Leavenworth! Oh the revenge is so perfect. "I'm best at going to Prison, if there's 2 things I'm known for it's going to prison and being a TRAITOR"

  10. why now? by AndyKron · · Score: 0

    Those sonofabitches. Now what the fuck am I going to do? I never bought a Pebble and now they're discontinuing support for it! That reminds me: I'd better change the dead battery in my watch before it leaks.

  11. Is fitbit management insane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would any Pebble fan want anything to do with the company that bought and killed Pebble just because they didn't want the competition?

    Any Pebble fan who ever spends one cent on a fitbit product is a complete idiot.

    1. Re:Is fitbit management insane? by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      On December 7, 2016, Pebble officially announced that the company would be shut down and would no longer manufacture or continue support for any devices, nor honor any existing warranties.

    2. Re:Is fitbit management insane? by DaTrueDave · · Score: 1

      On December 7, 2016, Pebble officially announced that the company would be shut down and would no longer manufacture or continue support for any devices, nor honor any existing warranties.

      That was when FitBit bought Pebble and killed it.

  12. So the online stuff goes away... by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...but my Pebble will continue to do what I need. Showing golf yardages, showing speed and distance while I'm biking, showing caller ID and MP3 names. Basically it is just a remote display for my phone. It does not need any online services to do this.

    I'm sad to see Fitbit kill Pebble, but the simplicity of the original is what made it what it was. Trying to make it "smarter" did not necessarily make it better. Just another in a huge field.

  13. Fitbit can DIAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Love my Pebble Time Steel. Who else offers a week of realistic battery life and all the features you'd expect in a smartwatch? Yeah. Go fuck yourself Fitbit.

  14. And in other news... by chaoskitty · · Score: 2

    Casio and Timex will be ending support for timekeeping for all watches made before 2016. Currently owners will get a discount on the new 2018 models with subscription-based timekeeping.

  15. Dilation by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    Actually, older models will continue to work, in a dilated time setting where everything runs slower and slower and slower and....

  16. Re:Right when America gets rid of Traitor Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad, the lack of sleep can't help him, 12 diet cokes a day? Absolutely batshit.

  17. Hear that flushing sound? by Chas · · Score: 1

    That's Fitbit rendering your $150-300 smart watch a useless piece of electronic junk.

    Shoulda bought a Timex mechanical. Woulda lasted longer.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Hear that flushing sound? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Only if you are using the watch just to show you the time. Which is kind of redundant because everyone and their dog have mobile phones nowadays.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:Hear that flushing sound? by Arab · · Score: 1

      ... because everyone and their dog have mobile phones nowadays.

      My dog has two mobile phones you insensitive clod. On a side note, remember the story of the "Chinese billionaire who bought two Apple Watch Editions for his dog. http://uk.businessinsider.com/...

    3. Re:Hear that flushing sound? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      While I am indeed an insensitive clod, I have never specified the amount of mobile phones everyone and their dog have.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  18. cause of death impacts carcass disposal by epine · · Score: 2

    Some previous discussion: Without their needed displays Pebble was doomed — December 2016

    The thesis in this thread was that Pebble fell victim to a single-sourced display technology, which was contested a few posts later. But supply issues can be complex, and available replacements unsuited in form factor, process, or price.

    If it really was death by supply chain, that explains a lot about Fitbit consuming the carcass rather than resuming the company.

    Pebble Teardown — March 2013

    At this point, the display is a Sharp Microelectronics memory LCD.

    Did some critical vendor actually go tits up?

    In any case, my old Pebble is still on my wrist, functioning as a vibrating pill timer and I'm not presently in the market for something less open, but with more bling.

    1. Re:cause of death impacts carcass disposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pebble used Sharp memory LCDs for black-and-white screens, Japan Display for color.

      JDI had some financial difficulties https://9to5mac.com/2016/12/21/japan-display-apple-supplier-iphone-displays-oled/ around that time although I don't know if that was related to Pebble's final downturn. Could have been a contributing factor but probably not the main one.

  19. Don't go pebble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My pebble time steel is probably my favorite smart watch. I've had Android wear devices, but touch screens and gestures on a watch and just fidley and just don't work. The battery life on an android wear just isn't there.

    The mistake that android wear has made is that is fails to work as a watch first.

    Pebble time steel works as a watch, I can look at it at a glance and see the time. Android wear devices I've used need a press of the button or a flick to operate. I get a good 7 day battery life, sometimes more.

    I can control my music, I can view messages I get at work without looking at my phone. Even reply to them. The application ecosystem and customizable watchfaces was just brilliance.

    Its a sad move the way fitbit has killed the brand. There isn't really anything in the smartwatch space to compete with what pebble created.

    Why hasn't someone come up with an e-paper watch to pick up where they left off?

    1. Re:Don't go pebble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read up on the Amazefit Pace

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V51CZiiysms

    2. Re:Don't go pebble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That name sucks. The only people who would name their products "AMAZE-FIT" are dumb asses and don't deserve our money.

