Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Develop Online Game That Teaches Players How To Spread Misinformation

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Cambridge researchers have built an online game, simply titled Bad News, in which players compete to become "a disinformation and fake news tycoon." By shedding light on the shady practices, they hope the game will "vaccinate" the public, and make people immune to the spread of untruths. Players of the fake news game must amass virtual Twitter followers by distorting the truth, planting falsehoods, dividing the united, and deflecting attention when rumbled. All the while, they must maintain credibility in the eyes of their audience. The game distills the art of undermining the truth into six key strategies. Once a player has demonstrated a knack for each, they are rewarded with a badge. In one round, players can opt to impersonate the president of the United States and fire off a tweet from a fake account. It declares war on North Korea complete with a #KimJongDone hashtag. At every step, players are asked if they are happy with their actions or feel, perhaps, the twinge of shame, an emotion that leads to the swift reminder that "if you want to become a master of disinformation, you've got to lose the goody two-shoes attitude." The work is due to be published in the Journal of Risk Research.

148 comments

  1. People are too stupid by DogDude · · Score: 0

    People are simply too stupid. The human species developed technology without wisdom, and killed itself. It's all over.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a reason for that saying ...
      "don't believe everything you hear"

    2. Re:People are too stupid by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      People are simply too stupid. The human species developed technology without wisdom, and killed itself. It's all over.

      It's not over yet. Those who manage to survive will learn from our mistakes. Humanity is the ultimate weed: killing all of us is quite a task. Just to hedge our bets, hopefully, Mars colonization and terraforming will take off in this century.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who manage to survive will learn from our mistakes

      The haven't before. The Greeks wrote a bunch of plays that fully enveloped the human condition. Few know them any more

    4. Re:People are too stupid by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      People are simply too stupid. The human species developed technology without wisdom, and killed itself. It's all over.

      Are you always this optimistic? You must have girls lining up at the door to be this positive about life.

    5. Re: People are too stupid by Falos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If you're not reading news, you're uninformed.
      If you're reading news, you're misinformed."

      I assume the message is to make your own determinations from aggregate data, to not simply parrot like a mental human centipede.

      Ironically, a Retweet does exactly that.

    6. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your horse has been dead for months, msmash. Please just stop.

    7. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It used to be that Slashdot's value was the comments. People were always shitty to each other, but you'd get a nice mix of assholes who knew something. Now we get this shit.

    8. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are simply too stupid. The human species developed technology without wisdom, and killed itself. It's all over.

      Oh fuck, does that mean I'm a ghost?!? Oh, wait, nope. Still got a pulse. Guess you were wrong.

    9. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is exactly the attitude the assholes are looking to create. No, you don't have to discount everything you haven't seen with your own eyes.

      Actual fake news, the bad shit, was the "Obama is a secret Muslim", "Clinton pedophile ring," horse shit that got spread around by conspiracy nuts.

      Trump took the description and made it his catchphrase to discredit stories he doesn't like.

      Just don't share conspiracy theories, for God's sake never watch Fox News, understand that MSNBC and the Daily Show will show you the perspective that fits their story, and otherwise just watch with a critical eye. It's not hard. It's not any different than what you've always had to do.

    10. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely hope that this is satire, but given the number of mentally unstable people that insist, despite all evidence to the contrary (including proven collusion on the part of the Clinton campaign and DNC with foreign intelligence assets) that Trump was in fact somehow knowingly aided and abetted by Russians to 'hack' the election that Obama and Clinton insisted couldn't BE hacked...

      Well it's impossible to tell the difference any more between the brainwashed that actually think this way and any satire of them.

    11. Re: People are too stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0

      Russia used misinformation to install Trump and look what we have: mass shooting after mass shooting. At this rate all humanity will be gone in years. It is too bad Hillary has not yet gotten into power, she would be our savior from this kind of misinformation Russian tyranny.

      Ironically what you said is the definition of fake news.

      "Russia used misinformation to install Trump"

      There's no evidence this is true

      In fact Rosenstein said it wasn't true

      https://www.realclearpolitics....

      Now, there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.

      "and look what we have: mass shooting after mass shooting. "

      Mass shootings account for less than 1% of homicides in the US. They are a bad way to understand gun violence.

      A more typical example of gun violence is deaths from gun violence. And most of those happen in places that already have gun control.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Gun violence is most common in poor urban areas and frequently associated with gang violence, often involving male juveniles or young adult males. Although mass shootings have been covered extensively in the media, mass shootings in the US account for a small fraction of gun-related deaths and the frequency of these events steadily declined between 1994 and 2007, rising between 2007 and 2013.

      "At this rate all humanity will be gone in years"

      There'll still be loads of humans left at the end of Trump's second term.

      "It is too bad Hillary has not yet gotten into power, she would be our savior from this kind of misinformation Russian tyranny."

      You know she's conceded the election, right? The idea that if people keep whinging online enough the election result will somehow change and she'll replace Trump in the White House is delusional.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you got it wrong.

      It's "Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see."

    13. Re:People are too stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      We're much more advanced than those silly Greeks. Everyone knows that men and women are absolutely indistinguishable, there's no point getting married or having kids and telling everyone that sleeping around won't cause any problems at all. What's that you say? The rate of sexual assault is going up and the birth rate is going down because telling everyone to stay single means they spend their adult lives having drunken one night stands instead of having a family? Slut shaming! Sexist nonsense! We just need to import third worlders to get the birth rate up! Oh you object to that? You must be a racist! Remember all humans are completely interchangeable and anyone who says there are any differences between groups is a deplorable! Also we need to import people who'll pay taxes so we can afford to pay the natives to do nothing! How DARE you point out the people we're importing are actually more likely to be doing claiming welfare than paying taxes than the natives their replacing! Fascist!

      Gender is a social construct and that's why some men need us to pay for someone to cut their genitals up so they can become women. If we don't, they might kill themselves!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re:People are too stupid by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      You're simply too stupid. Things have never, ever been so good for the human race, in all of history going back to the Dawn of Man. It's not just great, but it's getting better every day. "It's all over" LOL. You're not just stupid, you're a drama queen too.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't possibly be retarded enough to believe that ignorant shit you wrote.

    16. Re: People are too stupid by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

      Exactly, I tend to agreed with answer, and it really is all over for humankind. Russia used misinformation to install Trump and look what we have: mass shooting after mass shooting. At this rate all humanity will be gone in years. It is too bad Hillary has not yet gotten into power, she would be our savior from this kind of misinformation Russian tyranny.

