Robert Mueller's Team Reportedly Interviewed Facebook Staff As Part of Russia Probe (thehill.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Hill: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has interviewed at least one Facebook employee tasked with helping the Trump campaign's digital operations during the 2016 campaign, Wired reported on Friday. The report, which cited a source familiar with the matter, does not say when the employee was questioned nor does it detail the focus of the interview. Mueller's team has been investigating for months any collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia. During the election, Facebook deployed employees to embed with the Trump campaign to assist its digital operations. The company also worked with Hillary Clinton's campaign team but did not have employees embedded with them. The company has also been scrutinized by Congress for selling more than 3,000 ads to the Internet Research Agency, a Russian "troll farm" alleged to have carried out misinformation operations online during the campaign.
Let the Pro/Anti Trump fights begin!
1. Show us the Internet Resch Agency ads and be more clear who authored them, FB, IRA or 3rd party.
2. The lack of interest in Hillary's collusion makes this probe seem disingenuous and partisan. Hillary definitely collected millions from Russia.
Trump won, get over it.
I have been thinking since this started that Mueller has the most phenomenal luck in catching this assignment. After running the FBI pretty much everything else he could do would be anticlimactic; a downhill slide to obscurity and retirement.
Instead, everyone in the entire world is breathlessly waiting for what he has got. What his real skills are. What effect he will have on the history of the civilized world.
Add to that there could not be a bigger, fatter, softer target that Donald J Trump and his hapless progeny and minions and cronies. These guys are up to their armpits in Russian mob money that's what has Jared, Junior, and fat old dad so worried. The collusion business is barely actionable, but they know that the trail leads to all the money laundering they have been doing for the past two decades.
I don't expect anyone named Trump to do any jail time. And certainly Trump is immune from the consequences of any action he took as long as Republicans control congress. But if Mueller has even 1/10th of what he is generally believed to have Trump is going to have a very miserable year.
unless the electorate turns on the Republican party. That's really what doomed Nixon. I don't see that happening. There's not a lot of difference between the Dems & the Rs right now (excluding Abortion & maybe Gay rights). There's a movement in the Democratic party to change that but so far they've been successfully shut out by the party leaders, even after the huge loss to Trump.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Man! it would so cool if you people would wait for real evidence before posting your tabloid bullshit! Ah! But the advertisers! (And the democrats) I forgot. Carry on then..
Hilary was run because she was popular with the billionaires who basically run things. Between Hilary and Trump they'd have taken either one, but they made damn sure we didn't get Bernie. Already I'm seeing stuff like top ten Democratic contenders lists without Bernie on them. The mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, etc) are doing their best to pretend he and the actual American Left don't exist.
Meanwhile the Republicans took both the House and Senate but lost the popular vote both times. And not by small margins. Dems took home 55% of the votes in the last round of elections to 45% on the Republican side and _still_ lost the House and Senate. You can't even blame that on Gerrymandering since the Rs took the Senate. And then there's Trump's victory despite losing the popular vote by 3%.
It's getting difficult to even pretend we live in a democracy anymore... I don't know what's worse, that these statistics exist or that our government doesn't even have to bother covering them up.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
ANGRY! VERY ANGRY AT MANCHURIAN ZUCK! not happy one bit. yes upset. well not so much. like the Zuck. Zuck is good. Feeling happy. Zuck is so sweet. LOVE THE ZUCK!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/06/28/facebook-manipulated-689003-users-emotions-for-science/ https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/29/facebook-users-emotions-news-feeds
Good god you're a fucking moron. ... "Deep State"... blah blah "Clinton Crime Family" blah blah.. Let me guess you watch Alex Jones and think he's a god, right? Or perhaps your a Rush Limbaugh fan?
Hillary has been investigated for decades by republicans and the end result is not one indictment. So, either the republicans investigating her were complete morons like yourself or they were complicit in hiding her supposed crimes.
Which is it you fucking dimwit?
Please don't breed we don't need your stupidity polluting the gene pool any longer.
Despite your attempt to make it partisan, it was a real attack on the USA. It started BEFORE Trump was picked for the nomination, so it was also an attack on the Republican party.
