Slashdot Mirror


Puerto Rico is Experiencing an Island-Wide Blackout (engadget.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Seven months after Hurricane Maria devastated the island of Puerto Rico, the power grid is still unstable. But progress was being made; according to CBS, less than 10 percent of the island was without power as of a month ago. But now, the Associated Press reports that the island is undergoing yet another full blackout. The power company is still investigating the cause and estimates it will take 24 to 36 hours for power to be restored. The saga of Puerto Rico's power grid has been an unhappy one. The US territory was already facing a financial crisis before the hurricane hit. The island only has one electric company, and prior to Maria, it was $9 billion in debt and utilizing outdated infrastructure and equipment.

144 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. How is that possible?? by Higaran · · Score: 2

    How can any company be so far in debt and still operating, in any shape or form. I would have figured they would have closed long ago and their assets sold to other companies.

    1. Re: How is that possible?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it's so unprofitable to operate there, other companies won't want to buy in just to lose money?

    2. Re:How is that possible?? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Government. It is both the cause, because it is seen as the only solution.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:How is that possible?? by tomhath · · Score: 3, Informative

      PREPA - Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority is a public corporation, not private. One of the benefits of socialized utilities is that they can spend other people's money forever.

    4. Re:How is that possible?? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      The government must keep it running regardless of its financial woes. It's not Sears losing to Walmart.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re: How is that possible?? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      PREPA is in the process of being sold off.

      The modern standard would be to setup an independent system operator (ISO), a transmission operations company, sell each of the generation units separately and dispatch via power bids into a pool.

      We'll see what the corrupt government of Puerto Rico does. I bet the whole thing ends up in the hands of contributors, particularly any profitable, low cost, generation stations.

      The key problem the power company has is not getting paid for the power they generate, which private enterprise can help fix, not being beholding to voters.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re: How is that possible?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Poor people assuming no one will ever try to reclaim their debts. Local Government has always assumed the US would bail them out, thus the corruption. What you're seeing now is quite calculated, PR to make the US Government look bad. Media will eat it up too.

      Never let a tragedy go to waste where profit an be exploited. It's unlikely _any_ of these fuckers will spend a day in jail let alone pay.

      Fun fact, it happens everywhere a service is deemed a necessity. Ontario for example is STILL paying off debts from Ontario Hydro / Hydro One / Liberal Slush Fund. Difference is we have added risks because people invested their pensions'n shit in the scheme. Remember the power outage that knocked out everything from NY to Ontario? Yeah, it's still held over our head to justify RETARDED spending on hydro.

    7. Re:How is that possible?? by bobbied · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The government of PR has over spent on other things so are incapable of bailing out the electric company. The electric company hasn't been maintaining it's infrastructure for decades. Hurricane comes though and blows away what little infrastructure was there. This is the result.

      It's a catch 22... Folks are leaving the island in droves because living conditions suck, reducing economic activity and reducing tax receipts the government has to service it's debt and sucking any cash available to improve living conditions, public infrastructure and law enforcement which leads to a lower standard of living... Rinse lather and repeat... But this downward spiral has been going on long before last year's storm, it just hastened the process.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re: How is that possible?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hydro Quebec disagrees with your assessment.

    9. Re: How is that possible?? by Bryansix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is investing in Hydro bad? Its a very stable baseload generator for the power grid. The main problem is getting the power over the transmission lines to where it is needed. This was a problem with the 50-60 year old tech probably in place but it's not as much of an issue with current tech and equipment. This means the transmission and distribution circuits need to be upgraded and that costs money. They also have to upgrade the substation equipment to bring in redundancy, allow for better power protection, and better regulate the voltage coming from the substation as well as the voltages on the individual branch lines of each circuit. Spending on infrastructure upgrades is not only a good idea, its necessary.

    10. Re: How is that possible?? by dj245 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      PREPA's has deferred maintenance on their power plants for so long that it would be very expensive to rehabilitate many of them into anything resembling a reliable condition. They have turbine rotors that have been sitting outside rusting for years. Even if they gave me a power plant for free, I wouldn't want to attempt to turn it into a profitable enterprise. Plus, since they have burned many power plant repair companies so badly, most will not work for PREPA until past bills are paid AND new work is paid in advance.

      Source- PREPA owes my company a large sum of money for power plant work done before the hurricanes.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    11. Re: How is that possible?? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      With a population of 3.74 million people, it works out to $2406/person, 8.7%GDP. on a per capita income of ~$20k.

    12. Re: How is that possible?? by Walter+White · · Score: 2, Informative

      We'll see what the corrupt government of Puerto Rico does.

      Before you lay the entire blame on the Puerto Rican government I suggest you broaden your sources a bit. Quoting from Wikipedia

      The Government of Puerto Rico is a republican form of government with separation of powers, subject to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the United States.

      (emphasis mine.)

      For more on that, please see https://congressionaldish.com/....

      I doubt that PR is entirely blameless for their present situation, but they've had a lot of help from our congress.

    13. Re: How is that possible?? by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      The key problem the power company has is not getting paid for the power they generate, which private enterprise can help fix, not being beholding to voters.

      So the answer is....collection enforcers without legal restrictions?
      well THAT will help Puerto Rico to recover from the economic catastrophe of Trumpery.
      Wait, no...

    14. Re: How is that possible?? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The answer is cutting off deadbeats. Same as in your hometown.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re: How is that possible?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Congress hasn't made Puerto Rico embezzle their maintenance funds, sell their equipment on the black market, refuse to pay creditors, and in general act like any other corrupt third-world country.

      If Congress wanted to, they could have forced PR to obey US laws, but there's been a longstanding fear of seeming "imperialist", so they've allowed the local courts (run by local judges) screw over every Continental company they was stupid enough to try to help.

      Now they're forced to live with the consequences of their mistakes, and all they want is to blame someone else.

    16. Re: How is that possible?? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Keep it up. That's how your going to get a second term.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    17. Re:How is that possible?? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      People leaving the island is a free market working.

      it's just that the free market they are migrating to isn't on the island...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    18. Re: How is that possible?? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Corporations go bankrupt all the time. Businesses spin up, they stand or fall on their own. That's how it's done.

