Slashdot Mirror


A Single Line of Computer Code Put Thousands of Innocent Turks in Jail (www.cbc.ca)

Long-time Slashdot reader kbahey writes: Can a single pixel cost you your livelihood and/or freedom? Apparently, this has already happened in Turkey to thousands of people and their relatives. It all stems from the purge by president Edrogan following a failed coupe. The result is that many innocent people lost their jobs (and source of income), their freedom, their reputation, and more.

The details are frightening. The underlying technology is the use of 1x1 transparent pixels, as most web sites do, to track their visitors. This particular pixel was used by Bylock, a messaging app that the Turkish government deemed seditious, in their purge against Fethullah Gulen loyalists. Pre-dawn raids by police were conducted on those who have this pixel. The long legal proceedings caused a digital forensic expert to challenge those cases, because [the pixel using] the servers for Bylock was also being used by other applications for music streaming, and prayer times/direction of Mecca.

30,000 innocent people may have been swept up among the 150,000 Turks detained, arrested or forced from their jobs under state of emergency decrees since the summer of 2016. One 29-year-old high school teacher "wished the worst" for the revolutionaries accused of using Bylock, "until authorities said he was one of them."

The government eventually exonerated 11,480 of the wrongly accused, but some had already spent months in prison, and reportedly some even committed suicide.

109 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. And the others..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And the others were guilty? This really looks like 'oh, while trying to send the Jews into concentration camps, we made some mistakes and sent there some non-Jews'...

    1. Re:And the others..? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly -- the revolution was justified. Hope the next one succeeds and Erdogan gets a firing squad.

    2. Re:And the others..? by Kiuas · · Score: 5, Informative

      And the others were guilty? This really looks like 'oh, while trying to send the Jews into concentration camps, we made some mistakes and sent there some non-Jews'...

      That's pretty much exactly what it is. Erdogan was elected with a very very slim margin and he knows the country is split in the middle. The cities are highly educated and well off and in favour of a secular state and against totalitarianism. The countryside, Erdogan's base, is less educated, more conservative and more religious, and this is the group he's been pandering to the whole time. This is why he's slowly dismantling the secular basis of the state and inching it closer to a theocracy, which is for example why they made a law prohibiting the teaching of evolution in schools. His goal is obviously to ensure that his base stays ignorant so he can continue to enjoy their support.

      Whether or not the 'coup' was an actual attempt or state-sanctioned theatrics to justify the subsequent actions doesn't even really matter at this point. What matters is that Erdogan's done after that is unjustifiable: he's thrown out judges, teachers, shut down newspapers and stations, increased censorship and blocking of sites online, and so on. At the same time he's been consolidating more power for himself and amped up the campaign against the Kurds, despite the fact that the Kurds are in fact helping to combat Isis, , but he knows that all totalitarian states need both internal and external enemies. For him the internal enemies are now the 'Gulenists' as well as the Kurds at times and the external enemy is Isis.

      Not to mentioned with the courts now manned by Erdogan approved judges, what do you think are the chances for a fair trial for someone accused of treason? I mean this article demonstrates the standard of evidence that passes in the courts, it's essentially: 'you've visited these sites/used this app/shared this content, that makes you an enemy of the state'. Think about the fact that about half the country never voted for him, so how easy do you think it will be to find something 'anti-Erdogan'/anti Justice and development party that they've shared/liked at some point? Hell, if I was Turkish this comment alone would likely make me a candidate for facing a trial. I know for a fact that my Turkish ex-girlfriend who's an outspoken atheist and has been active in demonstrations against Erdogan for years certainly has a profile that makes her a target for prosecution, but I do not know if she's still free or not. And she's no 'Gulenist' as she's against the whole religion to begin with, but again, that doesn't matter to tyrants.

      So yeah, the country with 2nd largest army in NATO after the US and previously the largest muslim majority secular state is slowly turning into a totalitarian islamist theocracy and the attitude of the entire West is mostly 'oh well, the enemy of my enemy is my friend, can't be helped'.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    3. Re:And the others..? by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So yeah, the country with 2nd largest army in NATO after the US and previously the largest muslim majority secular state is slowly turning into a totalitarian islamist theocracy and the attitude of the entire West is mostly 'oh well, the enemy of my enemy is my friend, can't be helped'.

      And that is the truly despicable and repulsive thing here. Not that this has not happened before...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:And the others..? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's more like you go into work with a bit of a hangover and your boss who is a teetotal Islamist is telling you to get rid of all the liberals. So you do the equivalent of 'rm - rf/turkey/liberals". And then you realise that has side effects and a high false positive rate. So you tell your boss the Jews hacked the system and flee to Germany where you tell the authorities you're being persecuted by Islamists and tell all the expat Turks it was the Jews.

      Meanwhile the influx of Turks cause a rise of the far right, and some guy comes into work and his boss who is an austere vegan far leftist tells him to get rid of all the far right. So he does the equivalent of "rm -rf /germany/farright" and then realises that has both a high false positive and a false negative rate and support for the far right goes up, not down.

      So the far right come to power and try a "rm -rf /germany/turks" but as expected this has a high false positive/false negative rate and Germany has a civil war.

      Basically hungover IT drones cause all the pain and suffering in the world.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:And the others..? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      North Korea on the Bosphorus is far warmer in the summer and there are so many things to see.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    6. Re:And the others..? by sebrk · · Score: 1

      Yes, spot on. It's really amazing how Islamist manage to turn whatever they touch to shit. I hope the people of Turkey stand up. Eventually information/education will spread across the whole country or whatever is constituting Erogdans voter base will die out. They are all part of yesterday anyway. Horrible to watch the development of a dictator and theocracy in action.

