Qualcomm's Simulated 5G Tests Shows How Fast Real-world Speeds Could Actually Be (theverge.com)

At Mobile World Congress, Qualcomm demonstrated the real-world potential of 5G by sharing findings of extensive network simulations it has conducted over the past several months. From a report: Instead of just offering guesses as to the gigabit-plus speeds that 5G technology could one day offer, Qualcomm's tests modeled real-world conditions in Frankfurt and San Fransisco, based on the location of existing cell sites and spectrum allocations in the two cities. The simulations factor in conditions like geography, different user demands on the network, a wide spectrum of devices with various levels of LTE and 5G connectivity for different speeds in order to accurately give an idea of what to expect when these networks launch. Additionally, the simulations are intended only to show the kind of 5G NR (New Radio) networks that could feasibly exist next year -- the non-standalone networks built in tandem with existing 4G LTE technology, not the truly standalone 5G networks that will come later on.

The Frankfurt simulation is the more basic network, based on 100 MHz of 3.5GHz spectrum with an underlying gigabit-LTE network on 5 LTE spectrum bands, but the results are still staggering. Browsing jumped from 56 Mbps for the median 4G user to more than 490 Mbps for the median 5G user, with roughly seven times faster response rates for browsing. Download speeds also improved dramatically, with over 90 percent of users seeing at least 100 Mbps download speeds on 5G, versus 8 Mbps on LTE.

Comments

Wow

[ico2]

How useful, to be able to reach my data limit in just over 30 seconds!

Still not even 4G

[nasch]

Browsing jumped from 56 Mbps for the median 4G user to more than 490 Mbps for the median 5G user

So, we'll still be waiting for actual 4G speeds. Maybe "6G" or "7G" will finally meet the standards for 4G.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Re:Still not even 4G

[alvinrod]

But the congestion is also tied to the throughput. If a user can transmit more data in a given time slice they can finish sooner (or require fewer time slices to get their data) which makes it faster for the next person to get what they want and they're able to get that a little bit faster as well. The faster you can clear out someone waiting, the more it keeps people from piling up.

However, this assumes that data use is fixed and we know from history that as more bandwidth becomes available, consumption increases as well. Eventually though we're likely to reach a point where demand for more data doesn't scale in step with availability, but I think that this will help out considerably until people find new ways to consume mobile data.

Don't need faster. Need more reliable.

[DogDude]

I don't need faster cell or wired Net service. I need more reliable. Faster without reliability is useless to me.