Slashdot Mirror


CNN Shutters Casey Neistat's Video Company Beme, Which It Bought 14 Months Ago For $25 Million (theverge.com)

In late November 2016, CNN purchased YouTube star Casey Neistat's video-sharing app Beme for $25 million. The news network purchased the app in a bid to harness Neistat's (at the time) 6 million subscribers, with the hopes of turning the company into an independently operated daily online news show and a core part of CNN's offerings that would appeal to a younger demographic. Today, CNN has shut down Beme because Neistat was unable to figure out a viable strategy due to creative differences and sluggish process. He will be departing from CNN. The Verge reports: "I couldn't find answers. I would sort of disappear, and I would hide, and I would make YouTube videos for my channel because at least I would be able to yield something," Neistat told Buzzfeed News. "I don't think I'm giving CNN what I want to give them, and I don't think they're getting value from me." When CNN bought Beme, it said Neistat's company would focus on "timely and topical video and empowering content creators to use technology to find their voice." Beme currently employs 22 people, and CNN said it would re-employ most of the team, though some would lose their jobs. CNN plans to continue developing tech products developed by Beme, including an unreleased live-news app called Wire.

38 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Suckers by Train0987 · · Score: 2

    That fool is laughing all the way to the bank. I can't stand the guy but kudos for rolling CNN.

    1. Re:Suckers by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.

      I have no clue who this guy is, never heard of him, but if he actually WANTED to make this work and simply couldn't it probably feels like a pretty bad defeat despite the money.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  2. Re:Lol by Train0987 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They gave him $25 million for nothing and he's -their- bitch?

  3. Surprising? Not really... by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 3, Informative

    I honestly can't say I'm surprised this is how it ended. In terms of content and audience CNN and Casey are so far apart I have a hard time understanding how anyone could think a synergy could be found. It probably was just some out of touch executive desperate to jumpstart an attempt at regaining the sub 30 market that broadcast news media has more or less completely lost.

    Then again when you are CNN and part of a big corporation like Turner Broadcasting it's not exactly the end of the world if you end up throwing 25 million USD down the drain.

    --
    "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    1. Re:Surprising? Not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus they probably lost a bunch of viewers when CNN inserted their bias.

    2. Re:Surprising? Not really... by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Until recently, I used CNN for world news -- they were biased but reliable. Then, somewhen during the US election campaign, they went completely bonkers. I don't know how to call them without being unfair to ordinary lying sacks of shit.

      This started with them not giving a single mention to Hillary's wrongdoings that were all over other news sites. Since then, they can't post a single article without propaganda stuffed with obvious lies -- especially if there's a word like "gun" or "nuclear" anywhere within six clicks of the piece. Fake News at its finest, indeed.

      While it's usually good to hear both sides, CNN has gone to Daily Stormer's level; going there is a waste of time.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re: Surprising? Not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think CNN is alone. Somewhere along the way everyone decided that polarized echo chambers are the way to more money. Everyone loses but the news organizations.

    4. Re:Surprising? Not really... by denzacar · · Score: 1, Interesting

      an attempt at regaining the sub 30 market that broadcast news media has more or less completely lost.

      Two words: Rachel Maddow.
      http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser...

      One of the most significant cable news ratings stories for Q2 '17 was the performance of The Rachel Maddow Show.
      Maddow finished this past quarter as the No. 1 show across all of cable news in the all-important A25-54 demographic.

      And it's not just the under-30 market. MSNBC took even younger audiences.

      MSNBC also set network records in the adults 18-49 demo during weekday prime (M-F 8-11 p.m.), finishing at No. 1 for the first time ever for a full quarter.
      While the achievement should be seen as a positive, the A18-49 demo is almost never cited by cable news advertisers.
      The A25-54 demo is the standard in this genre.
      A18-49 is the key demo for advertisers looking at broadcast and cable entertainment networks.

      Generations raised on Jon Stewart's Daily Show want charming, intelligent hosts, hosting factual, informative and insightful shows.
      They DO NOT WANT to feel like they are being click-baited to sit in front of the TV until that one particular bit of news they are interested in, and are continuously being promised is "coming up next", shows up in the "24-hour news cycle".
      They want to feel like they've either learned something or understood something after watching a news show.
      You know... Like how you already need to know about the things joked about on The Daily Show - in order to get the joke.

      It's not a coincidence that so many entertainment shows are copying the Daily Show's infotainment format.
      Some of them hosted by Daily Show alumni.
      Humans LOVE to "get" the joke. Or anything else. It's in our genes to get a dopamine kick out of that "Oh! I get it now!" moment.

