Slashdot Mirror


Time To Bring Back the Software User Conference (zdnet.com)

Holger Mueller, writing for ZDNet (condensed for space): Every tech company has a user conference these days. And is it just me, or are they all starting to feel the exact same? Same announcements, same message, same speakers, same venue. Rinse, repeat. On top of this sameness, irrelevant gimmicks and lack of substance threaten to drag the tech user conference into obsolescence. But all is not lost. Here are a few areas in which tech conferences are going astray, and a few ideas about how to fix them.

It's about the product. Users attend conferences to learn more about a vendor's software. So product needs to get a lot of air time. Yes, services matter too-but it's the product that people have taken time out of their busy schedules to learn about.
Have a motivational speaker who matters.
Demo software. Many attendees are expert users. Vendors need to demonstrate they, too, are experts with their own product. The best way to do this is to demo the product.
Subject expertise beats celebrity. Yes, user conferences are about inspiration, but a celebrity, soap opera star, or a talk show host is not something an enterprise software user can relate to their work and is definitely not why they spend 3-4 days and a few thousand dollars/euros to attend a conference.
Limit the philanthropy. It's great for vendors to give back to a purpose outside of the software. But it should not be 50 percent of a keynote.
Users want to network. Vendors should give users a chance to network. Not just informally, but in a planned way.
Party hard but responsibly.

43 comments

  1. Not apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sotware products, not smartphone apps.

  2. Somehow attract serious attendees by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All those dead are good, but one problem I've noticed at conferences in recent years is, it seems like a lot of attendees are not fully into the material.

    Conferences would probably be better if they were smaller but more dedicated. That would limit networking a little bit, but if you had smaller and more regional conferences the quality and usefulness of networking would probably be higher.

    I also think most software (development and use) conferences could use a LOT more hands-on training opportunity. You can get a ton of videos on development or using any software these days, so to me real value that brings me to a conference is (A) to get to speak directly to developers to provide feedback and ideas, or (b) to be able to have some hands on the wit truly expert users who can help me with problems I may be having, by working with me in person.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Somehow attract serious attendees by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Why do I keep getting training videos for software? I'm clearly a guy who decided as a career I want to look at a text editor. Why are you going to make me sit through a video as opposed to a well written document.

      I'm joking, I know why. Cause a bad video sounds better to your boss than good text, and is much cheaper to make.

      Live is a different story. Being able to ask questions is super important.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Somehow attract serious attendees by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Conferences would probably be better if they were smaller but more dedicated. That would limit networking a little bit, but if you had smaller and more regional conferences the quality and usefulness of networking would probably be higher.

      The Wordpress community does this somewhat well. From the point of view of the Wordpress end user, I'd say that WordCamps do an excellent job.

      It's unfortunate they don't offer as much which covers the administration end, which could be useful to those of us who have to manage these installations. Certainly there's lots of info out there on the web... but I've found, when it comes to most any type of tech work I've had to do, I've learned as much (or more) just talking to other admins as I've learned from reading.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Somehow attract serious attendees by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      For development I usually prefer documents as well, but for using software I often find video more quick ro process and descriptive, because you can see things they are doing they might forget to be writing down or simply not realize they are doing.

      Video of talks at development conferences can be useful for similar reasons, they mention something offhand that wouldn't go into a document but is useful.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Somehow attract serious attendees by John+Da'+Baddest · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're a prime candidate to lead the keynote on Wordpress Admin! When can I sign up to attend?

  3. Incoming donglegate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see the lawsuits piling up from here, and you haven't even made a conference yet!

  4. Party hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ly! Nut cases party hard.

  5. A great way to get work done. by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    These user conferences are not about software, it is about bigwigs to go and make contacts. While us working folks, can get our work done uninterrupted.

    The last time I been to one of these, I had more interest looking at the other vendors booths to see what they are doing and where the market is shifting. The actual speeches and stuff, were just a wast of time.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:A great way to get work done. by aberglas · · Score: 1

      The last time I been to one of these, I had more interest looking at the other vendors booths to see what they are doing and where the market is shifting.

      So you got good value out of the conference. That is what they are for, to find out where the industry is going. And for us Engineers, it is good to stick out head up out of the cubicle from time to time.

      The other major reason to go is, of course, to pick up the free tee shirts. I save a small fortune on clothes. (Actually, a tiny fortune compared to what my wife spends...)

