Slashdot Mirror


China, in Search of Water, is Building a Rain-Making Network Three Times the Size of Spain (scmp.com)

China is testing cutting-edge defence technology to develop a powerful yet relatively low-cost weather modification system to bring substantially more rain to the Tibetan plateau, Asia's biggest freshwater reserve. From a report: The system, which involves an enormous network of fuel-burning chambers installed high up on the Tibetan mountains, could increase rainfall in the region by up to 10 billion cubic metres a year -- about 7 per cent of China's total water consumption -- according to researchers involved in the project. Tens of thousands of chambers will be built at selected locations across the Tibetan plateau to produce rainfall over a total area of about 1.6 million square kilometres (620,000 square miles), or three times the size of Spain. It will be the world's biggest such project.

The chambers burn solid fuel to produce silver iodide, a cloud-seeding agent with a crystalline structure much like ice. The chambers stand on steep mountain ridges facing the moist monsoon from south Asia. As wind hits the mountain, it produces an upward draft and sweeps the particles into the clouds to induce rain and snow.

111 comments

  1. You need moisture first by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This won't increase total precipitation. Either the moisture is moving and raining somewhere which doesn't run to the water table attached to the reservoir, or all of this water is already coming down as rain. Are they stealing rain from another province over?

    1. Re:You need moisture first by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, they'll use up all the water before it rains over the pacific ocean. Oh, noes, the Pacific Ocean will dry up! AAaaaaaaa!

    2. Re:You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up

    3. Re: You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also adds silver iodide to the air and rain which is of course toxic.

      Chronic Exposure/Target Organs: Chronic ingestion of iodides may produce âoeiodismâ, which may be manifested by skin rash, running nose, headache and irritation of the mucous membranes. Weakness, anemia, loss of weight and general depression may also occur. Chronic inhalation or ingestion may cause argyria characterized by blue-gray discoloration of the eyes, skin and mucous membranes. Chronic skin contact may cause permanent discoloration of the skin.(10)

    4. Re:You need moisture first by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Informative

      This seems to be in the center of a continent, and affecting water-laden air moving northward. It looks like there's 850-1,850 miles of land before this air would reach Taiwan and the East Chinese Sea. The US is 3,000 miles across.

      It looks like they could impact Gansu or Mongolia.

    5. Re:You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The moisture flows northward and much of it ends as snow which becomes ice in the Arctic.

      This has the potential to reduce the amount of Arctic ice cover significantly.

    6. Re: You need moisture first by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      At what levels.

      Everything is toxic at a particular level. Stop fearmongering.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:You need moisture first by RandomFactor · · Score: 5, Informative

      This particular question is addressed at the very end of TFA. Sounds like there is a real concern with reducing the rainfall of other regions of China.

      Reducing the rainfall in regions other than China is not mentioned as a consideration.

      Beijing might not give the green light for the project either, he added, as intercepting the moisture in the skies over Tibet could have a knock-on effect and reduce rainfall in other Chinese regions.

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    8. Re:You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's because if the history of China is any indicator, they won't give a fuck what happens outside of China, including areas that they consider to be China, but the rest of the world (and those areas themselves) considers to be completely different countries.

    9. Re: You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me thinks hard the subject naked water before ocean die hippy scum

    10. Re:You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the dumbest idea to try storing rain water as snow and ice in Tibet/Himalayas. A lot of the water China and S. Asia, and SE Asia get their water from rivers that start in that area. With better storage + irrigation techniques, this could a net benefit for everyone.

    11. Re:You need moisture first by zieroh · · Score: 2

      If this isn't man-made climate change, I don't know what is.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    12. Re:You need moisture first by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      This seems to be in the center of a continent, and affecting water-laden air moving northward.

      Hmm, center of Asia, water-laden air moving northwards...

      Who could possibly be effected by this sort of thing? After all, there's noone north of China, after all.

      What's that you say? Russia? Nah, couldn't be!

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:You need moisture first by houghi · · Score: 0

      The moment you hear China and Tibet in the same article, you should wonder if the article holds information with what China REALLY wants to do with Tibet.

