Slashdot Mirror


Telegram is Riddled With Tens of Thousands of Piracy Channels; Apple and Google Have Ignored Requests From Creators To Take Action (theoutline.com)

joshtops writes: Instant messaging platform Telegram, which is used by more than 200 million users, has had an open secret since its inception: The platform has served as a haven for online pirates. The Outline reports that the platform is riddled with thousands of groups and channels, many with more than 100,000 members, whose sole purpose of existence is to share illegally copied movies, music albums, apps, and other content. The files are stored directly to Telegram's servers, allowing users to download movies, songs, and other content with one click. Channel admins told The Outline that they have not come across any resistance from Telegram despite the company, along with Apple and Google, maintaining a 'zero tolerance' stance on copyright infringement. This permissiveness on Telegram's part has led to the proliferation of a cottage industry of piracy marketplaces on the service.

[...] The Outline also discovered several groups and channels on Telegram in which stolen credentials -- i.e., the username and password for a website -- from Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, HBO, CBS, EA Sports, Lynda, Sling, WWE Network, Mega, India's Hotstar, and dozens of other services were being offered to tens of thousands of members each day. The Outline sourced nearly three-dozen free credentials from six Telegram channels, all of which worked as advertised.
The report says that content creators have reached out to Apple, requesting the iPhone-maker to intervene, but the company has largely ignored the issue.

In an unrelated development, a Moscow court cleared the way on Friday for the local government to ban Telegram, the messaging app, over its failure to give Russian security services the ability to read users' encrypted messages.

49 comments

  1. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Outline has confirmed their participation in identity theft by stating they sourced and used credentials that "worked".

  2. OMG, piracy on the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I find that extremely hard to believe.
    All these decades, other than a very short period before the piratebay was blocked, there has been absolutely 0 piracy.
    IRC, usenet, and various other online services were never used by people in such nefarious ways.

    1. Re:OMG, piracy on the internet? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      xdcc send

  3. Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly? by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple and Google have no investment in Telegram, why should they be expected to solve this problem? You can use Safari and Chrome to download pirated stuff on your phone too, but I don't see anybody calling for Apple and Google to remove Safari and Chrome from telephones.

    If creators have a beef with Telegram, take it up with Telegram Messenger LLP.

  4. I am confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they heck do you want Apple or Google to do?

    That would be like minority users abuse Yahoo / Microsoft messenger and expect Google / Apple to do something.

  5. Good little shill by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
    Well, it's certainly nice to see journalists standing up to little people and defending the intellectual property rights of the entertainment industry! Speak truth to the powerless! Let's see who this "The Outline" is:

    The Outline is a new kind of publication for a new kind of human. We made this thing because we believe that the right story told in the right way can change someone's life. But telling the right stories for right now - and telling them in a way that's meaningful and modern - isn't going to happen by itself. We have to make it happen.

    Our foundational reason for building The Outline is that we're really excited about putting something into the world that wasn't there before. Our coverage focuses on three topics that are increasingly converging in strange and important ways: power (who has it, who wants it, and what do they do when they get it?), culture (the way we live and communicate), and the future (where weâ(TM)re going next).

    So, they tell themselves the comforting lie that they're edgy and on the side of the people...while cozying up to evil megacorporations. It's doublethink, the ability to hold two mutually contradictory thoughts at the same time without experiencing crippling cognitive dissonance. This talent is distressingly common among the chattering classes today. :( It used to be something rare and special, but now we see it all the time from publications that are supposed to know better.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Good little shill by Entrope · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where do they claim they're on the side of the people? Their whole statement is essentially longhand for "we do propaganda".

    2. Re:Good little shill by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Look at their front page, it's all LGBTWTFOMGBBQ and Big Coal and Trump bashing. You could fill a "Progressive Bingo" card just by paging down a few times. Of course their internal narrative is they're the good guys fighting the power, man.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Good little shill by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You've obviously fallen for their propaganda then.

  6. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't even understand how this became a slashdot post.

  7. Oh my! by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't believe it! News for nerds! Stuff that matters!
    Something we didn't already read in our grandpa's paper newspaper*.
    (* kids, that's like a large papery blog)

    Thanks for the tips guys, downloading now...

    1. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never had a use for Telegram, but yeah, it finally makes a compelling argument.

  8. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by dslauson · · Score: 2

    Apple and Google have no investment in Telegram, why should they be expected to solve this problem?

