Slashdot Mirror


US To Seek Social Media Details From All Visa Applicants (bloomberg.com)

According to Bloomberg, the State Department wants to require all U.S. visa applicants to submit their social media usernames, previous email addresses and phone numbers. From the report: In documents to be published in Friday's Federal Register, the department said it wants the public to comment on the proposed new requirements, which will affect nearly 15 million foreigners who apply for visas to enter the U.S. each year. The new rules would apply to virtually all applicants for immigrant and non-immigrant visas. The department estimates it would affect 710,000 immigrant visa applicants and 14 million non-immigrant visa applicants, including those who want to come to the U.S. for business or education, according to the documents. If the requirements are approved by the Office of Management and Budget, applications for all visa types would list a number of social media platforms and require the applicant to provide any account names they may have had on them over the previous five years. It would also give the applicant the option to volunteer information about social media accounts on platforms not listed in the application. In addition to their social media histories, visa applicants will be asked for five years of previously used telephone numbers, email addresses, international travel and deportation status, as well as whether any family members have been involved in terrorist activities. Only applicants for certain diplomatic and official visa types may be exempted from the requirements, the documents said.

43 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. Enough is enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess I won't be travelling to the US anymore.

    1. Re:Enough is enough by Nohbdey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As an American, that sucks. Forget the hate on this site. You WILL be missed, as will the millions of others who choose not visit this country now that more and more barriers are put in place.

    2. Re:Enough is enough by coastwalker · · Score: 2

      America is not the only destination in the world. Sure we grind our teeth and visit for business but it is not a compelling place to visit for other reasons these days. The world at one time was begining to look like a global village, it seems to be breaking up again as differences rather than commonalities become highlighted. The times they are a changing indeed.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    3. Re:Enough is enough by Kohath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your email address and Twitter handle are private?

      Did you shake with rage when you had to give out your name and birth date to apply for a passport?

    4. Re:Enough is enough by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes,
      my twitter handle, my youtube handle, my facebook name, my slashdot name are private.
      No idea why you think otherwise and what it is the business of an visa application to know them.

      What is next? A special page in everyones passport where he has to register all social media accounts?
      Is slashdot a social media? After all I have friends and fans here ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Enough is enough by Potor · · Score: 2

      Ok, what is your name, twitter handle, and phone number?

    6. Re: Enough is enough by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      Spelling mistakes do happen. So do reading mistakes. The Register had an article on the confusion caused by using "expertsexchange" as a username and a .dom web page. Could anyone remember every single randomly assigned email address used by universities.

      Here's a memorable one:

      https://mobile.twitter.com/meg...

    7. Re:Enough is enough by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So easy answer. Social media accounts, don't remember having any, what's the penalty, wont let me in OK, done. Previous email addresses, oh yeah, er, fuck off, how the fuck would I know all the possible ones buried in all the possible web mail services, past companies email servers, past ISPs et al. Want an email, here have this one, I formally communicate with it, I don't remember having any others the user name and or the passwords. Phone numbers, here is the phone number to contact me with regard to visa queries, all the others, what others? Not truthful, meh, to the best of my reflection it is.

      The US could run afoul of other countries laws in the amount of information it is requiring, keeping in mind that request is being sent to that country under threat of penalty, that countries government has to accept it as reasonable otherwise travel and reciprocity problems will occur.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Enough is enough by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

      the food is good though.

      it's not a bad place to visit. just don't go outside in underwear to be shot and all that.

      anyways, who do you think they'll catch with this? you think
      someone will put on a twitter they're tweeting ISIS threats from?

      or a phone number they've been sending bomb threats? besides the phone numbers in lot of countries get reused often. it's more likely they will have false positives than actual positives - well that and retards terrorists who are seriously retarded anyways.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  2. The key number here is 15 million per year by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's 41,000 per day, every day. No one is even going to follow up to see if the first alias listed even exists, let alone have time to verify its authenticity. This isn't even security theatre, it's security elevator music.

