Slashdot Mirror


FDA Approves First Contact Lenses That Turn Dark In Bright Sunlight (interestingengineering.com)

The first photochromic contact lenses have been approved by the FDA. "A unique additive will automatically darken the lenses when they're exposed to bright light," reports Interesting Engineering, citing a FDA statement. "The lenses will clear up whenever they're back in normal or darker lighting conditions." From the report: "This contact lens is the first of its kind to incorporate the same technology that is used in eyeglasses that automatically darken in the sun," said Malvina Eydelman. Eydelman serves as director of the division of ophthalmic, and ear, nose and throat devices at the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. The FDA approved the technology after extensive trials and clinical studies. One study had 24 wearers use the contacts while driving in both daytime and nighttime settings. The FDA found that there were no problems with driving performance or issues with vision while wearing those contact lenses. In total, over 1,000 patients were involved in the various studies conducted by the FDA. According to current plans, these photochromic lenses should be available for those needing them by the first half of 2019.

104 comments

  1. Nightvision by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    First reading of "FDA Approves First Contact Lenses That Turn Dark Into Bright Sunlight" was incorrect.

    But I want contact lenses that compress the EM spectrum from UV to microwaves into visual spectrum. So you can see IR, and the world at night is usually illuminated with UV. So outside dark would be UV illuminated, and indoor dark would be IR illuminated. Night vision in contact lenses. When do I get that?

    1. Re: Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Geordi LaForge

    2. Re:Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Compressing" UV and microwave into the visible spectrum? I could be wrong but I believe you'd need to go the other direction.

      Compressing IR though, that could work. You do know, don't you, that IR and UV are at opposite ends of the visible spectrum?

      Out of curiosity though, what makes you think that "outdoor dark" is "illuminated" with UV?

      Other than these minor details though, it's brilliant. Can I have some of what you're smoking?

    3. Re: Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new I.T. closet cleaner overlord.

    4. Re:Nightvision by suutar · · Score: 2

      No, not compressing UV radiation, compressing much of the EM spectrum (like, the block from 1cm to 10nm) into the visible range (700nm to 400nm). Mapping, or converting, if you would like a more apt word.

      I want those too, though I'd be happy enough with goggles.

    5. Re: Nightvision by chaboud · · Score: 1

      So, knowing that it's pretty easy to make a monochromatic sensor that is succeptible to IR and/or UV (and pretty easy to reject/pass wavelength ranges), I figured there would be Bayer patterned hyper-spectral sensor packages and cameras aplenty, making it easy to build this sort of goggle setup via chromatic tone mapping.

      I know that NASA built IR-mapping goggles (think less sensitive nightvision) for their firefighters, as hydrogen fires are hard to see in the visible spectrum (mild blue).

      I was wrong about part availability. This will be harder than I thought...

    6. Re:Nightvision by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      Hell... thats half the reason I'm still resentful that the nerd-hating hipster brigade managed to so effectively torpedo Google Glass. Sure, it was half-baked and over priced as released. But it was the obvious first step towards Terminator & Predator vision, dammit. Realistically, IR & UV cameras plus ultrasound and maybe LIDAR, all feeding into a A/R HUD overlay, is a bit more realistic than contacts that do magic things with the EM spectrum, I would think.

      (Unless, perhaps, those contacts are a miniature LDC display themselves. And maybe they can double as the eye-tracking component. But I'm not sure how you realistically generate the data to be displayed without a camera in the mix somewhere.)

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    7. Re:Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called IR camera

    8. Re: Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe night vision goggles will scratch that particular itch..

    9. Re:Nightvision by sabbede · · Score: 1

      That would be awesome, but I don't think there's a way to do it without a powered receptor and emitter setup, which just won't fit into contacts yet. You'd need a material with nanoparticles that fluoresce when exposed to IR, but only when there's very little visible light. It might be a little easier with UV if there's a material that could slow down the incoming waves enough to red-shift them into the visible spectrum.

    10. Re: Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop self-promoting yourself.

    11. Re:Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell... thats half the reason I'm still resentful that the nerd-hating hipster brigade managed to so effectively torpedo Google Glass.

      I assure you, even among nerds ... some asshole in a bar streaming their life up to Google was unpopular.

      You're essentially saying "hi, I'm an asshole, and I'm quite possibly streaming this to the internet".

      Cry me a river

    12. Re:Nightvision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of us certainty seems to suffer from an extremely bad case of a lack of reading comprehension. And I dont believe its me. What I read was an expressed desire for an augmented reality display based on speculative technology from a pair of 1980s Schwarzenegger movies; and an acknowledgment that a camera would be part of the tech stack necessary to make said display work. Thats all. Kind of silly and maybe tacky. But harmless.