    7. Re: And the others..? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I'm confused.

      (((Innocent)))?

    8. Re:And the others..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, spot on. It's entirely predictable how extremists manage to turn whatever they touch to shit.

      FTFY

    9. Re:And the others..? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The dumbest thing about it is that the EU cheered on Erdogan's attempt to curtail the power of the military because of 'freedom and democracy'.

      http://www.washingtoninstitute...

      On August 8, 2003, the seventh European Union (EU) reform package went into effect in Turkey, significantly curbing the role of the military in politics. This legislation, passed by the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government on August 4, follows six previous packages adopted since February 2002. Collectively, these reform measures have vastly liberalized the country's political system, facilitating Kurdish broadcasting and education, abolishing the death penalty, and subjecting Turkish courts to the European Court of Human Rights. Turkey now has laws guaranteeing freedom of speech, and the military is no longer the kingmaker in Ankara. As a result, AKP -- a self-styled "conservative democratic" party with an identifiable "Islamist pedigree" -- anticipates that Turkey will pass muster when Brussels reviews its candidacy for EU membership in June 2004. Ankara hopes that the EU will establish an accession calendar, opening the way for Turkey's eventual entry into the union, perhaps within the next decade. These developments are crucial to Turkey's future. Which path will the country take now that the military is stripped of its role as a decision making body? Will the EU open its doors to Turkey?

      Of course the EU turned down Turkey's membership.

      Then the coup happened and the EU condemned it

      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...

      Erdogan used the excuse of the coup for a full on crackdown of critics of his regime, and even convinced EU countries to arrest EU citizens

      https://www.yahoo.com/news/ger...

      And then threatened to unleash a wave of refugees on the EU unless Turks get free movement

      http://nationalpost.com/news/w...

      And big pile of cash.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/...

      The basic problem is that the EU and the West push freedom and democracy and do things like push Turkey to curb the power of the military. But the government curbing the military in Turkey won't lead to a democratic government in charge because Turkey is fundamentally different from EU countries. Traditionally the main counter balance to Islamism has been the military having a coup every few years.

      The EU have removed what was essentially an authoritarian check on the political aspirations of the Islamists and not replaced it with a more democratically correct one.

      And of course the EU screwed Turkey - it forced a bunch of reforms on Turkey as part of the price of EU membership. Turkey made the reforms and then the EU welched on the membership. And Turkey knows the EU is dependent on it to stop another wave of refugees

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re: And the others..? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Other extremists, like your typical antifa thugs, may indeed have the turning-things-to-shit instincts, but they're total amateurs compared to the islamists, who are taking over the world through migration and sheer reproductive inertia.

      The only thing that keeps extremists in check in the USA is that they aren't the ones running the country yet and so still get arrested for being too violent. If you ever got enough extremists in charge of the country (from the right or the left) then I guarantee their violence would increase too.

    11. Re:And the others..? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      powerful group of well-financed backers willing to prop up a particularly ugly core of militants

      Really! 110 billion ain't chump change, is it?. Shit goes way back, man...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    12. Re:And the others..? by slashrio · · Score: 2

      Agreed. One small correction though:
      The Kurds want their own state, which means separating parts of Turkey, Irak and Syria to become one separate state, Kurdistan.
      That's why they are the enemy of Erdogan.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    13. Re:And the others..? by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I for one never believed that the coup failed.

      I suspect that Erdogan had it planned all along and his coup worked as planned.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re:And the others..? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Erdogan was elected with a very very slim margin and he knows the country is split in the middle. The cities are highly educated and well off and in favour of a secular state and against totalitarianism. The countryside, Erdogan's base, is less educated, more conservative and more religious, and this is the group he's been pandering to the whole time. This is why he's slowly dismantling the secular basis of the state and inching it closer to a theocracy, which is for example why they made a law prohibiting the teaching of evolution in schools. His goal is obviously to ensure that his base stays ignorant so he can continue to enjoy their support.
      [...]
      So yeah, the country with 2nd largest army in NATO after the US and previously the largest muslim majority secular state is slowly turning into a totalitarian islamist theocracy and the attitude of the entire West is mostly 'oh well, the enemy of my enemy is my friend, can't be helped'.

      Remind you of someone in the west, a conservative who panders to his base of uneducated religious fanatics and tries to sabotage education and science and the separation of church and state? Someone who stokes ethnic tensions for his own ends, and whips his believers into a state of constant terror of internal and external enemies? Erdogan is a role model who the president of the USA has learned a lot from.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    15. Re:And the others..? by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Remind you of someone in the west...

      Yes.

      Erdogan is a role model who the president of the USA has learned a lot from.

      This is incorrect. The president of the USA is entirely petulant, ignorant, and reactive to whatever he has seen in the last 24 hours. "Learning" would require a degree of retention that he does not seem to possess. At most, Trump may witness a tough-man action by Erdogan, send an admiring, disturbing, and disruptive Tweet, and then move on to the next hamburger.

    16. Re:And the others..? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      This really looks like 'oh, while trying to send the Jews into concentration camps, we made some mistakes and sent there some non-Jews'...

      That's pretty much exactly what it is.

      In other news Erdogan is complaining that the Turkish ascension to the EU is taking too long while he's busy breaking the fundamental reason the EU was created in the first place.

    17. Re:And the others..? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Evveryone I know thinks the same.
      Lets see if it evver gets disclosed.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    18. Re:And the others..? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, regardless, he certainly grabbed total control of the country afterwords and could purge anyone disloyal without any repercussions.

