Slashdot Mirror


Cryptocurrency Miners Are 'Limiting' the Search For Alien Life Now (vice.com)

Since the latest graphics processing units (GPUs) are so popular with cryptocurrency miners, the SETI project -- short for "Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence" -- can't find the graphics cards it needs to expand its operations. The SETI@home project helps provide some computing power, as it involves thousands of volunteers who turn the power of their computers over to the project, but it's only a portion of the SETI project's total computing power. Motherboard reports: Searching the stars is intense work that "uses radio telescopes to listen for narrow-bandwidth radio signals from space." Analyzing all of the data from these telescopes uses a lot of computing power. "We'd like to use the latest GPUs and we can't get 'em," Dan Werthimer, chief scientist of SETI, told the BBC. "That's limiting our search for extraterrestrials." Manufacturers such as Nvidia are struggling to keep up with demand for graphics cards. It recently told investors it would rise to meet its manufacturing challenge while focusing on its core market -- gamers. It even suggested vendors limit purchases of graphics cards from individual buyers in an effort to stop miners from buying up all the cards. "This is a new problem, it's only happened on orders we've been trying to make in the last couple of months," Werthimer told the BBC. "We've got the money, we've contacted the vendors, and they say, 'we just don't have them.'"

135 comments

  1. Simple solution by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We've got the money, we've contacted the vendors, and they say, 'we just don't have them.'"

    Offer more money and more hardware will get manufactured.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Simple solution by jrumney · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately they only take bitcoin

    2. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's a solution to both problems: make a cryptocurrency where the work product is some large quantity of SETI search. Here's an idea for a name...

      Star...

      (hmm, what indication of money can we think of ? Ah that's it)

      ...bucks

      Yeah! We'll mine for Starbucks. Surely that name isn't taken :)

    3. Re:Simple solution by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Offer more money and more hardware will get manufactured.

      Well, why aren't the manufacturers investing in new factories to increase capacity? Probably because they see the current high demand as a passing fad, and that demand for their cards will return to normal levels after the bubble burst. They don't want to get stuck with a big new factory, when no one is buying cards for mining any more.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offer more money and more hardware will get manufactured.

      Well, why aren't the manufacturers investing in new factories to increase capacity? Probably because they see the current high demand as a passing fad, and that demand for their cards will return to normal levels after the bubble burst. They don't want to get stuck with a big new factory, when no one is buying cards for mining any more.

      Nvidia has pretty much said this themselves.

    5. Re:Simple solution by mysidia · · Score: 2

      There's a simple economical solution.... INCREASE THE PRICE the graphics cards will be sold at from the manufacturer until the excessive demand is suppressed down to the level of the supply.
      If the SETI work is more important than the crypto mining work, then they should be able to justify paying more per graphics card than the miners, thus the GPU power will go to SETI. ALTHOUGH as I see it NEITHER the miners nor SETI are the "intended" audience for those products ---- ultimately they're meant for consumer gamers, BUT if consumer gamers aren't willing to pay the top dollar plus premium due to the supply shortage, then those cards should go to whoever can justify paying the most for them, instead.

      The additional money coming in can be used to fund more manufacturing infrastructure, which should mean that the supply shortage gets rectified.

    6. Re:Simple solution by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Nvidia has pretty much said this

      NVidia is EXTREMELY shortsighted if they believe the demand for their cards caused by Cryptomining and other compute applications is a temporary fad.

      People have been buying GPUs for mining since 2009, and it's been ramping up over the past few years --- the name for something lasting almost a decade that only seems to be growing is not a fad.

      In the future better decentralized cryptos should also likely spur MORE demand for GPUs not less; not to mention the demand for GPUs for research, deep-learning, and scientific applications such as SETI's.

      Plain and simple... GPU makers have materially FAILED to (1) Create sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet demand, AND (2) To sufficiently increase the price of their products in response to shortages.

      These are some serious failures that their investors should be quite pissed about -- as they're leaving money on the table now, and in the future ----- AND there is a big fat opening for a competitor that you could drive a truck through, if you only have the resources to develop and manufacture a competing GPU....... frankly, AMD and Intel have screwed up there by failing to capitalize as well.

    7. Re:Simple solution by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Yeah! We'll mine for Starbucks. Surely that name isn't taken :)

      You need to drink a cup of coffee to clear your mind. Starbucks is a name already taken. It was a major character in Battlestar Galactica. I don't think the show owners would like you mining for any of their characters.

      I'm pretty sure if you get sign off from the owners of that show though the name is not used anywhere else.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star... Bucks... Starbucks.

      I dunno... Sounds like something that would be overpriced crap.

    9. Re:Simple solution by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Why unfortunately? That means that graphics cards are getting cheaper and not more expensive at the moment!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The pointless search for nonexistent intelligences is one of the biggest white whales in history. Or is that white elephant? I always forget...

    11. Re:Simple solution by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can get Slashdot to give them a GPU every time they repost this story. So far, they would owe them two.

    12. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn, lay off the Kool Aid.

    13. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine Intel, AMD, and Nvidia all failed to capitalize on your insight because they are hobbled by their practice of hiring of intelligent people.