      That's how you level up in the game, folks!

    17. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you just got trolled right?

    18. Re: People are too stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    19. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the RESPONSIBILITY AND DUTY of a voter to inform themselves, and to factcheck everything and treat every single piece of information as having an agenda that opposes yours.

    20. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fear that the next mod point may well undo your carefully orchestrated, yet delightfully on topic troll. Until then, bravo!

    21. Re: People are too stupid by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      No it hasn't, at least not on actual tech stories.

    22. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspiracy theories were/are an important part of human evolution. "It's better to thing every bush is a bear, than think every bear is a bush."

    23. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Showing your bias, msmash?

      You get to pick the stories, maybe you should at least pretend impartiality.

      Oh, and lol @ your 7 digit uuid. given the demographics of this crowd, there is some near perfect irony in having a pup try to teach the older, wiser dogs some really bad tricks.

    24. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it is not better to think every person is a conspirator.

      There was a study that showed that Americans trust each other a lot more than Russians trust each other and that impedes Russian growth.

      The study is the basis for the Russian strategy now -- cripple the US by making them distrust each other as much as Russians do.

      It's a really good strategy. It'll work, and there's nothing we can do about it.

    25. Re:People are too stupid by gnick · · Score: 1

      The rate of sexual assault is going up and the birth rate is going down because telling everyone to stay single means they spend their adult lives having drunken one night stands instead of having a family? ... We just need to import third worlders to get the birth rate up!

      You're worried about the birth rate? We're just a little under 2 children per mother, which seems just fine to me. Also, what do drunken one-night-stands have to do with sexual assault?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    26. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent comment had nothing to do with anything you said, Hal. So we can assume that no matter what anyone said, you were going to say something like that. And you do this a lot.

      It's fairly clear gender roles are basically always on the forefront of your mind. Why is that? They don't impact you at all. You've likely met (or known that you met) maybe 5 transgender people in your life. So why the intense, constant focus on it?

    27. Re:People are too stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      We're just a little under 2 children per mother, which seems just fine to me.

      In Europe you'll find it depends a lot on ethnic groups. The white people have a low birth rate and the immigrants have a high one.

      In the US from what I can tell the religious conservatives have a higher birth rate than secular liberals.

      E.g.

      http://anepigone.blogspot.com/...

      The immigrants have larger families and may vote for the left but they despise its social agenda as much as I do. Probably more so.

      All this tells me the left's social deconstructivism is not going to be an issue long term. In the US that doesn't matter because you've got fast breeding conservative Christians to take over. In Europe the fast breeding religious conservatives are Muslim, and that is an issue.

      Also, what do drunken one-night-stands have to do with sexual assault?

      A lot. If both parties are wasted it's much harder to negotiate consent. Also some percentage of men don't care about consent when they're drunk. And drunken women are going to have a harder job fighting them off.

      Compare and contrast to the traditional US ideal where you're not expected to have sex until you're married. I'm not sure everyone did that, but they didn't expect to have drunken one night stands.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    28. Re:People are too stupid by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...The white people have a low birth rate and the immigrants have a high one...the religious conservatives have a higher birth rate than secular liberals...The immigrants have larger families and may vote for the left...you've got fast breeding conservative Christians...In Europe the fast breeding religious conservatives are Muslim, and that is an issue.

      You seem to be saying that the problem isn't that there aren't enough children, just not the right type of children. I asked why you thought the rate needed to be higher and you responded by describing the breeders.

      If both parties are wasted it's much harder to negotiate consent.

      Maybe, but I've had drunken sex that I wouldn't trade for the world.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    29. Re:People are too stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1, Troll

      You seem to be saying that the problem isn't that there aren't enough children, just not the right type of children. I asked why you thought the rate needed to be higher and you responded by describing the breeders.

      If the end result of SJW culture is that the SJWs don't have enough kids to be survive that's not a problem with me. Well it's not in the US at least because US Christian religious conservatives will replace them. If they get replaced with Muslim religious conservatives - and that's the most likely outcome in Europe - that's a huge problem.

      Not least for the SJWs because Muslims are a lot less tolerant of their social agenda than I am. All those LGBT types are going to end up getting the ISIS Free Water slides For Homosexuals treatment (Water slide and pool under construction )

      The US outcome is more benign - a world where Ben Shapiro types are the majority is not going to being throwing people off building for being gay.

      I.e. just saying 'the birth rate is fine' is missing the point. If some groups are breeding above the replacement rate and others are breeding way below it, that will affect the makeup of the society in the long run.

      Amusingly the only people who deny this are the secular liberal types. Who are not the ones breeding above replacement rate. Of course they're also keen on bringing in third worlders who tend to breed above the replacement rate.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    30. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have a problem with Muslims and "third worlders" reproducing faster than you'd like. You don't have to be a SJW to just stop being a bigot.

    31. Re:People are too stupid by gnick · · Score: 1

      So your solution to the rise of segments of the population that you find undesirable is to have a breeding race? To quote some words of wisdom that may help your strategy, "Where all the white women at?"

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    32. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The white people have a low birth rate and the immigrants have a high one.

      You seem to see this as a problem. Are you openly white supremacist or still in the closet?

    33. Re:People are too stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Natural selection is inherently 'a breeding race'. It doesn't matter whether you think you're in one or not - groups that breed above the replacement rate will end up outnumbering ones who don't.

      Or, as someone put it 'demographics is destiny'. At current trends Germany in 50-100 years time will look at lot different from Germany now. Of course if you don't have kids, that doesn't affect you. But if you do have kids it will affect them, or their kids.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    34. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! maybe we can fight arson, by teaching people how to start fires.

    35. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you would be so kind as to set the ball rolling, sir!

    36. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Other people won't do what I want them to do, so I'm throwing my toys out of my pram. Waaaah!!

    37. Re:People are too stupid by gnick · · Score: 1

      Yesterday, a friend of mine posted a meme on FB accusing one of the Parkland survivors of being a “crisis actor”. I talked reason to him and he took it down. An alternate strategy would have been to ignore it, but have an extra child that I raise not to do things like that. I like my strategy better.