Do you think for a second Republicans want this whiny streak of loser in the Presidency? Their servers were attacked too, Putin's lot attacked them too. Trump attacks them too, undermines them too.
Or Republican supporters, do you imagine they want a Russian sell out? If you think that, perhaps you've forgotten Roy Moore and his "hello, how are you speech" to Putin in Russian. Shortly after dissing the USA and fluffing Putin. He managed to turn a safe Republican seat into a Democrat seat. They rejected him.
I see you're trying to define it as a narrow partisan thing, to avoid discussions of the wider attack from Russia on America.
If Trump won, then why is he not have power and why do the Republicans and wheels of government not follow him?
Because of this:
https://xkcd.com/1939/
They won't act against the majority of Americans interests no matter what that screaming piece of whiny shit and his Russian friends say.
They are only as loyal as the last payment you made.
Melania, President Trump's wife, was born in eastern europe.
Ivanka, President Trump's eldest daughter, was born in the United States (in New York)
Trump is not a Clinton or an Obama, so nobody is talking about his wife following him into the presidency as people have spoken of Hillary and of Michellle.
People HAVE spoken about his daughter Ivanka (as some have spoken of Clinton's daughter Chelsea) running for the office someday.
As a deeply patriotic American, I find all this dynastic talk rather repellant. We are not a monarchy with royal families, and we make a point of it with a 200 year old tradition that while we are happy that other societies have royals and we can treat them civillay as representatives of their nations, we do not bow to royals (which is why many of us were angered to see Obama do it). With 300Million+ people, it is insane to assert that we can only find leaders within a couple of elite families (and, yes, I was pretty annoyed when the Bushes foisted a son on us once and positively outraged that they would try it again with Jebbers).
Stop embarrasing yourself.
A person can only win a contest by winning according to the rules of that contest. The American electoral system uses an electoral college to protect against the tyranny of a few highly populated cities running the nation. According to the rules, Trump won, therefore no matter what you say with your fevered imagination, HILLARY LOST.
You are like a fool who instsist that the team that lost the superbowl actually won because they had possession of the ball longer, scored points be damned!
... i.e. to paraphrase, if he won more votes then he'd be the winner. You then hypothesize that he could have won more votes if he's done something differently. TV reaches all states, he won the votes he won and would ever have won, NY Chicago and LA saw him on TV and his physical GPS location does not affect the outcome.
But yes, you are accepting the problem with being a 'winner' when the majority of the people across the US voted against you. Power comes from being the democratically elected people's choice, that's how democracies work. It's not that you can't see the issue, the majority of Americans can clearly see the issue.
"Damn, it hurts for me to admit that."
I read your comment trail, it's full of divisive 'Clinton ate my puppy' daily mail fluff and deflections equating Trump as Apple. It doesn't hurt you, you're just being the divisive you that you always are.
The Mueller investigation IS the coverup.
1. Mueller was running the FBI and is a long-time good friend of Comey.
2. Mueller handed off the FBI to Comey and then was involved serving Hillary in the Uranium One deal during the Obama years.
3. Mueller, Comey, and even Obama are all tangled-up in Uranium One (which transferred piles of cash from Russia through the Clintion org to who-knows-whom) and all three were communicating with Hillary via her illegal private server (so ALL are involved in her felonies, which explains why she was not prosecuted)
4. They all expected none of this to come out because they were certain Hillary would win.
5. Hillary funds an "October Surprise" intelligence report using a foreign spy who in-turn used russian spies as sources, and the document gets injected into the FBI where Comey uses if to get a FISA judge to OK spying on Trump and his team, and the FBI and team Obama leak fake tidbits from that "dossier" mixed with bits of info they got from the illegal wiretaps to their friends in the press, but it fails to stop Trump's election. This puts Comey and Obama in Nixon-like legal jeopardy if anybody finds out, so they need it to stay secret.
6. After Hillary loses, she needs to blame SOMEBODY for her loss which cost over a billion dollars, she blames Russia even thoug in the months before the election the entire Democrat team including Obama have publicly scoffed at the idea our elections could be tampered with, particularly by Russia (you can find youtube vid of Obama mocking the very idea). Democrats begin demanding an investigation of "Russian collusion with Trump".