      Enjoy the next 7 years.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:How is that possible?? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure they will be the 51st state in short order. A great Puerto Rico purchase, all funded by the US tax payer. Why bring them to the states when they can buy votes where they live now?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    20. Re: How is that possible?? by edtice1559 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt nothing in your statement. But PR has no money due a number of factors of which years of mismanagement is one. The inability to make necessary capital investments is a big problem.

    21. Re: How is that possible?? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Congress is responsible for a lot of the poverty in PR. Christ, a ship from China isn't even allowed to dock in PR because of US laws - everything has to go to mainland US and brought over on US ships. The costs are staggering - one Walmart with access to direct shipping could do more to help PR than dozens of hair-brained political schemes. And good luck attracting private capital when the markets are regulated beyond the breaking point.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:How is that possible?? by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      PREPA - Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority [aeepr.com] is a public corporation, not private. One of the benefits of socialized utilities is that they can spend other people's money forever.

      Socialized utilities work pretty well in other parts of the United States (e.g. TVA). So what's different about Puerto Rico? Oh, yeah. That's right. It's dirt poor in large part because of bad U.S. trade policies that actual states don't have to deal with (the Jones Act in particular). They wouldn't be in this mess if the Puerto Rico statehood referendum had passed back in 1998. This has jack to do with socialized utilities and everything to do with Congress treating Puerto Rico like America's bastard child.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    23. Re:How is that possible?? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a golden opportunity for solar panel salespeople.

    24. Re: How is that possible?? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Keep up the shrill screeching.

      4 more years!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    25. Re: How is that possible?? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      We'll see what the corrupt government of Puerto Rico does.

      Before you lay the entire blame on the Puerto Rican government I suggest you broaden your sources a bit. Quoting from Wikipedia

      The Government of Puerto Rico is a republican form of government with separation of powers, subject to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the United States.

      And? So is Chicago.

      Both are leftist fiefdoms. They reap what they sow.

    26. Re:How is that possible?? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Only if the customers have the money to pay for the product.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    27. Re: How is that possible?? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Yet the bastards still won't leave and sell their property cheap, what do we have to start shooting them. Don't they know they are holding up billions in highly profitable developments done for maximum profit on cheap land provided by US legislative action and US government inaction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... just so you don't think they are picking on you https://www.youtube.com/watch?... whoops wrong one, how about https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (get past the US tiny bit).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    28. Re: How is that possible?? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Keep it up. That's how your going to get a second term.

      My going to get a second term?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    29. Re: How is that possible?? by will_die · · Score: 1

      Where did you read that lie?
      The law you are attempting to understand is the Merchant Marine Act of 1920. What that actually does is prevent a non-USA boat from transporting goods between US and Puerto Rico docks.
      So a China ship could deliver directly to PR without going to the mainland.
      The problem with that is the corruption of PR is such that their docks suck and with the economics of ship transportation such a transportation would not be economically feasible.

    30. Re: How is that possible?? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Congress is responsible for a lot of the poverty in PR.

      Up until a decade or so ago Puerto Rico was rolling in cash with it's special tax breaks, allowing hihly-profitable manufacturing to be done on the island with minimal taxes. When the tax deal ended, the manufacturing jobs left, and Puerto Rico couldn't stop spending money it didn't have, hence the massive debt.

      Christ, a ship from China isn't even allowed to dock in PR because of US laws - everything has to go to mainland US and brought over on US ships.

      Because Puerto Rico is so big it often has full-size trans-oceanic container ships with their entire load dedicated to PR market arrive every week from China, passing though the Panama Canal? Seriously, you think the problem is related to shipping regulations?

      The costs are staggering - one Walmart with access to direct shipping could do more to help PR than dozens of hair-brained political schemes. And good luck attracting private capital when the markets are regulated beyond the breaking point.

      Wow, which regulation forced PR to defer maint. work on their infrastructure? What would PR do different with independence and home rule? Right now the best thing going on the Puerto Rico front is their ability to migrate to the US at-will, unimpeded. Unfortunately, every Puerto Rican that leaves the island increases the per capita debt obligation for the remaining citizens. The only hope PR has to recover is for the US to step in and make the vast majority of their outstanding debt disappear, but the pension plans and private investors that own PR debt aren't interested in losing 50-75% of the money PR promised to repay them.

      --
      Ken
    31. Re:How is that possible?? by kenh · · Score: 1

      The power company was $9BN in debt before Maria, and it will cost $17BN to build the infrastructure it needs - how does the Jones Act explain that? Years of failing to pay contractors is not because of the Jones Act?

      The Jones Act goes back nearly 100 years (passed in 1920), it was in effect when Puerto Rico was rich, and now that it isn't. There are many reasons for the situation in Puerto Rico, arcane shipping regulations aren't one of them.

      --
      Ken
  2. Stiff the creditors by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stiff the power company's creditors. Allow them to declare bankruptcy. Then re-capitalize the whole thing without debt and move on with what you can actually pay for. If that's impossible or they are too corrupt/incompetent to get that done, then as an individual you should factor in whole-house power generation before getting a house or moving to PR. I'm not saying this with a shaking finger or judgment, I'm just saying it seems like common sense, now.

    1. Re:Stiff the creditors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And then the next time they try to issue bonds or borrow in some other way for some large dollar project, all the potential lenders will treat them as junk and want 15% interest to cover the fact that they'll likely default again.

      Brilliant plan.

    2. Re:Stiff the creditors by bws111 · · Score: 1

      The power company is owned by the government. While governments can declare bankruptcy it is not really a good idea if you are going to expect credit in the future.

    3. Re: Stiff the creditors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please stop with idiotic comments about "the left" or "the right," and what they may or may not know. There are smart people across the spectrum, and it doesn't help discussion to denigrate broad, unspecific groups of people. Interest rates being tied to risk is pretty darn basic.

    4. Re:Stiff the creditors by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      The whole notion that you can just upgrade the infrastructure you can afford is what got them into this mess. The core issue here is the rate they charge for the power doesn't cover the cost of generating and distributing the power.

    5. Re: Stiff the creditors by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only smart people on the left are those angling to be in charge. The rest are just chumps.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re: Stiff the creditors by Ferretman · · Score: 1

      Actually, 75.8% of their citizens according to the last census self identify as white:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      But don't let your uninformed racism change what you *believe* to be true....