      Alex Jones mines that same human need - only he, according to his talents, aims at the lowest common denominator audience.
      The usual mix of stupid, lazy, mentally deranged and racist. Some of those audiences may overlap.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    5. Re:Surprising? Not really... by gnick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since then, they can't post a single article without propaganda stuffed with obvious lies...

      They have a shit ton of articles up right now. Would you mind linking to one and pointing out these obvious lies that can't be missed?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    6. Re:Surprising? Not really... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Look at how many hits there are. Wow.

      > "They stopped being journalists and began being *cheerleaders*, and became people who had a conclusion that they reached, and then searched for facts to show that Hillary Clinton was an 92, 93, 99 point 9999 chance winner, of winning this campaign."

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2lWZ7CsXu0

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Surprising? Not really... by Boronx · · Score: 3

      CNN is garbage and has been for years, along with every other US news channel. CNN international was good as of a year or two ago, because it competes with real news organizations like the BBC. I don't know if it still is good, and I don't know why the US can't have decent domestic news. It's almost as if intelligent, hard-nosed reporters are blacklisted from TV.

    8. Re:Surprising? Not really... by gnick · · Score: 2

      Wow! Hits on Google! What was I thinking??? Obviously CNN is a sack of liars if Google returns results! I notice you don't link to one of their articles where they're purporting lies. I wonder why.

      Look at how many hits there are. Wow.

      Here's a much more useful link if you're trying to discredit CNN. You might have linked to something like this and tried to explain why swift, responsible, and aggressive handling of misreporting is the same as lying. They have a stellar track record of getting the facts straight or immediately correcting themselves and you've provided nothing to counter that. If you'd like to trade examples of CNN being inaccurate regarding DJT for examples of DJT being inaccurate about the world around him, I'm definitely game. If you'd like to trade examples of CNN doubling down on misinformation for examples of DJT doing the same, that sounds like fun too.

      I'm waiting to the link to their article full of lies. The assertion was that they never write an article that isn't full of "propaganda stuffed with obvious lies".

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    9. Re:Surprising? Not really... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you'll be waiting a long time for someone to make a concrete example that doesn't cherry pick from years of content.
      Sure it's possible there are afew biased stories out there, but most of their content is solid reporting.

    10. Re:Surprising? Not really... by gnick · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with somebody calling CNN biased. They're not FoxNews level biased, but of course there's a slant. But when somebody calls them liars, I'd like to see evidence. There just isn't any. Every time I ask I get no reasonable response, but some mixed reactions from the mod lords. For some people, the phrase "CNN is not FAKE NEWS" is really offensive even though they have no support for their position. Just because our president screams something over and over does not make it true. Our president regularly lies and I can back that up a helluva lot better than somebody accusing CNN of the same. If somebody takes DJT's word over CNN's, they need their head examined and I'd LOVE to see something to contradict that.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    11. Re:Surprising? Not really... by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      Let's look at the list of headlines I see front and center right now. No sign of bias here, nope none at all.

      Davos crowd boos when Trump slams free press

      Jeers heard as Trump calls media 'fake'

      Trump touts his 'America First' age.....

      wha.. the President of the United States is newsworthy? oh no.. such bias. They should be spending all their time talking about people who lost the election for POTUS. That would totally prove they have no bias.. yeah. totally.

      --
      Just another second banana
    12. Re:Surprising? Not really... by gnick · · Score: 1

      You do realize you shared the same link I did? Saying "CNN has corrected themselves more than once" is not remotely the same as saying CNN "can't post a single article without propaganda stuffed with obvious lies." Unrelated, calling them biased is importantly different than calling them liars. I wouldn't even call FoxNews liars even though they've got a few strikes and their bias turns my stomach. There are organizations that describe themselves as news outlets that I'd happily call liars, but CNN and FoxNews aren't among them.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    13. Re:Surprising? Not really... by gnick · · Score: 2

      Let's take a look at a couple of these. I have my own theory on why there are so many stories that put DJT in a bad light and bias has little to do with it.

      Davos crowd boos when Trump slams free press ... Jeers heard as Trump calls media 'fake'

      DJT says Stalin-esque stupid shit to the world. World responds appropriately.

      Trump touts his 'America First' agenda

      Well, yeah... That was his plan going in and exactly what he did. How would you like to see this reported?

      Anderson Cooper debunks FBI 'secret society' conspiracy theory

      The 'secret society' conspiracy theory is fucking stupid and debunking it is exactly the right thing to do. If you're in support of the 'secret society' theory, it doesn't make you biased. It makes you fucking stupid.

