Hackathons Are Dystopian Events That Dupe People Into Working For Free, Say Sociologists (fastcompany.com)
An anonymous reader writes: That's the conclusion that two sociologists came to after observing seven hackathons over the period of one year, reports Wired. In "Hackathons As Co-optation Ritual: Socializing Workers and Institutionalizing Innovation in the 'New' Economy," sociologists Sharon Zukin and Max Papadantonakis argue that companies use the allure of hackathons to get people to work for free. They says sponsors fuel the "romance of digital innovation by appealing to the hackers' aspiration to be multi-dimensional agents of change" when in fact the hackathons are just a means of labor control.
I know that the terms are not mutually exclusive.
Read the article summary carefully:
The mask slips.
And while on the subject, please feel free to discuss non-paying Internships...
That's the definition. In practise, in a lot of cases GP isn't too far beside the mark. That doesn't mean there's no science going on at all in sociology departments, but if you read some of the papers coming out (which I do just to amuse myself from time to time), you'll see that a big part of it is an enormous echo chamber where "scientists" repeat dogma with little or no scientific basis.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
Why is it considered duping to get people excited about working on something for free? Passion is one of the greatest joys and I'd sacrifice a lot of take home pay if I could get more passion for my work. Thus breaks now and then where I get excited and work on fun challenges with other people to create something remarkable are not working for free, they are working for me.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Well, if the Hackathon is for something like OpenBSD, then I think people already know and expect the work will be free/open source and such.
If the hackathon is for a proprietary company, then the people either work for the company, or receive some sort of compensation for their work, otherwise they would retain the rights to their code; either way, it's not free work....
Didn't read TFA, but do these researchers understand what motivates people to participate?
Speaking as an established professional in a highly technical field -and as someone whose career has been further as much by hobbies and personal interests as certifications and professional experience- hackathons are in fact insanely fun, an invaluable social outlet that helps form lasting friendships and establish professional contacts, and a great way to build teamwork skills, learn new things, and challenge your abilities.
Sure, it's a challenge to build an app in a weekend (Rails Rumble), but it's fun. If that's your idea of fun.
I wonder how these researchers would describe gyms (establishments which trick you into paying money to do meaningless physical labor?), marathons, and online dating?