    14. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should make the aliens pay for the SETI hardware.

    15. Re:Simple solution by acastanza · · Score: 1

      I don't give a shit about cryptocurrency, but mysidia is abolutely right about the demand for GPUs for research, deep-learning, and scientific applications. Crypto could completely die out (I don't think it will, but also, don't care either way) and the scientific applications will still be growing to make their investments in production capacity worthwhile. Nvidia is *definitely* being short-sighted by not dramatically scaling their manufacturing capacity.

    16. Re:Simple solution by acastanza · · Score: 1

      Right... because scientific endeavors can totally afford to scale up budgets dramatically just because one special interest drove up prices to astronomical levels. That's totally how budgets applied for years in advance work... /s

    17. Re: Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That solution is already active but called gridcoin.

    18. Re:Simple solution by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      But they already paid for the Great GRB Wall, they don't have any money left.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    19. Re: Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do care about that market, they have been making cards for that market for years. What they don't believe in is the cryptocoin bubble being something sustainable.

      They will continue to grow at what they believe is a sustainable rate not over leverage themselves and be mired in overwhelming debt when the cryptocoin market gets back to normal and demand dries up.

    20. Re:Simple solution by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      This is a popular misunderstanding. In reality, no amount of money will design and construct a factory in short term. These are long-term commitments. This is especially true for very sensitive equipment like GPU dies and memory dies.

      Building more production capacity is a function of both resources AND time. Cryptocurrency boom has only lasted a few months. Even a very optimistic estimation of construction speed of a factory capable of producing GPUs and memory for them is measured in years.

    21. Re:Simple solution by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing. It's not nVidia or AMD. They only build the chips. Moreover, they CAN and WOULD ramp up their chip productions, provided the integrators (AIB cards) ask for them... which they don't. I'm talking about ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, EVGA, Sapphire (for AMD cards), etc. - these are the ones who won't ramp up productions, and paradoxically they are right as well.

      Manufacturing process ain't willy-nilly making a card. It's a complex process involving a multitude of vendors, component providers and logistics. For example ASUS could find themselves holding thousands of GP-10x chips and not enough VRAM to build the cards, because Apple is buying 20% of all vNAND production every year. And guess where GDDR5(x) memory is being produced? Well, in the same fabs that make phone memory (Samsung, Micron, Hynix). There's also the logistics issue. Cards are being shipped by boat; it might take up to 90 days (usually 60+) for the cards to reach the regional warehouses, and another week or so to physically get in stores.

      The point is you're blaming the wrong parties.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    22. Re:Simple solution by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Which results in severe long term contraction of their main market, and after crypto boom ends, long term contraction for the company itself.

    23. Re:Simple solution by war4peace · · Score: 1

      astronomical levels

      Hmm... I guess SETI should be used to that.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    24. Re:Simple solution by PixelPusher1532 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. Random price increases / decreases happen all the time. All businesses have to deal with them. Smart businesses plan for them. Every farmer worth his salt knows that sometime in the next five years the price of diesel will shoot up for some reason. In another year the price of the grain he is selling will fall for some reason. He may not know what year or what budget item will cause him trouble, but he will budget for SOMETHING to go wrong.

      Should't the people writing budgets for scientific projects be smart enough to add some margin, just like everyone else does?

    25. Re:Simple solution by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      If the SETI work is more important than the crypto mining work, then they should be able to justify paying more per graphics card than the miners, thus the GPU power will go to SETI.

      There is no point in doing any SETI right now. The Aliens are not broadcasting anything for us to hear.

      They are too busy mining and trading Cryptocoins, like everyone else. Aliens aren't stupid and are convinced that they will be able to predict the bubble collapse, and get out in time with a tidy profit.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    26. Re: Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens Are 'Limiting' the Search For Cryptocurrency Miners Life Now

    27. Re:Simple solution by mysidia · · Score: 1

      scientific endeavors can totally afford to scale up budgets dramatically just because one special interest drove up prices

      Naw.... prices go up for a healthy reason: the manufacturer is able to sell every unit they can make, And there's demand for more than they can make, therefore buyers have to compete a bit.

      Sure it is ashame now that there's no untapped super-inexpensive surplus of computing power in GPUs to be had at basement bargain rates anymore; enabling these projects to tap a mass market commodity, instead of building their own supercomputers ---- But you know what? Graphics cards for PCs were Never intended for use by scientific projects like SETI -- these projects are actually Part of the Problem, just like the deep learning folks using consumer GPUs are -- these are among companies buying up the hardware made for the market of PC gamers which is a small market, And
        the reason they buy is to exploit the low prices consumers are willing to pay for these ----- instead of purchasing the higher-end cards like nVidia Tesla that are intended for the scientific and commercial applications.

      But that is entirely what people should expect --- as GPU-based computing goes more and more mainstream with more and more applications, demand will be squinched, until the manufacturer makes more or finds a way to segment the market by crippling the consumer GPUs from running Scientific, machine-learning, and Coin Mining applications, and actually force them into buying the GPUs that are priced suitably high (or Comparable to CPUs) for the capabilities offered.

  2. Fermi Paradox - by sheramil · · Score: 3, Funny

    - answered. They're all too busy mining cryptocurrency. Good lord! Charles Stross was right!