      Ferret

      --
      Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
    7. Re:Stiff the creditors by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      And then the next time they try to issue bonds or borrow in some other way for some large dollar project, all the potential lenders will treat them as junk and want 15% interest to cover the fact that they'll likely default again.

      Common talking point but completely false. Countries that have defaulted on debts have been able to get credit at much lower rates than that, and quickly. Why? Because their economy is now free to grow without their GDP being siphoned off into making debt payments to colonizers. That's part of the reason why people who declare bankruptcy in the U.S. immediately see their mailboxes full of credit card offers.

    8. Re:Stiff the creditors by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Then re-capitalize the whole thing without debt and move on with what you can actually pay for. If that's impossible or they are too corrupt/incompetent to get that done

      You idea works well in practice for a company with working valuable assets. That's not the case here. You can't stiff all your creditors, declare bankruptcy, recapitalize, and then expect any 3rd party to work with you when it comes to repairing your broken crap. Not after you just failed to pay the previous people you owned money to.

      It's good old anti-mates-rates. Normally I charge $1000 for this work, but hey, because it's you .... I'm gonna need it up front.

    9. Re: Stiff the creditors by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Counter: the 20th century. You lose.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Stiff the creditors by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      That's called theft. The power authority should be going around and reporting these people to the police.

    11. Re: Stiff the creditors by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that there is no racial classification "brown"? Of course the vast majority of Latinos from Puerto Rico going to say "white" as virtually none of them are "asian" leaving "black" and "amerindian" as the only other options. Most who are not "white" will self-identify as "black" due to significant African ancestry, a small number may self-identify as "amerindian".

      This is one of weirder bits on nonsense I have seen from the right lately - declaring that ethnic discrimination against Latinos cannot exist because they are "white".

      Northern European Americans have had no problem being prejudiced against Latinos for centuries. Consider Trump attacking U.S. citizen Judge Gonzalo Curiel as a "Mexican". Clearly Curiel being a native-born U.S. citizen who was - as you say - "white" was not good enough he was still a "Mexican" (i.e. despised brown person).

      To Northern European American racists Latinos are not "white enough", or perhaps not the "right kind of white".

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    12. Re:Stiff the creditors by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, no, you spin off the assets into a new company and the debts into another new company. Then, the second one files for bankruptcy. It's the American way.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re: Stiff the creditors by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      How does the local government of PR bear no culpability? Yes, Congress has some share, but the reality is they are (mostly) letting PR run itself... into the ground.

      Except they aren't. The Jones Act means that PR can't usefully import from other countries without going through U.S. importers, which usually means significantly higher costs than they would otherwise pay if they could do direct importing from random countries using whatever shipper happened to be going the right direction.

      IMO, the only real alternatives are either statehood (which the people keep voting against) or secession (which worked out SO well the last time anybody tried it).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    14. Re: Stiff the creditors by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You attack the US for not being left enough. ..That's why it did so much better in the 20th century.

      Your gang _owns_ Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and (slightly arguably) Hitler. At least 250 megadeaths in the 20th century.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Stiff the creditors by kenh · · Score: 1

      Stiff the power company's creditors.

      Like your dad's pension?

      --
      Ken
    16. Re: Stiff the creditors by kenh · · Score: 1

      The Jones Act is not the problem in any significant way. Explain to me how slightly larger transportation costs for imported goods equals a power utility that is $9BN in debt and needs $17BN to recover? PR got rich based on advantageous tax laws that expired a decade or two ago, and PR never adjusted it's spending to reflect the new reality.

      Does Puerto Rico even have a deep water port big enough to take transoceanic container ships directly? I think Puerto Rico needs to have it's imports arrive on smaller US-flagged ships because of port restrictions.

      Do you really imagine that a poor island nation of 3-4 million people consumes enough to support a sustained flow of goods from Asia?

      Puerto Rico has for years made countless dumb decisions, long before Maria hit - it was wildly bankrupt before Maria with $172BN debt before Maria struck, or about $50Kof debt PER CAPITA.

      --
      Ken
    17. Re: Stiff the creditors by kenh · · Score: 1

      Per Capita debt levels for US States are much lower than Puerto Rico's $172BN or $50K per capita::

      The five states at the center of the snowball with the highest debt per capita are Massachusetts ($11,000), Connecticut ($9,200), Rhode Island ($8,900), Alaska ($8,200), and New Jersey ($7,400).

      Source: Here's how much state debt rests on your shoulders

      The difference isn't "shipping charges" as a result of the century-old Jones Act.

      --
      Ken
    18. Re: Stiff the creditors by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      and (slightly arguably) Hitler

      Even if you're stupid enough to think Hitler or the Nazis were somehow left-wing, a casual reading of the history would show that Hitler achieved power by wooing the right wing, and he became Chancellor because he had support from right-wing authoritarians (who thought they could control him, that didn't work).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    19. Re:Stiff the creditors by msi · · Score: 1

      You idea works well in practice for a company with working valuable assets. That's not the case here.

      How does any company have more working valuable assets than a territory of the USA? It has all the land a guaranteed tax base. Where as a company will probably has lest physical assets and they have to sell things in order to make money.

    20. Re:Stiff the creditors by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How does any company have more working valuable assets than a territory of the USA?

      You're joking right? Aside from the fact that the USA can't give 2 shits about it's territories, have you seen the state balance sheets of many of the USA's actual states for that matter?

      How many assets you have to back you needs to be wagered against the amount of debt you are in, and your willingness to part with those assets. You can't just sell an entire government.

    21. Re:Stiff the creditors by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 1

      Like the fucking cops pensions. My dad wasn't stupid enough to fall for that one. Neither am I.

  3. How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by FeelGood314 · · Score: 2

    Democracy is the best way for people to remove a government peacefully. I do realize that in the USA that's generally not possible, American's can only vote for "the other lizard", you can't actually remove both. However, in almost every other place in the world such gross mismanagement of the economy would lead to at least a viable opposition being created. What is so special about the USA when their government (i.e. congress) regularly has support in the low teens. The government of Syria has more support and they have to use violent suppression to stay in power.

    I've lived in the USA both in the Bay area and in a wealthy part of black Decatur Georgia. I like Americans. I really don't understand their support for their government.

    1. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The government" is the one responsible for the horrid state of the power grid in Puerto Rico, both structurally and financially. The power company is publicly owned (i.e. government controlled) and they prohibit anyone else from selling power.