      Schumer didn't want WH aide in Trump chat

      How did this even make the list? How is this DJT bashing?

      Trump says he would apologize for retweeting far-right British group

      DJT should apologize for those tweets. Did you see them? Any way, reporting that he's apologizing seems like a pro-DJT story. Reporting ON those tweets comes across as very anti-DJT just as it should.

      I could go on, but we're already past the TL;DR limit. In any case, the assertion was that they couldn't post a single article that wasn't full of obvious lies. I'm waiting to the link to the article full of obvious lies. You can accurately allege bias in the headlines of literally every news agency.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    14. Re:Surprising? Not really... by gnick · · Score: 2

      Not that any amount of examples would ever sway you.

      One would do me. Just one. One link to their site with a story full of lies. Or an example where they made a mistake and doubled down on instead of correcting. Not that any amount of examples will ever be provided.

      Piss dossier

      Maybe you can give me a link to CNN's site where they say that DJT's water-sports tape is more than allegation?

      Claiming Soros did not work with the Nazis

      Despite politically-motivated rumors to the contrary, billionaire leftist George Soros was neither in the SS nor a Nazi collaborator in the Second World War.

      Claiming wiretapping of Trump tower never happened

      Obama never tappped DJT's phones. If you think he did, you're as deluded as him.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    15. Re:Surprising? Not really... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Everything has a slant, but not everything is a lie.
      It's a basic reality that's hard for some people to accept.

  4. Re:New for nerds...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Casey who?

  5. Casey Who ? by psergiu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is that the inventor of Netstat ?
    We tend to use "ss" now ... maybe that's why it failed.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  6. Re:Lol by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    I could have told them they weren't going to get anything good from him for half the price.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  7. That was an extinguish... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    without even an embrace or extend.

  8. CNN suffered from FOMO - Fear of Missing Out by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

    CNN saw Casey's 8.7 million youtube subscribers and thought buying him out was a sure way transfer a chunk of those eyeballs to CNN, provided he was the front-man for whatever media content they came up with. CNN was so sure of this strategy that they feared someone else would execute it first, which prompted them to not only buy Casey but also his entire Beme company, to bail it out of the hole it dug itself and its investors into from that failing first-person video app of theirs.

    Proof again that making hasty decisions based on FOMO rather than common sense are usually wrong and very expensive mistakes.

  9. Re:New for nerds...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Beme what?

  10. Large Media Company Does Stupid Thing - Film at 11 by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> (Large Media Company Buys Web Site For Too Much Money, Previous Owner Laughs To Bank, Then Site Shuts Down)

    What, you thought it was going to end with the MySpace buyout? Or Tumblr?

  11. Re:Large Media Company Does Stupid Thing - Film at by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    CNN was already mixed up with the king of these mistakes though. You'd think after getting financially sodomized buying AOL they would have learned.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  12. Probably just buying a potential competitor by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    to shut them down. Microsoft used to do it all the time. $25 million is a small price to pay to shut down upstart new media. Meanwhile Bernie Sanders had to go on youtube to get coverage for his Medicare For All townhall.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  13. Re:Lol by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I could have told them that for the same price they'd have to pay to watch one of those youtube videos.
    Probably cheaper cause it would be a very short assessment.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  14. Target market? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Is he part of the under-twenty....seven(?) age group? In my thirties I am feeling old, I have never heard of this guy. Whose eyeballs were CNN trying to buy? Americans age 17-28? English speaking europeans 25-40?
     
    6 million viewers is a lot but at the same time is a tiny tiny fraction of total users and there's a better chance you've never heard of the guy...

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  15. And nothing of value was lost... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Well, apart from those millions of dollars and a few jobs at... what was that again? Beme?
    Have they tried changing the name to Blockchaineme? Maybe that would help.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  16. Nothing new. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Mark Cuban is a billionare because of a project Yahoo bought and shuttered.

    How is AOL doing?

  17. CNN Shutters ... by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    I read "CNN Shutters ..." and was instantly ecstatic! Then I read the remainder of the headline. Maybe next time.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  18. Seen this before... by martinX · · Score: 1

    It's just like when Wayne Campbell sold out to television producer Benjamin Oliver. His show was never the same after that. Noah's Arcade sucks anyway.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  19. Thought of Gershwin when I saw this by trudyscousin · · Score: 1

    Nice work if you can get it.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  20. Re: What's the story? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    Irony is strong with this one.