Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Compatibility Issues Forcing US Air Force To Scrap a Significant Number of Computers (betanews.com)

The US Department of Defense has decreed that the Air Force must complete its migration to Windows 10 by March 31 2018. From a report: Failure to do so will result in any systems not running Microsoft's latest operating system being denied access to the Air Force Network. However, because Windows 10 is not compatible with many of the Air Force's existing systems, a significant number of computers will need to be replaced in order to hit the deadline.

151 comments

  1. Are they still using XP? by klingens · · Score: 0

    Cause that's about the only thing why it wouldn't be compatible with Windows 10. Hardware so old, only XP runs with it.
    At most, slap in a SSD and it will run fine usually.

    1. Re:Are they still using XP? by darkain · · Score: 1

      There are a number of things that Win10 has broken at this point from a hardware standpoint. One of which is imaging devices if they're using a now non-supported imaging codec. This broke a great deal of web cams, and I wouldn't be surprised if it broke other WIA devices too like normal cameras and scanners.

    2. Re:Are they still using XP? by ZeroPly · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Driver incompatibility is the big thing. And it's real - when someone's $2,000 microscope camera works with Win7, but not with Win10, upgrading is painful.

      "Slap in a SSD" is great when you have three computers at home. When you're dealing with thousands, the simplest steps become year long projects.

      --
      Support microSD: in a post 9/11 world, it is unwise to carry your data on media that you cannot comfortably swallow.
    3. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is actually happening in all of DoD. The big thing driving hardware refresh is the DISA mandate to use TPM 2.0 as part of their "Secure Hardware Baseline". There is a lot of hardware that is even just a couple of years old that is stuck at TPM 1.2 (vendors not offering updates) that is having to be replaced.

    4. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programs designed to use XP that don't play nice with compat mode exist and rewriting it to DOD specs is like... aircraft carrier money.

    5. Re:Are they still using XP? by freeze128 · · Score: 0

      Cameras and scanners can be replaced. They are usually just plugged into a USB port. There would be no reason to scrap the entire computer.

      Maybe they use some proprietary data interface card that is only available in an ISA or PCI format, and modern systems don't support those kinds of slots.

    6. Re:Are they still using XP? by DivineKnight · · Score: 2
    7. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      From a current end-user standpoint, i can see how you might think that.

      10 doesn't support many "older" fingerprint readers, many older sound cards, most older webcams or image capture devices. it doesn't support most of the pcmcia cards I have. it won't install or upgrade on entire series of processors, there's no real drivers for huge swathes of chipsets. plus there's no 10 driver for most of my crypto cards be they pci, pcmcia or expresscard.

      Seriously? in my experience Debian natively supports, Significantly more hardware than 10. Even most of my Weird stuff works fine in Debian..

      But I thought it was finally the Year of the Windows Desktop? You're saying I have to wait longer?!

      To be feature-complete Debian must implement phone-home spyware embedded deeply into the OS. Sure you have the source, but to do this correctly the spying must happen in a binary blob. That would achieve parity with Microsoft.

      Maybe they won't go for a binary blob? Then at minimum there must be NO configuration option to disable it, only a few options to decide how bad it gets. And the only way to disable it must be modification of the source plus recompilation. That isn't as "good" as the Windows 10 experience but it's close because most users cannot or will not bother. Just as most Windows 10 users can't or won't switch to Macs or Linux so they're stuck with being spied on.

      Then, and only then, can everyone enjoy the festival.

    8. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember early 90s when I would have been horrified to know that our military just uses Microsoft Windows and not some super secret flavor of a home grown operating system. What happened to security? Why Microsoft Windows? Can't we do better as a nation?

    9. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be feature-complete Debian must implement phone-home spyware embedded deeply into the OS.

      That's what Ubuntu is for.

    10. Re:Are they still using XP? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I would have been horrified to know that our military just uses Microsoft Windows and not some super secret flavor of a home grown operating system. What happened to security?

      Even Windows is more secure that some crap OS slapped together by a low-bid defense contractor. These are the people that designed the F-35. To get a feel for milspec software, go try to write a program in Ada.

      COTS > Milspec

    11. Re:Are they still using XP? by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 0

      You would think Linux would be perfect for old computers, that this would be a market niche they could capitalize on. You would be wrong. Unfortunately Linux breaks its driver compatability WITH EVERY RELEASE. They also on an irrational whim deleted XAA and dozens of drivers for older cards. The mentality of Linux devs seems to be that no one would ever want to use a computer that is older than three years and everyone should have the latest and greatest $1000 workstation.

    12. Re:Are they still using XP? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Also consider all the changes to the US mil. Say the CIA wants someone who can resupply the freedom fighters.
      Someone with navigation skills, can fly at night, has a lot of international flying experience, a top security clearance and the other people needed to load, unload.
      That search deep into plain text Air force files cannot be logged, seen, recovered, tracked in any way.
      Old version of mil computers stay secure from all congressional oversight.
      A new MS OS might go full Iran Contra and recall freedom fighter support missions years later.
      An old MS OS is a trusted OS.

      Also consider the medical records that have to be kept. Who has a poor diet, was not fit, could not pass a standard fitness tests, could not read a map, could not keep up.
      With an old OS everyone joining is set as ready for duty. A new OS might see the political changes to ensure everyone got a free pass on some too difficult fitness tests that are not politically correct.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm.. the OS doesn't store data, you use a fucking database for that. Typically on backend servers rather than on workstations.