  3. SETI even more useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow

    1. Re:SETI even more useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more useless than mining "crypto" currency.

  4. Echo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crypto-currency Craze 'Hinders Search For Alien Life'
    Posted by msmash on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @01:10PM from the demand-and-supply dept.

  5. Duplicate content by Matt_H · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a duplicate of this story

    1. Re:Duplicate content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. With postchain tech and proof-of-work, there can't be duplicate stories. However no one will know who authored or read the articles.

    2. Re:Duplicate content by RabidTimmy · · Score: 1

      Cryptocurrency Miners are Limiting the Search for Dupes Now.

  6. Re:competition... by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree about cryptocurrency, but I fail to understand why you think that discovering signs of aliens would be no use to humanity. Sure, its not going to affect you on a day to day basic, but it means life has arisen elsewhere and this in turn will influence scientific thoughts about biology and its origins. A lot of science is blue sky research that may lead nowhere, that doesn't make it pointless.

  7. Use FPGA boards instead? by randomErr · · Score: 3

    There are a ton of cheap FPGA boards left out there that were used for Bitcoin mining. Why not repurpose them? I can pick a decent one on Ebay for $60-100.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Use FPGA boards instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you give examples? The key issue for mining vs science/graphics is that pcie bandwidth doesn't matter. In bitcoin mining, you have little source data and little need for memory and a complex brute force problem. Any FPGA system based on low bandwidth and/or low memory capacity is unlikely to be useful for science.

    2. Re:Use FPGA boards instead? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      There are a ton of cheap FPGA boards left out there that were used for Bitcoin mining. Why not repurpose them? I can pick a decent one on Ebay for $60-100.

      Can you repurpose them for the kind of processing that is heavy in floating point math, Fourier transforms and I/O? Bitcoin mining on FPGAs made sense because it was a relatively simple integer operation with embarrassingly little I/O. My hunch is that SETI processing on FPGAs is not cost-effective, since GPUs are so much better for the kind of math and memory access.

      This reminds me of early discussions on FPGA miners with other algos such as Scrypt, which is memory-hard, so if you're developing a custom chip, you'll end up with something that looks like a GPU in terms of memory. The Scrypt ASICs that eventually came out are only sensible because the algo can trade memory hardness for extra computation.

      (Disclaimer: I co-developed the first opensource FPGA Bitcoin miners.)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Use FPGA boards instead? by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Why not use both and mine twice as much?

    4. Re:Use FPGA boards instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a ton of cheap FPGA boards left out there that were used for Bitcoin mining. Why not repurpose them? I can pick a decent one on Ebay for $60-100.

      Can you repurpose them for the kind of processing that is heavy in floating point math, Fourier transforms and I/O? Bitcoin mining on FPGAs made sense because it was a relatively simple integer operation with embarrassingly little I/O. My hunch is that SETI processing on FPGAs is not cost-effective, since GPUs are so much better for the kind of math and memory access.

      This reminds me of early discussions on FPGA miners with other algos such as Scrypt, which is memory-hard, so if you're developing a custom chip, you'll end up with something that looks like a GPU in terms of memory. The Scrypt ASICs that eventually came out are only sensible because the algo can trade memory hardness for extra computation.

      (Disclaimer: I co-developed the first opensource FPGA Bitcoin miners.)

      Your scenario sounds like a job for a dsp

  8. BeauHD is a moron by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The other post is still on the front page. I know it's too much to ask 'editors' to check in the archives that a story hasn't been posted, but not even reading the front page of the site that you're working for? Why is BeauHD still employed?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:BeauHD is a moron by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      He must be running out of Net Neutrality news to push.

    2. Re:BeauHD is a moron by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you limit your pool of applicants to those who will pass a drug test, you wind up having to take any gibbering idiot who will come along — usually some kind of evangelical, and those people are universally batshit insane.

      I don't use illegal and/or non-prescribed drugs and I am neither evangelical nor batshit insane. I do think that people who use illegal and/or non-prescribed drugs are personally and mentally weak. If you can't deal with your life without using drugs, there is something wrong with you and your life and you should change yourself and/or your life. Grow the fuck up and take responsibility for your problems instead of hiding in drug induced stupor.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:BeauHD is a moron by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      The other post is still on the front page. I know it's too much to ask 'editors' to check in the archives that a story hasn't been posted, but not even reading the front page of the site that you're working for? Why is BeauHD still employed?

      I demand a refund!

      (Actually, I agree with you; just meeting my snark quota.)

    4. Re:BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is BeauHD still employed?

      I ask this question (with obvious variation) literally everywhere I go. I think the answer is drug testing. When you limit your pool of applicants to those who will pass a drug test, you wind up having to take any gibbering idiot who will come along — usually some kind of evangelical, and those people are universally batshit insane. No matter where I go, I see people who are unqualified to tie their fucking shoes working in a service industry, while thousands of people with a clue can't even get a job.

