Facebook Gave Data About 57 Billion Friendships To Academic (theguardian.com)
Before Facebook suspended Aleksandr Kogan from its platform for the data harvesting "scam" at the centre of the unfolding Cambridge Analytica scandal, the social media company enjoyed a close enough relationship with the researcher that it provided him with an anonymised, aggregate dataset of 57bn Facebook friendships. From a report: Facebook provided the dataset of "every friendship formed in 2011 in every country in the world at the national aggregate level" to Kogan's University of Cambridge laboratory for a study on international friendships published in Personality and Individual Differences in 2015. Two Facebook employees were named as co-authors of the study, alongside researchers from Cambridge, Harvard and the University of California, Berkeley. Kogan was publishing under the name Aleksandr Spectre at the time. A University of Cambridge press release on the study's publication noted that the paper was "the first output of ongoing research collaborations between Spectre's lab in Cambridge and Facebook." Facebook did not respond to queries about whether any other collaborations occurred. "The sheer volume of the 57bn friend pairs implies a pre-existing relationship," said Jonathan Albright, research director at the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University. "It's not common for Facebook to share that kind of data. It suggests a trusted partnership between Aleksandr Kogan/Spectre and Facebook."
this could be a major political issue if it doesn't turn out they did the same for the other side. The Dems might make it a campaign issue with FB stuck in the middle. The one thing they've got to be afraid of most is regulation. After all, you are the product. It's not the adverts where they make all their money, it's selling all that sweet, sweet demographic data.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
"Aleksandr Spectre"? Are you fucking kidding me? Was it so cartoonishly evil that Facebook's legal and ethics team didn't believe it was real?
Yeah they were both friends of Franklin , McKinley , Cleveland , Madison and Chase.
Bigly Friends.
This is kind of what Facebook does... how do you think they went from 0$ to 15 billion $ a year in advertising over a few years?
"Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
...and people are just now giving them sh!t for it?
Thanks goodness everyone hates trump so much that this important issue will finally get some traction. Sure didn't raise any eyebrows when all those other businesses/presidents/bad-actors sold our data willy-nilly.
Since Facebook's business model is built on selling user data, our response is obvious: poison the data! Create dozens of fake accounts with the most ridiculous user profiles imaginable, and friend them with random people. If we make the user data garbage enough, then it becomes useless and Facebook's business model fails.
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
What I find amusing about this whole thing is that the Trump campaign never used the data, because they didn't trust it.
The Trump campaign never used the psychographic data at the heart of a whistleblower who once worked to help acquire the data's reporting -- principally because it was relatively new and of suspect quality and value.
So Facebook giving all that data to the Trump campaign had no effect on the election whatsoever.
All this outrage and calls for regulation and boycotting - because it was Trump of course - over something that Trump didn't use.
I don't care who y'are - that's funny right thare!
Huge social media company mines data for years. Trades data for money. Are we going after google next? What about the cell phone companies? Grocery store loyalty cards?
Seriously. The people have decided.
You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
and focused on the Adverts. It's now front and center and in the minds of regular people. There's also a sizable Anti-Trump faction in America (he did lose the popular vote after all) that is going to seize on this and keep it from going away. Facebook'll end up caught in the middle of a political fight. Worst case scenario a bunch of new privacy regulations get passed that make a significant portion of their business illegal.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
They gave them money. Duh.
Any excuse to divert the blame for losing...
But without Russians:
- Jeb beats Trump
- Jeb beats Hillary
Too bad!
Really, Obama used a company run by the Mercers and Bannon? You have ANY evidence to back up that ridiculous assertion?
Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
Zucker is a fucker.
click bait bitches
Finally people are waking up to privacy/security data harvesting and brokering. !!
So does anyone know what exactly is google doing with all the school kids data being stored on servers , google docs etc...?
I don't know but wonder what it is being used for (now or in the future) how secure it is, what controls are in place, should it even be collected in the first place ?
Perhaps a simple question:- If a user deletes it....is is actually deleted or just hidden from the public... that tells you who really owns your data ?
Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, etc sell our data. When you go to these companies, I can buy who you are, your address, your pix, and most of all, your name, etc. .
With Google, I can buy clean data for stats, but it will not come with address, pix, names, OR, I can buy access to you. That is I can direct Ads at ppl that live in Houston Texas and then sell them cheap ACs from China. While I can not direct it to an individual, I can give criteria that would allow me to focus on those most likely to buy junk.