    14. Re:Are they still using XP? by AaronW · · Score: 1

      It depends. For example, if it is specialized hardware it can't just be replaced.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    15. Re:Are they still using XP? by AaronW · · Score: 2

      That reminds me of some of the laptop computers I worked on back in the early 1990's. I worked for a well-known laptop manufacturer who made some laptops for the military. The military laptop I worked with was Tempest certified. It had a removable SCSI hard drive where all data on the drive was encrypted. It was a nightmare to take it apart. Once you took off the cover you had to remove all of the RF shielding (128 screws held the RF shielding on, I kid you not!). The screen was an electroluminescent VGA screen with a fine wire mesh in front of it. It was designed so there were no detectable RF emissions. The company's laptops were also quite rugged. One of the other commercial laptops they made was modified to run on the US space shuttle.

      The DOD can have a lot of weird hardware requirements and often the current hardware is what we would consider outdated due to the long development times and how long all the approvals and whatnot took.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    16. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of older video cards do not have drivers for windows 10.

    17. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit.

      I just installed debian in an old refurbished pc of 2006/7 (core duo 64bit) and everything works perfectly.

    18. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, thanks for the info! Do you have any advice where to find these strong black gay man? Where I live there are not many. :(

    19. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a issue of using old devices which are no longer supported by their manufacturer and have no driver support. That is not Microsoft's fault.

    20. Re:Are they still using XP? by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Funny

      pcmcia cards

      I thought these things were a myth.

    21. Re:Are they still using XP? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      You're close, I bet. Proprietary (old) imaging and scanning hardware will not have drivers. Old apps will require these devices.

      This isn't unusual for any large organization that standardized on apps. The planning and budgeting is a military problem only when there was a disconnect. Someone should have known this a year ago.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    22. Re:Are they still using XP? by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      OK, I was overexaggerating a bit. If you go further back like ones from 2002 or before I think you'll have more problems

    23. Re:Are they still using XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a current end-user standpoint, i can see how you might think that.

      10 doesn't support many "older" fingerprint readers, many older sound cards, most older webcams or image capture devices. it doesn't support most of the pcmcia cards I have. it won't install or upgrade on entire series of processors, there's no real drivers for huge swathes of chipsets. plus there's no 10 driver for most of my crypto cards be they pci, pcmcia or expresscard.

      Seriously? in my experience Debian natively supports, Significantly more hardware than 10. Even most of my Weird stuff works fine in Debian..

      Fuck Debian though. Use openSUSE Tumbleweed you will love it and never go back to Debian/Debian-based.

      If it compiles on Debian it'll compile on openSUSE.

      Remember Ian Murdoch? FBI murdered him because he wouldn't play ball and give backdoors. Dead now... how many backdoors? Infiltrate and subvert is obvious now. You can see wow latest Debian .iso's all over TOR networks. Same goes for Tails. Use nothing newer than Tails 1.4.1.

      EOS

  2. OpenWindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't that be nice? Windows 7 with bug fixes, driver updates, and security fixes. That's it!

    1. Re:OpenWindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would still have that farking stupid monolithic registry database, so no, that would NOT be nice.

  3. Really Sppoky to think by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    the DoD use Windows 10 Pro! Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:Really Sppoky to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Windows 10 Enterprise, but thanks for playing. "Secure Hardware Baseline" using TPM 2.0 is what is the big driver. Even systems only a couple of years old are having to be replaced because mfg's not offering updates from TPM 1.2

    2. Re:Really Sppoky to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should they use Macs or linux? Almost nobody uses them on the desktop. The training costs would be much higher.

      Windows sucks but at least most people are familiar with it.

    3. Re:Really Sppoky to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should they use Macs or linux? Almost nobody uses them on the desktop. The training costs would be much higher.

      Windows sucks but at least most people are familiar with it.

      You say that as though the military is REALLY WORRIED about costs.

      The way it works with any government agency? If they don't spend their entire budget, they get slapped with a smaller budget next year. So they will find ways to spend money. Switching to (say) Linux or OpenBSD would actually be a positive change. With all the training a military recruit must endure, learning how to use *nix would be a drop in the bucket.

      Funny how the government will do a great many maladaptive things in the Holy Name of Security, but not the ones that really make a lot of sense. Oddly, they only seem interested in the security measures that have the "side-effect" of increasing their power. Strange. Must be a coincidence. I'm sure their intentions are pure!

    4. Re: Really Sppoky to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you have any experience working for the DoD.

      I can assure you that the pressure to cut costs is real and has been true in DoD IT for many years.

    5. Re:Really Sppoky to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windows sucks but at least most people are familiar with it."

      There's a lot of new stuff in Win10 that breaks that paradigm.

    6. Re:Really Sppoky to think by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      I was really confused because how does a computer replacement fix compatibility "with many of the Air Forceâ(TM)s existing systems"? In context systems didn't seem to mean end user computers. Or servers.

    7. Re:Really Sppoky to think by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      You left out that Windows enterprise lacks the anal probe and does not claim ownership of your software claiming the right to install any software they want and any time they want and of course delete any software they want to for any reason they choose. Notice the latest scummy MS paid troll tactic claiming the professional version is not as corrupt as home user, mind you they demand the right to spy on you at your expense, you pay for the hardware, you pay for software and you pay for the internet connection and they demand control over you privacy. Talk about a truly scummy corporations.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Really Sppoky to think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these morons don't know anything about windows either. they use apps. windows users don't get a vote. they are not grown humans. they are ignorant slaves. when they grow up and take their freedom (or have it given to them for political expediency), they can have a vote.

  4. About time, overdue replacements by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

    Many of the systems I see around are identical to the models I was putting in place in 2009. They need to upgrade, and anything to pressure them to do so is a good idea IMO.

