Slashdot Mirror


FBI Warns of Email Death Threats Demanding Bitcoin (abc7.com)

An anonymous reader writes: "I will be short. I've got an order to kill you," the note said, demanding $2,800 in U.S. dollars or Bitcoin. "I switched from being upset about it to, 'I need to get the word out'," one of its targets told a local newscaster. They filed a report through the FBI's web site.

"If only 1% of people send money -- there's no overhead for them; that's money in the bank," one FBI agent tells the news team. A quick Google search finds recent reports of two nearly identical threats using the same text.

"I have been thinking for a long time whether it is worth sending this notice, and decided that you still have the right to know... I've got an order to kill you, because some of your activity causes trouble to several people... I decided to break some rules, as this will be my final order... As soon as I receive the funds, I will forward you the name of the man [this] order came from, and all other information I have."

95 comments

  1. Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think investing in the currency of extortionists and criminals is a prudent move.

    I'll take one bitcoin for $20,000 please, and please store my investment on a web server controlled by the Yakuza.

    1. Re:Excellent Investment by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Considering that just a few steps down the story Deanonymizing Tor: Your Bitcoin Transactions May Come Back To Haunt You exists this could start to get interesting.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Excellent Investment by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      The FBI has been known to have a backdoor into Tor facilitated by CalTech researchers for the entire span of its existence. The law is only applied to people the government can gain by applying it to, hordes of extortionists, drug dealers, Human traffickers, and the ilk are what make people want to pay for their services, not something they seek to eliminate.

    3. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The FBI has been known to have a backdoor into Tor facilitated by CalTech researchers for the entire span of its existence"
      And exactly how many people other than yourself "knows" this statement is true? If you cannot supply even one irrefutable fact to back up this statement then you best keep your stupidity to yourself. People like you are the reason the Internet has become little more than a tool for extortionists of all types and sizes. Whether it is a nation state looking to generate and distribute propaganda to benefit the state or just someone who likes ruining peoples lives by spreading baseless accusations.

    4. Re: Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually whoever started web 2.0 destroyed the internet

    5. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      such nonsense

      USD is used by criminals more than any crypto in the world

      and btw, even the internet had a shady past at the beginning

    6. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think investing in the currency of extortionists and criminals is a prudent move.

      Hey Mr. Kneejerk Cantread, it has nothing to do with investing in bitcoin. The extortionist is saying he will take either dollars or bitcoin.

    7. Re:Excellent Investment by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The FBI has been known to have a backdoor into Tor

      They also have the pee tape.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Excellent Investment by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      You're shill level is showing through your post, but it's actually been leaked by multiple people over the years, from the researchers themselves to Snowden and a few others. I'm not Google, but lucky you, you have access to that.

    9. Re:Excellent Investment by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      /pol/ made up the pee tapes for the lulz, the Tor backdoor has been leaked by several people with source. You're free to look it up yourself.

    10. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Difference was there were reasons to use the internet that weren't either highly illegal or tinfoil-hat-crazy.

    11. Re:Excellent Investment by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      /pol/ made up the pee tapes for the lulz,

      I'm as skeptical of the pee tape thing as the next guy (Although it would be goddamn hilarious if it was true), but wheres the evidence that /pol/ had anything to do with it. That would require them to have had access to the intelligence guy who did the report well before anyone really had any idea the guy was working on this project.

      Now /pol/ taking credit for it, just to make shit even sillier, thats a probability.

      But I could be wrong.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    12. Re:Excellent Investment by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      USD is used by criminals more than any crypto in the world

      It is obviously time for Trump to put his money where his mouth is - and ban the US dollar!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    13. Re:Excellent Investment by omnichad · · Score: 1

      put his money where his mouth is

      Have we banned his mouth? I feel like I would know about this by now.

    14. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think investing in the currency of extortionists and criminals is a prudent move.

      I'll take 100 shares of Wells Fargo.

      FTFY, just in case you forgot how immoral this whole damn game is.