      I submit as evidence the post office. They are all bad, but my local main post office has literally one employee with skills and a work ethic, and who doesn't act like a total ass when you come in. Everyone else gives not one fuck about you, barely knows what they are doing, and will give you stink face when you walk in. I have literally watched the postmaster jaw-jack loudly when the line was over ten people deep, distracting the employees actually trying to help people. Their latest employee looks put out to have to work every. single. time. But she can pass a drug test!

      What. The. Fuck.

      Started off with prejudiced bullshit, then used that to try and claim that's the reason USPS employees suck.

      Got the stones to answer this: Do USPS employess belong to a union?

      Yeah, that'll fly right in the face of your world view, so you won't even address that, will you? When USPS employee unions likely hava a helluva lot more correlation with crappy USPS employees than some rectally-sourced close-minded bullshit link between drug testing employees and evangelical Christians.

      So no, you have no stones.

      And I'm not surprised.

    5. Re:BeauHD is a moron by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      And I think people who use illegal drugs, live in the wrong country or state.
      They should move to a state where the drugs are legal or can be prescribed to adicts.

      The rest of your post only shows what an uneducated moron you are.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:BeauHD is a moron by gnick · · Score: 4, Informative

      I do think that people who use illegal and/or non-prescribed drugs are personally and mentally weak.

      Square. Anyone who didn't try pot in college is someone I don't understand. And for the people who tried it and decided it improved their quality of life? Toke on, laws be damned. Maybe when I need someone to judge me I'll visit your mountaintop.

      If you can't deal with your life without using drugs, there is something wrong with you...

      I won't entirely disagree, but that does imply that there's "something wrong" with just about everybody. A perfectly healthy body shouldn't NEED aspirin. It should produce everything it needs. But, aspirin's good for some people. Some people just find their morning more pleasant with a cup of coffee or a cigarette. Caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, THC, Prozac, Lipitor, cocaine, Viagra, Xanax, these are all drugs that enjoy popularity. Sugar's kind of on the fence and factors in heavily to the average American diet. Maybe when you said "drugs" you meant the "drugs D.A.R.E. warned me about", but drugs is drugs. The fact that the fed classifies pot as more dangerous than coke should tell you they don't know WTF they're talking about.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    7. Re:BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about caffeine, alcohol and sugar? Do you partake in any of those mind altering, addictive substances?

    8. Re:BeauHD is a moron by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So no, you have no stones.

      You don't get to even talk about courage as long as you're too cowardly to log into Slashdot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So no, you have no stones.

      You don't get to even talk about courage as long as you're too cowardly to log into Slashdot.

      Ahhh, ad hominem bullshit.

      One laughable refuge of the logically-challenged.

      Especially those with no stones.

      The worst thing is, you probably believe you're smart.

      But you can't even make a logical argument. Really? USPS service sucks because they drug-test employees and therefore have to hire evangelical Christians, who are "universally batshit insane"?? That's really just about the stupidest shit I've ever seen posted on Slashdot. Close-minded stupidity and prejudice all rolled into one totally whacked conspiracy theory. What fucking color is the sky on your planet?

      You're dumber than a box of rocks.

    10. Re: BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: medical marijauna

    11. Re:BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever taken an Advil in your life you're basically just a huge pussy and you really need to toughen the fuck up

      It really makes you think.

    12. Re:BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'I do think that people who use illegal and/or non-prescribed drugs are personally and mentally weak.'

      I hope you one day have to suffer only a 1/10th as much as I do, so your mental faculties will be clear enough for you to remember this moment.

      Nanny-State fascists like you deserve to die for the suffering you impose upon people like me. I have a degenerative spinal cord disease which in addition to ultimately killing me, leaves me in more and more increasing amounts of pain every day that I am alive, but because society says 'oh you should be able to deal' I am condemned to a life of torture.

      How about I come to your house, pour hot acid all over your body and say 'you should just deal'

      You are a piece of shit.

    13. Re:BeauHD is a moron by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So no, you have no stones.

      You don't get to even talk about courage as long as you're too cowardly to log into Slashdot.

      Ahhh, ad hominem bullshit.

      Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. Run along, child. I'm not playing your little game. Log in or piss off.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:BeauHD is a moron by Theils+Blood+Boy · · Score: 1

      You sound like a blast to be around! I know I'd hire someone like you knowing I'd get to enjoy their lovely personality five days a week.

    15. Re:BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So no, you have no stones.

      You don't get to even talk about courage as long as you're too cowardly to log into Slashdot.

      Ahhh, ad hominem bullshit.

      Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. Run along, child. I'm not playing your little game. Log in or piss off.

      Nope, no brains.

      I need to go apologize to that box of rocks.

    16. Re: BeauHD is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet it's not too hard to tell if someone was a pothead in college about ten years later. Can't do that with coke, coffee, and lots of other things.

      So yes, cannabis is more harmful than coke, and you're stupid, or spreading fake "facts", not sure which.

      Ps I'm Dutch, so don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.
      When I grew up, they said that too, now they know a lot more about the neurological long term effects...

      aRTee

    17. Re: BeauHD is a moron by gnick · · Score: 1

      Yet it's not too hard to tell if someone was a pothead in college about ten years later.

      It's not too hard to spot the kids that are GOING TO BE potheads either. Cannabis must be REALLY bad when it's getting to the kids that haven't even tried it.

