Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Instagram Suddenly Chokes Off Developers As Facebook Chases Privacy (techcrunch.com)

Posted by BeauHD on from the parental-guidance dept.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Without warning, Instagram has broken many of the unofficial apps built on its platform. This weekend it surprised developers with a massive reduction in how much data they can pull from the Instagram API, shrinking the API limit from 5,000 to 200 calls per user per hour. Apps that help people figure out if their followers follow them back or interact with them, analyze their audiences or find relevant hashtags are now quickly running into their API limits, leading to broken functionality and pissed off users. Two sources confirmed the new limits to TechCrunch, and developers are complaining about the situation on StackOverflow. In a puzzling move, Instagram is refusing to comment on what's happening while its developer rate limits documentation site 404s. All it would confirm is that Instagram has stopped accepting submissions of new apps, just as Facebook announced it would last week following backlash over Cambridge Analytica. Developers tell me they feel left in the dark and angry that the change wasn't scheduled or even officially announced, preventing them from rebuilding their apps to require fewer API calls.

61 comments

  1. Fuckerberg is all about the shekels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is what you get when you build off an closed-ecosystem API. Fuckerberg only cares about his shekels not you measly plebes. #DeleteFacebook #DeleteInstagram #FuckTheZuck

    1. Re:Fuckerberg is all about the shekels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      200 calls per user per hour

      Should be 200 per year. 200 per hour is absurd.

      Apps that help people figure out if their followers follow them back or interact with them, analyze their audiences or find relevant hashtags

      Stupidity at an unprecidented level.

    2. Re:Fuckerberg is all about the shekels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new I.T. closet cleaner overlord.

    3. Re:Fuckerberg is all about the shekels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be 200 per year. 200 per hour is absurd.

      the primary use case for this bullshit is pulling images from individual feeds for display elsewhere
      feeds that are constantly updated
      1 call per feed

      Stupidity at an unprecidented level.

      see above

    4. Re:Fuckerberg is all about the shekels by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      So I guess they're back to spidering and scraping?

      If my browser can see it, I can collect it.

      I'm not 'defending this', but restricting the API just moves the activity back to grey areas. Truth: I have, years ago when I could outrageously overcharge for such simple shit, occasionally made a few bucks scraping data. Mostly companies collecting data on their competitors who made upwise website configuration decisions. Not 'hacking' per se, just 'walking' through an open no password 'login' a couple of hundred thousand times.

      Automating web requests to collect all your contacts and scrape all their walls is pretty trivial.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re: Fuckerberg is all about the shekels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL creimer spam.

    6. Re:Fuckerberg is all about the shekels by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Stupidity at an unprecidented level.

      Unprecedented.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  2. Apple removed instragtam Apple Watch App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wonder how much privacy violations it was pulling. Last thing you want is a Zuckerberg company reading your fucking heart rate too.

    1. Re:Apple removed instragtam Apple Watch App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, Fuckerberg is more into nudes of children.

    2. Re:Apple removed instragtam Apple Watch App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple did not remove the Instagram app from Apple Watch. Instagram had a deadline of April 1st to make their Apple Watch app use WatchKit 2.0. (It was still using 1.0) Instead of rewriting the application Instagram instead just removed the application altogether.

  3. Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The users that game the algorithm to grow a follower count instead of attracting followers organically are pissed off.

    No, sorry, I have to try again, I think I started laughing there.

  4. Sell sell sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Leftists in full self-destruct mode.

    "Trump won!? We have to ruin our platform, burn our cities, and commit suicide!"

    Shit like this is why I voted for Trump. We're living in the best time line.

    1. Re: Sell sell sell by TrumpThemAll · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Funny how the people who were all about "tolerance" are the ones screaming for people to be murdered now and rioting in the streets and attacking innocent civilians. Trumps election did a great thing by exposing these people for the two faced, hateful liars they really are.

    2. Re: Sell sell sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True!

    3. Re: Sell sell sell by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You having fun talking to yourself there pard? Watch out for the scary 'leftists' now..! lol.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  5. Do My Followers Follow Me? by Kunedog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apps that help people figure out if their followers follow them

    Nothing of value of was lost.

    1. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is useful information due to the Follow/Unfollow habit of many follower seeking users. Knowing this info influenced my decision to quit Instagram - its fakeness and competition driven nature left a sour taste in my mouth. I'm a photographer, not a social media hound.

    2. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      For some definitions of "value", but for people who make serious money off Instagram it matters. And those are the people Instagram needs to remain popular and generate revenue.

      Which is all very good news, because it tells us that Instagram must be taking privacy seriously if they are willing to risk some profits over it. We can only hope this is the start of a major shift towards better privacy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Kunedog · · Score: 2

      This is useful information due to the Follow/Unfollow habit of many follower seeking users.