    1. Re:About time, overdue replacements by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Though typically deadline pressure only gets enough people added to the project when it's already too late.

      A better strategy would be to re-evaluate systems that are likely to miss the deadline, put exceptions in for those, and get the staffing needed to meet new deadlines that are realistic.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    2. Re:About time, overdue replacements by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      As an Air Force member this sounds absolutely preposterous.

    3. Re: About time, overdue replacements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, because it actually makes sense?

  5. Mass Chaos by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked for the USAF for 8 years as an Airman and 30 as a civilian. I went from an HP85 for line monitoring at a comm site in 1983 to workstations in an aircraft hangar in 2017. I remember going from win95 to win98 and it was good. We went to win2000 and it was good. XP Pro upgrade was good. Then Vista came.....over 50% of our workstations were down at any one time for over a year. After a few years we got Win7 and it was so wonderful. I use Linux at home but Win7 was as stable as I could wish and a million times better than Vista. They avoided 8 and when I retired last year the big dread was Win10. Nobody likes it at home, I know a bunch of people that bought Macs just because of Win10. I'm glad I'm going to miss that adventure.

    1. Re:Mass Chaos by bhcompy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Win10 is not much different than Win7 in most respects. You can completely ignore the Metro interface for the most part, unlike in Win8. Win10, at this point, is equal to or superior to Win7 in many respects.

    2. Re:Mass Chaos by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      You failed to explain the amiga3D.

    3. Re:Mass Chaos by Wootery · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Windows 10 also has spam in the start menu ('Suggested Apps'), mysterious phoning-home ('telemetry'), on-by-default web-search in the start-bar search, it deliberately makes it difficult to disable Cortana, and they're pushing UWP, the whole point of which appears to be lock people in to Microsoft's app-store that nobody asked for.

      But there's Direct3D 12, which seems neat... if you can't use Vulkan.

    4. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Win7 doesn't force Candy Crush, the Facebook app, or other ads in the start menu down my throat.

    5. Re: Mass Chaos by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Neither does Win10 Enterprise.

    6. Re:Mass Chaos by BBF_BBF · · Score: 3, Informative

      Windows 10 also has spam in the start menu ('Suggested Apps'), mysterious phoning-home ('telemetry'), on-by-default web-search in the start-bar search, it deliberately makes it difficult to disable Cortana, and they're pushing UWP, the whole point of which appears to be lock people in to Microsoft's app-store that nobody asked for.

      But there's Direct3D 12, which seems neat... if you can't use Vulkan.

      These "features" are irrelevant to an Enterprise installation of Windows 10 since they can and should be disabled for all Enterprise installations by competent system administrators.

    7. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're reading MS talking points that while valid do not address the concerns. There are show-stopping things going on in 10 that securing it is beyond crippling it, it's not possible anymore. It's NOT equal, you're an IDIOT for saying that.

      To say NOTHING of the forced rollout and telemetry deceptions!

      A FUCKING idiot, I can't emphasize that enough, and fuck being polite when BULLSHITTERS like you make obsequious bullshit and present it as fact. You either don't know what you're talking about AND SHOULD SHUSH, or you're a goon.
      Either way fuck off with your NONSENSE defense, go craft something in warcraft you fucking level 90 TROLL MORON before I auto-reboot your ass I just updated with a CLUE, wanker!

    8. Re: Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush. You're not going to trick the Linux guy into your nonsense. Once Linux, always Linux. There's nothing better.

    9. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you install Windows 10 in an enterprise, all of the setup adjustments necessary to limit applications, games, Cortana, telemetry, etc. are taken care of by your IT department at the server level unless they are completely clueless.

    10. Re:Mass Chaos by mikael · · Score: 2

      Suggested Apps can be deleted, Cortana can be disabled through the registry. Telemetry can be disabled/blocked. Some other web browsers are just as bad. I've seen telemetry streams go to Kaspersky Labs in Virginina. You can't blame Microsoft for wanting UWP. That was the pain with the old non-networked PDA's like the Palm Pilot in that you needed to keep them sync'ed manually between every machine you docked them with. Without anything like svn or git, a single text file could end up with three or more versions. I can see why they would want to do that. Their solution of course is a cloud password account rather than virtualizing one device into a private cloud server, the OS and other devices.

      The other pains are that it's hard to virtualize Windows 10 into a virtual machine because of all the hardware licensing/security checks.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it deliberately makes it difficult to disable Cortana

      This example is symptomatic of the whole win10 approach. The *majority* of people I've seen first exposed to Cortana do not like it. It's not much better than "Clippy reborn". In previous versions of win10, disabling it and going back to a regular search box was a simple switch in a sensible location. Then in their wisdom Microsoft decided to get rid of the switch in an update. To achieve the same outcome requires editing the registry and fiddling around with other low-level settings. That's fine for some people, but why would Microsoft make it so difficult for regular users when it previously was an option? Why?

      The whole system is riddled with that attitude. Worse, subsequent updates persistently ignore the changes and put everything back again. Thankfully there are people out there who have taken the time to bundle up the hard-to-tweak options into scripts that you can re-run after a new update screws it up. I use Win10-Initial-Setup-Script, which lets you tweak most things and put the settings into a profile once you've gotten them the way you like.

    12. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since we are talking about the Air Force, the rightly configured Enterprise version should be the only one allowed in the non-secret systems.

    13. Re:Mass Chaos by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 is wonderful. Macs are crashing left and right and Windows 10 just keeps chugging.

    14. Re:Mass Chaos by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      you turn those off dipshit.....and it isn't even on for enterprise.

