Slashdot Mirror


'Iron Man' Director Jon Favreau Will Write And Produce a Live-Action 'Star Wars' TV Series For Disney's New Streaming Service (cnet.com)

From a report: Jon Favreau is going from "Avengers" blockbusters to a galaxy far, far away. The director, actor, producer and writer will take on a Star Wars starring role by helming a series destined for Disney's new streaming video service. While Favreau is multi-talented, his focus will be on producing and writing the unnamed show. Favreau is a bonafide Star Wars fan who voiced a character in the animated "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" and also has appearance in the upcoming "Solo: A Star Wars Story."In a statement, Favreau said, "If you told me at 11 years old that I would be getting to tell stories in the Star Wars universe, I wouldn't have believed you. I can't wait to embark upon this exciting adventure."

90 comments

  1. Boycott Star Wars by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jon Favreau is a well-known SJW and will probably ruin the entire franchise by making the Empire the bad guys this time.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The franchise seems to be intent on ruin without Mr. Favreau.

    2. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a little known fact that Favreau's given name is Binks.

    3. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you on about? The Empire is a large overreaching government. Of course it's the bad guy. Being against The Empire seems to be a fair bit more in line with Libertarian beliefs, and I know how you just love them.

    4. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "white men can't possibly contribute to anything" - That's NOT true, you yourself manage to elicit whining sounds of pseudo-victimstance constantly. That's not nothing. You should feel pride! Be the best victim!

    5. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it cultural appropriation for anyone BUT a cis white dude to make Star Wars movies?

    6. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boycott Disney. They're money grubbing asshats.

    7. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Lucas is married to a black woman, is he a reverse-cuck in the Republican parlance?

    8. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When white men learn from other cultures, it's called "appropriation." When they design something new and useful that other cultures adopt, it's "colonialism."

    9. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's an authoritarian puppet-anti-government usurped from a noble Republic through deception by a rich old white man who happens to be the embodiment of seething evil... hmmmmmm, nah too far fetched... it's pure fantasy.

    10. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the preferred term is "oil driller."

    11. Re:Boycott Star Wars by butchersong · · Score: 1

      I don't care anymore. At all. I'm sure Disney will manage to squeeze money from the franchise for years to come simply because the notion of Star Wars is so firmly embedded in our collective consciousness but there is no wonder or even much in the way of nostalgia left for me.

    12. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      It took Luke three movies to get to be a full Jedi, some chick from the desert did it in one movie. That's how you kill a franchise.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    13. Re:Boycott Star Wars by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      When Chinese companies learn from American ones it's called called stealing. Maybe it's all just bullshit.

      Also, you don't know what cultural appropriation is. I mean, I don't really buy into it much either, but at least I bothered to learn what it is.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      This is still another category: "stealing" is when Asians make a technology profitable that the West developed but declines to use, even when no patent is involved.

    15. Re: Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you missed it, the Force had Awoken in the interim.

    16. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's not a trans black woman and instead just another (long sign) straight white man.

      Being a long time LEGO builder, I (briefly) thought "transparent". Like the old trans yellow parts from Classic Space.

    17. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually hate your comments because of your smug overinflated ego, but that was fucking hilarious.
      I like you more now.

    18. Re:Boycott Star Wars by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I usually hate your comments because of your smug overinflated ego, but that was fucking hilarious.
      I like you more now.

      Thanks, mom.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like when non-chinese companies use a Chinese factory to make the electronics, coupled with their OEM software. Then continue to make more than asked for so they can rebadge and sell under their own brand. Thats learning!!!!

    20. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars: the Force Got Woke

    21. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing what bitches white males have become trying to out-victimize their historical victims

      Maybe we shouldn't foster a victimhood culture, then many people wouldn't be running to be the biggest victim of the all. You should take your own advice on the rest of your post, whining about how other people whine...

    22. Re:Boycott Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry more faggot.

    23. Re:Boycott Star Wars by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      I believe the preferred term is "oil driller."

      Preferred by inbred pencildicked rednecks.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    24. Re:Boycott Star Wars by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      It's amazing what bitches white males have become trying to out-victimize their historical victims

      Maybe we shouldn't foster a victimhood culture ....

      Good luck with that. The commercials on the local Fox channel are 80% ambulance-chasing lawyers offering to "get you the money you deserve". It's like Jerry Springer 24x7.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    25. Re: Boycott Star Wars by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      Well, no, colonialism has a very specific meaning relating to the extraction of material wealth from a country combined with subjugation of native born citizens. But, your "everyone is mean to muh white people" definition is cute, I guess. Thanks for showing everyone where the real racist hypocrisy is.

