Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Harvest First Vegetables in Antarctic Greenhouse (apnews.com)

Scientists in Antarctica have harvested their first crop of vegetables grown without earth, daylight or pesticides as part of a project designed to help astronauts cultivate fresh food on other planets. From a report: Researchers at Germany's Neumayer Station III say they've picked 3.6 kilograms (8 pounds) of salad greens, 18 cucumbers and 70 radishes grown inside a high-tech greenhouse as temperatures outside dropped below -20 degrees Celsius (-4 Fahrenheit). The German Aerospace Center DLR, which coordinates the project, said Thursday that by May scientists hope to harvest 4-5 kilograms of fruit and vegetables a week.

83 comments

  1. Did they grow iceberg lettuce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fucking penguins got in and destroyed all my beans....

  2. Has been done before. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw a documentary that showed an astronaut growing potatoes in his own crap. So it looks like it is has been done before. Why repeat it on earth all over again?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm rather hoping you were going for the funny mod, but you are aware that 'The Martian' is not a documentary?

    2. Re:Has been done before. by RFjunkie · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. Someplace. Some... verse. Heh.

      --
      Olphart at play. Ruck FepubliKKKans. Welcome to the Worldwide Idiocracy, y'all.
    3. Re:Has been done before. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What? Someone wrote a science fiction story not involving light sabers, extra sensory perception, psychic communications, hyperspace, teleporter, talking computers, sentient robots, space shifting aliens, huge red/orange hydrocarbon explosions in deep space, energy cannons with recoil, space craft doing a banking turns through vacuum ...

      And Hollywood plunked down money and actually made a movie of that thing! You couldda knocked me down with a feather buddy! Who would have thunk it is possible!! No wonder I mistook it for a documentary.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day the Yellowstone erupts again. And that Italian or Indonesian super-volcano. And then that asteroid will hit us. And then we launch all the nukes at once. We survive underground, where there is still warm.

    5. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he is a conspiracy theorist, in that The Martian was made to look like an actual failed Mars expedition. When he saw the 'deleted scenes' portion of said flick, he had his suspicions confirmed.

    6. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically energy cannons would have recoil, just not nearly as much as the movies show. If the energy was delivered in laser form for example, the light pressure would cause a small but measurable recoil in the opposite direction.

    7. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checkmate atheists.

    8. Re: Has been done before. by fezzzz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Antartcica is one of the least disturbed places on earth with an immense magnifying glass of the impact we humans have on the continent. I overwintered in 2006 and 2007 on SANAE base in teams 45 and 46. Everything that goes in, must come back and the risks of contamination, even though remote, prohibited any growing of anything. No chicken bones were part of the food due to the risk of chicken flu for the bird colonies. Regardless of the laws, in a team of 9 members, with no access to the outside world, the team actually decides on the laws for the year. We may or may not have grown something to smoke, made a braai in the kitchen or used the fire extinguishers to fizz our drinks.

    9. Re: Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure your fraternity trip was sponsored by tax dollars

    10. Re:Has been done before. by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Well, technically energy cannons would have recoil, just not nearly as much as the movies show. If the energy was delivered in laser form for example, the light pressure would cause a small but measurable recoil in the opposite direction [aps.org].

      Checkmate atheists.

      Indeed, the proof is undeniable.

      Light has mass and exhibits Newtonian properties therefor God is real because He is Light.

      [mic-drop]

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    11. Re: Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't cook the potato enough.

    12. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professor Gunström was growing pineapples on glaciers back in the 80s. But the formula must never be known or it would cause World War III.

    13. Re: Has been done before. by fezzzz · · Score: 1

      Taxed Rands to be more exact, but your point is valid. Most scientific research are government sponsered due to the perceived low odds of returns. We mostly focused on maintaining equipment, studying ionospheric research. Riometers (wide band radio receivers in 200Mhz range) directional and wide band, magnetometers, radar, aurora cameras. My most important project was maintaining ion detectors to measure cosmic rays. The count is higher with a more perpendicular magnetic fields. Besides daily checks and side projects, there's much free time to fratenize if all equipment runs as designed. In my first year, our main water pipe burst on about 100 places due to low temperature water, freezing. We spent a few weeks carrying 6m, 100mm pipes, removing insulation, welding gaps closed, adding new heating tape and reinstalling the pipes.

    14. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically energy cannons would have recoil, just not nearly as much as the movies show. If the energy was delivered in laser form for example, the light pressure would cause a small but measurable recoil in the opposite direction.

