Slashdot Mirror


Kali Linux For WSL Now Available in the Windows Store (microsoft.com)

You can now download and install Kali Linux via the Windows Store. From a blog post on MSDN: Our community expressed great interest in bringing Kali Linux to WSL in response to a blog post on Kali Linux on WSL. We are happy to officially introduce Kali Linux on WSL.

32 of 69 comments (clear)

  1. Re:who cares by Train0987 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Agreed. What does this have to do with Trump and The Russians!?

  2. WSL?? by ebcdic · · Score: 2

    What is WSL? From Google, it seems to be the World Surf League.

    1. Re:WSL?? by sqorbit · · Score: 2

      Windows Subsystem For Linux https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Sent from my TARDIS
    2. Re:WSL?? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Kali
      Linux
      Windows Store
      World Surfing League

      Seems legit.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:WSL?? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      An indication that you don't read Slashdot enough.
      https://slashdot.org/index2.pl...

    4. Re:WSL?? by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      "One of these things is not like the other." Sing it with me.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  3. for those wondering what it is by nimbius · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kali Linux is a Debian-derived Linux distribution designed for digital forensics and penetration testing. Arguably, anyone who needed Kali linux would be intelligent enough to install it on its own workstation. cobbling a well supported and powerful standalone Linux distribution together with the haggard proprietary burro of Microsoft Windows serves no immediate purpose other than bragging rights. At best its a desperate plea from Redmond to get professionals to treat the windows store seriously. At worst, its the same chair-flinging all-hands-on-deck histrionics we've come to expect from a company thats typically 2-4 years too late to the party but inexplicably keeps hucking resources at their version of an already established technology until quietly shuffling it under the rug ten years later after multiple dismal quarterly performances that were floated along by x-box life support cash and the ever predictable licensing fees from major corporate customers.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:for those wondering what it is by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      cobbling a well supported and powerful standalone Linux distribution together with the haggard proprietary burro of Microsoft Windows serves no immediate purpose other than bragging rights.

      And getting around the IT department blocking anything that isn't a Windows machine.

      If your response to the above comment is along the lines of "That's stupid! Get better IT people!", I don't get consulted on the hiring of executives, nor get veto power over the C_Os issuing edicts.

    2. Re:for those wondering what it is by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      I would have had FIRST POST, except as I typed my magnum opus windows rebooted to install updates. At least I wasn't in front of 200 people doing a presentation like last month.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:for those wondering what it is by Teun · · Score: 1

      Nonono, Kali might be console based but it is Linux on a Desktop.
      But building a house on such shaky foundations is still questionable.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:for those wondering what it is by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      >> except as I typed my magnum opus windows rebooted to install updates...

      Speak to the team responsible for pushing your Windows Updates. There are options to nag you to reboot the machine many times before it is force rebooted. There is no *technical* reason they should be rebooting out from under you unless you've ignored and snoozed and deferred a bunch of times.

    5. Re:for those wondering what it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you want to install Kali and you are not part of the IT department that makes the decisions on what gets installed, you should not have the ability to install Kali.

      Kali, like Linux or any other piece of software, when unmanaged in the whole structure of the security stance an organization has is a security threat. Either you have the ability to install what you like security wise because that is your job or you should never have the right to install such things.

      You can pretend to be an information security professional in your off time. Doing it at work makes more problems for those of us that actually are security professionals.

    6. Re:for those wondering what it is by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You'd have a far better user experience running VirtualBox on Windows with Linux as a guest than you would with WSL

      Bridged network shows there is a non-Windows machine on the network, and NAT isn't exactly ideal for a network tool.

    7. Re:for those wondering what it is by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      If you want to install Kali and you are not part of the IT department that makes the decisions on what gets installed, you should not have the ability to install Kali.

      In the real world, there are people who are paid to develop and test products that are sold to other parties. Shockingly enough, the people that do this work are not the network administrators.

      You can pretend to be an information security professional in your off time. Doing it at work makes more problems for those of us that actually are security professionals.

      Wow, you sound exactly like the wonderful executives that came up with the Windows only edict.

  4. Who uses Kali Linux? by wed128 · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone use Kali over just using Debian and adding the packages they need? Is it some kind of 1337 H/\X0R cred thing?

    1. Re:Who uses Kali Linux? by jetkust · · Score: 1

      Kali is generally meant to be run live as far as I know. So having all the packages installed is important.

    2. Re:Who uses Kali Linux? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kali is very quiet. When you fire up Wireshark or TCPDump you don't have to go turn a bunch of things off to get to a noiseless trace.

    3. Re:Who uses Kali Linux? by ruir · · Score: 1

      All the haxor tools are built in *a fucked up* distribution.
      There, fixed it up for ya.

    4. Re:Who uses Kali Linux? by ruir · · Score: 1

      Maybe the other distros are not so quiet, because you install a lot of things...Kali does not activate too many things, and is a botched job.

  5. That's nice by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    Now where's Fedora!?

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  6. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WSL doesn't currently support raw sockets, so you can't really do a pen-test from WSL. This feels like script kiddie pandering.

  7. Re:Probably still no sound or desktop. by wed128 · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of distributions targeted at "People who want to learn and use Linux". This one is targeted at a different group of users. And that's OK.

  8. Subejcto by Xenolith0 · · Score: 1

    Well, that seems pointless to me. For most of the tools in Kali you need to power of the Linux Kernel to directly control hardware like the wifi card. e.g. Kali/aireplay isn't very useful if you can put the interface into promiscuous mode.

  9. Kali by PPH · · Score: 1

    A ten-armed god with her hands on everything.

    No thanks. I'm already not running systemd for similar reasons.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Restrictions are in Place to Download Kali Linux by Ensign_Expendable · · Score: 1

    You must be wearing a black hoodie at all times.

  11. Some explain this to me by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Why the hell would I bother using some faux-Linux subsystem that runs under Windows? Isn't it just (excuse the unintentional pun) window-dressing at that point, making you feel falsely safe and cozy in your linux-wallpapered room inside the Microsoft prison? Won't there still be 'telemetry' (read as: spyware) and the usual Microsoft hegemony regardless?

  12. Why care... by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    Why care? Because this is step 1 of 3.

    Step 1: Embrace.

    Just two more to go.

    I recommend The Scorpion and the Frog for further reading.

  13. Re:Huh? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points for this AC:

    >> "Kali Linux is a Debian-derived Linux distribution designed for digital forensics and penetration testing."
    >
    >Kali Linux (previously known as BackTrack) has nothing to do with MSDN other than someone at Microsoft mentioning it now for the first time after 5 years of development that had nothing to do with Microsoft. It continues to be maintained by Offensive Security, an organization with no ties to Microsoft other than teaching people how to break Microsoft products (along with everyone else's). It's certainly not a "Windows offering" any more than vim is a Windows offering.
    >
    > That said, if you don't already know the name Kali Linux, you probably don't work in infosec, and therefore are probably correct in your assumption regarding the number of fucks you should give about this news. Thanks for sharing with the class.

    Reposting for visibility.

     

  14. New for Nerds? by bankman · · Score: 1

    This is so far removed from this site's original concept...

    --
    I feel so sig.
  15. Re:Yea, right by Jerry · · Score: 1

    NOT if it is running on top of Win10. That's like bolting a Pratt & Whitney Turbine to the frame of a Cessna 152.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  16. Re:Microsoft strategy? by ruir · · Score: 1

    With something as bad as Kali? Maybe they are just trying to think all Linux distros suck big time.

  17. Re:Building a fortress on a swamp with sink holes! by ruir · · Score: 1

    Kali is braindead. Secure? Your coffee machine is also secure....