Slashdot Mirror


DIY Explosives Experimenter Blows Self Up, Contaminates Building (fdlreporter.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader hey! writes: Benjamin D. Morrison of Beaver Dam Wisconsin was killed on March 5 while synthesizing explosives in his apartment... The accident has left the apartment building so contaminated that it will be demolished in a controlled burn, and residents are not being allowed in to retrieve any of their belongings.
It was just five years ago that Morrison graduated from Pensacola Christian College in Florida with a degree in pre-pharmacy and minors in chemistry and math. Though a local reverend believes 28-year-old Morrison was "not a bomb maker," USA Today's site FDL Reporter notes that "Officials assume he was making bombs that accidentally exploded and killed him... They have not publicly disclosed what chemicals were in apartment 11 where Morrow lived, only describing them as 'extremely volatile and unstable explosives.'"

50 of 366 comments (clear)

  1. Florida man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    strikes again.

  2. Thoughts and Prayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm helping by keeping them in my thoughts and prayers.

    Everyone should help in this matter by doing this.

    This is the most helpful thing that can be done.

    1. Re:Thoughts and Prayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      This is the most helpful thing that can be done.

      No...Donating money, food, clothing, furniture, or other necessities would be the most helpful.

  3. beliefs by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The man just blew himself up with explosives he made yet...

    local reverend believes 28-year-old Morrison was "not a bomb maker,"

    I wonder if the reverend believes anything else that flies in the face of reality

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:beliefs by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I understand what you've teed up here, and I choose not to swing at that particular pitch, I do have to wonder why a 'reverend' is commenting on this. Anyway, my dad was a chemistry major in college among other things, and so had a lot of textbooks lying around when I was a kid. I remember looking through them to see if I could find a recipe for something that would go boom.

      I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that the guy is a terrorist. He may just have been playing around.

    2. Re:beliefs by cavreader · · Score: 2

      The reverend's statement would have been 100% correct had he not left out a single word. "28-year-old Morrison was not a GOOD bomb maker".

    3. Re:beliefs by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I remember some of the stuff that I had in a chemistry set back in the 60's that I got for Christmas when I was 10. It would get me on a watch list today if I ordered that stuff. I did blow some stuff up back then but it was out in the back 40, not in my house. My mom didn't let me cook up stuff in her kitchen.

    4. Re:beliefs by tquasar · · Score: 2

      A friend had a chemistry set with KmN04 and glycerine. He put the potassium in an ant hole then the glycerine. Poof! Ant volcano.

    5. Re:beliefs by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He died dealing with volatile compounds, wether he was intentionally making explosives or not is unknown. The volatile state may have been an intermediate state of production, or may have been the result of an error during his process. It's not proven yet if explosive compounds were his intended end product.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:beliefs by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Except that gunpowder isn't a volatile explosive material.

      Explosive, yes, volatile, no.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    7. Re:beliefs by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You assume there is actually a need to burn the building to the ground and destroy the possessions of everyone who lives there. There is another theory: Massive government overreaction in the name of safety. The CYA school of law: Better to render a few dozen people destitute and homeless than call in a team of real experts for a risk assessment.

    8. Re:beliefs by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I dug up a fire ant colony once when I was a kid. It's amazing, the Queen was almost 30 feet away from the mound. That pile of dirt is just that, where they put the dirt. I had a spray bottle of Chlordane that I had mixed up (instant death and now illegal) that I used to keep them from eating me up as I dug down the tunnels until I found the main nest. Interesting and informative. I discovered that when you pour poison on the mound they just dump the dirt somewhere else. The Queen never has to move. I use a bait now, it's pretty effective. I was the type of kid that was always wondering about things, nearly killed myself on multiple occasions.

    9. Re:beliefs by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You assume there is actually a need to burn the building to the ground and destroy the possessions of everyone who lives there. There is another theory: Massive government overreaction in the name of safety. The CYA school of law: Better to render a few dozen people destitute and homeless than call in a team of real experts for a risk assessment.

