macOS 10.13.4 Enables Support for External GPU (engadget.com)
With the latest release of macOS High Sierra, Apple has officially delivered on a couple of items in the works since WWDC 2017 last June. macOS 10.13.4 brings the external GPU (eGPU) support that lets developers, VR users gamers and anyone else in need of some extra oomph to plug in a more powerful graphics card via Thunderbolt 3. From a report: While that may not make every underpowered laptop VR ready, it certainly makes staying macOS-only more palatable for some power users. Another notable addition is Business Chat in Messages for users in the US. Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp and others have tweaked their services to enable customer service linkups and now Apple has its version available on the desktop. With it, you can interact with business representatives or even make purchases. Other tweaks include waiting for the user to select login fields before autofilling password information in Safari, a smoke cloud wallpaper that had previously been restricted to the iMac Pro and a Safari shortcut for jumping to the rightmost tab by pressing Command-9. Further reading: Gizmodo.
On 3D forums I frequent sometimes, Mac users have been using external GPUs for ages. What is new here? Or is Bana... I mean Apple merely making support official?
Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
I installed the latest macOS on my MBP this morning, and since, I unable to access my Samba server.
It's still working from a Mini running 10.9.5 and a MBA under 10.11.6.
Anybody else having this problem?
Totof
in those tight enclosures. Good cooling design helps, but it can only do so much. Also Mac users are going to find out that their laptops don't last for decades when they run their CPUs at full bore for 3-4 hour gaming sessions.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I've had an akitio node for the past 6 months or so, paired with an asus 501vw laptop and GTX 970; and the external GPU has worked fantastically.
There's a bit of a performance hit as parent said, but 30% seems a bit high; I think it's largely dependent on your screen resolution and what FPS you're hitting.
At this point if you're shopping for a new gaming computer; it's probably in your interest cost/benefit wise to go with a desktop. BUT, if you have either a spare video card lying around and want a second gaming computer; or if you only want a single computer and need it to be portable -- eGPU's are good compromise.
In related news, Apple also announced the MacBook Ultra Pro, which features no internal GPU or graphics card. As an accessory, users may purchase the GPU dongle with an associated external graphics card for the low, low price of $1499.
Rumors are also swirling about the anticipated MacBook Mega Ultra Pro laptop, which is rumored to feature no screen or keyboard, and handles all I/O through the Touch Bar. Users can purchase optional dongles for attaching a keyboard and screen to the single USB-C port. Users can also purchase a matching keyboard and screen with a special Apple carrying case for just $999.
You're a fucking idiot.
The Apple Tax is a fee paid to Apple, not by them...
APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
From the PCWorld article:
The proprietary cable itself carries data at x4 PCIe Gen 3 data rates. Thatâ(TM)s about 4GB/s. For comparison, a standard GPU connection on a desktop is a full x16 Gen 3 connection, which carries about 16GB/s.
The Thunderbolt 3 connection is good for 40 Gbps, or 5GB/s. The iMac Pro has four USB-C ports that have two separate buses, so theoretically you could even do 10GB/s, I'm not sure how Apple's eGPU box is wired up.
That's of course just the speed from the computer to the card, if you have.a display attached to the card then that does not factor into resolution or monitors supported.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
but Linux tech tips just benchmarked that new iMac pro and even with all it's cooling there was still some throttling. Laptops are always going to be a tradoff in that regard. Maybe if there was a special enclosure that opened the mobo to air...
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Also Mac users are going to find out that their laptops don't last for decades when they run their CPUs at full bore for 3-4 hour gaming sessions.>
A large amount of cooling for games goes into cooling the GPU. So if you are running anything graphic intensive with an eGPU, the system will have a much easier time keeping the processor cool even if you are running it really heavily.
Also more modern Macs have really good cooling design. The iMac Pro hardly ever spins up fans to where you can hear them, only during gaming - and even then not at max.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Apple is not selling one themselves yet to normal consumers, but they did sell a developer unit for $599 (includes Radeon RX 580 card).
Since the kit is just a Sonnet external Thunderbolt 3 box, it seems like it would be a safe bet to get one of those to work with the new release.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I can't imagine why anyone would still use wired headphones. The AirPods are fantastic in their ease of use and setup. And they sound great too. Not missing the jack at all, I will never go back to wires.
It isn't really about portability. Apple has said the next generation Mac Pro moving on from the beautiful cylinder form factor will feature a "modular" design. By adding eGPU support now, we can take advantage of the installed base to beta test GPU over Thunderbolt 3 which is what is going to link the separate components. If there are bugs, people won't complain as loudly about a bonus feature added in an update compared to if they appeared in a newly released flagship machine. Managing expectations. They have some clever people in charge over there.
When Staxx starts making bluetooth headphones, I'll consider it; otherwise you'll find that in pro environments direct connections with instant on, controlled by the board, are the way to go.
---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
Release another full-sized tower. The prices of Mac Pro 5,1s keep going up, Apple. Get the hint already.
---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
I was actually going for Informative, not Troll, as the AC to whom I was replying clearly did not know what rodrigoandrade meant by "Apple Tax". Someone should not have mod points today.
APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
And it was rodrigoandrade who said there was, not me; I was merely explaining what rodrigoandrade was talking about. I do see how you could be confused on that point if you have trouble following conversational flow. Do you have trouble following conversational flow?
APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
I like wireless headphones on my iPhone, but almost never used them with my Mac. Latency (lag) is a real problem for anything that requires audio to be synchronized with the screen. QuickTime solves this for video playback by slightly delaying the start of videos to sync with your headphones, but it only works for simple playback. Good luck trying to edit video when the audio never stays synced.