Tesla Raises Prices At Its Supercharger Stations
Tesla is increasing the cost of the paid Supercharger access, but a spokesperson for the company says that it "will never be a profit center." Electrek reports: When introducing the program, Tesla said that it aimed to still make the cost of Supercharging cheaper than gasoline and that it doesn't aim to make its Supercharger network a profit center. Instead, they want to use the money to keep growing the network which now consists of over 1,180 stations and close to 9,000 Superchargers. But this week, the rates were updated across the U.S. Some states saw massive increases of as much as 100 percent -- though most regions saw their rates increase by 20 to 40 percent. For example, Oregon saw an increase of $0.12 to $0.24 per kWh, while California, Tesla's biggest market in the U.S., got an increase from $0.20 to $0.26 kWh and New York's rate went from $0.19 to $0.24 per kWh. A spokesperson for Tesla said in a statement: "We occasionally adjust rates to reflect current local electricity and usage. The overriding principle is that Supercharging will always remain significantly cheaper than gasoline, as we only aim to recover a portion of our costs while setting up a fair system for everyone. This will never be a profit center for Tesla."
Oregon saw an increase of $0.12 to $0.24 per kWh, while California, Tesla's biggest market in the U.S., got an increase from $0.20 to $0.26 kWh and New York's rate went from $0.19 to $0.24 per kWh.
Can someone smarter than I compute/explain how much this translates to MPG in a ICE vehicle that gets 25 mpg at current gas prices (current average is $3.00 a gallon in the U.S.A.)
Thanks in advance. Signed, AC.
esla said that it aimed to still make the cost of Supercharging cheaper than gasoline and that it doesn't aim to make its Supercharger network a profit center. Instead, they want to use the money to keep growing the network which now consists of over 1,180 stations and close to 9,000 Superchargers.
So they're just reinvesting their profits back into the business then. I don't have a problem with that, and I think it's the appropriate thing to do in their case, but don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.
I suspect it is more the cost of needing to build a lot more supercharger stations, and using higher prices to raise revenue to cover those costs. My supercharger has a *median* wait of probably three or four cars beyond full, peaking into the mid-teens. They literally need twice as many superchargers right now, and it is getting worse over time. The only way the whole system won't completely come crashing down is if the cost of charging is high enough to make all the new Model 3 owners think twice until they're able to build that extra infrastructure.
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
Keep in mind that the supercharge network is intended to help people traverse long distances. For the 99% of the time that you drive your vehicle as a city car, your home charging is still the same cost it was before. Tesla has made no secret of its desire to get people off superchargers for their daily charging needs, so this announcement should carry nearly zero impact for people who are using the network as intended.
Tesla has never had a profit - except for that ONE quarter and that was from some accounting tricks.
Tesla is a money loser and has been for over 14 years. And if it can't make money now while is pretty much has the EV market, they're gonna get their asses kicked. They are burning through about a HALF A BILLION dollars every quarter in operations: marketing, salaries, and other expenses. That money is gone- forever. So, when stupid people say, "Tesla isn't losing money, they're investing in factories.", they are showing their complete lack of understanding of Tesla's business and its problems. And they either never read a Tesla financial statement or they are just ignorant.
If it weren't for the periodic and frequent cash infusions that Musk gets from investors - like this last round of JUNK bonds - Tesla would be out of business in a few months. In other words, Tesla is not a viable business.
I predict in a year or two, we'll be discussing the bankruptcy of Tesla.
And how some folks picked up the assets for pennies on the dollar, hired folks who know what they are doing, and will be actually making money - like what happened to Iridium.
Whoa, what supercharger is that? That's certainly not normal.
"Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
As someone who owns 3 ICE and oneeElectric car (Leaf), I have run the numbers and the Leaf wins by a long shot. I spend roughly $38 per month to go the same distance the SUV used to cost $245. Maintenance is almost zero, and the original battery is doing great at 30000+ miles.
When I go on long trips, I still use the other cars, but within 50 miles, the Leaf is fine. I have only charged away from home twice, once because I forgot to plug it in.
Never has a term been so apt.
Are non-Tesla entities allowed to make supercharger stations? It's a non-issue at this point, but eventually the electric vehicle market will grow large enough to make independently owned charging stations viable.
Not only do you want competition to make sure Tesla never decides to start gouging at the stations, but when more electric vehicles come on the market it would be much better if they all shared a common charging interface. No one wants to wander around town looking for a compatible charge-station.
I stole this Sig
Mountain View. I've had to wait for a spot after midnight.
All the Bay Area superchargers are apparently pretty bad, from what I'm told, unless you count the far-flung stations like Gilroy. The rule is, if it shows either full or one spot empty, that means there's a line. If it shows two spots empty, there's probably a line. Basically, the Sunnyvale and Cupertino superchargers can't come online too soon....
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
Okay, San Francisco, I can actually believe that! Tesla's going big on their SF buildout right now for a reason; 4 just isn't enough for a place with so many Teslas. ;) But you've got 5 in construction, and another 5 in permitting, so the situation should be better soon.
"Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
Yeah. Soon they'll only be full most of the time. :-D
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
OK, granted I have driven less than 3000 miles a year for a decade. Yes, I get the low mileage discount on my car insurance ;) My 1999 Ford Expedition only gets 12 mpg, but my office is 2 miles away, tbh I work in my home office most days.
;)
;)
I love my expedition, even with 12"+ of new snow I can open my garage door and just go where I want to.
I do blow out the driveway if the wife needs to go to work
I know I am an old Neanderthal heck I don't want modern electronics (usb, nav, etc, etc) in my vehicle. It is going to be the first things to die/go obsolete. Also, just looked my Expedition and a Tesla are within 500 lbs of each other. I bet I will still be going when the Tesla is stuck and doa (until it gets towed and a recharge)
OK, I have rambled a bit. But here is my point, what is the lowest cost Tesla and will it still be in use 18 years from it's purchase date?
I could use an electric vehicle! I am the perfect individual! I can go a week working from home! I drive very little! Why would I buy a 50k - 60k vehicle with a short life span ( 3-5 years). When I can just go out and buy another used Expedition for 3-5k?
Just my 2 cents
There are millions of Jeep Wranglers on the road today and none of them get more than 25MPG. Typically, it's probably less.
Also, I have a 370Z that averages right at 25-26MPG.
My Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 I used to drive got around 27, but required premium gas too.
So yeah -- 25MPG average seems legit to me. Lots of cars get more, but plenty get less.
OK, I have rambled a bit. But here is my point, what is the lowest cost Tesla and will it still be in use 18 years from it's purchase date
The lowest cost brand new Tesla is $35K (Model 3). If you want a used one then wait a few years. Also learn how to use Google.
Why would I buy a 50k - 60k vehicle with a short life span ( 3-5 years).
What makes you think that an EV only lasts 3-5 years? Why do anti-EV nutjobs always have to lie so blatantly? You think your little monologue makes you sound like an anti-fad classic old soul, but instead it just makes you sound like an uniformed moron.
That's also why Tesla started charging - the more they charge, the more people charge at home, leaving the superchargers available for long-distance travelers. Though since almost all Tesla owners right now get free supercharging, they've got no (financial) reason not to use the superchargers instead of plugging in at night.
Enable 3D printed prosthetics!
Are non-Tesla entities allowed to make supercharger stations? {...} but when more electric vehicles come on the market it would be much better if they all shared a common charging interface. No one wants to wander around town looking for a compatible charge-station.
In Europe, there's a standard to which most manufacturer are gravitating toward : Mennekes (official name Type 2 (VDE-AR-E 2623-2-2)).
It's mostly designed to carry tri-phase AC current.
Most of the cars sold in Europe tend to use Mennekes or have adapters for it. European Tesla, as far I've seen, come with Mennekes sockets instead of the weird proprietary shit that they use in the US.
Different Type 2 connectors will simply advertise different max current to the car. Your home charger will advertise current up to 15A (perhaps 25A) on 1 or 3 phases. High speed charger will advertise much higher currents.
The main difference setting appart Teslas is how they handle DC.
The current standard is based around "Combined Charging System" (CCS) : two extra pins below the connector to carry the high voltage high current DC power.
Tesla instead re-use the AC pins with some proprietary signaling to advertise DC instead of AC.
At least where I live, you can find AC Mennekes charger in lots of public places, and nearly every parking at least features normal house-plugs giving low current AC.
On some big highways you can even find charging stations that features Mennekes, CCS and ChaDeMo.
Usually the house-plug style chargers are free (they are actual house plugs with only fancy box around them advertising them as vehicle chargers).
AC Mennekes charge tend to be paying, but not much more expensive than base electricity costs.
All the tri-standard high speed chargers I've seen are paying, but again, close to electricity costs.
Most of the above are usually made available in partnership with the local utility city company.
You can charge Teslas at them but :
- due to differing standards, you can only charge them with the AC Mennekes. You can't charge them DC (they lack the CCS pins).
- they'll charge slower than on Tesla Super charger (or than if they had the DC pins).
I think I've read that Elon Musk isn't asking royalties for companies to implement the DC Tesla protocols.
So maybe eventually the tri-standard high-speed chargers can be modified to allow DC Tesla charging on their Mennekes plug.
(I've read about un-approved Tesla mode enabled on some multi-standard charger)
I'm sure there as some ChaDeMo or CSS to Tesla adapters on the market, too.
In short :
- Yes, in Europe, there are other brand of fast chargers than Tesla.
- Due to differing implementation for DC, Tesla can't user their higher super charging speed there, but they still can "normal charge" with AC.
- The charging interface is already common, except for the above exception (and except for some older cars that use older standards like Type 1).
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
Someone with hard facts please fill in. Won't supercharging ANY battery result in a reduction in durability and/or premature failure of the pack vs. sedate trickle charging? Or have they magically managed to longevity a constant irrespective of how the charging is carried out?
Speak of the devil.... Sunnyvale opened, right near Mountain View. That should hopefully help take the load off, at least for long enough for more to be finished :)
"Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"