      UWP is dead. Microsoft accepted that already. PWA is coming in the spring update and UWP will be tossed in the trash.

    15. Re:Mass Chaos by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 2

      Our VMWare farm does it just fine.

    16. Re:Mass Chaos by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is getting rid of Cortana as you know her and she is becoming a machine learning service. Your search will not need to involve her....and she is way better than clippy reborn...but you probably hate Google Assistant too.

    17. Re:Mass Chaos by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      Or use the "Long Term Service Branch" Enterprise edition, that doesn't get "feature updates" (AppX packages in layman's terms). However, it's not "so easy" to disable everything. You have to rip out all the AppX installs, then the AppXPackages, and then go into several "System folders", change permissions, and start deleting them. Be careful though, things like Calculator are now "Store apps" so just ripping out every Store app will remove half the normal features users are used to.

      If you don't do all the above, then the next new user that logs in will probably have a bunch of new apps show up. Another step is to clean up a profile, remove all the tiles, then export the startlayout into the Default user Shell profile directory.

    18. Re: Mass Chaos by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      It does push DuoLingo, Bing News, Pandora, Eclipse Manager, etc.

    19. Re:Mass Chaos by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't USAF use Linux or something else to save costs? They can even customize their own OS with it!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    20. Re:Mass Chaos by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      That "save costs" is profit and share holder value to the contractors.
      Nobody wants the US mil to have their own OS the US mil can create and upgrade using their own internal experts.
      The more Windows, the more work for contractors and consultants.
      Thats decades of wages, pay, shareholder value and over time.
      Entire parts of the US private sector are supported for years by helping the US mil understand and use M$ products.
      Should the US ever go back to an Ada or their own Linux with internal US mil workers?
      Think of the contractors and their spending in the local tows and all over a state near the US mil computer sites.
      Every day helping with the US mil with a MS product is a days local wage all over the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    21. Re:Mass Chaos by jezwel · · Score: 2
      I'm running Win10 enterprise at work and all of the things you mention are disabled.

      At home, sure it might be a problem for someone that needs to look at their start menu to figure out how to open an app.
      At work, all that crap is gone. Win10 not running on some hardware is a bigger problem for us - we needed to find devices running older chipsets that still have Win7 drivers as our Win10 migration is dragging out much longer than it should.

    22. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And forced reboots...

      Can anyone please tell me how to avoid forced reboots in Windows 10 with a non-Enterprise license?

      I need my PC to stay up for months at a time, with reboots only at a very definite time of my choosing.

      Can anyone help?

    23. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you're retired and have zero input into the machincations of our government-- especially the military. We need fewer republitards.

    24. Re: Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And for those who can't get Enterprise??

      This policy from Microsoft leaves a substantial gap in the market! There is a group of users who need control over their PC, so Home and "Pro" (it's not really since MS removed many options) are out, but they aren't large enough to justify the cost and infrastructure required for Enterprise. I'm guessing MS have decided that this market doesn't matter much to them as they are entirely neglected by the current licensing model.

      The problem is that most people currently working in this gap are the smart ones: engineers, small business owners, consultants, small manufacturers of hi-tech products. They know they've been neglected by MS, and the few of them that move on to positions of power and influence in larger companies will be looking to any alternative they can find.

    25. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enterprises use the enterprise version, your telemetry and cortana and the rest of your home version complaints aren't valid when it comes to enterprises.

    26. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because having 1000's of applications rewritten over more than a decade, spending hundreds of billions to do it ISN'T saving money.

    27. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasting admins' time by forcing them to disable these things with hidden options is user-hostile.

    28. Re:Mass Chaos by gtall · · Score: 2

      The short answer is they do not for the same reasons other organizations cannot be rid of MS...too much computing infrastructure and organizational processes rely upon MS software. Throwing Linux in there does not solve those problems. And no organization can halt operations while ripping out MS Malware and replacing it with software, especially not the U.S. Military.

    29. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with 2 clicks you can disable the Suggested Apps. And all Windows (and other OSes) have this phone-home telemetry.

    30. Re:Mass Chaos by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 also has spam in the start menu ('Suggested Apps')

      Only for stupid people who don't turn off the most obvious of settings "Occasionally show suggestions in start".

      Seriously anyone running windows 10 with this setting on should be given an etchasketch because they are too stupid to own a computer.

    31. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These "features" are irrelevant to an Enterprise installation of Windows 10 since they can and should be disabled for all Enterprise installations by competent system administrators.

      And by default, it should be off. Why do they push the responsibility on users/sys admins? Why do people need to search and look for all their features to figure out what they are doing behind the scene? Or you believe that they need to offer a (paid) class to train people just to configure WIndows 10? More money in the business?

    32. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about most users is they are not enthusiasts about computer computers, they just want something that works and that is the responsibility of the IT department. Where I work right now we deployed Windows 10 on every system, most are used by factory workers that wake up from their hangover, survive a day at work in a sweltering steel factory, then go home to spend an hour or two with their kids before hitting the bars to get drunk again. They don't know or care what operating system a computer is running, so long as they can send an email and login to the paycheck website is all that matters. From the IT perspective, that means we take the time to clear all the crap Microsoft pre-loads Windows 10 with, use group policy and registry edits to force IE configurations, and copy shortcuts to the desktop so they have everything available at first glance. The only thing difficult with Windows 10 for them is remembering to use their full email address as their username.

    33. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With 114,000 employees, Microsoft is one of the largest employers in the US which means that congress people kiss their booty and pass bills requiring the military to use products made by Americans that benefit the American people. Fat chance finding a Linux company that passes the muster, outside of RedHat which dropped development of their own desktop OS long ago.