    19. Re: And the others..? by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Extremists are already running things, there just happen to be enough opposition, moderates, and people with a brain to not cede total control to the extremists.

    20. Re: And the others..? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      The problem facing the dumb ass that ruling turkey is that those that were innocent are now not.

    21. Re: And the others..? by jgfenix · · Score: 1

      So did I, from the beginning. The army was the "guardian of the state and the constitution". Erdogan put his people in charge.

    22. Re:And the others..? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Turkey has much bigger problems than a secular vs religious divide. The country is hodgepodge of different cultures. You see, the end of the first World War saw the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire (who fought on the losing side). The European victors carved up the territory into most of the modern Middle Eastern countries we know today. They did so completely oblivious to the cultural boundaries of the indigenous people, which is the root cause of much of the instability in the Middle East today e.g. Iraq is three disparate groups of Shia, Sunni, and Kurds who more or less hate each other, trying to form a single unified government to represent a "country" formed along arbitrary geographic lines drawn by people thousands of miles away who'd never even heard of the words Shia, Sunni, and Kurd. This is why dictatorships work so well there - through brutality they manage to suppress the cultural differences enough to hold the "country" together.

      What became Turkey rebelled against the allied occupation after WWI, and won their freedom. But theirs was an alliance formed to eject an occupying force. As a country, the cultural differences still remain. It really would be much better off split into 3-5 smaller countries.

    23. Re: And the others..? by jgfenix · · Score: 1, Troll

      No, but he reminds me of Obama and friends. Change "religion" with "progressive thinking" and it's similar.

    24. Re:And the others..? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You might be correct. But according to TFS it's about some guy called Edrogan and a coupe, so all bets are off.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re: And the others..? by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      We do not need to import antisemitic memes from whatever vile corner of the Internet you frequent, even under the guise of humor. Take that shit and fuck off.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    26. Re:And the others..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except Erdogan isn't just "the enemy of my enemy".

      Sure, he claims to be opposed to Assad. But after ISIS overtook many oil wells at the point of a gun, the rest of the world refused to buy *that* oil so as to avoid funding terrorists. Erdogan, however, bought that oil despite pressure from his allies. And we're talking hundreds of millions of dollars being funneled to ISIS.

      Make no mistake: Erdogan *is* the enemy. This will become obvious even to the most blind observer in another decade or so.

      Unfortunately, the two biggest string-pullers in NATO have huge geographical buffers between themselves and Turkey, and so enjoy the benefits of Erdogan's policies without caring about the negatives.

    27. Re:And the others..? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Erdogan was elected with a very very slim margin and he knows the country is split in the middle. The cities are highly educated and well off and in favour of a secular state and against totalitarianism. The countryside, Erdogan's base, is less educated, more conservative and more religious, and this is the group he's been pandering to the whole time... His goal is obviously to ensure that his base stays ignorant so he can continue to enjoy their support.

      Anyone else in the U.S. get deja vu while reading that? :-/

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    28. Re:And the others..? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much exactly what it is. Erdogan was elected with a very very slim margin and he knows the country is split in the middle. The cities are highly educated and well off and in favour of a secular state and against totalitarianism. The countryside, Erdogan's base, is less educated, more conservative and more religious, and this is the group he's been pandering to the whole time.

      sed 's/Erdogan/Trump/g'

      works.

      damn, I hate that this actually 'works' when you replace one evil person with the current POTUS.

      the world over, people are mostly the same. the powerful manipulate the 'conservatives' (who are generally religion, less educated and more guided by 'feel' than fact) and this causes progress to halt or even retrograde.

      mouth breathers are the doom of us all. no matter what country.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    29. Re:And the others..? by chthon · · Score: 1

      Damn, no more mod points today. But I have also always been of this thought. If the army really wanted to get Erdogan, then they would have gotten him. What I mostly suspect is that minions of Erdogan were able to influence some hot-headed officers into a rash decision.

    30. Re:And the others..? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      We're talking about a military that routinely ousts governments. Thrice so far since WW2 alone. They know how to do something like this. They are well trained and equipped, I mean, we're talking about a neighbor of Syria after all. In that area, you want a well staffed, well run and well equipped military.

      And that military, of all the militaries in the world, runs a coup d'etat that does not try to occupy information centers, does not try to cut communication of the enemy, does not try to arrest the government (actually, the "coup" happened while Erdogan was on vacation and nobody knew where he was).

      Really? There is anyone on this planet who believes that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:And the others..? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't mistake official EU doctrine from actual opinion. Nobody in the EU believes the bullshit story about a military experienced with coups stages such an idiotic one. But Erdogan holds the finger on the plug to the flood of migrants. You don't piss someone like that off unless you want another million or two invading your country.

      If we didn't need him for that, for all we care he could rot in Anatolia like the son of a rotten bitch that he is.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    32. Re:And the others..? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What good is a 2nd if you don't even have a 1st?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    33. Re:And the others..? by DethLok · · Score: 1

      This needs a mod for "scary". And yes, I have mod points and it's already +5.

  2. Another reason to use Ghostery by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Do it now!

  3. The bigger issue here by gijoel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that an elected politician saw an opportunity to purge any resistance to his regime and the fact that innocents were caught up in it didn't mean a damn thing to him.

    1. Re:The bigger issue here by johanw · · Score: 1

      They are Turks, the most nationalistic people I've ever met. Far worse than a stereotype American redneck. They are committing another genocide on the Kurds now. They deserve all bad they get.

