Slashdot Mirror


Finland Will Introduce a Mobile 'Driver's License' App (yle.fi)

The Finnish Broadcasting Corporation reports: Simo Karppinen, Unit Head at the Finnish Transport and Safety Agency Trafi, says it plans to roll out an app that will function as a free digital driving license by the end of summer. The agency said it expects many Finns to take up the use of the digital driving license as soon as it is released. The digital license has been in use by a test group who report successfully using the app where proof of identity is required, such as picking up postal packages. Other uses for the digital license include informing the owner of license renewal dates... The digital driving license will not record the location of its user or serve as a tracking device.
Slashdot reader Kiuas writes that it's being used as a supplement for traditional card licenses rather than a replacement, because "Current Finnish law mandates that all driver's licenses are handed out in a physical form. So everyone will still get a physical driver's license, but those who wish to do so can now leave their card at home and use the app instead.

61 comments

  1. Huh? by klingens · · Score: 1

    How is this supposed to work on a rooted Smartphone?
    Banking software usually has root detector software integrated, but as various demos and lectures at hacking conferences have shown, their success rate is probably somewhere below the average AV software against malware.
    If banking malware can make appear anything on screen, so can a software to "emulate" this. Of course, if it goes through everywhere, then using fake ID for bars, driving when underage, etc. just got a lot easier.

    1. Re:Huh? by infolation · · Score: 1

      And I'd like to know how it will work on my Nokia Brick!

    2. Re:Huh? by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Truth-on-server. The officer doesn't rely on on the information displayed on the screen to do anything except point at an entry in the police-accessible database. And that database must already exist, since the State today has to keep track of whose license is expired, who got a DUI, who has a CDL/motorcycle endorsement, etc...

      For instance, you could easily have you phone display a QR-code that encoded something like license-tracker://US.California.DLIDv2.1234512345 (someone probably screwed up v1). All the information then comes down from the already-existing-today backend. If you lie and say you are record #5432154321, then hope that person's photo looks just like you (and anyway, look-alike photos are an equal problem with physical licenses, couple of my friends had older siblings above the drinking age :-) )

      This is actually step up in security from truth-in-hard-to-forge-plastic with fancy holograms and other anti-counterfeiting measures. The essence there is the relying party assessing whether the document is legitimate. In the truth-on-server model, the relying party checks their own authoritative record and doesn't have to trust anything from outside it.

      [ Of course, this is assuming all-online. Obviously hard-to-forge instruments were created expressly for offline verification. The construction of a hybrid approach is left as an exercise for the reader. ]

    3. Re:Huh? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How is this supposed to work on a rooted Smartphone?

      I know nothing about Finland's system (even after reading the nearly content free article), but California considered a DL app several years ago, and several of these issues were raised.

      If a cop pulls you over, they can look up your DL# and verify it matches what is displayed by the app, just like they can currently verify a physical card. So no underage driving.

      In a bank, the teller can give you a multi-digit code, which you enter into the app, which then verifies your info through DMV's server. There is no reason that a licensed bar could not do the same. So no underage drinking.

      Every problem that you list would actually be LESS of a problem with this system than with a physical ID.

    4. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How or why would it matter whether the phone us rooted?

    5. Re:Huh? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      People are always confusing me with #5432154321... I’m getting really tired of it.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Huh? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Is there any sort of legal guidance in California stating that just because your phone is unlocked (to display the app) doesn’t mean the police can just take the phone and start searching through it?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Huh? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      California does not have a DL app. It was proposed as a bill in 2015, but never voted into law.

      So, no, there is no guidance for police officers about the use of an app that does not exist.

    8. Re:Huh? by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      No need. Just have the app make it visible from something akin to apple wallet. I don't have to unlock my phone to use my boarding passes.

    9. Re:Huh? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I assume any such system would have a challenge / response built into it. i.e. Cops turn up, allows them to type your license into it and they expect to see some kind of reaction / code appear on your device. And if it doesn't then you'll be required to produce your actual licence at a station in the next X days.

    10. Re:Huh? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The phone has to match the licence plate reader and the facial recognition.
      Thats a few data sets. The face of the person at the time of contact with police. The car they are using. The data on the phone, the phone account.
      The "rooted Smartphone" will have to match the car and any big gov database with a persons history, photo in that nation.
      The face of the person seen by the police at that time, their image, data sets on the phone ID, phone data and car plate have been seen together for years, past CCTV images of the face, plate? Thats good.
      The "rooted Smartphone" is hours or days old as an account? Thats more interesting. The face is new to the city, nation, not seen on national CCTV? The car is "rented"?
      The short term account on a "rooted Smartphone" just makes the person more interesting. Normal people have years of phone accounts looking for low rates but they are all in the system as account changes by the same person. So is their face and years of national ID use, CCTV seeing their car use, having a bank account, utility payments, paying rent, for a house.