    3. Re:Don't go pebble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much all tech companies give their stuff stupid names. "Macintosh" , "Echo", "Pixel" to name but a few. Even the name "Pebble" is kind of dumb.

  20. This. And there's more out there than Timex. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    I have a bunch of mechanical watches. They last and last and last. I just finished servicing a '70s vintage Slava 2427. Two mainsprings, built coarsely and roughly and like a tank. Keeps on ticking, and keeps reasonably good time.

    Good, high-quality mechanicals from the likes of Seiko and Orient are readily available on Amazon, eBay, or a bunch of other places for $100-$150. They don't need a battery, will run for 20 years without any attention, and when they do need attention, oils and parts to service them are out there by the millions. You can leave them to your kids.

    And for the hacking crowd, you can also build your own—cases, dials, hands, and movements are plentiful. If you want to go the new, Japanese route, Miyota (citizen) automatic mechanical movements are running about $35 right now from Hong Kong. Cases with sapphire crystals something like $40-60. A hefty solid stainless steel bracelet will only set you back $10 or so these days, and the same with a set of hands. You build your own gaming PC to look just the way you want it? Why not build your own mechanical watch.

    Selecting your own dial, hands, case, bracelet, and movement and assembling them yourself is a hell of a lot more personal than choosing a face from a watch app store... that goes dark every day without an overnight charge.

    Just IMO.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re: This. And there's more out there than Timex. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does your mechanical watch adjust itself for daylight savings? Or changing timezone? Or show the date? Or the weather? Or vibrate when you get a message? Oh, it doesn't do any of that? Wow, it's so different, it's almost like it's am entirely different type of product and not at all a sufficient replacement.

    2. Re: This. And there's more out there than Timex. by Chas · · Score: 1

      1: Manually.
      2: Manually
      3: Who cares, it's a WATCH, not a BAROMETER.
      4: Who cares. It's a WATCH, not a smartphone.
      5: No it doesn't. Know what else it doesn't do? Become expensive, useless junk after 5 years when the company ceases support.
      6: Know what else it CAN do? BE SERVICED pretty much FOREVER, by any competent watchmaker.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  21. They didn't discontinue it by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Fitbit didn't buy Pebble, they only bought the IP. Your Pebble products were discontinued because Pebble went bankrupt. Nothing to do with Fitbit.

    Fitbit is keeping Pebble's ecosystem going until mid-2018 despite having no obligation to do so. If Fitbit (or anyone else) hadn't bought Pebble's IP, you would've lost support and the ecosystem when Pebble shut down in Dec 2016. If people persist in blaming Fitbit for "killing" Pebble, next time a popular company goes bankrupt the buyer will probably just buy the IP and let the old product lines die then and there just to avoid the negative stigma from misinformed customers.

    If you want to blame someone for the fiasco, blame Pebble's management who let the situation become so bad before seeking buyers, that the company had accrued so much debt that nobody wanted to buy the company outright (debt > assets) and keep the product lines going..

    1. Re:They didn't discontinue it by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      There's some truth to what you say... but the truth from my perspective as an original Pebble backer and Pebble Time Steel backer (which is still my "daily driver") what Fitbit did wrong with the whole thing is ignoring the pretty much captive market they already had. Instead of buying up the product itself they ignore what is still the best smartwatch on the market today for many people's needs. It does exactly what it needs to do and no more, and has a battery that lasts a week (and takes maybe an hour to charge, at that). It's a much more focused and polished product than even the Apple watch that seems to be constantly trying to be another iPhone but in a wrist form factor. Pebble knew exactly what they needed for a good product; notifications, long battery life and good looks.

      And see there's the rub for me. The Pebble hardware is gone and that's a shame. My Pebble Time Steel is a damned good looking watch and I can customize it with whatever watch band I like. Fitbit replaced it with the Ionic... which is twice the price and somehow made of some of the cheapest and ugliest plastic I think I've ever seen in my life. It's horrific, uncomfortable and just downright bad. Fitbit seriously have replaced my PTS with... nothing I would buy. I know I'm not alone here and will keep my current hardware going as long as humanly possible. After that, who knows? Maybe the software on the Zetime will have reached a better level of maturity... or maybe I'll find something more to my taste in the admittedly expensive but much better looking Garmin line.

  22. Re:shitbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Pebble app store, the Pebble forum...and the CloudPebble development tool.

    I can understand why those would stop working.

    voice recognition features, SMS and email replies, timeline pins from third-party apps (although calendar pins will still function)

    I have no idea why these need to stop working though. They should all be solely reliant upon the watch and your paired phone.

  23. Re:shitbit by Arab · · Score: 1

    I think the voice recognition they used connected to a Pebble hosted server to do the grunt work rather than doing it on device.

  24. Embrace Extend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copy Microsoft's best known business practice to maximize profits!