    34. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not the same. As a person who has to be involved in the deployment of desktops, alot of the underlying systems to deploy computers have been changed or altered. Even in significant ways between the three major "versions" of windows 10, enough so that the same MS utilities that one used to deploy the 1507 don't work to deploy the 1607 and or the 1703. Reading the documentation on the site for the different methods of estting up and deploying Windows, it's aclusterfuck. It's like there's different teams developing parts of Windows that don't talk to each other. Some utilities overlap / duplicate funtionality, but work in a different, incompatible way.

      Windows 7 took a little bit of learning and research to use sysprep, dism (imagex), answer files and such, but once learned, it was reasonably consistent and understandable. I laughed at it at the time, but now that I've engaged windows 10, I miss that 'quality'.

    35. Re:Mass Chaos by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You've finally found a use for MCSE's!

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    36. Re:Mass Chaos by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Most business users are not using enterprise licensing. Bringing up enterprise, as if everyone (or everyone who matters) has that is invalid.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    37. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone running windows is too stupid to own a computer.

    38. Re:Mass Chaos by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Oh, but you can turn that off (if you're paying enough attention to realise they're doing it in the first place, and have the technical competence to disable it)

      Other companies are doing it too (and therefore it's ok?)

      It's understandable why they want to do that to their customers (and therefore it's ok?)

      Mixing weak sauces doesn't give you a stronger sauce.

      Your defence of UWP is particularly pitiful. Microsoft deliberately want to prevent distribution outside their app-store. They don't want you to be able to put the .exe on a Flash drive. They don't want Steam to be able to compete with them. They're walling off some of their technologies as UWP-only to try to force people's hands. And yet you're trying to spin it as benefiting the user.

    39. Re:Mass Chaos by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      The Air Force does have it's own Linux Distribution but it's not for standard installations. https://spi.dod.mil/LPS-Public...

    40. Re:Mass Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These "features" are irrelevant to an Enterprise installation of Windows 10 since they can and should be disabled for all Enterprise installations by competent system administrators.

      That's the kicker right there. You're talking about the same group of folks that has waited years to 'upgrade' to Windows 10 and has snubbed anything but Windows for at least a decade that I'm aware of. They don't trust Mac, Linux or Unix to be on the same network. Considering the vast majority of the computers in question do little more than Powerpoint, Word, Outlook and Internet Explorer, it's hard to call anyone involved "competent" when there are other enterprise-level solutions available - many don't even require re-training the populous to the same level as 7 to 10.

  6. govt joins the club by v1 · · Score: 1

    Consumers, and business owners in particular, love to drag their feet on upgrading their hardware. Kick the can down the street again and again, until finally they hit a wall and are forced to upgrade. It's interesting to see the government pulling the same derp maneuver.

    A better plan is to do gradual upgrades on a schedule. When you suddenly find you have to upgrade a bunch of computers, AND peripherals AND os AND proprietary software all at once, it's not only financially painful but causes major pains for the people that have to learn all this new stuff at once. But they're blind, they just can't see the train until it hits them.

    Can't say it surprises me to see the govt join the party.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:govt joins the club by Snotnose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A better plan is to do gradual upgrades on a schedule.

      Yep, cuz when you're managing 1,000+ systems it's much easier to deal with 5-10 different configurations than it is for just 1.

    2. Re:govt joins the club by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've seen it way too many times. The typical argument is "Why do I need to replace the controller, it works fine". The answer is, because it runs on a serial board interface on your old Win 95 machine that just died (22 years later) and the board doesn't fit in any new computer, and nobody makes the software for it or makes a replacement serial board to drive the machine.

      The sad thing is, that just might bust the company.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:govt joins the club by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's much easier to deal with 10-20% of your systems being down due to a vendor fuckup than 100%, so I's say yeah that's probably true in this case.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:govt joins the club by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      The sad thing is, that just might bust the company.

      Jeez, it's a real shame nobody ever thought of creating another operating system to save these people from Microsoft's reign of terror.

    5. Re:govt joins the club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is, because it runs on a serial board interface on your old Win 95 machine that just died (22 years later)

      The problem is windows, then. Don't go proprietary, and you'll be fine.

    6. Re:govt joins the club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not entirely certain how it's Microsoft's fault you can't find anything with an ISA slot for your PLC interface.

      The old one worked fine for two decades. Why would we have bought a spare?

    7. Re:govt joins the club by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If I had installed a 386-sx motherboard into some piece of hardware in 1996 that controlled a steel mill, or a lathe, and the software it ran on was embedded Linux, none of the current mainstream versions of Linux would now run on it.

    8. Re:govt joins the club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet wheels are still round. Go figure.

    9. Re:govt joins the club by Solandri · · Score: 2

      A couple of the small businesses I do computer support for have 1990s-era hardware for mission-critical operations. They're not as clueless as you've described. They knew what they were up against, and bought additional compatible computers, boards, and cables as spares while they were still available. These computers aren't networked so there's no security risk. And the old hardware does the job well enough that it'd be silly for them to spend a lot of money upgrading to a modern system.

      That's what a lot of people who think like you don't seem to get. A lot of business tasks don't need GHz computers with gigabytes of RAM. And if the computer you've got is handling that job just fine, it's a waste of money to upgrade it. Need I remind you we successfully landed people on the moon a half dozen times using a computer with as much processing power as a modern calculator. Bigger/faster is not always better.

    10. Re:govt joins the club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mainstream, yes, but you can always compile from source. Now ponder that and go compile Win10 for me, will you ;-)

    11. Re:govt joins the club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serial devices can work via a USB adapter.