      You’re probably not going to talk a Muslim out of being a Muslim, but I’m not sure why you would. Most American Muslims are not trying to implement Sharia law. You’re definitely not going to talk an immigrant out of being an immigrant, but I don’t see why that’s a problem either. You might not like their general political slant, but trying to further your political beliefs by out-breeding your opponents instead of reasoning with them is stupid. Some “third worlders” are reproducing at rates that we’d be foolish to try to match. So what? Different people have different opinions based on different circumstances. Some of those opinions may be influenced by religious beliefs that you don’t agree with (Catholics & abortion come to mind.) If there are enough people whose opinion differs from yours, you might not get your way. Your country may differ from your imagined ideal. It happens all the time. Deal with it.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    38. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drawing erroneous conclusions using flawed logic, then pointing you finger and saying "das waycist" doesn't work anymore.

    39. Re: People are too stupid by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But it is not better to think every person is a conspirator.

      There was a study that showed that Americans trust each other a lot more than Russians trust each other and that impedes Russian growth.

      The study is the basis for the Russian strategy now -- cripple the US by making them distrust each other as much as Russians do.

      It's a really good strategy. It'll work, and there's nothing we can do about it.

      The Russians have the help of the 1%, and the left, which are both always pushing for diversity and mass immigration. Both lower social cohesion as shown even by left leaning sociologists. Want to fragment America, just let enough Spanish speakers who won't assimilate and you'll get your wish.

      Citation

      http://archive.boston.com/news...

    40. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing, but watch out for Hal_Porter to regurgitate some information straight from the mouth of Alex Jones. Probably something about how "the brown people are outbreeding the whites and it's cultural marxism caused by the left!".

      I love reading his posts, it's evidence that some people truly are irredeemably stupid. No amount of reality can fracture his cognitive dissonance.

    41. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh, don't tell Hal_Porter that 99% of the "secular liberals" he despises so much are directly created from the conservative Christians he's championing for breeding. It's well known that large conservative families end up with more liberal children directly proportional to how conservative the family itself is.

      So go ahead and get all Deus Vult, and literally create the socialists of the future. Brilliant strategy!

    42. Re: People are too stupid by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had points to upvote you, you're right - slashdot comments have always been like this. Maybe it's the Russians downvoting you. :-)

    43. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup. Thanks for demonstrating that it definitely works and you're already seeing your countrymen as enemies.

    44. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the kid with the seven digit slashdot ID.

    45. Re: People are too stupid by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 1

      You guys have fake strawman arguments down to a science that's for sure.

    46. Re: People are too stupid by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 0

      ^ That line of thinking certainly falls in line with your "white people are all evil and should be put in camps and killed" philosophy

    47. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for proving my point effortlessly :) I distinctly love it when he links to extremely well known fake news to prove his points. I'm just waiting for the infowars.com links to start popping off as his grip on his own sanity slips further and further into tinfoil hat territory.

    48. Re:People are too stupid by Alsee · · Score: 0

      Vote Conservative Christian! We don't murder as many gays as Conservative Muslims do!

      --

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    49. Re:People are too stupid by scatbomb · · Score: 1

      "That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history." -A. Huxley

    50. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? Aren't you the guy that just bitched about strawmen?

    51. Re:People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You’re probably not going to talk a Muslim out of being a Muslim

      Your risk here is that the Muslim will talk you INTO being a Muslim, or paying their special tax that non-Muslims have to pay to support Muslims (jizya or somesuch).

      The reason isn't the power of his words, it is that out of any set of Muslims, a statistically significant set will just go ahead and use force to make this happen, often with tacit support from another statistically significant set of the overall pool of Muslims (after all, the plan is in both their first-order financial interests).

      This isn't a big deal as long as your nation isn't flooded with this sort of folk, but that's the topic of discussion, right?

      > Your country may differ from your imagined ideal. It happens all the time. Deal with it.

      Or better yet act.

    52. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you practicing spreading misinformation?

    53. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't mean to post that anonymously. I meant to post that with my incredibly witty, irreverant and original username.

    54. Re: People are too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the vantage point of someone that never leaves his suburban house and spends all day with a screen strapped to his face, Life has never been better, and you would have every reason to think it would keep being that way. But you never know, the storm might come to you next.

  2. Research paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC? by nonBORG · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Seems like what is happening for real on all the mainstream media channels.

    --
    You can't handle the truth! - Because I don't post left all my comments get modded down, bye bye Karma.
  3. opposite effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By shedding light on the shady practices, they hope the game will "vaccinate" the public, and make people immune to the spread of untruths.

    Did they learn nothing from the Monopoly game?

    Fast forward to 2040-- "New! Cheaters edition of Bad News!"

    *facepalm*

    1. Re:opposite effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pay 2 win?

      will there be loot boxes too?

  4. Soooo ... by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

    They reinvented twitter?

    1. Re:Soooo ... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      With learning feedback, improving your disinformation skills. What could possibly go wrong?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Soooo ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what trolling and astroturfing has been all about up to now. Just now got attention from research and more general public.
      Nothing new to most /.ers.

  5. Something something ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... fake news. Something something complete.

  6. The people playing this game... by StevenMaurer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...aren't the ones who need "vaccination".

    1. Re:The people playing this game... by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      ...aren't the ones who need "vaccination".

      I have vaccine for chemtrails if you'll pay for my Arduino and stepper motors... seems like a fair trade.

    2. Re:The people playing this game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like this years flu vaccinations, I'm sure it will be well worth the time and effort.

    3. Re:The people playing this game... by asylumx · · Score: 1

      What time & effort? For me, at least, it was just a little prick in the arm. I deal with little pricks all the time so it was just a normal day.

    4. Re:The people playing this game... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0

      Maybe it could appeal to those types with some sort of re-skinning? Make it a game where you're a dastardly lib'rul media organization trying to trick people into voting for Hillary with misinformation? The hard part would be slyly working a concept of objective reality into the game without turning them off.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  7. DEEP STATE EXPOSES DEEP CROOKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And them crooks ... ARE ... GOING ... DOWWWWWWWN!!

      This is just getting started! Roll OVER Baytoevun!!

    1. Re:DEEP STATE EXPOSES DEEP CROOKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eet mee blak asss whiit booy.

  8. Politics simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, it's a politics simulator then?

    1. Re:Politics simulator by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "So, it's a politics simulator then?"

      It's called FoxSim.

    2. Re: Politics simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God dammit it's COON SIM! COON SIM!

      Captcha: Lame filters hate TV quotes

  9. They have had this since 2003 by mdhoover · · Score: 1

    The game is called EvE Online

    If it is good enough for economic modelling, it sure is good enough for modelling "Fake News"

  10. Facebook will sue them by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    for infringing on their business model and trade secrets.

