Some Android Device Makers Are Lying About Security Patch Updates (phonedog.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: Security patches for smartphones are extremely important because many people store personal data on their devices. Lots of Android phones out there get regularly security patches, but according to a new report, some of them are lying about the patches that they've actually gotten. According to a study by Security Research Labs, some Android phones are missing patches that they claim to have. Wired explains that SRL tested 1,200 phones from more than a dozen phone makers for every Android security patch released in 2017. The devices tested include ones from Google, Samsung, Motorola, LG, HTC, Xiaomi, OnePlus, Nokia, TCL, and ZTE. The study found that outside of Google and its Pixel phones, well-known phone makers had devices that were missing patches that they claimed to have. "We found several vendors that didn't install a single patch but changed the patch date forward by several months," says SRL founder Karsten Nohl.
Boardroom banter: Why should we provide free updates, when we can sell them a new phone...
Is anybody even remotely surprised?
One of the huge problems with Android is it is now so fragmented, and every vendor has filled it with their own custom shit and they've done god knows what to the core of it.
As soon as it's shipped, they move on to the next product. They have neither the time, resources, nor inclination to maintain older versions of phones -- because they want you to buy a new one.
The reality is, there are as many versions of Android as there are phones and companies who make them. And companies aren't going to spend the resources on a shipped product, because they've been paid for it already.
So, yeah, they don't to updates, don't plan to do updates, and refuse to admit that it was abandonware before you even got your hands on it.
To me, this is the greatest failing of Android.
Plenty of the blame goes on carriers. If you have the new hotness, expect fairly regular updates. If not, good luck. Planned obsolescence is a load of crap perpetrated by carriers and manufacturers. I'd actually put more of the blame on carriers now that you pay full price + interest for phones in the US.
IANAL but this sure sounds an awful lot like fraud. They claim to be providing a service but don't actually provide it? The FTC should come down like a load of bricks on these companies.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.