      Ps I'm Dutch, so don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.

      Congratulations on being Dutch. You don't know what you're talking about.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  9. Re:competition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's entirely possible that such a discovery could be extremely useful to humanity. Suppose we detect some stream of data being transmitted that contains huge amounts of information about an advanced civilization. Might give us an insight into technological advances not yet thought of.

  10. Narrow bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should aliens pack their information into narrow bandwidth signals?
    Isn't that just an artifact of how *we* conceived radio roughly 100 years ago?
    Perhaps to them some signal extremely spread over spectrum would make more sense. Granted, detectors and "demodulators" would have to look radically different than ours do, but just imagine an extremely wide wavelet modulation and a fractal active antenna or something...

  11. SETIcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Create a cryptocurency SETIcoin, where the miners has to search aliens in order to get coins.

    1. Re:SETIcoin by xonen · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Create a cryptocurency SETIcoin, where the miners has to search aliens in order to get coins.

      There are those days i wish i had modpoints. Not often, but today is one.

      --
      A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
  12. Trump tweets:"There are good people on both sides" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... (hot mic) "And am I glad this happened. I get the press off my case for a few days."

  13. There are no Aliens by MrKaos · · Score: 0

    Everybody *knows* that with absolute certainty and no doubt at all so we should close down SETI because we all know it serves no purpose and never will.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:There are no Aliens by Rande · · Score: 1

      Oh, there almost certain are aliens somewhere in the universe. However, the chances to them being anywhere even vaguely close to Earth is practically nil, and even if they were, if they are smart enough to overcome the incredible vastness of interstellar space...they are smart enough to not come here.
      So yes, SETI in it's current form is mostly a waste.

    2. Re:There are no Aliens by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, there almost certain are aliens somewhere in the universe. However, the chances to them being anywhere even vaguely close to Earth is practically nil, and even if they were,

      That's right. If they were already here for 10's maybe of hundreds of thousands of years we would know. I mean it would be just like if we were hiding in the bush observing wild animals. We would know that a species 10,'s of thousands of years ahead of us would not be able to hide from us, there would be strange signs everywhere. We would know.

      Besides, our governments would tell us immediately that aliens were here and give up the power they have over us. Plus the elite would want to give up their positions of power over us so that we could all live together in peace, hold hands and sing kom-by-yah. Personally, I'd spent more time on the beach. I'd probably keep coding if I could. I wonder what sort of computers aliens would have?

      if they are smart enough to overcome the incredible vastness of interstellar space...they are smart enough to not come here.

      For sure. Earth would be the top selling reality TV show amongst the races in the galaxy. Imagine the cheesy announcer voice saying ToNight On EAAAARRRRRTTTTTHHHHHHH..... Watch these crazy primates choose between two equally crazy candidates to control the.largest.super.power.ever (they think). The insanity of these barley evolved chimps with powers over the atom to destroy .E.V.E.R.Y.T.H.I.N.G. is palpitation inducing. WILL THEY EVER LEARN???

      So yes, SETI in it's current form is mostly a waste.

      It is unknowable. Even if Aliens wanted us to know, our governments have a pretty large dragnet of technology to control us with. None of us plebs walking around our cities and towns know anything more than we've been told and most of us are too apathetic and insular to even look up from our phones to whatever truth is supposedly out there. Maybe this is all we're evolved enough to handle and we'd be dangerous with anything more powerful than what we have.

      But hey, may as well laugh at the absurdity of it all :)

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:There are no Aliens by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Everybody *knows* that with absolute certainty and no doubt at all so we should close down SETI because we all know it serves no purpose and never will.

      There's a good chance that there are aliens out there somewhere. Maybe not advanced aliens in our part of the galaxy though. If we ever detect any through their use of radio waves though they'll probably be extinct by the time we receive their radio waves.

      If aliens exist in the galaxy, it would probably be smart as a species NOT to let your presence be known. If as a species you're still using radio waves- it is perhaps best to disguise those waves from being broadcast into space (if that's possible).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:There are no Aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody *knows* that with absolute certainty and no doubt at all so we should close down SETI because we all know it serves no purpose and never will.

      There are lots of aliens, they're coming in over the southern border. They mostly come at night... Mostly...

    5. Re:There are no Aliens by supremebob · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I have to wonder what's a bigger waste of energy... looking for broadcasts from aliens that are probably too far away to reach us, or minting Internet funny money for drug dealers.

    6. Re:There are no Aliens by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      If aliens exist in the galaxy, it would probably be smart as a species NOT to let your presence be known. If as a species you're still using radio waves- it is perhaps best to disguise those waves from being broadcast into space (if that's possible).

      Not too long ago, the U.S. government's official position was that if we receive any kind of message from an extraterrestrial species, we would pretend not to have gotten it and not respond. I don't know if that's still the official position.

    7. Re:There are no Aliens by Boronx · · Score: 1

      You think animals don't know humans exist?

    8. Re:There are no Aliens by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      If aliens exist in the galaxy, it would probably be smart as a species NOT to let your presence be known. If as a species you're still using radio waves- it is perhaps best to disguise those waves from being broadcast into space (if that's possible).