  2. Cringe Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were 3 Star Wars movies, they were released between 1977 and 1983. Get off my lawn with all this "Star Wars" (in name only but now we're about the superficial, virtue signalling empowerment narratives instead of creating decent characters) crap.

    1. Re:Cringe Wars by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      "SWINO"... I like it! That's really what it is. Star Wars in name only. I really enjoyed Iron Man and that's about the last thing Favreau has been involved in beyond playing "Happy Hogan" that I've cared about. This is just more "The Force is Female" bullshit. Can't wait to see their next Mary Sue. Pity they didn't leave him one of the big three original trilogy characters to shit all over but I guess he'll have to settle for Chewie, C-3PO, and R2-D2.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  3. Pass by sexconker · · Score: 1

    All of the EU Star Wars shit is crap. I don't care what Disney has canonized, or which shitty cartoon came in after the last canonical axe fell.

    Star Wars canon is:
    Star Wars
    Star Wars: Holiday Special
    Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back
    Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi
    The various Star Wars PSAs from the era of the original trilogy (drunk driving, immunization, etc.)

    I'd even accept the prequel trilogies before I accept the shitty CGI cartoons and the Disney shit.

    1. Re:Pass by jzarling · · Score: 1

      I accept that Qui-gon died for the prophecy of the chosen one.

      --
      It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
    2. Re:Pass by halivar · · Score: 1

      What you've described is called "head canon." It's the opposite of canon.

    3. Re:Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure wish I had head cannon.

    4. Re:Pass by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the prophecy...What did Qui-gon think would happen? At the time there were no known Sith and Jedi were everywhere. If Anakin would bring balance to the force that means bye bye Jedis.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    5. Re:Pass by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I thought that conclusion was pretty obvious to see, even if I hadn't known who Anakin was destined to become.

    6. Re:Pass by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      add to that list the two Ewok movies and the Brian Daley Han Solo trilogy and you're golden

    7. Re:Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, Anikin balanced the force twice, actually. First by killing most of the Jedis so the sith could come back into power, and then by killing the emperor because the sith had become too powerful.

      My take has always been that the force is ultimately a puppet master that keeps humanity trapped in a cycle of violence. Jedi get strong in the force by letting it "guide" them, and of course it guides them straight into violent conflict with the sith. The sith grow strong in the force by giving into their rage, and of course giving in to rage naturally drives one to violent conflict.

      Humanity would be better off if nobody let the force influence them at all. Then maybe, just maybe, they could talk their differences out like civilized people.

    8. Re:Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got it, but backwards. It's the Sith who create the Jedi. If there was no evil, the Jedi have no purpose and would not exist. The Sith bide their time, letting their enemy grow fat, fractured and weak in empire. Therein the big voltage.

    9. Re:Pass by sheramil · · Score: 1

      What about I.M.P.S.? http://impstherelentless.com/

    10. Re:Pass by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Sometimes being a stubborn jackass isn't a good thing. Qui-gon.

      I remember saying right after Anakin killed off all the Jedi trainees, "well he did bring balance to the force." The people that I was with didn't think it was that funny then. I thought it was hilarious .

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    11. Re:Pass by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The Sith were just trying to fight against the globalist cucks and Make Coruscant Great Again.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  4. He's kind of an asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you came here to shit on everyone's childhood memories?

    Do you also steal candy from babies?

    Star Wars is entertainment, it's not high art. It's a way for people to escape mundane life for a bit and watch some fictional characters have an adventure in a totally different sort of universe. Fans (fanatics) have built up a way to socialize their mutual interest in the series by going to conventions or dressing up as characters from the film. To me it seems harmless, and something to look forward to after working a 9-5 job.

    Why do you want to suck the fun out of everything? Can't you find your own happiness?

    1. Re:He's kind of an asshole by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It seems to me Lucas and Disney and an entire army of shitty fan fic / EU "writers" shat on everyone's memories (childhood or otherwise) with the release of everything after Return of the Jedi.

      Did you like Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull? Did you jerk yourself off when watching Chris Pratt be smart enough to train raptors, but not smart enough to use a human sized door to enter a giant dinosaur enclosure in Jurassic World?

      Hollywood is shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.

    2. Re:He's kind of an asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo frickety hoo, your favourite media franchise has been taken in a direction you don't like. Go cry on your mother's tits, I'm sure she'll listen to your worthless opinions.