    1. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      This isn't for security reasons; the government plans to monetize this information and sell it to immigration law firms, employment recruiters, etc. Hey, everyone is doing it.

    2. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's 41,000 per day, every day. No one is even going to follow up to see if the first alias listed even exists, let alone have time to verify its authenticity.

      That's 41,000 per day now. If that requirement hits, it may be thousands and thousands less.
      Since there is no security benefit, I can only assume the goal is to prevent people from traveling to US so much. I am sure the tourist industry / travel industry would love that.

    3. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not security-anything. The purpose is to humiliate all applicants. You don't need to follow up on them.

      You can occasionally randomly follow up on what some people didn't include, look for them on whatever website they say they're not on, find them if they lied poorly, and then reject their application. That seems like a pretty great way to make people unhappier, though I'm not saying it's the only viable way to approach it so they shouldn't specify this in the new regs.

      Why do you think you take your shoes off at TSA checkpoints? It's to make you acknowledge that you're their bitch, that's why. They don't just want to humiliate you, and you unflinchingly take it; you have to participate in it. I think this social media thing is a reasonable extension of this.

      The big question is: why is this limited to Visa applicants? Shouldn't they be doing this to citizens too? Maybe the Visa aspect is just a trial run.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    4. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They’ll only investigate the ones from Yemen and Libya. They have to ask for everyone's because otherwise some ridiculous Federal judges will tell them they can't look into applications from Yemen and Libya.

    5. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      You take your shoes off because some nut tried to sneak in a bomb in his shoes three months after 9/11. Your UID is lower than mine, so you remember that too.

    6. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by sabri · · Score: 2

      That's 41,000 per day now. If that requirement hits, it may be thousands and thousands less. Since there is no security benefit, I can only assume the goal is to prevent people from traveling to US so much. I am sure the tourist industry / travel industry would love that.

      Read between the lines. If you look here, you'll see that only 7,432,515 B1/B2 (tourist and business) visas were issued. That's a little over 20k per day. A large percentage of these will be business visitors.

      The total number of arrivals for 2017 is 54,973,043. That's a little over 150k per day. So your visa-based tourists and business travelers together make up ~13% of yearly travelers to the U.S.

      Remember that a lot of countries are exempt from the visa requirements through the Visa Waiver Program.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    7. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      Are you asking for a friend?

    8. Re:The key number here is 15 million per year by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guarantee you, when they make me take off my shoes transiting a US airport after twelve hours of flying, it's not me who's suffering.

    9. Re: The key number here is 15 million per year by houghi · · Score: 2

      As a tourist there are several things i can do:
      Fill out nothing and risk that I ruined the the vacation for my family.
      Give them fake info and risk they notice and ruin the vacation for my family.
      Give them everything and risk the vacation as well, because I forgot that one login from 5 years ago.
      Do not do anything and visit another interesting place.

      Guess what I will be doing. I dp not want to ask my 16 year old kid to hand me over his secret social media accounts to me.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  3. Re:A better idea: by snookerdoodle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps because some of them come here as tourists and spend money.

  4. Re:A better idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know that it is required to have a B-2 Visa (Tourism and Visit) to enter the US as a tourist, right? Now, don't you feel stupid? Or do you intend for all foreign tourists to be replaced by domestic tourists, since we all come and "steal your jobs"? I guess that the tourist industry don't want customers over there. Well, with the people like you around and laws like these, I sure have crossed off the US from my list of countries to visit (again).

    Look at the statistics of your own State Department (PDF) and note that the visas for business visits or tourist visits far outnumber any other visa by at least one, if not two or three magnitudes.

    So stop being a racist moron and get your head out of your ass!

  5. Hilariously hypocritical by quonset · · Score: 2

    We're going to force people to turn over their information simply to see if they said anything wrong while our so-called president hides what's on his tax returns.

    Who do you think can do more damage?

  6. Does that mean ICQ? by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    I think I might be able to dig up my ICQ account number.