That is the right approach. It is fair, and honest. Google is not giving it to gov, unless they have a warrant. And Google has fought giving it to some of the nations that will use it for political purposes.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Lies, lies, and more lies. This claim is easily debunked. Mostly by the fact that Obama's 2nd term started in 2012 (and thus his campaign ended in 2011) and Cambridge Analytica was founded December 31 2013.
Really, Obama used a company run by the Mercers and Bannon? You have ANY evidence to back up that ridiculous assertion?
Sound to me like the libertarian GP managed to get some bad weed--free market BOOYA!!.
Is that you Joe?
It is an interesting number. Steven Pinker argued our brains evolved in extended family clan social structure. And that our brains are incapable of holding more than 200 persons. We extended the "persons" to entities. Most people can not name more than 50 friends or relatives strictly from memory. With address books and contacts etc they can stretch it to about 150 to 200 range. If asked to "like" or "dislike" people, entities, national groups, any grouping, most people can not go beyond 200 without resorting to paper, notes and other aids.
People wore distinctive clothing, religious marks, war paints and other external symbols so that strangers will know who they are. Treating aggregate groups of people and marking the whole group friendly, hostile, to be obeyed, to be ruled is a mental leap that took some 10,000 years to form. Starting from the sedentism created by domestication of dogs, then animals and then plants at around 20,000 years ago, we could become peaceful enough to live in larger and larger agglomerations by about 7000 years ago. That was the start of aggregation from clans to tribes, tribes to nations, nations to empires.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
It doesn't matter whether it had any effect on the election -- the perception on the left is that it had. To them FB will be forever tainted with the unbearable thought that it helped Trump win. If this drives people away from FB and social media, or at least curbs the addiction, that alone will be a phenomenal consequence of Trump presidency.
No they won't come to grip with it. Political dissent has been happening since the Bronze Age. If people could get along, we wouldn't have had so many stupid (civil) wars by now.
If you arent paying for something, then you are likely what is being sold.
I believe he goes by Ivan now.
Ivan Biden? Trumptards have broken brains. No wonder Putin is able to manipulate the morons so easily. Physically weak traitor bitches.
Who cares when CA was founded? Facebook is the issue here. CA just bought data from Facebook. Facebook was more than happy to sell it without any contract or enforceable terms in place. Facebook was also happy to include data that they shouldn't have been collecting (per user preferences).
Obama used Facebook data the same way. He was applauded for it.
No dumb ass, they used a company run by Zuckerberg.
It's Joe O'Biden.
Why is it when Obama's election team harvests and utilizes the same data in the same way from Facebook and other socials it is lauded as genius and clever, but when Trump's election team does it, it is a scam and criminal?
There you are shit posting again with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!
You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.
Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.
How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????
The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!
You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!
When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!
Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!
Bonus:
Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:
The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!
So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!
Signed:
Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!
Creimertards have broken brains. No wonder Creimer was able to manipulate the morons so easilly. They're still harassing the Slashdot community after creimer left Slashdot for YouTube. Sad.
Hahaha creimer; "Team Creimer" and now "creimertards"?
Everybody knows that you're alone and that there is only one creimertard, yourself you 400 pounds content digital nuisance!
Alert creimer sock puppet post to build up his karma!
CREIMER' SUBMISSIONS UPDATE:
Note also that creimer is trying to regain karma by getting his submissions published as articles on
https://slashdot.org/~_sharp'r...
https://slashdot.org/~crreimer
https://slashdot.org/~cdreimer
https://slashdot.org/~criss69
https://slashdot.org/~Anonymou...
https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
https://slashdot.org/~ILoveFat...
https://slashdot.org/~IHateFat...
https://slashdot.org/~IAteFatC...
https://slashdot.org/~ITapeFat...
https://slashdot.org/~IApeFatC...
https://slashdot.org/~IPrayFat...
https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
and mod down his submissions as well. The great thing is that you don't even need mod points to mod down a submission, just click on the "minus" icon!
Yes, believe it or not, creimer owns all the above sock puppet accounts. It is a mystery why Slashdot management tolerates it!
creimer wrote:
I don't bother with mod points. I'm doing something much more sinister. It took ten story submissions ? I'll have to double check the number ? to move cdreimer's karma from neutral to excellent without ever being exposed to the capricious mods. Mmmmmwwwwahahahahahahaha!
https://slashdot.org/comments....
Danger, Will Robinson, Danger! Creimy is posting more than 2 posts a day. Hurry! mod down otherwise /. will go to hell again!
Note: you can mod down even if already at -1 to lower karma and to prevent lost /. users to accidentally mod up.
creimer wrote:
All you need to do is find a website with a permissive TOS, say, Slashdot, create a Python script to scrape your own comments, sprinkle Amazon affiliate links in various posts, and then re-post past links whenever possible. Won't be long before you start making "coffee money" each month.
https://slashdot.org/comments....