      Altering a smartphone will have to go with altering CCTV, a past history in the nation, accounts and separated databases. All to mach a face of a person new to the nation.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    11. Re:Huh? by hankwang · · Score: 1

      Why have an app? Kust a picture of the qr code or a paper printout would work just as well. Or just tell tjem your name and DoB and have them look it up on the server.

    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth-on-server.

      The blockchain! Put it on the blockchain. And add a cryptocurrency to it with which you can pay road tax, toll and tines. ?? Profit!

    13. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would they track where you are if they don't have an app?
      How long until they turn on mandatory location "because terrorism"?

  2. will not record the location of its user by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 0

    Go on...tell me another one.
    That's funny right there.

    1. Re:will not record the location of its user by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      Even if it doesn't track your location, it represents yet another attack vector on your phone. They didn't say anything about not sucking up all the other data on it.

      Other than that I like the idea. As long as it's optional and I can still use a regular driver's license like I do now.

      Current traffic stop:

      "License and registration, please." (just kidding - they never say "please")

      Future traffic stop:

      "Hand over your phone"

      Far distant dystopian future:

      You don't have to hand over anything - they already know who you are,

    2. Re:will not record the location of its user by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The far distant isn't that far at all.

      And in Europe you generally don't have to hand over the registration papers, the license plate is already checked when they stop you and if there's a doubt then they check the VIN on the car.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:will not record the location of its user by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Go on...tell me another one.

      That's funny right there.

      Considering you can just tap the “Deny” button at any “The Mobile Driver’s License app would like to use your location” prompt that might appear, I don’t see why it’s that hard to believe. After all, they’d just be another app, with no more access to your location than any other. I have no problem with this notion, provided they don’t mandate through law that location data be enabled for their app with no opt-out or ability to use a physical license instead.

    4. Re:will not record the location of its user by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Would a gov/mil/police request ever respect the consumer level user settings?
      Would any consumer level user settings the user could track show what the gov app was OS and hardware approved to do?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:will not record the location of its user by blindseer · · Score: 1

      You don't have to hand over anything - they already know who you are,

      When I opened an account at my new bank they asked if I would allow them to scan my driving license to keep on file. I didn't think much of it until I went to the bank later. I walked up to the counter, gave my name and asked to do a withdrawal. The teller punched in my name and my photo popped up on her screen, she processed my withdrawal very quickly after that. I still had to sign my name on a little digital scanner, much like one would see at a checkout for using a credit card. Of course the bank had cameras watching everything I did. I didn't have to give the teller a piece of paper to "prove" who I am. Trusting a piece of paper as any kind of identifying document is a fail to start with. Even Sam's Club figured this out with their membership cards, they will take your picture and print it on the membership card only as a backup, the real record is in their computers and the cashiers will check your face with what is on their screen when ringing up your sale.

      Now, tell me how this interaction with my bank is all that different than with a police officer that might, for example, pull me over to tell me I had a burnt out taillight? They have a computer with my photo in it. The vehicle is registered and a plate is visible. The officer will most likely run my plate before leaving the cruiser, find that I am the owner, and get my photo. When the officer comes up to my window there will be a dash computer printout or a tablet computer to compare my face to the photo on file. Assuming my face still looks like the photo, and I don't have any other reason for the officer to have an interest in me, then I should be on my way quickly with perhaps a piece of paper from the officer to remind me that I need to fix my taillight.

      If you don't want the government to "already know who you are" when doing traffic enforcement then we'd need to do away with license plates and licenses to drive. I don't just mean the physical license plates and identifying cards, I mean no more registration of vehicles or government testing for driving. If you believe that the government having the ability to scan license plates, or that having your photo on their computer, is a problem then I'm having a problem with finding a solution than ending the practice of needing prior government approval to drive on public roads.

      If you believe that safety on the roads is more important than your privacy then we have come to what Dr. Franklin warned us about long ago. Those who choose safety over liberty will get neither safety or liberty.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    6. Re:will not record the location of its user by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Would a gov/mil/police request ever respect the consumer level user settings?
      Would any consumer level user settings the user could track show what the gov app was OS and hardware approved to do?

      How long would the government be able to keep quiet this ability to track the users of their apps? I'm sure that people would not be surprised that the government would lie to them but then if the government did lie then people would simply not use the app. What do you expect the government to do then? Require smart phone users to install the app? Then people will leave the phone home, wrap the phone in aluminum foil as they drive, or find other ways to subvert this.