      Or perhaps youd care to quote the part of the gp post that says anything about a plan or desire to stream anything to anywhere?

    13. Re:Nightvision by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But Google Glass wasn't AR. AR with a UV overlay would be great, but Glass was a tiny display, out of the main visual path, not like VR goggles, which block 100% and when used for AR, re-send the environment, along with the augmentation.

  2. Danger by jargonburn · · Score: 5, Funny

    But will they turn dark in the face of danger?

    1. Re:Danger by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 1

      That's insufficient.

      There's the need for the letters "DON'T PANIC!" to appear.

      The rest should be pitch black, yes.

      --
      urd
  3. SSL Error by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 0

    Unsupported version.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  4. Re: Trump won't need em. by TheMeuge · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My guess is that this is a Russian troll too, or an American moron. What the left seem to not realize is that there is something far more valuable for Russia, as a competitor to the US, than a friendly president... it's the whole of the US at each other's throats and the collapse of our political system. That my friends is the long term destabilization that will have Russia back on top on the international arena. They don't care about Trump... they'd much rather we were fighting each other. And we're playing into their hands.

  5. Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's dark by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Imagine driving during the day and entering a dark tunnel with these on. When you do it with sun glasses on you immediately rip them off so you don't crash. There are other less extreme high contrast situations where these might turn dark when you want to see in the shadows. I can't see how these would be allowed for safety reasons.

  6. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by erice · · Score: 4, Informative

    Doesn't matter. They won't darken at all in a car. The react to UV and the windshield blocks UV. This is the same way that photosensitive eyeglasses work. If, like me, you only wear glasses when driving, the photosensitivity is completely useless.

  7. First contact lenses? by starless · · Score: 0

    So, when we make first contact with aliens, the lenses will turn dark?

    Or am I misreading the heading...?

    1. Re: First contact lenses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the same thing at first... tiny phone in portrait mode.

  8. Do they make some that darken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the presence of food? Chris, I mean, errr, someone I know, wants to know.

  9. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually, the photosensitive glasses can react to UV light. All the ones that I used / see my friends use does.
    But google results says "Some photochromic lenses also react to visible light" (eg https://www.essilorindia.com/learn-about-vision/all-about-lenses/lenses-for-glasses/photochromic-lenses ) so may be that's not as ubiquitous as I thought.

    Don't know which type the contact lenses would be tho.

  10. Eye color by Scutter · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I can't wait until everyone is walking around with soulless black eyes just like Zuckerbot.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Eye color by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it make sense to only darken the central part i.e. the bit over the pupil?

      There would be no point in darkening the iris unless you wanted soulless black eyes just like a Zuckerbot...

  11. Law of Unintended Consequence by Kotukunui · · Score: 2

    Being out in bright sunlight and seeing those lens wearers with weird blanked out eyes. Who will be the first one shot by some redneck with the excuse "Ah thort they was'n alien or a zombie, so I blasted that there creepy-eyed f*ck*r"

    1. Re:Law of Unintended Consequence by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Being out in bright sunlight and seeing those lens wearers with weird blanked out eyes. Who will be the first one shot by some redneck with the excuse "Ah thort they was'n alien or a zombie, so I blasted that there creepy-eyed f*ck*r"

      Yeah, that'll happen. It's always those darn rednecks shooting people.

      I'm going to stay downtown where it's safe!

  12. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine driving a convertible. With the top down. I bet they do darken.

  13. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by erice · · Score: 1

    I've owned two pairs. Neither reacted to visible light. I even asked about this last time and the shop didn't have any that reacted to visible light.

  14. Re: Trump won't need em. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 0

    C'mon, you're on /., so you have to be smart enough to realize that 4chan affected the elections more than Russia did, and had better trolling and memes. The whole Trump-Russia thing was a dodge for Clinton. Trump is more clearly in bed with the Saudis and Israel and any American oligarch that will pay him the slightest bit of attention, and those have more conflicts of interest for American citizens than whatever the hell the master plan is.

    Plus, you fuckwits opened the door for war with Syria.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  15. Re: Trump won't need em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The whole Trump-Russia thing was a dodge for Clinton" - Except for the people going to prison, sure! Why pretend they aren't going though? You're a denialist?

  16. Contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like something I read in a science fiction book - contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight.