7. The Democrats and the press demand Trump's AG Sessions recuse himself from the "collusion probe" because he worked on the Trump campaign as a volunteer and publicly met the Russian Ambassador when as a Senator he attended an event arranged by Obama's Stats dept - This is very "comvenient" becasue the Democrats have stalled Trump's appointments in the Senate and the #2 guy there is still an Obama person.
8. When Trump fired Comey, a move that SHOULD have been universally-approved given that both Republicans and Democrats had been calling for his firing for months, Comey leaked classified info to a buddy to have him indirectly leak it to a friendly press outlet specifically to try to trigger a special prosecutor.
9. When Sessions stepped aside, it left in-place Obama appointee Rosenstein, a friend of Comey who Comey could count on to name Meuller, which is what happened. While the laws that govern here require a crime to be listed in the documents authorizing the prosecutor, Rosenstein breaks this law and makes the commission open-ended with no specific law listed.
10. Meuller's team was supposedly investigating whether Trump colluded with Putin, but has instead been on quite a fishing expedition and leaking furiously. Every time Trump seems to get traction on something, the Meuller team leaks something (such leaks are criminal acts under the governing statutes) to the New York Times or the Washington Post to start a new distraction - the current leak is a perfect example: Trump goes to Davos and gets some positive press, Meuller then leaks that Trump tried to fire Meuller (a non-story given that [a] Meuller was NOT fired and [b] Fox reported that incident months ago).
It's rather apparent that Meuller's job is to try to keep a non-crime investigation bubbling along for as long as possoble both to immobilize Trump and to keep Trump's AG Sessions sidelined and unable to investigate Meuller, Comey, Clinton and Obama.
Since when did US become part of the "civilized world?" The country is a complete dump. It's an oligarchy (as per Harvard) filled with corrupt politicians; and I'm not even talking about Trump-- think Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan, and the rest of the trash. I always find it funny how idiots point to Russia when they talk corruption yet they're completely oblivious to the fact that they live in the most corrupt country in the world: USA. Americans are fucking stupid. Lol
You're moving the goalposts.
GP claimed: "He's the least popular US President in recorded history."
You changed that to: "Trump is the least popular president at this point in their presidential term"
And several of those examples don't appear to be any too far into their terms.
There's been no evidence released yet to prove Russian influence of the election, but all thinking people know it to be true. The media wouldn't be talking about it so much unless it was true.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
You really need someone to explain the logical fallacy of your argument? Maybe you could grow up and read a book on logic.
The media wouldn't be talking about it so much unless it was true.
Just like the WMD's in Iraq!
"His name was James Damore."
And the WMDs in Syria, eh comrade?!!
Not surprising that Der Mueller and this "Team" raped a FB employee, given that they payed Zuck to "supply" a pig to squeal.
You mean those investigations that were concluded before she was even interviewed? Or the times she sat in Congressional hearings claiming she either couldn't remember or "what difference, at this point, does it make now?" - those investigations?
I needed a bunch of nerds who still hang around this obscure irrelevant tech site to tell me there's nothing to see here. Thank goodness you random people on the internet know more than the former head of the FBI and his team. It's good to know there will always be somewhere on the internet I can go to be reassured that Trump did nothing wrong and America is just as bad as the Russians anyway.
Could you name the arrests involved with Russian collusion?
Oh, you can't? Did you know the FBI has a corrupt agent, responsible for one of those charges, that had to be tossed off the team? It looks like that agent is responsible for a REAL "obstruction of justice" charge himself, and any evidence he presented will not hold up and charges he brought will likely have to be dropped.
Did you know Muller covered for that agent instead of reporting his misconduct? That would be aiding a felony after the fact, another felony committed by Muller himself.
Did you know Comey used FBI budget money to help the Clinton campaign? WHOOPS! Did you know the DOJ and FBI colluded with each other to affect the outcome of an election? WHOOPS! Did you know the DOJ was wiretapping Trump's campaign illegally? WHOOPS (remember Watergate)
Yea, I'm against firing Muller. When you have an obvious corrupt cop running the investigation against you, that is probably the easiest way to get out. Also, day 1 Muller was told there is no Russian collusion evidence, so he has just been ripping off the taxpayers since then. Muller is a criminal.