    Apple and Google, through their walled-garden app stores, have set themselves up as curators of content, and they regularly enforce things like this. They've brought that expectation upon themselves.

    You can use Safari and Chrome to download pirated stuff on your phone too, but I don't see anybody calling for Apple and Google to remove Safari and Chrome from telephones.

    Telegram is apparently hosting this infringing content on their own servers, which makes this much different. Obviously Telegram owns more culpability than Google/Apple here, but Google and Apple are acting against policies that they have set. Not sure how vulnerable that leaves them legally, though.

  9. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "Apple and Google have no investment in Telegram, why should they be expected to solve this problem?"

    They could also call the CEO of the Internets and ask him to kill that new email thingie, where users send each other all sorts of ungodly files and links.

  10. Re: Apple & Google are responsible how, exactl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the final sentence. Muh Russia.

    And how is Russia shutting down telegram access for illegal activity and failing to hand over the keys UNRELATED to an article about huge problems in illegal use of telegrams services? Are you really that stupid Josh? Can you not even read the content of articles that you publish?

  11. Re: Apple & Google are responsible how, exactl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google doesn't have a walled garden app store.
    Google devices aren't forced to use their app store, and you don't need a Google device to use it.

  12. If you can't beat them, beat them some more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Telegram is Riddled With Tens of Thousands of Piracy Channels; Apple and Google Have Ignored Requests From Creators To Take Action

    Fortunately in solidarity with the pirates Slashdot will have a link-a-thon, promoting whack-a-mole, and middle-finger as forms of expression.

  13. An entry from the FAQ by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Q: There's illegal content on Telegram. How do I take it down?

    All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them.

  14. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple and Google, through their walled-garden app stores, have set themselves up as curators of content, and they regularly enforce things like this. They've brought that expectation upon themselves.

    Except Telegram isn't doing anything to break the TOS of either Apple or Google ... Telegram facilitates messages between people, but not all of Telegram is illegal content, and neither Apple nor Google have any way of knowing this is true, or which stuff is pirated.

    Obviously Telegram owns more culpability than Google/Apple here, but Google and Apple are acting against policies that they have set.

    I bet there is no such policy which says they will block apps which abide by the TOS, but otherwise theoretically allow you to share infringing content ... because, again, neither Apple nor Google have any way of knowing that is happening, and neither have visibility into individual messages, and neither of them are storing or making available this stuff.

    What you're suggesting is absurd. Short of saying "well, this could hypothetically be used to do something illegal so we'll block the whole thing", this has nothing to do with Apple or Google. Every app that allows people to communicate might be used to infringe content, that doesn't mean you block every app.

    This is entirely between the content owners and Telegram.

    Should you be arrested because you might commit a crime? That's what you're describing.

    Twitter could be used to share pirated content between users, are you stupid enough to think Apple and Google should both drop Twitter too?

  15. OMG, geeks on the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost as outrageous a claim as geek s getting laid.

    1. Re:OMG, geeks on the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost as outrageous a claim as geek s getting laid.

      It's nerds who don't get laid. They're too busy playing Dungeons & Dragons or Magic: The Gathering and arguing over rules to escape from their inability to better themselves. Geeks have an intense interest in subject(s) plus the drive and work ethic to invest in it, learn all about it, and hone their skills. These are things employers like. Geeks are often respected experts in their fields. They know how to prosper and be good providers for a family. These are traits women tend to appreciate.

      There are many kinds of geeks. They're not all computer geeks. For example, there are martial arts geeks. They go beyond training (which is plenty challenging on its own - try it) and really seek to understand the physics and body mechanics of their art(s). There are math, engineering, literature, and music geeks. There are even bodybuilding geeks.

      A geek is someone who has at least two things: 1) an intense interest, love, and fascination for a thing that is not easily mastered, and 2) the drive to do the work and acquire the skill to achieve mastery, well beyond the minimum competency that others acquire just to satisfy a boss.

      Real women are worth the effort it takes to maintain a healthy relationship. I find they tend to appreciate and respect these qualities immensely. Getting laid is no problem there. Now, if you're just banging hapless sluts, well yes I wouldn't expect them to understand. Neither do you.