      This thing may look terrible, but it Just Works on every Windows OS I've seen, even Windows 10.

    12. Re:govt joins the club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kernel version 3.8 is the one that dropped i386 support. Versions prior to that should still work. ELKS is supposed to run on an 8086 and is still being developed.

    13. Re:govt joins the club by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      Often industrial control from that era was actually RS485. Even those on RS232 often do funky things with the modem control signals that are either not replicated by USB devices or the timing is processor-speed dependant. RS232 was never a well-defined standard and was/is often abused, which compromises compatibility

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    14. Re:govt joins the club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you assume that another OS wouldn't have the same problem? Just because you can compile it yourself doesn't mean it'll keep running on your ancient hardware. When you have to upgrade and your old crap stops working, what's going to save you?

      dom

    15. Re:govt joins the club by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this up. Being homogenous really doesn't make sense at all if you ave availability requirements.

    16. Re:govt joins the club by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Riiight, because Linux has such great support for ancient proprietary devices like ISA CNC boards, Serial connections to laser cutters, when Linux can't even keep support for older webcams working.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:govt joins the club by toddestan · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you would have no problems using whatever version of Linux you were using back in 1996, and if you had to, you could even modify it.

      One of the problems I have seen with equipment running something like Windows XP is that Microsoft will not sell or license Windows XP anymore (outside of a MSDN subscription) which means that if you need to replace the computer, even if you can procure some new hardware that's compatible with Windows XP you can't actually buy a license from Microsoft to install Windows XP on it (legally). At least with Linux, licensing for old versions of Linux is not a concern.

    18. Re:govt joins the club by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Most of those devices like don't even handle the RS232 standard that well either. Granted, they can generally do fine with how almost all RS232 devices are actually implemented. However, for example RS232 standard allows for the voltage level to be up to +/- 15 V, and if you manage to find some weirdo device that actually uses something like a 12 V signalling level, good luck trying to find something that can talk to it that's not ancient.

  7. Other way around by bhcompy · · Score: 1

    However, because Windows 10 is not compatible with many of the Air Force's existing systems, a significant number of computers will need to be replaced in order to hit the deadline.

    Many of the systems are incompatible with Windows 10, not the other way around. One piece of govt software I work with uses a version of Crystal Reports that's about 15 years old, and hasn't been supported for ages. The reports do not function on newer drivers, and there's no compatible driver for W10, so users of that software have held off, but they're being forced off this year. And don't get me started on COM+

    1. Re:Other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One piece of govt software I work with uses a version of Crystal Reports...

      You say that as if it were a bad thing; I've seen the way Crystal Reports is abused, then there's that debacle Access.

    2. Re:Other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what virtual systems are for. I've run old versions of Windows on Virtualbox precisely to support Crystal Reports. Retaining junk hardware to run old applications is not a cost-effective solution.

    3. Re:Other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that Air Force's existing systems came earlier than birth of Windows 10, should say Windows 10 is incompatible with existing systems, since Windows 10 is the one that did not retain backward compatibility not the other way around.

    4. Re:Other way around by jezwel · · Score: 1
      Access????

      Luxury!!!

      We're still supporting Lotus Approach databases, which was deprecated in favor of MS Office back in 2003.
      Yep, 15 years later and these groups still haven't moved to a newer program...

  8. Yeah, I feel their pain... by ZeroPly · · Score: 1

    I'm small potatoes compared to the military - I manage about 800 desktops and laptops. But if the computer won't run Windows 10 (usually due to driver issues), there's not much choice. Even if the user loves their computer, doesn't want anything newer, and thinks Win10 sucks, I have to upgrade them. I'm a cheapskate by nature, and I hate recycling perfectly good equipment, but that's the cost of doing business.

    --
    Support microSD: in a post 9/11 world, it is unwise to carry your data on media that you cannot comfortably swallow.
  9. Must be old hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect its old hardware or software not compatible with Windows 10. Our most important systems should be upgraded much faster then this. Lot of this depends on contractors designing these computer systems and their inability to keep up with the times. But private business isn't much better at upgrading PC systems.

  10. The hardware apocolypse is getting worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phones getting replaced every two years or less due to planned obsolesce, high end GPUs and ASICs due to cryptocurrencies, and now Windows 10. Join the resistance. Stick with 7 for two more years until end of life, then switch to Linux, using that time to port your apps.

    captcha: reinvent

    1. Re: The hardware apocolypse is getting worse by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Yeah 2 years to rewrite all the drivers and 3rd party software

    2. Re:The hardware apocolypse is getting worse by mikael · · Score: 1

      I kept a coffin dodger laptop alive this way. There used to be companies who dealt with recycling spare parts for laptops plus the manuals in PDF form. The LCD screens were the most expensive part at half the price of the original laptop with a trade in of the old screen (they could replace the mini fluorescent tube). Everything else was fairly cheap - cooling assembly for the CPU/GPU, logic circuit for the screen lid closed latch. Even when the audio jack got mangled due to the cable being pulled, that could be replaced with a USB socket. Hard disk drives were upgraded as time went by: 40 GB/60 GB/80 GB/250 GB. But as the Linux and Windows OS's went to 64 bit, the minimum size OS partition went from 20GB to 60GB for a full development kit.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  11. So... does it uninstall things without asking too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know ... pesky things like custom military applications essential to security and operations?
    Because they can't be more important than the latest Windows update and that Facebook app that suddenly appeared to show notifications, can they?

    The US military is the biggest in the world, by a huge margin ... yet if they continue that way, something as silly as this will eventually be its downfall.