Feel free to ignore this post, but a significant number of people in the country believe the above is true. Since the FBI and DOJ to day have refused to answer ANY questions that would easily clear this all up, including deleting evidence that would clear up or prove it, I'm just going to assume its all true at this point.
I do not watch or listen to those. Purely the facts from the investigation. If it walks and talks like a duck, it must be a duck. Many FBI agents are coordinating his take down. If that doesnt upset you, then wait to the tides turn and its a republican heavy FBI that takes down the next democrat president. It cuts both ways. You should be real concerned you doped up idiot.
And it's been incredibly useful. There's all sorts of nasty things businesses don't do because California won't let them and it's too expensive to run two lines of production (one for Cal and one for the parts of America where people don't get to vote). You shouldn't be content with your 'betters' telling you what to do. You should want your vote to count and be weighted equally.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
The only solution is to DEMAND VOTER ID.
Russia not only HACKED the system by sending out FAKE facebook ads that skewed the electorate but HACKED the ELECTION.
Voter ID is the only way to bring sanity to the process. Otherwise we have more Russia meddling.
If you believe the whole Russian collusion line I feel bad for you.
Interesting that you can't even call "bullshit" without bullshit.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Imagine what the Republicans would do if Muller was investigating president Obama under the same circumstances?
And consumption of Tide Pods.
Reality: Something like ~30 dumbasses have eaten Tide Pods. Cool story. We had Mr. Yuck stickers when I was a kid because kids are fucking Windex-drinking morons.
That number ain't even a blip on a chart.
Far cry from the media selling the idea that your kids are EATING TIDE PODS RIGHT NOW OH MY GOD.
You of course keep believing that, even though several American soldiers have been injured by Iraqi chemical weapons, and significant evidence that they've been used in Syria.
Just like the WMD's in Iraq!
When I try to explain that to people, they say, "No, that was different. Trump is much worse than Bush."
Trump is more annoying than Bush, but so far he hasn't started any wars, so he's better than Bush. That's a low bar but it was a low Bush.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Oh, my, someone hasn't been keeping up with current events.
FaceBook has even acknowledged they have a Russia problem. Every US intelligence service says Russia was interfering, and all of the intelligence services of our allies verify it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections
And we've found out lately that Russia was funneling money into the NRA and pro-Trump/GOP super PACs.
And they do this all over the world. The US is the only country not doing anything about it.
I can't imagine why.
...Or the times she sat in Congressional hearings ... "what difference, at this point, does it make now?"
Since it made no difference....
Just ask Trey Gowdy where your 45 million in witch hunt money went
Many FBI agents are coordinating his take down.
So...nothing but speculation and bullshit?
Figures.
wait to the tides turn and its a republican heavy FBI that takes down the next democrat president.
It's a 4:1 REPUBLICAN FBI now. Where do you think the leak threat came from that caused Comey to give the Republicans their October Surprise?
Last I checked HRC lost the election and Trump has been running things for over a year. The reason we don't give a flying foo about HRC is because she isn't the president. The president is subject to higher standards of scrutiny because he's.... THE PRESIDENT.
Anyone who sits around grinding their teeth about Hillary is a moron at this point.
Great point, the republitards ate that shit up back then. Of course Trump voters are even more stupid so anything goes.
Yes, there has been plenty evidence of Russian influence, unless you explicitly define Russian influence down to the size of a point mass.
Just this week it was revealed that Dutch intelligence caught the Russians hacking into the DNC, by them themselves first hacking into the servers that the Russian operatives used and watching them do it. Given the costs to Dutch intelligence having their own espionage ops outed combined with the other circumstantial evidence, this story is a lot more believable that the half hearted denials coming from the Russian government and their allies.
You have to be willfully obtuse to think that hacking the DNC and dumping their internal communications for the world to see is not Russian influence, and a whole lot of it at that.