    But what about all of those through away emails that I created on hotmail, let alone all of the ISPs that I have had email through?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  7. Re:Just following the lead from other countries by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

    Pretty big difference between a Visa application and a Citizenship application.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  8. I like Americans... by MindPrison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...I always have, and I always will.

    But I don't have to like their government, and most of the Americans I know, don't like them very much either, but it's theirs - and right now, all they got, they got to deal with it.

    Sadly, because of the draconian laws and orwellian rules bestowed on travelers and tourists to the U.S. I won't be spending my tourist money there either, and that's sad - because I spend a lot. Just the last vacation, I spent roughly 4000$ in just one month, Four thousand dollars may not sound like a lot, but it's still money to some, the year before that I spent nearly 6000$ there.

    I still WANT to go, because I love to meet my American friends in person, and they have roots in our countries too (as you may know, most of America consists of immigrants), and a lot of them stem from Scandinavia. But I'm a stickler for freedom - and I believe strongly in my rights, and no way - no how - will anyone force me to give up my entire history, no matter what excuse they hide under.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  9. Re:Tourists don't need Visa's by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Informative

    You don't need a Visa for vacation, you need a passport from your country of residence. Visa's are required for school or working in the US.

    Correct, as long as your country of citizenship (not residence) is in the visa-waiver program. Otherwise you need a visa to visit the USA.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  10. Re:A better idea: by admin7087 · · Score: 2

    No more people visiting your country. You're gonna be safe. Splendid idea.

  11. Not always... by YuppieScum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For countries that participate in the visa-waiver programme, such as the UK, just an I-94 is required to be filled in before landing.

    At least, that was the case the last time I travelled there. If this new nonsense gets enacted, then that will have been the last time...

    Of course, this will serve no useful purpose - anyone trying to get in with malicious intent will have prepared an innocuous set of social media content, but anyone sensible who eschews FB and their ilk will get pulled out of line for some special questioning...

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:Not always... by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      Except that I-94 now also contains optional "media profiles" field.

  12. Re:Paranoia by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    USA 1945 != USA 2018

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  13. hm? by supernova87a · · Score: 2

    What's the value of a worthless request like this? If someone simply says they have no such account, how is the government going to refute him/her?

    1. Re:hm? by BitterOak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's the value of a worthless request like this? If someone simply says they have no such account, how is the government going to refute him/her?

      Well, suppose you say you have no such account. Then you show up at the border and they decide to search your phone. Then you're screwed.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:hm? by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If someone simply says they have no such account, how is the government going to refute him/her?

      Given the number of border crossings, it is unlikely anyone is going to look at the data when you enter. It may be cross-referenced to existing databases of suspected terrorist identities online, maybe.

      However, this will become of interest if you are involved in any trouble here, since a failure to report information will make your entry a clear violation of 8 USC 1325 and thus increase the likelyhood you will be prosecuted for criminal offenses related to illegal entry.

  14. Re:A better idea: by johanw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't worry, there are plenty of other countries where they can spend their money.

  15. The era of easy international travel is over by mattmarlowe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Being able to travel all over the world w/o substantial scrutiny or barriers is a relatively modern event, and was perhaps simply a temporary anomaly resulting from a brief period where long distance travel was easier than getting detailed information about travelers across borders.

    In any case, this isn't a USA specific issue.

    As an American with conservative political beliefs, I would not feel safe traveling to the UK or Europe. The UK just imprisoned a US Traveler for 3 days just because they didn't like his/her political beliefs. Europe is worse, who knows what laws I might break by speaking my mind?

    No country is perfect, and now that countries are engaged in the modern fad of encouraging only politically correct speech - all of them are taking advantage of the influx of information about travelers.

    1. Re:The era of easy international travel is over by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The UK just imprisoned a US Traveler for 3 days just because they didn't like his/her political beliefs. Europe is worse, who knows what laws I might break by speaking my mind?
      You are an idiot ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:The era of easy international travel is over by popoutman · · Score: 2

      Citation needed on the "imprisoned for 3 days for beliefs".