      I am sure that the Chinese scientists are not that stupid and just use this as a front to infiltrate Tibet even further. It is a nice story how Tibet is now helping China, so all is good. This is nothing more than propaganda.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re: You need moisture first by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they are planning to put a LOT of silver into the air. It's going to come down somewhere ... Iodine is at least biologically useful ...

    15. Re:You need moisture first by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      That's what I want to know more or less, except bigger: How would such a thing affect global weather patterns? Does the Chinese government even give a rat's ass about that? Betting they don't.

    16. Re:You need moisture first by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Well now, there's your answer to climate change, and rising oceans.

      That's sarcasm, in case someone doesn't figure that out.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    17. Re:You need moisture first by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's entirely possible that these airmasses aren't going to rain or snow anywhere after passing over the Tibetan Plateau. Getting up to the level of the plateau -- 14000 feet and up -- involves a lot of orographic uplift and squeezing out of moisture. Once they move on to lower elevation areas, they will drop and warm. The resulting humidity may well be too low to support precipitation.

      The article, if you actually read the whole thing, acknowledges that there may not be a lot of moisture there to extract even in Tibet. It also makes it clear that this is only a proposal and has not been approved by Beijing.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    18. Re: You need moisture first by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Everything is toxic at a particular level.

      You don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

      Not everything has an LDLo or LD50.

      https://biology.stackexchange....

    19. Re:You need moisture first by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I'm still working on, "enormous network of fuel-burning chambers" I guess China being next to the worlds largest body of water, a.k.a.Pacific Ocean, is an ignorable fact?

    20. Re:You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You first.

    21. Re:You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe their swamps will dry up.

      captcha: valuable

    22. Re: You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The voted best answer on the link you posted supports his comment, not yours. Well done!

      Summary: No, the human body can not tolerate an unlimited volume of anything, therefore there is no substance that is non-toxic "at any dose."

    23. Re: You need moisture first by sheramil · · Score: 1

      It also adds silver iodide to the air and rain which is of course toxic.

      It could be worse. In his novel "The Caryatids", Bruce Sterling had them doing something similar, using nuclear fusion bombs.

    24. Re: You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absloutely not. You see upcoming currents will not change, they only get laiden with particles from the tibetan plateau. Expect a few more glaciers to drop dramatically in Iceland, and even less rain from California to Afghanistan. China is not the first to do this, essentially we are creating dwnse wet spots on the weather map with drier areas elsewhere. Like a wet / dry checkboard.

    25. Re: You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word salad is a symptom of schizophrenia.

    26. Re:You need moisture first by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The US also is next to the Pacific, but we don't plan on using it to satisfy water needs in the Midwest. The Midwest gets its water from rain and snow melt in what is mostly the Mississippi watershed. If we wanted the Midwest to be wetter, we'd want more rain and snow in that watershed, not a project to import water from the Pacific. Similarly, the Chinese are talking about more rain in areas quite a bit away from the coast.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re:You need moisture first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do what Israel did, 50 years of planting trees. And they have not stopped planting trees.

    28. Re:You need moisture first by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 0

      Here's an idea. Swallow my cock faggot!

  2. A Zero-Sum Game? by VirginMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder who may loose out on the rain then? Also, I bet, China won't give a rat's ass as long as they have the stronger military and with annual growth of military spending in the double digits the rest of the world should better look out.

    --
    When 1person suffers from a delusion,it is called insanity.When many people suffer from a delusion,it is called religion
    1. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wonder who may loose out on the rain then?

      If it works perfectly, this will divert some of the monsoon moisture to China. End result would be slightly less destructive rains on one side, and slightly more drinkable water on the other (where "slightly" may be an enourmous number in human-scale terms, but is fairly small compared to the total numbers involved).

    2. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it'll disrupt rain patterns in the area.

      And this is just the beginning of how population pressures and global warming are going to affect people. If folks think we have an immigration problem now, just wait 20 years. The World is going to have some serious environmental and resource problems to contend with as well as the innate tribalism and xenophobia most people's have.