      Indeed, this is probably on of the greatest achievements of the internet.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    9. Re:There are no Aliens by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      You think animals don't know humans exist?

      Whenever an animal is looking at you they are saying to themselves "no, no, no, no omnipotent species staring right back at me, doesn't exist, figment of my imagination", just like we do. That's exactly what I didn't say.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    10. Re:There are no Aliens by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Not too long ago, the U.S. government's official position was that if we receive any kind of message from an extraterrestrial species, we would pretend not to have gotten it and not respond.

      Thank goodness we have the government to protect and comfort us, we are so fortunate.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  14. Re:competition... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    It would be nice to think that, but we have enough trouble decoding stuff written in unknown languages by ancient humans and they thought it the same way and had the same concepts about the world as us. I suspect trying to decode something sent by aliens would be orders of magnitude harder.

  15. No need for SETI by umghhh · · Score: 1

    because aliens have already been found - they populate most of the political scene in the West. Wherever you look - Obama, Trump, Junckers etc These alien parasites destroy our countries and nobody cares. That is a much bigger problem. Come to think of it: contrary to what SETI is, political elite being all aliens is an actual problem.

    1. Re:No need for SETI by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Crab people?

  16. Re:competition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can even identify it, right? Seems a bit like ants suddenly discovering how to read English. And even that requires having an awareness and understanding of "meaningful concepts", let alone those from a human context. Unless we receive a signal from a relatively evenly-matched civilization in terms of advancement, it's likely we won't even be aware it occurred at all.

  17. In the future.... by Rande · · Score: 1

    People will rent out part of their brain to mine cryptocurrencies as it will be one of the last jobs remaining for unskilled workers.
    The really poor will rent out so much that they don't understand any longer how badly they are done by.

    1. Re:In the future.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future is now!
      I have millions of slashcoins. Wonder what I'll spend them on...

    2. Re:In the future.... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      You know... mix that with the original Matrix concept of using human brains as processors and you'd have a decent premise for a sci-fi movie.

      Especially that last part about the poor, but I'd also add in the uber-rich being augmented with 'cloud' processing they can skim from their poor workforce.

      Then you need the poor guy/gal who gets disconnected - losing their only income - and ends up figuring out how to use their natural brain capacity to take down the system and save everyone.

      There's a script in there. Maybe even a good one, if a bit derivative.

    3. Re:In the future.... by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      You know... mix that with the original Matrix concept of using human brains as processors and you'd have a decent premise for a sci-fi movie.

      Especially that last part about the poor, but I'd also add in the uber-rich being augmented with 'cloud' processing they can skim from their poor workforce.

      Then you need the poor guy/gal who gets disconnected - losing their only income - and ends up figuring out how to use their natural brain capacity to take down the system and save everyone.

      There's a script in there. Maybe even a good one, if a bit derivative.

      Wasn't that essentially the plot of Johnny Mnemonic?

    4. Re:In the future.... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >Wasn't that essentially the plot of Johnny Mnemonic?

      I wouldn't say that - it was a dystopian high/low tech future, but Johnny was a data courier with a kink bomb in his head, not a co-processor. And there wasn't any significant exploration of what that kind of tech would do to people, it was more a simple action movie in a weird setting.

    5. Re:In the future.... by VanessaE · · Score: 1

      Turn in your geek card - human beings were being used in whole as a massive, distributed power supply, not for processing power.

    6. Re:In the future.... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Turn in yours. That was the change they made when the studio insisted that it was too complicated for moviegoers to understand.

  18. This is the 'flaw' in bitcoin mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't do any good for anyone else..
    I've often thought it needs a tax, not for the tax man or the government etc but a do something useful tax, like a 25% gpu power lent to seti or computational chemistry etc Actually do something good for the planet.

     

    1. Re: This is the 'flaw' in bitcoin mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the most socialist thing I've ever heard.

    2. Re: This is the 'flaw' in bitcoin mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with socialism? Do you really think that 1000 years into the future when they have flying cars that they will still be practicing dog eat dog capitalism and buying health insurance?

  19. Waste of GPUs... by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could be used to process the incredibly large number of stories on Slashdot to detect dupes instead.

  20. Good by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Searching for "alien life" is probably one of the most useless human activities ever invented. I hate to have to say this, but we are the Universe asking itself what it is, and I seriously doubt that the Universe has multiple personalities asking the same question.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
    1. Re:Good by azrael29a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Searching for "alien life" is probably one of the most useless human activities ever invented.

      Yeah, right, because computing hashes of transactions of essentially worthless virtual money (or money-wannabe) is so much better.

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well it is more profitable then looking for aliens. And some (sia) seve ralwold functons bu you stick your head in the sand and ignor the reality.

    3. Re:Good by azcoyote · · Score: 1

      Good point. Who gives all this money to SETI anyway? How about this: SETI should just give up and goes back to watching old episodes of the original Star Trek. Then they can give their leftover money to the crypto-currency miners, so that way they can pay for the next WoW expansion without wasting all that electricity. And then maybe that will hinder global warming just enough so that when the aliens do come to kill us all, we will still be alive to enjoy it...

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    4. Re:Good by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that the Universe has multiple personalities asking the same question.