    The glasses know where my pupils are, and where the sun is. Each lens automatically draws an opaque disk onto itself, between the eye's pupil the sun. If I turn my head, each lens draws its disk in a new location, blocking the direct sunlight from entering my eye's pupil.

    Those glasses would be handy on a non-hazy day, when I'm driving towards the sun.

    1. Re:Contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      I've been saying for a couple of decades that I want to see car windshields do that. And it would be really easy to do on that scale.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steve Mann and his EyeTap work included this for a specialist AR application.

      Specifically a HDR welding mask to occlude the bright tip of a welding rig.

      http://www.eyetap.org/~siggraph2012/

    3. Re:Contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight by rl117 · · Score: 2

      There's a problem with the technology though. It darkens principally in response to UV exposure, not ambient daylight. Normally they correlate, but you can be in thick cloud where it's grey and not at all bright, but the UV level is still very high. Under this type of condition, the lens turns black and it's like night time, with the world barely visible. In a car windscreen, that would be positively dangerous.

    4. Re:Contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should only install that tech in self driving cars.

    5. Re:Contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing the technology in the summary with the fictional technology being referred to in the comment you are replying to.

    6. Re:Contacts or glasses that block direct sunlight by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The fictional technology I'm suggesting involves a thin film LCD layer in the windshield glass, coupled with an eye tracking/head tracking camera inside the car and a sun-tracking camera outside the car.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  17. Re: Trump won't need em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must have slept through Nixon. Democratically elected = Democratically unelected or legally disqualified. If you can't play by the laws, you go to the time out box. It's simple, but you blew it. Take notes - Trump will go to prison.

  18. Re: Trump won't need em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is that you've confused about which side the Russian Trolls are trolling for. Either that or you are in fact the actual Russian Troll.

    Although sometimes the Trolls play both sides, just to keep the dialog going. But first there needs to be some dialog; more than one post anyway.

    Off hand Dmitri I'd say you blew your cover. Go to bed, it's late in Moscow.

  19. Tried contacts, it was a no go for me. by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    I gave contacts a try, but I just could not tolerate sticking myself in the eye to put them in. And besides, at the time they were not very good at correcting both nearsightedness and astigmatism at the same time. Add to that the need for bifocals for close reading. Discovered that when I had to start taking my glasses off to read small print.

    Anyway, the permanent imprints on my nose from 45+ years of wearing spectacles will remain until I die.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re: Tried contacts, it was a no go for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a very hard time inserting contacts, until I stumbled upon the trick of putting them on the white of my eye, and blinking them into place.
      Don't know why the optician didn't know about that. They insisted that it should be placed directly on the pupil, which always triggered a very strong blink reflex.

    2. Re:Tried contacts, it was a no go for me. by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 2

      I am both myopic and have an astigmatism. The lenses are weighted to align them. They're gas-permeable, seconds to pop in, a blink to eject. Being hard, they help shape the cornea. so they're far superior to soft. Being permeable, it's quite safe to sleep with them in. As I've grown older, I double-dialed my acuity to read with my right and drive with my left. The brain handles the difference just fine. I've been on various iterations of hard lenses for 40 years and for me it's never been a problem.

    3. Re:Tried contacts, it was a no go for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeebus you have been wearing glasses longer than i care to be alive.

  20. I had these twenty years and a month ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like uninformed reporters spewing fake news. They sucked compared to the glasses I bought in 1979 since they're so much slower to become less opaque.

    1. Re:I had these twenty years and a month ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. How are these different from the contacts I had in the late 1980s?

    2. Re:I had these twenty years and a month ago by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      The silver oxide that turns dark will affect your eyelids and turn them blue.

  21. Re: Trump won't need em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Treason? That's a serious and very specific charge. Naturally, you have evidence?

  22. Re: Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Close one eye for 30s prior to entering the tunnel...

  23. Re:For th love of God by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Transition lenses have never been on contact lenses before this.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  24. Re: Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Drive like a pirate! Arrr!

  25. I wouldn't mind glasses that let me see better by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    at night. As I've gotten older I'm hyper sensitive to light and my vision quality's gone down. The two combined can sometimes almost completely blind me at night (between folks lights and already less than perfect vision). I'm guessing by my mid-50s I won't be able to drive at night...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I wouldn't mind glasses that let me see better by Rob+Lister · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are describing the first symptoms of cataracts. I just had cataract surgery so I know what you're experiencing. Having the surgery is like getting teenage eyesight back. I can even make out the color bands on 1/8th ohm resistors again.