  12. Deadline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US Department of Defense has decreed that the Air Force must complete its migration to Windows 10 by March 31 2018.

    Boy won't the Air Force be embarrassed when the The US Department of Defense calls up to say

    APRIL FOOLS

    the next day?

    Hahaha!

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Deep State 9 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure that the government is forcing the Air Force to upgrade to Windows 10 so they can install spyware and find out what the Air Force is up to.

    Anyone who loves freedom will fight the government's efforts to control the military. Obama took away our guns and now he's trying to take away our F-22 Raptors, too.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Deep State 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fully legal AR-15 was just utilized to kill 17 in a Florida school. "Obama took away our guns"? And he's not trying anything now, especially to take away our F22 Raptors, as he is no longer President. Your situational awareness has a few holes - enough to make one wonder whether you need to find a detox facility because you've apparently been on a multi-year bender.

    2. Re:Deep State 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if your conspiracy theory was close to being true, why the hell would they have to upgrade to Windows 10 to have the spy ware? Why not the last Windows upgrade?

    3. Re:Deep State 9 by ddtmm · · Score: 1

      Obama took away our guns and now he's trying to take away our F-22 Raptors, too.

      You sir, are a moron

    4. Re:Deep State 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military *is* part of the government, and of course it should be under the government's control. If government leaders want to know what the Air Force is doing they just call a meeting and ask them what's up. Furthermore, Obama did not take away your guns.

      Stop worrying about your precious bodily fluids, General Ripper.

    5. Re:Deep State 9 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The military *is* part of the government, and of course it should be under the government's control. If government leaders want to know what the Air Force is doing they just call a meeting and ask them what's up. Furthermore, Obama did not take away your guns.

      No shit, Sherlock. It just shows that the most outrageous and uninformed statements can be easily mistaken for mainstream Republican views.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Deep State 9 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      You sir, are a moron

      I am a moron, but you still get a "woosh!" for not realizing I was joking.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Deep State 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The problem is there are about 50 million Americans who would say "right on!" to your "joke" and continually scream "fake news!" at the sane folks. Sarcasm / satire has become almost impossible to pull off.

    8. Re:Deep State 9 by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Most of us know you're just a joker.

    9. Re:Deep State 9 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Most of us know you're just a joker.

      One would hope.

      My jokes and witty repartee are the reasons I was elected President of Slashdot Comments three times. And I intend to represent all Slashdot commenters, even the haters and losers.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  15. Latin never goes out of style by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If they had used Mainframe "green screen" applications, they wouldn't have this problem.

    1. Re:Latin never goes out of style by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Certainly. The applications would still be running in terminal emulators on whatever hardware is current.

  16. Lightweight Portable Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.zdnet.com/article/the-air-forces-secure-linux-distribution/ The Air Force has their own secure Linux distro and Trump is treating his job like it's a business "getting a good deal" because he is ignorant of any other way and intelligence agencies know this, so they coerce him into putting everyone on W10. How do you beat free and open source? Is it possible that all of this just because of M$ Office? What other layman excuse could they give him? Better security? Ha! Definitely not. I doubt he's even heard of Linux and Microsoft is also taking complete advantage of his ignorance. An F-22 being powered by W10...NASA works with the Air Force on many aeronautics projects. Shuttles and ISS running on W10...https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06289_air_force.html. For the love of God, I can't be the only one that sees how fucking stupid and obvious this is -_-

    1. Re:Lightweight Portable Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.zdnet.com/article/the-air-forces-secure-linux-distribution/ The Air Force has their own secure Linux distro and Trump is treating his job like it's a business "getting a good deal" because he is ignorant of any other way and intelligence agencies know this, so they coerce him into putting everyone on W10. How do you beat free and open source? Is it possible that all of this just because of M$ Office? What other layman excuse could they give him? Better security? Ha! Definitely not. I doubt he's even heard of Linux and Microsoft is also taking complete advantage of his ignorance. An F-22 being powered by W10...NASA works with the Air Force on many aeronautics projects. Shuttles and ISS running on W10...https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06289_air_force.html. For the love of God, I can't be the only one that sees how fucking stupid and obvious this is -_-

      The really funny part?? If you actually read the EULA (yeah yeah, I know, but try it sometime!) you will find that Microsoft themselves warns you NOT TO USE Windows for anything "mission critical" or life threatening. Did the government suddenly have a shortage of lawyers??

      So they're using a product that up-front disclaims this exact kind of usage. Oh the irony!

  17. Wondering what happened to them all? by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

    Check out gsaauctions.gov. When government property isn't needed any more, it usually goes to some type of surplus room for a while. If no one claims the item from surplus then after a while it will be auctioned off to the public. Hence the site. They have all sorts of stuff on that auction site. From old FBI police cars to former DoD computers. Note that most of the computers have had their hard drives removed though.

  18. Missile Dudes Use 8-inch Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatdafuck to do? Kim Dot Un gonna get us while Missiliers sit waiting for never-to-come Windows update? This IS Trumpverse.

  19. Hum. MS has to love the profits by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, between Russia cracking it, and dod forcing USAF to run win 10, ms has to love it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  20. Changing OS is easy, unless.. by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    ..you have old computer controlled machines. The device drivers may not be available, either because the product is obsolete, the company is dead, or they decided to not update the drivers, or the updates are prohibitively expensive

    It's not just hardware. Some old (very expensive) software only runs on the old OS.. same problems as device drivers

    If all you use is common, recent software... no problem

    1. Re:Changing OS is easy, unless.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      At a previous job, we had two Unholtz-Dickie shaker tables. One was controlled by a PC running Windows XP, the other by a PC running Windows 2000. Nobody ever touched the machines except to run the U-D application to operate the shaker table.