      If referring to the (somewhat inappropriately named) turbo lasers in Star Wars, they appear to be some sort of plasma projecting weapons. Definitely are not lasers.

    15. Re:Has been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you'd bank the turns for the sake of the pilot (sideways g's suck).

  3. Rocket Science by bigwheel · · Score: 1

    Grow lights have been around for a while.

    We used to grow bean sprouts while on long canoe trips. Sprouts are easy to grow, don't take up much space, taste good, and fairly nutritious.

    1. Re:Rocket Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but sprouts only grow so big... and aren't exactly self replenishing!

    2. Re:Rocket Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Grow lights have been around for a while.

      Yeah, but really ...

      by May scientists hope to harvest 4-5 kilograms of fruit and vegetables a week

      Could you do that?

      For all y'all still using cubits and hogsheads, that's around 10 pounds of vegetables a week ... and I'd bet the astronauts would be awfully happy to have that much fresh produce every week.

      It's easy to be dismissive until you stop to realize the scale and everything else they're talking about here.

    3. Re:Rocket Science by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but hydroponically grown vegetables in Antartica have been grown for quite a while as well:

      http://www.spaceref.com/news/v...

      Date on the article: 2004

      Come on Slashdot. I know this isn't a breaking news site but ....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Rocket Science by bigwheel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      " by May scientists hope to harvest 4-5 kilograms of fruit and vegetables a week

      Could you do that?"

      Yes. I grew up on a small farm that produced several truckloads of vegetables every week. And yes, we started them under grow lights and greenhouses while there was snow on the ground. My father did this with only an 8th grade education.

      Given enough space, heat, and lighting, 10 pounds of vegetables isn't very much. Looking at TFA, the scientist didn't look like he was working in a crammed environment, compared to any other greenhouse. Forgive me for being dismissive, but it's been done before.

    5. Re:Rocket Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given enough space

      And we have a winner.

      How much space do you need?

    6. Re:Rocket Science by bigwheel · · Score: 2

      "How much space do you need?"

      Look at the picture in TFA. Take the amount of space in the photo, and divide that by the number of plants you see. If you do this carefully, you will notice that the room is quite spacious, compared to most greenhouses.

      If TFA showed how the scientist created technology that can grow lots of vegetables in a tiny area, it might be impressive. But based on the article and photo provided, the scientist achieved about as much as a kid in a 4-H project.

    7. Re:Rocket Science by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      How much space do you need?

      It doesn't really matter, since space is infinite.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re:Rocket Science by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that what has happened here is that a fluff piece was written about a greenhouse that is performing actual science, but the science part was lost as it went over the head of the reporter.

      It looks like they're testing various aeroponic setups, and might even be testing different strains of various plants.

      Plus, while we know how to do it, they may be going for more exact numbers. How many days and hours? How much artificial light? What temperature? How much water? Etc...

      The fact that it gives the scientists and workers down there fresh produce is a bonus.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    9. Re:Rocket Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they also did it without soil and a closed water cycle.

      I think you are missing the whole point of why it is hard to grow things in space.

    10. Re:Rocket Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you also grow them without earth? TFA says without earth, sunlight or pesticides.

      If you used your farm's fertile processed soil to do this, then no you can't claim you did what they did. Still claim it's been done before?

    11. Re:Rocket Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't speak for the OP, but I've got a quarter acre suburban lot outside of minneapolis st. paul... (45th parallel).

      I keep a fairly large vegetable garden (17'x24') and have a fair amount of edible landscaping (perennials like blueberries, apples, cherries, high bush cranberries, honey berries, strawberries (which aren't technically perennials, but we let them send out runners so the patch is effectively perennial...), raspberries, etc.) around what is mostly a grass yard in the back (and about half grass in the front) along with my house and garage and driveway on the same property...

      We've done more than 1,000lbs of produce a year, with no grow lights... in a place that right now in april has several inches of snow on the ground (a few feet in my yard, where the snow is both piled from the driveway, and shaded by the house) and the growing season is going to end in by November for the most hardy of annuals. 6-7 months is the most we get to keep plants in the ground.
      So 10 pounds of produce a week, on average would be 520 lbs a year... I've doubled that on less than a quarter acre even up in hardiness zone 4, no green house, no lights, and a bit of fertilizer (mostly compost from the yard and kitchen though)... heck I read about some one on a smaller lot in st. paul pushing for a ton (2,000lbs) of food (we'll probably hit a ton once the apple and cherry trees are mature, and honestly we probably could have hit that already with a bit more care around some of the plants... but it's just me and my wife, and we both work full time... so the garden gets as much attention and energy as we have left over...)