      And a wall or walls at our borders? Pffft! Won't do jack shit other than waste money. See, there's something called boats.....

    3. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by hey! · · Score: 2

      The trade winds bend fairly north in Asia, so that the prevailing winds in Tibet run from northeast to southwest, unlike most of the continental US at that latitude where westerlies prevail.

      So if moisture is falling on the Tibetan plateau, it's not falling in the northern parts of South Asia. If China succeeds, I believe the losers will be Nepal, the Punjab, and possibly eastern Pakistan -- places that receive a mild fall northeast monsoon coming down from the Himalayas but not the more potent and well-known southeasterly summer monsoon. South Asian slashdotters, feel free to correct me.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2

      If it works perfectly

      Was it really necessary to make me spray coffee all over my screen this early in the morning?

    5. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by Adolf+Hitler,+Jr. · · Score: 3, Funny

      Was it really necessary to make me spray coffee all over my screen this early in the morning?

      Ewwww, who keeps coffee in a spray bottle?

    6. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by hey! · · Score: 1

      The monsoon is a seasonal change in prevailing winds. The summer monsoon, which runs from July to September, transports huge amounts of moisture from the Indian Ocean. Northern South Asia also has a winter monsoon, that runs from October to April, and brings modest rains in the first few months.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      "Less destructive rains" like that destructive flooding of the Nile that Mubarak's dam stopped?

      You know, the flooding that was driving organic salts and detreitus miles inland, making the west bank fertile and allowing farmers to produce high yields.

      Stopping the destructive flooding of the Nile also devastated Egypt's capacity to produce food. It was an enormous, expensive project that destroyed their economy and created famine.

      How destructive are these monsoons?

    8. Re: A Zero-Sum Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You so smarter than everyone. No they no think that. But you see big idea. Better than many experts. Just one person knows most. I vote you me come over border next week. I network engineer I can work. Make space me will better deal for company.

    9. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smellin' a lot of "if" comin' off of that plan.

    10. Re:A Zero-Sum Game? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

      This is incorrect. The Himalayas act as a barrier and nothing comes "from tibet".
      The Monsoon is SW and SE (From Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal)

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    11. Re: A Zero-Sum Game? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...loose

      You sure you're a virgin??

  3. cheaper rain making nwtwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put a hotspot in the strip club

  4. how this research breakthrough came to be by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    professor higgins: "the rain in spain stays mainly in the plain"
    chinese scientists: ...hold my oolong...

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:how this research breakthrough came to be by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      The rain in China goes mostly on my...oh my.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:how this research breakthrough came to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment wins the internet for the day

    3. Re:how this research breakthrough came to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rain, it raineth on the just
      And on the unjust fella.
      But mainly on the just, because
      The unjust stole the just's umbrella.

  5. It's not "rain-making" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more like rain moving. The moisture is going to fall somewhere. They are just saying where and when.

    So whereare they moving the rain from?

    It seems a little worrysome given the poor state of climate science. Hopefully, if it cause an issue they can just stop and put things back to where they were.

    1. Re:It's not "rain-making" by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      " they can just stop and put things back to where they were" wrong question, will they want to. I suppose if it causes problems for their country, such as massive uncontrollable flooding, they might put it back. But as long as the negative impact to them is minimal and it gives them more resources, what would be their incentive? I can think of a few but those fall under 'might makes right'.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  6. bad for other countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wont this have repurcussions on other countries? I am guessing all the water will end on China...

    1. Re:bad for other countries by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Who has the resources and guts to stand up to them?

      China has the worlds largest population, and a large land area (About the same as the United States) if forced into a war-time economy they would be able to kick the butt of any other nation. Including the United States which has the largest standing army, but China has a potential army.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:bad for other countries by CodeHog · · Score: 2

      You're assuming that potential army has enough incentive to fight. See the Vietnam military action for an example. Water is a good reason to fight but will it incite the common person enough? Assuming the potential army would be made up of primarily common people. Also, training. I wonder how the water situation in South Africa is impacting the society there.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    3. Re:bad for other countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wont this have repurcussions on other countries? I am guessing all the water will end on China...