      It's no more of an issue than the fact that some equipment might use Amphenol connectors that might have been out of production for a decade or more.

      At my present job they are scrambling to find ancient Cinch-Jones connectors.

  21. Why Not Virtual Machines atop Linux? by rea1l1 · · Score: 1

    Why not install some version of Linux and run whatever windows is necessary as a virtual machine? Sure would make windows upgrades easier to deploy, as one could merely distribute an updated image, and machines would be less likely to crash all the way down, and instead would only crash the emulator. For devices that depend on old versions of windows, the VM image might be read only in order to halt any malicious writes.

    1. Re:Why Not Virtual Machines atop Linux? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Because that adds a whole huge issue doing your 800-53 auditing.

    2. Re:Why Not Virtual Machines atop Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you honestly believe adding yet another layer of complexity and hardware extraction would simplify the process? are you fucking retarded? leaving aside all the drivers etc that require direct hardware access, the billions you would have to spend on hardware and software it would create a support nightmare.

    3. Re: Why Not Virtual Machines atop Linux? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has done it's marketing and schmear. Forget about what's best, consider what is politically best

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  22. 800-53 by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    Is what this is all about. If you've had to work with the various DISA stigs, then you know just how much software can't really easily be deployed. You can't just "run linux and a VM for Windows", because there are only SPECIFIC versions of Red Hat that have STIGs that allow it to be "properly audited". Getting a "Certificate to field" is a complicated, torturous route that must be re-done for each different enclave the CtF is for. Software like MySQL doesn't even have a STIG, so all of that is out the window.

    And it then there is Trusted Platform compatibility, Fedramp certified cloud, etc. My current job is working towards 800-171 certification, which is a watered-down version of 800-53. It's still a huge PITA, but these standards are needed because of APTs and stupid end-users. IMHO, your "electronic election system" should at least be at 800-171, but "STATES RIGHTS" means easily hackable machines.

  23. They should require a complete set of source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They should require a complete set of source code for every piece of technology utilized. There should never be a piece of third party technology that has a dependency like this that puts a third party in control of critical technology.

    It's utter bull shit that a government entity of any kind anywhere is putting themselves in such a situation where they do not have full control over the technology they're adopting. Talk about a security failure.

    I know there is at least one major government which is not Russia, China, or the United States that has recognized this issue and is taking steps to correct it. The country has figured out that having access to a complete set of source code for everything is critically important to there national security. It's not Iran or North Korea either. I'm not at liberty to state the country at this time although there is talk of funding a completely open SoC for national security reasons.

  24. Linux desktop 10 yrs of support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux desktop 10 yrs of support and the ability to take the source and compile it forward, unlike proprietary software with vendor lock-in.

    All US Govt SW and HW contracts should mandate support for Current and Current-1 OSes for 5 yrs. Mandate Windows and Debian Linux support to be safe. Even if your specific team doesn't use it, someone else will.

  25. Not too hard by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    For a fraction of the cost of the shitty F22 Program, the air force could...

    -Deploy brand new, state of the art computers across the entire Air Force.
    -Pay to have any legacy programs rewritten or migrated to their OS of choice.
    -Pay to have all of those certified.
    -Pay Microsoft to develop a DoD-grade OS compatible with those programs.
    -Give every Air Force employee a huge Christmas bonus.
    -Solve world hunger.
    -Fix the national debt.
    -Find extra-terrestrial life.

  26. They could use Linux..Wait, no by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    I was about to say that with Linux this wouldn't happen. But then I remebered that X.org had deleted dozens of video drivers when they decided on an irrational whim to delete all of the XAA code which turned a huge number of older computers into boat anchors. Linux systems developers seem to think you should need the latest Intel GPU made within the last 3 years. Whoops.

    1. Re:They could use Linux..Wait, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would think Linux would be perfect for old computers, that this would be a market niche they could capitalize on. You would be wrong. Unfortunately Linux breaks its driver compatability WITH EVERY RELEASE. They absolutely refuse backward comparability. They also on an irrational whim deleted XAA and dozens of drivers for older cards. The mentality of Linux devs seems to be that no one would ever want to use a computer that is older than three years and everyone should have the latest and greatest $1000 workstation. Not only does this make life hell for hardware manufacturers that would want to provide a driver but also means Linux shoots itself in the foot by neglecting a prime market segment due to the arrogant mentality of some developers.

  27. Anyone solved the multiple PIN prompts issue? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    Lots of people having multiple prompts for smart card PINs. Has anyone solved that one? And no, Google search doesn't return useful results.

    1. Re:Anyone solved the multiple PIN prompts issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that depends entirely on the card brand, reader brand, drivers, implementation model and any number of a 1000 other things. the way you phrase it, it sounds like a general problem which it certainly isn't. We certainly don't see it with our 1500 smart card based workstations.

  28. Linux by stooo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Use Linux

    --
    aaaaaaa
  29. Don't scrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than simply scrapping the "obsolete" computers, why not simply treat them as a peripheral and attach them to a new computer?

  30. How old are these machines? by btroy · · Score: 1

    My guess is a lot of them are quite old - 10+ years.

    Even in Linux, at some point the hardware is just too outdated.

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Pushing 32bit patches to 64bit os by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems theyve pushed us all to 64bit os, but still have older 32 microsoft office suite and other apps, plus pushing improperly matched 32 vs 64 bit updates. Outsour e the whole kit n kaboodle