      Any time you create a situation like that, there's a risk the people managing the utility will become complacent about doing their jobs or in some cases simply not doing their jobs, because there's no way for them to lose their jobs. There's nothing wrong with government-owned utilities and programs so long as you're careful to monitor for and stomp out such complacency. But if you fail to do so, you wind up with a sub-par infrastructure which costs far more to operate than it should.

      That's the thing most people don't seem to get about the public/private debate. It isn't that public ownership is always better than private ownership, or private is always better than public. It's that sometimes public is better than private, and sometimes private is better than public. Depending on the problems you're experiencing, it can be beneficial to make a publicly-owned company private. Or make a privately-owned company public. The key is to take the right action depending on the exact circumstances which are causing problems. Both have their advantages, and both have their failure modes.

      Unfortunately, we've developed philosophies where people think public ownership is always superior, or private is always superior. Meaning the people will keep voting for the very people who caused the situation they're suffering with, and the problem never gets fixed. That's the Achilles heel of democracy - it relies on the public being informed to function properly. A deceived public can steer a democracy straight into the ground (or in this case, into bankruptcy).

    2. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by be951 · · Score: 2

      Two senators. Every state has two senators. You don't get to vote for them both at the same time, because they are elected (overall) 1/3 at a time due to their 6 year terms. But every district in the states is represented by one House member and two Senators.

    3. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      The part of Syria that the government has to suppress wants to get rid of the government, install a theocracy, and run Syria like Iran 2.0 so it's not really compatible with reality.

    4. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      What is so special about the USA when their government (i.e. congress) regularly has support in the low teens

      While Congress as a whole has support in the low teens, the support that each congressperson has from their constituentsis actually quite high. How much of that is because of delusion is a valid question, but there's no consent each individual congressperson has the consent of the governed.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met any Puerto Ricans? As I speak the apartment next door is filled with a bunch of college age Puerto Ricans who should be in school or the military, but are instead smoking weed and playing video games. Not a particularly resourceful or high achieving culture. It's not a surprise their island is a shithole.

      And as I speak, there are plenty of college/military age white males sitting around smoking weed and cooking meth in the rural Appalachian town my grandparents live in. Not sure what your point is besides being racist.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by rbrander · · Score: 1

      Yeah, every state. Not every 3.5 million people. Every 3.5 million people get one Senator on the average, because there are 100 of them for 350 million.
      But the 3.2 million people of Puerto Rico don't get one senator; whereas the 3.2 million people of Vermont, Wyoming, Alaska and the two Dakotas get ten of them!
      And that would be the heart of Puerto Rico's real problem.

    7. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you. That does make sense. That would also explain what other wise would be really bizarre budget spending requirements. If most Americans approve of that arrangement then I'm not going to criticize.

    8. Re: How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Do you remember there was a hurricane, and since then, well, the president tossed a roll of paper towels around before going back to his golf game.

      Ah, you forgot how he graded himself on his effort to aid Puerto Rico 10 out of 10.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    9. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what the electoral college is, do you?

      Do you? Which states do you think have EC's to select who their governors are during election years?

    10. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Your knowledge of civics, in a word, sucks. The electoral college exists because we are The United STATES of America. States, and their will, matter. Because the states matter, we give them some power, in this case it is the power to choose the executive. The people choose the Congress, the States choose the president. The method by which the states choose the executive is by the Electoral College. Each state gets a number of votes equivalent to its representation in Congress.

      The manner used by each state to determine how it will vote is up to the state. Most states use a simple popular vote - whoever gets the most votes in the state gets the states votes. Some states use a proportional votes - it's votes are divided by the ratio of votes in the state.

      None of it has to do with 'elitists undoing the vote'. And none of it applies to how a state chooses it's governor.

    11. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Again, it's not the most Americans approve of the arrangement or the system. It's just most Americans approve of the part that they consider within their control*, and don't see a way of changing it. I'm not sure if there is a way to change it that won't result in a shooting war.

      (*Not including presidential results, where at least half the country is constantly pissed. More than that now.)

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    12. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Exactly what would 2 senators do for Puerto Rico? What would a handful of congressmen add to Puerto Rico's situation?

      Local government got Puerto Rico into this mess, more government probably isn't the answer.

      --
      Ken
    13. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      More leverage at the Federal Government level could only be good for them. There are some serious anti-PR laws, such as the Jones Act.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    14. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As far as my utilities go, my water and sewer are provided directly by the city, my electrical and gas and phone connections are regulated monopolies, and my garbage is picked up by private companies hired by the city. All of them work pretty well.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    15. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The Electoral College exists as a result of a compromise with slave states. Slaves and other unfree persons were counted as 3/5 of a free person in allotting House seats, and if the Presidency was a popular vote the slave state people wouldn't get additional power from their slaves.

      The reason given in the Federalist Papers, on the other hand, is so they wouldn't allow anyone like Trump to become President.

      Clearly, the EC serves none of its original purposes any more.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    16. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks AC, that's....pretty much everything I would have said. I owe you a beer.

      Actually, the Electoral College has no design mechanism whatsoever, it merely acted by happenstance, as it has before, in four instances on record.

      The only thing I'll add is how sad it is that voters are willing to be propagandized to. Democrats wont shut up about Russia, when they could be using all that energy to try and repeal the Electoral College, as they may have had a full quarter of a century control over the White House without it. Instead of Bush and Trump, we could have had Gore and Hillary.

    17. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Other way around. The EC is created precisely because it could allow someone like Trump to become president.

      Hardly. You really think elites want a hotheaded failed businessman at the top of government? Hillary was their plan, which is why the entire media and political establishment has kept up the farce that is Russiagate to remind him who's boss. The EC isn't about getting people like Trump in the White House, it's about keeping people like Eugene Debs if he had managed to get a majority vote in any of his presidential campaigns.

      The guy didn't have direct popular vote (as the Hillary camp would like to remind you), but he had support from more STATES, which is what Hamilton argued for - the POTUS is supposed to work for the United STATES, so he should be a person who has support from a large number of states, not just a few states with large populations.

      You keep harping on this imaginary distinction. Let me guess - you're one of those people who complains that senators no longer represent the states that they are from after the 17th Amendment made them elected by popular vote instead of state legislatures. Except that's a pointless tautology that doesn't actually mean anything, as senators are selected by, you know, a state's voters. Repeal the EC and presidential elections would be conducted by each state, just as they are now.

