Slashdot Mirror


Cops Are Now Opening iPhones With Dead People's Fingerprints (forbes.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: In November 2016, around seven hours after Abdul Razak Ali Artan had mowed down a group of people in his car, gone on a stabbing spree with a butcher's knife and been shot dead by a police officer on the grounds of Ohio State University, an FBI agent applied the bloodied body's index finger to the iPhone found on the deceased. The cops hoped it would help them access the Apple device to learn more about the assailant's motives and Artan himself.

This is according to FBI forensics specialist Bob Moledor, who detailed for Forbes the first known case of police using a deceased person's fingerprints in an attempt to get past the protections of Apple's Touch ID technology. Unfortunately for the FBI, Artan's lifeless fingerprint didn't unlock the device. In the hours between his death and the attempt to unlock, when the feds had to go through legal processes regarding access to the smartphone, the iPhone had gone to sleep and when reopened required a passcode, Moledor said. He sent the device to a forensics lab which managed to retrieve information from the iPhone, the FBI phone expert and a Columbus officer who worked the case confirmed. That data helped the authorities determine that Artan's failed attempt to murder innocents may have been a result of ISIS-inspired radicalization.

Where Moledor's attempt failed, others have succeeded. Separate sources close to local and federal police investigations in New York and Ohio, who asked to remain anonymous as they weren't authorized to speak on record, said it was now relatively common for fingerprints of the deceased to be depressed on the scanner of Apple iPhones, devices which have been wrapped up in increasingly powerful encryption over recent years. For instance, the technique has been used in overdose cases, said one source. In such instances, the victim's phone could contain information leading directly to the dealer.

5 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Is this a problem? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not sure there is a 4th amendment issue here if the suspect is dead, as they would no longer have an expectation of privacy, and the item was found after the commission of a crime. I'm open to the possibility that I'm wrong on this, looking forward to hear arguments.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  2. And the related question by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tell you what. If I'm murdered and the cops think there might be something on my phone that would tell them who murdered me, I'm cool with them using my finger to unlock it.

    Apropos of nothing, are you cool with them having an incentive for shooting you rather than taking you in, in order to get at your information?

  3. Re:Wouldn't work with FaceID... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple FaceID requires the person have that smug look of self-importance. Dead faces all appear as Windows users to FaceID.

  4. You can have access to my iPhone... by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when you unlock it with my cold, dead hands.

  5. Get a warrant by some+old+guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Body dead too long? Too bad. Get a warrant.

    Druggie too stoned to give consent? Get a warrant.

    Want to access my phone FOR ANY REASON? Get a fucking WARRANT.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.