  11. Donald Trump's review by Kjella · · Score: 0

    Players of the fake news game must amass virtual Twitter followers by distorting the truth, planting falsehoods, dividing the united, and deflecting attention when rumbled. All the while, they must maintain credibility in the eyes of their audience. The game distills the art of undermining the truth into six key strategies. Once a player has demonstrated a knack for each, they are rewarded with a badge.

    This game is a shameless ripoff, I already got my badge a year ago.

    In one round, players can opt to impersonate the president of the United States and fire off a tweet from a fake account. It declares war on North Korea complete with a #KimJongDone hashtag.

    I just one-upped your game by hacking the real account and sending it from there, oddly enough the combination is the same as on my luggage.

    At every step, players are asked if they are happy with their actions or feel, perhaps, the twinge of shame

    That's strange, my game kept insisting that "the only way to win is not to play", that's a silly game. Game on!

    By shedding light on the shady practices, they hope the game will "vaccinate" the public, and make people immune to the spread of untruths.

    Mission accomplished, I see so many untruths written about my presidency and I don't believe any of it, it's all fake news.

    (this review may not actually be written by Donald Trump... or is it? #fakenews #realnews #whocantellthesedays)

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Donald Trump's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, there's still never been any confirmation he ever said "shithole countries". That's some glorious fake news.

    2. Re:Donald Trump's review by belthize · · Score: 1

      When multiple sitting senators don't count as confirmation there is no longer any such thing as confirmation. Any and everything can be discounted as 'they're lying'.

  12. Re: Research paid for by Hillary Clinton and the D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God, you're so boring.

  13. Flawed Premise by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Gamers already know how to manipulate people, that's what multiplayer gaming is all about.

  14. Like "Need for Speed" teaches safe driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The premise here is that by doing something in a video game you'll be vaccinated against doing it. OMG. So all we need to do is have our children playing video games with as much raping, murdering, terrorism, bullying, and every other bad thing you can think of as possible and they'll all be vaccinated and the world will be as one. Why didn't we think of this sooner? It's so perfect!!! And I guess the more realistic we make it the better, right?

    1. Re: Like "Need for Speed" teaches safe driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... vaccinate ...

      Yes, or at least make them realize that they're not precious snowflakes and no-one has to save them from all the bad things in the world.

    2. Re:Like "Need for Speed" teaches safe driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOLY SHIT! That strawman went over the goddamn horizon! It was like out of an anime!

  15. Monopoly was created like this, and failed by aberglas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The original game was created by anti-monopolist Elizabeth Magie to awaken people to the danger of uncontrolled capitalism -- in the game money always goes to money. But the effect was exactly the opposite, it encouraged capitalistic thinking.

    This game should be called "the Joy of Fake News".

    Incidentally, I wish the SJWs would never have coined the term, and would stop using it. Trump et. al. has done an excellent job of turning it around to mean anything they disagree with.

    1. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, I wish the SJWs would never have coined the term, and would stop using it. Trump et. al. has done an excellent job of turning it around to mean anything they disagree with.

      It was a hamfisted, blatant, hypocritical operation for the mainstream media/elites/whatever to try to reassert control of the information flow in the internet age. They raised the spectre of Onion-style, literally-made-up stories fooling millions of rubes - something that has never been a significant issue in the 30+ years of widespread internet use until Hillary woke up November 9th in sudden need of a scapegoat - then almost immediately bait-and-switched it up and started lumping popular conservative sites like Breitbart and Drudge in with the literally-fake stuff that almost no one was reading in the first place. As poorly as this effort has gone, that hasn't stopped them from continuing to try even to this day.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/russian-propaganda-effort-helped-spread-fake-news-during-election-experts-say/2016/11/24/793903b6-8a40-4ca9-b712-716af66098fe_story.html
      https://politics.slashdot.org/story/18/02/06/2224253/fake-news-sharing-in-us-is-a-rightwing-thing-says-oxford-study

      Trump so successfully co-opting the tactic only speaks to its inherent foolishness. It's accomplished absolutely nothing in the direction of making conservatives and independents pay attention to mainstream media sources again - which they almost unanimously haven't been since the media collectively lost their damn minds over Trump in early/mid 2016 - but it seems to have succeeded in further isolating liberals from conservative points of view, increasing lefty extremism and partisan hostility and whatnot.

    2. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That poll has 14% of Republicans trusting the media

      That's a higher percentage of journalists that were Republicans in 2014

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      What's happened is that the media have essentially given up on the pretense that they're objectively report on the news and instead decide to report on stories that fit their narrative as emotionally as possible and ignore ones that don't.

      So after a mass shooting CNN will get a bunch of kids on to demand gun control. They don't do the analogous think when an illegal immigrant killed Kathryn Steinle. Or when a Omar Mateen shoot up a gay bar. It's not like they get crying, photogenic kiddies on to demand a travel ban, border wall or an end to sanctuary cities.

      And the thing is once you know the double standard it's impossible to take CNN seriously as a news source anymore. That's not to say everything they say is fake, rather there are a lot of true things they will never say. And a lot of the things they do say are are too heavy on emotion and too light on facts.

      For example the left wing Washington Post fact checked Marco Rubio's claim that gun control would not have stopped mass shootings and found it was true

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      Will CNN present that as a counter point to the kids yelling "Hey, hey NRA! How many kids have you killed today?" ( The answer obviously being "Zero", unlike Planned Parenthood). Yeah, don't hold your breath. The Democrats know this of course which is why they didn't even try to implement gun control when they last had control of all three branches of government.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it is a reaction to the mainstream media outright lying. They've been caught so many times it's ridiculous, and here you are parroting the line that it doesn't exist. Glenn Thrush, the former senior staff writer at Politico was exposed by WikiLeaks as he ran an article by Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta prior to publishing. What was his punishment? He was hired by The New York Times as a political correspondent.

      Calling fake news fake news is fake news, according to the fake news. Journalists spread fake news all the time, whenever it satisfies their emotional needs and validates their pre-existing political biases. It's very menacing if journalists with the loudest claim to authoritative credibility are abusing their positions constantly to entrench falsehoods in the public's mind. Four Viral Claims Spread by Journalists on Twitter in the Last Week Alone That Are False.