    15. Re:Excellent Investment by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Controlled by the Yakuza is great. Who steals from them?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    16. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did have some fraction of a bitcoin in some online wallet years and years ago.

      Of course it was hacked.

      More, please more freedom!

    17. Re:Excellent Investment by BabyAndTheButterfly · · Score: 0

      it actually is an excellent investment because at least dark market will embrace it - you are just being dumb and narrow thinking

    18. Re:Excellent Investment by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I think investing in the currency of extortionists and criminals is a prudent move.

      You mean US Dollars, right? I'm afraid there aren't many alternatives, because extortionists and criminals have been known to use ALL currencies, although using one with inherently traceable transactions like Bitcoin would be most unwise -- that's why most criminals stick with USD or switched to Monero....

    19. Re:Excellent Investment by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      I'm as skeptical of the pee tape thing as the next guy (Although it would be goddamn hilarious if it was true), but wheres the evidence that /pol/ had anything to do with it. That would require them to have had access to the intelligence guy who did the report well before anyone really had any idea the guy was working on this project.

      /pol/ is about 40% intelligence agents and 60% Jews, as unbelievable as that may seem.

    20. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris.

    21. Re:Excellent Investment by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The FBI has been known to have a backdoor into Tor

      They also have the pee tape.

      I think you are right. Isn't that the only part of the Dossier that hasn't been proven yet?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re: Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they can't find text messages of their agents. Lols

    23. Re: Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just "lose" your btc.

    24. Re:Excellent Investment by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      The FBI has been known to have a backdoor into Tor ...

      +1 for reminding us about it
      -4 for not providing technical details or following up on a three year old story

      The "backdoor" was accomplished by having the Tor user access a web page containing a compromised Adobe Flash element. Obviously this would only work if the victim had not disabled Flash in their browser. If a user is going to do bad stuff and try to hide behind Tor, they should figure out how to run NoScript or at least disable flash. For some people this was apparently too technical. From the Wired article:

      [Operation] Torpedo unfolded when the FBI seized control of a trio of Dark Net child porn sites based in Nebraska. Armed with a special search warrant crafted by Justice Department lawyers in Washington DC, the FBI used the sites to deliver the Flash application to visitors’ browsers, tricking some of them into identifying their real IP address to an FBI server. The operation identified 25 users in the US and an unknown number abroad.

      Those 25 users are probably enjoying the "attention" of their fellow inmates at this moment. Child molesters are not popular in the house. Flash was (eventually) updated to make the exploit obsolete.

      The decloaking demonstration eventually was rendered obsolete by a nearly idiot-proof version of the Tor client called the Tor Browser Bundle, which made security blunders more difficult. By 2011, Moore says virtually everyone visiting the Metasploit decloaking site was passing the anonymity test, so he retired the service. But when the bureau obtained its Operation Torpedo warrants the following year, it chose Moore’s Flash code as its “network investigative technique”—the FBI’s lingo for a court-approved spyware deployment.

      The FBI then setup their own ISP in attempts to lure bad guys. They also started down the path of developing custom malware.

      In late July 2013, computer security experts detected a similar attack through Dark Net websites hosted by a shady ISP called Freedom Hosting—court records have since confirmed it was another FBI operation. For this one, the bureau used custom attack code that exploited a relatively fresh Firefox vulnerability ...

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    25. Re:Excellent Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I think investing in the currency of extortionists and criminals is a prudent move.

      I agree. That's why I have US Dollars.

    26. Re:Excellent Investment by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      The one I was talking about was actually how the FBI runs about 20% of the exit nodes, more than enough to link the data together.

    27. Re:Excellent Investment by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It is obviously time for Trump to put his money where his mouth is

      I don't think even he has that much money.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    28. Re:Excellent Investment by retchdog · · Score: 1

      wait, what's the remaining 40%?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    29. Re:Excellent Investment by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      wait, what's the remaining 40%?

      Autists.