  6. So close... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    ... Party hard but responsibly.

    Everything was going fine, but then they had to add those last two words!

    More seriously, I've seen too many people completely non-functional the second/third day of a conference because they drank too much the night before. And these are adults who should know better (although my guess is the kids just managed to hold the same amount, or more, of liquor better.) Don't go crazy just because [large tech company] is picking up the tab.

    In seriousness, the author goes to 40+ conferences a year. Of course he has very different requirements from people who go to 1 or 2. You see this in anyone whose business involves going to a lot shows like this.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  7. Software isn't sold to users by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it's sold to management. When it to sales know your audience. If a guy comes into a truck dealer with a hot wife and he's looking for a $15k plain white work truck you ignore him and sell the wife a $60,000 Cadillac.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Software isn't sold to users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that. Tesla sold me a bog standard model S, but my wife has a reservation for a new Roadster.
      Yes, she's hot.

    2. Re:Software isn't sold to users by John+Da'+Baddest · · Score: 1

      (But do you also make Firefox Quantum Plug-ins?)

  8. What industry? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    What industry are you in? Automotive has them

  9. No wonder by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Same announcements, same message, same speakers, same venue

    Of course.

    There are a bunch of companies out there that offer conference-as-a-service. From travel to accomodation, venue, decoration to social events - of course taking special dietary, cultural and religious needs into account - you can outsource your conference. Of course they're trying to be unique, but they still base everything on their expirience and "best practice"

    --
    bickerdyke
  10. Re:Somehow attract serious attendees GNAA NIGGER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats it, im going to dox this troll. And then im going to get the owners of this jungle to ban every IP address. in fact, we will ban anonymous here and have users register known IPs. we are going to stamp this out.

  11. PC Expo, 1976, Atlantic City, Shelburne Hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one and only.

  12. Marketing by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    That is because these conferences are run by marketing and sales. The marketing people are using it as a platform to show how useful they are to a company, and the sales people are using it to generate leads. What you want is a technical conference, but tech corporations are rolling in money so aren't very interested in technical things at this point.

  13. Nice work for has-been pop musicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of older bands have set up shop in Las Vegas, providing the entertainment at conferences and the like. One time I suspected they brought in a bunch of local kids to dance in front of the stage while pretending to be show attendees.

  14. Like PostgresConf US 2018? April 16-20, 2018 by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

    https://postgresconf.org/

  15. But it won't happen by Dracos · · Score: 1

    These companies really don't care what users think. They want users to mindlessly consume. They want to imprison users in convincingly safe and comfortable walled gardens. User conferences are all marketing, hype, and corporate image management.

    1. Re:But it won't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is why conferences are typically just venues for shills and sales to communicate with managers where all 3 groups are normally clueless about the technology involved.

  16. Not interactive enough by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    What the software world needs are heckling sessions, where users get to pour out their frustrations over the people responsible for them. That includes the developers who leave software littered with bugs and illogical behavior, UI designers who rearrange the whole interface for no good reason and marketers who force user-hostile behavior into programs.

    1. Re:Not interactive enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about that. Seems like that could devolve into shouting matches or physical fights (or even shootings) pretty quick. Too much interactivity might incite riots. I think there's a time and place for things.

    2. Re:Not interactive enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason they don't focus on the software is because a lot of programs are rather shitty. I don't just want to see a demo under ideal conditions, I want to see how it works in a real world scenario. There also needs to be more training at these things.

    3. Re:Not interactive enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At ELCE 2017 there was a 'Bash the kernel maintainers' BoFS. It was quite entertaining, educational, and quite honest since it was not filmed and individual comments/questions/concerns were not personally identified in the notes.

    4. Re: Not interactive enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse, if they implement rape-ware and sabotage the competition to get it embedded. Too many of these companies are buying their way into technology sectors and slamming the door shut on the old ways.

      Yes I sound old but I seem to spend more time running around migrating deliberately busted deprecated systems than *using* the computer. The computer has become the whole problem.

    5. Re:Not interactive enough by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      I dunno about that. Seems like that could devolve into shouting matches or physical fights (or even shootings) pretty quick. Too much interactivity might incite riots. I think there's a time and place for things.

      Not that I'm advocating for riots or shootings, but events where companies basically enable users to incite shouting matches and (figuratively) drag incompetent devs and management through the mud is exactly what the industry needs.