      And all a state is, is a boundary and the people who live there. The EC, aside from being another tool to give power to slave owning states that denied slaves the right to vote, disenfranchises millions of people in states across the country by making their vote pointless.

      And the EC makes most of your precious states irrelevant in presidential campaigns. Large states don't matter. Small states don't matter. Only "battleground" states matter when candidates are campaigning for office. So instead of making this about 50 states, you're making this about the same dozen states that decide every presidential election every four years. Without the electoral college, Hillary would have campaigned in Texas and Trump would have campaigned in California, unless you replaced the EC with another asinine winner-takes-all-system. So if you want states to be important in presidential elections, you want to end the electoral college, not perpetuate it.

      There's also the fact that electors are free to ignore the vote in their state and select whoever they want as president. So, yeah, the entire institution is an elitist construction to provide the illusion of representative government, and keep the proles from having a say in their own governance. Like I said the first time. Same reason women, slaves, and non-property owners couldn't vote, and why senators were selected by state legislatures instead of voters.

    18. Re:How did the people of Puerto Rico allow this? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As I said, the reason given in the Federalist papers was that it wouldn't allow Trump to be President. (Okay, they didn't use his name, but the description was pretty much on.) I think it's Federalist 68. You go read that and find out I'm right and you were wrong in your response to what I said. You're clearly referring to other arguments that I haven't seen documentation on.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is this the same place that sent away the crews that had started rebuilding the infrastructure after the hurricane because they suspected cronyism with the Trump Administration?

    Because a company with an employee count that can totaled on the hand of a drunk carpenter is the best possible choice to rebuild the power infrastructure of a whole island. Not to mention the contract prevented the PR government from auditing the contract and that the company was charging over $300 per hour for each worker.... Their contract was bigger than the one for the Army Corp of Engineers! That whole situation smelled worse than, well, a San Juan fish market after a few weeks of no refrigeration.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  5. Re:PR is a third world country. by Linsaran · · Score: 2

    It's an extreme example of what happens when you allow the rich to dictate financial policy against all bounds of sanity.

    --
    In a bit of shameless internet panhandling, I accept Litecoin Donations at Lbd2oH9QsthD1GfuUXPyka12YxvWJYnBVf
  6. Not a state. Not independent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As an American citizen I could move to Spain as a resident, and still vote in the US presidential election. If I moved to Puerto Rico and became a resident, I could not. How fucked up is thqt?!

    Make them a state or let them go already. ENOUGH!!

    1. Re:Not a state. Not independent. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you moved to Spain, you would also still pay US federal taxes.

      Citizens of Puerto Rico don't, I'm looking for a mail drop there and to change my legal residence. Being in CA, my vote is guaranteed wasted anyhow.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Not a state. Not independent. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Citizens of Puerto Rico don't [pay US federal taxes]

      While they don't pay US taxes, they do pay PR taxes. And, by federal law, PR taxes cannot be lower than US taxes (to avoid exactly what you're planning.)

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Not a state. Not independent. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The island served strategic cold-war purposes, but now that the cold-war is over, they are being thrown under the bus.

  7. Also Flint, MI still doesn't have clean water by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and there are political reasons for both of those things.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Also Flint, MI still doesn't have clean water by tomhath · · Score: 1

      political reasons for both

      More financial than political. In both cases the utility is short of money because they must provide service even if the customer doesn't pay the bill.

  8. Re:grid, always with the grid by bws111 · · Score: 1

    How well do you suppose your solar+wind combo would have held up in a hurricane? How about 2 hurricanes? Do you really think you are going to get those el-cheapo deals when every house on the island has to simultaneously replace their system due to hurricane damage? I am sure you would have no problem finding enough solar/wind installers to install 2 million systems. Should be no problem. What a great idea!

  9. Re:grid, always with the grid by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Renewables are nice, but not a real solution for the individual household consumer and don't remove the need for a power grid.

    If you have solar, you need batteries to get you though the night and cloudy days, plus additional generation capacity to charge all these batteries. Windmills are a bit better, but individuals would have a hard time building and maintaining enough capacity to keep the lights on when it's calm so you'd likely need to share capacity with your neighbors, meaning you need transmission lines.

    The issue PR has is power distribution infrastructure, not generation capacity. Adding a raft of solar panels everywhere doesn't fix the infrastructure problem. You are still going to need a power grid.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  10. So many dumb posts about corruption and debts by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Well,

    instead of answering to the dumb posts I just make a new post, so you can flame me :D

    9 billion debts are not peanuts, but for a power company that is nothing!

    Puerto Rico has a power production capacity of about 5GW: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Building a new power plant costs between 1billion and 2billioin per GW, depending on technology used and other construction hassles: https://www.eia.gov/todayinene...

    So much to: "corruption", "sozialism", "state owned", "burning tax money" ...

    The numbers above btw. do not include grid costs. Puerto Rico us burning a lot of oil, hence they have a relatively high power cost.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:So many dumb posts about corruption and debts by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      9 billion in general company bonds. I guarantee you they also have debts secured by 110% of their system's current value, which could be much lower than the replacement cost, being based on projected future revenue.

      Why would they have paid an unsecured interest rate if they still had equity? That would make no sense.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:So many dumb posts about corruption and debts by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of debts they have.
      I only see the $9B and the outrage ...

      As they are government owned or more precisely "state owned" their debts are completely irrelevant.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:So many dumb posts about corruption and debts by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Do you know of any company, private of public, that sells unsecured bonds before secured ones?

      They don't own a money printing press, their debts are absolutely relevant. Especially as they are currently in the process of being sold to the private market. You can bet they would be worth much more without the debt.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:So many dumb posts about corruption and debts by kenh · · Score: 1

      Your numbers are "interesting".

      The power company has about a million customers, maybe a million and a half (based on a total population of around 3 million residents), the $9BN in debt is to pay for the crappy, inadequate, and completely devastated power grid, they are looking at $17BN to rebuild properly (for example, build a largely hurricane-proof infrastructure), but having burned every electrical contractor firm in the industry who will do the work? who will pay for the $26BN in total debt (old plus new)?