      Honestly, since they are opting for a controlled burn, this seems the most likely situation--most of the things I know of that would render it unsafe due to contamination to even retrieve some personal possessions while not having taken the entire building out already would also render it distinctly unsafe to burn the place down. Either it's going to explode some more, or spread these mysterious toxins even more...

      I wonder what would happen if somebody near the building took them to court, insisting on a proper environmental impact statement before the controlled burn is done?

    10. Re:beliefs by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Robots that don't use brush motors, for one thing. Robots that can't build up a static charge due to extensive use of non-conductive plastics and rubber. I'm thinking about the risk of a spark setting off an explosion from a puddle of volatile liquid.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  4. Probably PETN or one of its derivatives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    PETN is decently easy to make, if the drying is done wrong it is radically sensitized, and the precursors are easy to find.

    Given the FBI's records for creating "bombers" and then busting them, I do wonder what the FBI's involvement was beforehand with this guy.

  5. Things I won't work with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reminds me of an old part of an old blog: Things I won't work with.

    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pi...

    I'm guessing something with fluoride chemistry:

    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pi...

    It's a really fun read about a shockingly horrible bit of chemistry done by our military science.

  6. Re:Offended or not? by TheReaperD · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually black powder and gunpowder are very sticky legal subjects in the US. Know your state and federal laws well before even looking into playing with them.

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  7. Re:Offended or not? by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He went to a Christian college. I bet God was telling him to knock it off and he didn't listen so God turned up the volume.

  8. "He was a quiet man. Kept to himself..." by stevegee58 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...until he blew himself up.

  9. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uhh, who here hasn't made explosives before? Are you going to accuse half of Slashdot of being terrorists by making random, ugly guesses to confirm your own biases?

    We made NI3 in chemistry class. The stupid part of this is that he made the explosives in his home. I mean, really, WTF man. I wonder if he was reading the Anarchist's Cookbook? That doc is an utter piece of trash that is a great way to get yourself killed. At least work off the Army field manual on improvised explosives, it was at least written by people who know what they're doing instead of some idiot anarchist who didn't give a crap about safety and just wanted to burn stuff down.

  10. Fishy by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How unstable can the remaining stuff be? I mean it obviously did not detonate when the fist blast went off.

    My guess if the FBI is covering something up.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Fishy by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I don't get the "we have to burn down the entire building". Won't that send dangerous chemicals into the air? Wouldn't it make more sense to tear down the building and send all the materials to a landfill for hazardous chemicals? Something seems fishy here.

    2. Re:Fishy by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      How unstable can the remaining stuff be? I mean it obviously did not detonate when the fist blast went off.,

      Only if you didn't bother to read the article or know anything about chemistry. "The presence of dangerous chemicals on site make it unsafe to try to salvage the building, officials said, citing the risk of another explosion or chemical exposure to workers."

      Depending on what he was trying to make, the intermediates and the by-products could be very toxic. This was compounded by the fact that the chemicals were spread by an explosion. Have you ever seen how law enforcement clean up a meth cook site. It's full Hazmat suits. Would you say the FBI is "covering something up" when they have to condemn a meth site?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Fishy by gtall · · Score: 2

      Lawyers. Let's look at our options: 1. pay people for their belongings, maybe a few mill max. 2. pay people if the authorities missed something and it goes boom, maybe a few 10's of mill. Gee, as a county executive, what would you chose...and do not forget if something else goes boom, your re-election will also go boom?

      Yep, something's fishy here. Stop watching TV, it is bad for you.

    4. Re:Fishy by Alypius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I posit lawsuits as a driving factor. Door #1 has "condemn the building as an EPA SuperFund site and settle up with the insurance companies after they pay out." Door #2 says, "Be stuck with the medical bills after we cleared people to go back in." There's certainly risk assessment going on, it's just not with the tenants' best interests in mind.