      Recently, four big scoops were run by major news organizations â" written by top reporters and presumably churned through layers of scrupulous editing â" that turned out to be completely wrong: Reuters, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, and others reported that the special counsel's office had subpoenaed Donald Trump's records from Deutsche Bank. They weren't. ABC reported that Trump had directed Michael Flynn to make contact with Russian officials before the election. He didn't. The New York Times ran a story that showed K.T. McFarland had acknowledged collusion. She didn't. Then CNN topped off the week by falsely reporting that the Trump campaign had been offered access to hacked Democratic National Committee emails before they were published.

      Forget your routine bias, these were four bombshells disseminated to millions of Americans by breathless anchors, pundits, and analysts, all of them feeding frenzied expectations about collusion that have now been internalized as indisputable truths by many. All four pieces, incidentally, are useless without their central faulty claims. Yet there they sit. And these are only four of dozens of other stories that have fizzled over the year.

      If we are to accept the special pleadings of journalists we have to believe these were all honest mistakes. They may be. But a person might then ask, why is it that every one of the dozens of honest mistakes are prejudiced in the very same way? Why hasn't there been a single major honest mistake that diminishes the Trump-Russia collusion story? Why is there never an honest mistake that indicts Democrats?

      When all the errors are in the bank's favor, you can be forgiven for thinking there's more at work than sloppy arithmetic.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mainstream media coined the term fake news, because they were getting BTFO left and right every time they said there is no way Trump can win, and all kinds of crazy shit they kept making up.
      Then the right rightly turned it on them.

    5. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, I wish the SJWs would never have coined the term, and would stop using it. Trump et. al. has done an excellent job of turning it around to mean anything they disagree with.

      Keep saying SJW over and over and get the same result because nobody outside the cliquey Internet bubble that made it up it reads it as derogatory.

      Fighting against social injustices, like racism? Gee, which side is public opinion going to be on....

    6. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well spoken tovaritsj

    7. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Wow, SJWs coined the term fake news? Is there anything you can't blame them for?

      Of course there isn't, because the definition of SJW is "someone I disagree with", i.e. it's a tool for allocating blame to whoever the reader despises. It's brilliant because it doesn't matter who the reader is, you don't have to guess what their political leanings are.

      They just assume the SJWs you were speaking of are whoever they blame for everything, and you get a knowing nod from all sides.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you paid attention you'd know full well that there are hundreds of stories that attempt to diminish the Trump-Russia collusion. They all fall apart because the evidence available to the public outweighs their blithe editorial whining. This is the problem with conservative news sources, they exist only in a reactionary shell, and no amount of hard evidence available to the public will ever convince them to not stop trying to change the narrative.

    9. Re:Monopoly was created like this, and failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - it should be named "Fake News Tycoon". Much catchier.

  16. It was bound to happen by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

    Someone went and actually built a better idiot.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:It was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the politically correct term for them is "leftists".

  17. Practice Makes Perfect by freudigst · · Score: 1

    Wow, if the kids could only practice long enough, they might become half as good at it as the mass media and U.S. government itself!

    I mean, how else are you going to cover up the pedophilia of your leading ranks and convince the public to risk vaccinating their own children, for nothing?

    Indoctrinate yourselves while you still can!

  18. up your anus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you poof

  19. Liberals fact check, Conservatives don't. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/p...

    Horner was known for writing false stories and disseminating internet hoaxes that often went viral on Facebook and hoodwinked thousands of people.

    They included a story falsely claiming former President Obama was gay and a radical Muslim, and another saying protesters were being paid thousands of dollars to demonstrate at Donald Trump's campaign rallies.

    Horner took on greater prominence during the presidential election when false stories were widely shared on social media during the race between Trump and Hillary Clinton.

    In an interview with The Washington Post in 2016, Horner said he thought Trump won the White House because of him. Horner said Trump's supporters didn't fact-check his stories before posting them. ...

    The fake news mill over seas said the same thing. Liberals fact checked stories so the stories couldn't get traction. So after a short time, all their stories were targeted at convervatives.

    Like Mulder, conservatives wanted to believe.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Liberals fact check, Conservatives don't. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Liberals fact checked stories so the stories couldn't get traction.

      Quick, how many school shootings have there been this year so far? What would you believe if you just looked at Facebook and Twitter postings int he last few days?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:Liberals fact check, Conservatives don't. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Interesting you brought that up. The graphic showing an incredible number of school shootings came thru our political discussion site and was *immediately* fact checked.

      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DW...

      The data behind that graphic was posted within minutes...

      https://www.snopes.com/2018/02...

      [q]Firearm attacks during school hours: 7 (incidents resulting in injuries or deaths: 5)

      22 January: Italy High School, Italy, Texas â" A 16-year-old student opened fire with a semi-automatic handgun in the school cafeteria, wounding another student.

      22 January: NET Charter High School, Gentilly, Louisiana â" An unknown person fired shots at students from a vehicle in the school parking lot. One person was injured (though not by gunfire).

      23 January: Marshall County High School, Benton, Kentucky â" A 15-year-old student opened fire with a handgun on school grounds, killing two and injuring 17.

      25 January: Murphy High School, Mobile, Alabama â" A student fired a handgun into the air during a fight with another student. No injuries were reported.

      26 January: Dearborn High School, Dearborn, Michigan â" Shots were fired during a fight in the school parking lot. No injuries were reported.

      31 January: Lincoln High School, Philadelphia â" A fight during a basketball game resulted in the shooting death of a 32-year-old man outside the school.

      14 February: Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Parkland, Florida â" A 19-year-old former student opened fire with a semi-automatic rifle, killing 17 and injuring 14.

      Firearm attacks NOT occurring during school hours: 2 (incidents resulting in injuries or deaths: 2)

      20 January: Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina â" A 21-year-old was shot and killed during a fight at a party on school grounds.

      5 February: â" Oxon Hill High School, Oxon Hill, Maryland â" A student was shot and injured in the school parking lot during an attempted robbery.

      Shots fired during school hours, unknown reason: 2 (no injuries)

      10 January: California State University, San Bernardino, California â" Bullets were fired through a window, with no suspects or motive identified.

      8 February: Metropolitan High School, New York, NY â" A student fired a gun into the floor of a classroom.

      Unintentional gunfire during school hours: 3 (incidents resulting in injuries or deaths: 1)

      10 January: Greyson College, Denison, Texas â" A student fired a weapon belonging to an adviser, believing it wasnâ(TM)t loaded. No injuries were reported.