      I'm assuming Finland has some level of democratic representation in government. If there are enough people that find the government lied to them on tracking their movement then this can be corrected in the next election.

      Also, the phone OS developers would have to be in on this. They'd have to have a "hook" in the OS for the government supplied app to be able to track location even though the user requested that location data not be sent to the app. How long in a free economy would a company like this still be able to sell phones?

      This is from someone that has a serious mistrust of government but even I find this difficult to comprehend as any real threat.

      What this app does is provide a means to present a government identifying document to non-government entities. The government would already have your photo on file. This is not much different than taking a photo of your ID and storing it on your phone. Presumably the app will have some feature to assure the person viewing it that it's a legitimate document and not something someone altered in Photoshop. How the app would make that assurance was not stated in the fine article.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    7. Re:will not record the location of its user by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Look, either the government can override your OS restrictions, in which case they have root access to your phone and don't need the app, or they cannot override your OS restrictions, and denying the permissions is enough.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:will not record the location of its user by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      It's a huge problem. But given the quality of "drivers" we have today, letting drivers get away with impaired driving, vehicular homicide, etc. would be a huge problem as well. I wish I knew how to solve the one without causing the other. Freedom requires responsibility, and it only seems to take a handful of jacka**es who can't figure that out in order to detract from the freedom of everyone.

  3. So... not a drive's licence by thyristor+pt · · Score: 0

    It has nothing to do with driving or any kind of expertise needing a license. It's a digital identity card.

  4. Good idea by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    This is an excellent idea. Apps cannot be written to spoof output. Nothing could possibly go wrong.

    1. Re:Good idea by Ndymium · · Score: 1

      Just like regular cards can be? The police will query the government database for your information anyway, they don't just trust the card itself.

  5. And will it track your driving habits via GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, just what we need. A 'driver's license'app to track our speed and whereabouts via GPS in the phone. What happens to that data?

    I can see insurance companies raising rates because "the phone was in a car that was driving fast"

    or police asking for your phone and saying "the data on the phone says you were speeding. Pay the fine using your fingerprint the next time you log-in"

    NO thank you.

    1. Re: And will it track your driving habits via GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The digital driving license will not record the location of its user or serve as a tracking device"

      Learn to fucking read.

      Although you're probably right.

  6. Done this for years, works for me by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    I've done this for ages and it works for me. All my IDs are photographed and scanned into KeePass entries. If I ever don't have my wallet I pull it up on my phone. The one time I was stopped the cop puzzled on it for a few seconds, shrugged, and told me to be on my way. Since essentially every police force in the free world can look up your drivers license on their in-car computer, it's hard for them to argue that not physically holding it is so terrible anyway.

    1. Re: Done this for years, works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to argue, you do.

    2. Re:Done this for years, works for me by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      I've done this for ages and it works for me.

      Whart country are you in? It would have helped to have said.

      Since essentially every police force in the free world can look up your drivers license on their in-car computer, it's hard for them to argue that not physically holding it is so terrible anyway.

      In the UK it has never been a requirement to carry your physical driving licence when driving, although many people don't realise this. I don't - my driving licence is too valuable to have it knocking about in a pocket when I'm out. From the gov.uk website :-

      If you’re stopped, the police can ask to see your:
              driving licence
              insurance certificate
              MOT certificate
      If you don’t have these documents with you, you have 7 days to take them to a police station.

    3. Re:Done this for years, works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why have a license at all? The license is supposed to be, essentially, a receipt of having passed the driving exams (such as they might be in your location), a physical examination (normally limited to a short eyesight test), and paying any fees with it. The identification elements of the document are merely incidental to making sure that the person that took the tests and paid the fees is the same person in the driver's seat.

      A drivers license should be a document to identify a driver. It should not be used as a means to enter a bar, buy cigarettes, or board an airplane.

      I remember several times I was asked for identification and, as an experiment and for giggles, I presented a government issued identifying document other than a license to drive. About half the time the document would be refused, sometimes in violation of the law, and I could not proceed until a license to drive was presented. Presenting a license to carry a concealed weapon, or those (relatively new) passport cards, will often allow me to get into a bar or whatever without much of a second look. What bothered me though is that I presented perfectly legal identifying documents to buy a rifle and I was not allowed to complete the transfer until I came back with a state issued driver license or other DMV issued ID. The gun store was violating federal law but what kind of leverage do I have to make them comply?

