Slashdot Mirror


How Does Chinese Tech Stack Up Against American Tech?

The Economist: China's tech leaders love visiting California, and invest there, but are no longer awed by it [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled]. By market value the Middle Kingdom's giants, Alibaba and Tencent, are in the same league as Alphabet and Facebook. New stars may float their shares in 2018-19, including Didi Chuxing (taxi rides), Ant Financial (payments) and Lufax (wealth management). China's e-commerce sales are double America's and the Chinese send 11 times more money by mobile phones than Americans, who still scribble cheques.

The venture-capital (VC) industry is booming. American visitors return from Beijing, Hangzhou and Shenzhen blown away by the entrepreneurial work ethic. Last year the government decreed that China would lead globally in artificial intelligence (AI) by 2030. The plan covers a startlingly vast range of activities, including developing smart cities and autonomous cars and setting global tech standards. Like Japanese industry in the 1960s, private Chinese firms take this "administrative guidance" seriously.

24 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Slow down that thought train by DaMattster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is only considering one singular comparison. This little story is trying to make China look more progressive and nothing could be further from the truth. If you speak out against the Chinese Communist Oligarchy, you and your entire family are subject to brutal imprisonment, labor, and re-education camps. Chinese economic reforms are only there to pacify and mollify the people and to distract them from getting together in large groups espousing any form of dissent. Dissent in China not only punishes the offender, but punishes his or her family. Once a family has a member that has been branded as a dissenter, that branding effects future generations of the family. Anyone whom thinks that China is more advanced than we are is severely ill-informed.

    1. Re:Slow down that thought train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      then you are a retard, by ignoring such advancements you allow the other kind of suppression to flourish, only by bringing them into the world so they can see and reap the benefits of being more open will the human rights problem ever be fixed. Not that most of the west has any right to speak on human rights as the US is still one of the worst offenders with that too.

    2. Re:Slow down that thought train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What really scares me is that as China gets wealthier and more powerful is that they'll begin to export their political model around the world. This could be in the form of selling/giving away surveillance tech or military hardware, undermining democracies with fake news and buying up their media or outright military invasion. Regardless of which way it happens i'm increasingly worried about our ability to stop it.

    3. Re: Slow down that thought train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      some Israeli tech companies are about as amoral as they come.

      Arent the cell phone stinger systems made in Israel? Isnt the company that says it can bust the encryption on Iphones from Israel? isnt one of the better dpi (deep packet inspection) and other internet inspection hardware providers from Israel?

    4. Re:Slow down that thought train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      as the US is still one of the worst offenders with that too.

      Maybe americans don't want to pay 50% income and 25% vat in order to pay for your ever expanding list of government 'human rights.'

      not torturing prisoners, holding them without trial or bombing civilians is hardly a huge added expense. regardless it is the hypocrisy that is the issue. don't whine about rights violations when you have your foot on the necks of others.

    5. Re:Slow down that thought train by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people believe in the China Model. There will never be a Trump in China, and that alone has a lot of endorsement. The Chinese government need not waste its time in friction when it can be turned into momentum. No endless chatter on news shows or fake news memos issued by political partisans in Congress. Instead, China makes a decision, and then *does* it. That has a lot of attraction as a way forward to the future. Heck, the New York Times itself publicly admired the China Model and did not retract or apologize for the story.

      America never really was a "Global Force for Good" in my lifetime (born after 1945). I've experienced the US as being one of the most expansionist powers in modern history that refused to sign most human rights treaties, isn't a party to the International Criminal Court, all too willing to cozy up to dictators and in a state of perpetual war.

      The faux "Pax Americana" brought us unprovoked wars, illegal coups, regime changes, shock and awe, ultra-right wing or jihadi proxy armies, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, agent orange, CIA backed mujahideen, death squads, torture, assassinations, extraordinary renditions, black sites, Guantanamo, drone wars, big brother and the surveillance state, etc.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Slow down that thought train by larryjoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A lot of people believe in the China Model. There will never be a Trump in China, and that alone has a lot of endorsement

      I strongly believe that the most effective and efficient form of government is a benevolent dictatorship. China has effectively the latter and as long as it can grasp onto the former, it can do tremendous things. However, past history in China and indeed in all countries over all time has shown that the grasp on benevolence in leadership is fleeting. The emergence of a Trump and worse in China, the US, and elsewhere is a near certainty. In the US, we can get rid or at least wait out our Trumps in just a few years and with nonviolent elections. That's not the case in China, Russia, North Korea, etc. There, we have seen in our own lifetimes that the passage of non-benevolent leadership in these totalitarian regimes requires the passage of decades and millions of lives.