      1 February: Salvador B. Castro Middle School, Los Angeles â" A semi-automatic rifle brought to school by a 12-year-old student accidentally went off. Four students were injured.

      5 February: Harmony Learning Center, Maplewood, Minnesota â" A third-grader pressed the trigger of a law enforcement officerâ(TM)s handgun. The weapon went off but no one was injured.

      Suicide attempts during school hours: 1 (resulting in death)

      10 January: Coronado Elementary School, Sierra Vista, Arizona â" A middle school student shot himself in the bathroom of the school and was pronounced dead at the scene.

      Stray bullets hitting school buildings during school hours: 1 (no injuries)

      4 January: New Start High School, near Seattle â" Bullets fired by an unidentified shooter entered an administrative office. No injuries were reported.

      Stray bullets hitting school buildings NOT occurring during school hours: 1 (no injuries)

      15 January: Wiley College, Marshall, Texas â" Gunshots fired from a vehicle in the parking lot of a college dorm entered through a window, but did not injure residents.

      Even tho liberals are against guns, more are for factual data.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:Liberals fact check, Conservatives don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re "more are for factual data", and yet, factual data is rarely presented in the media.

      I hope the fake news game includes the two favorite methods of the major media. One is to deliberately leave out facts which don't support their agenda such as those you have kindly presented here. The second is to "interpret" the news and repeat the interpretation loudly and often with a sense of moral outrage. The interpretation is not the fact but screaming racist gets the audience on board.

      Sorry but conservatives do fact check. Liberals only present the facts they like. As the major media do.

      It's tough being older and remembering how we have been manipulated by the media.

      I recommend getting your news from several sources. I frequently get outraged when I hear the news on CNN and then get in the car to go to work and hear the other side of the story from the radio. Between the two, I get different sets of facts on the same story.

    4. Re:Liberals fact check, Conservatives don't. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Your statement is in direct contradiction to what I just did above which was to post the misleading news and then post the actual data.

      I also recommend watching and listening to a wide range of media. However, Fox has basically descended to a propaganda arm.. Frequently, when the entire world is presenting a news story, they completely ignore it (suppress it really) so people who rely on Fox only are not even aware the event occured.

      Wapo, The Economist, and the NY times are better sources than CNN and MSNBC. MSNBC actually has a fairly pro-wealthy bias. They'll talk about how you can't raise taxes on the "job creators" (in the face of evidence that the "job creators" mostly invest in China- and any investment in the west is mostly in government bonds).

      Two of the major creators of fake news said liberals don't bite and conservative/mr. trump fans do. One made thousands of dollars a month based on that observation. You can't ignore that fact.

      I used to be a conservative. Their hypocrisy and lying drove me from the republican party halfway thru my voting life.

      The so-called "fiscal conservatives" are already on target to add 7.8 trillion dollars to the debt. If this goes on, we are on track for them to add 32 trillion dollars to the debt.

      (and fact checking that- it looks like it's exploded since I read the prior article. Now it's 8.7 to 10 trillion dollars in new debt (just over 1 year into the Trump presidency).

      https://www.cnsnews.com/news/a...

      https://www.brookings.edu/opin...

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Liberals fact check, Conservatives don't. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      A more nuanced position would be...

      Enough conservatives pass on stories without fact checking them that demonstrably false stories proliferate.
      Enough liberals fact check stories demonstrably false stories die out.

      Some conservatives do fact check. But not enough (please fact check more if you are conservative).
      Some liberals do not fact check. (please fact check more if you are liberal).

      Snopes and Politifact are good starting locations.

      Stay clear of Nunez new fake site.

      Here's a list of fact checking sites.

      http://guides.lib.berkeley.edu...

      Here's another list
      https://www.dailydot.com/layer...

      âoeBe skeptical. Check the author. Check the publisher. Check the sources,â noted Eugene Kiely of FactCheck.org. âoeYou have no idea how many people forward us emails that are anonymously written that made unsubstantiated claims with no sources. Same thing with some âstoriesâ(TM) and âreportsâ(TM) written and posted on partisan and advocacy websites. Who is behind the website? Whatâ(TM)s their agenda? How is it funded? How transparent is it? Does its articles and reports provide named sources of information with links to source material so readers can check the facts themselves? Reagan used to say, âTrust, but verify.â(TM) Iâ(TM)d say verify first, and then determine if the source is worthy of your trust.â

      The best partisan fact-checking sites
      Note: Partisan fact-checkers are those with a purported liberal or conservative bent.
      For conservatives who want to start slow before using non-partisan sites:

      NewsBusters

      NewsBusters is a website that devotes itself to âoecombating liberal media bias.â NewsBusters was launched by the Media Research Center in 2005, the same group behind CNSNews.com. It has been criticized by Media Matters and others for its questionable fact-checking techniques.

      For liberals who want to start slow before using non-partisan sites:

      Media Matters

      Media Matters is a media watchdog group that focuses on conservative news. Since its launch in 2004 in the height of the Bush administration, Media Matters has analyzed conservative media, including broadcast, radio, and print media for factual errors. Media Matters narrowed its focus on Fox News and a handful of other conservative news sites in 2011, in what Media Matters founder David Brock deemed as âoea war on Fox.â

      Editorâ(TM)s note: This article has been updated for relevance.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Liberals fact check, Conservatives don't. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      I prefer your more nuanced position, but still don't believe "Enough liberals fact check stories demonstrably false stories die out." What I find instead (and according to a Chrome plugin, my Facebook feed from about 1K people is pretty balanced along the political spectrum, so I see examples of 'em all) is that all sides post stupid stories, most of the misleading stories have some kernel of truth to them which allows an extreme partisan to argue it's accurate, but most of the lies are a matter of slanting or twisting in favor of an opinion, leaving out relevant information which would give a more accurate perspective.

      I don't see a retraction from politicians and celebrities like Bernie Sanders about their posting the 18 in 2018 propaganda. I do see a simple site: search for it on Google claims about 283,000 tweets with it and 686,000 Facebook posts, including 5 TV station and 3 "news" site posts in the top 10 (when I ran the search, YMMV). That doesn't indicate "died out" to me (but there is a scattering of debunkings caught in the first few pages of the results). I posted on Facebook a Washington Post debunking in response to a couple of people I know who posted variations on the meme (There is another "300 since 2013" version one had posted) and the response I got from the original posters was along the lines of copy/paste from the biased site explaining how they were a non-profit.