      Demanding identification, and being unable to verify the document yourself, is a basic security fail. Can these electronic identifying systems fix this? That depends on how it is implemented. Right now the use of a driving license is a fail as it places trust in the individual not presenting a false document. I've seen some banks realize this, they will take your picture when opening an account and keep it on file. They don't trust a government issued ID any more. This is nice because I can now go to my bank, give my name, and the teller will see my photo and account information on his/her screen.

      If you are presenting an image on your own device as "identification" then the verification of this fails just as much as carrying a piece of plastic in your pocket. How we created a society that places such trust in these documents is quite baffling to me. Trusting electronic scans is even more baffling given the ease by which such images could be altered.

    4. Re:Done this for years, works for me by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      In my (US) state, you are not allowed to have more than one driver's license card. Why not?

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  7. Riiiiiiight... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

    The digital driving license will not record the location of its user or serve as a tracking device.

    See? It says so right on the tin. No. Really. Big Brother isn't watching. No matter what kind of Terrist/AmberAlert stuff we later proclaim, we PROMISE we won't use this to indiscriminately do whatever the fuck we feel like. Really. You can trust us. Honest.

  8. Brazil is doing this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brazil is introducing its own mobile driver's license (CNH).

  9. No way by KixWooder · · Score: 1

    I haven't been pulled over in at least ten years, but there is no way that I am every handing over my smartphone to an officer, or anyone else for that matter.

    --
    I hate fat people.
    1. Re:No way by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, the app will work as a widget on the lock screen.

      By the way, a lockscreen widget is what you want to use when you're video recording police officers, make sure your phone can still be locked when it's recording video (I'm only speaking about Android phones, I don't know if the iPhone has the same capability).

  10. It's called IC by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    " where proof of identity is required,"

    That's an identity card, as we non-US-citizens call it.

    Driving licenses are for, you guessed it, driving cars.

    Lots of people don't have driving licenses but they still get packages, buy alcohol , open a bank-account, take a flight or other stuff needing identification.

    1. Re:It's called IC by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Lots of people don't have driving licenses but they still get packages, buy alcohol , open a bank-account, take a flight or other stuff needing identification.

      In Washington state (and I imagine most other states as well), non-drivers can still go to the department of licensing and get a state ID for such purposes. Requirements are the same as getting a drivers license, excepting the driving competency parts. My daughter had one for several years, since she actually wasn’t keen on driving. We finally started encouraging her to learn to drive in her 20s.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  11. Does already exist in Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Brazil already has this in place:
    https://servicos.serpro.gov.br/cnh-digital/
    http://www.brasil.gov.br/infraestrutura/2017/07/carteira-de-habilitacao-eletronica-e-aprovada-pelo-contran
    Not all states off it already, they have until july 2018 to comply (original date was february 2018...).

    It is just a digitally signed version of the paper document, you have to register the cellphone in order for the digital document to be valid.

  12. Will strengthen Apple and Google's hand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will strengthen Apple and Google's hand when negotiating with the government. Oops, your app is violating our terms of service and will be removed from the app store and user devices. ;-)

  13. So, when a law officer asks to see your license... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... you have to turn your smartphone over to the officer and let him take it back to his vehicle to "call it in"?

  14. Moot question by N_Piper · · Score: 1

    If you are smart enough to root your phone then I would hope you are smart enough to not hand the Police your unlocked phone because obviously they are going to need to plug the phone in to verify information and obviously you don't have an expectation of privacy at that point so it doesn't matter if you've consented to a search of the phone and every account linked to it...
    Why do you think NOBODY has gone on to implement this after considering it? Even politicians know that letting an algorithm go through the phone they use to look at gay bank porn and manage their offshore twink accounts is a bad idea.

  15. Not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you hand them your phone, you give them permission to do more than just look at "your driver's license." They walk back to their car with your phone and you have no idea what they've done to it.

  16. Also happening elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Several states in Australia are piloting this also. Itâ(TM)ll be the norm before long.

  17. In the United States too by eriks · · Score: 1

    There's at least one private company [as a contractor for the state(s)] working on doing something like this in the United States. There's already a pilot program in at least one state.

    1. Re:In the United States too by kenh · · Score: 1

      My auto insurance card is on my phone - as a PDF - how is this in anyway different?

      --
      Ken
  18. Because when you get pulled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want the cop running off with your cell phone, right? I'll hand them the physical card instead, thanks.

  19. Why? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I have a driving license since 33 years.
    I was asked twice to show it. Once when a fuse burned out and my rear lights went dead, and once when I actually was a bit to fast in France on a highway (and I actually did not have the license with me ...)
    Why would I need an app? (Actually I have photos of all my important documents on my phone anyway).

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then I guess you have other ID cards?