      So am I to understand that they want to create a drought-free Tibet?

      Thanks, folks. I'll be here all night.

    4. Re: bad for other countries by Camarillo+Brillo · · Score: 2

      Yea, like Tibet. Its sad that the Chineese government had to murder so many peaceful Bhuddists to feed their insatiable growth and egos.

  7. Silver Iodide by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Isn't it kind of expensive to use up all that silver? Or does it not really use very much silver? (Or is that just a name?)

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Silver Iodide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They take iodide and they paint it with a rattle can of silver paint.

    2. Re:Silver Iodide by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      They take iodide and they paint it with a rattle can of silver paint.

      See? That would be cheaper! I don't know why scientists never listen to me, I even built my own rocket.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. Soil bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will all that silver have an effect on soil bacteria?

    1. Re:Soil bacteria by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is China you're talking about. You shoot first, ask environmental questions later.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Soil bacteria by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's possible they are learning. TFA does mention that the government might not green light it because they are worried about the down-stream effects (no pun intended).

      China has been pushing really hard, maybe harder than anyone to clean up its environment and deal with climate change. They started in a very bad place, hit peak coal a few years ago, installed more wind than the rest of the world combined... It's not perfect by any means but they seem to be serious about it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Soil bacteria by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They're definitely learning. The question is how quickly and how evenly is the experience applied. E.g., coal is probably not popular right now, but I guess the main reason is the air in large cities. How the "less visible" environmental issues are perceived right now in China, I have no idea.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re: Soil bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep the air pollution in cities was affecting the emperor and nobles, ahem, I mean communist leadership. That'll be why action was taken.

  9. Why not desalinization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean unless the plan is to weaponize weather control why go through such a project?

    1. Re:Why not desalinization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's obviously an intent to weaponize weather - it says right in TFS "cutting edge defense technology".

      Poison drywall, poison toothpaste, poison dogfood, and now poison rain. Chinese leaders are mimicking Jack Nicholson's joker

    2. Re:Why not desalinization by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the Tibetan plateau has few coastlines to supply the salt water for desalinization.

  10. Must be all that medieval silver they hogged by gDLL · · Score: 1

    All that new world silver the spaniards were pillaging went to china, and they don't like to share :), except for opium.... http://www.chineseargent.com/h...

  11. Give this man some +mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Finally, that line has a purpose.

    Thanks for the laugh.

  12. Nice try, Quang! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Yellow Menace is stealing our precious bodily fluids!

    1. Re:Nice try, Quang! by jdschulteis · · Score: 2
      I guess rain water is no longer viable for replenishment of our precious bodily fluids.

      We're down to just distilled water, and pure grain alcohol.

  13. So they are stealing rain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By forcing rain to fall on Chinese soil... they are effectively inducing a drought elsewhere. Say now, the south of Russia becomes incredibly dry because there is no rain. China has no regard for absolutely anything. They take a technology and simply use it, asking no questions.

    What are the dry-to-be countries in the area do, then?

    1. Re:So they are stealing rain... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What are the dry-to-be countries in the area do, then?

      War. Which is exactly what would happen if there isn't some form of offset such as China selling crops at a greatly reduced price to those areas and so on.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:So they are stealing rain... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      What are the dry-to-be countries in the area do, then?

      War. Which is exactly what would happen if there isn't some form of offset such as China selling crops at a greatly reduced price to those areas and so on.

      Yea... and we think resource wars over oil are vicious...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  14. Desalination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would RO desalination plants be cheaper?

    1. Re:Desalination by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Would RO desalination plants be cheaper?

      Than a small device burning a chemical? Not likely. Desalination plants are expensive and cranky of maintenance.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Desalination by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Than thousands of devices burning a chemical. Plus, delivering the chemical fuel to each of the devices. Repairing them, replacing them, etc, etc, etc....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re: Desalination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's China. Man power is essentially free.

  15. What could possibly go wrong? by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm no climatologist, but China mass-draining the monsoons of suspended water can't have anything but nearly catastrophic effects on down-wind ecosystems that have evolved over hundreds of millions of years to exist compatibly with current moisture patterns.