    5. Re:Fishy by HiThere · · Score: 2

      My wild guess:
      His apartment, and the area immediately adjacent is contaminated with hazardous chemicals that also happen to be inflammable. If they take out his apartment, the rest of the building is structurally unsound. So they decided the simplest and cheapest approach is to burn it. This is making the presumption that he wasn't using anything that would survive a fire, but perhaps if he was making explosives that's a reasonable assumption. (Well, OK, he'd have some sulfuric acid, etc. but the explosion would already have spread that all over a bunch of organic stuff, so it won't be acid anymore. And the air is already probably full of nitric/nitrous acid, now that the EPA has stopped enforcement.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Fishy by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      They burned an old farmhouse less than ten miles from me here because it was a heavily contaminated meth site.

  11. Controlled Burn of the Apartment Building by McGruber · · Score: 5, Informative

    The apartment building was successfully burned down on Thursday morning: Beaver Dam apartment burn a success; some personal items retrieved by bomb squad

  12. Retrieved belongings update by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the residents weren't able to get any belongings, the FBI bomb squad did retrieve high value items for them.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  13. Boom by JBMcB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My unbelievably excellent chemistry teacher in high school guaranteed at least one explosion per week in class. Kept our attention grinding through stoichiometry, with the side benefit that most of us went through AP chemistry the next year and got some cheap college credits. The last week he filled a huge balloon with a perfect mixture of oxygen and some exotic relative of pentane, detonated with a remote piezo device he concocted himself. The shockwave blew covers off of the fluorescent lights and rattled windows on the opposite side of the fairly good sized school building.

    My AP chemistry teacher was a bit more pedestrian, but as a bonus for attending a study session on Saturday, he demonstrated thermite burning a hole through 1" thick plate steel.

    Of course, nowadays this would be completely vorboten, and such activities would end you up on an FBI watchlist.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Boom by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah. I bought a chemistry set for my kids, but going through the instructions I realize that by removing anything that could be dangerous from the set what they had left was just boring.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  14. Re:Offended or not? by BitterOak · · Score: 2

    Homemade guns and gunpowder are totally legal in the US. Manufacturing explosives in an apartment building is not.

    Well, technically gunpowder is an explosive. That's kind of how it works.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  15. No shit... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Uhh, who here hasn't made explosives before?"

    I was going to say the same thing. As a kid, we would make black powder from its base three ingredients - took awhile to learn the right proportions. Used extension cords to detonate out in the backyard. Today what was once considered a hands-on chemistry lesson would today get you thrown in jail.

    1. Re:No shit... by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      While there's some truth to that, you probably weren't still making black powder as an adult. I understand that some people may still do so for legitimate reasons (e.g., manufacturing their own ammunition), but there's a whole host of behavior that society is far more willing to tolerate in children than they will in adults. It sounds as though some of the stuff this guy was playing with shouldn't have been done in a residential area at all.

      Part of being an adult is learning to take appropriate precautions and implementing safety measures. It sounds as though you had a reasonable grasp of that even as a kid, but this guy should have known better.

  16. I wonder if authorities are being stupid by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to wonder if certain authorities aren't severely over-reacting. In general, amateurs will use fairly readily available components, many available at your local hardware store or Walmart. They aren't sensitive or all that dangerous until they are combined and processed to make an explosive. The dangerous chemicals are of course harder to get, and not at all necessary to make explosives.

    The report doesn't say what was in the apartment, but odds of are the components aren't really the dangerous at all. After being combined and processed, you of course end up with an explosive, which is dangerous. I wouldn't expect that to be made into a powder and sprinkled around, though - the more dangerous explosives would be contained. The explosion that killed him would also be expected to set off any nearby high explosives. That's how high explosives are set off - by a smaller explosion, not by burning. Generally only low explosives such as black powder are set off by burning. Low explosives have to be in a container to explode, so residue isn't really a problem. (A LOT of residue built up somewhere is a fire hazard, though.) Black powder isn't quite as safe as something like table salt, but a little residue isn't really dangerous and even humidity will render it non-flammable.

    In short, a good cleaning with soap and water probably would have rendered it perfectly safe as far as explosive residue. If the explosion did structural damage to the building that's another issue entirely.

    1. Re:I wonder if authorities are being stupid by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      And now we may never know, because the chances of the authorities ever telling the public what these mysterious super-toxins may be is pretty slim.