      For all its many faults, I vastly prefer the US system of systematic inefficiency over the benevolently unstable Chinese system.

    7. Re:Slow down that thought train by larryjoe · · Score: 3

      For all its many faults, I vastly prefer the US system of systematic inefficiency over the benevolently unstable Chinese system.

      murder rate per 100,000:
      USA=4.88
      China 0.74

      Over "decades", say 50 years, Americans would murder about one million more of its own people than China (if China were the same population as the US). You're partly correct about the "millions of lives" part.

      This just in, thriving democracy India murder rate=3.21

      murder rate

      Yes, the US and the US system have many faults, many more than just the murder rate. However, looking at just the per capita murder rate is just one way to look at the issue. While the Chinese system may have a lower per capita murder rate, it has a higher capital punishment rate and higher hard labor punishment rate. More significantly, many of those Chinese prison sentences and deaths are based on defying the government. Over the last half century, it also has a much, much higher genocide rate that swamps any murder numbers of any kind. As an America who values freedom of speech and conscience and the right to directly criticize the government, I would probably be killed in China. So, yes, I vastly prefer the US system.

    8. Re:Slow down that thought train by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      The US government is a serial warmonger. China hasn't started even a single war in decades. You think people haven't noticed that? You think Libya or Syria enjoys being how it is? Or Iraq?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  2. No thanks to Chinese tech by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ta hell with the idea of social-credit systems.
    Ta hell with mass surveillance of the kind that even the NSA can't dream of in Urumqi.
    Ta hell with body scanners and mass privacy invasion on public transport.

    Thank G-d the West isn't China. We have some pretty scummy governments, but nothing as evil and intrusive as China yet.

  3. How does stolen US tech compare to US tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's the same shit.

    1. Re:How does stolen US tech compare to US tech? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you've ever worked in technology and actually thought about what you were doing, you'd realize that you're building on the ideas of others.

      If the only thing China were capable of doing is copying US tech, then US tech companies and the US military would have no real worries from Chinese tech espionage. By the time they got the tech working, we'd be onto the next big thing.

      But China is a lot more capable than that. They're a huge country sitting on a huge talent pool with a regime that understands the value of technological research. When they steal US tech secrets they aren't just stealing grist for their mill; they're stealing seed corn.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. Great. They're not there yet but they're learning. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

    And fast.

    • Young Doc: No wonder this circuit failed. It says "Made in Japan".
    • Marty McFly: What do you mean, Doc? All the best stuff is made in Japan.
    • Young Doc: Unbelievable.

    I've been ordering from Aliexpress and Chinavasion for a long time. A lot was just knockoffs. Then there was some innovation now they're actually incrementally improving on their designs.

    My current mobile computing device (without cell access) is a Vernee Active. IP68, USBC, 8-cores, dual sim, world (minus the US) capable. For cheap. It's a great phone. It looks like Vernee actually put time and effort into designing their website.

    Chinese "brands" are popping up and they're doing pretty good. And their current customer service is better than Walmart. I've gotten a few bad boards, some with a design flaws, some stuff that broke and I've never had a problem getting a refund or a replacement. They're fighting each other for 5-star reviews and they'll do anything to get you to leave a 5 star review.

    A good industry to have been watching is 3D printers. The product life cycle follows a fairly predictable design cycle.

    1. Someone comes up with a design.
    2. People rush to the design.
    3. Other companies knock off the design.
    4. Someone comes up with a new design.
    5. GOTO 1

    Most of the early growing pains with FOSS were because the chinese simply didn't understand how it worked. I have some soft bricked devices because of bad uBoot with no source. However that's been turning around. Allwinner/sunix has come a long way in the last decade. It's probably as good as Broadcom at this point but not quite Marvell.

    Walmart and Amazon should be afraid because the Chinese have learned how to cut them out.

  5. Re:there weak IP laws let them copy all of our goo by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's what they said about Japan: they make shitty copies, no, they make good copies, wait, Japanese products are putting ours to shame.

