Slashdot Mirror


Engineering Marvel of the Winter Olympics: A Broom (nytimes.com)

Andrew Flemming and Geoff Fowler, both 29, along with their friend and business partner, Will Hamilton, 37, were pouring their creative energies into a high-tech training device the likes of which the sporting world had never seen. They were building a better broom. From a report: Not just any broom, but one that they thought could be essential to the sport of curling, which relies on the best broom handling out there as teams strategically cajole a polished granite rock across a sheet of ice. They wound up calling it the SmartBroom, and in a sport that can come across as vaguely primordial, their piece of 21st-century gadgetry could play a role in determining who wins gold at the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea.

Each SmartBroom has four sensors in the broom head that relay data to a small display unit. Hamilton took one for a spin down the ice, and the data was instantaneous -- line graphs along with a slew of numbers that showed his force in pounds and his stroke rate in hertz. Hamilton also pointed to a figure that he described as his "sweeping performance index," or S.P.I., a metric that combines power and speed in one easy-to-digest figure. Patrick Janssen, a world-class curler from Canada, has consistently registered an S.P.I. in the 2,800 range. The numbers by themselves might not mean much, Flemming said, but subtle changes in technique can lead to big differences in the quality of each stroke. And now curlers have that information at their disposal. They can experiment to see which stroke works best for them.

15 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I think in golf stuff like that is banned by klingens · · Score: 2

    My guess this stuff is irrelevant for the game at the actual olympics, except having pretty numbers and graphs for the viewers on TV.
    However it will probably totally change training in the sport.
    If you have two kinds of brooms, both handle the same, but one is smart and the other not. You use the smart one to train and learn your best techniques, you use the dumbe on when in competition. Just using this wonderbroom in competition won't do anything anyways.

  2. It's hard to see Curling as a sport by magzteel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Watching them sweeping furiously is pretty funny though.

    I want to see competitive vacuum cleaning in the summer games.

    1. Re:It's hard to see Curling as a sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Watching them sweeping furiously is pretty funny though.

      I want to see competitive vacuum cleaning in the summer games.

      For the winter olympics, I want to see competitive snow shoveling. Given that's my primary outdoor winter activity, I would find it both engaging and entertaining.

    2. Re:It's hard to see Curling as a sport by Wulf2k · · Score: 2

      I agree, lots of sports are stupid.

  3. Re:I think in golf stuff like that is banned by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bought a bicycle computer and one of the features is to track pedal cadence (pedal rpm). I went from a cadence of 45-60 and after getting the computer changed to a cadence of 85-95 and it completely changed how I bicycled. Completely different way to ride a bike, engages muscles differently etc.
     
    This is basically the same as a pedal cadence meter on a bike. Some (very expensive) cycle computers will also calculate torque applied to left and right pedals allowing you to figure out if you favor one leg.
     
    Once you watch the computer for a few weeks you can judge in your head what your cadence is within ~7 rpm for me at least. I haven't used the torque meters (they're ~$800-3000 but the price is coming down) but I would imagine I could improve my torque to closer to 50:50 L:R. Right now I bet it's closer to like 35:65 as I favor the right leg.
     
    I'm sure after a few seasons with a "trainer broom" you'll be able to calculate this within X percent of ideal. Once they figure out the ideal situation given ice temp, broom temp and broom surface, etc.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  4. As with all metrics... by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 2

    You get what you measure.

    This index score is only relevant is it can only be achieved by skilled, proper sweeping. Otherwise you are just having people train to get a high score, not to sweep properly to win. Someone with an alternative method might score very poorly on the index but do well for rock control.

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
  5. Re:S*** - two weeks of "Olympics" article are comi by bws111 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, who wants to read about people using technology to get better at what they do? We need more bitcoin articles!

  6. Re:S*** - two weeks of "Olympics" article are comi by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always turn to the sports pages first, which records people's accomplishments. The front page has nothing but man's failures.
    -- Earl Warren

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  7. Sport used to be just for fun by Big+Bipper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sport used to be something you played just for fun. Now only those competitors whose sponsors have the deepest pockets stand a chance. Sport should not require kids practicing 12 hours a day from age 6 to be competitive, and then in some sports be over the hill by their early 20s. Kids should be allowed to play sports for fun, not to become some short term corporate or national asset. Parents who permit or force their kids into such training regimens should be strung up for abuse. The Olympics haven't been about sport for a hundred years and this is just a another sign of that.

    --
    You live and learn, or you don't learn much.
    1. Re:Sport used to be just for fun by eriks · · Score: 2

      100% agree. As a card-carrying Nerd, I would like to be able to *enjoy* geeking out about sports (it's funny how many sports fans don't necessarily see it that way) but I find most professional sports rather distasteful, for the same reasons you mention: they've taken all the fun out of them with big money, forcing kids into a militaristic training regime from age 3, and to a lesser extent: the "fans", which is short for fanatics, which pretty much sums up what some of them seem like to me. If I could, I think I'd enjoy being a sport-enthusiast, but never a fanatic.

      I guess for some sports, I am exactly that, and it's even on-topic. I love curling! They're courteous (sportsmanlike!) to their opponents and the players seem to actually enjoy playing the game, and while they do take it seriously at the highest levels of competition, it's only "game serious" not "cancer serious" like many other pro sports. I hope the popularity of the sport doesn't change it's character.

    2. Re:Sport used to be just for fun by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Sport is something that people should do for fun.

      Sport is something that people should do to fulfill personal goals. That goal might be "have fun". That goal might be to lose weight and build muscle. That goal might also be "be the best at this in the world". To each his own.

  8. I once caught a match on TV, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and the team that was losing broke out the old-time straw brooms. Not because they're better in any way, but because they tend to leave debris on the ice that might mess up subsequent shots, aka 'the other team'. It was a bit controversial and the sportscasters discussed the strategy, which is how I knew what was going on. I'm guessing those old brooms have now been outlawed.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:I once caught a match on TV, by quantaman · · Score: 2

      and the team that was losing broke out the old-time straw brooms. Not because they're better in any way, but because they tend to leave debris on the ice that might mess up subsequent shots, aka 'the other team'. It was a bit controversial and the sportscasters discussed the strategy, which is how I knew what was going on. I'm guessing those old brooms have now been outlawed.

      Banned, after broomgate they severely restricted what kind of brush head you're allowed to use in competitive events.

      The fabric is a specific colour, comes from a specific manufacturer, and the broom actually has to be signed by an official.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  9. Re:I think in golf stuff like that is banned by nuckfuts · · Score: 3, Informative

    Once they figure out the ideal situation given ice temp, broom temp and broom surface, etc.

    That's the fun part of curling. There is tremendous variation in ice texture and "speed" at different times and on different sheets. And it changes continuously throughout each game as the ice is swept and worn by rocks. There will never be an ideal situation. It's up to the skip to "read" the ice and call the sweepers on and off accordingly.

  10. Re:S*** - two weeks of "Olympics" article are comi by nuckfuts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I always turn to the sports pages first, which records people's accomplishments. The front page has nothing but man's failures. -- Earl Warren

    Yes, impressive accomplishments like tossing a ball through a hoop.