      When the story mentions 'DIY explosives' and 'blows self up' though, smart money is on hydrogen peroxide and acetone. Good old TAP - high explosive you can make in your kitchen from readily available chemicals. Also tends to explode if you just stir it a little too fast.

  17. Re:Offended or not? by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is entirely possible to produce explosive compounds recreationally, without making them into anything that could be considered a bomb. The best candidate I know of is a highly-unstable compound that used to be often used in basic chemistry classes. Immediately after production, it is a wet paste, and can easily be spread in a very thin layer, preferably no more than a few grams covering a 2cm radius circle. Once it dries, that circle will make a lovely pop if disturbed, making it great fun to put on desk surfaces.

    Of course, people are dumb. This particular compound grows in destruction exponentially as its quantity increases. A few grams is fun. A few dozen grams is dangerous. A few hundred is lethal. A kilogram in one location is probably a good reason to evacuate the building.

    I am part of a group that, among many other things, handles explosives for educational purposes, partly to help chemists who are not "bomb makers" get an intuitive understanding for just how much of an explosive substance is actually safe, and how to treat them with respect. Sure, we do also build bombs, but they're also detonated safely and in a controlled environment, in full compliance with applicable laws.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  18. Re:Offended or not? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Manufacturing explosives in an apartment building is not.

    Because there is a risk of losing arms, and that would violate people's right to keep their arms, right?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  19. Re:Offended or not? by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is entirely possible to produce explosive compounds recreationally, without making them into anything that could be considered a bomb.

    A lot of people make fireworks, not always professionally, and fireworks both require explosives and a reasonable level of competence in chemistry. They are also typically not considered bombs, and the same goes for any chemically-powered model rockets even though the chemicals involved are most definitely explosives.

    Oh, and then there's dust. That explodes too...

    The part that should be questioned is how anybody with a college degree in chemistry did not get taught better than to experiment with explosive chemicals in their own living space. This falls pretty firmly under the heading of things you do in a purpose-built building.

  20. We'll see what info leaks out over time by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This whole situation seems odd and subject to a wide range of interpretation due to the lack of information.

    - He could have been just a guy who chose an extremely stupid hobby.
    - He could've been cooking meth (although it's hard to see why the police wouldn't just say that).
    - He could've been working on some other synthesized and highly volatile drug... has anyone sought out the expert opinion of John McAfee?
    - He could have been an anti-government wacko planning an attack on a government building.
    - He could've been a radicalized convert to Islam.
    - He could've been planning an attack on an abortion clinic.
    - He could've just been another dude with a grudge against someone and a psychological disorder.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:We'll see what info leaks out over time by careysub · · Score: 2

      Right. There is literally no information about what he was actually doing, what caused the explosion, or what chemicals he had. Any speculation is speculation in complete ignorance at this point.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  21. Re:Let me guess by hey! · · Score: 2

    Depends on what kinds of explosives he was playing with. If he was making mercury fulminate, yeah, you could well turn your whole building into a superfund site.

    However if that were case, they wouldn't be able to just burn the building down. So I'm guessing he was messing some kind of unstable organic compound. The kinds of monitoring equipment they put out (there was a press release so people wouldn't be alarmed by the strange bits of equipment lying around) indicates they were looking for vocs.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  22. what's a contaminant, really? by epine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many of those things contaminate an entire apartment building so much the best option is to burn it to the ground without allowing residents to collect their belongings?

    Contamination is sometimes in the eye of the beholder.

    Some of these "contaminants" might have no human (or wildlife) health effects, but could simply be watch-list chemicals for terrorism screening sensors, and the authorities simply don't want to have to navigate false positives for years or decades to come.

    Now grab your popcorn and watch the fire insurance companies declare this self-interested DHS bonfire an act of God.

    1. Re:what's a contaminant, really? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They probably mean that they can't be sure his apartment doesn't have more explosives in it.

      To be sure they would have to clear it out and strip it down. In bomb disposal gear, with the risk of being blown up.