      --
      - This sig deliberately left blank. Nothing to see, move along.
  16. Here's my public comment by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is fucking stupid. For any number of reasons, but the main one is that there are countries which will reciprocally put the same requirement on US citizens visiting them. And then if I go to one of those countries, I'll have to admit that I have a Google Plus account. Embarrassing.

  17. Re:Once upon a time... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    Most people use Facebook to check on what their old girlfriends are doing.. Donald Trump uses PornHub!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  18. Re: A better idea: by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Informative

    You may want to look up the meaning of the word "generally".

    Or you could try scrolling further down on the page you linked, to where it says:

    "Citizens of Canada and Bermuda do not require visas to enter the United States, for visit, tourism and temporary business travel purposes"

  19. Re: Tourists? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can look up the stats if you want to get a nice quantitative measurement of risk. You're somewhere in the neighbourhood of ten times safer from violent death if you visit wester Europe instead of the US. The incarceration rate in the US is around 5 to 10 times higher than most western European countries (or other notable destinations such as Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan or China). I couldn't find stats on the relative rate of incarceration of foreigners.

  20. Class issues. by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let us begin with "ebil 'muricans".

    If you are the type of person who would type something like this, you already are an embarrassment to your country, your family, and humanity in general.

    While I don't agree with the "twitter length" post by the AC before you, your response is precisely what makes America "the land of the under achiever".

    My European family was sent to the gas chambers while my American family could not sign up to fight. An unfortunate side effect of being short, fat, and Jewish. Afterwards, much of my family went to Israel to become some of the worst of the Zionists. Those left behind supported legally, vocally, and financially the establishment of the most racist government ever.

    I believe truly that in WWII, your even more primitive ancestry stormed the beaches of Normandy and 75 years later believe the world should pay homage to the dependents of all those great people, and their neighbors, and their dogs.

    But if you understood why WWII happened, you would realize that all those people died not because of Hitler, but because of the English and the French driving the German people to the point where supporting Hitler made sense.

    1) Unless you are a 100 WWII veteran or a 80 year old who lost their father to the war, you need to move on. The world and its people have changed.

    2) If the last positive contribution you can cite or feel is suitable to cite was the performance of your club wielding adolescent ancestors and their performance wielding said clubs against the teenage children of the other side until a team of German immigrants managed to create a bomb that when unleashed burned 129000 (mostly civilians) alive while Truman made empty threats like "I can keep doing this all day".... you truly are some of the worst humanity has to offer. At least cite the Marshal plan.

    3) No one outside of America has any point of reference to even attempt to understand what "ebil 'murican" is. I, as an "ebil 'murican" required assistance from Google to decipher such gibberish.

    4) Once the war ended, the people would likely have noticed difference. People rarely do notice much in that sense. We wake, we work, we eat, we sleep. The Nazis weren't trying to kill everyone in the world as you suggest. They aimed for the most obviously different groups. This is similar to what your brethren do with Muslims ad Hispanics.See, if you can accuse people who look different than you of trying to take unfairly what you covet, you can blame them for you not having more. The Nazi would have ruled, but if you consider China, a country united though force by a military leadership who preaches pure blood propaganda... of the 1.4 billion people who they govern...maybe 10% would notice if they had democracy tomorrow.

    I think what I'm trying to say is that the behavior of your ilk is precisely the reason why wars based on patriotic nonsense occur. Consider that the many great people contributed to the ending of WWII, but it took far more fools like you to start it.

  21. Re: A better idea: by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 2

    You may want to look up the meaning of the word "generally".

    Or you could try scrolling further down on the page you linked, to where it says:

    "Citizens of Canada and Bermuda do not require visas to enter the United States, for visit, tourism and temporary business travel purposes"

    You may think and it feels like you don't require a visa, but trust me as a Canadian who travels somewhat frequently to the US, you *do* get a rubber-stamp temporary visa.

    You might think you didn't get it or need it.

    --
    Corporate Gadfly
    Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history