Slashdot Mirror
ULA Is Livestreaming An Atlas V Rocket Launch (upi.com)
United Launch Alliance -- a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Space Systems and Boeing -- is livestreaming tonight's launch of an Atlas V rocket. UPI reports:
The rocket is set to blast-off at 7:13 p.m. ET from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida... The primary payload is the Continuous Broadcast Augmenting SATCOM, or CBAS, a geostationary communications satellite... Behind the CBAS payload is EAGLE, a platform capable of releasing several secondary payloads into space. According to Gunter's Space Page, EAGLE is carrying five additional payloads, all experimental satellites.
Here's a good overview of the mission: Saturday's mission will begin with ignition of the Atlas Common Core Booster's RD-180 engine, 2.7 seconds before the countdown reaches zero... Five Aerojet Rocketdyne AJ-60A solid rocket motors will augment the CCB at liftoff, igniting about T+1.1 seconds as the rocket lifts off. Climbing away from Cape Canaveral, AV-079 will begin a series of pitch and yaw maneuvers 3.9 seconds into its mission, placing the rocket onto an 89.9-degree azimuth -- almost due East -- for the journey into orbit. Atlas will reach Mach 1, the speed of sound, 34.4 seconds after liftoff, passing through the area of maximum dynamic pressure -- Max-Q -- eleven-and-a-half seconds later.
Long-time Slashdot reader Zorro also shares an interesting remark by the CEO of Boeing when asked if Boeing's cancelled Sonic Cruiser might be making a comeback. "'Something better,' teased the Boeing boss, promising point-to-point connectivity anywhere on Earth in a matter of hours."
And when asked whether Boeing might launch a car into space, he replied instead that "We might pick up the one that's out there and bring it back."
Here's a good overview of the mission: Saturday's mission will begin with ignition of the Atlas Common Core Booster's RD-180 engine, 2.7 seconds before the countdown reaches zero... Five Aerojet Rocketdyne AJ-60A solid rocket motors will augment the CCB at liftoff, igniting about T+1.1 seconds as the rocket lifts off. Climbing away from Cape Canaveral, AV-079 will begin a series of pitch and yaw maneuvers 3.9 seconds into its mission, placing the rocket onto an 89.9-degree azimuth -- almost due East -- for the journey into orbit. Atlas will reach Mach 1, the speed of sound, 34.4 seconds after liftoff, passing through the area of maximum dynamic pressure -- Max-Q -- eleven-and-a-half seconds later.
Long-time Slashdot reader Zorro also shares an interesting remark by the CEO of Boeing when asked if Boeing's cancelled Sonic Cruiser might be making a comeback. "'Something better,' teased the Boeing boss, promising point-to-point connectivity anywhere on Earth in a matter of hours."
And when asked whether Boeing might launch a car into space, he replied instead that "We might pick up the one that's out there and bring it back."
It's Ralphie doing the commentary!
A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
I see Slashdot's the stand-in for the oh-so-necessary livestream discussion that ULA disabled for some reason...
Sad to see those SRBs when they jetison them. After seeing so many SpaceX launches, I automatically expect to see them orient themselves and then do a boostback burn. Then I have to remind myself... no, there's nothing about this craft that's going to be landing, it's all disposable.
I will pull over this spaceship right now!
A message to ULA: Don't bother; you're not interesting.
They brought Patrick Moore back from the dead to narrate.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Thanks Slashdot. Amazing.
If anybody wants to watch 7:13 ET is apparently 23:13 (UTC) so adjust for your own time zone... aaand you've missed it.
Trump is trying to escape via ROCKET? That explains the diapers in the golf shorts.. But where is he going to go? There aren't any Russian chicks on Mars yet.
The processes that drive developers to your pet project haven't changed any. Go and publish your langauge spec, and get cracking on your parser.
If your design is actually good, people will work on it. Nobody gives a shit what you feel - your feelings can go get fucked. Developers care about what actually is good, not what someone feels is good.
The companies involved have grown huge on the government tit. As the last yet unmerged defense contractors, you would think they would be have healthy competition among themselves. Instead they piece together these joint socialist feedings as they can't survive otherwise. The only thing they innovate in now is fleecing the public.
They are filled with mediocre talent and don't reward their engineers nor empower them anywhere near the 'scrappy' new competition. What good engineers exist are pushed down and buried.
Maybe they will stumble back to relevance, but more than likely they will fight by lobbyist and will just keep merging into even more ridiculous blobs of management suffocating what little innovation accidentally falls out.
Wake me up when they livestream the landing
And, of course it was posted after that.
Loser.
Atlas V thrust (2018): 3,827 kN
Saturn V thrust (1967): 35,100 kN
When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
Real Competition=good. This is attempted Marketing.
I've worked besides some really smart Boeing Space people. But they don't have the same drive that SpaceX does.
Hopefully, Boeing can get some drive and earn some headlines with deeds, not hype.
Suborbital passenger delivery anywhere in the world for 150+ people would be cool, if they can make it cost effective. 90 min to Tokyo sure would be nice, rather than 14+ hrs.
Venus, everybody knows the hot chicks are on all Venus
My wife and I were there and got to watch from the beach where they were filming shortly after liftoff. It was cool. You should go see one sometime.
Yeah, no shit. And how is it we are graced with a definition of âoeULAâ but then get thrown a reference to "Gunter's Space Blog" as if we ducking know what that is??
When you're an earthman they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the multi-orificed ovipositor.
Watching on the replay, what was the rocket doing between 7 and 10 seconds after ignition? it seemed to yaw quite a bit to the left before correcting, but there wasn't any comment on this in the commentary. Any idea why it did that?
This is great! I wish all launches were live streemed. I am still amazed that many people are fixated on minimizing rocket fuel cost. The move to purchase an air breathing engine for rockets is going to turn out to be a big financial mistake. It is fool hardy to think you can put an O2 liqifacation plant on a rocket. The physics are way way harder than landing a rocket vertically. And talk about carrying useless mass around... condensing coils, wings, full surface heat shielding for wings not only the inefficiency of trying to push that thing through the air at supersonic speeds. Blue Horizon and SpaceX have the low cost high performance idea down. For those who bad mouth using a giant rocket to deliver a small satalite package I say how big is the truck that delivers fedx packages? When all you need to add is fule the size of the truck does not matter much.
The suborbital travel doesn't even need to be net profitable on its own - it only needs a positive margin. Only "suborbital travel plus Mars tickets" needs to be net profitable. SpaceX added in suborbital travel because they were otherwise going to have these big expensive pieces of hardware just sitting around between launch windows. Might as well use them to bring in additional revenue during that time.
I will pull over this spaceship right now!