      I don't use IG and I still don't understand. Could you explain this?

    4. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Instagram doesn't directly monetize social influencers -- a lot of the influencer marketing activity that occurs on Instagram is direct between brands and the people themselves. This isn't cutting off their nose to spite their face (and assuredly Facebook will work in that market space to capture some of those dollars) but from Instagram's perspective this isn't a particularly damaging problem revenue-wise.

    5. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      More info here - https://www.coffeewithsummer.com/blogging-social/stop-follow-unfollow/

      Basically it is a slimy tactic to trick users in to following back, "friending back", and once that is done, the original user will unfollow. This results in a +1 follower for them, and over time it makes a person's account look like they're an influencer because they might have 10x more followers than the amount of users they follow. To the untrained, it also has the charm of seeming like validation - when someone with few followers follows YOU it makes you think wow, they're awesome AND they like me! But then they just unfollow you shortly afterwards and the con moves on to the next target.

      There are sites that will do this automatically/programmatically for fee as well.

    6. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Facebook taking privacy seriously? Hahahahahahahahaha. Good joke.

    7. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's quite simple. You sign up for some 'app' and give it your IG login and maybe a bunch of hash tags to monitor. Then it 'follows' every single person who uses one of those hash tags in the hopes that they just follow you back. The thing is the app unfollows everyone one to two days later, playing on the fact you'll probably never unfollow them in return due to forgetfulness.

    8. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some definitions of "value", but for people who make serious money off Instagram it matters.

      Those people need to fuck off and die.

    9. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Followers? Validation ?? Friending ??? What kinda slit-nose gaffot slut care about this shit ?

    10. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahahahaha.... They're protecting their revenue stream, as you said. It has nothing to do with privacy.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    11. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      slit-nose gaffot slut with MONEY (that they were lucky to get together with in the first place).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You don't get it. When facebook sells that data that's just fine, everything operating as designed. When someone else resells the data or even worse, collects it without paying and then sells it, that's bad.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:Do My Followers Follow Me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nuke the entirety of the site from orbit and still, nothing of value would be lost.

      bonus points achieved if facebook is in the blast radius.

  6. And... by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apps that help people figure out if their followers follow them back or interact with them, analyze their audiences or find relevant hashtags are now quickly running into their API limits

    Nothing of value was lost on the platform...

    These are features that Instagram should have been providing already instead of leading to a data broker-friendly situation.

    1. Re:And... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      These are features that Instagram should have been providing already instead of leading to a data broker-friendly situation.

      The data brokers are their customers. That's who they want to be friendly to. They couldn't give two shits about the users, so long as the users keep giving them all of their data for free.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  7. change of terminology required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #s/hashtag/hostages.

  8. Shades of Robin Williams . . . or worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    David Carradine.

  9. Only apps can app apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Modern appy app apps use Appstagram's AppyI, NOT LUDDITE API!

    Apps!

    1. Re:Only apps can app apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mooo?

  10. Here is the limits page on way back machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://web.archive.org/web/20180305181559/https://www.instagram.com/developer/limits/

  11. If you build your business on someone else's API by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you build your business on someone else's API, you're gonna have a bad day (when the API owners figure out how you're making money and decide to make it themselves). That's why "participating in an application marketplace" is usually a suckers bet unless that marketplace is OS wide (like Google Play, iTunes, (does Microsoft have a store up yet?), etc.)

  12. As expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did one actually think it would be possible to limit data leakage without rewriting all the apps that slurped as much as they could because it was simpler that defining their actual needs plus there was always some hope to merchandise data to other entities?

    This is not like cookies where devs had decades to entrench misuse before govs noticed.

    The higher IT penetration is, the higher the stakes get, and the less tolerant law will get about misuses.

  13. Nice Move by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

    Stock price is down 22% in the last week...what can we do to stop it? I know! We'll yank permissions from one of our other properties without warning and people will instantly trust us again. What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Nice Move by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      And the property that most people did not associate with us in the first place, and was pretty much "getting away with it"!
      "Yeah, I closed my FB account, besides, who needs it when we have Instagram!"

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  14. Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apps that app other apps are the appiest apps, and this LUDDITE is too stupid to know that!

    Apps!

    1. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love these!

  15. It's a mad dash to "privacy" by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Facebook is taking it on the chin for that "security breach" by a company working for the Trump campaign and now EVERYBODY is running scared. How nice..

    Why is this? Are we *really* that hopped up on political intrigues that everybody has to position themselves as "unbiased platforms" regardless of the consequences?