      Yet, it's an obvious attempt to deceive people who see "school shooting" and think "someone got shot and maybe even killed", not "some cop accidentally shot a wall from a holstered gun" and it's easily debunked. That's why I picked it, because despite how easy it is to debunk, people are still posting and re-sharing it by the thousands.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  20. ... says guy with no evidence who writes fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amazing you draw the conclusion you want from the statements of a guy who admits to having made fake news without bothering to get any sort of corroboration at all and cite that as proof. Shouldn't you, I dunno, fact check that by seeking actual data, rather than things someone said on the internet?

    Or was this post a test to see if we're actually paying attention? If so, you're a genius for putting it in such an ironic format.

  21. Job Training by Brett+Buck · · Score: 0

    OK, I see right through this, CNN and MSNBC are teaming up to get a little free training for their next generation of muckrakers, race-baiters, and conspiracy theorist they call "anchors"

  22. Re:... says guy with no evidence who writes fake n by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Informative

    The story I was mentioning above.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/1...

    TBILISI, Georgia â" Jobless and with graduation looming, a computer science student at the premier university in the nation of Georgia decided early this year that money could be made from Americaâ(TM)s voracious appetite for passionately partisan political news. He set up a website, posted gushing stories about Hillary Clinton and waited for ad sales to soar.

    âoeI donâ(TM)t know why, but it did not work,â said the student, Beqa Latsabidze, 22, who was savvy enough to change course when he realized what did drive traffic: laudatory stories about Donald J. Trump that mixed real â" and completely fake â" news in a stew of anti-Clinton fervor.

    More than 6,000 miles away in Vancouver, a Canadian who runs a satirical website, John Egan, had made a similar observation. Mr. Eganâ(TM)s site, The Burrard Street Journal, offers sendups of the news, not fake news, and he is not trying to fool anyone. But he, too, discovered that writing about Mr. Trump was a âoegold mine.â His traffic soared and his work, notably a story that President Obama would move to Canada if Mr. Trump won, was plundered by Mr. Latsabidze and other internet entrepreneurs for their own websites.

    âoeItâ(TM)s all Trump,â Mr. Egan said by telephone. âoePeople go nuts for it.â

    If his pro-Clinton site had taken off, he said, he would have pressed on with that, but âoepeople did not engage,â so he focused on serving pro-Trump supporters instead. They, he quickly realized, were a far more receptive audience âoebecause they are angryâ and eager to read outrageous tales.

    âoeFor me, this is all about income, nothing more,â he added.

    ---

    So yup, conservatives and republicans went crazy reading fake pro-trump, anti clinton stories written by this guy's staff of writers. Unlike the 13 Russians just indicted, Beqa didn't even care politically. He was just trying to drive ad hits.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  23. So they're competing with CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noone does misinformation and fake News like CNN.

  24. Liberals fudge statistics, Conservatives don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See how that works. Take your ideological trolling elsewhere. Enjoy your Washington post polling data - Hillary had a "98% chance of winning".
    Forgive me if I conclude that your dubious liberal media studies are disinformation. because well they are.

  25. Actually they cloned CNN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ultimate in fake news, fear uncertainty and doubt.

  26. We REWARD Bullshit Click-Bait Artists. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Until you get capitalism to stop recognizing Bullshit Click-Bait Artist as a valid job skill for any "news" agency, this little game of yours is nothing more than job training for a lucrative future career. Teaching kids to maintain credibility by lying, with a POTUS bonus round to try and incite a war against another country? What's next, Pipe Bombs in the Kitchen with Barney the Dinosaur? The sick irony of teaching violence as we have a nation marching against it right now.

    And no, you aren't going to "teach" the masses with this crap. They are blissfully ignorant, and rather enjoy it. You are going to create a new generation of con artists though. Congratulations. I'm sure that'll end well.

  27. BeauHD has top score... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    probably cheated tho.

  28. Re:Research paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Research paid for by Hillary...

    How the heck does crap like this get modded "Insightful"?

  29. I assume players with the highest scores will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume players with the highest scores will be offered jobs at CNN, MSNBC, and the like.

    1. Re:I assume players with the highest scores will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's anonymous, so, no.

      I scored 9978 BTW

  30. Research to perfect trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Profit model will just end up being:
    "Create app about trolling,
    have millions use app,
    use data from app to sell to troll farms/governments,
    becomes research as to perfecting trolling"

    This is some real Bernays / 1984 crap going on.

  31. How to use Rules for Radicals effectively. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to use Rules for Radicals effectively.

  32. Good gravy by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1, Interesting

    At least in 1984 it's only the Two Minutes Hate. Don't you people ever get tired of this stuff?

    I've seen some sore losers in my life, but you are the sorest. Give ... it ... a ... rest.

    You lost because you sucked. Nobody cared about this "fake news", because there was more than enough real news that was highly unfavorable to you, despite the fervent loyalty (to you) of the news readers.

    BTW, if you really think these 8o Russians and their tiny Facebook ad buy decided the election, then I highly recommend that you hire them. They are the most amazing marketers ever.

    1. Re:Good gravy by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      BTW, if you really think these 8o Russians and their tiny Facebook ad buy decided the election, then I highly recommend that you hire them. They are the most amazing marketers ever.

      You really think these 80 russians were posting propaganda to Facebook in the same manner that Indians run scam call centers? Nay. They wrote software to spread the propaganda for them in a very highly efficient manner... botnet style...

      --
      We'll make great pets
    2. Re:Good gravy by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      BTW, if you really think these 8o Russians and their tiny Facebook ad buy decided the election, then I highly recommend that you hire them. They are the most amazing marketers ever.

      You really think these 80 russians were posting propaganda to Facebook in the same manner that Indians run scam call centers? Nay. They wrote software to spread the propaganda for them in a very highly efficient manner... botnet style...

      Then the Dems should hire them to do botnets. However they did it, it's the most amazing and cost effective campaign the world has ever seen, apparently.

    3. Re:Good gravy by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Their techniques are amazingly powerful and they are the world's best persuaders. We need to give them jobs, they are head and shoulders better at their jobs than anyone in our society. Right?

      When even the New Yorker is ridiculing the idea that there is some great Russia conspiracy, you know it's all over but the crying: https://www.newyorker.com/news...

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Good gravy by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Then the Dems should hire them to do botnets. However they did it, it's the most amazing and cost effective campaign the world has ever seen, apparently.

