Slashdot Mirror


Demand For Batteries Is Shrinking, Yet Prices Keep On Going and Going ... Up (wsj.com)

schwit1 shares a report: Batteries on average cost 8.2% more than a year ago, while prices in the overall household-care segment rose only 1.8%, according to Nielsen. At a time when prices are stagnating on everything from toilet paper to diapers, such pricing power for a product that is increasingly obsolete has confounded shoppers [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled]. "As far as the prices go, you don't have a choice," said Samuel Hurly, a contractor from Mount Vernon, N.Y., as he scanned a Home Depot display of AAA batteries to power flashlights he uses on the job. Batteries ordered online take too long to arrive, Mr. Hurly said, and he finds cheaper, private-label options lose power too quickly.

Battery prices were more likely to fluctuate a few years ago, when Duracell was owned by consumer-products giant Procter & Gamble Co. and Energizer was part of Edgewell Personal Care Co. Those companies were more focused on their bigger, more profitable razor businesses -- Edgewell with Schick and P&G with Gillette. They would invest less in batteries, or slash prices to drive up volume, to compensate for weak sales in other units, said SunTrust analyst Bill Chappell. Energizer Holdings Inc. spun off from Edgewell in 2015, and Duracell broke apart from P&G a year later when it was acquired by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
schwit1 asks, "Both businesses have become more profit-focused since separating from their previous owners. Is the Energizer/Duracell duopoly ripe for disruption?"

6 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Ripe for disruption by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And not environmentally friendly to have disposable batteries with plastics and electrolyte compounds tossed into landfills.

    Time to ban disposable batteries and introduce LiON chemistry replacement cartridges for these old AA and AAA cells.

    1. Re:Ripe for disruption by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please ask a Galaxy Note 7 user about LiON batteries.

      The main Risk with swapping batteries, is the fact older devices may not be designed for them to run on. Not expecting them to heat up as much, putting them in a confined location where they cannot expand. And just different power usage and lasting power change, could effect the usefulness of products.

      Yes new devices should reconsider the standard batteries. But older devices there wern't much choices other then NiMH which have less of a life.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Ripe for disruption by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please ask a Galaxy Note 7 user about LiON batteries.

      Please ask Boeing.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  2. Most profit is on the retail side by technosaurus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Battery markups are not measured in percent, but multiples... 10X markup is not uncommon.

  3. Demand for "batteries..." by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Demand for batteries is likely going up, driven by electric cars, computers, phones, etc. What's going down is demand for STANDARD batteries. Many devices have proprietary batteries of all different sizes, often inaccessible to the user.

    Thing is, there's no good reason for it other than planned obsolescence. Take smartphones. Almost all of them use 3.7V LiIon batteries. Most of them are about 5 to 6 inches diagonally, with a specific height/width ratio. Time for an industry standard for swappable smartphone batteries. Imagine if you could just buy a battery at 7-11, pop the door, and swap it in when your phone's battery dies. Or maybe have a few different sizes, depending on screen size. Call then X, Y, and Z.

    But no, this will never happen because throwing things away is a big profit center for sellers of e-trinkets.

  4. Re:It was ripe for disruption a while ago by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't buy anything that's not rechargable

    I feel the exact opposite - I love AA devices. I want batteries to be replaceable and standard. I have rechargeable AA's. The batteries are obviously user-replacable. I can keep a bunch of them charged for quick swaps. I don't need to figure out which device needed to be charged, I just put the AAs in the charger from wherever they came from. I don't need to move the devices to near an outlet to charge them. And, in an emergency, I can just get a bunch of non-rechargable AAs from the store to run devices.

    I'm clearly a large enough use case that it's driving single use batteries into a niche market.

    I'm not sure that's really true. While the number of rechargable devices has exploded, most of those are things are replacing power cords, not AAs.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!