    In actual tech (not these web and app based services TFA calls "tech"), innovation, industrial design and quality control, the Chinese are getting there. I've worked with some first rate original Chinese software, and just this weekend got my hand on an upcoming product designed in China (not a knockoff of a Western device). First class stuff that competes with the top brands here and is actually better in some ways. Their English language manuals are actually useful now, and they are finally waking up to the fact that Times New Roman is a poor choice of font to use on buttons and equipment, and looks especially shitty when printed in gold. The coming years will will continue to see a flood of cheap rubbish coming from China... but the amount of quality Chinese original goods is set to increase. Western designers take note. And you can be sure that China will pay more attention to IP laws when that trend continues.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  6. Shopping online & paying on your phone isn't t by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    it's an application of tech. VC firms don't do a whole hell of a lot of actual tech. Return on investment is too slow. A few megacorps still spend a bit on R&D, mostly for the tax write offs. The majority of actual new tech comes out of the University system.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  7. Re:Who cares? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    Hu cares.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  8. A look from the trenches by spiritplumber · · Score: 2

    I am the only US manufacturer of solid state laser cutters, and have to deal with Chinese competition daily. AMA.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    1. Re:A look from the trenches by spiritplumber · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My experience is that it's tough to compete. Not so much because of costs, but because for example my stuff has to be FDA compliant, and theirs doesn't, and they get away with advertising peak power as constant power (or just "forgetting" an extra zero in the product description) and I don't. I'm against tariffs, per se, but it would be great to see more false advertising enforcement.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  9. Re:What's in California? by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

    Google is making self-driving cars... which is hot right now.

    And Facebook was at the heart of social media... which was hot back in.... 2006?

    Yahoo was hot back when searching the Internet was a big deal. Back in the 90's.

    Cloud computing peaked around 2011. But, YES, if you set up a company revolving around self-driving cars, cloud computing, social media, or even search, you are a tech company. The field itself isn't new. But unless you bring something new to the table, you're not going to do very well. This might shock you, but people are still research and advancing the technology of internal combustion engines and making them more efficient, despite being around for... what? A century? That's still tech. And if you made a company dedicated to improving the technology of that old-ass invention, you'd have yourself a tech company.

    I think you might be expecting a revolutionary game changer with every new business. We're living in the middle of a technological singularity. Just like the industrial revolution, it's coming in waves. We've got computers, personal computers, the Internet, hand-held computers, and I think artificial intelligence will be another one, if it's not already. But there are still people working on building better computers. It's still a pretty new field, all things considered in the broader scheme of "the economy".

  10. Re:Patents by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    If Chinese "tech" is so good, then where are the patents?

    If American "patents" are so good, then where is the tech?

    A lot of patents are granted for stuff that never has been or never will be built.

    An idea doesn't necessarily have to be useful for it to receive a patent. Go ahead and patent a laser head mount for sharks. We'll talk about it here on Slashdot a lot, but you'll never see a real shark wearing one.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  11. Re:Who cares? by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

    None of that crap is "tech". e-commerce? Taxi rides? That isn't tech. And AI isn't real, so just stop.

    Yea no shit. It's like saying you publish literature when you print vacuum cleaner advertisements. Then having an industry award ceremony about all the great copy your business has printed for other businesses.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  12. Re:there weak IP laws let them copy all of our goo by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's what they said about Japan: they make shitty copies, no, they make good copies, wait, Japanese products are putting ours to shame. In actual tech (not these web and app based services TFA calls "tech"), innovation, industrial design and quality control, the Chinese are getting there. I've worked with some first rate original Chinese software, and just this weekend got my hand on an upcoming product designed in China (not a knockoff of a Western device). First class stuff that competes with the top brands here and is actually better in some ways. Their English language manuals are actually useful now, and they are finally waking up to the fact that Times New Roman is a poor choice of font to use on buttons and equipment, and looks especially shitty when printed in gold. The coming years will will continue to see a flood of cheap rubbish coming from China... but the amount of quality Chinese original goods is set to increase. Western designers take note. And you can be sure that China will pay more attention to IP laws when that trend continues.

    Hysterical doomsayers also predicted during the 1980s that Japan threatened the very foundations of Judeo-Christian, Capitalist American civilisation, that Japan was outcompeting the US on every level and that the US was essentially doomed. None of that hysteria panned out. China will grow as an economic, political, military and technological powerhouse and with that growth will come all the same problems Europe and the US currently have. What China will not do is become the end of Judeo-Christian, Capitalist American civilisation as we know it so everybody should just calm down and untwist their panties. The only threat to Judeo-Christian, Capitalist American civilisation stems from Americans themselves and the greed, stupidity, shortsightedness and corruption of the people they elect into office.

  13. Great Leap Starvation by aberglas · · Score: 2

    And indeed, that is the point.

    Xi Jinping has been concentrating power, and doing everything he can to squash even the mildest forms of dissent. As he gets holder, he will likely get more conservative.

    The Confucian ethic obeys authority. But then we have this strong contradictory force of entrepreneurial energy. And a large and growing body of middle class Chinese that have spent time in the west, outside the great firewall.

    It is unstable and frightening. Hopefully it will resolve peacefully, but if Xi (or his heirs) digs in then it could get very ugly.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion