Slashdot Mirror


Amazon May Open Up To Six More Automated Stores This Year (engadget.com)

Amazon may have opened its automated convenience store a year late, but it looks like it's been a pretty big success. From a report: Recode learned that the company plans on opening six more of its Amazon Go stores in 2018. It's not clear where these stores will be located, though Recode reports that more locations are likely in Seattle, and Amazon is in talks with the developer of The Grove in Los Angeles. Amazon Go is billed as the convenience store of the future. There are no checkout lines; you can simply walk in, grab what you want, and leave. You scan in with a smartphone app, and then an AI tracks what you take from the shelves and automatically charges you for them.

82 comments

  1. AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Wow, AI tracks what you take and automatically charges you? The advances in AI are incredible! Hopefully it records the purchase in a blockchain ledger too. That would be TOO COOL.

    1. Re:AI by Revek · · Score: 1

      Its all fun and games until they pwn the store.

    2. Re:AI by geekmux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, AI tracks what you take and automatically charges you? The advances in AI are incredible! Hopefully it records the purchase in a blockchain ledger too. That would be TOO COOL.

      We can mock this technology all we want, but two facts remain; it works, and it's likely a HELL of a lot cheaper than the traditional method of purchasing and managing cashiers, baggers, and cash register hardware.

      You should expect this kind of store concept to become infectious, and not just with Amazon Would a grocery chain be willing to license this Amazon solution if it proves to be 30% cheaper than the traditional method of transaction management? You bet your ass they would, and Amazon would be stupid not to oblige.

      Cashiers make up over 3 million jobs in the US. Let's see how well we manage unemployment in 10 years, along with managing the unemployable.

    3. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for example what if CVS stores could replace all their cashiers with self-checkout stations, and just have one employee overseeing the store? CVS has been doing that over five years now. I guess they are a leader in "AI". Amazing tech!

    4. Re:AI by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      Cashiers make up over 3 million jobs in the US. Let's see how well we manage unemployment in 10 years, along with managing the unemployable.

      Well, if we can turn off the mass, continual influx of illegal immigrants, we will need US citizens to pick the fruit, etc....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:AI by suutar · · Score: 2

      We already need US citizens to pick the fruit. They don't want to. Expect fruit prices to rise as either fruit goes unpicked or picker wages increase (or both).

    6. Re:AI by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Expect fruit prices to rise as either fruit goes unpicked or picker wages increase (or both).

      I really don't have a problem with prices going up a bit.

      And frankly, why aren't the unemployment offices routing people qualified to pick fruit to the farms needing fruit pickers, rather than just handing out benefits while they sit at home?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re: AI by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      .. and cash register hardware

      Right, because the cutting-edge equipment needed to run a fully automated retail establishment is so much cheaper than ubiquitous, tried-and-true tech like fucking cash registers.

    8. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has net negative immigration.

    9. Re: AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because most people on assistance can't afford to move and the jobs are extremely short lived.

    10. Re:AI by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about legal immigration....just illegal.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re: AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labor always represents the largest risk to an organization.

    12. Re: AI by geekmux · · Score: 1

      .. and cash register hardware

      Right, because the cutting-edge equipment needed to run a fully automated retail establishment is so much cheaper than ubiquitous, tried-and-true tech like fucking cash registers.

      Uh, yes it likely is, considering they can operate 24x7x365, and won't get sick, show up late, need vacations, lie, steal, create sexual harassment lawsuits, need medical and dental insurance, etc. You seem to forget all the tried-and-true burdens of those fucking humans you'll need to hire to operate those fucking cash registers.

      And automated solutions will be far from "cutting-edge" 3-5 years from now.

    13. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in every CVS store. Some have it, some don't. Would be curious how CVS decides which to install it in and which the won't...

      There have been several places in my area that had self checkout, then removed it.

    14. Re:AI by sheramil · · Score: 2

      It's all fun and games until you go in there to buy a can of soft drink, can't find the one you want, and on your way out the system mistakenly charges you for twelve large cucumbers, a packet of condoms and an extra large bottle of Crisco.. and you can't find the tame store human to sort it out.

      And THEN you're cornered by a drone shaped like a Dalek equipped with a taser, and the drone growls in an ED-209 voice, "Put down the, $tables_Xref, you have $timer_what_the_hell_fill_this_in_later_dude_its_never_gonna_happen seconds to comply".

  2. Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Traditional retail stores of all types have a certain percentage of merchandise that gets shoplifted, they all just factor that into expected profit and loss.

    But in this kind of store, it's literally impossible to shoplift because there are so many cameras monitoring product - the loss from AI not realizing you had picked up something is probably substantially smaller than shoplifting.

    All you need to do is make sure people really scan in before they enter... was not sure how that aspect worked.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      True. It is impossible to shoplift when cameras are present.

    2. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by jarkus4 · · Score: 2

      You also need to handle:
      - people that put the product back on the shelve
      - people that put the product back on the WRONG shelve (by laziness or mistake)
      - people that pick up this wrongly placed product and complain its price doesn't match the one on the shelves
      - people that try to cheat system by putting something similar to the product on the shelve

      and probably a million other strange cases. Maybe amazon will suceed where others failed, but I wouldnt hold my breath.

    3. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe they could invent something like a sticker to put on the product that used radio frequencies to communicate with a system to track stuff. With AI.

    4. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      - people who pee on the floor
      - people who open packages and use the product right there in the store
      - kids grabbing things off the shelves

      There are about a bajillion things that could happen in a store that none of this silliness has accounted for. We are decades away from having employee-less retail stores. This is just a dumb PR stunt to keep the dumb Amazon customers drooling.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. It is impossible to shoplift when cameras are present.

      Well, not quite. But it can get silly. In our break room we have self-serve convenience store items; you're supposed to check out your items at a kiosk, and the whole area is covered with 20 cameras in case you decide to walk off with stuff. The funny part? The sign saying that the cameras are there "for our protection".
      Yes, I'm sure someone's going to break into our building and mug employees in the break room. Not the ones sitting at tables, just the ones browsing the merchandise, of course.

    6. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by Hentes · · Score: 1

      First of all, I don't think there's much "AI" going on in those stores. As far as I know it's more of a combination of pressure sensors and Amazon's own QR code like hieroglyphs read by the cameras. The image recognition is mostly there to track the buyers, not the products. Which is the real reason why these stores can work: you have to authenticate yourself each time you enter a store, which means that if you keep shoplifting it's not going to be hard for Amazon to connect the dots and realize how a suspicious amount of stuff tends to go missing at the same time you have visited the stores in question. After they got you suspect, they can easily check the footage for evidence (even more easily with the facetracking). Now shoplifting alone isn't a very serious offence, but because of the authentication, Amazon can ban you from their stores for life, which is a pretty big deterrent not to mention an almost perfect method to get rid of repeat offenders.

    7. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, it would be very easy to shoplift. Ever heard of flash mobs and balaclavas? Happen even in human-run stores with cameras like 7/11.

      In and out before the automated system has a chance to contact the cops.

    8. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by sexconker · · Score: 1

      But in this kind of store, it's literally impossible to shoplift because there are so many cameras monitoring product

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      If Amazon opens one of these stores up in an urban area, it will be hit on a regular basis.
      If Amazon ever truly makes these stores unmanned (the current test store has staff crawling all over), they won't even be able to get anyone on robbery charges, as robbery requires a human victim. They'd only ever be able to chase down lesser charges like theft and destruction of property.

    9. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this 1 up. And the cameras still cant see through people. So shoplifting alone may be a thing of the past, but having a group "browsing" while blocking the camera is not exactly out of the question.

      Also, what happens when someone claims they put a product back but the charge wasn't removed as a scam?

    10. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so peel the sticker and put that back on the shelf. Or have an aluminum foil lined shopping bag. etc.

    11. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are decades away from having employee-less retail stores.

      I didn't RTFA. Are they TRYING to make the store "employee-less" or just automating checkout?

    12. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by lgw · · Score: 1

      The whole point is they're not suing RFID stickers - those suckers aren't cheap. They're using cameras (and some other sensors in the shelves), with facial recognition and some sort of recognition of how much you take off the shelf.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:Seems like a good idea, better loss figures by sheramil · · Score: 2

      Yes, I'm sure someone's going to break into our building and mug employees in the break room. Not the ones sitting at tables, just the ones browsing the merchandise, of course.

      I wonder how the Amazon store would deal with a flash crowd of about a hundred people all dressed like the tame store human?

  3. more expensive garbage for the rich. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not clear where these stores will be located

    Hint: You wont find them in Inglewood. These stores will show up some place with a lot of upper middle class white people who dont mind paying more to avoid the usual drolls of a convenience store. homeless beggars arent slumped against the side of the building, and there isnt a stench of fetid trash from the parking lot.

    convenience store of the future

    Ive been to a go store. theres about a 30-40% markup from what you might find at a CVS or 7 eleven. they dont take cash , they dont sell fresh fruit, and everything is armoured in plastic wrap and polystyrene to ensure it gets a good barcode or nfc sensor. Its the future, if the future came with a "no poor people" label. Security stands at the ready by the door and many items are out of stock.
    Go is a branded lifestyle experience, not a convenience store.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone is equally useful. In the past, those people would die. It is the natural order of things.

    2. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why Inglewood can't have nice things, and it's not because the Amazon execs are mustache-twirling fatcats.

    3. Re: more expensive garbage for the rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It is very unnatural to evolve brain and develop culture to care for everyone around, to educate - just so it would not be a shit place like in some stupid jungle in stupid shitty hindustan.

    4. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the more "we got cash to burn" attending these stores, the more homeless beggars and other opportunists you will find hoping to get some benefit of that sweet, sweet white guilt. the same guilt that will "tolerate" more of the stench so they don't appear to themselves to be the people they're so "activist" about hating on.

      The more throwaway cash an area has, the more campsites pop up. Why do people flock from all over the US and the world to be "homeless" in Silicon Valley? Because they got people who have disposable cash and lots of guilt everywhere handing out 5s and 20s at intersections to sign holders on the median.

    5. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      True, and the most useless idiots are the anonymous cowards. They will be eliminated first.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by greenwow · · Score: 1

      > handing out 5s and 20s

      Same here in Seattle. I'm always shocked at my coworkers and friends that don't give ones. They usually give a $20!

    7. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >giving anything at all

      There is a reason why you don't feed the animals: it creates a dependent population which is a health hazard and costly mess.

    8. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Most people in Seattle don't carry cash, actually. At best it's like 10 percent of us.

      And before you try to guilt me, I donate to actual deductible non-profits that provide services like actual housing and sundries to homeless youth and women. A higher percentage of my income than Bill Gates does, actually.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    9. Re:more expensive garbage for the rich. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      And before you try to guilt me, I donate to actual deductible non-profits that provide services like actual housing and sundries to homeless youth and women.

      Oh, then there must be no homeless youth or children in Seattle...

      Oh wait, there are?

      I hope you have looked carefully into what the people you are giving money are actually doing, Too many cities spend more and more on the homeless every year with zero apparent effect, because all of that money is siphoned of on "administrative costs". It's often better to give to shelters directly...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Define "pretty big success" by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Didn't this store just open a few weeks ago? Check back in a year before calling it a "big success". While it may turn out to be one, right now it's just a curiosity.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Define "pretty big success" by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're measuring the success by the size of the store.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  5. They handle that by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Look up articles on the store. The AI already handles ALL of those cases except for price confusion.

    You can verify the prices of all items as you pick them up, or put them back if you think it's wrong. I think they price items individually, not on the shelves below, so I can't see where you could get very confused...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They handle that by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You can verify the prices of items? AND put them back? Geez, I love living in the future!

    2. Re:They handle that by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes AND leave the store without having to interact with a cashier or use a badly designed self-checkout station that takes two minutes to properly classify the bananas you bought.

      Such a shame small-minded people like yourself cannot imagine even the simplest of improvements this will bring, you can practically see the vibrations from the gears in your head attempting to turn but failing.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:They handle that by DogDude · · Score: 0

      without having to interact with a cashier

      I hope you're getting some professional help. It sounds like you've got some sort of anti-social disorder. Most people wouldn't consider not having to interact with a cashier as a positive.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:They handle that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me its not the interacting with the cashier, its the load of people in front of me with carts full of groceries that I dont want to wait behind, not to mention they still in this day and age take a further five minutes to write out a check and dont start it until they get the total.

    5. Re:They handle that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just conducted an informal poll of everyone in my office and all but one agreed that they hate interacting with cashiers and choose the self checkout whenever possible. So, it appears that you're wrong. Or old. Or both?

  6. Ha Ha but wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    True. It is impossible to shoplift when cameras are present.

    It is when every item is in clear view of multiple cameras. The system knows you went by an area and that items are no longer there. It doesn't matter if it saw you take it specifically.

    Your semi-humorous sarcastic comment is usually accurate because traditional cameras (A) do not fully cover a store, and (B) are not fully monitored as to actions seen. A camera may record theft but if no-one is watching the person gets away despite the camera. With the Amazon store, anything you pick up, by any means is charged to your account because Amazon also knows the identity of every single person in the store and can see all items clearly from multiple angles.

    As I said, the only possible weakness is if you can get in without scanning in. But I'm pretty sure they control entry since that needs to work 100% to charge people correctly.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Ha Ha but wrong by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the cameras aren't recognizing "this guy is stealing", right? It is just a system like CVS has had for years, but hooked to a smartphone app. Do you think these are "AI cameras"?

    2. Re:Ha Ha but wrong by lgw · · Score: 1

      It is just a system like CVS has had for years, but hooked to a smartphone app.

      Wait, do you understand how this actually works? It's not self-checkout, and there are no RFIDs or anything like that.. The cameras really do follow your every move, and you get charged for whatever you take out of the store. I have some friends who were in on the beta, and they played all kinds of games with it - picking stuff out, carrying it around, putting it back, taking it again later, all that sort of stuff. It was remarkably accurate.

      It's not obvious how you'd shoplift, beyond simply not scanning in at the door. There's probably something possible with camera placement, obscuring views, and sleight-of-hand, but there are a lot of cameras and I'm sure they thought about that.

      I for one welcome our checkout-free overlords.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  7. Sigh by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    people who pee on the floor

    If they have stockers would they not have janitors for inevitable breakage??? Gee, I wonder what ELSE they could clean???

    people who open packages and use the product right there in the store

    Go right ahead, as soon as you do you just bought it. Why is this any different a problem from today, except this system can actually recognize and charge these people on the spot????

    kids grabbing things off the shelves

    Wow it is like SO VERY HARD to tell if someone entered the store with someone they should all be charged to the same account. If they have nearly infallible identity tracking already for all people in store, why on earth would you even mention this as a problem when it knows who has entered the store together??????

    Most of the "issues" you and others reference are in fact covered by this illuminating XKCD comic.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. modern decadence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not everyone is equally useful. In the past, those people would die. It is the natural order of things.

    no, these people are sent into the fields to pull weeds and harvest vegetables

    it's the psychopaths like you that we leave naked in the forest

    1. Re:modern decadence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, these people are sent into the fields to pull weeds and harvest vegetables

      Democrats already have a slave class of illegal aliens to do that.

    2. Re:modern decadence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, these people are sent into the fields to pull weeds and harvest vegetables

      Democrats already have a slave class of illegal aliens to do that.

      sorry, loser, it's red states where the "citizens" are too lazy to pick the crops

    3. Re:modern decadence by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Are they lazy? Or is it because the wages for farmhands are so depressed due to the illegal work force that no one can do that job legitimates (with taxes, for example) and actually earn any money?

    4. Re:modern decadence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reuters says: Jul 17, 2017 - The U.S. government cleared the way on Monday for thousands more foreign workers to enter the country under temporary seasonal visas, just as President Donald Trump declared this "Made In America" week and pledged to stand up for U.S. workers.

      Illegal my ass. The workers are brought in specifically to undermine wages of American workers and reduce costs for corporate owners.

    5. Re:modern decadence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      loser

      You Democrats and your projection, it's comical how you don't live in the real world. I don't see Hillary in the White House.

  9. If you are always charged there is no theft by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You do realize that the cameras aren't recognizing "this guy is stealing", right?

    How is it theft if that person is charged for any item they take from the store? You seem to not understand fundamental aspects of what Amazon is doing.

    You literally cannot steal if you are always charged for items taken (or consumed to address another idiotic point).

    It is just a system like CVS has had for years, but hooked to a smartphone app.

    It is nothing like that whatsoever, in any aspect. Do you honestly not realize the difference? You don't seem to understand even the slightest but about how the Amazon system works. It knows when any item is removed. It knows who has the item. It knows who every single person in the store is and can charge them for anything, because every single person in the store had to basically log in to enter with an Amazon account, to which all items it knows you have are charged.

    Since you seem so confused on this point, let me paint a picture. Someone enters the store, and craftily palms and item from the shelf. As soon as he moves away maybe ten or so cameras know the item is gone, know who it was next to the item. Even if none of the cameras saw his hand touch it the system knows that person has the item in question. When he leaves the store, item carefully longed down underwear, the system charges him whatever that item cost...

    Just what aspect of this whole system did you not grasp?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:If you are always charged there is no theft by sexconker · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking moron.

      People will enter the stores WITHOUT cell phones, accounts, or other means of charging them or tracking their identity.
      People will remove items from the shelves in ways that CANNOT be tracked by the sensors.

      And if you can't imagine how either of the above can be done, people will smash windows and raid the whole fucking place because they can.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:If you are always charged there is no theft by gnick · · Score: 1

      People will enter the stores WITHOUT cell phones, accounts, or other means of charging them or tracking their identity.

      If only there was a way to control who enters... If we can solve that problem, we can start charging people to ride the subway too.

      ...people will smash windows and raid the whole fucking place because they can.

      Which is why every store is robbed every night when there's nobody there.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  10. Reality says yes, yes they do by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Most people wouldn't consider not having to interact with a cashier as a positive.

    First of all, Wow on that collection of negatives and positives.

    Secondly, when you go to any store that features self-checkout is it usually busy or not?

    "Most people would not", indeed. I guess you enjoy waiting in lines and inane conversation and implicit judgement of every item you buy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Reality says yes, yes they do by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Best of luck. I hope you get some help.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  11. By design, shoplifting not possible by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Finally, someone who has actually done some reading and understand how the stores work.

    Now shoplifting alone isn't a very serious offence, but because of the authentication

    Here's the thing; in this system there is no shoplifting. Because to the system, all intent of taking a product is gone - it has been reduced to the system itself realizing someone has taken a product and charging them.

    There is no difference to the system between someone picking up an item with an intent to steal, or an intent the purchase. The system has to be able to detect a person has the item no matter how they took it to begin with, because even the most innocent person may simply pick up an item in a way difficult to detect. That's why someone repeatedly taking items without being charged would not be banned, the video would be studied instead to understand how they took the items without being properly charged for them, because it would be the fault of the system they were not charged.

    In a normal store shoplifting is possible because someone unknown can enter a store and leave without paying. But in the Amazon store, the system knows every person in the store, is capable of charging any person in the store. So any failure to charge a customer for an item in an Amazon automated store is a system failure, not theft. The whole idea is you can pick up anything and simply leave with it, so it is not possible to steal as long as every customer has to log in when entering (bypassing that would be the only way true theft would be possible but even there it is a design flaw to allow entry without authentication and identification).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. BSST by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In and out before the automated system has a chance to contact the cops.

    How did they enter the store again? You have to use the application and your Amazon login to enter the store. I hope the poor sap who let the mob in enjoyed everything they took being charged to his account. From Amazon's standpoint, a flash mob entering the store and not being charged is a system flaw, not shoplifting.

    Ok, the mob could smash the window and go in that way. But at that point you are not "shoplifting" you are "looting".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:BSST by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Walk in through the exit, jump the gates or push in through an open gate as someone is walking out. How do people enter the subway without scanning their fare card? Same way.

    2. Re:BSST by lgw · · Score: 1

      They do have a security guard. They'll probably always have to, for just those reasons.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  13. self checkout makes it hard Prosecute shoplifting by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    self checkout makes it hard to Prosecute shoplifting as someone can say did not scan right.

  14. Sorry but I'm the only one making any sense by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    People will enter the stores WITHOUT cell phones, accounts, or other means of charging them or tracking their identity.

    In the existing stores that would mean hopping a turnstile while also avoiding a guard monitoring the turnstiles. A lot more at stake than just entering the traditional store and leaving with an item in the coat.

    People will remove items from the shelves in ways that CANNOT be tracked by the sensors.

    How does that work exactly? How do you remove an item without being tracked when there are pressure sensors and ten cameras looking at each item continuously? As soon as an item is off the shelf the store knows. It also knows who you are from entry.

    The problem with your assertion is that if the item can be removed without the sensors noticed, that also means non-shoplifters would not get charged in some cases if they picked up an item in the same way. Because the store exists, that means it can accurately charge people picking up items, which means you cannot shoplift.

    people will smash windows and raid the whole fucking place because they can.

    Which is not shoplifting and has other defenses possible. Go ahead and try and discover what they are.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  15. Exactly my point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    self checkout makes it hard to Prosecute shoplifting as someone can say did not scan right.

    There is no scanning anything in the Amazon store, you scan YOURSELF to allow entry, that is it. You pick up what you want and leave the store, that is it.

    So like I said shoplifting as we know it is not possible with this store because the point is that you are supposed to just pick up items and go. A failure to charge is on the system, not you. Even if you get out without paying for something that literally cannot be your fault, and is not stealing, much less shoplifting.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Exactly my point by lgw · · Score: 1

      So like I said shoplifting as we know it is not possible

      I wouldn't quite go that far. It's going to take someone pretty clever to manage it, but we live in a world where people can open a slot machine, replace the ROM, and close it again in the couple of seconds before the alarm sounds. Still, as long as the effort to shoplift something is higher than just getting a job, I'd guess the problem will be minimal.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  16. Fricking convenience store by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I'm not paying $2 to Amazon for "raw water" no matter how much you make it look "tech".

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  17. Only changing issue is securing entry by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If Amazon opens one of these stores up in an urban area, it will be hit on a regular basis.

    If they choose to open it in a more questionable area populated by a bunch of Slashdot reading crime-minded scum, they could simply have greater control over access.

    The existing store has turnstiles and staff monitoring entry to turn back people without accounts, but it's not hard to imagine something like a revolving door that will not move until you have logged in, with an armed guard on the other side as backup for someone trying to break (or hack) the door.

    Preventing people from smashing store windows to get in is something people in a lot of bad areas have figured out already for quite some time. It's not like bars over windows are hard.

    The fundamental idea is sound, guard access and allow only known customers to enter the store that can be automatically charged for whatever they take.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Only changing issue is securing entry by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Except hiring guards instead of cashiers is more expensive and defeats the entire purpose of having an unmanned store. And it won't prevent theft.

  18. Aptly Named by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I hope you get some help.

    Says the man whose first thought on thinking of an automated store is "what if I choose to pee on the floor".

    I guess there's a pretty good reason you choose your handle to be DogDude.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Aptly Named by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I've spent the past few decades in retail. People are gross and will do unimaginable things.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  19. That is not the purpose by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Except hiring guards instead of cashiers

    I am pretty sure hiring one guard is a lot less expensive than three or four checkout personnel. There is a lot of per-person employment overhead in terns of paperwork and taxes.

    defeats the entire purpose of having an unmanned store.

    Incorrect, since the PRIMARY purpose is to make the store more convenient for the shopper, meaning more repeat business. It's not about eliminating people, the whole store concept is around how they can make shopping easier and better for people (and at the same time draw in more people to using Amazon in general).

    And it won't prevent theft.

    If the only people to enter the store are people who authenticate with an Amazon account, then theft will be dramatically reduced compared to the levels stores see today (which was my original point in my very first post on this subject).

    Someone who is authenticated LITERALLY CANNOT STEAL. The only error that may occur is the system not properly charging someone, but over time they will figure out what leads to the system not charging as it should and correct them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. Things people will try by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    Don't they have strain gauges on the shelves too?

    How about people swapping for empty containers? (With dirt or water in it for weight.)

    Excuse me, I can't reach that, could you pass it to me?

  21. I've been to a go store... it sucks by ZipprHead · · Score: 1

    I'm honestly not sure who they are catering too or what the business case is.

    #1 They still need staff to monitor the alcohol and make sure everyone is over 21
    #2 They still need staff to stock shelves
    #3 They still need staff to help you find whatever
    #4 They still need staff to prevent you from walking in without identifying yourself (namely, the GO phone app)
    #5 There is so much technology embedded in the ceiling that I have a hard time if will ever pay for itself
    #6 Like all things from Amazon, everything is covered in this horrid packaging. I would rather buy my carrots or broccoli without it being wrapper in styrofoam.

    NO THANK YOU.

  22. Sounds familiar by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    *Holds fake box of Rice-O-Roni stuffed with dirt*
    *Looks at real box of Rice-O-Roni on shelf, rubs chin, adds a half-handful of dirt to fake box*
    *Three more cameras swivel my way*
    *Quickly swaps real and fake boxes, nothing happens*
    *Starts to walk slowly away, smile spreading across face*
    *Ominous rumble from back of room, dust starts shaking from ceiling*
    *Start running for exit as giant Echo Dot rolls from storage area, crushing shelves, employees and other customers as it accelerates towards me while Alexa screams something in Celtic*

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. I heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that some Whole Foods stores have a bit of spare shelf space.