    2. Re:The bigger issue here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not really fair. Lots of Turkish people were protesting against Edrogan. The fact people were using this app is proof that they whole country isn't full of nationalist dicks. The problem is every country on the planet has it's share of dicks.

    3. Re:The bigger issue here by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Dicks? Comparing male organs (highly useful body parts that can also bring great pleasure) to minions of a dictator is doing the organs a disservice.

    4. Re:The bigger issue here by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      True.... the same can be said about the U.S. And, really, the U.S. is not a "shithole."

      Anyone who was going to visit the U.S. but decided against it because Trump was elected is a complete moron. Disneyland is not staffed with gestapo.

      Back on topic, my first though on reading TFS is that there was a mistake - 150,000 "innocent" people were arrested (and that's just in this current raid), but to many hard line Muslims, anybody who isn't one is not "innocent." When CAIR says it "condemns the deaths of innocents," they aren't talking about majority of people killed in terrorist attacks, they are talking about the Muslim "collateral damage."

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:The bigger issue here by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      The Gestapo's not at Disneyland, but they are at the airport. No, it's not normal to be strip searched, have your electronics seized, passwords to your social media accounts demanded - not in a free country, anyway.
      As for the attractions, perhaps they wanted to see our nature preserves that were de-protected last year, but they're not sure if they have been paved over yet or not. Or they weren't sure if the national parks and monuments that still exist would be open that week, or if our politicians would pick those dates to have their hissy fit.

    6. Re:The bigger issue here by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a pithy saying: being a democratically legitimate leader isn't entirely about being elected, it's about stepping down when someone else gets elected. We don't owe respect or legitimacy to elected leaders whose principle is one man, one vote, one time.

      The Western world has been taken too many times by this. Elections are a necessary but not sufficient condition for democratic government.

    7. Re: The bigger issue here by Hawks · · Score: 1

      IIRC from the news I saw this morning, international tourism into the United States was down ~4% last year while globally international tourism was up ~7%. The United States slipped to the 3rd most popular destination behind France and Spain. Feel free to correct those numbers if Iâ(TM)m wrong, not enough coffee yet.

      --
      in anima Apparatus
    8. Re:The bigger issue here by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Anyone who was going to visit the U.S. but decided against it because Trump was elected is a complete moron.
      Or he is just voting with his wallet ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:The bigger issue here by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Disneyland is not staffed with gestapo.

      Compare the Disneyland of today to the Disneyland of 20 years ago and you might think so.

      What was the justification again for searching customers to make sure they do not bring food, drink, or snacks into the park?

    10. Re:The bigger issue here by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Have you actually traveled? I just got back from a work trip - no strip search, no electronics seized, no passwords demanded - it's the same as it's been since GW.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  4. Enemies Everywhere by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dictators have always seen enemies everywhere; they need them to make themselves appears to be defending their country. Erdogan is a paranoid, ignorant git, no different than any other tin-pot dictator elsewhere.

    1. Re:Enemies Everywhere by gweihir · · Score: 1

      On the plus-side, he has better hair than Trump.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  5. A Thunderbird? by alternative_right · · Score: 5, Informative

    A coupe is a car.

    A coup is the death knell of an old order and regime change.

    Neither end up being what their aficionados see in them. The coupe is a mid-life crisis; the coup usually means a society moving into senescence.

    1. Re:A Thunderbird? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      A coupé is a car. A coupe is a type of champagne glass.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:A Thunderbird? by rgbatduke · · Score: 5, Funny

      And a coop is where we can put people after a coup, drinking celebratory champagne from a coupe, after driving them there in our coupe'!

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  6. That "coup" did not fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It wasn't "Gulenist" either. That's just the convenient excuse for our esteemed chief high goatfucker.

    I'm pretty sure mose people put in jail are innocent under western rules. Under goatfucker rule, they're guilty as sin. Obvious reasons are obvious. But as long as the Turkish people acquiesce and continue down this path, much, much more of this will continue to happen.

    So, get a clue, dear Turks. Get a clue. We've seen how this works, we've seen this very playbook in Europe, we've seen where it leads. The pixel isn't the point. The people in jail over tenuously alleged sympathies are. Not that I care much: Gulenism is but a hair different from Erdostanism. Nobody willing to put a religiously-inspired ideology over the good of the people is innocent. You had the vote, and yet you all still voted for the guy who explicitly said that democracy is but a train to get off of when you get where he wants to be. You made your bed.

  7. The other 120,000 by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    I am more concerned for the other 120,000 people who this 'purge' swept up. Calling the thousands who were also swept up 'innocent' implies something about the other 120,000 victims that many would say is inappropriate.

    1. Re:The other 120,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 120k are intended victims. The 30k are unintended victims.

    2. Re:The other 120,000 by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is it really a stretch to say that there are 120,000 Fethullah Gulen loyalists in Turkey? Gulenists in Turkey are millions strong. Here's a good writeup of the man and what he believes. Among other things, he ran off and America gave him shelter. CIA officers vouched for his green card (ouch!). He believes in segregating women. He's huge in the charter schools movement. His charter schools replaced qualified American workers with H1Bs and then paid them more than the Americans got. By befriending Gulen and giving him shelter, we infuriate Muslims in Turkey who hate terrorism but nonetheless loathe Gulen as a power-hungry opportunist. Is it any wonder why Turkey fears him? Let's not pretend he's the good guy here because the US government backs him - in fact, that's a pretty good indication that he's on the wrong side.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:The other 120,000 by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      No one is pretending that Gulen is the good guy. Remember: he and Erdogan used to be real chummy until they had a falling-out. The point is: the 120.000 people in jail may or may not be Gulenists, and may or may not have thought about rising up, but the only reason they are in jail is for opposing Erdogan.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:The other 120,000 by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Since this is primarily about scaring the population into quiet compliance, it could be argued that the 30k are not so unintended after all...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re: The other 120,000 by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Another victim of Slashdot's failure to support the umlaut. https://tinyurl.com/yaxrgwek

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:The other 120,000 by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Jailing activists and free thinkers is what leads to quiet compliance. Jailing the quietly compliant is what leads to revolution.