      Growing that much food, isn't a challenge, the plants mostly produce the food on their own, people just need to be there to pick it and keep pest/weeds away from choking them out... in a controlled ideal environment with no pests, and no weeds a full quarter acer (roughly 100x100ft) could easily be producing WAY more than that. (less than 100x100 given that they have shelves to utilize vertical space in the photo.)

  4. Excellent News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that we can finally grow food on the Antarctic plate surrounding our world, we can finally use it as a "jumping off" point to discover what's really underneath our planet.

    Flat earthers unite! Down with the round!

    1. Re:Excellent News by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      This is the real story.

  5. How did they pick the vegetables? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0
    I thought Americans have lost the digital technology to pick vegetables from plants. I understand we now depend totally on the Mexican migrant digital workers for this essential production. How come these guys did it?

    Looks like it is a German operation. So may be they still have the technology, or they took some Turkish immigrants with them or may be some Syrian refugee.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:How did they pick the vegetables? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      They're getting paid a whole lot, so they'll do just about anything.

  6. Salad Greens? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    I would expect they would try to grow more calorie per kilogram vegetables then Salad Greens. Sure in industrialized areas, Salad Greens are nice for fillers, because we have no food shortages, so we like the crunch and the fact it will fill us up without extra caloric intake. But in Antarctica, I would put more effort into growing foods that will better sustain the people there, because getting food delivered is expensive and hazardous.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Salad Greens? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder how many calories of food they got per calorie used to generate the electricty. Neumayer-Station III Power generation: Three 75 kW Diesel generators — 150 kW maximum, 105 kW average output. Good luck using diesel generators on Mars.

    2. Re:Salad Greens? by Comboman · · Score: 1

      If I had a high-tech indoor grow-op on a lawless continent thousands of miles from the nearest police, I would definitely not use it for salad greens.

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    3. Re:Salad Greens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one thing they are delicious. For another, the folks in Antarctica get their food only by delivery twice a year. Anything fresh gets eaten in the first few weeks. Imagine going 5 months with only dehydrated, canned or frozen food.

      I imagine the workers at that site couldn't care less about the scientific or political reasons to grow them - they just want fresh veggies!

    4. Re:Salad Greens? by Headw1nd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Calories are usually not the issue overall, as high-caloric foods tend to be easy to transport and store. The issue is more nutrient-rich foods and the bulk items needed for healthy digestion.

    5. Re:Salad Greens? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah!

      You're talking about green peppers, right?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  7. Impress me? by RFjunkie · · Score: 1

    When they're regularly growin' maters and taters, I'm in. Heh.

    --
    Olphart at play. Ruck FepubliKKKans. Welcome to the Worldwide Idiocracy, y'all.
  8. Where? What? by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the linked-to AP article is mostly just a picture, with nothing on the tech., here you go:

    https://phys.org/news/2018-04-...

    http://www.dlr.de/dlr/en/deskt...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Pretty cool, but maybe not space & cost effective on a spaceship.

    1. Re:Where? What? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Radish greens are edible. I wonder if they ate them.

    2. Re:Where? What? by Headw1nd · · Score: 2

      I think part of what they're working on is optimizing yield against space and weight of materials, since these are also concerns in Antarctica. I also imagine fresh vegetables would be a premium item down there, especially in winter.

    3. Re:Where? What? by agmsmith · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the links. I was wondering what their power source is, and the Wikipedia article has the answer. Apparently they're turning diesel fuel and a bit of wind into plant growth.

  9. Wow... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Plants grown indoors... under artificial lighting... here on Earth?!

    Color me impressed.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget - 'without pesticides'. Its like every aspect of what they're doing is bleeding edge innovation.
      Except the part where basically none of it is ...

    2. Re:Wow... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The "without pesticides" bit sounds especially challenging in Antarctica or some distant planet similarly hostile towards terrestrial life.

  10. Re:OMG Global Warming! by substance2003 · · Score: 0

    Those pro-Trump denialists claiming you need a greenhouse to grow vegetables in Anatarctica when we all know there's RECORD HEAT down there.

    I'll only let them live if they install a weather monitoring station inside the greenhouse and then give the temperature measurements a +5C adjustment in the name of TRUTH.

    I didn't even read TFA and even I knew it was for the purpose of growing food outside of earth but you had to make it into a political global warming, Trump bashing agenda.
    I hope you're proud of your inability to take the time to read.