    2. Re: I wouldn't mind glasses that let me see better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree you should be checked for cataracts but also, road and vehicle lighting is much worse these days. LED street and stop lights are cranked full blast all night leading to major glare on both eyes and windshield, especially if raining. Itâ(TM)s awful. The worst are emergency vehicles, which after stopping leave the full flashers/strobes going. If someone walked in front of my car as I was passing an accident or pull-over I would be unable to see them until I hit them. This attitude of blinding drivers in the name of lighting up the streets like daylight is asinine.

    3. Re:I wouldn't mind glasses that let me see better by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Yep. Not only is it fast to get done, but if you need reading glasses they can even put in new lenses that fall into the multi-focal range. My dad had his eyes done a few years ago at 60ish, for him it was pretty much a life changing event especially since his eyes had gotten so bad he couldn't even go star gazing anymore.

      The big problem I'm seeing these days though is with all the new LED lights, they're mounted high on poles and seem to be angled so that they blind you when you're approaching them. I get that white light is supposed to be the new-hot thing and all that, but hearing what some of the truck drivers even those in their early 20's go on about they wish they'd bring back the low-pressure sodium lights that were orange. Round that out with the HiD lighting on a lot of the newer cars, there's an awful lot of stuff on the road that will blind you.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:I wouldn't mind glasses that let me see better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at night. As I've gotten older I'm hyper sensitive to light and my vision quality's gone down. The two combined can sometimes almost completely blind me at night (between folks lights and already less than perfect vision). I'm guessing by my mid-50s I won't be able to drive at night...

      Here's my best suggestion for you ... yellow lenses. (OK, the people who pointed out getting eye tests and being checked for cataracts have better advice.)

      Seriously, not tinted to limit the light (you don't want that at night), but a clear yellow lens. Preferably with UV blocking, and maybe anti-glare. Definitely NOT polarised, because I've seen cases where some traffic lights become invisible with polarised lenses, same for LED displays if the orientations are at 90 degrees.

      It cuts down on the glare, improves light and colour contrast in low light conditions, reduces eye strain, and they're easy to find. For daytime, I recommend a clear orange lens, because again, it blocks the blue lights and improves colour contrast. Blue light is the enemy of seeing at night.

      A friend laughed at me once for my yellow pair, which live in the glovebox of my car. Then I got him to put them on and look around. He went out the next day and bought a pair. The difference between what you can see with them is significant.

      As much as they have a tragic connection to those "as seen on TV" things to go over your glasses, people have been using yellow lenses as a go-to for twilight or low light conditions for decades, but not a lot of people seem to know about them. The ones that claim to he "high definition vision" have no special properties, any yellow lens achieves the same result.

      I've been exclusively wearing orange lenses in daylight conditions for like 20 years, and more recently the yellow lenses in lower light. Even when it's fully dark out, they improve what you see when driving.

      Seriously, I'm not joking ... go find yourself a pair, keep in your car, and the next time it's twilight or even dark, put them on. You will see far better at night than you do now.

      Good luck! You might be amazed what a relatively inexpensive pair of those will do for your night driving.

    5. Re:I wouldn't mind glasses that let me see better by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Agreed with the yellow lens recommendation. I've got a pair that's polarized, which is brilliant for driving on wet streets (just abouts eliminates the glare from sun reflecting on the street/in puddles).

      The only issue with polarization I've found is that I have to use my phone (for navigation) in landscape mode rather than portrait (but I was already doing that anyway). Haven't found any polarized traffic lights. Over here (.nl) they went from incancescent light to LED, neither use polarization. Matrix signs are LED too, so no issue there either.

    6. Re:I wouldn't mind glasses that let me see better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had both eyes done in June 2017...opted for the pricey lenses. Now my vision is almost worse than before I had the surgery....Sigh

  26. Re: Trump won't need em. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 0

    Look, everyone in Trump's cabinet is a crook in half a dozen ways, at least. But the strongest evidence that Trump and his campaign didn't collude with Russia is that they won. Everything they touch turns to shit, and they would all be more a liability than an asset. Russia is the dumbest way to attack Trump, and it's provided cover for John Bolton to come back and start another stupid war over claims of WMDs with nowhere near enough evidence.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  27. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter. They won't darken at all in a car. The react to UV and the windshield blocks UV.

    I found this out (unfortunately) after the single time I bought photochromic eyeglass lenses.