    7. Re:The other 120,000 by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Human history would indicate that you are mistaken.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:The other 120,000 by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He isn't the good guy. Erdogan and Gulen are like Hitler and Thälmann. Both threats to democracy, but one of them is now in power.

      Don't make the mistake and oust the one to let the other one take power. They both have to go if you want a democratic rule.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:The other 120,000 by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      A democratic rule is precisely what led to Erdogan. WTF? He's legitimately popular. He won the election fair and square. I think maybe democracy means something different from what you think it means. It doesn't mean "agrees with my ideas for Turkey".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:The other 120,000 by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Hitler was elected too, that means diddly squat.

      Whether Turkey still is a democracy will be seen when/if we still get to see democratic elections in the future.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:The other 120,000 by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Hitler was appointed by von Hindenburg.

      There are far too many people out there who shout "democracy is dead!" when what they really mean is "those people don't agree with my idea of how their society should go from here." It's hard to reconcile the two because they fundamentally do not understand that democracy means the will of the people. In places like Turkey or Egypt or Iran when the will of the people is honestly expressed and leaders are elected who they dislike, the immediate reaction is "that's not democracy!"

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:The other 120,000 by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hitler was elected. Yes, he was then sworn in by Reichspräsident Hindenburg as Reichskanzler. Because that's how the system worked. What you said is like saying the US president is appointed by the Chief Justice.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Much More Worrying... by ytene · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... is the West's reaction/response to what Erdogan has done in Turkey.

    Nothing.

    This is almost certainly because Turkey is geopolitically important to the West as part of NATO.

    If you think about it objectively, you realise that western governments have not previously hesitated to apply sanctions to nations which mistreat minorities or suppress democracy in the way that Turkey has done. Yet no such outcry met these actions.

    Much as we might be horrified at the thought, evidence on the ground suggests that as long as Erdogan supports the West with respect to Syria, acting as a buffer against regional economic migrants [i.e. refugees] - and of course having the potential to be a staging area for any form of military action in the region [ for example, Turkey was used as a launching point for air strikes against Iraq during both Gulf Wars] - then the West will simply turn a blind eye to this.

    If we could find an "honest politician" who was also willing to talk about this "on the record", chances are they would tell us that the West will continue to do this because this would be the "least worst" option - that condemning Turkey for the Human Rights abuse would risk moving Erdogan away from NATO and towards Russia. Not something that the West would find appealing...

    But this is just guesswork.

    1. Re:Much More Worrying... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      The whole point of having Turkey in NATO is that it allowed us to flank the Soviet Union. Thus, in Operation Barbarossa Part II, we would be able to present the Communists with an invasion from two directions: West Germany and Turkey. Now that the evil empire of Soviet Union is long gone and the far less threatening Russia is in its place, for some reason NATO is still around despite the wealthy first world nations of Old Europe that are well able to defend themselves.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Much More Worrying... by tomhath · · Score: 1

      NATO is still around despite the wealthy first world nations of Old Europe that are well able to defend themselves.

      Look at what led up to World War I, those same countries had very strong armies and navies. But they were all afraid one would attack another, so they kept building even bigger armies and navies until one little spark set the whole thing off. An alliance like NATO makes everyone more comfortable (or at least less uncomfortable).

    3. Re:Much More Worrying... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The threat from the USSR is long over. NATO doesn't need to exist any more. What, France is going to invade Spain or something? Laughable.

      Assuming NATO is going to exist, it is a MUTUAL defense pact. What does Old Europe contribute? Today, the nations of Old Europe are ungrateful freeloaders, refusing to contribute even the bare minimum to their own defense, while criticizing their American defenders for being militaristic baby-killers because they actually pay for a military. The Texas National Guard has about 30 times the rest of NATO's firepower....pitiful. If we have to pay to have allies, then fuck them.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Much More Worrying... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      What's laughable is equating the relationship between France and Spain to, for example, the relationship between Finland and Russia, or Ukraine and Russia. But then I suspect you'll call the bomber flyby penetration testing and annexing of Crimea "fake news".

      Applying pressure for more equitable NATO funding would be a positive, but in the meantime, we could unilaterally withdraw from the pissing contest in Afghanistan (great security we're providing there...) and use those resources for actual defense against our bona-fide national adversaries.

      The only political movement in the United States who sees the Yeltsin era as anything but a brief pause in Russia's global ambitions is... well, you know which one it is. It's a smooth move trying to keep the internal anti-Communist hysteria of the Cold War alive while downplaying the very real geopolitical chess moves Russia still makes - all while supporting perpetual war in Afghanistan, because I guess "We've always been at war with Eurasia" - but if the American people still have any wits about them, it won't quite be smooth enough.