  11. Marketing opportunity by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    They ought to be able to get a huge price premium for rare Antarctic produce.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Marketing opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a fad in Japan almost two decades back where they were selling bottled water, but the water was from ice frozen for ages underneath the frozen Arctic surface. It was water that had never seen the light of day, until it was drilled out from under, and processed for packaging, etc. It became a thing around the time that Los Angeles decided to market oxygen in certain spots when the LA smog became a semi-permanent feature of the cityscape. A few years later, the state decided to give up mandatory emissions testing for cars.

  12. Food from air! by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    The incredibly sparse linked story was devoid of any relevant details. Apparently the plants take root in the air and spontaneously grow edible plant matter from a combination of nothing and nothing.

    Also, why the effing hell would pesticides even need to be mentioned. In a sterile environment designed to replicate a space station or a habitable fabrication on another planet where the FUCKING FUCKITY FUCK FUCK would the insects come from?!?!? It's like the person who wrote this article was an intern at Monsanto and thinks that pesticides are a required nutrient or something.

    Worst article ever. No revealing information on innovation, methods, or novelty. We are somehow stupider for having read it. I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul.

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    1. Re:Food from air! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's part of the dumbing down process. Ever read a newspaper from the 60's? You practically need a modern phd.

    2. Re:Food from air! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Informative

      The term "pesticides" also includes herbicides and fungicides.

      If your life depends on successfully growing a monoculture over several years in a sealed tin can, you might need to at least consider having some fungicides on hand. Not to mention, some mites are almost microscopic. Without any natural predators, one pair slipping through might also ruin your day.

    3. Re:Food from air! by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Thank you Waffle Iron! You provided more novel information than the linked "news" article and you spurred me to learn something new today. Oddly, I had never rigorously defined "pesticide." When you stated it included herbicides and fungicides it instantly made sense, but in a surprising way that let me know I was missing something. So I looked it up. Surprise and joy ensued, again thank you! Repellents are included, as are microbial agents. I had no idea I was washing my hands with pesticide, haha!

      From the Wikipedia:
      The term pesticide includes all of the following: herbicide, insecticides (which may include insect growth regulators, termiticides, etc.) nematicide, molluscicide, piscicide, avicide, rodenticide, bactericide, insect repellent, animal repellent, antimicrobial, fungicide, disinfectant (antimicrobial), and sanitizer.

      I assume when the article says the plants grow without earth there is some kind of nutrient resupply, possibly from human waste. I'm not sure because the FUCKING ARTICLE HAS NO FUCKING DETAILS...ahem, sorry for that outburst. Creating a sustainable, sealed, food producing system without any sanitization, disinfectants, or fungicide is really amazing.

      If only there were some kind of news article we could read about it...

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    4. Re:Food from air! by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Also, why the effing hell would pesticides even need to be mentioned

      Haven't RTFA, but I've grown stuff in Antarctica, and in McMurdo they've been growing lots of stuff for a long time and they regularly have problems with the Tobacco mosaic virus as it can be carried by people for a long time.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  13. Re:OMG Global Warming! by Train0987 · · Score: 2

    Thank you comrade! Your secret mission to make Democrats look even dumber has been a huge success!

  14. 5kg tomato by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    is 900 kcalories

  15. more info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA sucks, here is a little more info on their setup (de/en): http://www.dlr.de/dlr/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-10081/151_read-26129/#/gallery/29773

  16. Space Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sweet, just a few years away from some dank space weed.

  17. Antarctic? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

    Researchers at Germany's Neumayer Station III say they've picked 3.6 kilograms (8 pounds) of salad greens, 18 cucumbers and 70 radishes grown inside a high-tech greenhouse as temperatures outside dropped below -20 degrees celsius.

    Only -20C? They should try their experiment in Canada, where we have real winters, eh?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Antarctic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only -20C?

      I guess the summer is staring to turn into autumn down there.

  18. Delicious by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I bet the veggies taste better than the ones from all those Arctic greenhouses in Alaska.
    After all this is the deep South.

  19. Sprouts by sjbe · · Score: 1

    We used to grow bean sprouts while on long canoe trips. Sprouts are easy to grow, don't take up much space, taste good, and fairly nutritious.

    I'm with you except for the "taste good" part. They're palatable but never once in my life have I ever craved a sprout or thought that they had a great taste. Nice bit of crunch and can add a little fresh but they have less taste than celery and are extremely bland.