    It’s the situation where auto-darkening lenses would come in the handiest, but they don’t work. I guess I should’ve done my homework beforehand.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  28. Re:Trump won't need em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI: Trump will not be impeached unless Pence is impeached first.
    If you think Trump's bad... just imagine President Pence. *shudder*

    tl;dr: Pence is Trump's impeachment insurance.

  29. inad by Torvac · · Score: 1

    afaik and im not a doctor, your eyes will slowly lose their own ability to adapt to light/dark if you use glasses or lenses like this.

    1. Re:inad by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, I heard the same thing about the auto-darkening eyeglasses that came out several years back. They worked great when you first got them, but after a few years they stop darkening as well and develop a permanent yellow tinge when they're "clear". I guess this wouldn't matter so much if they were disposable contacts you only wore for 3-6 months.

    2. Re:inad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > im not a docot
      And thank God for that.
      People say the same bullshit about about your eyes not fixing themselves if you wear prescription glasses.
      Besides, even if it's true all that means is that once you take them off your eyes will regain that ability.

    3. Re:inad by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      If it's a muscle that contracts the pupil, then it might atrophy, but then it could be exercised and restored later.

  30. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it's a regional thing. Here in HK, most of the photochromatic lenses uses a brand (?) called Transitions which claims to " responds to both UV light and natural (visible, clear or white) light, so they are able to darken in the car ". I would guess there are other companies that make similar lenses, but just in case you need a name to start searching. https://www.transitions.com/en-us/why-transitions/the-technology/photochromic-tech/

  31. Re: Trump won't need em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pence wants to nuke the Mideast for Christianity, but he doesn't care to nuke NK.

    Trump wants to nuke anything.. Iran, NK, Puerto Rico, anything but Russia, so he can distract the media for twenty minutes, plus it will show he is a real man.. unlike those pussies who sought peace.

  32. I don't like these on eye glasses. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I tried those autochange lenses on eye glasses. It's annoying like indoor in movie theat(re/er)s, meeting rooms, etc. I'd rather control them myself with external shades.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  33. Driving into a tunnel by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I find that when wearing sunglasses if I drive into a tunnel I have to take them off. This even applies to the light sensitive sunglasses that took quite a long time to lighten up - much longer than most tunnels. Unless these react much quicker than the old ones I would see this as a problem.

  34. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had *glass* lenses with photochromatic tint for many years. They weren't dependent on the presence of UV - they'd darken in strong visible light, i.e. sunlight - they wouldn't darken in bright internal light. Perhaps they did need a bit of UV.

    Poly lenses with "transitions' tint need UV to darken, so they're useless for driving - unless you hang your specs out the side window for a minute. And that's a bit dangerous while driving.

  35. Wearing only one contact by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    I'm only far sighted in my right eye, so I just wear one contact. For a brief moment I thought "Oh this sounds like it might be nice." And then realized this wouldn't go well for me (unless I started wearing a sun monocle?).

    1. Re:Wearing only one contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd probably be able to get one that only reacts to the light and doesn't apply correction for your good eye.

    2. Re:Wearing only one contact by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      A sun monocle sounds like most awesome thing ever.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  36. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it's a regional thing. Here in HK, most of the photochromatic lenses uses a brand (?) called Transitions which claims to " responds to both UV light and natural (visible, clear or white) light, so they are able to darken in the car ".

    They have those literally everywhere people spend more than a couple bucks on glasses, so GP just walked into a store full of morons. Sadly, morons can easily get retail jobs if they are attractive.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  37. why? by sad_ · · Score: 1

    cool that we can do this, but why? can't you just wear sunglasses, i bet that's a cheaper option.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to lose or break sunglasses, since they aren't needed all the time. If I put them in my pocket they are likely to get damaged, if I don't put them in my pocket, I'll probably put them down somewhere and forget to pick them up again.

    2. Re:why? by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Get the Sawfly sunglasses the troops use. Stand up to a 12 gauge shotgun at 13 feet. You won't put them down somewhere and lose them because they're over $100. There, problem solved...

  38. What a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Losers like you are why Trump won. America thanks you.

  39. How creepy do they look? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    It may be a bit off-putting to see someone's irises turn black, no?

  40. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    They must have changed their coating since I bought mine, because I have Transitions and my glasses do not darken in the car.

  41. Cop pulls you over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riding in a convertible, cop pulls you over....

    Please step out of the car sir, you have obviously been doing cocaine.

  42. You don't understand what visible light is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had *glass* lenses with photochromatic tint for many years. They weren't dependent on the presence of UV - they'd darken in strong visible light, i.e. sunlight - they wouldn't darken in bright internal light.