  2. Donald Jr's defense expenses must be ginormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can understand being under some stress about now. You almost wanna play hardball with Qatar as a national policy just to get your 666 5th avenue money, gnome sayin? Prison gon be testin' for slim shady the minionaire

  3. Talking about.. by MellowBob · · Score: 1, Troll

    About death threats. The head of the FFC skipped the CES event because of threats. Slashdot whined that he did not attend because he could not defend his anti net neutrality standing.

    1. Re:Talking about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The head of the FFC skipped the CES event because of threats. Slashdot whined that he did not attend because he could not defend his anti net neutrality standing.

      Why was the head of the Faith and Freedom Coalition being threatened?

  4. FBI should pay the $2,800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FBI should pay the $2,800 in Bitcoin, then deanonymize the transaction to find out who received the money. Once they know who received the money, execute the person who made the threat. Chances are that they're not in the United States, but there are more than enough American operatives around the world to make it happen. It would do society a favor to eliminate those who use criminal activity to mooch off of others and possibly terrify them in the process. In this case, it would be justice to execute the criminal.

    1. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      So that's why there are so many car accidents in Russia?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it's why Tom Clancy is a millionaire.

    3. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      In my world, "justice" includes things like a trial in which the prosecution must prove charges beyond a reasonable doubt, conviction, and sentencing in a court of law.

      Not too sure about yours.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      In my world, "justice" includes things like a trial in which the prosecution must prove charges beyond a reasonable doubt, conviction, and sentencing in a court of law.

      God knows, I'm with you fully on the need for a fair trial for someone who is accused.

      That being said, justice and the law are two related, but separate things. They're like morality and ethics: one is an innate sense of what is right, and the other is an attempt by humans to codify it into a set of rules and procedures.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    5. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extortion should be tried like treason: If you're caught red-handed, you're "executed" on the spot (SBC).

    6. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Even those accused of treason are entitled to a fair trial.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    7. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The FBI should pay the $2,800 in Bitcoin, then deanonymize the transaction to find out who received the money. Once they know who received the money, execute the person who made the threat. Chances are that they're not in the United States, but there are more than enough American operatives around the world to make it happen. It would do society a favor to eliminate those who use criminal activity to mooch off of others and possibly terrify them in the process. In this case, it would be justice to execute the criminal.

      That's why they're demanding Bitcoin.

      The trouble with a traditional extortion scheme is the money has to go somewhere, you either need to hand it off in person (big risk!) or arrange some kind of wire transfer (you can probably make this close to untraceable, but it's tough).

      But with Bitcoin all they know is the address of the wallet (they know that if they pay or not), and unless the owner of the wallet does something dumb to reveal their identity there's no way to know who actually owns the wallet.

      This is one of my big worries about cryptocurrencies, the extra level of anonymity enables a lot of extra corruption and criminality.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    8. Re: FBI should pay the $2,800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nigeria 403 scam...

    9. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      No, it's why Tom Clancy is a millionaire.

      A dead one...or so they would have you believe. Rumor has it he's taken over Patton Oswalt's identity. It's obvious from the recent photos.

    10. Re:FBI should pay the $2,800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty well established. Once his first wife was out of the picture the switch was easy.

    11. Re: FBI should pay the $2,800 by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      This is Nigeria's way of getting back at us for passing the Shithole Nations Act. But without it, we would still be in a government shutdown.

  5. Legalize lynching again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It ought to be legal to lynch criminals who create scams like this. Bring back lynching. It would do a tremendous about of good for society.

    1. Re:Legalize lynching again by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Add ID theft and some other crimes as well to that.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Legalize lynching again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By definition, lynching is illegal. And if you're trying to advocate vigilante justice, well, let's just say that's illegal for good reason.

    3. Re:Legalize lynching again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the recent mistake record of LEOs, I'd like to see some stats on how often vigilantes make similar mistakes.

      Also, vigilantes would actually be punished when they make mistakes. LEOs, not so much lately.

    4. Re:Legalize lynching again by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bring back lynching. It would do a tremendous about of good for society.

      Yes, it's much more fun to string up those uppity Negroes or even set them on fire than be bothered with the niceties of a trial.

