Slashdot Mirror


Apple In Talks To Buy Cobalt Directly From Miners (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Apple Inc. is in talks to buy long-term supplies of cobalt directly from miners for the first time, according to people familiar with the matter, seeking to ensure it will have enough of the key battery ingredient amid industry fears of a shortage driven by the electric vehicle boom. The iPhone maker is one of the world's largest end users of cobalt for the batteries in its gadgets, but until now it has left the business of buying the metal to the companies that make its batteries. The talks show that the tech giant is keen to ensure that cobalt supplies for its iPhone and iPad batteries are sufficient, with the rapid growth in battery demand for electric vehicles threatening to create a shortage of the raw material. About a quarter of global cobalt production is used in smartphones. Apple is seeking contracts to secure several thousand metric tons of cobalt a year for five years or longer. Its first discussions on cobalt deals with miners were more than a year ago, and it may end up deciding not to go ahead with any deal, another person said.

29 of 58 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Who cares? by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    "Nobody's buying the iPhone X."

    Nobody? Just 30,000,000 nobodies according to Fortune Magazine's latest data:

    http://fortune.com/2018/01/23/...

    I guess you're in your own private little bubble where the real world doesn't intrude.

  2. Re:Sorry by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Yeah, is it bad that the first thing I thought when I read the headline was, "What kind of cryptocurrency is Cobalt?"

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. Re:Sorry by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Yeah, is it bad that the first thing I thought when I read the headline was, "What kind of cryptocurrency is Cobalt?"

    I'm sure there is one, however, just fork bitcoin and rename if there isn't....

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  4. Can't old batteries get recycled into new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's been asked, but cant old phone batteries be recycled into new ones. Sure, not one-to-one, but can't some old batteries get added to the new ones?

    If not, then this whole "renewable" energy thing is all for naught.

  5. What is Cobalt? by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    A new cryptocoin that's being mined?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:What is Cobalt? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Would you repeat that, please? The TV was on and I was abstracted.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  6. Re:Apple branded "private military contractors" by rmdingler · · Score: 2

    It might be easier for them to subcontract out the work, you know, to governments and such... keeps the corporate hands cleaner.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  7. Re:Like how Putin bought treason directly from Tru by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I think Putin is already exiled to Russia...

  8. Not a spelling mistake? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Are we sure it is miners and not minors? (also, one does not exclude the other)

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  9. Re:More child labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Probably more adults in the mine but yes apple loves to exploit workers of any age.

  10. Buying The Wrong Thing by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    Want to reliable purchase primary products, don't buy the product, buy the producer. Apple should simply buy the required mine, in a safe, stable reliable location to ensure it always has supply. So https://investingnews.com/dail... buy a mine in either number 3 Australia or number 4 Canada or both. You have guaranteed supply and in fact in the mine does not have to be that profitable you can futz with supplies to screw your competitors and still get it at the original price, the capital return on your mining investment. Mines are not that expensive and owning a couple one in each of the most reliable countries, would give you supplies for decades even centuries, dependent upon mine size and how much you allowed to be sold beyond your own uses, none possibly. Interesting bank, a mineral bank, buying the estimated volume of in ground resource for future use, if you are cashed up, quite a solid capital investment. Buy the mine, not the mineral that comes out of the mine and of course contract out the mining itself, so much less hassle than doing it.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re: Buying The Wrong Thing by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are multiple mines in Idaho that would be cheaper.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Buying The Wrong Thing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Want to reliable purchase primary products, don't buy the product, buy the producer.

      That is quite absurd. Companies reaching way beyond core-competencies such as a tech company going into mining creates huge inefficiencies (reads: expense). Then you have to wonder and care about not only the cost of acquisition, what to do with the extra resource, or even the exact opposite: how big is the resources, is it enough going forward and are we just kicking the supply problem down the road by buying *this* chunk of rock.

      Let the expert do the things they do. Let them manage multiple mines, let them explore for new resources and extract the mineral the way they know best. ... And lock them into strict legal contracts to ensure their supply ends up in your pocket.

  11. Skip that by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Buy the mines with Tesla and other companies.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Re: Will they buy from child slavers? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    2 yr old articles? Really

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  13. Re:Who cares? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    Are you nobody, too?
    Then there's a pair of us! Don't tell!
    They'd banish us, you know.