    3. Re:He's kind of an asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you came here to shit on everyone's childhood memories?

      He only shit on the memories of those who came after. I saw Star Wars when I was seven years old, and it is my favorite movie ever. I don't watch it now because I have it in my memory. And I agree with almost every thing sexconker had to say. I would just tweak the list in one way.

      Star Wars canon is:
      Star Wars
      Star [The Empire Strikes Back] Wars
      Star Wars: Return of the Jedi

      I never saw the holiday special, but don't consider it anything more than a "project". Also, the second and third movies did not have chapters in their titles. The second one had that funny way of wrapping Star Wars around The Empire Strikes Back.

    4. Re:He's kind of an asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, it's your fantasy. You can pick whatever you want as "canon", even if you might not be able to find anyone else who will share that fantasy with you.

  5. No thanks. by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I liked the first three Star Wars movies. Fun, clever writing for the era they were filmed in, explored ideas in a way that made sense for their circumstance without cheap drama, considering their inspiration of old serial films. Ewoks were annoying, but they didn't take up much time.

    The prequels sucked. Basically they upped the cheap drama, placed an extra-whacky Ewok-equivalent front and center, and replaced the ideas with empty aphorisms and ... midiclorians.

    The recent follow up movies suffered many of the same problems - cheap drama followed by ANGRY cheap drama, and that modern-sci-fi variant of stretching all ideas out into teases for franchises. Lots of spinning wheels, nothing to really take with you.

    The whole point of stories is that they are shared dreams. I'm not seeing anything worth while being explored for the past several decades of this franchise with those dreams.

    Well, at least with the films. Tie Fighter the game, and the old RPG KOTOR were really fascinating in their take on ideas they explored - but I'm not seeing any real follow up on that stuff. Just more empty drama with the recent games/multiplayer things.

    If I see someone paste clips on youtube, I'll take a peek, but no a-priori fascination off the bat.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the first three Star Wars movies. Fun, clever writing for the era they were filmed in, explored ideas in a way that made sense for their circumstance without cheap drama, considering their inspiration of old serial films. Ewoks were annoying, but they didn't take up much time.

      The prequels sucked. Basically they upped the cheap drama, placed an extra-whacky Ewok-equivalent front and center, and replaced the ideas with empty aphorisms and ... midiclorians.

      The recent follow up movies suffered many of the same problems - cheap drama followed by ANGRY cheap drama, and that modern-sci-fi variant of stretching all ideas out into teases for franchises. Lots of spinning wheels, nothing to really take with you.

      The whole point of stories is that they are shared dreams. I'm not seeing anything worth while being explored for the past several decades of this franchise with those dreams.

      Well, at least with the films. Tie Fighter the game, and the old RPG KOTOR were really fascinating in their take on ideas they explored - but I'm not seeing any real follow up on that stuff. Just more empty drama with the recent games/multiplayer things.

      If I see someone paste clips on youtube, I'll take a peek, but no a-priori fascination off the bat.

      Ryan Fenton

      Good luck with that. The commercials on the local Fox channel are 80% ambulance-chasing lawyers offering to "get

    2. Re:No thanks. by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      The recent followup movies simply reset everything - episode 7 was a remake of episode 4, and 30 years after defeating the Empire, the good guys are again stuck as the underdog against a 'new order' (of what, takeout?) pulled out of the director's ass. The Last Jedi took the already bad story and distortions in continuity and made it worse with a dose of pandering to the SJW crowd.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  6. I see it now by Ubi_NL · · Score: 1

    Jar jar, the younger years. With baby wookies

    --

    If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
  7. Nope.. not even for Star Wars by rtkluttz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will I be nickel and dimed by every movie studio and TV channel separately. I'm a cord cutter. I will use ONE service and one service only and it will be the one that has the most content and the one that most liberally allows me to use devices, apps and operating systems that don't track my every movement. That or I'll either do without or pirate. It's their choice. DRM has gone beyond a way to police content, it is now forced as a way to force you to use entire content delivery systems that they control.

    --
    Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
    1. Re:Nope.. not even for Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have ONE service, how are you a cord cutter? Isn't a cord cutter one who isn't paying for a service?

    2. Re:Nope.. not even for Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cord cutter is not paying for cable. Cord cutters pay for Netflix all the time.

    3. Re:Nope.. not even for Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a stupid distinction.

    4. Re: Nope.. not even for Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you never understood what cord cutter meant and just made up your own definition.