      Puerto Rico has no industry, no raw materials, it's greatest wealth came from a tax program that incentivized manufacturing on the island, and when that expired, the economy tanked.

      $9 BN in debt could be managed, but customers don't pay their bills and the utility under charges for the electricity it generates.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re:So many dumb posts about corruption and debts by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I have no idea about the situation in PR particular.
      However I doubt privatizing the power company will change much. (That was the reason for my post)

      One part of the problem basically is, that much of the infrastructure that is over ground should be under ground. They should have switched away from oil long ago. To volatile, to expensive, to dirty.

      In a sim city world you would switch to renewables as quickly as you can ... does not really matter if you have no power during a hurricane because there is to much wind and no sun, or because your power cables are ripped away and transformers are under water.

      Anyway, to be on the safe side you have to burry the cables and make the transformers water proof.

      PR is a developing country ... that is the main problem. They don't know or have no plan how to put their resources to an effective use. Same like rest of the US ... well, technically they are not really a part of the US:

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  11. Re:grid, always with the grid by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    You might not need a grid in the traditional sense in the future but you would want a microgrid. https://www.energy.gov/article...
    The reason is that if a component in your household breaks, the system could switch automatically to the microgrid that your neighborhood shares and draw power off of that until you can get your distributed generation fixed. In addition, if you produce more than your battery bank can store, you can sell the power into the microgrid.

  12. A test bed opportunity? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

    I'm wondering if Puerto Rico might be a good place for some companies to test and showcase new power technologies. If the country's electrical grid is utter crap, then perhaps the fastest way out of the hole is to abandon large parts of it in favour of localized wind and solar capacity, with battery storage and some fossil-fuel generation capability as backup. Maybe even a couple of those dumpster-sized nuclear generators, if they're buried deep enough...

    Yes, it will cost money. That could be partially offset by the good publicity and the possible tax write-offs. It's also an opportunity to try out experimental ideas and processes in a place where the people will be a lot more accepting of failures and interruptions, because right now they have nothing to lose. That's worth money in its own right. And much of the work could be done with cheap local labour. The Puerto Rican economy could benefit in three ways - reliable power, local jobs, and technical training that would raise the level of local expertise. I could see Elon Musk taking the lead on this, and perhaps other companies would jump on board as well.

    Depending on the electrical grid to power households and small businesses is kind of quaint anyway. Local power generation provides redundancy, avoids single points of failure, reduces transmission losses, and is friendlier to renewable energy. The Grid should power industry, and serve only as a backup for less power-intensive users. Puerto Rico might be a good place to start moving in that direction.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:A test bed opportunity? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will cost money. That could be partially offset by the good publicity and the possible tax write-offs.

      The good old "paid for by hopes and dreams approach" I do recall Elon Musk providing solar and battery storage only to get grilled in this very forum for doing so. You're better off trying to crowdfund it all.

    2. Re:A test bed opportunity? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will cost money. That could be partially offset by the good publicity and the possible tax write-offs.

      The good old "paid for by hopes and dreams approach" I do recall Elon Musk providing solar and battery storage only to get grilled in this very forum for doing so. You're better off trying to crowdfund it all.

      He tweeted a few hours ago that there are over 600 locations in Puerto Rico being powered by Tesla battery packs and hopes to have several hundred more online as soon as possible
      https://twitter.com/elonmusk/s...

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:A test bed opportunity? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Cool bananas. One company well known for marketing blitzes like this is on board. But unless you can find more companies like Tesla this isn't going to solve the problem.

      We're no longer talking about storm damage mitigation, we're talking about complete overhaul of infrastructure. And I do seem to recall that Tesla originally saw these as temporary loans, especially considering that they were setup in all sorts of inconvenient places like car parks, football fields, etc.

  13. You can't really do that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    when you're dirt poor in PR. We've been dumping on PR for ages because they lean left.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You can't really do that by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Hispanics are basically religious conservatives, and they tend to vote Democrat. They simply don't feel like the Republicans are willing to accept them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  14. Re:grid, always with the grid by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    What? Seriously WTF?

    Modern _economic_ wind turbines are huge, they feather the blades and stop when the wind gets too high.

    Putting a model airplane propeller and a tiny generator on your roof is useless, unless you're pursuing a hippy chick.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  15. They didn't by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Informative

    like most poor States they don't have the resources to build a power grid without help. The same is true for KY, AL, SC and just about the entire South. That's one of the reasons they're a net importer of Federal dollars.

    PR's problem is that they're like a state but they're not. They have the disadvantages (paying taxes, military service requirements, etc) but none of the benefits. They've been trying to become a full state for ages but they lean Democrat and the Republicans have been in charge since Reagan (I'm not counting Clinton, he was so right wing he might as well have been a Republican).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Total lies. First of all there is no military service requirement in the United States. Second, they pay no federal taxes. Third, there was just a referendum giving Puerto Ricans the option to become a state. They chose "no".

    2. Re:They didn't by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      like most poor States they don't have the resources to build a power grid without help. The same is true for KY, AL, SC and just about the entire South. That's one of the reasons they're a net importer of Federal dollars.

      PR's problem is that they're like a state but they're not. They have the disadvantages (paying taxes, military service requirements, etc) but none of the benefits. They've been trying to become a full state for ages but they lean Democrat and the Republicans have been in charge since Reagan (I'm not counting Clinton, he was so right wing he might as well have been a Republican).

      Every few years they vote on a non-binding resolution to determine their political status. Options are status quo (territory), independence, or statehood. In June 2017, 23% of those eligible voted due to a boycott by the PPD party, but 97% of those who voted indicated a desire for statehood. In the previous referendum (2012), 46% indicated they wanted to keep the status quo; if that wasn't an option 61% favored statehood.

    3. Re:They didn't by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      First of all there is no military service requirement in the United States.

      I believe the GP meant selective service (registering for the draft). And yes, it is required by law for all males under 35.

      Second, they pay no federal taxes.

      Now that's just not true at all. Puerto Rico actually pays all federal taxes except for personal income tax and SSI (disability). So they pay:

      • Social Security
      • Medicare
      • Federal income tax on investment income from outside PR
      • FICA
      • Unemployment tax
      • Import and export taxes
      • Commodity taxes

      And probably others.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re: They didn't by oquendo.alfredo · · Score: 1

      We voted yes! Read the oficial results here... http://resultados2017.ceepur.o... Statehood won with 97.1 8%

    5. Re:They didn't by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I agree that this GP was wrong, but having just paid my taxes and met the maximum for Social Security, I can confidently state that federal income tax is the one that matters; the other ones are just a nuisance in comparison.