      Because this is not just about drivers license. It's about identification. Or are you saying that no one ever wants you to identify yourself? No one asking for ID when flying, when picking up packages or signing a house lease?

  20. But he checked my ID! by blindseer · · Score: 1

    I find it completely frustrating on how much faith people put in a little piece of laminated paper. That piece of paper proves nothing.

    I tried to explain the worthlessness of a license to drive to someone, on how unless the document is verified in some way it means nothing. The guy told me of course it has value, when pulled over he feels great confidence in having the officer look at his ID card. I tried to explain to him that the officer is not checking his license, he's checking how compliant he is. Someone reluctant to hand over ID, claiming the ID was lost, or sweating profusely at handing it over will be looked at more closely. If the person hands over an ID card then the officer might actually look at some obvious errors or instance of fraud. If the photo looks even close to that of the person handing it over, and the expiration date is in the future, then the officer will often not check further.

    Again, this is not "checking the ID", this is playing a psychological game.

    If an officer was honestly checking the identity of the person then he'd have to check the government records. The ID card simply makes this a simpler process by giving the person a unique ID number, a number that correlates to the information on file.

    But this is not an app for the government to use. It's for non-government people to check, and it said so in the article. This is for things like signing for a package delivery at a store. I fully expect this app to be spoofed at some point. If people rely on this app for things like picking up prescriptions then someone is going to falsify this to get some other person's pills. Then what are they going to have? They'll have to check security cameras, rely on witness accounts, maybe they can do some signature analysis (they did get a signature, right?) or whatever else might happen in a case of identity fraud.

    Unless this app has some very complex authentication then it's a step backward. It's far easier to manipulate bits on a screen than come up with things like watermarks and other anti-fraud systems common in government issued documents.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    1. Re:But he checked my ID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Why would you make a psychical signature if you have an app? You will sign it with your Bank-ID (or similar 2-factor identity they use in Finland). A spoofed app will at best be as good as a fake ID-card. The Barcode on the back of an ID card (the one they scan today) is already hard to fake, as will the one-time (3D)barcode shown on the app be.

      And signing virtually in your phone is much more secure than any signature on paper. It's really hard for a random person to decide if a signature is real or fake. To fake the virtual signature the attacker would need to both know the code and be in possession of the crypto keys of the person they are trying to impersonate. Not impossible, but much harder than faking a signature.

  21. Wow! How revolutionary! by kenh · · Score: 1

    Please explain to me how this is in any way better than simply setting a reminder slightly shorter than the renewal date on your new driver's license and a PDF of your image on your phone.

    This is such a big nothing burger.

    --
    Ken
  22. Sohbet, Chat, Sohbet Odaları by ibo953277 · · Score: 0

    Türkiye ânin en büyük sohbet sunucusu olma adayı olan sitemizde, her alt yapımız saÄYlam adımlarla hazırlanmıÅYtır. Sitemizin kaliteli iÃerikleri ve hiÃbir yerde bulamayacaÄYınız sohbet odaları ile seviyeli, kaliteli sohbet ortamı oluÅYmaktadır. 2008 yılından beri sohbet ortamlarında bulunmuÅY birden fazla sohbet sitemizle dahada geliÅYtirmekte olduÄYumuz sistemlerimiz sayesinde yüzlerce kullanıcıya yaklaÅYmaktayız. Sunucumuza günlük giriÅYler olarak avrupa ve Türkiyeâ(TM)den giriÅYler oldukÃa yoÄYundur. Neden Biz Biz sohbet anlayıÅYını herzaman daha üstüne koymaya ÃalıÅYarak ekip arkadaÅYları seÃmekteyiz. Sohbet odalarımızda hià kimsenin sohbetinin engellenmesi iÃin ÃeÅYitli kurallarımızla seviyeli, anlayıÅYlı sohbetin mimarını Ãiziyoruz. Güzel sohbet sitemizi ziyaret ederek bu hoÅY ortamdan yararlanabilirsiniz. http://www.sohbetguzel.net/

    1. Re:Sohbet, Chat, Sohbet Odaları by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot to add the "BORK BORK BORK" to the end of your post.

      Der hooven der fluvin de bork bork bork!

    2. Re:Sohbet, Chat, Sohbet Odaları by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      You keep using these Turkish words. I don't think they mean what I think they mean.

  23. Brazil too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear editor, please check Brasil's gov website, they will we deploying the Digital Drivers License in February 2018.

    The app can also be used instead of the physical document but the gov. will still be issuing them.

    https://servicos.serpro.gov.br/cnh-digital/

  24. Unlocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great -- now they have a new reason i have to unlock my phone and hand it to them. Boo.