Those chemical IEDs were old mustard gas shells dated back to the Iran/Iraq war. Saddam never had the bio-weapons labs he was accused of, and never had the anthrax that Colin Powell waved up in front of the UN. Syria is a totally different matter, Sarin doesn't have a long enough shelf life for it to have anything to do with Saddam.
also, on a related note
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK5T_rZmVyg
No it fucking wasn't. The EC was set up to protect against "the mob" selecting the president of the United States - otherwise known as preventing the poor and working class from having a say in their own governance. Same reason senators were originally selected by state legislatures, and why voting was originally a right limited to property owners.
Because the sacrosanct Founders were all a bunch of elitist assholes (even the ones who didn't own other people) who should have spent five years in a labor camp before being made to re-write the Constitution, before being sent back for another five years.
Another problem with this retcon is the fact that that the number of seats in the House (which the EC apportionment is based on) was capped. If it had kept expanding and each district was made up of ~60,000 residents like at the time of the signing of the Constitution, California would have 650+ votes in the College compared to Alaska's 12+.
Finally, something that isn't a bad comic book retcon. Yes, Hillary lost. After telling independent Bernie supporters to STFU about closed primaries because the rules were known in advance, and after saying that Trump would undermine our democracy if he didn't accept the results of the election.
You match Trump's above-his-average current poll against the absolute lowest point of every other president - how is that supposed to be comparable?
Why not compare everyone's lowest, where his 33 puts him merely sixth from the bottom? Or their disapproval rating, where he's second-worst. Or if you actually wanted to genuinely compare overall popularity, maybe look at the averages over their entire terms, where in a field ranging from 45 (Truman and Carter) to 70 (Kennedy), Trump comes in at a decidedly unpopular 38.5.
Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
"I can't imagine why."
Because it's not real. It's propaganda that you are now trying to justify thats why.
.. the reasons they forced Mueller to resign from the FBI in the first place....
I do not watch or listen to those. Purely the facts from the investigation. If it walks and talks like a duck, it must be a duck. Many FBI agents are coordinating his take down. If that doesnt upset you, then wait to the tides turn and its a republican heavy FBI that takes down the next democrat president.
LOL, right.
- James Comey, a Republican, was head of the FBI until Donald Trump fired him.
- Christopher A. Wray, a Republican, was confirmed as Comey's replacement in August 2017.
- Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General, a Republican, appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
- Robert Mueller, a Republican, is conducting the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
- Donald Trump, POTUS, a Republican, supposedly wanted to fire Mueller last June (shortly after firing Comey) but was talked out of it.
Whatever it is that's motivating the FBI and the Department of Justice to investigate the Russian connection to the 2016 election, it isn't partisan politics.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
US "experts" looked all over Iraq really wanting to find anything to help their political masters.
The expert who could look all over Iraq found vacuum cleaners, license plates, a swimming pool.
The "experts" the US media and press trusted so much all lied to the US media.
Now the same failed media is pushing social media stories about other nations winning US elections.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Now we have established that you have not read what our founders wrote and said, nor first-hand accounts of their deeds.
The electoral college was not set up to protect against the masses - that's a line pushed by liberal teachers to gullible students who they assume will never read the actual source documents, and it is pushed second-hand by idiots on TV who want to appear smart without also actually reading any source material and becoming educated. Your description of our founders reads like a 14 year old's comic book version. Our founders were very serious people who spent a lot of time and energy worrying about their descendents and whether the systems they built would hold up well over time. They were NOT as you portray them and you would know that if you were better read on the subject. These men risked EVERYTHING founding ther country and some lost nearly everything, they were NOT some pack of gilded elitist perfumed French aristocrats.
Senators were originally elected by state legislators for the very same reason there are two per state without regard to the populations of those states: Because the job of a SENATOR is to represent his/her STATE and NOT the population of that state. Members of the House represent the PEOPLE, which is why the founders wrote a Constitution that assigns House seats according to populations.
You would know this stuff if you were both literate, and sufficiently curious.
Yes, it IS a problem that we have not greatly expanded the House to keep the voters-to-representatives ratio better, and that's a reform that could be done at any time.
Team Hillary rigged the Democrat primaries in 2015 meetings that set the rules for the 2016 races, as I warned liberals here back at that time. I also warned them here in 2016 that they were wasting their time supporting Bernie because the outcome of the Democrat primary was already fixed. Incidentally, there are efforts underway right now in both parties to rig the 2020 primaries. The Democrats want to do a better job than before, and the "never Trump" establishment Republicans are desperate to perfect the strategy they saw Hillary succeed with (in her PRIMARY) in 2016. The big money interests in BOTH parties want to hand pick their nominees and they want the average Joe to just accept it. Trump has been a massive shock to these people and they are not amused.
