Slashdot Mirror


FCC To Officially Rescind Net Neutrality Rules On Thursday (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: The U.S. Federal Communications Commission is expected to publish on Thursday its December order overturning the landmark Obama-era net neutrality rules, two sources briefed on the matter said Tuesday. The formal publication in the Federal Register, a government website, means state attorneys general and advocacy groups will be able to sue in a bid to block the order from taking effect. The Republican-led FCC in December voted 3-2 to overturn rules barring service providers from blocking, slowing access to or charging more for certain content. The White House Office of Management and Budget still must sign off on some aspects of the FCC reversal before it takes legal effect. Congressional aides say the publication will trigger a 60-legislative-day deadline for Congress to vote on whether to overturn the decision. U.S. Senate Democrats said in January they had the backing of 50 members of the 100-person chamber for repeal, leaving them just one vote short of a majority. The December FCC order will be made public on Wednesday and formally published on Thursday, the sources said.

17 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. More evidence that there are real differences by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    This should be more evidence that there are real and substantial differences between the Democratic and Republican parties. Yes, there are a small number of Democrat senators who aren't in favor of net neutrality, and there are a small number of Republican senators who are in favor, but the vast majority of each group have taken positions exactly as expected. There are real differences between the major political parties.

    1. Re:More evidence that there are real differences by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's some truth to that, but the real question is which party will MAGA?

      Neither one. They're both engaged in screwing it up for most people. Not for themselves, of course.

      There are definitely differences, though. The Democrats (at present) aren't as utterly corrupt as the Republicans. I suspect that'll turn around with the next pendulum swing. Because American voters just can't seem to wrap their heads around the idea that putting the rich in power will not result in a generally favorable outcome for everyone else.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:More evidence that there are real differences by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      so, BSAB argument?

      maybe you'd like to engage in some whataboutism?

      (no, both sides are NOT identically bad; and in this situation and mahy others where its business vs people, the R's clearly favor the rich business and care NOTHING for the common man. NOTHING. and their base of poor flyover states eat it up, in some kind of absurd opposite-think; afterall, anyone poor in a flyover is just 'temporarily poor' and they fully think they have every chance to be rich like their idols, though it will never happen)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:More evidence that there are real differences by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Sorry, it's theater. They have the same donors...

      So Soros is donating to Republicans and Koch Bros are donating to Democrats?

      Don't forget: Obama appointed Pai to the FCC

      Under the advisement of Mitch McConnell, who happened to have control of the Senate and would have obstructed any pick he didn't present (yes, the party of NO). But Pai's ass-hattery didn't come to the fore until Trump put him in charge as the chairman.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  2. Missed it by thaa-at much by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even though a Presidential veto and a Republican-dominated House would stand in the way of a 51 vote Senate rejection, the "one vote shy" premise is heartening on the surface... unless you consider these claims don't get held to any scrutiny.

    The Democrats are saying, "Look we are trying!" while accepting campaign contributions as fast as the Republicans from ISPs.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re: Missed it by thaa-at much by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Funny

      One side is corrupted and ashamed of it

      ...citation?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  3. Re:Banana republic!!!! by mpercy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, what one fool rams through--bypassing Congress--via his pen and his phone, the next fool can undo with his pen and his phone. A wise man once said “Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won.”

  4. It's Official! by kenh · · Score: 2

    It's the End of Days, queue Mass Hysteria - we'll look back on these days wistfully, with a tear in our eyes for the liberties lost when the FCC stopped it's nearly thousand day watch over a briefly Neutral Net...

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:It's Official! by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      No need to wait that long.

      I'm already crying because of the results of the last fuck up the FCC made several years ago, radio station consolidations.

      At the time, I didn't have an opinion one way or another, but the quality and the diversity of content has only gone downhill since then. And now, in our pay-to-play world, the music we hear on the radio is just one massive advertisement that plays over and over again until we're brainwashed into liking it.

  5. Re: 1 mbps is so awesome by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sad part is the Trump voters are the ones who are getting screwed, not the "libtards". The "libtards" tend to be upper income, so they benefit financially from corporatist policies. It is the Trump voter who gets screwed, but they are too dumb to realize it. They are going to freak out when Trump bans bump stocks.

  6. Re:1 mbps is so awesome by kenh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank the Democrat's Super Delegate system which all but forced the "Entitled" candidate to win the primaries, denying the Democrat voters their preferred choice in the 2016 Election, Sen. Bernie Sanders. In 2016 the democrats learned the lesson the Republicans mostly learned in 2008 with Sen. McCain (it was his turn, though few Republicans were enthusiastic about him as their candidate), and finally learned in 2012 when the party was divided over the religion of their candidate Gov. Romney - an eminently qualified, successful leader that was openly mocked for correctly identifying "Russia" as the greatest threat to America in the 2012 debates, only to be proven right after the 2016 election.

    Hillary ran a new kind of campaign, and in the end her over-confidence had her making what, in hindsight were some poor choices - she focused on fundraisers and massive vote advantage in the final phase of the election in states like California, while ignoring states that she felt confident she would win, only to learn her massive fundraising and popular vote advantage were meaningless when the Electoral Votes were tallied. She went home to walk in the woods, her opponent moved into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with less money raised and fewer votes cast for him - but those fewer votes were all where they needed to be.

    --
    Ken
  7. Re: 1 mbps is so awesome by thomst · · Score: 2

    An Anonymous Coward blurted:

    I'm proud I voted for Trump. I will vote him again I 2020.

    The irony of an AC trumpeting how proud he is of his vote is so thick, rich, and creamy I could cut it with a spoon ...

    --
    Check out my novel.
  8. One more thing to fix... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    after the "blue wave" takes control of Congress. The weird part is that net neutrality is good for everyone and everyone wants it (except ISPs).

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  9. Re: 1 mbps is so awesome by kenh · · Score: 2

    They are going to freak out when Trump bans bump stocks.

    No, they really aren't - most lawful gun owners are interested in convenient, accurate shooting, not "quickly spraying a room full of bullets" - the purpose of the "bump stock" it the latter, not the former.

    The "libtards" tend to be upper income

    Question, why is it that California, the Mecca of "Libtards" (your term) has the highest concentration of residents living in poverty? One in five California residents lives in poverty, the highest percentage of any of the fifty states even besting states like Mississippi, Louisiana and West Virginia.

    --
    Ken
  10. Re: 1 mbps is so awesome by gnick · · Score: 2

    ...makes the crypt keeper look attractive.

    You nailed the #1 most important quality for POTUS - Attractiveness. An ugly president is fine, but an ugly woman president? Unthinkable! I don't even give a rat's ass that our POTUS is obese; it just bugs me that he lied about it.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  11. That's fine by lexman098 · · Score: 2

    If the Trump admin can rescind the rules this quickly, the next Dem administration can just put them back.

  12. Re: 1 mbps is so awesome by Comboman · · Score: 2

    How many times can you vote from Russia?

    It depends on which voting machine you're hacking into.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.