      Good point, it would be absurd for more than one intelligent being to exist. I exist, therefore you don't. Nor are there any other kinds of intelligences on Earth like dolphins or birds or elephants, nor do any of the googols of habitable planets out there have any kind of intelligent life on them.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    5. Re:Good by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Searching for "alien life" is probably one of the most useless human activities ever invented.

      It's only useless if we never find any, and never is a long time.

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded? Your post makes it look like it.

      Fuck profit. Coins are a scam. You're a loser. Go fuck yourself you twat.

  21. Nobody reads slashdot anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even the editors.

  22. Temporary setback by scourfish · · Score: 1

    Nvidia is working on releasing headless mining cards to curb the price gouging on current GPU's, and most of the naive people who are eventually going to give up once they realize that their 12 GPU rig they paid $15,000 for isn't going to make them fast money. * With the current GPU prices, I'd say you have a better chance of making some money buying Nvidia stock.

    1. Re:Temporary setback by iTrawl · · Score: 1

      Citation needed, because as I see it the only thing the GPU makes can do is up production. That function tends to infinity though. The more they make, the more the miners buy, the more the price goes up, the more the price of crypto is inflated, go to 10.

      Because unless the headless cards are priced the same the miners will just buy the cheaper one. And if that cheaper one is a full video card, guess who now has boatloads of headless stock nobody wants (alternatively, there is _still_ a shortage of video cards). And if they're priced the same, then just use the increased production capacity to build full cards anyway. Even when priced the same, the miners might still buy the full cards because they can be sold again later (even if it's after the crash and it's at a fraction of the purchase price), while a video card without an output is pretty much worthless outside of mining - maybe SETI would buy them at a fraction of the price, or just offer to take them off your hands.

      Short of selling pre-built mining rigs - thus saving the need to research on how to build one, I don't see how headless cards would help in any way.

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  23. Time for realism here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say I have a GPU farm, and energy to spare. I can run packets for SETI, which means zero return, or I can mine a cryptocurrency, which only is going up in value, where exponential growth is pretty much guaranteed, and if there is a correction, it goes back up (BTC was in the 8k range yesterday, now should be going over the five digit mark today.)

    With the fact that people are using BTC as a store of value because fiat currencies can't be trusted (just wait until the Petro-yuan goes live), it only is going to go up. There are no more Bitcoins being added, and demand will always be high, so what shifts between 8-20k today will be shifting between 250k-300k in a year.

    If it means exponential return rates, fuck the alien signals.

  24. So true by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


    We just don't find so many aliens these days, 'cause of all the crypto mining.

    But seriously...for all we know all our searching is messing alien navigation systems and killing them off.

    More important the search for alien life over GPU number crunching will only become more likely with crypto. Older GPUs less capable of keeping up with mining difficulty will become a second-hand bargain.

    No one is stopping people from dedicating resources to the unlikely pursuit of searching for aliens as opposed to having a calculated return.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  25. The worst part by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Now we have to watch out, aliens could come to Earth undetected and mine all our cryptocurrency.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:The worst part by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Now we have to watch out, aliens could come to Earth undetected and mine all our cryptocurrency.

      HEY! mining cryptocurrency is OUR job. I don't want no stinking aliens stealing our jobs.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  26. Short term loss, long term gain by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

    With a delay of year or two there will be an excess of cheap used GPU-s, overall the alien searchers can get more computed even if it means delay of 1-2 years. For a long term project like that, such a delay doesn't really matter.

    1. Re:Short term loss, long term gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used, half burned-out GPUs...
      If something's been run in a mining rig until it can no longer handle calculations competitively or cost effectively, what good is it as a used device?

  27. Be careful what you wish for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought people decided not to look too hard anymore after John Hurt found those eggs on LV-426.

  28. Dupe by williamyf · · Score: 1
    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  29. Better head: 'Crypto-currency crazies save Earth' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SETI isn't merely a waste of time which fortunately is incredibly unlikely to find any aliens even if they do exist. If SETI succeeds, it's a serious threat to the existence of Humanity as we know it:

    As soon as an alien contact will be found, no embargo would hold - every crazed nut will broadcast to the aliens. Eventually, someone would annoy the aliens or accidentally contact the universe's bad guys, and then we're done for.

  30. Patently False by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If SETI@Home were to build a DAPP, then SETI@Home could run on the ethereum blockchain.

  31. Taken [Re:Simple solution] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

    Yeah! We'll mine for Starbucks. Surely that name isn't taken :)

    You need to drink a cup of coffee to clear your mind. Starbucks is a name already taken. It was a major character in Battlestar Galactica.

    You spelled "Moby Dick" wrong.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Taken [Re:Simple solution] by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Wrong, it was Luke Starbuckster.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Taken [Re:Simple solution] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However "Moby Dick"'s copyright has expired. Not Galactica's ;-)

  32. Re:competition... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    The big difference is that anything sent by aliens would be meant for us to understand. The problem with ancient human languages is we only have fragments and they weren't talking to us so they didn't try to leave us any clues. Also all we have is written words of ancient humans, whereas aliens would likely send us video, which makes the rest of the learning pretty easy (once you figure out how they encoded the video, which they will attempt to convey).