    If they pull the moisture out of the air to get it to fall in Tibet, then it won't be there to fall wherever those air currents normally dump it - Eastern Russia, Northern China, or maybe even Japan. It would seem that relatively-dessicated air masses may behave unpredictably as well.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Unless it goes the same way many large projects in China go...in the dumpster. But it will probably cause ecological havoc before they admit they screwed up. Then it will takes years of them denying there was any ecological havoc while they pray for auspicious circumstances to magically make it work. After Ping goes Pong, they may decide to pull the plug.

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      All during which the world's ecologically-conscious community will continue to attack Trump for....reasons.

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Reasons being that he's so much worse environmentally than previous US Presidents, and at least the US population can exert pressure on him and Congress. I have a very tiny impact on how the US is run, and none at all on how China is run.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  16. Could be bad for their neighbors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who will be losing their usually rainfall?

  17. Climate aggression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article brings up the idea of climate wars in which a nation-state substantially affects the weather to damage another’s interests. What if I could prevent 80% of the rain falling on your land? What if I could provoke floods or hurricanes? Ten feet of snow? What if tornados could be targeted?

    1. Re:Climate aggression by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Hungry people are dangerous. Of course the Chinese military can handle their neighbors okay.

    2. Re:Climate aggression by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      This article brings up the idea of climate wars in which a nation-state substantially affects the weather to damage another’s interests.

      It would also create win-win situation, bringing more water in China while removing excess water from flood suffering neighbor. The real problem is that we have no clue of actual consequences.on our actions on such a complex system.

  18. Take that by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    Manmade Climate Change deniers. /s

    Seriously, is there weather modeling software that can do some predictive analysis of what this means to everyone else in the region? And what impact this meddling may have on global weather patters?

    1. Re:Take that by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      weather predication is extremely complex and terribly inaccurate the further out in time you go. They have to use multiple models to even get close just a few days out. And those predictions can quickly change. They're getting better though.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  19. Desalinization plant by pablo_max · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems a bit more practical to build some desalinization plants. From what I have understood, recent advancements in membrane tech would make it far cheaper than in the past. Plus, there is the added benefit of lithium production.

    https://www.ft.com/content/107...

    1. Re:Desalinization plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The area they are talking about has at least 500km of other people's countries between it and the nearest sea.

  20. Health effects via food production? by DrTJ · · Score: 2

    The collected rain will probably be used for food production and drinking water. If the crops accumulate this silver iodide and then ingested, then what happens?

    It is not entirely safe. From toxnet (https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+2930):

    (It does not mention increased cancer risk, however, and no concentrations are mentioned, and hopefully the concentrations will be small)

    1) MILD TO MODERATE ORAL TOXICITY: Patients with mild
    ingestions may only develop irritation or grade I
    (superficial hyperemia and edema) burns of the
    oropharynx, esophagus or stomach; acute or chronic
    complications are unlikely. Patients with moderate
    toxicity may develop grade II burns (superficial
    blisters, erosions and ulcerations) are at risk for
    subsequent stricture formation, particularly
    esophageal. Some patients (particularly young
    children) may develop upper airway edema.
    a) Alkaline corrosive ingestion may produce burns to the
    oropharynx, upper airway, esophagus and occasionally
    stomach. Spontaneous vomiting may occur. The absence
    of visible oral burns does NOT reliably exclude the
    presence of esophageal burns. The presence of
    stridor, vomiting, drooling, and abdominal pain are
    associated with serious esophageal injury in most
    cases.
    b) PREDICTIVE: The grade of mucosal injury at endoscopy
    is the strongest predictive factor for the occurrence
    of systemic and GI complications and mortality.
    2) SEVERE ORAL TOXICITY: May develop deep burns and
    necrosis of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Complications
    often include perforation (esophageal, gastric, rarely
    duodenal), fistula formation (tracheoesophageal,
    aortoesophageal), and gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea and, rarely, fever
    may develop. Stricture formation (esophageal, less
    often oral or gastric) is likely to develop long term.
    Esophageal carcinoma is another long term

  21. Is this a hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rains are squeezed out of the monsoons by the Himalaya's and related mountains. There is no moisture left to seed after that. This is ridiculous.