      Nobody cares about backwards compatibility, competent UIs, optimizing for resource frugality, useful status indicators, or a dozen other software paradigms that have fallen to the wayside in the past decade. Amongst the reasons for this is the fact that there is basically no accountability to customers anymore, and no concern of user revolt. If there was, Quickbooks would be half its size, twice its speed, and thrice its stability. Windows 10 simply wouldn't exist in its present form. Oracle...

      While I'm not outright advocating for violence and I realize that such a paradigm is likely to end up with a mob mentality on both sides, I think instilling a little fear into some managers and project developers would do wonders to improve the software industry.

  17. Useless by sexconker · · Score: 2

    All of these conferences are useless. Here's what I want to know:

    What does your product do?
    How much does it cost?

    If you can't answer that on a single page on your website, you're full of shit.

    1. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up. Mod it all the way up.

    2. Re:Useless by PPH · · Score: 1

      What does your product do?
      How much does it cost?

      You evidently aren't a user yet. Or you would already know the answers to these questions.

      Users would ask things like:

      Why doesn't Feature X work properly?
      When are you going to port your product to something other than XP/IE6?
      What about all these bugs?

      But in my industry, once you become a user, you have signed all sorts of ND agreements and licenses which prohibit you from speaking to anyone other then the vendor about the above topics. Getting users together in a room would be an app vendor's worst nightmare.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  18. Status quo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every so often we get these stories that take the normalcy, the status quo, and portray them as innovative. On the one hand, thatâ(TM)s ok - things normal to me may be new to you, and vice-versa. Itâ(TM)s also good to see others doing good things you are already doing. On the other, itâ(TM)s not much fun to read...

  19. Developers have moved to Facebook and YouTube! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advent of digital platforms for communication has nullified a lot of reasons to have official conferences. Digital platforms are far less expensive to use and you can still get most of the same impact without the cost.

  20. Attendees are most of the problem. by shess · · Score: 1

    The last time I went to WWDC, I managed to scrounge together a set of technical presentations to go to. I distinctly remember sitting through a Grand Central Dispatch presentation where the presenter really was dumbing things down for the audience. Which was probably fair, because even the "real developers" audience these days contains a huge proportion of people who are only functional when you equip them with a few hundred third-party libraries to do important work like "trim whitespace from the ends of a string". When tech enthusiasts fight hard to get tickets to your developer conference, it waters down the technical chops of your audience, and it also attracts sales and marketing and product-management types, and that's just not what a good developer conference needs.

    Same basic thing happened to Google Developer Day and Google I/O. And a bunch of the "conferences" other companies put on weren't even anything more than sales and marketing product-release events to begin with.

    1. Re:Attendees are most of the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard-core tech conferences only attract "weirdos" which don't provide easy marketing opportunities. You can't stick a picture of those sorts of people on your facebook page - all the normals will lose their lunches and 'unfriend' immediately.

      Instead, you need to appeal to the masses - lots of diversity and lots of different 'departments' all coming along to see what it's all about. That way you can take nice photos of all that diversity and put them on your facebook page. Not only will no one unfriend you, but you'll get zillions of likes, and probably some more followers to boot.

      The fact that the actual conference is absolute dross is immaterial. It's what you can get from it that counts ;-)

  21. Re:Time to bring back The Chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to bring out a new mod -2, for just this sort of off-topic crap.

  22. SHARE by shadowknot · · Score: 1

    I've attended the SHARE conference for the last few years, it's been going on for more than 50. For those not in the know it's a user conference that's focused primarily on IBM System z and its associated ecosystem. Point by point on the checklist in TFA I can say it passes for the most part, there was a bit of a hiccup with one of the keynote speakers last year in San Jose but for the vast majority of the speakers I've heard they've been relevant and useful. If other parts of the computing ecosystem want to see how a user conference should be run I highly recommend they attend SHARE. Great mix of in-depth product demo sessions, hands-on labs and technical sessions that are often delivered by product experts and/or people who have or are involved in development. I can speak mainly for the z/VM and z/OS security content but there's no other conference I'd rather attend each year.

  23. A superb conference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I miss SUCing very much. I wish I'd have an opportunity to be a SUCer again. I just want to SUC so bad.

  24. Made it to 'meuller' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then i quit reading.

    I don't care.

  25. But you need a solution by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Websites are developed by marketing. So of course they contain no information.

    But you need to buy something to solve a problem.

    At the conference, with a bit of luck, you can actually find a product manager and possibly even an engineer. Priceless.