      I'm not saying the Russians actually did that. I think that claim is probably is absurd. But IF they did do it, they certainly wouldn't do it in the manner you described. That would be stupid. The Russians aren't stupid. Their educational system in terms of STEM fields is much better than ours.

      --
      We'll make great pets
  33. A game? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    So it's a game about a fictitious social media site full of memes... you don't need a game for that...

    --
    We'll make great pets
  34. Spread Misinformation? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    A game about spreading miss information? Where do I sign up?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Spread Misinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you already have a Slashdot account. (ducks)

  35. Re:... says guy with no evidence who writes fake n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, so you cited a news story that says that some people who admit to writing fake news claim--without providing evidence--that conservatives don't fact check. You do realize that "evidence" means more than "I found a 'news' article that agrees with me!" right? The information provided in the article is literally only the say-so of some people who claim to write fake news.

    I couldn't find a more ironic way to lampshade that if I tried.

    But no, everyone is vulnerable to fake news. People don't bother considering the sources of information and whether we can believe a "sources say" rumor with no corroborating facts. People don't bother separating the opinions from the facts or figuring out how well the facts support that opinion. They don't bother to notice that some "journalists" are partisan hacks with an axe to grind--except when they disagree with them. In that case, we instead get lazy and stop reading instead of seeing if they have a point this time.

    The ironic thing is that the people who believe they are invulnerable are the most vulnerable. I know I'm vulnerable. I read all sorts of things to see what the other side isn't telling me. I look for facts and corroborated evidence and original sources. I ignore opinions almost entirely. I read plenty of fake news, but I don't believe it. And quite a lot of it has been on CNN or the WaPo, not just Fox or InfoWars.

  36. Misinformation? You don't say! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I got shitloads of misinformation shoved down my throat in school, mostly in "history" classes.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  37. Harry Reid and Romney's taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank Dingy Harry for that one. Of course Saul Alinsky gets some credit as well.

  38. Like arstechnica spreading falsehoods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & Hahahaha @ arseholetechnica BLUNDERERS busted for lies https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11776235&cid=56164223/

    * Couldn't happen to a worse bunch of fucks spreading LIES about a program that was LONG AGO patched saying it wasn't libeling the programmers & company (& ars tried it on me & had their ASSES handed to them)...

    APK

    P.S.=> They're the WORST of the lot & blundering wannabes... apk

  39. Not well balanced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely no bias in that game at all. Perhaps the creators should also have a path for setting up a complete fake news network. They could call it CFN, and your job is too spread misinformation all the time.

  40. The Real Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about adding a class for all K-12 to teach/learn/discuss all kinds of Logical Fallacies?
    How many high school graduates have a full understanding of logical fallacies?
    Even if any student seems to understand a particular logical fallacy, can that student really identify the same fallacy, under different disguises?

    A good understanding of all kinds of logical fallacies is extremely important for our "social media" age (for people of all ages)!
    Wrong, illogical thinking, even manipulation attempts (using hard to detect logical fallacies) everywhere on the internet!

  41. Censorship is as old as humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, internet kills monopoly for information. If you kill freedom of speech in internet in USA then people will VPN to censorship free country. You will not stop internet. You will only create problems for Home Land Security to track users activity over internet.

    Stop that crappy way and start working on your own ideas to win back public opinion globally.

  42. Is CNN suing for copyright infringement? by ghoul · · Score: 1

    This game is revealing private trade practices which give competitive advantage to MSM. Is noone suing them?

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  43. Re:... says guy with no evidence who writes fake n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclaimer: I run a conservative leaning fake news site that makes well over $15k a month in crypto mining and ad revenue. I donate roughly $10k a month to local antifa groups around the country. I have a heavily decentralized network of authors that get paid handsomely writing for my sites.

    As much as reality hurts to acknowledge, the right is deeply mired in fiction. I too tried to play on the liberals, but I received the same treatment; on social media the stories fall apart and nobody clicks on them. Conservatives though have shared my articles over a billion times. I've even had complete bullshit I made up out of nowhere make it to Breitbart front page and Fox News. It's uncanny how manipulatable right wingers are if you touch them just right in the emotions.

    At least the money I earn goes to good causes though to continue to battle the easily manipulated, and I have a plan in place near 2018 election time to discredit a lot of conservative congressfolk in an effort to turn some votes around. With the reach I have on just one website I can probably flip some counties :)

  44. Re:Death of Steven Seagal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's not dead. but his acting career is.

  45. Re:Misinformation? You don't say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed. And ever since conservative think tanks have thrown billions of dollars at rewriting history to be more favorable to them (at least in the US), it's gotten considerably worse. Luckily my kids all have copies of Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky books, so that they can be reminded of the history the right doesn't want them to know about, that the entire rest of the world is particularly aware of.

  46. Recruiting tactic by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    All the top players will receive employment offers from the Banana Republicans!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  47. Mainstream media does not blatently lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, they tend to report some stories more than others. They focus on hype rather than substance. And they editorialize against Trump. But they do not blatantly lie. Saying that you report opinion polls which look like Trump will lose is not lying, even if they turn out to be wrong.

    Fake news, on the other hand, is blatant lies. Initially most of it came out of a town in Macedonia(!) as a way to make money from click through ads. The perpetrators were not political, just after the money. They tried both left and right wing bullshit, but found that only the right wing would swallow it. And made good money from them.

    There effectiveness encouraged more on the right to realize that truth really does not matter in the political debate and also became more blatant in their hyperbole.

    But if you will be very hard pressed to find any actual lying in the mainstream media.

  48. Re:... says guy with no evidence who writes fake n by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    True, false?

    No clue since it ias an AC who I'm promoting to visible level....

    "Disclaimer: I run a conservative leaning fake news site that makes well over $15k a month in crypto mining and ad revenue. I donate roughly $10k a month to local antifa groups around the country. I have a heavily decentralized network of authors that get paid handsomely writing for my sites.

    As much as reality hurts to acknowledge, the right is deeply mired in fiction. I too tried to play on the liberals, but I received the same treatment; on social media the stories fall apart and nobody clicks on them. Conservatives though have shared my articles over a billion times. I've even had complete bullshit I made up out of nowhere make it to Breitbart front page and Fox News. It's uncanny how manipulatable right wingers are if you touch them just right in the emotions.

    At least the money I earn goes to good causes though to continue to battle the easily manipulated, and I have a plan in place near 2018 election time to discredit a lot of conservative congressfolk in an effort to turn some votes around. With the reach I have on just one website I can probably flip some counties :)"

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.