    1. Re:Sprouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have the palette and mind of a fool.

    2. Re:Sprouts by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      they have less taste than celery and are extremely bland

      Celery is too spicy for me, I prefer to eat ice cubes.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Sprouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The palette? Is he painting?

      Be that as it may, I'm sure his palate is quite discriminating.

    4. Re: Sprouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he has the palate of a normal human. Sprouts are fine to eat, but still they don't "taste good". It's like eating kale, it's rather boring on its own.

  20. Without pestacides is a cloyingly idiotic stance. If any insects get free on an alien planet, fully exterminsting them as quickly as possible is the name of the game.

    There is no environmentalist issue here. They need to bring pestacides (i.e. budget for it in transition) just in case. Maybe not much, and something that can be powderized and is safe in a contained space, but they need it.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Pesto by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      You are the one making an idiotic stance. We are not going to "an alien planet" with our space program. We are only going to have space stations and possibly humans on utterly barren worlds and asteroids in our solar system. There are no known habitable worlds in the universe but Earth thus far. The Kepler planets are merely candidates that could prove uninhabitable for a myriad of reasons, and we won't reach those in the next two centuries.

  21. Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where will the water come from on the other planets? I don't believe it would be wise to take it from the Earth.

  22. You've Not Enjoyed Cucumbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until you've eaten an Antarctic cucumber. The level of crunch is off the charts!

    But the lettuce is awful, just like soggy frozen cardboard.

  23. Perhaps they should contract marijuana growers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Marijuana dgrowers perfected growing things indoors long ago. Maybe they should hire some? Really though I don't see what's so special about this. We already know you can grow plants indoors. They mention the temperature outside as if that makes a difference growing indoors. I would expect a research station in Antarctica to be able to withstand the weather. And you don't need to use pesticides when growing in a sterile environment. Why is this news?

  24. Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientists in Antarctica have harvested their first crop of vegetables grown without earth, daylight or pesticides

    "High tech" greenhouse? They discovered grow lights and hydroponics.

  25. Our Antarctic veggies will rule the markets! by ffkom · · Score: 1

    Now we only need to burn some more coal to speed up climate change, and soon those dried-up, sun-burnt deserts will crave for our Antarctic veggies, sold at premium prices!

  26. The South Pole Station has a hydroponic greenhouse by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

    The Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station has a nice greenhouse in which fresh food has been grown for ten years or so. I was there a few months back, and ate some of their greens. Yummy! This experiment must be a bit more exotic, otherwise it wouldn't be newsworthy.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
  27. bah, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can hook ya up with a few dozen OG dope growers who did this sort of "covert agriculture" playing around with hydro gear and gel based soils since the early 90's. :)

  28. Iceberg lettuce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIMSHOT! I'll be hear all winter, folks. Try the roast penguin!

  29. Re:OMG Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off ivan

  30. improvements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can add a few extra vertical rows of half-shadow plants (raddishes, lettuces, cabbages, broccoli, ...)
    if you displace some of the heliospectra LED's with low light lights which do have a big spread (CFLs, Neon ...).

  31. Soylent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was really interesting work by the Soylent corporation. Apparently it's an element of their new program to commercially harvest oceanic plankton.

  32. Big in Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Scientists Harvest First Vegetables in Antarctic Greenhouse

    As usual, the japs are moe advanced, they are already growing high-school girls in Antarctica!

    No kidding, as Sora Yori Mo Tooi Basho (A place further than the Universe), an anime series about a quartet of high-school girls going to the southernmost continent onboard an icebreaker and spending a 3-month summer shift there, suprisingly became the most popular title of this winter season.
    (Similarly, the second most popular anime was Yuru Camp, concerning a bunch of middle-school girls going camping around Mt. Fuji in the autumn-winter season. In contrast, all kinds of over-hyped harem, idol, historic military fantasy and e-gaming anime franchies fell flat on their faces with minuscule viewership.)

  33. Missing the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything in Antarctica is expensive and hazardous!

    Also, residents of these bases are going to continue getting food delivered from away, essentially forever. And that food will be tasty and nutritious. However it is lacking something critical.

    Freshness. Vegetables. Salads. These are a key part of a diet and good cooking. Also, food is absolutely central to the morale of any crew on a remote posting; few things will cause a riot faster than bad food when people are isolated. Even 'merely adequate' turns out to be inadequate in such conditions.

    Yes, you can get fresh veggies delivered. They last a week if you are lucky. There is no practical way of getting fresh groceries delivered continuously, and often your fragile greens are already wilting by the time they are delivered.