    If they darken in sunlight, but not interior light, they were reacting to non-visible light. Just like all photochromatic lenses commercially available do.

    The sun produces ALL types of light, including infrared and ultraviolet. Light bulbs don't. The infra means below the range seen by human beings and the ultra means above the range seen by human beings. Many non-human animals can see more or less of the range of light than humans can; the world is vastly more colorful and complex than our eyes can detect.

  43. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    That is exactly why I don't bother with transition glasses. The main time I need sunglasses is when I am driving, exactly the condition when they don't work. If I had kept with a convertible they would be fine. Also where I live, if I were to explore the outdoors, I would be in the forest where it is rather shady.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  44. Missing the point of contact lenses. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Contact Lenses are primarily for vanity purposes. So you can correct your vision without the need of noticeable glasses.
    However having your eyes turn black when it is light outside will make you look rather odd.
    Sunglasses make you look cool.
    Black contact lenses make you look like you are on drugs or something is wrong with you.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Missing the point of contact lenses. by cellocgw · · Score: 2

      Contact Lenses are primarily for vanity purposes.

      You must have paid someone to type what you said, because nobody that stupid could handle a computer. Contact lenses provide drastically better vision, over a full field of view, without secondary reflections, without distortion, without stress on nose or ears... ahhh, forget it. You're beyond help.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    2. Re:Missing the point of contact lenses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say DRASTICALLY better vision; in fact, my glasses have better optical quality than my contacts. Field of view? Contacts. Secondary reflections? Tie (I always get AR coatings on my glasses though). Distortion? My glasses are better. Comfort? Tie (glasses don't dry out and make my eyes tired after 10-12 hours).

      Primary reason I wear contacts? Vanity.

  45. As a contact lens wearer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I wouldn't be interested in this. I can remove non-prescription sunglasses whenever I need to, and everything gets brighter instantly. Those auto-darkening eyeglasses take time to "un-dim." You can't just take out contact lenses when you're driving, etc.

  46. Certain Situations by rally2xs · · Score: 1

    Certain situations don't accommodate such action well.

    I first got glasses that did this in the 70's. I was a 2-way radio tech at the time. I'd get into a trunk of some cop car where the radio was, it was fairly dark, and because the car was outside in the sun, my glasses were dark and I couldn't see squat about what I was doing. Got rid of such glasses at the next prescription change. Contacts might be a little harder to change out for clear ones than glasses.

  47. Re: Trump won't need em. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    I want Trump shot into the sun. I'm not pro-Trump, I'm anti-Trump. The reason I'm opposing your bullshit is because it is THE LEAST EFFECTIVE WAY TO TAKE TRUMP DOWN. Plus, 'treason' is such an outdated mindset that has nothing to do with the kind of real threats that exist today.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  48. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine driving during the day and entering a dark tunnel with these on.

    I don't have to imagine it, I live it every day. And no, I don't take them off. I can't. Because they are prescription glasses and I am legally blind without them.

  49. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    If this is a legitimate problem then you have a very poorly designed lighting system in your tunnel.

    Also you do realise these aren't your pitch black stare at the sun welding glasses right? They only have a limited range of tonal variation.

  50. Actually, "+1 informativee" by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Drive like a pirate! Arrr!

    Which was also one of the reasons why some pirates wore eyepatch.
    (note because of wounds, but to keep the covered eye sensitive in the darkness as soon as the ship needs to hide in the shadow and manoeuvre in the darkness of a shaded creek / of a large cave, etc.).

    So closing an eye so an light sensitive contact len worn inside the car / UV-sensitive contact len worn in a convertible doesn't darken and keeps you able to see and navigate your car in the darkness of a tunnel is *litteraly" driving like a pirate.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  51. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nor do mine.

    But then again, those lenses had terrible optical quality (even added a faint yellowish tinge to everything) so I wouldn't be surprised in the least if I got charged for Transitions(TM) but actually received a generic rip-off.

  52. Re:Safety-How fast can y take them off when it's d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had thought about installing some UV LEDs in my car that I could turn on with a switch in order to darken my glasses. But I decided against it because I didn't want to risk eye/skin damage from excessive UV radiation.

  53. Re:For th love of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Translation Lenses? Is that some new augmented reality shit that automatically converts signs from foreign languages into one the wearer can read?

  54. Latency or Transition time by espinozahg · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to know how fast those lenses react to sudden changes of light. For example when driving from a dark tunnel right into sunny open road conditions or vice-verse.