    5. Re:Much More Worrying... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      I thought Texas was part of Mexico?...
      Anyway, I think NATO disagrees with you, considering the attempts to whip up an anti-Russia 'Feindbild' in Europe and the US in order to justify continuation of its existence.
      NATO is a bureaucracy, and bureaucracies don't want to die, even if they become useless.
      Although... Russia may not be militarily threatening to invade Europe (anymore), but the economic block that would arise if Russia would join Germany economically is actually a big threat to the American Empire at the moment, as it was for the last more than one hundred years.
      And that's the actual reason why Russia is villified so much, in order to keep Eastern and Western Europe politically and economically separated.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    6. Re: Much More Worrying... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Numbers mean nothing. I said firepower, not useless untrained soldiers. The French greatly leaned on USA during their overthrow of the Libyan government.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Much More Worrying... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ... is the West's reaction/response to what Erdogan has done in Turkey.

      Nothing.

      Not quite. Firstly what is going on here is the application of the democratic laws of the country within that country. What the USA or the West thinks of Erdogan is irrelevant given the laws were passed in a democratic way and are properly being ruled on by the courts of the country. We may disagree with it, but you'll likely find that a lot of Turks don't. That's the thing about democracy, it's not global, it is local. Frankly I'm surprised we don't sanction the USA for not doing something about their gun problem, but that's just it: a local issue for the local democracy.

      Just because a country has a lot of people and is a democracy doesn't automatically mean they think like everyone else.

      Now speaking of "nothing". The international views of the laws of Turkey, their application, and that recent referendum have effectively all but ended the hopes of Turkish ascension to the EU, something which they have been working on for a good portion of my own lifetime. So to say that nothing is happening at all is not true.

      But what do you propose? The USA come in and disagree with the laws of a sovereign nation as they are executed by a democratically elected government? Every time you've done that in the past it has resulted in instability if not outright war.

    8. Re:Much More Worrying... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If we could find an "honest politician" who was also willing to talk about this "on the record", chances are they would tell us that the West will continue to do this because this would be the "least worst" option - that condemning Turkey for the Human Rights abuse would risk moving Erdogan away from NATO and towards Russia. Not something that the West would find appealing...

      I think if you found a honest politician they'd say Erdogan is already a lost cause and Turkey is well underway to become a new Iran/Saudi-Arabia. I just hope we'll manage to save the Kurds somehow, even though it's a political minefield in Syria, Iraq and Iran too. They've made a massive effort against IS and deserve so much better than their governments are treating them.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Much More Worrying... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the economies of Germany and France (you know, the arch-enemies from a century ago) are so fundamentally dependent on each other that it would be economic suicide for either nation to start a war against the other one.

      It's similar with the rest of Europe. We're about to see what happens to an economy that is by no means as tightly coupled but still quite heavily interwoven with the rest of (western) Europe in a bit when the UK leaves for good. And when you look at how this goes down, imagine this times a hundred if any nation of Europe was stupid enough to try their hand at war against some other European country again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Much More Worrying... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The very last thing the USA could want is if the economic power of Europe united with the raw materials, the political and military power and the workforce of Russia.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Much More Worrying... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      However, maybe the USA should be as concerned about China...
      Or, and I think that's a better idea, just start to be willing to pay for what is consumed.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  9. Proof that a revolution is needed... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that 150,000 people were jailed and/or tortured over their use of a piece of communication software proves that a revolution is needed. KMaybe 30,000 didn't actually use the software. It doesn't mean that abuse of the other 120,000 was justified.

    Screw Erdogan -- hope the next revolution succeeds and the last thing he sees are the raised Kalashnikovs of a firing squad.

    The "Ceaucescu treatment" is better than the old bastard deserves.

    1. Re:Proof that a revolution is needed... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      proves that a revolution is needed

      Actually it proves that a revolution is in progress.

  10. Re:Turkey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmm, nope. They have (recently) achieved the magic 0% open defecation rate necessary for non-shithole status. All the Trump-designated shitholes have nonzero rates, with most scoring well into double digits.

  11. Take a good look by gweihir · · Score: 1

    This is where the west is going with all its surveillance and data collection. Calling the 120'000 that were actually using the messaging app "guilty" is "justice" about as perverted as it gets. It just needs a continuation of the current slow slide into fascism the west does and all that data collected about you _will_ be used in the same way. While worthless to "fight terrorism" or "protect the children", Turkey nicely demonstrates the primary use a dark and unjust state has for mass-collected data about people: To accuse people of thought-crimes and then get rid of them.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  12. tech vs truth and politics by Spilt_Blood · · Score: 1

    The most distressing part of this story is that this could happen almost anywhere... here in the US while we may not be a dictatorship(Yet???), our government has already been caught spying on us. Whats to say that they haven't used methods this extreme in the past to apprehend "suspects"? Tech can be very scary sometimes, it holds both wonder and danger at the same time. I won't get into "The Singularity theories" because it is beyond the scope of this comment, however Tech can most certainly be used for ill, and a lot of the time the "criminals" get away with it. The upsetting part is that, most of these "Criminals" are governments and their agencies, who use clandestine methods/technologies to "Better the lives of their people", but usually these operations have the opposite effect. Don't get me wrong there is something to be said about civil security, however all governments MUST fear their populaces, simply be cause they are usually VASTLY outnumbered! (I know, don't flame me for the reference to V for Vendetta, but this is truth) All of this being said nothing can/will change this until we as humans find a way to govern ourselves fairly(which I truly doubt is possible). We are all(Americans at least) raised to believe that we are all equal... this is true only in the sense that no one "Life" is more precious than another, but intellectually/physically we are most certainly NOT equal. I will skirt racism and say that Africans/and their descendants are better runners than most(there are always statistical outliers mind you), and this has been proven. What you will not hear me say is that (Tentatively said)"Blacks are superior athletes, because this is too broad to be proven... I for one have never seen an African American Curler(I'm certain there are some...) but my point is we are not all equal, and because of this fact there will never be a way to govern all equally. Someone will feel cheated, but this will/might be blamed on greed(no I will not discuss Religion or other Meta-physical garbage) which is why we have societies in the first place. A millennia ago the "smartest" cavemen decided that they didn't want to hunt anymore, so they made others do it for them, and "Pay" them (in meat) for keeping the women folk alive while the hunters were out... it might seem like cooperation, but it could just have easily been exploitation(this is just a theory). So I rambled a bit, but the point is that technology can be a dangerous tool, and it must be watched carefully by ALL parties involved. (I do not condone the use of a dictator for any country, it is simply too dangerous a path, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and I know that some people have no/one choice{Stay, Exile [I would chose exile]}) BTW: I know very little about the situation in turkey, I just wanted to feel like a part of the group... LOL