  22. Idiots are ruining everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is literally a pain to see what is happening to Tibet. Chinese are destroying everything they could.

    1. Re: Idiots are ruining everything by Camarillo+Brillo · · Score: 1

      Its the government of China that is causung genocide in Tibet...it's citizens are kept from knowing the truth. Bur realize, the same things happen in the US and othet countries too. Can you imagine what North America wad like before Europeans killed the natives and paved paradise?

  23. Is it too difficult to just plan more trees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, they have the manpower. They could use their scientists to determine the needed extension of land and its optimum location to cover with trees. That way they would naturally get more rain, retain more water in the soil, clean up the air, and reduce the risk of landslides, etc.

    I'm not an ambientalist nor a scientist (heck, I didn't even read TFA), but using fuel-burning chambers seems like a very poor and short-term "remedy".

  24. The question you should always ask, by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    about China's intentions when they 'develop' anything in the hinterlands, is how this will assist them in destroying or diminishing the indigenous, non-Chinese, population.

    Especially in Tibet.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  25. How much silver is that? by hydrodog · · Score: 2

    Aside from the climate effects, what is the effect of putting a lot of siilver in the environment? Is everyone in China going to come down with Argyria? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:How much silver is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't silver antimicrobial? Surely that must have an effort on the ecosystem.

  26. How harmful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good read:
        http://www.ranches.org/cloudseedingharmful.htm

    "The question is not that is cloud seeding harmful, but how harmful."

    I wouldn't want to be a worker at one of the seeding factories.

  27. The last time I seeded a cloud by jaymemaurice · · Score: 2

    The last time I seeded a cloud, I just had to install OpenStack

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  28. Re:Kim Jong Un's Speech at Banquet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    our common commitment to consolidate the socialist systems of the two countries and ensure wellbeing and a bright future for the two peoples

    The double-speak these tyrants spout is amazing.

    captcha: really

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. That's what she said by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Also install beavers on every little creek which will help as they build deep ponds that cut into evaporation compared to wide shallow ones while building up water stores and reclaiming land from scrub.

    This from PBS last night.

    Oh, also the beaver family installs will warm your heart.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  31. Global economy will be impacted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UK is on the Sterling. Throwing away silver in great quantities should have a negative effect on the Sterling.

  32. Do people not learn from their mistakes or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silver Iodine is a toxic substance and should not be used.

    China is totally destroying our environment at a global scale.

    http://www.ranches.org/cloudseedingharmful.htm

  33. Spain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want rain, they should make it 10 times the size of England, not 3 times the size of Spain.

  34. Oblig. Alt-Historical Quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1). "I claim this rain in the Name of Spain!"
    2). "The Rain in Spain falls Mainly in Manchuria!"
    3). "Remember to Tibet your server!"

  35. All this rain over China will cause a ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    butterfly to flap its wings at the Southern tip of Argentina!

  36. If you are willing to give up beachfront... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or build out over the sea near the coastline, you can already desalinate sea water for essentially free using a sun still. The way it works is basically having a themal absorbing layer beneath an angled glass or polished surface, with a collection tray above the bottom, which is filled with seawater, but below the sealed glass lid. The small versions of these can collect a gallon or two a day, during sunny hours. Do a few large versions of these, possibly with heaters built into the bottom layer for boiling water during non-ideal environment conditions and you can get a lot of freshwater for a comparatively small outlay of capital in exchange for a large outlay of space.

    The benefit to this over the desalinization plants is a reduction in the average required energy, less membranes for a reverse osmosis setup, and no change of saltwater contamination of the freshwater side of the system in the case of membrane failure.

  37. Where's Algore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like a job for hydro oxide credits!

  38. When the US did something like this... by Doctrinsograce · · Score: 1

    I remember when the US did something like this. There was such an international hue and cry that it was given over. Of course nowadays we have to be nice to totalitarians, so we'll probably not complain.