      (And do not even try to tell this good ol' Southern boy that lynching means anything else other than "those people aren't real people like us, so we can kill them whenever we feel like it".)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:Legalize lynching again by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      It ought to be legal to lynch criminals who create scams like this. Bring back lynching. It would do a tremendous about of good for society.

      I don't recall that lynching was ever legal. Certainly it was never just.

      Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it. What if a mob decided that you were guilty of something, and they were not prepared to wait for a trial to determine your fate?

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    6. Re:Legalize lynching again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First they lynched the nazis, and I said nothing because I was among the slightly educated by comparison.

    7. Re:Legalize lynching again by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      (And do not even try to tell this good ol' Southern boy that lynching means anything else other than "those people aren't real people like us, so we can kill them whenever we feel like it".)

      Did anyone claim that these extortionists are black?

    8. Re:Legalize lynching again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The extortionists have a big position in bitcoin. They demand the BTC be sent to an imaginary address, thus destroying it forever. For absolutely no risk they are deflating the pool of bitcoin to their advantage.

    9. Re:Legalize lynching again by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Bring back lynching. It would do a tremendous about of good for society.

      Yes, it's much more fun to string up those uppity Negroes or even set them on fire than be bothered with the niceties of a trial.

      You forgot dragging them behind pick-m-up trucks.

      In a country where white people are rapidly becoming a major minority, it isn't wise to encourage lynching. But then, we have some pretty good proof we aren't all that wise.

      Just to be certain, I'm agreeing with you.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  6. Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The scam e-mail, which first appeared in December 2006, purports to be a hired assassin, but is in reality a mass spamming looking to grab your personal information. Replying to the e-mails just sends a signal to senders that they’ve reached a live account. It also escalates the intimidation, the FBI said in a report last year."

    https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2007/january/threatscam_111507

    1. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by sheramil · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The scam e-mail, which first appeared in December 2006, purports to be a hired assassin, but is in reality a mass spamming looking to grab your personal information.

      Right. Because if someone emails you, saying "By the way, I've been hired to kill you," the very first thing you do is give them your personal information.

    2. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. As soon as they ask for that, a sane person should probably ask, "If you don't know who I am, I guess you can't kill me, then," and ignore all further emails.

      WARNING: SARCASM AHEAD. DO NOT ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED BELOW.

      That said, if you want a response that would be far more entertaining (for anyone observing from a sufficiently safe distance), one could always up the ante. For example:

      Scammer: For $2,800, I'll give you the information about the person who hired me to kill you.
      Victim: I'll give you [some significantly larger amount], under one condition: First you have to bring me the severed head of the person who hired you to kill me.

      This is likely to provoke one of two reactions: A. They're the FBI. You spend a few months in a jail while your lawyers smack them around for entrapment, and if you're really unlucky, you spend the rest of your life with a cellmate named Bubba. B. They think you're the FBI. They flee to another country that lacks an extradition treaty with the United States and never contact you again.

      However, there is always the risk that you might come home one day to find a head-sized box on your porch. So one should probably have a passport ready before contemplating such a response, along with a plane ticket to a country that lacks an extradition treaty with the United States. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The scam e-mail, which first appeared in December 2006, purports to be a hired assassin, but is in reality a mass spamming looking to grab your personal information.

      Right. Because if someone emails you, saying "By the way, I've been hired to kill you," the very first thing you do is give them your personal information.

      "If you respond to the scammer, he will then try to intimidate you into sending the initial $3000, ostensibly to stop him proceeding with your murder. At this point, of course, he knows nothing about you. But, during your correspondence with the scammer, he may trick you into revealing personal information about yourself. And, once he has some initial details such as your name and location, he may be able to discover more information about you via publicly available records. He can then twist this information around in later messages to make it appear that his henchmen really are watching you."

      Source: http://www.hoax-slayer.net/contract-killer-scam-email-resurfaces/

    4. Re: Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could pay the man, he did just save your ass.

    5. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by meglon · · Score: 2
      You have new mail!