C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."
But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!
Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king's horses
And all the king's men
Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
Together again.
Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
With "Vice President Pence Vowing US Astronauts Will Return To the Moon", we are sure they will need miracle workers up there, here is what it would look li
Why are they not required to anonymize the data ?
The research community has been doing this for a long time with medical trials, etc.
Right now they've got everyone screaming for regulation.
Guess what they're gonna get: Regulation!
What are they going to regulate? Stuff on the internet!
What is the stuff? Free Speech!
Facebook is already violating everyone's privacy for their own profit and for the US Government. Why give them more?
Hahaha creimer!
creimer has moved the talking with himself to youtube! He created the "King Slayer69" sock puppet on youtube and now argues with himself on youtube! He is more like a "King Dumpty" but anyway.
CROFLOL!
Anyway, I already filed on complaint with youtube at:
https://www.youtube.com/create...
Please complain as well, youtube is far from being "as permissive" as Slashdot!
Chris' case is getting worse, he spends all day replying to himself as AC on /.
The tests we ran on Chris have shown that Chris has the intelligence of an ameba:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So, technically, he is able to conceive some kind of agenda but it will be silly or impossible to follow on a human scale.
For example, Chris had an agenda to post anything he felt like on Slashdot which did not work well because it was based on his false beliefs that he had an infinite number of karma points as he wrote here several times.
Several people here explained to Chris that karma maxed out at some level like 50 or so but Chris kept on insisting that his python script had confirmed that he had millions of karma points!
Oh well, as I wrote before: "It isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody."
For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.
IMPORTANT UPDATE:
Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
http://www.keynamics.com/image...
Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:
Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.
To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.
The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!
Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.
I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...
Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
https://ibb.co/gVad65
Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
http://ibb.co/mRVSaG
But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.
Thank You dear users,
---
Nancy Guerrero
Director
Special Education
Santa Clara County Office of Education
Someone seriously under counted the Earths population!
The only scandal here is the shear number of people unaware that the purpose of all social media is to sell your private information...
"Google isn't free, the cost is your information" - Eric Schmidt Former CEO Google.
so just go head, fill your house with Alexa, Google home, Nest, FitBit, Apple watch, use websites to analyze your DNA... and pay no attention to those annoying little ELUA popup's where you waive all your rights. Then be shocked when they sell that information..considering it's their business model.
He created the "King Slayer69" sock puppet on youtube and now argues with himself on youtube!
Why don't you join creimer on YouTube? I'm sure he would love to ban you from his channel.
Try again
Wow, so few people have 30 year old girl friends in New York City that are willing to defend their friends like you do.
Chris sure is a lucky guy.
You have no one to ban on your channel, Chris. I don't think YouTube uses a signed int to count subscribers, so how can they track -1 followers?
Not really no.
In Obama's case Facebook users went to Obama's re-election page and were asked if they'd like to provide information. So yes they're the same in that the campaigns used Facebook data but one asked permission in a context that made it painfully obvious what it was for and the other didn't ask permission and there was no obvious link to it's purpose until years later.
So, yeah, not quite the same thing.
Obama's campaign was not relying on such data. They were spoon fed all the data they asked for from Facebook, regardless of whether they had opted in on his campaign page. Where the fuck did you get that story from?
If only there was some way to search the internet for information. I'd envision some web portal thingy where you type in a string and it searches for you, if such a thing existed in might pop up pages from say 2012 that were relevant at the time, though maybe it's possible that the same people who had the foresight to change his birth certificate had the same foresight to plant the story in case they needed it.
http://www.adweek.com/digital/...
That article describes the Facebook app his campaign used. Romney had one too.
Again the difference is the app made it painfully clear that it wasn't a quiz or a chance to win a free pony, it was to support his campaign. I don't have a Facebook page, never will so at some level I don't really give a shit, but false equivalences are false equivalences regardless.
Wait , you are say by people duped by Russians are weak traitor bitches? Uh oh...
https://www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/ryancbrooks/thousands-of-new-yorkers-took-to-the-streets-in-anti-trump
Help me understand this.
There are roughly 7.6 billion people on earth.
Consider that most people do not have Facebook accounts, thus cannot be 'friended'.
A 2017 survey shows ~2.2 billion Facebook users.
That leaves an average friends per Facebook user at 25.9.
So, then, for any researcher to have "friendships" data on me, they know who I have "friended".
How can this be "anonymised"?
Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.