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  33. News Headlines by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Russian Hackers Are Aliens. SETI and Bitcoin Unite Forces!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:News Headlines by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I still remember F-Secure's Hyppönen's joke.

      "Not all hackers are Russians. Some are Ukrainians".

      Granted he's actually talking about private criminal enterprises, and not the state actor hacking BS story that keeps on rumbling in certain circles.

    2. Re:News Headlines by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      That various nations are operating or funding cyber warfare groups is hardly a secret and hardly BS. Russia, the US and China are known to do this. Now pinning any particular hacks on these state actors is extremely difficult. Russia funding hacking of US elections? plausible theory, but finding proof is going to be difficult, if the US even were to declassify any proof they do find. It's a topic that a layperson can't be expected to discuss with any amount of certainty.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  34. Cryto-SETI Hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not an expert here, but there seems to be a ready made way to mash the cryto frenzy with the needs of the scientific community. For every "hit" on a point of interest by a distributed network of mining cards, give the hitter a fancy new digital coin. "SETI-coin" can be the new craze and actually use the processing power to use, instead of just burning it on worthless calculations.

  35. Alternate thought by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Add a financial " prize " for computing X number of cycles or blocks in the SETI project and folks will be more than happy to help you out.
    ( assuming your prize >= crypto currency mining )

  36. Not in my lifetime, and not in yours either by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    I'm all for SETI. I've supported them in the past, I've contributed dollars and cycles and time and effort.

    But there's absolutely zero chance that SETI can produce any return to anyone alive today.

    Even if tomorrow, SETI discovers a guaranteed civilization, identical to ours, it would change absolutely nothing in our lives.
    How many decades will it take to say "hi" back? Let alone get any real response of value.

    Between language barriers, distance barriers, culture barriers, and who knows what other barriers, I'd wager it'll take twenty years just to get a mutually confirmed "we both exist". Make that fifty years before we get anything fun, like digital artwork. Make that at least two hundred years before we get anything physical. Call it 150 years with technological improvements over time. Call it 125 years if we meet them half-way.

    In any event, I'm long dead, you're long dead, and it didn't matter to begin with.

    SETI's a great goal, and a wonderful effort, and it isn't worth supplanting literally ANYTHING else, no matter how trivial.

  37. We won't find ETs, and here's why: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    The ETs have been monitoring our electromagnetic communications since we discovered how to communicate that way.
    During some decades since then, they've been encouraged at our progress (civil rights movement, for instance -- even if that was offset by the Vietnam 'war').
    But since January 2016, they've seen we've moved backwards by leaps and bounds, back towards a new Dark Age -- and they are disappointed in us, now.
    As a result, they'll continue to hide from us, cloak their own electromagnetic emissions, so we can't determine if they exist or not.
    If we keep this negative progress up, they may just build their own 'wall', to prevent us from escaping our solar system and infecting the rest of our galaxy.
    So, for now, there is no point in searching for ET; they don't want to be found, not by violent, wilfully ignorant cavemen such as ourselves.

  38. SETI power consumption by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    Got into a debate with my brother about crypto currencies. He was appalled about how much power they use globally. He's kind of an eco-nut.

    There are has statistics about SETI@Home like "Since its launch on May 17, 1999, the project has logged over two million years of aggregate computing time..... With over 145,000 active computers in the system (1.4 million total) in 233 countries, as of 23 June 2013, SETI@home had the ability to compute over 668 teraFLOPS."

    Buuuut, how much power consumption is that? And I've really no idea about how much power consumption lies behind all the servers processing VISA transactions, or Amazon's servers.

  39. DaveV1.0 is a moron by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I do think that people who use illegal and/or non-prescribed drugs are personally and mentally weak. If you can't deal with your life without using drugs, there is something wrong with you and your life and you should change yourself and/or your life.

    Spoken with the compassion that the right wing became famous for. 'My life is good, and fuck anyone who wasn't lucky enough to be born with my genes/family/environment'.

    Look asshole, nobody is asking you to devote your life to the orphans of Calcutta, but why don't you try to show some decency to people who aren't as fortunate as you? Do you really think that people actively choose to be come habitual drug users? Really?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  40. Custom by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Why are GPUs even used? I thought custom ASIC boards outperformed GPUs so much they were relegated to the same garbage pile as CPUs.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  41. Got what they paid for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a beggar complaining about the $20 you gave them last week not being enough

  42. Nvidia aren't struggling to keep up with demand. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    They and the companies putting together the graphics cards are unwilling to bet on a future mining crazy and make enough graphics cards as is because if it ends then what are they going to do with all the excess cards? Plus all the used ones entering the market?

    Nvidia can keep up with demand but does it make economical sense to produce even more?

  43. As an alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I make lots of bitcoin transactions.

  44. "In a command economy" "in a market economy" by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    In a command economy, when more people want what you want, it makes it harder to get it.

    In a market economy, when more people want what you want, it makes it easier to get.

    Eventually. Waiting for the ramp-up can be a drag, sometimes.

    But it sure beats the hell out of fighting or pleading to get it. And is even better still than fighting or pleading, and not getting it.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.