      "I have been thinking for a long time whether it is worth sending this notice, and decided that you still have the right to know... I've got an order to kill you, because some of your activity causes trouble to several people... I decided to break some rules, as this will be my final order... As soon as I receive the funds, I will forward you the name of the man [this] order came from, and all other information I have."

      Hit REPLY to respond.

      Dear Sir,

      I appreciate you coming forward to inform me of this unpleasant business, however I am already aware of whom it was who hired you, and as of 43 minutes ago, they are deceased. Also of note, our security services are already tracking your whereabouts thanks to information gleaned from your message. To show my appreciation, I will give you a full 24 hours to say goodbye to you family and friends, and to make peace with whatever God you choose to believe in. If there is a particular place you wish to be at the time of your death, please be there, otherwise security services will carry out the task at hand in the wrong place. Please remember, do not wear the suit you wish to be buried in as it will most likely be damaged beyond repair.

      Again, thank you, and have a nice day.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    6. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You forgot C. They're definitely not in the US already - there is no downside for them.

    7. Re: Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you paid the hitman, and someone really wanted you dead, they would want proof of the kill, so when the actual perpetrator finds out you're still alive, they would just send another hitman or find a different way for you to commit suicide.

    8. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more effective if you reply by courier.

    9. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have this thing called a spam folder-I would never see the "threat" in the first place.

    10. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's been trying to kill you since 2006, he's a professional that doesn't like rushing perfection.

    11. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're definitely not in the US already - there is no downside for them.

      The American government can either have them extradited to the United States or killed with a drone strike if the foreign country won't cooperate. Nothing can protect any individual anywhere from the wrath and power of the United States. Don't believe that? Just ask Osama Bin Laden.

    12. Re:Serving hits since 2006 apparently by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      ...snipsnip... Nothing can protect any individual anywhere from the wrath and power of the United States. Don't believe that? Just ask Osama Bin Laden.

      Or the politicians, economists, credit rating executives, bankers and brokers who steered us into the subprime mortgage crash in 2007. Boy they're suffering now.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  7. Wrong 1% by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man if they're only asking for $2800, they're definitely targeting the wrong 1%.

  8. Fools by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People watch too many movies. Hired killers aren't Leon the Professional. They're Joe-Bob the alcoholic that your wife met at the bar and slipped $500 to whack you with a crowbar. That's why they get caught all the time, in the rare case that it's not just a sting to catch people trying to hire a contract killer.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  9. Only $2800? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd like to think that the guy hired to kill me would need a lot more than $2800 to double-cross the guy that hired him to kill me. How little did I piss someone off for it to only be worth $2800 to call off the killing?

    1. Re:Only $2800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break this to you, but your life apparently isn't worth much.

    2. Re:Only $2800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think that the guy hired to kill me would need a lot more than $2800 to double-cross the guy that hired him to kill me. How little did I piss someone off for it to only be worth $2800 to call off the killing?

      You should really reread the death threat. It said nothing about calling off the hit, just forwarding you information on who the person who call for the hit. So, they can bring the information along and give it to you right before the kill you. You'll just be stupid enough to have spent $2,800 for basically nothing.

    3. Re:Only $2800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than 1/4 bitcoin! I would be very disappointed.
      They are also taking a big risk that someone that actually pays 1/4 bitcoin will spend another 99 3/4 bitcoin to go after him.

    4. Re:Only $2800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on https://www.havocscope.com/black-market-prices/contract-killing/ the typical price in the USA is a few hundred to $25000, so the price appears to be in the right range.

  10. Damn, those Nigerian Princes have gotten violent. by locater16 · · Score: 1

    ;P

  11. Fuck BitCoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had it with it. Used for crime. Wastes electricity. It's a Ponzi scheme. Not a substitute for fiat currency. So fuck it. Ban it. If you don't like the way your fiat currency is being used then stop voting the same shitty politicians.

    1. Re:Fuck BitCoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ban bitcoin, lol....ban math, ban oxygen, ban torrents, ban encryption....stupid fucking toddlers on a nerd forum....