    Who in their right mind ever thought that what they posted on any social media platform was "safe" from data mining operations? I know nobody reads the EULA, TOS or even the privacy policy every time it changes, but give me a break. Why are folks all upset now?

    Asking for a friend..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:It's a mad dash to "privacy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      working for the Trump campaign

      This is what amuses me to no end. Suddenly all the journalists care about privacy? No, they don't give a shit about that. This is all just because they have such a hate boner for Trump. When Obama's campaign harvested data off Facebook it was just modern, "groundbreaking" campaigning, nothing to see here.

    2. Re:It's a mad dash to "privacy" by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Why are folks all upset now?
      I guess everyone guesses that there are some "data protection" or "privacy" laws.
      But there are not.

      I mean ... in your fucked up country.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:It's a mad dash to "privacy" by trg83 · · Score: 1

      I think the key word there was 'now'. I know why people should be upset about privacy abuses, and I myself am upset about them, but I think the parent was trying to point out the silliness of caring about privacy situationally based on completely unrelated factors like who is President.

    4. Re:It's a mad dash to "privacy" by bobbied · · Score: 1

      My point really was that if you cared about privacy, DON'T post on social media stuff you wish to keep private. You don't want your data harvested and used for something, don't put it in places you don't absolutely control who gets to see it and use it. (Basically, that means DON'T put anything up there unless you are OK with it being public, because it might just become public and you cannot stop it..)

      Like it or not, privacy policies or even privacy laws are NOT going to keep your stuff private. In fact, all they really do is assign responsibility for the breach of your privacy. In the case of most privacy policies I've read, you get to take your case to arbitration. I suppose privacy laws just give you a government to complain to, who then can fine a company if the law was broken, but that only works if the "company" in question actually does business in your country....

      All this Facebook face saving "Oh we care about your security now!" and the hoards of social media platforms following suit is just a bit late and pretty much a PR exercise. Data breaches happen, people make mistakes, and data will be exposed. We all need to get used to that truth and live our social media lives accordingly.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:It's a mad dash to "privacy" by adosch · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I'm just as taken back as the rest of the sane-minded folk who aren't in shock-and-awe of this quick movement to say we're more secure and less intrusive than the other platform over there. It's simply narrow minded that everything was done in your best interest as an end-user in social media platform situations.

      You can't stop the Big Machine. Heck, you can't even hope to contain it anymore (God bless you, Dan Patrick). This is all just smoke-and-mirrors to save investor stock and dividends, people. As long as you keep using this shit, it only gets worse.

    6. Re:It's a mad dash to "privacy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't think it is unrelated.

      When the government is generally trusted, privacy from it seems less important. When people fear the government, privacy is their first line of defense.

  16. Stop giving them the power. Uninstall them all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop giving them the power. Uninstall them all.

  17. Re:If you build your business on someone else's AP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (does Microsoft have a store up yet?)

    Not sure. I think they were going to call it Dell or HP or something short like they did with Bing to make it easy for folks to remember. Ah, it's Dell. Here's a commercial.

  18. Updated documentation is available by SB5407 · · Score: 1

    Updated documentation is available in another location:
    https://developers.facebook.co...

    This is still a big change without warning though.

  19. Tech blogs will bitch about anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The writer at TechCrunch, of course, knows *exactly* why they did this. And that it makes sense, and is not unreasonable! But they're still going to eek out a story, play both sides, and cry about the poor unofficial app developers. Next week, of course, they'll be writing about how Facebook is evil again.

  20. Surprising... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    Who cares?

    Koolaid went bad. Smart folks are off the app if not entirely off anything Facebook owns.

    Who could ever think they could entrust their privacy - ever, again?

  21. Darth.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pray I don't alter it any further."

  22. It's simple.. by thomn8r · · Score: 1

    If you're so narcissistic that you need to constantly monitor how many followers you have, you need to die in a fire.

  23. oh fucking waaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    waaaaa. fuck social media.

  24. online html5 games play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello ! Our online game site has been updated. New Html5 Games- Flash game-Java game play. www.onlinetrendim.com

  25. So Instagram was as slimy as Facebook by atrimtab · · Score: 1

    So people should now trust Instagram because NOW after Facebook has been found out because Instagram started limited some of the extensive data gathering they've been doing on "users" for years?

    What this tells me is that *ANY* Zuckerberg production is completely untrustworthy with carefully crafted terms of service designed to keep "the product" from running away.

    Cattlemen, like Zuckerberg, are very fond of their herds right up to and particularly after the cattle are sold at market.

    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/...

    --
    Facebook is billions of individual "Skinner Boxes." And if you use it you are the pigeon!