Slashdot Mirror


Mark Zuckerberg Addresses the Cambridge Analytica Scandal, Says Facebook 'Made Mistakes' in Protecting Data (buzzfeed.com)

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Wednesday commented on the massive, deepening data harvesting scandal his company has been embroiled in since last Friday. From a report: "We have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can't then we don't deserve to serve you. I've been working to understand exactly what happened and how to make sure this doesn't happen again," he said. The scandal -- involving the illicit collection of data from 50 million Facebook users, and its later use by Trump campaign analytics vendor Cambridge Analytica -- has helped chop off nearly $50 billion in value from Facebook's market cap since last Friday, led to calls from US lawmakers for Zuckerberg testify before congress, and raised eyebrows at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which is now probing the company. Speaking of things Facebook plans to do to ensure that this mess doesn't repeat itself, Zuckerberg added, "First, we will investigate all apps that had access to large amounts of information before we changed our platform to dramatically reduce data access in 2014, and we will conduct a full audit of any app with suspicious activity. We will ban any developer from our platform that does not agree to a thorough audit. And if we find developers that misused personally identifiable information, we will ban them and tell everyone affected by those apps. That includes people whose data Kogan misused here as well.

"Second, we will restrict developers' data access even further to prevent other kinds of abuse. For example, we will remove developers' access to your data if you haven't used their app in 3 months. We will reduce the data you give an app when you sign in -- to only your name, profile photo, and email address. We'll require developers to not only get approval but also sign a contract in order to ask anyone for access to their posts or other private data. And we'll have more changes to share in the next few days."

There is no explicit apology in Zuckerberg's comment today.

9 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Sorry I got caught defense by OffTheLip · · Score: 5, Informative

    Facebook's business model is predicated on this data collection and selling to whomever is willing to pay.

    1. Re:Sorry I got caught defense by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obama paid them with a private phone number/direct access for eight years.

      This time they're pissed because they think they were cheated, only got money.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Sorry I got caught defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5520303/Obama-campaign-director-reveals-Facebook-ALLOWED-data.html

    3. Re:Sorry I got caught defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      British Tabloids are not good sources.

    4. Re:Sorry I got caught defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      https://nypost.com/2018/03/20/obamas-former-media-director-said-facebook-was-once-on-our-side/

    5. Re:Sorry I got caught defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      COO of Facebook.

      Wikileaked email

    6. Re: Sorry I got caught defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's a financial blog closely connected to Breitbart and a few other "alt-right" sites. In other words, information value = -1.

    7. Re: Sorry I got caught defense by Escogido · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you actually read the article at the link? There are plenty of links to sources there - Time, Twitter, The Guardian etc. You can't really disregard them simply because they happened to appear in an article on a website you do not like or do not consider reputable.

  2. LOL by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's so much bullshit, because it is a damage-control response to the CA issue only.

    The problem -- of which they are deeply and keenly aware -- is MUCH larger than just CA, and has existed this way, intentionally, for YEARS.

    This is a farcical non-response, though some of the measures they are now forced to take will indeed partially address the broader issues.