    5. Re:Nope.. not even for Star Wars by sexconker · · Score: 2

      A "cord cutter" is one who is paying for cable, but only paying the ISP for the data portion of it, then paying Netflix/Hulu/Amazon/Whoever for the traditional content (or simply stealing it). And as we've seen, costs keep going up for those other services, and content keeps getting siloed off or pulled into brand new services that have only one or two things people want to see.

      "Cord cutting" hasn't really changed the industry for the better. Piracy has, though, because services need to compete with that convenience and their's a lower ceiling to the price people are willing to pay when they can go and get shit for free.

  8. Can his friend Joss come too, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please... PLEEEEEEEZE?

  9. Well... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    If Favreau is given some independence, this might not be bad. He's actually made some pretty darned good films over the years in a number of different genres. Elf is one of my favorite Christmas films (not to mention one of the few Will Farrell vehicles I actually enjoy), and Zathura was a pretty worthy semi-sequel to Jumanji. My problems with Iron Man are more to do with the fact that I never particularly liked the character, but it was a well made film.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the end, his best movie is CHef

      and I'm not kidding.. I think it was very entertaining!

    2. Re:Well... by turp182 · · Score: 1

      OK, I like going to Vegas once a decade and wearing a nice shirt. And who wouldn't want to be a rich actor?

      Favreau wrote, directed, produced, and starred in Swingers in 1996. I still enjoy it, people wanting everything but just doing regular stuff because they don't know what to do (or it's not possible).

      Getting nostalgic, around that time (a bit before), Floundering came out, a movie I have watched quite a few times, showed it to my future wife about a week into dating (couple of decades in so far):
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt01...

      Weird perspective on post-Los Angeles riot days and the purpose of life.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  10. All I know is by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    There was some guy in a bathrobe, telling me:

    "This is not the streaming service you are looking for."

    1. Re:All I know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was some guy in a bathrobe, telling me:

      "This is not the streaming service you are looking for."

      And what kind of 'streaming service' are you looking for from men in bathrobes?

      You'll need the yellow hanky for that.

  11. Not that Star Wars universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If you told me at 11 years old that I would be getting to tell stories in the Star Wars universe, I wouldn't have believed you.

    And rightly so, because the Star Wars universe you knew at 11 years old (or 21 or 31) was first injured and then killed and replaced by some abomination with the sole purpose of making money instead of telling stories.

    1. Re:Not that Star Wars universe by tbannist · · Score: 2

      > If you told me at 11 years old that I would be getting to tell stories in the Star Wars universe, I wouldn't have believed you.

      And rightly so, because the Star Wars universe you knew at 11 years old (or 21 or 31) was first injured and then killed and replaced by some abomination with the sole purpose of making money instead of telling stories.

      The saddest thing is that you may actually believe this. Star Wars has always been about making money. The first hint should be that it was a movie released in theatres. You do understand, don't you, that they do that to make money? I was kid during the original Star Wars trilogy. There were tonnes of toys to cash in one the movies and there were people just like you telling everyone (whether or not they wanted to hear it), how the Empire Strikes Back and later Return of the Jedi were doing the same thing to the original Star Wars movie, that it had been "first injured and then killed and replaced by some abomination with the sole purpose of making money instead of telling stories".

      Face it, Star Wars has always been a space opera, they're exciting action movies with a little bit of mysticism thrown in. Now I'll agree the prequels are truly terrible because they are poorly made movies, with too much bad CGI, they were poorly shot, poorly acted and had pretty bad dialogue and pacing. The sequels, however, have been much better.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    2. Re:Not that Star Wars universe by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      The difference is in the 70s, you had to make a good movie to make money. Today you can just churn out turd after turd and people will pay for the nostalgia and special effects.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    3. Re:Not that Star Wars universe by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 2

      I think that view is a bit cynical. Lucas strikes me as someone who actually enjoyed being a story teller and film maker (especially playing with new technologies). He was just smart enough to realize he could make a buck doing that, then used that as a way of getting funding to continue doing what he liked.

