Slashdot Mirror


GNOME 3.28 'Chongqing' Linux Is Here (betanews.com)

BrianFagioli writes: GNOME 3.28 is the latest version of GNOME 3, and is the result of 6 months' hard work by the GNOME community. It contains several major new features, as well as many smaller improvements and bug fixes. In total, the release incorporates 24105 changes, made by approximately 778 contributors.

The Project explains, "GNOME 3.28 comes with more beautiful things! First, and most significantly, GNOME's default interface font (called Cantarell) has undergone a significant update. Character forms and spacing have been evolved, so that text is more readable and attractive. Several new weights have also been added -- light and extra bold -- which are being used to produce interfaces that are both modern and beautiful. Other beautiful things include GNOME's collection of background wallpapers, which has been updated to include a lovely set of photographs, and the selection of profile pictures, which has been completely updated with attractive new images to pick from."

Unfortunately, you can't just click on a button and upgrade to GNOME 3.28 today. Actually, for the most part, you will need to wait for it to become available for your operating system. Sadly, this can take a while. Fedora users, for instance, will have to wait for a major OS upgrade for it to become available.

23 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Chongqing by Beyond+Opinion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In case anyone is wondering about the name, Chongqing is China's fourth municipality, and was apparently the location of the GNOME.asia conference last year. This will save you from having to Google it.

    1. Re:Chongqing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I particularly enjoy the sweet and sour cocker spaniel.

    2. Re:Chongqing by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 2

      Chunking has nothing over old-school French cuisine. Like Rat-Cat-Touille.

  2. Fedora users by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have these things called compilers. They can build the bloody SRPMs and then use those to build installable RPMs any time they bloody well like. That is the difference between Real Linux Users (who CHOOSE whether to wait or not, and who understand that their decision is a CHOICE) and those who believe that open source means you have to wait for a vendor.

    I emphasize this again. There is nothing wrong with waiting. As long as it is a CHOICE. If you feel that it is sensible to wait, or that you don't want to take the time, that is perfectly fine. That is choosing. It is one of the three Great Powers that open source gives.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Fedora users by geek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everyone, please get off this guys lawn.

    2. Re:Fedora users by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gentoo users scoff at lazy Fedora users. And they'd tell you themselves if their kernel ever finishes compiling.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    3. Re:Fedora users by iCEBaLM · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gentoo user here, eternally grateful to AMD for selling relatively cheap 8c/16t CPUs. :)

  3. Re:Chongqing? by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    They have precisely e such developers in any given team. (Well, it's an irrational question, so of course you should expect an irrational answer!)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  4. Work station features? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article seem to be mostly on how much nicer it looks. But it is 2018 the roll of the PC is very different then it was in 1998 or even in 2008.
    Back 10 years ago. The PC was the persons primary computing device for all things work and fun. We needed an attractive desktop environment as it would be one of our main views into the system. However even in 2008 most of our computing is via Web Sites. Back in 1998 when we used mostly application and installed mountains of applications on our PC's The UI and how well to use the Operating System was extremely important.

    Mobile Technology has taken the place of much of our personal computing. The average person can go days or weeks without having to use a traditional PC. The PC has moved from its job as a Personal Computer to a Workstation where we use it for actual work (and High end games). For this type of work, we need the OS to take a step back from saying Hey look at me how cool of an OS I am, to a place to showcase the application(s) needed to be ran. Features need to be focused on bringing the application running to the attention of the user when they need it, and keep many applications well organized so we don't get bogged down by clutter.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Work station features? by greenwow · · Score: 2

      And this is why we switched from KDE and Gnome to Xfce. It doesn't get in the way of productivity and is small and fast.

    2. Re:Work station features? by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gnome 3: designed by coders, coded by designers.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Work station features? by Trogre · · Score: 2

      I was about to post a rebuttal about mobile technology taking the place of personal computing, but then realized you are right.

      The PC is now more focussed on getting stuff done and less about looking nice and consuming menial content.

      That is why I use XFCE.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Work station features? by doom · · Score: 2

      Mobile Technology has taken the place of much of our personal computing. The average person can go days or weeks without having to use a traditional PC.

      And yet, mobile devices are not actually suitable for serious creative work (no one writes a smartphone app on a smartphone), so they're essentially toys that encourage passive consumption.

      But the big linux distros are veering from their largely unsuccessful attempts at competing with Apple and Microsoft on the desktop to competing with Google for the mobile phone, and along the way are continually dumbing down their desktop software, making it harder to use for what it's actually (somewhat) good for.

      First it was the keyboard shortcuts getting dropped and/or broken (I was particularly impressed by gnome's keyboard shortcuts on the window menu, but without the Alt-Spacebar move to get into the window menu.... there are reasons I stayed with icewm). Now they're starting to damage the mouse controls, e.g. with a scrollbar that's skinnier, and hides away, and doesn't have the arrows at top and bottom to move in small intervals.

      (And by the way... is there a *reason* that the "Page Down" key doesn't reliably move down one page any more?)

  5. Re:systemd dependancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Indeed. Gnome was one of the first pieces of software to bake in an artificial dependency on systemd, at the direct request of Poettering himself.

    That single dependency is what railroaded systemd into all of the major distros.

  6. Re:Chongqing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have precisely e such developers in any given team. (Well, it's an irrational question, so of course you should expect an irrational answer!)

    Geez, talk about using the wrong irrational number on fucking Pi Day.

  7. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I roll a PC today I get mostly much the same odd results as when I rolled a PC in 1998 - it nearly always lands with one of the larger sides facing up, and very rarely on end. Its still poor at fulfilling its role as a dice.

  8. I'm sticking with MATE by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gnome 3 changed in a way that removed things that I had become used to, eg the ability to create a set of desktops 3 by 4 and then do some tasks in specific desktops. Yes: you can have multiple desktops but only move up & down -- hard to use; no option to do it the way that I want.

  9. Wow. by scumdamn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fonts and desktop backgrounds. I'm glad those items are top of the line there. Too bad Gnome is still unusable and weird.

  10. Which things did they remove in this version? by iampiti · · Score: 3, Insightful

    n/t

  11. First, and most significantly? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, and most significantly, GNOME's default interface font (called Cantarell) has undergone a significant update.

    You updated the font? Can't wait to hear about the subsequent and less significant changes.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:First, and most significantly? by afranke · · Score: 2

      You can read all about them in the release notes. Probably a better choice than an article that picked their favourite ones from there.

  12. Re:systemd dependancy by walterbyrd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just use Devuan with XFCE. Better in every way.

  13. Examples unappealing by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Every example on the link showed only one window open. Sorry, that implies that they think I'm using a smartphone. I can't tell without additional checking, but it looks as if it's unusable for my use case, as I normally have several windows open in different applications. Even if this is possible at the moment in this release, I have a hard time trusting that they will keep the capability around. They've arbitrarily made changes too often in the past...and it's clearly not something they're interested in.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.