      Not sure what the kind of job costs or even if it can be justified given that the loss is material things vs life.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  23. TAP is the main thing I thought of by raymorris · · Score: 2

    >. 'blows self up' though, smart money is on hydrogen peroxide and acetone. Good old TAP - high explosive you can make in your kitchen from readily available chemicals. Also tends to explode if you just stir it a little too fast.

    I thought of the same. Low explosives such as black powder don't tend to kill the maker in an accident. (Unless it's industrial scale). Losing a finger is entirely possible. Acetone peroxide, as you said, attracts idiots because the components are readily available, AND it's very unsafe to make - killing yourself is entirely possible.

    I heard one guy who lives near me had a lot of experience making pyrotechnics, making black powder and such. He (very carefully) made a few MILLIgrams of acetone peroxide. Seeing what just a few milligrams was like, he swore to never again go near AP.

  24. Re:Offended or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On explosives: The part that gets by most people is that there's quite a difference between "explosives" (burns quickly) and "high explosives" (burns supersonically, ie the stuff military use). Blackpowder is already "explosive", indeed a nice dust-air mix can explode, and oh hey, what to think of a BLEVE?

    The fireballs you see in movies as "explosions" are usually burning gas, not high explosives.

    Source: Highschool chemistry. That was 25 years ago, they might not teach it now. On that note, the electrolysis of water demonstration we got included filling soap bubbles with either hydrogen or oxygen, then burn, but also both: Ideal mix, ignite, supersonic boom. Small one, but still.

    Tangent: The Hindenburg was filled with hydrogen, but not an ideal mix. Had it been the latter half the town would've needed new glass. Instead the ablaze carcass just floated to the ground and most of the people got off alive. That's a better survival rate than most airplane crashes. Most of the dead, in fact, died from jumping, not burning. Go figure.

    The part that should be questioned is how anybody with a college degree in chemistry did not get taught better than to experiment with explosive chemicals in their own living space. This falls pretty firmly under the heading of things you do in a purpose-built building.

    Modern edumacasion is so scared that it errs on the side of teaching too little. Just enough to show you where to get the rest of the rope but not enough to do it safely.

    OTOH, some people are less than entirely bright on such points. We had some people that required regular slapping on the head to stop them doing anything too stupid. So it just might be that this guy was being eggregiously stupid and nobody stopped him before he turned his appartment into a bomb.

    But I don't put it past law enforcement that they're being excessively and destructively cautious. I know I'd be sneaking back in to get my stuff whatever the risk, because fuck them. Yeah, I really would need a specific description of why they'd want to do that "controlled burn" of an entire appartment block including everyone else's stuff also, because that's just fucking excessive. Have they even tried securing the dangerous chemicals by, oh I don't know, stuffing the affected appartment with PUR foam or something?

  25. Re:Offended or not? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

    Actually black powder and gunpowder are very sticky legal subjects in the US.

    If you think black powder is bad, you should see how the police react when they see you playing with white powder.

  26. Re:Offended or not? by TheReaperD · · Score: 2

    Had a nephew's friend make 1.75L of that shit! Field that call at at 2am! Nephew had a "four wall" conversation with him after (as my instructions included how not to be arrested by the cops).

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  27. Re: Offended or not? by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

    It's all fun and games until a residence hall is condemned.

    "Hilarious", indeed.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  28. Re:Offended or not? by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2

    "Energetic Materials" and "Energetic Materials in Application" are still still offered at a handful of schools in my state, but almost entirely for graduate students. Those used to be elective chemistry and engineering classes for undergrads during early 90's at the university I attended, but a slightly faster paced version was offered to graduate students or with department approval. I can't think of too may schools even then that offered those to undergrads back then, much less now.

    School's have really taken the "fun" out of chemistry. I'm not sitting here advocating that we everyone needs to spend a couple semesters doing nothing but say fluorine chemistry (yet another thing they don't really welcome in the lab anymore, and maybe on this one I'll say okay, but someone has still to be trained to do it. Ticking time bombs in the sand bucket in the fume hood. Fun fun fun!), but until I had energetic materials chemistry ceased to be fun.

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.