      That's because you're making enough money to meet the maximum for Social Security. Bear in mind that Puerto Rico is extremely poor. Most people make at or near minimum wage. At minimum wage (about $15k per year), after you subtract the $6,350 standard deduction, you're at about $8,650, which puts you in the 10% tax bracket. So you pay $865 in income tax, and that's before the earned income tax credit, child tax credits, etc. Most people in Puerto Rico probably won't pay much, if any income tax even if PR becomes a state.

      Medicare and Social Security, however, are a total of 7.65% are on the whole amount, with no deductions, so someone working at minimum wage pays $1,147 in Social Security and Medicare.

      In other words, except for the top few percent of people in Puerto Rico, statehood won't make much, if any difference to them financially in the immediate term, but it will eliminate barriers to trade, which over time will greatly benefit everybody there.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:They didn't by kenh · · Score: 1

      Statehood loses every time it's on the ballot in Puerto Rico - how exactly are the Republicans influencing the democrat residents to vote against statehood?

      --
      Ken
    7. Re:They didn't by kenh · · Score: 1

      Registering for the draft isn't the same as serving.

      --
      Ken
  16. Re:grid, always with the grid by bws111 · · Score: 1

    Hurricanes are not 'high winds'. Have you ever actually seen hurricane damage? Do you really think your 'pole with some u-bolts' is still going to be there when the structure it is attached to is gone?

  17. Could have had it worse.... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    I grew up in a country where the power company was (and still is) state owned.
    Constant blackouts, sometimes a week long, are not unusual.

    ....you could have had a privately owned power plant, and paid 3x the rates for worse service. Assuming they even put a line out to your neighborhood if you were in a sparsely populated area.

  18. Re:PR is a third world country. by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority is the government.

    PREPA is the only entity authorized to conduct such business in Puerto Rico, making it a government monopoly.

  19. Re:grid, always with the grid by tomhath · · Score: 1

    But the microgrids will still be interconnected, so you still have a grid.

  20. Re:grid, always with the grid by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    If you have solar, you need batteries to get you though the night and cloudy days, plus additional generation capacity to charge all these batteries. Windmills are a bit better, but individuals would have a hard time building and maintaining enough capacity to keep the lights on when it's calm so you'd likely need to share capacity with your neighbors, meaning you need transmission lines.

    Just retrofit the local water tower with a lower tank and a turbine to act as the neighborhood's battery for wind and solar power, or build a new one if necessary. If pumped storage is good enough for nuclear, it's good enough for renewables. With very low maintenance it would be usable for centuries at least.

  21. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Of course, because that was the ONLY power company in the entire world that could come and work on the island.

    /inserteyerollemoji

  22. I'm Gonna Guess.... by Ferretman · · Score: 1

    ...then that this didn't happen?

    https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/0...

    I certainly haven't heard anything about it since the initial reports.

    Ferret

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
    1. Re:I'm Gonna Guess.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      He's prohibited by law from doing anything there until the government monopoly utility is broken up and sold.

      Which is just starting, don't hold your breath. There are many politician daughters, nephews etc that will need new no show jobs. That takes time.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  23. Re:grid, always with the grid by bws111 · · Score: 1

    The purpose of the local water tower is to generate enough pressure to distribute the water properly. If you stick a turbine in there you are taking away the main benefit of having the tower in the first place.

  24. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    PR has turned into a shitshow so people in the contiguous states can point fingers and pat themselves on the back.

    It's hard to figure out what's going on down there. For example, the significant under reporting of hurricane-relate deaths (that requires government complicity) makes no sense. I assume it's to keep the local officials from looking bad and losing their jobs, but the locals are still going to know the government is lying when grandma died but the government reports zero deaths and, if anything, you would want to over report deaths as that would make the situation look worse and therefore more worthy of aid and rebuilding dollars.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  25. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    And payment upfront. When they were kicked out, they were in the process of stopping work as they hadn't been paid anyhow.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  26. Re:grid, always with the grid by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Just how much power do you think is stored in 20,000 gallons, 100 feet up?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  27. Re:grid, always with the grid by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    In the near-term, yes. In the longer term like 100 years from now, I suspect most microgrids will operate with no interconnection the main grid or only a tenuous one with a very small ability to draw current usually just to make up in dips in renewable generation or losing a large portion of a battery array.

  28. Re:grid, always with the grid by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    Just retrofit the local water tower with a lower tank and a turbine to act as the neighborhood's battery for wind and solar power,

    Methinks you WAY overestimate the amount of power that can be generated from a windmill mounted on a water tower. And the assumption that any given water tower is in a place that gets usable winds is one you might want to do a little research on.

  29. Re:grid, always with the grid by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    ^My error, I read your post wrong. I thought you were recommending adding a wind turbine to the water tower. Ignore my other post.

  30. Re:grid, always with the grid by bws111 · · Score: 1

    In other words, useless.

  31. Political Corruption by hduff · · Score: 1

    The people of Puerto Rico have been led by corrupt and useless leaders.
    http://politicalvanguard.com/i...

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  32. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by haruchai · · Score: 1

    Of course, sending them away worked out SO well for Puerto Rico.

    Letting them try to fix anything probably would have been worse.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  33. Re:grid, always with the grid by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    Solar is a complete loss.

    The 27 MW San Fermin solar plant in Puerto Rico came through Maria just fine. Ditto the recently built 1100 MW Santa Isabel Wind Farm. Gusts up to 118 MPH were recorded on some parts of the island, but San Fermin was built to withstand 155 MPH, and Santa Isabel Wind Farm was similarly properly engineered for the site.

    Solar and wind are how Puerto Rico should be largely powered in the future, with some peaking plants to cover when the output of low.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  34. Re:Rebuilt above ground I bet by ledow · · Score: 2

    Most of the UK's power infrastructure is above ground.

    They get just the same, if not worse, weather as Germany.

    We don't have these problems.

    It's not nothing to do with under/overground, it's to do with designing and maintaining the system properly.