      --
      horror vacui
    4. Re:Not that Star Wars universe by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Star Wars has always been a space opera

      Small correction, its space fantasy. You got mystic knights with swords that cut through anything. There are space wizards through around magic space lightning.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    5. Re:Not that Star Wars universe by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Amusingly enough, Star Wars is one of the examples given on the Wikipedia and TV Tropes pages for Space Opera. I do agree that it is science fantasy, again according to the definitions on Wikipedia and TV tropes, but I don't think they are mutually exclusive categorizations but rather space opera defines the type of story, and science fantasy describe the world (or universe) the story is set in.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    6. Re:Not that Star Wars universe by tbannist · · Score: 1

      That's most likely true, the point isn't that Lucas is a terrible person, rather it's that not much has changed. I'm pretty sure the people making the new Disney Star Wars movies love what they are doing too. Heck, I think even Michael Bay loves what he does, but I never want to watch another movie that he's worked on again... And the same type of people are complaining about Star Wars selling out now that were complaining about it 30 years ago. It's just now those people have the internet so they can broadcast their opinions a lot further and more frequently than they could before.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  12. It's a pity it's live action by schweini · · Score: 2

    After having dismissed the Clone Wars and Rebels animated series for looking very childish, I have finally come around to binge-watching them, and I think they are great!

    The Star Wars universe lends itself beautifully to TV series, because there are a gadzillion of little back-stories to tell and flesh out. It really makes the universe come alive even more.

    That being said, the animation style takes some getting used to, but I didn't even notice it after a couple of episodes in. But something that does constantly cross my mind is "I bet they couldn't have done this battle sequence, or space combat sequence if it were live-action, so lucky us that they decided to do it in animation!"
    So, a live-action tv-series will have to cut back on effects and complexity quite a lot. I would prefer them to go animated, again.

    1. Re:It's a pity it's live action by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      CGI is so cheap now they can probably do a lot on the budget Disney will provide for this. Look at Star Trek Discovery as an example. Almost every scene has CGI in it, and pretty good CGI at that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:It's a pity it's live action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ST:D costs around 8 Million per episode. Not exactly cheap.

  13. SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the SJWs want to make their own Star Wars series, let them. They did that with Mass Effect Andromeda. Look how that turned out, Mass Effect is now dead. I don't want Star Wars to die, but it may prove the point. If the SJWs really want to have a sci fi property, then maybe they should make their own and see how well it does.

    I don't get why everyone has to force their two cents into everything. Let people make what they want, if you don't like it, don't watch it.

    1. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the SJWs want to make their own Star Wars series, let them. They did that with Mass Effect Andromeda. Look how that turned out, Mass Effect is now dead. I don't want Star Wars to die, but it may prove the point.

      As has been pointed out, those who demand their version of social Justice in movies don't buy merchandise, and often don't even watch the movies. Star Wars the feminists strike back made a lot of money, but the falloff was rapid, and apparently the merchandise tanked.

      Now that being said, if the SJW's want a movie where they actually kill off white men in front of cheering throngs of pink haired harpies, and call it "Chanty Binx, Queen of the New Female Order" well I suppose that is fine. But the latest movie is a world class FUCK YOU! to the standard Star Wars Fan.

      It's like third wave feminists are hell bent on ruining whatever they touch, and can't actually create anything.

    2. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like Rian Johnson DID make what he wanted. If you don't like it, don't watch it.

    3. Re:SJW by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Mass Effect died when they made a sequel that took the franchise from an RPG to a FPS...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    4. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like Rian Johnson DID make what he wanted. If you don't like it, don't watch it.

      Many people didn't

    5. Re:SJW by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      If the SJWs want to make their own Star Wars series, let them. They did that with Mass Effect Andromeda. Look how that turned out, Mass Effect is now dead.

      I'm actually on my second play-through of ME:A at the moment. I really just don't see anything particularly SJW about it. I see that as almost-surprising, given the shoe-in they had for showing some controversy regarding whether the Andromeda Initiative would count as colonialism. This really could have been done very well if there was a third race in Heleus besides the nearly-angelic Angara and the one-dimensional, conquest-driven Kett. It also was a near-perfect setup for there to have been an AGW angle to it - a planet where a vault was necessary because the Angarans had caused climate change through industrialization again would have been easy pickin's for such a topic.

      I saw none of it. Really, I didn't. Both Scott and Sara have male and female love interests, but homosexual love interests have been a part of Mass Effect ever since Femshep caught a glimpse of Liara's sideboob.

      No, the reason ME:A was a bust was because they did a whole lot of design-by-committee. Lots of open world quests that were simple time sinks which take away from the otherwise-fairly-short main quest, loyalty missions that were generally pointless, political issues on the Nexus that were used as plot devices rather than actually-explored the way they should have been, a story that thoroughly contradicts itself throughout the narrative, a combat system that's ultimately very good but an incredibly jarring difference for players who wrapped up ME3 the week prior, dialogue choices which seldom impact more than the NPC's next line of dialog, and characters that are either direct copy/pastes from ME1 (Drack), poor copy/pastes from ME1 (Vetra), or just outright abysmal (Liam). Ironically, the one thing they did reasonably well was give it a solid ending sequence.