    --
    X = -([squareroot] [infinity]) X = (i^2 * [infinity]) or (-1 * [infinity]) X = "A Black hole"
  13. Stupidity by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Disregarding the political/moral issues, the idea of using a closed source messaging app and expecting it to be secure is incredibly stupid. Closed source software can literally be doing anything. It could be sending your photos, text, passwords, anything to anyone. People need to learn that closed source software is not secure, especially when it runs on a device connected to the Internet.

  14. Pre-planned by scsirob · · Score: 1

    The raids were conducted within 48 hours of the 'coup'. That can mean two things. Either the Turks have an incredible intelligence system that can pinpoint tens of thousands of 'guilty people' in such a short time, locate and capture them in no time. Or they planned this all months in advance and the whole coup was faked.

    My money is on option two.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Pre-planned by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound like Erdogan, he ain't the patient kind.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Just like getting accused of "racism" in America by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    The result is that many innocent people lost their jobs (and source of income), their freedom, their reputation, and more.

    Sounds familiar. Dissenting opinions can be punished by the state, or the herd, but either way, the outcome is the same.

  16. They were all innocent by aliquis · · Score: 2

    Thoughts shouldn't be a crime

  17. Re:Just like getting accused of "racism" in Americ by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    Last time that I checked, nobody got sent in the US for just writing n|gger on the internet. Correct me if I am wrong.

  18. The remaining 100,000+ people by stikves · · Score: 1

    The remaining people are in jail being accused of installing the wrong chat application. Unfortunately the real reason is that they pose a threat to the Erdogan regime.

    This initally might not make sense to go into an educated at the moment, however the make up of these people tell a lot. There are thousands of judges, academics, prosecutors, teachers, police officers, journalists who were put away. Looking at this, basically those who can uncover his bad deeds, publish it to the masses, and who can put them into jail for those wrongdoings are taken care of.

    It was covered in many places, however the stories are still heartbreaking:
    http://www.dw.com/en/turkeys-p...

    I'm still optimistic for the future though. The Turkish people have exercised democracy for over a century, and was heavily integrated with the modern society in the recent decades. These kinds of "blips" happen in the history, but hopefully they don't last long.

    1. Re:The remaining 100,000+ people by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      No, the Turkish have pretended to have a democracy for over a century, while engaging in genocide and oppression. Don't whitewash turds.

  19. End of Kemalism by Latent+Heat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is more to the story.

    There was this man named Mustapha Kemal. He was a war hero in WW-I for resisting the British and allied forces at Gallipoli. This fight was a disaster for the British side but it was a proud moment on the Turkish side.

    This man rose to becoming the leader of Turkey, and he embarked upon a system of reforms. Whereas he became famous for fighting the British, there is a sense that he believed that Turkey was fighting on the wrong side in WW-I, or maybe he thought Turkey's resisting the British at Gallipoli was a close thing, so he wanted Turkey to become more like the British or at least to be Westernized.

    He issued an executive order that writing the Turkish language change over from Arabic script to the Roman alphabet. He ordered that men and women wear Western style clothing and banned the male (fez) and female (head scarves) clothing associated with devotion to the Islamic religion. He renamed himself to Kemal Ataturk, the name meaning "Father of the Turks" as in founder of the modern secularist Turkey.

    He also set up this system of where the military would be the protector of his new secular Turkish-nationalist order. The arrangement was that the military was to stay out of politics, but were a leader to threaten to overturn the New Secularist Order, they were pledged to overthrow that government, restore the secularist system, and then return the government to civilian control. I am told that Turkey went through several cycles of this prior to Mr. Erdogan.

    This last but failed coup attempt was the last vestige of the Kemalist system. Mr. Erdogan's repression of this was a Caesar Crossing the Rubicon moment, the fictional Galactic Emperor closing down the Senate.

    With Kaddafi and Saddam gone, the last holdouts of a multi-cul secularist society in the Arab world are Sisi in Egypt and Assad in Syria and maybe, maybe, bin Salman in Saudi is moving in that direction. bin Salman will never support Assad because of his Iranian ties, and bin Salman's grand strategy is to pitch the Palestinians over the side to make peace with Israel to oppose Iranian power.

    My crazy brand strategy is that we should join forces with Russia and Assad and overthrow Erdogan. The man is really that bad to want to do this. My connection to that part of the world casts my sympathies with Kemalism, and Erdogan is the point-of-no-return for Turkey.