  14. Or have they tipped their hand? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    If so much cobalt is going to be used by the electric vehicle industry, wouldn't they also want a direct source if they themselves were entering that industry?

  15. Elon by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

    I think Tesla might have something to say about this.
    So what now, will we get a competitive bidding process to see who can monopolise the supply of lithium, cobalt, etc?
    Vertical integration going a little far, I fear.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  16. Finally by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    Didn't mcdonalds start there own farms years ago so they could own the cattle? I'm surprised Apple with their billions hadn't thought of this before.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  17. Makes sense by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    This appears to make sense both by itself and given Tim Cook's previous work with Apple's supply chain - like buying up inventory of many smartphone/tablet components. It could be an opportunity to address pollution and other issue with cobalt mining.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  18. Yeah! Cobalt for Sale Apple! by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    Excellent I have Cobalt Cryptocurrency to sell, been mining it for months on 100 GPUs. Oh, wait what? Mining?

  19. Re:Apple branded "private military contractors" by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 1

    I was thinking, why don't Apple just buy the whole DRC?

  20. No difference? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Are we sure it is miners and not minors? (also, one does not exclude the other)

    Depending on where they mine it it might be a distinction without a difference.

    That said I'm pretty sure Apple would be sensitive to the PR shit storm that would erupt if they were found to be directly buying from child labor slaves. I'm also sure at some level they care about the problem but caring doesn't equal solving. Apple does have the resources to deal with it (they could buy the mine) if they are so inclined but it will be interesting to see how much they really care.

  21. Good idea but bad argument by sjbe · · Score: 2

    You have guaranteed supply and in fact in the mine does not have to be that profitable you can futz with supplies to screw your competitors and still get it at the original price, the capital return on your mining investment.

    That's only true if your competition cannot get the product elsewhere. Roughly half the world's supply comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. And it's generally a bad idea to buy an asset that isn't profitable unless you have no other choice for strategic reasons. Its the same reason you can't buy an oil well and charge whatever price you want.

    Mines are not that expensive

    Where on Earth did you get that silly notion? Operating a mine is VERY expensive, Huge capital costs and even with a lot of automation a lot of labor costs too. Not to mention the danger involved. Now Apple has the money to afford it but owning and operating a mine isn't a trivial proposition.

    Your basic premise that Apple should consider buying a mine is reasonable enough but your supporting arguments aren't good ones. If cobalt is a strategic resource for Apple then buying a mine to ensure a supply is an idea worth considering even if they have to do it at a (modest) loss. The country that is the primary producer (DRC) is politically unstable and corrupt so it could make a lot of sense. There also is the fact that Apple has a huge war chest of cash that sooner or later they will need to do something with. Vertically integrating is an idea that can make a lot of sense if properly done.

    1. Re:Good idea but bad argument by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The country that is the primary producer (DRC) is politically unstable and corrupt so it could make a lot of sense.

      That makes it even worse to own the mine. Think about it for a moment - the mine could be nationalized (you lose your mine). The country could decide you're a special snowflake, and pay up billions in bribes right now, etc.

      The government is too unstable to do business with, and tin-pot dictators really can change their mind at any moment, so what was once a secure supply can be suddenly a complete writeoff.

      Presumably to help keep it from happening the chosen mines will keep quiet on who their big customer is to keep their mines secure.

  22. Re:More child labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kind of a fuckwit, aren't you? The article says: "The price of cobalt has more than tripled in the past 18 months to trade above $80,000 a metric ton. Two-thirds of supplies come from the Democratic Republic of Congo, where there has never been a peaceful transition of power and child labor is still used in parts of the mining industry."

  23. That's what I thought! by sabbede · · Score: 1
    There have been so many stories about cryptocurrencies lately that at first glance I thought they were talking about yet another one. It took a moment for me to realize they were talking about actual miners taking actual things out of the ground.

    I think I'm sick of cryptocurrencies.

  24. Re:More child labor by bigwheel · · Score: 1

    Let me guess - you read it on your Facebook page, right?

    Just a guess that parent AC read it two days ago on /.

    https://slashdot.org/story/18/...

  25. Child labor by DrYak · · Score: 1

    What relation is there with minors and the business of cobalt?

    Explaining the joke:
    It's a black humour remark about the fact that child labor is still happening a lot in the mining business in developing countries.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]