1. The fact that this was known does not invalidate it, it CONFIRMS it.
2. What do you assert I think his role was? I only pointed out that he was involved in the deal (documented fact) and that means he is tainted by it.
3. Yes, sending classified content to an insecure server is a felony. I'd have gone to prison if I had done it back when I was in the Navy and had a clearance.
4. Admittedly, it was quite an assumption on my part that Meuller,Comey and Obama believed as all the press and pundits and pollsters and most Americans believed: that Hillary would win an easy victory in a landslide. Yup. That was quite a stretch.
5. Wow. The FACT that the dossier was a team Hillary funded political attack, created by a former British spy, using input he bought from Russian spies is all now so well documented that even the Democats in congress have stopped pretending otherwise and the current "talking point" is to pretend that because the firm that did the footwork previously (before involvement of the Brit and Russian spies) did some oppo research for some Republicans the later spy-generated stuff is somehow a Republican thing. [facepalm]
6. Go to YouTube. Yes, Obama said Russians were TRYING, but he loudly and sarchastically ridiculed Trump for suggesting that it was even POSSIBLE to succeed in tampering with our elections. Don't just rely on HuffPo selective editing of reality, look at the ENTIRE record.
7. BEFORE Sessions recused himself, there were many members of congress demanding he do so and pointing to his meeting with the Russian Ambassador as justification. Former Senator Franken made quite a spectacle of himself on this subject. Even Lindsey Grahm jumped on the recusal bandwagon, making it obvious to anybody that even moderate Repubs would require it. So, once again, look at the WHOLE record and timeine.
8. This is public record. Comey has publicly said he leaked his memos to his pals with instructions to leak them to the Times, AND the inspector General of the FBI has said the content of those memos was classified. Care to deny the existence of gravity while you're at it? A little googling might help you here.
9. No, Rosenstein was NOT appointed by Trump. Trump still has something like 60 appointees awaiting confirmation in the Senate where Schumer and the Dems have been slow-walking the process to a record-breaking degree. Trump has not even bothered to name an appointee for deputy AG because he has been told no such nominee will be considered while the investigation is underway. Rosenstein is a holdover.
10. You apparently do not read well. When information that ONLY Meuller's team has gets leaked to the NYT (one of the fave two outlets of leaks for Democrats) it takes a wild leap into fantasyland to believe the leaks are from somewhere else. Now as to the latest "leak", it's a more unusual one in that the NYT hyped a big story supposedly based on their anonymous well-connected sources (the Meuller team) but they just happen to have screwed up because this one item got out months ago and made it onto Fox because, in substance, it was actually beneficial to Trump therefore the other side of it was leaked to Fox. None of that stopped the anti-Trump folks at the NYT from hyping it as new and shocking as the "leakers" intended.
Now, I have ansered EVERY one of your imaginary debunkings, so .... where's the 80% you claimed were wrong?
Or are you bad at math too?
Of course they were elitist assholes. You don't get to be a slave owner without being an elitist asshole by definition, or limiting the right to vote to those who owned property. And even those that didn't own other people didn't want the proles having a say in their own governance. You can complain some more about those facts, but to paraphrase NDT, the neat thing about facts is they don't give a shit about whether or not you believe in them.
This was always an unbelievably stupid talking point, as that's a distinction without a difference. A state is nothing more than a set of boundaries and the people who live in said boundaries.
Stick to Dems and not this fan-fiction history, mmkay? Because yes, the DNC rigged their own primary, and would rather lose to Trump in 2020 rather than clean up their mess or change course.
Some people say Hillary collect billions.
Everybody knew Russia was running out of Uranium. They need it to fuel their atomic icebreakers and atomic batteries. In addition they need to make new atomic suitcase bombs and atomic landmines. Simply put, Russia raped America of it's precious and limited resource, our Atomic Ore. Lock her up!
Cambridge Analytica says it all.