  35. Re:grid, always with the grid by Uberbah · · Score: 1
  36. Re:grid, always with the grid by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    See the aforementioned "or build a new one if necessary".

  37. Re:grid, always with the grid by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    One of my favorite films.

  38. Re:grid, always with the grid by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Just how much power do you think is stored in 20,000 gallons, 100 feet up?

    You mean the average backyard swimming pool? Only small rooftop water towers hold that much - in which case they can act as a battery for the building it's sitting on. Standalone water towers typically have many times that capacity, with the largest holding millions of gallons.

  39. Re:Territory. Not a state. by HiThere · · Score: 1

    It's not their choice. It wasn't ever their choice.

    I was in Hawaii back when it was a territory, and it wasn't their option whether they would be a territory or a state. Being a state would have advantages. Being independent would have advantages. Being a territory... the only advantage is passport-free movement between there and the US.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  40. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    How about "Hawaii isn't in the normal path of Hurricanes" or "Hawaii doesn't have it's trade with the rest of the world restricted"?

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  41. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    So your recommendation is to let a bunch of con-men take your last resources on promises they can't deliver on?

    It wasn't just cronyism, though that was pretty blatant, but it was also incompetence. They *couldn't* have delivered on their promises, but they could have charged a fortune to try.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  42. Re:grid, always with the grid by HiThere · · Score: 1

    I don't think the cost figures are correct, but with proper design a solar system should survive a hurricane without problems. OTOH, this wouldn't be a normal roof-top system. I don't know enough about wind power to comment on that, but I believe I've seen designs that were *claimed* to be durable enough to survive hurricanes. I have no idea how efficient they were under low wind conditions.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  43. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by will_die · · Score: 1

    Thanks for proving you are a mindless tool parroting what your read from hate sites.
    have you looked at the new contract they were are pushing through now? Also look at the size of the other electrical companies and the number of employees they have that are full time or hired for a specific job; how do those numbers compare?

  44. Re:Didn't they send away help???? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    First time I've heard of wikipedia being referred to as a "hate site". Are you one of those "alternative facts" people where anything that goes against what you believe is "fake news"?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  45. Just to pay for what was lost by kenh · · Score: 1

    The island only has one electric company, and prior to Maria, it was $9 billion in debt and utilizing outdated infrastructure and equipment.

    and

    With a population of 3.74 million people, it works out to $2406/person, 8.7%GDP. on a per capita income of ~$20k.

    That $2,406/person is only to bail out the power company financially, it doesn't provide one penny for rebuilding the infrastructure to current standards, it simply settles the debt for the craptacular power grid the hurricane wiped out. To "Build Back Better" is estimated to cost an additional $17.6 Billion, which adds another $5K or so per capita...

    --
    Ken
  46. Re:grid, always with the grid by kenh · · Score: 1

    Go here, scroll down to the picture of the modern wind turbine mast standing without any blades attached and explain to me again how a wind turbine can survive a Category 4 hurricane. While you're there, look for the picture of the devastated solar panel field and tell me again how modern solar panels can survive a Category 4 hurricane.

    Wanting something to be true isn't the same as it actually being true.

    --
    Ken
  47. Re:grid, always with the grid by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    You know, I actually looked up your first Wikipedia cite. It's a potential danger you need to consider when posting.

    [The pumped hydro storage in your first cite] consists of a reservoir 110 feet (34 m) deep, 2.5 miles (4.0 km) long, and one mile (1.6 km) wide which holds 27 billion US gallons (100 Gl) or 82859 acre-feet of water.

    That would be one heck of an impressive water tower.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  48. Re:grid, always with the grid by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Read the damn GP post, the twit is talking about injection molded blades.

    Just because something feathers and brakes doesn't mean it can stand any wind. You appear to be arguing a point I didn't make.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  49. Re:grid, always with the grid by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    That's some impressive flexibility, turning a simple point made on how pumped storage is good enough to backup nuclear generated power to thinking the proposal is to put a few square miles of artificial reservoirs in every neighborhood, in a post talking about water towers.

  50. Re:grid, always with the grid by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    It's a matter of scale. Pumped hydro is useless for a power grid unless it can store a whole lot of energy. Moving 500 tons of water up and down 20m isn't going to be significant compared to the demands of a neighborhood. If it were that easy, everybody would be doing it.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  51. Re:grid, always with the grid by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Moving 500 tons of water up and down 20m isn't going to be significant compared to the demands of a neighborhood.

    Or 7500 tons for the largest water towers. But 500 would be significant, unless we're using Manhattan as the definition of a "neighborhood". Pumped storage is a proven idea, used around the world, even to back up nuclear power plants - only new thing would be using a water tower to do it. A storage tower would of course take up more space than a Tesla Powerpack. It would also have its operational use measured in centuries rather than decades.

    If it were that easy, everybody would be doing it.

    We're still on energy grids built around central power generation from nuclear or coal plants, not decentralized grids using renewables. So we don't have neighborhood sized batteries to speak of yet, using any tech. But they would plug the "baseload power" FUD that is thrown at wind and solar power.

  52. Re:grid, always with the grid by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Back of the envelope calculation suggests that a ton moving down 20m will release about 400 Kj. That means the 500-ton tower would store about 200 Mj. That's under 60 kilowatt-hours. The average US home runs about 30 Kwh a day, so that's about a day's worth of electricity for two houses. Building a water tower 15 times that size would store a day's worth of electricity for thirty houses. That's assuming 100% efficiency; in actuality, it's about 70-80% efficient, so say 22 houses. That's for a really big water tower. You can tell people to conserve on power, and you can be overconfident and figure it's 8 hours of storage, but that's a really big water tower that won't serve 100 houses with overnight electricity. There may be other problems. It would be fairly expensive to build and maintain, and might be noisy.

    As I said, it's a matter of scale. Pumped hydro is not practical for neighborhood storage.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  53. Re:grid, always with the grid by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    I'm talking a backup to maintain "baseload power" level for dark windless days, not acting as a complete replacement in the event of a power outage (a feature also not provided by coal or nuclear power grids). The real limiting factor would be geography, as it would obviously be cheaper (and more provide more power) to build your upper tank on top of a 200m high hill as opposed to a 100m tower. So a better idea for mountainous West Virginia, not so great for flatty-flat-flat Florida.