    2. Re:Fuck BitCoin by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Banning Bitcoin will work about as well as banning gold did (remember?). Better to let BTC run away until some exchange gets hacked for $10 billion right in the middle of one of those periodic price plunges, setting off a cascade of panic selling. That's the only way to educate people.

  12. If it only costs $2800, then.... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    ... the person is *NOT* any kind of professional hitman, as the letter would suggest, unless he's somehow gotten displaced in time by about a hundred years or more.

    Honestly, the letter would sound a whole lot more convincing if there were a few more zeroes in the figure... at least 2 more, and more likely 3.

    1. Re:If it only costs $2800, then.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading the summary. It can prevent coming across as a total imbecile.

    2. Re:If it only costs $2800, then.... by Pembers · · Score: 1

      Considering that the aim of the scam is to convince the victim to hand over money... how many people could come up with $2,800 by tomorrow if they thought their life depended on it? Now add a zero or two and ask the question again. (Also, how many people could even tell you the going rate for a contract killing?)

    3. Re:If it only costs $2800, then.... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing a stat on the average price of a contract killing. It was much lower than Hollywood would have you believe. IIRC, something like $5000. I'm not going to google it, but go ahead if you're curious.

    4. Re:If it only costs $2800, then.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If a person is going to be paid to do something that will get them thrown in jail for an awful logng time if they should get caught, I'd think they'd expect to be paid enough to be assured of a nice little nest-egg when they got out.

  13. Even less believable than by dwywit · · Score: 1

    the one that purports to come from l33t haxorz in .ru or .ro, claiming to have downloaded malware to your computer when you visited a porn site, harvesting your address book and social media contacts, and turning on your webcam and microphone to record you masturbating. "Pay us bitcoin or we'll send the footage to everyone in your contact lists. Your police can't do anything as we're not in your country."

    The spelling from the threat above is just a guess, my interpretation of what was actually received. The real message is atrocious, I've seen 419 scams with better spelling.

    I should create a social media "presence" one day - it could be fun, poisoning that well.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  14. Much threat by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

    So death

    Please send $2800 in DogeCoin to stop

    Wow

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  15. Sad by dreamygeek · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin stealing has reached a whole new level. sad

  16. 'threatening' http urls too by sjwest · · Score: 1

    websites used also get requests like

    i_will_killl_you_today

    back then and recorded - so the nsa and five eyes know as they record traffic in Room 641A

  17. Real killer exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some are never caught, some caught decades after. You don't hear much about them because they don't whack joe random,'s wife they whack other in the drug trade which are obstacle, or broke a rule. And since most don't care about those victims, neither do they make good selling news, you don't hear about them. Sure Leon was a fiction. But real killer for hire do exists and do not get caught. In fact fully 50% to 70% of murder never get caught.

  18. It's all these gig economy apps by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they've got no overhead so they're really cutting into the cost of hiring an assassin. Sure I can call a hit out on somebody for a fiver, but your getting an untrained amateur instead of a licensed & trained murderer. The other day a 'ninja' showed up to kill me wearing black pajamas and what looked like a plastic sword. I gave him one star.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. FBI is unreliable and biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These so called "death threats" are almost certainly not true. I bet the FBI is working for Soros and Clinton and just trying to find a way to frame more innocent folks just like they did to Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort and Julian Assange.

  20. Untuckit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I received one of these a few months ago. I use a different email address for every website I sign up on, so I can figure out where my spam comes from and easily block it. The Bitcoin ransom email went to the address that I used to sign up at Untuckit (the shirt company).

    I replied to a post on Reddit where another person had received an identical letter, and turns out they were an Untuckit customer too. I emailed Untuckit to let them know that their database had been stolen/hacked, but received no response from them.

    So, I wouldn't buy anything from Untuckit unless you want to have threats made on your life.

  21. Once you've lived in downtown L.A... by CyberRacer · · Score: 1

    The only measured and resonable response is "Bring it on Bitch!!"

  22. I'm dead meat by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    I rarely read my email. And I don't believe in BitCoin. I wonder if they'd accept milk and cookies or my firstborn?

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.