    1. Re:End of Kemalism by Cederic · · Score: 2

      My crazy brand strategy is that we should join forces with Russia and Assad and overthrow Erdogan. The man is really that bad to want to do this. My connection to that part of the world casts my sympathies with Kemalism, and Erdogan is the point-of-no-return for Turkey.

      Fuck Russia and Assad, Erdogan's biggest threat are the Kurds. Once they've dealt with ISIS there's a good chance they're going to show how fucked off they are with Turkey illegally bombing them.

      The challenge for the UK, US and others is that Turkey is a NATO member. That makes it diplomatically close to impossible to engage militarily against Turkey, let alone join a Russian or Assad led offensive. Anybody attacking Turkey gets fucked by NATO.

      The Kurds on the other hand have a claim that they were attacked by Turkey. That changes the NATO obligations, and that's why this is the interesting option.

  20. Re:Do people get arrested for un-PC speech? You be by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Are you aware that the UK is a different country from the US? Seems not. Just to let you know, the UK has always had significantly less protection for freedom of hate speech. The westboro baptist church wouldn't last a minute in the UK, but they're safe in the USA.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  21. Bullet in the head by skaag · · Score: 1

    That's what Erdogan deserves

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

    1. Re:Bullet in the head by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ain't worth the bullet. Use stones.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. This is a joke, right? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Erdogan decides to throw people in jail for looking at him funny and the blame is on the particular die he decides to roll for the arbitrary selection criterion?

    That's like Trump going out in the middle of 5th Avenue and shooting a random stranger with the blame going to the guy who sold him is shoes.

  23. Guess who likes this? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Donald Trump is salivating SO HARD right now as he wets his panties, dreaming of being able to purge the country like Stalin or Erdoan.

    Expect the next presidential briefing to cover "pixels" and how to track them.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  24. How did they find the pixel? by sheramil · · Score: 1

    How did they know someone's phone had the Evil Pixel? phone company records of IP addresses, or did the pre-dawn raids also involve searching the house for any phones and then trying to get a file manager app to show the appropriate directory? My phone isn't rooted, and it won't show me anything unless I threaten to hit it. I've never been able to get ES File manager to locate anything, even if I know roughly where the file should be.

    Also, slightly amazed that people in some places are being targeted for using the wrong app. I thought things were weird when the Rwandans had to check ID cards during the Tutsi/Hutu genocide.

  25. Re:Do people get arrested for un-PC speech? You be by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    UK.

    The site has "conspiracy" in the name - got a more reasonable source? Searching the name turns up some harassment charges but the warrant cites "I hate you so much I would like to see you butchered," alongside pictures of mutilated barbie dolls which isn't un-PC it's just violent.

    UK.

    UK.

    UK.

    UK,

    Singapore.

    Hey, this one is the US. But the arrest is for "let's lynch her" an explicit threat of physical harm toward a specific person, not for un-PC speech.

    UK,

    So got any actual US arrests for peaceful un-PC speech in the US?

  26. Living in Fear by MrKaos · · Score: 2

    And the others were guilty? This really looks like 'oh, while trying to send the Jews into concentration camps, we made some mistakes and sent there some non-Jews'...

    No need for comparisons, Turkey provided Hitler the template for the Jewish massacres under the guise of The Armenian Genocide. They've never apologized to the Armenian people and to this day deny that it happened.

    At least the Germans faced up to what they did under Hitler, Turkey has *never* faced the consequences of their fascism and remains as one of the primary examples of a culture falsifying reality so they don't have to bare the shame they so rightly deserve. Turkey has yet again provided a template for the next round of human rights violations a century after they did it the first time.

    Fascism is alive and well in Turkey so if anyone needs an example of what a 21st century Stazi would look like, now you know.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  27. The Volokh Conspiracy? by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Might want to look that one up; he's a law professor of some repute.

    Here's some more information of interest:

    https://www.cato.org/survey-re...

    https://today.yougov.com/news/...

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fac...

    I believe, if you scroll up, that the original post was:

    Dissenting opinions can be punished by the state, or the herd, but either way, the outcome is the same.

    1. Re:The Volokh Conspiracy? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      The original post is irrelevant. You were responding to "nobody got sent in the US for just writing n|gger on the internet". A bunch of non-US examples and two US examples that both entered threats of violence territory are clearly not counterexamples to the claim.

  28. Read the original post by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Dissenting opinions can be punished by the state, or the herd, but either way, the outcome is the same.

  29. Stay away from Turkey OP by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 1

    You misspelled Erdogan, swapping the 'r' and the 'd'. If you go to Turkey, you will face jail or worse for disrespecting Dear Leader. Besides, in Turkey noone is really innocent, if they harbor even a shred of the fraction of an idea that perhaps they do not always love Erdogan completely with all their heart fully and wholly.

    Disclaimer: my immediate reactions to this whole thread may be biased from having watched yesterday the first episode of the documentary Apocalypse: Stalin. If you want to learn about horrible dictators, that is a pretty good starting point.

  30. Re:Turkey... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    A new interrogation technique "Watermark Boarding"

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  31. Re:Turkey... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether to be appalled by this post, or applaud it.

    After careful calculations, examined and verified by 3 independent accounting firms, I've concluded the correct response is golf clap, non-sarcastically.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  32. Was it the code? No. by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking it was not the code.

    I'm thinking it was an authoritarian regime not being entirely good at oppression.

    Oh, well. As they say, you can't make an omelet without breaking heads.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  33. Lives destroyed by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Let's talk about lives being destroyed by accusations of racism, which fits with my original point:

    Dissenting opinions can be punished by the state, or the herd, but either way, the outcome is the same.