    2. Re:OMG, geeks on the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about dorks and dweebs?

  16. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by higuita · · Score: 1

    Simple, this is a easy way to tell people that they should use telegram to find pirate content... and so secure that not even russia can break it!! :D

    --
    Higuita
  17. iForgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who again makes the iPhone??

    "reached out to Apple, requesting the iPhone-maker to intervene"

    Thanks for reminding us who makes iPhones, since we all here forgot.

  18. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    Maybe there were a few readers here who didn't already know a good source for pirated music, movies, etc.

  19. "Riddled" ... Keep swallowing the Content Mafia ko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, the world does not givr a singe fuck about your criminal schemes of stealing money from people without working for it by employing an artificial (and imaginary, as you can see) scarcity monopoly (that's two crimes already, in every other business) on an infinitely abundant something that isn't even a resource (but merely a pattern in a medium).

    I should make copies of my $100 bills and demand that the Content Mafia cokeheads do real actual work for that fake money, or else be sued of "stealing" my "monetary property" (fake money) and be called "pirates" and "thieves" and go o prison for 10 years!

  20. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by fazig · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure what they are supposed to do about that, since Google is also hosting tons of copyright infringing material on their own google drive. Because you know, you can't really control what kind of encrypted files people upload there and then share the links and passwords with others through any means. I'm not sure how the Apple cloud works, since I've never used it.

    So what can be done here? Decrypt and scan all files? Not feasible because it takes too long and costs too much. Ban encryption? Theoretically an option, but do we really want something like this to happen? This list is certainly not exhaustive. If someone finds more ideas, maybe some that make sense, please add them.

  21. Creators requests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrible headline and dubious article.

    Why would creators request that stream service credentials stop being shared on telegram?

    Why not sue the ISPs as well for allowing traffic to Telegram. Oh wait...

  22. Re: Apple & Google are responsible how, exactl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's PR bullshit distractions from the Facebook bot army.

  23. In other news... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Voice messaging platforms AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile, which are used by more than 300 Million users, has had an open secret since its inception: The platform has served as a haven for online criminals. The Outline reports that the platform is riddled with thousands of groups and channels, whose sole purpose of existence is to commit illegal acts.

    Clearly we must get rid of this menace!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  24. To all the Telegram shills: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOSCOW BANNED IT!

    Why you need any further evidence as to the misdeeds and evil intent of Telegram is beyond me.

  25. Only one relevant question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Telegram invincible from takedown via a distributed service of some kind, or are they just like everybody else with all the eggs in one basket? We need a safe haven from ALL censorship, something that is indelible.

  26. Is communication bad? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, Telegram is .. general-purpose? This is like worrying about the fact that Harry Mudd uses the same kind of spaceship fuel as the rest of us. Your problem is with Harry Mudd, not the spaceship fuel. If you make it about the spaceship fuel, you're going to become the enemy of many space captains.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Is communication bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is communication bad?

      Where have you been? Communication has always been "bad" when $interest_group disagrees with its content. Any time there's a forum where "bad" communication might occur without oversight, $interest_group[] gets involved to shut it down. This is the world we live in.

  27. OMG! People are sharing files / video / music! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    /sarcasm I'm shocked, shocked, I tell you that people are sharing files / video / music on the internet! Back in MY day we hoarded our one's and zero's! Only communists shared their data with a stranger. We practiced safe hex by being our corporate master's bitch!

    Instead of asking the question: "When this many people are just outright ignoring copyright maybe this civil disobediance of Against Intellectual Property (written by a lawyer, go figure) is a call to re-think the archaic, capitalist concept of Copyright? Nah, let's go after Apple and Google instead which have NOTHING to do with this. "

    Wait till these people find out that you can share "illegal numbers" through Skype, Google Drive, or even email !

    1. Re:OMG! People are sharing files / video / music! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wait! I'm fighting the good fight against the left-wing oligarchy by pirating Hollywood movies.

      I'm going to bleed Hollywood dry, one movie at a time.

  28. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    Accept the fact that copyright infringement will always exist; and it's extremely stupid and naive for content producers to believe they can stamp it out without the effects being felt in disproportionate fashion by every-day people who are not pirating?

    Further, apps and services like this simply cannot exist without a bit of a safe-harbor. It's unreasonably stupid to expect them to self police every message, every file, looking for potential infringing content.

    tl;dr: suck it up butter cup. Go after the people selling counterfeits if you wish, but personal use? C'mon.