      No, ME:A has lots of issues with it, but though I keep hearing the "SJW BS" line, I'm open to examples because I was hard pressed to find many of them.

    6. Re:SJW by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      If you look at the inflation adjusted grosses here

      http://www.boxofficemojo.com/f...

      You see

      Star Wars
      Star Wars: The Force Awakens
      Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
      Return of the Jedi
      The Empire Strikes Back
      Star Wars: The Last Jedi
      Rogue One: A Star Wars Story
      Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith
      Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones

      So the first film made a tonne of cash, then you see the first films of the reboot and first film of the prequels, then the sequels to the original, then the sequels to the reboot, then the sequels to the prequels.

      What's probably happening here is that if you reboot something people remember from their childhood they'll go along to see if its any good. Once they realise it isn't they'll just wait for the next reboot.

      Solo : A Star Wars story will be fairly fair down in that list I predict, somewhere beneath Rogue One and Attack of the Clones. Same with Episode 9.

      Of course all these films are still profitable which means they'll keep making more of them. However it looks like a clear case of diminishing returns. Mind you a reboot would help - look at how Star Wars: The Force Awakens did much better than the last two prequels.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  14. Swingers! by sootman · · Score: 1

    In a statement, Favreau said, "If you told me at 11 years old that I would be getting to tell stories in the Star Wars universe, I wouldn't have believed you."

    Jon, you're so money and you don't even know it.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  15. After Disney's acquisition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars no longer exists in my reality. Whatever. I guess kids might enjoy it, if their parents are heathens.

  16. All I can say is... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    The Force is so money.

    --
    -Styopa
  17. Star Wars is jumping the shark for fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously the Han Solo/Lando Calrissian movie is just a comedic spoof of the original two Star Wars EU novel trilogies from the late 70s early 80s: The Lando Calrissian and the Han Solo trilogies revolving around the Corporate Sector Authority, the sabaac game leading to solo's ownership of the falcon, and yes even the robot duo that has not been rebranded as this retarded robot called 1337. Originally known as Blue Max (krang's metallic originating character) and Bollax (I may be getting this wrong, I don't have the novel handle to reference his name.) who was like the robotic version of the guy/suit robot that krang crashed around inside of for most of the original TMNT animated series from the 80s-90s.

    It is pretty sad when creative works are being pilfered by people who demand licensing of their own, but shaft licensing their own derivative works with far more compelling storylines to make a cheap knockoff of a lovingly written knockoff of their own fictional univese. But hey, that has been the Lucasfilm derived Star Wars since The Phantom Menace came out, despite the LucasGames media franchise (until its closure) integrating with the broader licensed extended universe works to creative a galaxy far wider than the movies and tv shows that they had stopped producing by the 80s, leaving the market fallow for a decade and a half to build up aroudn other better quality creatives who made the universe what it was until mainstream culture and corporate ownership did the same thing to it that happened to Star Trek where a schism happened due to the motion pictures and tng diverging from the cultures laid out in TOS and Trek's extended universe until that point.

  18. To Quote Darth Vader: by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Noooooooooooooooooooooo!

    Three words: The Shannara Chronicles.

    So if you're looking for someone to ruin your childhood memories look no further...

  19. Disney can shove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing works with Disney trying to make big profits from Star Wars. I just wish they'd do a better job of it. Make sense. Don't be stupid.

    With the current state of Star Wars, combined with no desire to have multiple subscriptions, I won't be watching them.

  20. Separate streaming service by CimmerianX · · Score: 1

    To get this you'd need to sign up for disney's streaming service... Not going to happen. I don't subscribe to a service for one show. Was it CBS and that Star Trek show they offered on Streaming only? That didn't last. This won't either.

    Dear disney. Do you want to get your shows pirated? Because pulling your content from netflix and starting your own service is how you get your pirated.

       

  21. No cash for the mouse by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    If Disney think I'm going to subscribe to yet another streaming service just for Star Wars, I've got some bad news for them. I'll binge them during my trial periods, each and every season.

    --
    ...
  22. Suck, it will by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Disney has ruined Starwars.

  23. The Disney Touch by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Who's the leader of the cult that rules eternity?
    A-n-a
    k-i-n
    V-a-d-e-r

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.