  25. Cheished heirlooms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I treat my 2 pebble watches like old friends (Classic & Classic2 w/heartmonitor) , and have long abandoned the hokey Pebble Timeline and fitnes features. It is what it is..I.e. a programmable timepiece and wrist notification platform. I have both of mine programmed as marine navitimers, and use them as shipboard timepieces. Robust enough for marine use. My only complaint really, other than the sealed back of the Clasic2, is the swapping of the compass for the heart monitor. Which while it seems to work,drains the fuck out of the battery. Nevermind the whole navitimer without a compass thingy lol.
    Anyways, with both of the pebble clasic units, on airplane mode and with a conservative watchface, the battery lasts 15-20 days. That's right...always on watchface and smartwatch apps with 20 day battery time lol. Toggle notifications on when needed.
    The question remains; will anyone step up and mirror the Pebble App Store or force fitbit to open source it? Speaking as a pebble developer, even though I put my watchfaces on github, a lot will be lost when that shuts down' seemngly.

  26. It's hard to feel sympathetic by swb · · Score: 1

    Smartphones have a shelf life of about 3 years before performance, battery life or lack of updates render them kind of obsolete. At this point in their history, smart watches seem even more obsolescence prone.

    Until either environmental regulations or advanced state of development render electronics a useful lifespan more in line with their physical wear and tear lfiespan, buyer beware and just assume it will be obsolete and unusable in 3 years or much less.

    I avoid anything that relies on with "control with your phone" because I know it will end up abandoned by its maker.

  27. Answers: by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    It has a fully autonomous assistant that adjusts it twice a year for daylight savings.

    It has a GMT hand that can be set to alternate time zones.

    It has a little window that shows the current date.

    When it is rainy, it shows droplets of water on the crystal. When it is snowy, it shows snow on the crystal. When it's cold outside, it gets cold on your wrist.

    Thankfully, it never lets me know when I "get a message" and refuses to help other people interrupt my life.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  28. If they really want success... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...they should give up on their own products and start producing and selling Pebbles again.

    They own the technology for the best smartwatch yet produced, and still they push their own inferior products. I just don't get it.

  29. Totally agree. And the super cool thing by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    is that servicing them isn't nearly as hard as I'd always assumed. I've just picked it up in the last year. Anyone who builds their own PCs or can code should have no trouble, they're actually not all that complicated—just *small*.

    As it turns out, the key is the right tools. And these days, they're easy to get your hands on thanks to e-commerce. The guts of mechanical watches had always seemed intractable to me, but then I went out on a limb and bought an illuminated set of head-worn magnifying lenses. It only cost about $20. Suddenly, everything became clear and easy!

    A good set of brass tweezers (another $10, don't buy the junk for doing eyebrows at the drugstore), a good set of jeweler's screwdrivers (real ones, which go down to 0.2mm width flat blades) for another $20, a case-back tool for $3-4 to get them open... The most expensive things are the lubricating oils, but even then you're buying in small quantities (because you're literally using pinhead dabs) so again less than a $50 investment.

    It turns out parts are the easiest things to come by, there are sellers by the bucket on Etsy selling mechanical movements in untested condition, like 20 complete movements for $5-10 of for some common consumer models. They market them as "steampunk" decor for art projects, but they're just piles and piles of complete watch movements. You buy a bucket of 'em and you have parts coming out your ears.

    Then, you just follow your nose. And if you get stuck, there are YouTube teardown videos for just about every common movement. And there are dozens of timegrapher apps for smartphones now to help you to regulate them—start the app, put the mic by the open-back watch, and it will tell you how close you are to perfect time as you adjust the level. It's all actually shockingly easy, I think anyone with tech skills can pick it up in just a few months of practice.

    It's a lot like computers used to be in the '80s. A list of standard parts that are pretty recognizable (every moment has one of these, one of these, one of these, one of these...), specs that are easy to find for mix/match, and a basic set of not-all-that-special-or-expensive tools.

    In a world of more and more devices that are trying to be your "everything" device, and that are more and more locked down, unserviceable, and undocumented, with shorter and shorter times between charges, it's really refreshing to own and work on devices that are simple, straightforward, perform one job and perform it well, run on their own for decades, can be understood and maintained indefinitely, and that are amenable to at-home customizing, hacking, and optimization (regulating, cleaning, polishing, servicing, etc.)

    I've found in mechanical wristwatches the same fun that we used to be able to have with 8-bit computers in the '80s. Only better, because these don't need wall power, make great gifts, and can be left to future generations while still retaining much of their original functionality without any learning curve for the user.

    Plus, they look great. I still can't get over all these people walking around with little blank screens on their wrists. Better to have steel and chrome and paint and colors.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  30. Too late by itomato · · Score: 2

    If anything, we should be in a scenario where the inferior Fitbit products were dumped in favor of Pebble's.
    I want the equivalent of a Mac Plus on my wrist. It's enough.
    There are no less than 3 fully-capable compute devices at arm's length at all times. I need a timepiece and simple means to interact with those devices. That is all.