Slashdot Mirror


Apple In Talks To Buy Cobalt Directly From Miners (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Apple Inc. is in talks to buy long-term supplies of cobalt directly from miners for the first time, according to people familiar with the matter, seeking to ensure it will have enough of the key battery ingredient amid industry fears of a shortage driven by the electric vehicle boom. The iPhone maker is one of the world's largest end users of cobalt for the batteries in its gadgets, but until now it has left the business of buying the metal to the companies that make its batteries. The talks show that the tech giant is keen to ensure that cobalt supplies for its iPhone and iPad batteries are sufficient, with the rapid growth in battery demand for electric vehicles threatening to create a shortage of the raw material. About a quarter of global cobalt production is used in smartphones. Apple is seeking contracts to secure several thousand metric tons of cobalt a year for five years or longer. Its first discussions on cobalt deals with miners were more than a year ago, and it may end up deciding not to go ahead with any deal, another person said.

6 of 58 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Who cares? by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    "Nobody's buying the iPhone X."

    Nobody? Just 30,000,000 nobodies according to Fortune Magazine's latest data:

    http://fortune.com/2018/01/23/...

    I guess you're in your own private little bubble where the real world doesn't intrude.

  2. Can't old batteries get recycled into new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's been asked, but cant old phone batteries be recycled into new ones. Sure, not one-to-one, but can't some old batteries get added to the new ones?

    If not, then this whole "renewable" energy thing is all for naught.

  3. What is Cobalt? by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    A new cryptocoin that's being mined?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  4. Re:Apple branded "private military contractors" by rmdingler · · Score: 2

    It might be easier for them to subcontract out the work, you know, to governments and such... keeps the corporate hands cleaner.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  5. Buying The Wrong Thing by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    Want to reliable purchase primary products, don't buy the product, buy the producer. Apple should simply buy the required mine, in a safe, stable reliable location to ensure it always has supply. So https://investingnews.com/dail... buy a mine in either number 3 Australia or number 4 Canada or both. You have guaranteed supply and in fact in the mine does not have to be that profitable you can futz with supplies to screw your competitors and still get it at the original price, the capital return on your mining investment. Mines are not that expensive and owning a couple one in each of the most reliable countries, would give you supplies for decades even centuries, dependent upon mine size and how much you allowed to be sold beyond your own uses, none possibly. Interesting bank, a mineral bank, buying the estimated volume of in ground resource for future use, if you are cashed up, quite a solid capital investment. Buy the mine, not the mineral that comes out of the mine and of course contract out the mining itself, so much less hassle than doing it.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  6. Good idea but bad argument by sjbe · · Score: 2

    You have guaranteed supply and in fact in the mine does not have to be that profitable you can futz with supplies to screw your competitors and still get it at the original price, the capital return on your mining investment.

    That's only true if your competition cannot get the product elsewhere. Roughly half the world's supply comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. And it's generally a bad idea to buy an asset that isn't profitable unless you have no other choice for strategic reasons. Its the same reason you can't buy an oil well and charge whatever price you want.

    Mines are not that expensive

    Where on Earth did you get that silly notion? Operating a mine is VERY expensive, Huge capital costs and even with a lot of automation a lot of labor costs too. Not to mention the danger involved. Now Apple has the money to afford it but owning and operating a mine isn't a trivial proposition.

    Your basic premise that Apple should consider buying a mine is reasonable enough but your supporting arguments aren't good ones. If cobalt is a strategic resource for Apple then buying a mine to ensure a supply is an idea worth considering even if they have to do it at a (modest) loss. The country that is the primary producer (DRC) is politically unstable and corrupt so it could make a lot of sense. There also is the fact that Apple has a huge war chest of cash that sooner or later they will need to do something with. Vertically integrating is an idea that can make a lot of sense if properly done.