  29. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    That's my takeaway. I'll be seeing how easy this is when I get home and hoping that sickbeard/sickrage can automate it

  30. Thanks for the tip bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the tip bro

  31. Doesn't get much weaker by brasselv · · Score: 2

    This submission is bizarre.
    Even for trolling standards, the "news" is unbelievably silly.

    Any communication online (and offline for that matter) will be used to exchange illegal stuff.

    You can replace "Telegram" with "Email", "Google Drive", "Usenet" - or even "FedEx" and "Telephone".

    Any of those things are used for much worse than pirating content: *terrorists and rapists* use them for nefarious goals. So what?

    I don't hear "Telephone" getting the blame. Nor I hear Gmail being asked to pay more attention to the content of those emails. You don't expect the provider of such services to police private communications.

    What's the point of singling out Telegram, of all things?

    (In case this is Ivan following on today's directive "Find something to attack Telegram", then it's a very lazy attempt. Can do better, Ivan.)

    --
    "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    1. Re:Doesn't get much weaker by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      File movements on trusted brand are safe from police. Police cant see files moving due to super powerful smart crypto on trusted brand.
      Interesting people start to hide their very interesting communications in the huge flow of files. Good crypto and cover of larger herd of users around the world.
      Security services have many interesting people to study on fewer networks globally using one type of crypto.
      The more everyone interesting starts using one crypto design the more easy it is for the security services to collect it all globally.
      The 1930-80's is full of stories of nations selecting one brand of "trusted" crypto and then having other nations reading along in real time.
      The trick is selling the generation of users on one trusted brand so collect it all can work for many years.
      Think back to the US gov PRISM and all the trusted US OS and social media brands.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  32. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    This is entirely between the content owners and Telegram.

    Should you be arrested because you might commit a crime? That's what you're describing.

    You're missing the bigger picture, here.

    This is not about "pirated" content at all. That's simply being used as justification.

    This is about suppressing an encrypted communications channel that certain state actors including the US are fundamentally opposed to their populations having access to.

    You don't allow your slaves the ability to communicate securely to enable them to organize to throw off their chains.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  33. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by MalachiK · · Score: 1

    Yes. This is exactly correct.

  34. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Further, apps and services like this simply cannot exist without a bit of a safe-harbor.

    That's the real goal here, potential copyright infringement is justification, a 'cover-story'.

    Neither the US, Russia, UK, nor many other Western & Eastern/Middle-Eastern governments want their populations to have access to secure communication tools to enable the masses to conveniently communicate securely enough that it makes it difficult, labor-intensive, and time-consuming to do domestic intelligence operations within and data-collection and monitoring upon.

    You don't allow the livestock/slaves the tools to organize to achieve freedom like a secure way to communicate.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  35. Re:Apple & Google are responsible how, exactly by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re "I'm not sure what they are supposed to do about that"
    The security services will study the crypto and get an overview of the networks, users for their gov/mil.
    That builds the needed gov skill sets to understand any new network, crypto/communications.
    Ex and former gov/mil/law enforcement staff will offer their skills a contractors.
    The study of such networks will then be offered to anyone who can afford to pay for such networks to be looked into.
    Study the network to find the uploader and all the downloaders who use their own ISP and IP thinking file and app "crypto" will protect their networking.
    Automate the request for a password. Download many files. Investigate the files decrypted and checksums to sort the files downloaded.
    Sort files back to uploader and downloaders ip, isp just as any police force would do.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  36. Web browsers too by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Safari, Chrome, Firefox, and IE are guilty as well. Scrap them!

  37. Re: Apple & Google are responsible how, exactl by nazsco · · Score: 1

    You (and google lawyers) say that, yet every feature of your phone is tied to a google service app, which can only be installed in a signed fashion by the OEM that build and sold that device.

    GPS and all other radio (except bluetooth) are severely crippled without it. And location provider accelerators (like the one from mozilla) cannot even be installed (only with root, which is moot since that is too difficult or impossible on every single device --even developer edition ones)

    video acceleration and camera are other aspects that goes out if you don't have google secret sauce. but those are more related to chip manufaturer NDAs than anything else. Still google and OEMs are the de facto gatekeepers as far as smart phone buyers are concerned.

  38. Riddled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I presume the word riddled is being used in the context of "containing many things that are bad or not wanted."

    I don't see how that applies here. Someone is really grasping to find a way to attempt to disparage Telegram.