How Will Automation Affect Different US Cities? (northwestern.edu)

Casino dealers and fishermen are both likely to be replaced by machines in coming years. So which city will lose more of its human workforce -- Las Vegas, the country's gambling capital, or Boston, a major fishing hub? From a research: People tend to assume that automation will affect every locale in the same, homogeneous way, says Hyejin Youn, an assistant professor of management and organization at Kellogg. "They have never thought of how this is unequally distributed across cities, across regions in the U.S." It is a high-stakes question. The knowledge that certain places will lose more jobs could allow workers and industries to better prepare for the change and could help city leaders ensure their local economies are poised to rebound. In new research, Youn and colleagues seek to understand how machines will disrupt the economies of individual cities. By carefully analyzing the workforces of American metropolitan areas, the team calculated what portion of jobs in each area is likely to be automated in coming decades. You can run your city's name, and also the job position you're curious about here.

Comments

Something is seriously wrong

[rsilvergun]

Based on this finding, Youn says small cities could see an exodus of workers, as well as exacerbated income inequality, since robots are likely to hollow out the middle class there.

Something is seriously wrong with our civilization when robots taking over dull, repetitive tasks leads to an overall worse quality of life.

Re:Something is seriously wrong

[thinkwaitfast]

I make less than $20k/year, yet am extremely wealthy by 1900's standards, probably 1980's standards by most measures.

Re:Something is seriously wrong

[thinkwaitfast]

Inflation adjusted, a 26" color tv would have cost me 21% of my income in 1980. In 2018, a 32" flat panel tv costs me 0.9% of my income.

In 1972 (because I couldn't find 1980 prices), a refrigerator would have cost me 21% of my income, while today it costs 3.7% of my income while using 1/3rd the amount of energy. And the $ ammounts do not include the intangible increases in quality (better for the environment, safer, less energy useage).

Re:Something is seriously wrong

[DNS-and-BIND]

People of below average intelligence - you know, 50% of the population - have no problem with dull, repetitive tasks. In fact, they find learning new things to be a difficult chore. It is only the intelligent people who delight in learning. Because they're good at it, duh. How does an intelligent person overlook such obvious facts?

If you don't have a job, you don't have a place in society. You're not contributing. This is very destructive to the human soul, and people will start killing themselves because they don't know why they're alive. It's not like instead of a job people are going to start going to see independent films and creating art all day. That's just what a very small segment of the intelligent population - the ones high in creativity and trait openness - wishes they could do. They don't speak for humanity, this is painfully obvious to any observer.